Misplaced Pages

Ulysses S. Grant: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:02, 4 December 2013 view sourceCmguy777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users51,052 edits Undid revision 584486628 by Cmguy777 (talk)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:34, 5 January 2025 view source Bruce leverett (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,799 edits Short description is too long, see explanation on talk page.Tag: Undo 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Civil War general, U.S. president (1869 to 1877)}}
{{About|the president of the United States|others with the same name|Ulysses S. Grant (disambiguation)}}
{{Redirect-several|dab=off|text=|General Grant (disambiguation)|President Grant (disambiguation)|Ulysses S. Grant (disambiguation)}}
{{Redirect|General Grant}}
{{Featured article}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2011}}
{{pp-semi|small=yes}} {{Pp|small=yes}}
{{pp-move-indef}} {{Pp-move}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2024}}
{{Use American English|date=October 2024}}
{{Infobox officeholder {{Infobox officeholder
| image = {{Easy CSS image crop
|name = Ulysses Grant
|image = Ulysses Grant 1870-1880.jpg |image = Ulysses S. Grant 1870-1880.jpg
|desired_width = 220
|office = ] ]
|location = center
|vicepresident = ] <small>(1869–1873)</small><br />] <small>(1873–1875)</small><br />''None'' <small>(1875–1877)</small>
|crop_top_perc = 5
|term_start = March 4, 1869
|term_end = March 4, 1877
|predecessor = ]
|successor = ]
|office2 = ]
|president2 = ]<br />]
|term_start2 = March 9, 1864
|term_end2 = March 4, 1869
|predecessor2 = ]
|successor2 = ]
|birth_name = Hiram Ulysses Grant
|birth_date = {{birth date|1822|4|27}}
|birth_place = ]
|death_date = {{death date and age|1885|7|23|1822|4|27}}
|death_place = ]
|restingplace = ]<br />], ]
|party = ]
|spouse = ]
|children = ], ], ], ]
|alma_mater = ]
|profession = ]
|religion = ]
|signature = UlyssesSGrantSignature.svg
|signature_alt = Cursive signature in ink
|allegiance = {{nowrap|{{flagu|United States of America|1867}}}}
|branch = ]
|serviceyears = 1839–1854<br />1861–1869
|rank = ] ]
|commands = ] <br /> ] <br /> ] <br /> ]
|battles = ]
]
}} }}
| alt = Photograph of Ulysses S. Grant's upper body
{{Ulysses Grant sidebar}}
| caption = Grant {{circa|1870–1880}}
'''Ulysses S. Grant''' (born '''Hiram Ulysses Grant'''; April 27, 1822 – July 23, 1885) was the ] president of the United States (1869–1877) following his success as military commander in the ]. Under Grant, the ] defeated the ]; the war, and ], ended with the surrender of ]'s army at Appomattox. As president, he led the ] in their effort to eliminate vestiges of Confederate nationalism and slavery, protect ] citizenship, and defeat the ]. In foreign policy, Grant sought to increase American trade and influence while remaining at peace with the world. Although his ] split in 1872 with reformers denouncing him, Grant was easily reelected. During his second term the country's economy was devastated by the ] while investigations exposed corruption scandals in the administration. The ] regained control of Southern state governments and Democrats took control of the federal House of Representatives. As Grant left the White House in 1877, his Reconstruction policies were being undone.
| order = 18th
| office = President of the United States
| vicepresident = {{plainlist|
* ] {{awrap|(1869–1873)}}
* ] {{awrap|(1873–1875)}}
* ''None'' {{awrap|(1875–1877)}}
}}
| term_start = March 4, 1869
| term_end = March 4, 1877
| predecessor = ]
| successor = ]
| office1 = ]
| president1 = {{plainlist|
* ]
* Andrew Johnson
}}
| term_start1 = March 9, 1864
| term_end1 = March 4, 1869
| predecessor1 = ]
| successor1 = ]
| office2 = Acting ]
| president2 = Andrew Johnson
| term_start2 = August 12, 1867
| term_end2 = January 14, 1868
| predecessor2 = ]
| successor2 = Edwin Stanton
| office3 = ]
| term_start3 = 1883
| term_end3 = 1884{{sfn|Utter|2015|p=141}}
| predecessor3 = E. L. Molineux
| successor3 = ]
| birth_name = Hiram Ulysses Grant
| birth_date = {{birth date|1822|4|27}}
| birth_place = ], U.S.
| death_date = {{death date and age|1885|7|23|1822|4|27}}
| death_place = ], U.S.
| resting_place = ], New York City
| party = ]
| parents = {{plainlist|
* ]
* ]
}}
| spouse = {{marriage|]|August 22, 1848}}
| children = {{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}
| occupation = {{flatlist|
* Military officer
* politician
}}
| education = ]
| signature = UlyssesSGrantSignature.svg
| signature_alt = Cursive signature in ink
| nickname = {{flatlist|
* Sam
* Unconditional Surrender
}}
| branch = {{flatlist|
* ]
** ]
}}
| serviceyears = {{plainlist|
* 1839–1854
* 1861–1869
}}
| rank = {{plainlist|
* ]
}}
| commands = {{plainlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}
| battles =
{{collapsible list|title = {{nobold|''See list''}}|
{{tree list}}
* ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
* ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
*** ]
*** ]
*** ]
*** ]
** ]
*** ]
** ]
*** ]
*** ]
*** ]
*** ]
*** ]
** ]
*** ]
*** ]
*** ]
*** ]
*** ]
*** ]
** ]
*** ]
*** ]
{{tree list/end}}
}}
}}

'''Ulysses S. Grant''' (born '''Hiram Ulysses Grant''';{{efn|Pronounced {{IPAc-en|ˈ|h|aɪ|r|ə|m|_|juː|ˈ|l|ɪ|s|iː|z}} {{respell|HY|rəm|_|yoo|LISS|eez}}}} April 27, 1822{{spaced ndash}}July 23, 1885) was the 18th ], serving from 1869 to 1877. In 1865, as ], Grant led the ] to victory in the ].

Grant was born in Ohio and graduated from the ] (West Point) in 1843. He served with distinction in the ], but resigned from the army in 1854 and returned to civilian life impoverished. In 1861, shortly after the Civil War began, Grant joined the Union Army and rose to prominence after securing victories in the ]. In 1863, he led the ] that gave Union forces control of the ] and dealt a major strategic blow to the Confederacy. President ] promoted Grant to ] and command of all Union armies after ]. For thirteen months, Grant fought ] during the high-casualty ] which ended with the capture of Lee's army ], where he formally surrendered to Grant. In 1866, President ] promoted Grant to ]. Later, Grant broke with Johnson over Reconstruction policies. A war hero, drawn in by his sense of duty, Grant was unanimously nominated by the Republican Party and then ].

As president, Grant stabilized the post-war national economy, supported congressional Reconstruction and ], and prosecuted the ]. Under Grant, the Union was completely restored. An effective civil rights executive, Grant signed a bill to create the ] and worked with ] to protect African Americans during ]. In 1871, he created the ], advancing the civil service more than any prior president. Grant was re-elected in ], but was inundated by executive scandals during his second term. His response to the ] was ineffective in halting the ], which contributed to the Democrats ]. Grant's Native American policy was to assimilate Indians into Anglo-American culture. In Grant's foreign policy, the ] against Britain were peacefully resolved, but the Senate rejected Grant's ]. In the ], Grant facilitated the approval by Congress of a peaceful compromise.

Leaving office in 1877, Grant undertook ], becoming the first president to circumnavigate the world. In 1880, he ] for a third term. In 1885, impoverished and dying of throat cancer, Grant wrote ], covering his life through the Civil War, which were posthumously published and became a major critical and financial success. At his death, Grant was the most popular American and was memorialized as a symbol of national unity. Due to the ] and ] mythology of the ] spread by Confederate sympathizers around the turn of the 20th century, ] and ] of Grant's presidency suffered considerably before they began recovering in the 21st century. Grant's critics take a negative view of his economic mismanagement and the corruption within his administration, while his admirers emphasize his ], ], and securing North and South as a single nation within the Union.<!--DO NOT remove this citation. This content is not backed up in the body.-->{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=636}} Modern scholarship has better appreciated Grant's appointments of Cabinet reformers.

==Early life and education==
{{further|Early life and career of Ulysses S. Grant}}
] in ]]]

Grant's father ] was a ] supporter and a fervent abolitionist.{{sfn|Hesseltine|1957|p=4}} Jesse and ] were married on June 24, 1821, and their first child, Hiram Ulysses Grant, was born on April 27, 1822.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=5–6|White|2016|2pp=8–9}} The name Ulysses was drawn from ballots placed in a hat. To honor his father-in-law, Jesse named the boy "Hiram Ulysses", though he always referred to him as "Ulysses".{{sfnm|Simpson|2014|1pp=2–3|White|2016|2pp=9–10}} In 1823, the family moved to ], where five siblings were born: Simpson, Clara, Orvil, Jennie, and Mary.{{sfn|Longacre|2006|pp=6–7}} At the age of five, Ulysses started at a ] and later attended two private schools.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=497|White|2016|2pp=16, 18}} In the winter of 1836–1837, Grant was a student at ], and in the autumn of 1838, he attended ]'s academy.

In his youth, Grant developed an unusual ability to ride and manage horses;{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=8, 10, 140–141|White|2016|2p=21}} his father gave him work driving supply wagons and transporting people.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1p=8|White|2016|2p=19}} Unlike his siblings, Grant was not forced to attend church by his ] parents.{{sfnm|Longacre|2006|1pp=6–7|Waugh|2009|2p=14}} For the rest of his life, he prayed privately and never officially joined any denomination.{{sfnm|Simpson|2014|1pp=2–3|Longacre|2006|2pp=6–7}} To others, including his own son, Grant appeared to be ].{{sfn|Waugh|2009|p=14}} Grant was largely apolitical before the war but wrote, "If I had ever had any political sympathies they would have been with the Whigs. I was raised in that school."{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=99–100}}

==Early military career and personal life==

===West Point and first assignment===
]

At Jesse Grant's request, Representative ] nominated Ulysses to the ] at ], in spring 1839. Grant was accepted on July 1.{{sfn|White|2016|pp=24–25}} Unfamiliar with Grant, Hamer altered his name, so Grant was enlisted under the name "U. S. Grant".{{efn|One source states Hamer took the "S" from Simpson, Grant's mother's maiden name.{{sfn|Simon|1967|p=4}} According to Grant, the "S." did not stand for anything. Upon graduation from the academy he adopted the name "Ulysses S. Grant".{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=12|Smith|2001|2pp=24, 83|Simon|1967|3pp=3–4}} Another version of the story states that Grant inverted his first and middle names to register at West Point as "Ulysses Hiram Grant" as he thought reporting to the academy with a trunk that carried the initials H.U.G. would subject him to teasing and ridicule. Upon finding that Hamer had nominated him as "Ulysses S. Grant." Grant decided to keep the name so that he could avoid the "hug" monogram; and it was easier to keep the wrong name than to try changing school records.{{sfn|Garland 1898|pages=30–31}}}}{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=12|Smith|2001|2pp=24, 83|Simon|1967|3pp=3–4|Kahan|2018|4p=2}} Since the initials "U.S." also stood for "]", he became known among army colleagues as "Sam."{{sfn|White|2016|p=30}}

Initially, Grant was indifferent to military life, but within a year he reexamined his desire to leave the academy and later wrote that "on the whole I like this place very much".{{sfnm|Simpson|2014|1p=13–14|Smith|2001|2pp=26–28}} He earned a reputation as the ].{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=10}} Seeking relief from military routine, he studied under ] artist ], producing nine surviving artworks.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=27|McFeely|1981|2pp=16–17}} He spent more time reading books from the library than his academic texts.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=16–17|Smith|2001|2pp=26–27}} On Sundays, cadets were required to march to services at the academy's church, which Grant disliked.{{sfn|White|2016|p=41}} Quiet by nature, he established a few intimate friends among fellow cadets, including ] and ]. He was inspired both by the Commandant, Captain ], and by General ], who visited the academy to review the cadets. Grant later wrote of the military life, "there is much to dislike, but more to like."{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=12–13}}

Grant graduated on June 30, 1843, ranked 21st out of 39 in his class and was promoted the next day to ] ].{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1p=27|Longacre|2006|2p=21|Cullum|1850|3pp=256–257}} He planned to resign his commission after his four-year term. He would later write that among the happiest days of his life were the day he left the presidency and the day he left the academy.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1p=28|McFeely|1981|2pp=16, 19}} Despite his excellent horsemanship, he was not assigned to the cavalry, but to the ].{{efn|At the time, class ranking largely determined branch assignments. Those at the top of the class were usually assigned to the Engineers, followed by Artillery, Cavalry, and Infantry.{{sfn|Jones|2011|p=1580}}}} Grant's first assignment was the ] near ].{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=28–29|Brands|2012a|2p=15|Chernow|2017|3p=81}} Commanded by Colonel ], this was the nation's largest military base in the West.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=28–29}} Grant was happy with his commander but looked forward to the end of his military service and a possible teaching career.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=30–33}}

===Marriage and family===
In 1844, Grant accompanied Frederick Dent to Missouri and met his family, including Dent's sister ]. The two soon became engaged.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=30–33}} On August 22, 1848, they were married at Julia's home in St. Louis. Grant's abolitionist father disapproved of the Dents' owning slaves, and neither of Grant's parents attended the wedding.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=61–62|White|2016|2p=102|Waugh|2009|3p=33}} Grant was flanked by three fellow West Point graduates in their blue uniforms, including Longstreet, Julia's cousin.{{efn|Several scholars, including ] and ], state that Longstreet was Grant's best man and the two other officers were Grant's groomsmen.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1p=62|Smith|2001|2p=73|Flood|2005|3p=2007}} All three went on to serve in the Confederate Army and surrendered to Grant at Appomattox.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=62}}}}{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=73–74|Waugh|2009|2p=33|Chernow|2017|3p=62|White|2016|4p=102}}

The couple had four children: ], ] ("Buck"), ] ("Nellie"), and ].{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=73}} After the wedding, Grant obtained a two-month extension to his leave and returned to St. Louis, where he decided that, with a wife to support, he would remain in the army.{{sfn|Simpson|2014|p=49}}

===Mexican–American War===
{{main|Mexican–American War}}
] during which Grant saw military action]]


Grant's unit was stationed in Louisiana as part of the ] under Major General ].{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=35–37|Brands|2012a|2pp=15–17}} In September 1846, President ] ordered Taylor to march {{convert|150|mi}} south to the ]. Marching to ], to prevent a Mexican siege, Grant experienced combat for the first time on May 8, 1846, at the ].{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=30–31|Brands|2012a|2p=23}} Grant served as regimental quartermaster, but yearned for a combat role; when finally allowed, he led a charge at the ].{{sfn|White|2016|p=80}} He demonstrated his equestrian ability at the ] by volunteering to carry a dispatch past snipers; he hung off the side of his horse, keeping the animal between him and the enemy.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=33–34|Brands|2012a|2p=37}} Polk, wary of Taylor's growing popularity, divided his forces, sending some troops (including Grant's unit) to form a new army under Major General ].{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=34–35}}
A career soldier, Grant graduated from the ] and served in the ]. When the Civil War began in 1861, he rejoined the Union army. In 1862, Grant was promoted to major general and took control of ] and most of ]. He then led Union forces to victory after initial setbacks in the ], earning a reputation as an aggressive commander. In July 1863, Grant defeated Confederate armies and seized ], giving the Union control of the ] and dividing the Confederacy in two. After the ] in late 1863, President ] promoted Grant to lieutenant general and commander of all of the Union armies. As commander, Grant confronted Robert E. Lee in a series of bloody battles in 1864, which ended with Grant trapping Lee at ]. During the siege, Grant coordinated a series of devastating campaigns launched by generals ], ], and ] in other theaters. Finally breaking through Lee's trenches, the Union Army captured Richmond in April 1865. Lee surrendered his depleted forces to Grant at Appomattox as the Confederacy collapsed. Most historians have hailed Grant's military genius, despite losses of men.{{sfn|Bonekemper 2004|pp=271–82}}


Traveling by sea, Scott's army landed at ] and advanced toward ].{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=41–42}} They met the Mexican forces at the battles of ] and ].{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=36}} For his bravery at Molino del Rey, Grant was brevetted first lieutenant on September 30.{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=66|Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War 2013|2p=271}} At San Cosmé, Grant directed his men to drag a disassembled ] into a church steeple, then reassembled it and bombarded nearby Mexican troops.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=36}} His bravery and initiative earned him his brevet promotion to captain.{{sfnm|Simpson|2014|1p=44|Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War 2013|2p=271}} On September 14, 1847, Scott's army marched into the city; Mexico ], including ], to the U.S. on February 2, 1848.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=67–68, 70, 73|Brands|2012a|2pp=49–52}}
After the ], Grant served two terms as president and worked to stabilize the nation during the turbulent ] period that followed. He enforced civil rights laws and fought ] violence. Grant encouraged passage of the ], giving protection for African-American voting rights. He used the army to build the Republican Party in the South, based on black voters, Northern newcomers ("]") and native white supporters ("]"). As a result, African-Americans were represented in the Congress for the first time in American history in 1870. Although there were some gains in political and civil rights by African Americans in the early 1870s, by the time Grant left office in 1877, Democrats in the South had regained control of state governments, while most blacks lost their political power for nearly a century. Reformers praised Grant's Indian peace policy that reduced Indian violence and created the ].{{sfnm|Brands||1p=501|Smith||2p=525}} In the long run, however, even his supporters agree his policies were unsuccessful. Grant's reputation fell as the economy plunged into the United States first industrial depression, called the ]. In his second term, Grant had to respond to a series of Congressional investigations into financial corruption in the government, including bribery charges of two cabinet members.
During the war, Grant established a commendable record as a daring and competent soldier and began to consider a career in the army.{{sfn|White|2016|p=75}}{{sfn|Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War 2013|p=271}} He studied the tactics and strategies of Scott and Taylor and emerged as a seasoned officer, writing in his memoirs that this is how he learned much about military leadership.{{sfnm|Simpson|2014|1p=458|Chernow|2017|2p=58}} In retrospect, although he respected Scott, he identified his own leadership style with Taylor's. Grant later believed the Mexican war was morally unjust and that the territorial gains were designed to expand slavery. He opined that the Civil War was divine punishment for U.S. aggression against Mexico.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=30—31, 37–38}}


Historians have pointed to the importance of Grant's experience as an assistant quartermaster during the war. Although he was initially averse to the position, it prepared Grant in understanding military supply routes, transportation systems, and logistics, particularly with regard to "provisioning a large, mobile army operating in hostile territory", according to biographer Ronald White.{{sfn|White|2016|p=80}} Grant came to recognize how wars could be won or lost by factors beyond the battlefield.{{sfnm|White|2016|1pp=85, 96|Chernow|2017|2p=46}}
Grant's foreign policy, led by Secretary of State ], settled the ] with Britain and avoided war with ] over the ], but his attempted ] failed. Grant's response to the Panic of 1873 gave some financial relief to New York banking houses, but was ineffective in stopping the five-year industrial depression that followed. After leaving office, Grant embarked on a two-year world tour that included many enthusiastic receptions. In 1880, he made an unsuccessful bid for a third presidential term. However, his ], written as he was dying, were a critical and popular success. His death prompted an outpouring of national mourning. Historians have, until recently, ranked Grant as nearly the worst president. Grant's reputation was marred by his defense of corrupt appointees, and by his conservative deflationary policy during the ]. {{sfnm|Brands 2012b||1p=44|Murray & Blessing||2p=55}} While still below average, his ] has significantly improved in recent years because of greater appreciation for his commitment to civil rights, moral courage in his prosecution of the Ku Klux Klan, and enforcement of voting rights.{{sfn|Brands 2012b|p=44}}


==Early life and family== ===Post-war assignments and resignation===
Grant's first post-war assignments took him and Julia to ] on November 17, 1848, but he was soon transferred to ], a desolate outpost in upstate New York, in bad need of supplies and repair. After four months, Grant was sent back to his quartermaster job in Detroit.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=65}} When the discovery of ] brought prospectors and settlers to the territory, Grant and the 4th infantry were ordered to reinforce the small garrison there. Grant was charged with bringing the soldiers and a few hundred civilians from New York City to Panama, ] to the Pacific and then north to California. Julia, eight months pregnant with Ulysses Jr., did not accompany him.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=76–78|Chernow|2017|2pp=73–74}}
]
{{main|Early life and career of Ulysses S. Grant}}
Hiram Ulysses Grant was born in ] on April 27, 1822 to Jesse Root Grant, a ] and businessman, and Hannah (Simpson) Grant.{{sfn|Smith|pp=21–22}} Jesse Grant was a Whig in politics with abolitionist sentiments.{{sfn|Hesseltine|p=4}} In the fall of 1823, the family moved to the village of ] in ]. Raised in a ] family devoid of religious pretentiousness, Grant prayed privately and was not an official member of the church.{{sfnm|Farina||1pp=13–14|Simpson|2000|2pp=2–3}} Unlike his younger siblings, Grant was neither disciplined, baptized, nor forced to attend church by his parents.{{sfn|Longacre|pp=6–7}} One of his biographers suggests that Grant inherited a degree of introversion from his reserved, even "uncommonly detached" mother (she never took occasion to visit the White House during her son's presidency).{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=8}} Grant developed an unusual ability to work with, and control, horses in his charge, and became known as a capable horseman.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=10}}


While Grant was in Panama, a ] epidemic killed many soldiers and civilians. Grant organized a field hospital in ], and moved the worst cases to a hospital barge offshore.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=74}} When orderlies protested having to attend to the sick, Grant did much of the nursing himself, earning high praise from observers.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=76–78|Chernow|2017|2pp=73–74}} In August, Grant arrived in San Francisco. His next assignment sent him north to ] in the ].{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=78|Chernow|2017|2p=75}}
When Grant was 17, Congressman ] nominated him for a position at the ] (USMA) at ]. Hamer mistakenly wrote down the name as "Ulysses S. Grant of Ohio." At West Point, he adopted this name with a middle initial only. His nickname became "Sam" among army colleagues at the academy, since the initials "U.S." also stood for "Uncle Sam". The "S", according to Grant, did not stand for anything, though Hamer had used it to abbreviate his mother's maiden name.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1p=12|Smith||2pp=24, 83}} The influence of Grant's family brought about the appointment to West Point, while Grant himself later recalled "a military life had no charms for me".{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=16}} Grant stood 5 feet 1&nbsp;inches and weighed 117&nbsp;lbs when he entered West Point.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=13}} Grant later said that he was lax in his studies, but he achieved above average grades in mathematics and geology.{{sfn|Smith|pp=26–28}} Although Grant had a quiet nature, he established a few intimate friends at West Point, including ] and ].{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1p=20|Longacre||2p=18}} While not excelling scholastically, Grant studied under ] artist ] and produced nine surviving artworks.{{sfn|Smith|pp=26–28}} He also established a reputation as a fearless and expert horseman, setting an equestrian high-jump record that stood almost 25 years.{{sfn|Smith|pp=26–28}} He graduated in 1843, ranking 21st in a class of 39. Grant was glad to leave West Point and planned to resign his commission after serving the minimum term of obligated duty.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=16, 19}} Despite his excellent horsemanship, he was not assigned to the cavalry, as assignments were determined by class rank, not aptitude.{{sfn|Smith|pp=26–28}} Grant was instead assigned as a regimental quartermaster, managing supplies and equipment in the ], with the rank of brevet ].{{sfnm|Smith||1pp=26–28|Longacre||2p=24}}


Grant tried several business ventures but failed, and in one instance his business partner absconded with $800 of Grant's investment, {{Inflation|US-GDP|800|1852|r=-3|fmt=eq}}.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|pp=48–49|Chernow|2017|p=77}} After he witnessed white agents cheating ] of their supplies, and their devastation by ] and ] transferred to them by white settlers, he developed empathy for their plight.{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=487|Chernow|2017|2p=78}}
==Military career, 1843–1854==
Grant's first assignment after graduation took him to the ] near ] in September 1843.{{sfn|Smith|pp=28–29}} It was the nation's largest military bastion in the West, commanded by Colonel ]. Grant was happy with his new commander, but still looked forward to the end of his military service and a possible teaching career.{{sfn|Smith|pp=30–33}} Grant spent some of his time in Missouri visiting the family of his West Point classmate, Frederick Dent, and getting to know Dent's sister, ]; the two became secretly engaged in 1844.{{sfn|Smith|pp=30–33}}


Promoted to ] on August 5, 1853, Grant was assigned to command Company F, ], at the newly constructed ] in California.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=52|Cullum|1891|2p=171|Chernow|2017|3p=81}} Grant arrived at Fort Humboldt on January 5, 1854, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel ].{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=81–83}} Separated from his family, Grant began to drink.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=55|Chernow|2017|2pp=84–85}} Colonel Buchanan reprimanded Grant for one drinking episode and told Grant to "resign or reform." Grant told Buchanan he would "resign if I don't reform."{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=85}} On Sunday, Grant was found influenced by alcohol, but not incapacitated, at his company's paytable.{{sfnm|Cullum|1891|1p=171|Chernow|2017|2pp=84–85}} Keeping his pledge to Buchanan, Grant resigned, effective July 31, 1854.{{sfnm|Cullum|1891|1p=171|Chernow|2017|2pp=85–86}} Buchanan endorsed Grant's resignation but did not submit any report that verified the incident.{{efn|] said that Grant left the army simply because he was "profoundly depressed" and that the evidence as to how much and how often Grant drank remains elusive.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=55}} Jean Edward Smith maintains Grant's resignation was too sudden to be a calculated decision.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=87}} Buchanan never mentioned it again until asked about it during the Civil War.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=88}} The effects and extent of Grant's drinking on his military and public career are debated by historians.{{sfn|Farina|2007|p=202}} Lyle Dorsett said Grant was an "alcoholic" but functioned amazingly well. William Farina maintains Grant's devotion to family kept him from drinking to excess and sinking into debt.{{sfnm|Farina|2007|1pp=13, 202|Dorsett|1983}}}}{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=86–87|White|2016|2pp=118–120|McFeely|1981|3p=55}} Grant did not face court-martial, and the War Department said: "Nothing stands against his good name."{{sfn|Longacre|2006|pp=55–58}} Grant said years later, "the vice of intemperance (drunkenness) had not a little to do with my decision to resign."{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=87–88|Lewis|1950|2pp=328–332}} With no means of support, Grant returned to St. Louis and reunited with his family.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=77–78}}
Rising tensions with Mexico saw Grant's unit shifted to Louisiana that year as a part of the ] under ] ].{{sfn|Smith|pp=35–37}} When the ] broke out in 1846, the Army entered Mexico. Not content with his responsibilities as a quartermaster, Grant made his way to the front lines to engage in the battle, and participated as a ''de facto'' cavalryman at the ].{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=32–33}} The army continued its advance into Mexico. At ], Grant demonstrated his equestrian ability, carrying a dispatch through sniper-lined streets on horseback while mounted in one stirrup.{{sfnm|Longacre||1pp=37–42|Brands 2012a||2pp=34–38}} President ], wary of Taylor's growing popularity, divided his army, sending some troops (including Grant's unit) to form a new army under Maj. Gen. ].{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=34–35}} Scott's army landed at ] and advanced toward ]. The army met the Mexican forces at battles of ] and ] outside Mexico City. At Chapultepec, Grant dragged a ] into a church steeple to bombard nearby Mexican troops.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=36–37}} Scott's army was soon into the city, and the Mexicans agreed to peace not long after.


==Civilian struggles, slavery, and politics==
In his memoirs, Grant later wrote that he had learned about military leadership by observing the decisions and actions of his commanding officers, and in retrospect identified himself with Taylor's style. At the time he felt that the war was a wrongful one and believed that territorial gains were designed to spread slavery throughout the nation; writing in 1883, Grant said "I was bitterly opposed to the measure, and to this day, regard the war, which resulted, as one of the most unjust ever waged by a stronger against a weaker nation." He also opined that the later Civil War was inflicted on the nation as punishment for its aggression in Mexico.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=31, 37}}
]


In 1854, at age 32, Grant entered civilian life, without any money-making vocation to support his growing family. It was the beginning of seven years of financial struggles and instability.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=95, 106|Simon|2002|2p=242|McFeely|1981|3p=60–61|Brands|2012a|4pp=94–96}} Grant's father offered him a place in the ], branch of the family's leather business, but demanded Julia and the children stay in Missouri, with the Dents, or with the Grants in Kentucky. Grant and Julia declined. For the next four years, Grant farmed with the help of Julia's slave, Dan, on his brother-in-law's property, ''Wish-ton-wish'', near ].{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=58–60|White|2016|2p=125}} The farm was not successful and to earn a living he sold firewood on St. Louis street corners.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=61}}
On August 22, 1848, after a four-year engagement, Grant and Julia were married.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=20, 26}} They would have four children: ]; ]; ]; and ].{{sfn|Smith|p=73}} Grant was assigned to several different posts over the ensuing six years. His first post-war assignments took him and Julia to ] and ], the location that made them the happiest.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=44}} In the spring of 1852, he traveled in to Washington, D.C. in a failed attempt to prevail upon the Congress to rescind an order that he, in his capacity as quartermaster, reimburse the military $1000 in losses incurred on his watch, for which he bore no personal guilt.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=46}} He was sent west to ] in the ] in 1852, initially landing in ] during the height of the ]. Julia could not accompany him as she was eight months pregnant with their second child.{{sfn|Smith|pp=76–77}} The journey proved to be an ordeal due to transportation disruptions and an outbreak of ] within the entourage while traveling overland through Panama. Grant made use of his organizational skills, arranging makeshift transportation and hospital facilities to take care of the sick; even so there were 150 fatalities.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=47}} After Grant arrived in San Francisco he traveled to Fort Vancouver, continuing his service as quartermaster.


In 1856, the Grants moved to land on Julia's father's farm, and built a home called "Hardscrabble" on ]; Julia described it as an "unattractive cabin".{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=58–60|Chernow|2017|2p=94}} Grant's family had little money, clothes, and furniture, but always had enough food.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=96}} During the ], which devastated Grant as it did many farmers, Grant pawned his gold watch to buy Christmas gifts.{{sfn|White|2016|p=128}} In 1858, Grant rented out Hardscrabble and moved his family to Julia's father's ].{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=62|Brands|2012a|2p=86|White|2016|3p=128}} That fall, after having ], Grant gave up farming.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|pp=89–90|White|2016|p=129}}
To supplement a military salary inadequate to support his family, Grant, assuming his work as quartermaster so equipped him, attempted but failed at several business ventures.{{sfn|Smith|pp=81–82}} The business failures in the West confirmed Jesse Grant's belief that his son had no head for business, creating frustration for both father and son. In one case, Grant had even naively allowed himself to be swindled by a partner.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=48–49}} These failures, along with the separation from his family, made for quite an unhappy soldier, husband and son. Rumors began to circulate that Grant was drinking in excess.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=48–49}}


That same year, Grant acquired a ] from his father-in-law, a thirty-five-year-old man named William Jones.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=94–95|White|2016|2p=130}} Although Grant was not an ] at the time, he disliked slavery and could not bring himself to force an enslaved man to work.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=86–87}} In March 1859, Grant freed Jones by a ] deed, potentially worth at least $1,000 (equivalent to ${{formatnum:{{Inflation|US|1000|1859|r=-3}}}} in {{Inflation/year|US}}).{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=94–95|McFeely|1981|2p=69|White|2016|3p=130}}
In the summer of 1853, Grant was promoted to ], one of only fifty on active duty, and assigned to command Company F, 4th Infantry, at ], on the northwest California coast. Without explanation, he shortly thereafter resigned from the army on July 31, 1854. The commanding officer at Fort Humboldt, brevet Lieutenant Colonel ], a strict disciplinarian, had reports that Grant was intoxicated off duty while seated at the pay officer's table. Buchanan had previously warned Grant several times to stop his drinking. In lieu of a court-martial, Buchanan gave Grant an ultimatum to sign a drafted resignation letter. Grant resigned; the War Department stated on his record, "Nothing stands against his good name."{{sfn|Longacre|pp=55–58}} Rumors, however, persisted in the regular army of Grant's intemperance. According to biographer McFeely, historians overwhelmingly agree that his intemperance at the time was a fact, though there are no eyewitness reports extant.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=55}} Two of Grant's lieutenants corroborated this story and Buchanan confirmed it to another officer in a conversation during the Civil War. {{sfnm|Smith||1pp=87–88|Lewis|2pp=328–332}} Years later, Grant said, "the vice of intemperance had not a little to do with my decision to resign."{{sfnm|Smith||1pp=87–88|Lewis|2pp=328–332}} Grant's father, again believing his son's only potential for success to be in the military, tried to get the Secretary of War, ], to rescind the resignation, to no avail.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=57}}


Grant moved to St. Louis, taking on a partnership with Julia's cousin Harry Boggs working in the real estate business as a bill collector, again without success and at Julia's prompting ended the partnership.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=64|Brands|2012a|2pp=89–90|White|2016|3pp=129–131}} In August, Grant applied for a position as county engineer. He had thirty-five notable recommendations, but Grant was passed over by the ] and ] county commissioners because he was believed to share his father-in-law's ] sentiments.{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=131|Simon|1969|2pp=4–5}}
==Civilian life==
]
At age 32, with no civilian vocation, Grant struggled through seven financially lean years. His father, Jesse, initially offered Grant a position in the Galena, Illinois branch of the tannery business, on condition that Julia and the children, for economic reasons, stay with her parents in Missouri, or the Grants in Kentucky. Ulysses and Julia were adamantly opposed to another separation, and declined the offer.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=58–60}} In 1854, Grant farmed on his brother-in-law's property near St. Louis, using slaves owned by Julia's father, but it did not succeed.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=58–60}} Two years later, Grant and family moved to a section of his father-in-law's farm and, to give his family a home, built a house he called "]".{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=58–60}} Julia hated the rustic house, which she described as an "unattractive cabin".{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=58–60}} During this time, Grant also acquired a slave from Julia's father, a thirty-five-year-old man named William Jones.{{sfn|Smith|pp=94–95}} Having met with no success farming, the Grants left the farm when their fourth and final child was born in 1858. Grant freed his slave in 1859 instead of selling him, at a time when slaves commanded a high price and Grant needed money badly.{{sfn|Smith|pp=94–95}} For the next year, the family took a small house in St. Louis where he worked, again without success, with Julia's cousin Harry Boggs, as a bill collector.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=64}} In 1860 Jesse offered him the job in his tannery in ], without condition, which Ulysses accepted. The leather shop, "Grant & Perkins", sold harnesses, saddles, and other leather goods and purchased hides from farmers in the prosperous Galena area. He moved his family to ] that year.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=65–66}}


In April 1860, Grant and his family moved north to Galena, accepting a position in his father's leather goods business, "Grant & Perkins", run by his younger brothers Simpson and Orvil. In a few months, Grant paid off his debts.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=65–66|White|2016|2pp=133, 136}} The family attended the local Methodist church and he soon established himself as a reputable citizen.{{sfn|White|2016|pp=135–37}}
]Grant was not politically active and never endorsed any candidate before the Civil War.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=69}} His father-in-law was a prominent ] in Missouri, a factor that helped derail Grant's bid to become county engineer in 1859, while his father was an outspoken ] in Galena.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=95}} In the 1856 election, Grant cast his first presidential vote for the Democrat, ], saying he was really voting against ], the Republican.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=69}} In 1860, he favored the Democratic presidential candidate ] over ], and Lincoln over the Southern Democrat, ]. Lacking the residency requirements in Illinois at the time, he could not vote. By August 1863, during the ], after the fall of ], Grant's political sympathies fully coincided with the ]' aggressive prosecution of the war and for the abolition of slavery.{{sfn|Catton 1968|p=8}}


==Civil War== ==Civil War==
{{main|Ulysses S. Grant and the American Civil War}} {{main|Ulysses S. Grant and the American Civil War}}
]
On April 13, 1861, the ] began as Confederate troops attacked Union ] in Charleston, South Carolina forcing its surrender. Two days later, Lincoln put out a call for 75,000 volunteers. A mass meeting was called in Galena to encourage recruitment. Recognized as the sole military professional in the area, Grant was asked to lead the meeting and ensuing effort. He proceeded to help recruit a company of volunteers and accompanied it to ], the capital of Illinois. Illinois Governor ] offered Grant a position recruiting and training volunteer units, which he accepted, but Grant wanted a field command in the regular Army. He made multiple efforts with contacts (including Maj. Gen. ]) to acquire such a position with no success. Meanwhile, Grant continued serving at the training camps and made a positive impression on the volunteer Union recruits. With the aid of his advocate in Washington, ], Grant was promoted to Colonel by Governor Richard Yates on June 14, 1861, and put in charge of the unruly ]. Transferred to northern Missouri, Grant was promoted by President Lincoln to Brigadier General, supported by Congressman Washburn, backdated to May 17, 1861.{{sfn|Smith|p=113}} By the end of August 1861, Grant was given charge of the southern Illinois, District of ], by Maj. Gen ], an outside Lincoln appointment, who viewed Grant as "a man of dogged persistence, and iron will." Grant's own demeanor had changed immediately at the outset of the war; with renewed energies and confidence.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1pp=73–76, 80|Smith||2pp=107–108}} He later recalled with apparent satisfaction that after that first recruitment meeting in Galena, 'I never went into our leather store again..."{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=73}} During this time Grant quickly perceived that the war would be fought for the most part by volunteers, and not professional soldiers.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=80}}


On April 12, 1861, the ] began when Confederate troops ] in ].{{sfn|White|2016|p=140}} The news came as a shock in Galena, and Grant shared his neighbors' concern about the war.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=121}} On April 15, Lincoln called for 75,000 volunteers.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=99}} The next day, Grant attended a mass meeting to assess the crisis and encourage recruitment, and a speech by his father's attorney, ], stirred Grant's patriotism.{{sfnm|White|2016|1pp=140–43|Brands|2012a|2pp=121–22|McFeely|1981|3p=73|Bonekemper|2012|4p=17|Smith|2001|5p=99|Chernow|2017|6p=125}} In an April 21 letter to his father, Grant wrote out his views on the upcoming conflict: "We have a government and laws and a flag, and they must all be sustained. There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots."{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=123}}
===Forts Henry and Donelson===
]
Grant's troops first saw action in late 1861, starting out from his base at ], the strategic point where the Ohio River flows into the Mississippi River and near the Tennessee and Cumberland rivers.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=151}} The Confederate army was stationed in Columbus, Kentucky under Maj. Gen. ]. Maj. Gen. ] ordered Grant to make "demonstrations", not including attack, against the Confederate Army at Belmont.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=151}} After Lincoln relieved Frémont from command, Grant attacked Fort Belmont taking 3,114 Union troops by boat on November 7, 1861. He initially took the fort, but his army was later pushed back to Cairo by the reinforced Confederates under Brig. Gen. ]. A tactical defeat, the battle nonetheless instilled much needed confidence in Grant and his volunteers.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=92–94}} Following Belmont, Grant asked Maj. Gen. ] for permission to move against Fort Henry on the Tennessee River; Halleck agreed on condition that the attack be conducted with oversight by Union Navy ] ]. Grant's troops, in close cooperation with Foote's naval forces successfully captured ] on February 6, 1862 and nearby Fort Donelson on the Cumberland River on February 16.{{sfn|Smith|pp=141–164}} Fort Henry, undermanned by Confederates and nearly submerged from flood waters, was taken over with few losses.{{sfn|Whyte|pp=18–39}} However, at Fort Donelson, Grant and Foote encountered stiffer resistance from the Confederate forces under Pillow. Grant's initial 15,000 troops were joined by 10,000 reinforcements, against 12,000 Confederate troops at Fort Donelson. Foote's initial approach by Union naval ships were repulsed by Donelson's guns. The Confederates, who were surrounded by Grant's army attempted a break out, pushing Grant's right flank into disorganized retreat eastward on the Nashville road.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=164–165}} Grant rallied his troops, resumed the offensive, retook the Union right and attacked Pillow's left. Pillow ordered Confederate troops back into the fort, relinquished command to Brig. Gen. ] who surrendered to Grant the next day. Grant's terms were repeated across the North: "No terms except an unconditional and immediate surrender can be accepted."{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=164–165}} Grant became a celebrity in the North, now nicknamed "Unconditional Surrender" Grant. With these victories, President Abraham Lincoln promoted Grant to ] of volunteers.{{sfn|Smith|pp=125–34}}


===Shiloh=== ===Early commands===
{{further|Kentucky in the American Civil War}}
Grant's advance at Forts Henry and Donelson was the most significant advance into the Confederacy to date. His army, known as the ], had increased to 48,894 men and was encamped on the western side of the Tennessee River. Grant met with Brig. Gen. ], and they prepared to attack the Confederate stronghold of equal numbers at ].{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=111}} The Confederates had the same thing in mind, and moved first at dawn on April 6, 1862, with a full attack on the Union Army at the ]. The objective was to annihilate the western Union offensive in one massive assault. Over 44,000 Confederate troops, led by Generals ] and ], attacked the five divisions of Grant's army bivouacked nine miles south at Pittsburg Landing. Aware of the impending Confederate attack, Union troops sounded the alarm and readied for battle. The Confederates struck hard and pushed the Union Army back towards the Tennessee River. At the end of the day, the Union Army was vulnerable, and might have been destroyed had Beauregard's troops not been too exhausted to continue the fight.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=114}} Avoiding panic, Grant and Sherman rallied their troops for a counterattack the next morning. With reinforcement troops from Maj. Gen. ] and Maj. Gen. ]'s missing division, Grant succeeded in driving the Confederates back to the road from Corinth. Although he stopped short of capturing Beauregard's army, Grant was able to stabilize the Army of the Tennessee.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1p=115|Smith||2pp=167–205}}
On April 18, Grant chaired a second recruitment meeting, but turned down a captain's position as commander of the newly formed militia company, hoping his experience would aid him to obtain a more senior rank.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=122–123|McFeely|1981|2p=80|Bonekemper|2012|p=17}} His early efforts to be recommissioned were rejected by Major General ] and Brigadier General ]. On April 29, supported by Congressman ] of Illinois, Grant was appointed military aide to Governor ] and mustered ten regiments into the ]. On June 14, again aided by Washburne, Grant was appointed colonel and put in charge of the ];<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.nps.gov/civilwar/search-battle-units-detail.htm?battleUnitCode=UIL0021RI | title=Battle Unit Details - the Civil War |publisher=U.S. National Park Service}}</ref> he appointed ] as his ] and brought order and discipline to the regiment. Soon after, Grant and the 21st Regiment were transferred to Missouri to dislodge Confederate forces.{{sfnm|Flood|2005|1pp=45–46|Smith|2001|2p=113|Bonekemper|2012|3pp=18–20}}


On August 5, with Washburne's aid, Grant was appointed brigadier general of volunteers.{{sfn|Bonekemper|2012|p=21}} Major General ], Union commander of the West, passed over senior generals and appointed Grant commander of the District of Southeastern Missouri.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=117–18|Bonekemper|2012|2p=21}} On September 2, Grant arrived at ], assumed command by replacing Colonel ], and set up his headquarters to plan a campaign down the Mississippi, and up the Tennessee and Cumberland rivers.{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=159|Bonekemper|2012|2p=21}}
The battle was the costliest of the war to date, with aggregate Union and Confederate casualties of 23,746, and minimal strategic advantage gained by either side. Nevertheless, Grant received high praise from many corners. He later remarked that the carnage at Shiloh had made it clear to him that the Confederacy would only be defeated by complete annihilation of its armies. Grant was criticized for his decision to keep the Union Army bivouacked rather than entrenched.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=186–187}} Halleck transferred command of the Army of the Tennessee to Brig. Gen. ] and "promoted" Grant to the hollow position of second-in-command of all the armies of the west. As a result, Grant was again on the verge of resigning until Sherman paid a visit to his camp.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=190–192}} Sherman, whose experiences in the military had been similar to Grant's, convinced Grant to remain in the army. During Halleck's sluggish advance on Corinth—covering 19 miles in 30 days—the entire Confederate force there escaped; the 120,000-man Union Army was then broken up. ], an investigative agent for Secretary of War ] at the time, interviewed Grant and related to Lincoln and Stanton that Grant appeared "self-possessed and eager to make war." Lincoln reinstated Grant to his command of the Army of the Tennessee.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=117–21}}


After the Confederates moved into western Kentucky, taking Columbus, with designs on southern Illinois, Grant notified Frémont and, without waiting for his reply, advanced on ], taking it without a fight on September 6.{{sfnm|Flood|2005|1p=63|White|2016|2p=159|Bonekemper|2012|3p=21}} Having understood the importance to Lincoln of Kentucky's neutrality, Grant assured its citizens, "I have come among you not as your enemy, but as your friend."{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=91|Chernow|2017|2pp=153–155}} On November 1, Frémont ordered Grant to "]" against the Confederates on both sides of the Mississippi, but prohibited him from attacking.{{sfn|White|2016|p=168}}
===Vicksburg===
{{further|Western Theater of the American Civil War}}
], fought on 14 May 1863, in Jackson, Mississippi, was part of the ].]]
Lincoln was determined to take the strategic Confederate stronghold at ], on the Mississippi River and authorized Maj. Gen. ] to raise an army in his home state of Illinois for the purpose. Grant was very frustrated at the lack of direction he was receiving to move forward from his station in Memphis, and more aggravated to learn of this apparent effort to brush him aside. According to biographer ], this discontent may have been responsible for Grant's ill-considered issuance of ] on December 17, 1862. This order expelled Jews, as a class, from Grant's military district, in reaction to illicit activities of overly aggressive cotton traders in the Union camps, who Grant believed were interfering with military operations.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=123–24}} Lincoln demanded the order be revoked, and Grant rescinded it twenty-one days after issuance. Without admitting fault, Grant believed he had only complied with the instructions sent from Washington. According to another Grant biographer, ], it was "one of the most blatant examples of state-sponsored ] in American history."{{sfn|Smith|pp=225–27}} Grant had believed that gold, along with cotton, was being smuggled through enemy lines and that Jews could pass freely into enemy camps.{{sfn|Longacre|pp=159–61}} Grant later expressed regret for this order in 1868; his attitude concerning Jews was otherwise undeclared.{{sfn|Longacre|pp=159–61}}


===Belmont (1861), Forts Henry and Donelson (1862)===
In December 1862, with Halleck's approval, Grant moved to take Vicksburg by an overland route, aided by ] and ], in combination with a water expedition on the Mississippi led by Maj. Gen. Sherman. Grant had thus pre-empted his rival McClernand's move. Confederate cavalry raiders Brig. Gen. ] and Maj. Gen. ] stalled Grant's advance by disrupting his communications, while the Confederate army led by Lt. Gen. ] concentrated and repulsed Sherman's direct approach at ]. McClernand afterwards attempted to salvage Sherman's effort to no avail, so at the end of the first day neither Grant nor McClernand had succeeded.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=125–26}}
{{main|Battle of Belmont|Battle of Fort Henry|Battle of Fort Donelson}}
], 1887]]


On November 2, 1861, Lincoln removed Frémont from command, freeing Grant to attack Confederate soldiers encamped in ], Missouri.{{sfn|White|2016|p=168}} On November 5, Grant, along with Brigadier General ], landed 2,500 men at Hunter's Point, and on November 7 engaged the Confederates at the ].{{sfn|White|2016|pp=169–171}} The Union army took the camp, but the reinforced Confederates under Brigadier Generals ] and ] forced a chaotic Union retreat.{{sfn|White|2016|p=172}} Grant had wanted to destroy Confederate strongholds at ], and ], but was not given enough troops and was only able to disrupt their positions. Grant's troops escaped back to Cairo under fire from the fortified stronghold at Columbus.{{sfnm|White|2016|1pp=172–173|Groom|2012|2pp=94, 101–103}} Although Grant and his army retreated, the battle gave his volunteers much-needed confidence and experience.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=92–94}}
During the second attempt to capture Vicksburg, Grant made a series of unsuccessful and criticized movements along bayou and canal water routes. Finally, in April 1863, Grant marched Union troops down the west side of the Mississippi River and crossed east over at Bruinsburg using Rear Adm. ]'s ships. Grant previously had ordered two diversion battles that confused Pemberton and allowed Grant's army to cross the Mississippi. After a series of battles, including the capture of a railroad junction near ], Grant went on to defeat Pemberton at the ]. Grant then assaulted the Vicksburg fortress twice, and suffered serious losses. After the failed assault, Grant settled in for a siege lasting seven weeks. As the siege began, Grant lapsed into a two-day drinking episode.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=132–35}} Pemberton surrendered Vicksburg to Grant on July 4, 1863.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1pp=122–138|Smith||2pp=206–257}} During the campaign, Grant assumed responsibility for refugee-contraband slaves who were displaced by the war and vulnerable to Confederate marauders; Lincoln had authorized their recruitment into the Union Army. Grant put the refugees under the protection of Brig. Gen. ] who authorized them to work on abandoned Confederate plantations to support the war effort. The effort was the precursor to the ] during later Reconstruction.


Columbus blocked Union access to the lower Mississippi. Grant and lieutenant colonel ] planned to bypass Columbus and move against ] on the ]. They would then march east to ] on the ], with the aid of gunboats, opening both rivers and allowing the Union access further south. Grant presented his plan to ], his new commander in the newly created ].{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=168|McFeely|1981|2p=94}} Halleck rebuffed Grant, believing he needed twice the number of troops. However, after consulting McClellan, he finally agreed on the condition that the attack would be in close cooperation with the navy ], ].{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=138–142|Groom|2012|2pp=101–103}} Foote's gunboats bombarded Fort Henry, leading to its surrender on February 6, 1862, before Grant's infantry even arrived.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=146}}
The fall of Vicksburg gave the Union control over the entire Mississippi and split the Confederacy in two. Grant demonstrated that an indirect assault coupled with diversionary tactics was highly effective strategy in defeating an entrenched army. Although the success at Vicksburg was a great morale boost for the Union war effort, Grant received much criticism for his decisions and his reported drunkenness. Lincoln again sent Dana to keep a watchful eye on Grant's alleged intemperance; Dana eventually became Grant's devoted ally, and made light of the drinking.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=128, 135}} The personal rivalry between McClernand and Grant continued over Vicksburg, but ended when Grant removed McClernand from command after he issued, and arranged the publication of, a military order in contravention of Grant.


Grant ordered an immediate ], which dominated the Cumberland River. Unaware of the garrison's strength, Grant, McClernand, and Smith positioned their divisions around the fort. The next day McClernand and Smith independently launched probing attacks on apparent weak spots but were forced to retreat. On February 14, Foote's gunboats began bombarding the fort, only to be repulsed by its heavy guns. The next day, Pillow attacked and routed McClernand's division. Union reinforcements arrived, giving Grant a total force of over 40,000 men. Grant was with Foote four miles away when the Confederates attacked. Hearing the battle, Grant rode back and rallied his troop commanders, riding over seven miles of freezing roads and trenches, exchanging reports. When Grant blocked the Nashville Road, the Confederates retreated back into Fort Donelson.{{sfn|Axelrod|2011|p=210}} On February 16, Foote resumed his bombardment, signaling a general attack. Confederate generals ] and Pillow fled, leaving the fort in command of ], who submitted to Grant's demand for "unconditional and immediate surrender".{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=141–164|Brands|2012a|2pp=164–165}}
===Chattanooga and promotion===
] and defeat Bragg's army.]]
Lincoln put Grant in command of the newly formed ] in October 1863, giving Grant charge of the entire western theater of war, except for Louisiana. After the ], Confederate Gen. ] forced Maj. Gen. ]'s Army of the Cumberland to retreat into Chattanooga, a central railway hub, surrounded the city and trapped the Union army inside. Only Maj. Gen. ] and the XIV Corps kept the Army of the Cumberland from complete defeat at the Battle of Chickamauga. When informed of the ominous situation at Chattanooga, Grant relieved Rosecrans from duty and placed Thomas in charge of the besieged ]. To stop the siege and go on the attack, Grant, personally rode out to Chattanooga and took charge of the desperate situation. Lincoln sent Maj. Gen. ] and two divisions of the Army of the Potomac to reinforce the Army of the Cumberland, however, the Confederates kept the two armies from meeting. Grant's first action was to open up a supply line to the Army of the Cumberland trapped in Chattanooga. Following a plan devised by Maj. Gen. ], a "Cracker Line" was formed with Hooker's Army of the Potomac on Lookout Mountain and supplied the Army of the Cumberland with food and weapons.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1pp=139–51|Smith||2pp=262–71}}


Grant had won the first major victory for the Union, capturing Floyd's entire army of more than 12,000. Halleck was angry that Grant had acted without his authorization and complained to McClellan, accusing Grant of "neglect and inefficiency". On March 3, Halleck sent a telegram to Washington complaining that he had no communication with Grant for a week. Three days later, Halleck claimed "word has just reached me that&nbsp;... Grant has resumed his bad habits (of drinking)."{{sfn|Groom|2012|pp=138, 143–144}} Lincoln, regardless, promoted Grant to major general of volunteers and the Northern press treated Grant as a hero. Playing off his initials, they took to calling him "Unconditional Surrender Grant".{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=164–165|Smith|2001|2pp=125–134}}
On November 23, 1863, Grant organized three armies to attack Bragg's troops on ] and ]. The next day, Sherman and four divisions of the Army of the Tennessee assaulted Bragg's right flank. Thomas and the ] overtook Confederate picket trenches at the base of Missionary Ridge. Hooker's forces took Lookout Mountain and captured 1,064 prisoners. On November 25, Sherman continued his attack on Bragg's right flank on the northern section of Missionary Ridge. In response to Sherman's assault Bragg withdrew Confederate troops on the main ridge to reinforce the Confederate right flank. Seeing that Bragg was reinforcing his right flank, Grant ordered Thomas to make a general assault on Missionary Ridge. After a brief delay, the Army of the Cumberland, led by Maj. Gen. ] and Brig. Gen. ], captured the first Confederate entrenchments. Without further orders, the Army of the Cumberland continued up hill and captured the Confederate's secondary entrenchments on top of Missionary Ridge; forcing the defeated Confederates into disorganized retreat. Although Bragg's army had not been captured, the decisive battle opened ] and the heartland of the Confederacy to Union invasion. Grant's fame increased and he was promoted to ], a position that had previously been given only to George Washington and Winfield Scott.{{sfn|Smith|pp=258–281}}


===Shiloh (1862) and aftermath===
] Ulysses S. Grant]]
{{further|Battle of Shiloh}}
Disappointed with Maj. Gen. George Meade's failure to pursue Lee after the Confederate defeat at the ], Lincoln made Grant commander of all Union armies in March 1864.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=148}} Grant gave the Department of the Mississippi to Sherman, and went east to Washington, D.C., to devise a strategy with Lincoln. After settling Julia into a house in Georgetown, Grant established his headquarters fifty miles away, near Meade's Army of the Potomac in Culpeper, Virginia.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=156}} The Union strategy of a comprehensive effort to bring about a speedy victory for the Union consisted of coordinated Union offensives, attacking the rebel armies at the same time to keep the Confederates from shifting reinforcements within southern interior lines. Maj. Gen. Sherman would attack ] and Georgia, while Maj. Gen. Meade would lead the Army of the Potomac, with Grant in camp, to attack ]'s ]. Maj. Gen. ] was to attack and advance towards Richmond from the south, going up the ].{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=157}} Depending on Lee's actions, Grant would join forces with Butler's armies and be fed supplies from the James River. Maj. Gen. ] was to capture the railroad line at ], move east, and attack from the ].{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1pp=157–175|Smith||2pp=313–39, 343–68}} Grant was riding a rising tide of popularity, and there were discussions in some corners that a Union victory early in the year could open the possibility of his candidacy for the presidency. Grant was aware of it, but had ruled it out in discussions with Lincoln; in any case, the possibility would soon vanish with delays on the battlefield.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=162–63}}
], 1888]]


Reinstated by Halleck at the urging of Lincoln and Secretary of War ], Grant rejoined his army with orders to advance with the ] into Tennessee. His main army was located at ], while 40,000 Confederate troops converged at ].{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=210|Barney|2011|2p=287}} Grant wanted to attack the Confederates at Corinth, but Halleck ordered him not to attack until Major General ] arrived with his division of 25,000.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=111–112|Groom|2012|2p=63|White|2016|3p=211}} Grant prepared for an attack on the Confederate army of roughly equal strength. Instead of preparing defensive fortifications, they spent most of their time drilling the largely inexperienced troops while Sherman dismissed reports of nearby Confederates.{{sfnm|Groom|2012|1pp=62–65|McFeely|1981|2p=112}}
===Overland Campaign and victory===

Sigel's and Butler's efforts sputtered and Grant was left alone to fight Lee in a series of bloody battles of attrition known as the ]. After taking the month of April 1864 to assemble and ready the Army of the Potomac, Grant crossed the ] on May 4 and attacked Lee in the ], a hard-fought three-day battle with many casualties. Rather than retreat as his predecessors had done, Grant flanked Lee's army to the southeast and attempted to wedge the Union Army between Lee and Richmond at Spotsylvania.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=165}} Lee's army got to ] first and a costly battle began that lasted thirteen days. During the battle, Grant attempted to break through Lee's line of defense at the Mule Shoe, which resulted in one of the bloodiest assaults during the Civil War, known as ]. Unable to break Lee's line of defense after repeated attempts, Grant flanked Lee to the southeast east again at ], a battle that lasted three days.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=169}} This time the Confederate Army had a superior defensive advantage on Grant. Grant then maneuvered the Union Army to ], a vital railroad hub that was linked to Richmond, but Lee's men were able to entrench against the Union assault. During the third day of the thirteen-day battle, Grant led a costly assault on Lee's trenches. As news spread in the North, heavy criticism fell on Grant, who was called "the Butcher", having taken 52,788 casualties in thirty days since crossing the Rapidan.{{sfn|Bonekemper 2011|pp=41–42}} Lee suffered 32,907 Confederate casualties, and was less able to replace them.{{sfn|Bonekemper 2011|pp=41–42}} When the two armies had fought to a stalemate, the generals took three days to reach a truce, so that the dead and dying could be removed from the battlefield.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=171}} The costly June 3 assault at Cold Harbor was the second of two battles in the war which Grant later distinctly regretted.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=173}} Unknown to Lee, Grant pulled out of Cold Harbor and moved his army south of the James River, freed Maj. Gen. Butler from ], and attacked Petersburg, Richmond's central railroad hub.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1pp=157–175|Smith||2pp=313–39, 343–68}}
On the morning of April 6, 1862, Grant's troops were taken by surprise when the Confederates, led by Generals ] and ], struck first "like an Alpine avalanche" near Shiloh church, attacking five divisions of Grant's army and forcing a confused retreat toward the Tennessee River.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=111|Bonekemper|2012|2pp=51, 94|Barney|2011|3p=287}} Johnston was killed and command fell upon Beauregard.{{sfn|White|2016|pp=217–218}} One Union line held the Confederate attack off for several hours, giving Grant time to assemble artillery and 20,000 troops near Pittsburg Landing.{{sfn|Bonekemper|2012|pp=51, 58–59, 63–64}} The Confederates finally broke and captured a Union division, but Grant's newly assembled line held the landing, while the exhausted Confederates, lacking reinforcements, halted their advance.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=114|Flood|2005|2pp=109, 112|Bonekemper|2012|3pp=51, 58–59, 63–64}}{{efn|The April 6th fighting had been costly, with thousands of casualties. That evening, heavy rain set in. Sherman found Grant standing alone under a tree in the rain. "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day of it, haven't we?" Sherman said. "Yes," replied Grant. "Lick 'em tomorrow, though."{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=205}}}}
{{stack|

]
Bolstered by 18,000 troops from the divisions of Major Generals Buell and ], Grant counterattacked at dawn the next day and regained the field, forcing the disorganized and demoralized rebels to retreat to Corinth.{{sfnm|Bonekemper|2012|1pp=59, 63–64|Smith|2001|2p=206}} Halleck ordered Grant not to advance more than one day's march from Pittsburg Landing, stopping the pursuit.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=115–16}} Although Grant had won the battle, the situation was little changed.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=115}} Grant, now realizing that the South was determined to fight, would later write, "Then, indeed, I gave up all idea of saving the Union except by complete conquest."{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=187–88}}
] surrendered to Grant at the Appomatox Court House.]]

}}
Shiloh was the costliest battle in American history to that point and the staggering 23,746 casualties stunned the nation.{{sfnm|Bonekemper|2012|1p=94|White|2016|2p=221}} Briefly hailed a hero for routing the Confederates, Grant was soon mired in controversy.{{sfn|White|2016|pp=223–224}} The Northern press castigated Grant for shockingly high casualties, and accused him of drunkenness during the battle, contrary to the accounts of those with him at the time.{{sfnm|Kaplan|2015|1pp=1109–1119|White|2016|2pp=223–225}} Discouraged, Grant considered resigning but Sherman convinced him to stay.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=188–191|White|2016|2pp=230–231}} Lincoln dismissed Grant's critics, saying "I can't spare this man; he fights."{{sfn|White|2016|pp=225–226}} Grant's costly victory at Shiloh ended any chance for the Confederates to prevail in the Mississippi valley or regain its strategic advantage in the West.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=204|Barney|2011|2p=289}}
After Grant and the Army of the Potomac had crossed the James River undetected and rescued Maj. Gen. Butler from the Bermuda Hundred, Grant advanced the army southward to capture ]. Confederate General P.G.T. Beauregard, in charge of Petersburg, was able to defend the city and Lee's veteran reinforcements arrived. Grant forced Lee into a long nine-month siege of Petersburg and the war effort stalled.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=178}} Northern resentment grew as the war dragged on, but an indirect benefit of the Petersburg siege was found in preventing Lee from reinforcing armies to oppose Sherman and Sheridan.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=186}} During the siege, Sherman was able to take Atlanta, a victory that advanced President Lincoln's reelection. Maj. Gen. Sheridan was given command of the ] and directed to "follow the enemy to their death".{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=181}} Lee had sent General ] up the Shenandoah Valley to attack the federal capital and draw troops away from the Army of the Potomac, but Sheridan defeated Early, saving Washington from capture. Grant then ordered Sheridan's cavalry to destroy vital Confederate supply farms in the Shenandoah Valley. When Sheridan reported suffering attacks by irregular Confederate cavalry under ], Grant recommended rounding up their families for imprisonment as hostages at Ft. McHenry.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=181}}

Halleck arrived from St. Louis on April 11, took command, and assembled a combined army of about 120,000 men. On April 29, he relieved Grant of field command and replaced him with Major General ]. Halleck slowly marched his army to take Corinth, entrenching each night.{{sfn|White|2016|p=229}} Meanwhile, Beauregard pretended to be reinforcing, sent "deserters" to the Union Army with that story, and moved his army out during the night, to Halleck's surprise when he finally ] on May 30.{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=230|Groom|2012|2pp=363–364}}

Halleck divided his combined army and reinstated Grant as field commander on July 11.{{sfnm|Longacre|2006|1p=137|White|2016|2p=231}} Later that year, on September 19, Grant's army defeated Confederates at the ], then successfully ], inflicting heavy casualties.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=211–212}} On October 25, Grant assumed command of the District of the Tennessee.{{sfn|Badeau|1887|p=126}} In November, after Lincoln's preliminary ], Grant ordered units under his command to incorporate former slaves into the Union Army, giving them clothes, shelter, and wages for their services.{{sfn|Flood|2005|p=133}}

===Vicksburg campaign (1862–1863)===
{{further|Vicksburg Campaign|General Order No. 11 (1862)}}
].]]

The Union capture of ], the last Confederate stronghold on the ], was considered vital as it would split the Confederacy in two.{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=243|Miller|2019|2p=xii|Chernow|2017|3p=236}} Lincoln appointed McClernand for the job, rather than Grant or Sherman.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=221–223|Catton|2005|2p=112|Chernow|2017|3pp=236–237}} Halleck, who retained power over troop displacement, ordered McClernand to ], and placed him and his troops under Grant's authority.{{sfnm|Flood|2005|1pp=147–148|White|2016|2p=246|Chernow|2017|3pp=238–239}}

On November 13, 1862, Grant captured ] and advanced to ].{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=248|Chernow|2017|2pp=231–232}} His plan was to attack Vicksburg overland, while Sherman would attack Vicksburg from Chickasaw Bayou.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=239}} However, Confederate cavalry raids on December 11 and 20 broke Union communications and recaptured Holly Springs, preventing Grant and Sherman from converging on Vicksburg.{{sfnm|Catton|2005|1pp=119, 291|White|2016|2pp=248–249|Chernow|2017|3pp=239–241}} McClernand reached Sherman's army, assumed command, and independently of Grant led a campaign that captured Confederate ].{{sfn|Bonekemper|2012|pp=147–148}} After the sack of Holly Springs, Grant considered and sometimes adopted the strategy of foraging the land,{{sfn|Miller|2019|p=248}} rather than exposing long Union supply lines to enemy attack.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=244}}

Fugitive ] slaves poured into Grant's district, whom he sent north to Cairo to be domestic servants in Chicago. However, Lincoln ended this when Illinois political leaders complained.{{sfn|Miller|2019|pp=206–207}} On his own initiative, Grant set up a pragmatic program and hired Presbyterian chaplain ] to administer ] camps.{{sfn|Miller|2019|pp=206–209}} Freed slaves picked cotton that was shipped north to aid the Union war effort. Lincoln approved and Grant's program was successful.{{sfn|Miller|2019|pp=209–210}} Grant also worked freed black labor on ] to bypass Vicksburg, incorporating the laborers into the Union Army and Navy.{{sfnm|White|2016|pp=1246–1247|Miller|2019|2p=154–155}}

], fought on May 14, 1863, was part of the ].]]
Grant's war responsibilities included combating illegal Northern cotton trade and civilian obstruction.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=225|White|2016|2pp=235–36}}{{efn|Smuggling of cotton was rampant, while the price of cotton skyrocketed.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=232}} Grant believed the smuggling funded the Confederacy and provided them with military intelligence.{{sfnm|Flood|2005|1pp=143–144, 151|Sarna|2012a|2p=37|White|2016|3pp=235–236}}}} He had received numerous complaints about Jewish speculators in his district.{{sfn|Miller|2019|p=259}} The majority, however, of those involved in illegal trading were not Jewish.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=232–33|Howland|1868|2pp=123–24}} To help combat this, Grant required two permits, one from the Treasury and one from the Union Army, to purchase cotton.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=232}} On December 17, 1862, Grant issued a controversial ], expelling "Jews, as a class", from his military district.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1p=218|Shevitz|2005|2p=256}} After complaints, Lincoln rescinded the order on January 3, 1863. Grant finally ended the order on January 17. He later described issuing the order as one of his biggest regrets.{{efn|In 2012, historian ] said: "Gen. Ulysses S. Grant issued the most notorious anti-Jewish official order in American history."{{sfn|Sarna|2012b}} Grant made amends with the Jewish community during his presidency, appointing them to various federal positions.{{sfnm|Sarna|2012a|1pp=89, 147|White|2016|2p=494|Chernow|2017|3p=236}} In 2017, biographer Ron Chernow said of Grant: "As we shall see, Grant as president atoned for his action in a multitude of meaningful ways. He was never a bigoted, hate-filled man and was haunted by his terrible action for the rest of his days."{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=236}}}}{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=226–227}}

On January 29, 1863, Grant assumed overall command. To bypass Vicksburg's guns, Grant slowly advanced his Union army south through water-logged terrain.{{sfn|Bonekemper|2012|pp=148–149}} The plan of attacking Vicksburg from downriver was risky because, east of the river, his army would be distanced from most of its supply lines,{{sfn|White|2016|p=269}} and would have to rely on foraging. On April 16, Grant ordered Admiral ]'s gunboats south under fire from the Vicksburg batteries to meet up with troops who had marched south down the west side of the river.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=226–228}} Grant ordered diversionary battles, confusing Pemberton and allowing Grant's army to move east across the Mississippi.{{sfn|Flood|2005|p=160}} Grant's army ]. Advancing west, he defeated Pemberton's army at the ] on May 16, forcing their retreat into Vicksburg.{{sfn|Flood|2005|pp=164–165}}

After Grant's men assaulted the entrenchments twice, suffering severe losses, they settled in for ]. During quiet periods of the campaign, Grant would drink on occasion.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=231}} The personal rivalry between McClernand and Grant continued until Grant removed him from command when he contravened Grant by publishing an order without permission.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=136}} Pemberton surrendered Vicksburg to Grant on July 4, 1863.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=122–138|Smith|2001|2pp=206–257}}

Vicksburg's fall gave Union forces control of the Mississippi River and split the Confederacy. By that time, Grant's political sympathies fully coincided with the ]' aggressive prosecution of the war and emancipation of the slaves.{{sfn|Catton|1968|p=8}} The success at Vicksburg was a morale boost for the Union war effort.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=136}} When Stanton suggested Grant be brought east to run the ], Grant demurred, writing that he knew the geography and resources of the West better and he did not want to upset the chain of command in the East.{{sfn|Catton|1968|p=7}}

===Chattanooga (1863) and promotion===
{{further|Chattanooga Campaign}}
] and defeat Bragg's army.]]

On October 16, 1863, Lincoln promoted Grant to major general in the regular army and assigned him command of the newly formed ], which comprised the Armies of the ], the Tennessee, and the ].{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1p=265|Cullum|1891|2p=172|White|2016|3p=295}} After the ], the Army of the Cumberland retreated into Chattanooga, where they were partially besieged.{{sfn|Flood|2005|p=196}} Grant arrived in Chattanooga, where plans to resupply and break the partial siege had already been set. Forces commanded by Major General ], which had been sent from the Army of the Potomac, approached from the west and linked up with other units moving east from inside the city, capturing Brown's Ferry and opening a supply line to the railroad at Bridgeport.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=145–147|Smith|2001|2pp=267–268|Brands|2012a|3pp=267–268}}

Grant planned to have Sherman's Army of the Tennessee, assisted by the Army of the Cumberland, assault the northern end of ] and roll down it on the enemy's right flank. On November 23, Major General ] surprised the enemy in open daylight, advancing the Union lines and taking Orchard Knob, between Chattanooga and the ridge. The next day, Sherman failed to get atop Missionary Ridge, which was key to Grant's plan of battle. Hooker's forces took ] in unexpected success.{{sfn|Flood|2005|pp=214–215}} On the 25th, Grant ordered Thomas to advance to the rifle-pits at the base of Missionary Ridge after Sherman's army failed to take Missionary Ridge from the northeast.{{sfn|Flood|2005|p=216}} Four divisions of the Army of the Cumberland, with the center two led by Major General ] and Brigadier General ], chased the Confederates out of the rifle-pits at the base and, against orders, continued the charge up the 45-degree slope and captured the Confederate entrenchments along the crest, forcing a hurried retreat.{{sfn|Flood|2005|pp=217–218}} The decisive battle gave the Union control of Tennessee and opened ], the Confederate heartland, to Union invasion.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=148–150}}

On March 2, 1864, Lincoln promoted Grant to lieutenant general, giving him command of all Union Armies.{{sfnm|Flood|2005|1p=232|McFeely|1981|2p=148|Cullum|1891|3p=172}} Grant's new rank had previously been held only by ].{{sfn|White|2016|pp=313, 319}} Grant arrived in Washington on March 8 and was formally commissioned by Lincoln the next day at a Cabinet meeting.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=339, 342}} Grant developed a good working relationship with Lincoln, who allowed Grant to devise his own strategy.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=343–44, 352}}

Grant established his headquarters with General ]'s Army of the Potomac in ], and met weekly with Lincoln and Stanton in Washington.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=156|Chernow|2017|2p=352}} After protest from Halleck, Grant scrapped a risky invasion of North Carolina and planned five coordinated Union offensives to prevent Confederate armies from shifting troops along interior lines.{{sfnm|Wheelan|2014|1p=20|Simon|2002|2p=243|Chernow|2017|3pp=356–357}} Grant and Meade would make a direct frontal attack on ]'s ], while Sherman—now in command of all western armies—would destroy ]'s ] and take Atlanta.{{sfnm|Catton|2005|1pp=190, 193|Wheelan|2014|2p=20|Chernow|2017|3pp=348, 356–357}} Major General ] would advance on Lee from the southeast, up the ], while Major General ] would capture ].{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=157|Wheelan|2014|2p=20|Chernow|2017|3p=356–357}} Major General ] was to capture granaries and rail lines in the fertile ].{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=157–175|Smith|2001|2pp=313–339, 343–368|Wheelan|2014|3p=20|Chernow|2017|4pp=356–57}} Grant now commanded 533,000 battle-ready troops spread out over an eighteen-mile front.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=355}}

===Overland Campaign (1864)===
{{main article|Overland Campaign}}

The Overland Campaign was a series of brutal battles fought in Virginia during May and June 1864.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=378}} Sigel's and Butler's efforts failed, and Grant was left alone to fight Lee.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=396–97}} On May 4, Grant led the army from his headquarters towards Germanna Ford.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=303, 314|Chernow|2017|2pp=376–77}} They crossed the ] unopposed.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=314|Chernow|2017|2pp=376–77}} On May 5, the Union army attacked Lee in the ], a three-day battle with estimated casualties of 17,666 Union and 11,125 Confederate.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=378–79, 384|Bonekemper|2012|2p=463}}

Rather than retreat, Grant flanked Lee's army to the southeast and attempted to wedge his forces between Lee and Richmond at ].{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=165}} Lee's army got to Spotsylvania first and a costly battle ensued, lasting thirteen days, with heavy casualties.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=385–87, 394–95|Bonekemper|2012|2p=463}} On May 12, Grant attempted to break through Lee's ''Muleshoe'' salient guarded by Confederate artillery, resulting in one of the bloodiest assaults of the Civil War, known as ].{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=389, 392–95}} Unable to break Lee's lines, Grant again flanked the rebels to the southeast, meeting at ], where a battle lasted three days.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=169}}

====Cold Harbor====
{{main article|Battle of Cold Harbor}}
], June 1864]]

The recent bloody Wilderness campaign had severely diminished Confederate morale;{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=403–04|Bonekemper|2011|pp=41–42}} Grant believed breaking through Lee's lines at its weakest point, ], a vital road hub that linked to Richmond, would mean a quick end to the war.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=170–171|Furgurson|2007|2p=235|Chernow|2017|3p=403}} Grant already had two corps in position at Cold Harbor with Hancock's corps on the way.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=403}}

Lee's lines were extended north and east of Richmond and Petersburg for approximately ten miles, but at several points there were no fortifications built yet, including Cold Harbor. On June 1 and 2 both Grant and Lee were waiting for reinforcements to arrive. Hancock's men had marched all night and arrived too exhausted for an immediate attack that morning. Grant postponed the attack until 5 p.m., and then again until 4:30&nbsp;a.m. on June 3. However, Grant and Meade did not give specific orders for the attack, leaving it up to the corps commanders to coordinate. Grant had not yet learned that overnight Lee had hastily constructed entrenchments to thwart any breach attempt at Cold Harbor.{{sfn|Furgurson|2007|pp=120–21}} Grant was anxious to make his move before the rest of Lee's army arrived. On the morning of June 3, with a force of more than 100,000 men, against Lee's 59,000, Grant attacked, not realizing that Lee's army was now well entrenched, much of it obscured by trees and bushes.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=403–04}} Grant's army suffered 12,000–14,000 casualties, while Lee's army suffered 3,000–5,000 casualties, but Lee was less able to replace them.{{sfn|Bonekemper|2011|pp=41–42}}

The unprecedented number of casualties heightened anti-war sentiment in the North. After the battle, Grant wanted to appeal to Lee under the white flag for each side to gather up their wounded, most of them Union soldiers, but Lee insisted that a total truce be enacted and while they were deliberating all but a few of the wounded died in the field.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=406–07}} Without giving an apology for the disastrous defeat in his official military report, Grant confided in his staff after the battle and years later wrote in his memoirs that he "regretted that the last assault at Cold Harbor was ever made."{{sfnm|Bonekemper|2010|1p=182|Chernow|2017|2p=407}}

===Siege of Petersburg (1864–1865)===
{{further|Siege of Petersburg|Battle of the Crater}}

Undetected by Lee, Grant moved his army south of the James River, freed Butler from ], and advanced toward ], Virginia's central railroad hub,{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=157–175|Smith|2001|2pp=313–339, 343–368}} resulting in ]. Northern resentment grew. Sheridan was assigned command of the ] and Grant directed him to "follow the enemy to their death" in the Shenandoah Valley.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=178–186}} After Grant's abortive attempt to capture Petersburg, Lincoln supported Grant in his decision to continue.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1p=414|White|2016|2pp=369–370}}

Grant had to commit troops to check Confederate General ]'s raids in the Shenandoah Valley, which were getting dangerously close to Washington.{{sfn|Catton|1968|p=309}} By late July, at Petersburg, Grant reluctantly approved a plan to ] part of the enemy trenches from a tunnel filled with gunpowder. The massive explosion instantly killed an entire Confederate regiment.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=429}} The poorly led Union troops under Major General ] and Brigadier General ], rather than encircling the crater, rushed into it. Recovering from the surprise, Confederates, led by Major General ],{{sfn|Catton|1968|p=324}} surrounded the crater and easily picked off Union troops. The Union's 3,500 casualties outnumbered the Confederates' three-to-one. The battle marked the first time that Union black troops, who endured a large proportion of the casualties, engaged in any major battle in the east.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=398}} Grant admitted that the tactic had been a "stupendous failure".{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=179|Smith|2001|2pp=369–395|Catton|1968|3pp=308–309}}

] (far left) and Admiral ] (right) – '']'' by ], 1868]]

Grant would later meet with Lincoln and testify at a court of inquiry against Generals Burnside and Ledlie for their incompetence.{{sfn|Catton|1968|p=325}} In his memoirs, he blamed them for that disastrous Union defeat.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=430}} Rather than fight Lee in a full-frontal attack as he had done at Cold Harbor, Grant continued to force Lee to extend his defenses south and west of Petersburg, better allowing him to capture essential railroad links.{{sfn|Catton|1968|p=309}}

Union forces soon captured ] and ] and now controlled the Shenandoah Valley, ensuring Lincoln's reelection in November.{{sfnm|Catton|2005|1pp=223, 228|Smith|2001|2p=387}} Sherman convinced Grant and Lincoln to allow his army to ].{{sfnm|Catton|2005|1p=235|Smith|2001|2pp=388–389}} Sherman cut a {{convert|60|mi|adj=on}} path of destruction unopposed, reached the Atlantic Ocean, and captured Savannah on December 22.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=388–389}} On December 16, after much prodding by Grant, the Union Army under Thomas smashed ]'s Confederates at ].{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=389–390}} These campaigns left Lee's forces at Petersburg as the only significant obstacle remaining to Union victory.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=390}}

By March 1865, Lee was trapped and his strength severely weakened.{{sfn|Bonekemper|2012|p=359}} He was running out of reserves to replace the high battlefield casualties and remaining Confederate troops, no longer having confidence in their commander and under the duress of trench warfare, deserted by the thousands.{{sfn|Bonekemper|2012|p=353}} On March 25, in a desperate effort, Lee sacrificed his remaining troops (4,000 Confederate casualties) at ], a Union victory and the last Petersburg line battle.


===Surrender of Lee and Union victory (1865)===
Grant attempted to blow up part of Lee's Petersburg trenches from an underground tunnel, but the explosion created a crater from which Confederates could easily pick off Union troops below. The 3500 Union casualties outnumbered the Confederates' by three-to-one; Grant admitted the tactic had been a "stupendous failure."{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1p=179|Smith||2pp=369–95}} On August 9, 1864, Grant, who had just arrived at his headquarters in ], narrowly escaped death when Confederate spies blew up an ammunition barge moored below the city's bluffs.{{sfn|Catton 1968|p=349}} As the war slowly progressed, Grant continued to extend Lee's entrenchment defenses southwest of Petersburg, in an effort to capture vital railroad links. By August 21, the Union had captured the ]. As Grant continued to push the Union advance westward towards the ], Lee's entrenchment lines became overstretched and undermanned. After the Federal army rebuilt the ], Grant was able to use mortars to attack Lee's entrenchments.
{{main|Third Battle of Petersburg|Appomattox Campaign|Battle of Appomattox Court House}}
]


On April 2, Grant ordered a general assault on Lee's forces; Lee abandoned Petersburg and Richmond, which Grant captured.{{sfn|Bonekemper|2012|pp=365–366}} A desperate Lee and part of his army attempted to link up with the remnants of ]'s army. Sheridan's cavalry stopped the two armies from converging, cutting them off from their supply trains.{{sfn|White|2016|pp=403–404}} Grant sent his aide ] to carry his last dispatch to Lee demanding his surrender.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=401–403}} Grant immediately rode west, bypassing Lee's army, to join Sheridan who had captured ], blocking Lee's escape route. On his way, Grant received a letter from Lee stating Lee would surrender his army.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1p=504|Smith|2001|2pp=401–03}}
Once Sherman reached the East Coast and Thomas dispatched Hood in Tennessee, Union victory appeared certain, and Lincoln resolved to attempt a negotiated end to the war with the Confederates. He enlisted ] to carry a message to Confederate President ]. Davis and Lincoln each appointed commissioners, but the conference soon stalled. Grant contacted Lincoln, who agreed to personally meet with the commissioners at ]. The peace conference was ultimately fruitless, but Grant had shown his willingness and ability to assume a diplomatic role beyond his normal military posture.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=198–210}}


On April 9, Grant and Lee met at ].{{sfn|White|2016|p=405}} Although Grant felt depressed at the fall of "a foe who had fought so long and valiantly," he believed the Southern cause was "one of the worst for which a people ever fought."{{sfnm|Smith|2001|2p=404}} Grant wrote out the terms of surrender: "each officer and man will be allowed to return to his home, not to be disturbed by U.S. authority so long as they observe their paroles and the laws in force where they may reside." Lee immediately accepted Grant's terms and signed the surrender document, without any diplomatic recognition of the Confederacy. Lee asked that his former Confederate troops keep their horses, which Grant generously allowed.{{sfn|White|2016|pp=405–406}}{{sfnm|Goethals|2015|1p=92|Smith|2001|2p=405}} Grant ordered his troops to stop all celebration, saying the "war is over; the rebels are our countrymen again."{{sfn|White|2016|p=407}} Johnston's Tennessee army surrendered on April 26, 1865, ] Alabama army on May 4, and ] Texas army on May 26, ending the war.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=212, 219–220|Catton|2005|2p=304|Chernow|2017|3p=510}}
In March 1865, while Lincoln met at City Point with Grant, Sherman, and Porter, Union forces finally took Petersburg and captured Richmond in April. Lee's troops began deserting in large numbers; disease and lack of supplies also weakened Lee's forces.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=212}} Lee attempted to link up with the remnants of Confederate General ]'s defeated army; however, Union cavalry forces led by Sheridan were able to stop the two armies from converging. Lee and his army surrendered to Grant at ] on April 9, 1865. Grant gave generous terms; Confederate troops surrendered their weapons and were allowed to return to their homes, with their mounts, on the condition that they would not take up arms against the United States. Within a few weeks the Civil War was over.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=219–20}}


===Lincoln's assassination=== ===Lincoln's assassination===
{{main|Assassination of Abraham Lincoln}} {{main|Assassination of Abraham Lincoln|}}
On April 14, five days after Grant's victory at Appomattox, Lincoln was fatally shot by ] and died the next morning. The assassination was part of a conspiracy that targeted a number of government leaders.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=224}} Grant attended a cabinet meeting that day, and Lincoln had invited Grant and his wife to the theater, but they declined, as they had plans to travel to Philadelphia. Many, including Grant, thought him to have been a target in the plot; an unknown assailant allegedly failed in an attempt to break into Grant's railroad car.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=375–376}} Stanton, through Dana, notified Grant of the President's death and summoned him to Washington. For security purposes a scapegoat engine preceded Grant's train on the return trip. The following day Grant hastily ordered arrests of paroled Confederate officers. Maj. Gen. ], however, was able to narrow the existing threats in Washington through the use of ] and persuaded Grant to reverse his arrest orders.{{sfn|McFeely 1981| p=225}} Attending Lincoln's funeral on April 19, Grant stood alone and wept openly. He said of Lincoln, "He was incontestably the greatest man I have ever known."{{sfn|Smith|pp=409–412}} Regarding the new President, ], Grant commented to Julia that he dreaded the change in administrations; he judged Johnson's attitude toward white southerners as one that would "make them unwilling citizens", and initially thought that with Johnson, "Reconstruction has been set back no telling how far."{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=227–229}} On April 14, 1865, Grant attended a cabinet meeting in Washington. Lincoln invited him and his wife Julia to ] but they declined, because they planned to travel to their home in ]. In a conspiracy that also targeted top cabinet members in one last effort to topple the Union, Lincoln was shot by ] at the theater and died the next morning.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=224|White|2016|2p=412}} Many, including Grant himself, thought that Grant had been a target in the plot, and during the subsequent trial, the government tried to prove that Grant had been stalked by Booth's conspirator ].{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=375–376}} Stanton notified Grant of the president's death and summoned him to Washington. Vice President ] was ] as president on April 15.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=409–412}}{{efn|Attending Lincoln's funeral on April 19, Grant stood alone and wept openly; he later said Lincoln was "the greatest man I have ever known".{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=409–412}}}} Grant was determined to work with Johnson, and he privately expressed "every reason to hope" in the new president's ability to run the government "in its old channel".{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=227–229|White|2016|2p=414}}


==Commanding generalship (1865–1869)==
Later in April, Sherman, without consulting Washington, concluded an agreement with Confederate Gen. Joseph E. Johnston to effect the latter's surrender, believing it to be consistent with Lincoln's recent statements to him at City Point. Stanton and Grant quickly surmised the terms were much too lenient. Stanton even declared so publicly with scorn for Sherman; Grant, concerned that his lead commander's mistake not be mishandled, requested a cabinet meeting to discuss the problem, and offered to personally deliver the message of repudiation to Sherman. Grant handled the matter adroitly and made the most of their friendship, conveying the message to Sherman and ultimately getting his consent to renegotiate the agreement in accordance with the terms at Appomattox.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=227–229}}
{{main|Commanding generalship of Ulysses S. Grant}}
]'s portrait of General Grant, 1866]]


At the war's end, Grant remained commander of the army, with duties that included dealing with ] and French troops in Mexico, enforcement of Reconstruction in the former Confederate states, and supervision of Indian wars on the western Plains.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=410–411|Chernow|2017|2pp=556–557}} After the ], Lee and his generals were indicted for treason in Virginia. Johnson demanded they be put on trial, but Grant insisted that they should not be tried, citing his Appomatox amnesty. Charges against Lee were dropped.{{sfn|White|2016|p=418}}{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=417–418}} Grant secured a house for his family in Georgetown Heights in 1865 but instructed Elihu Washburne that for political purposes his legal residence remained in Galena, Illinois.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=232–233}} On July 25, 1866, Congress promoted Grant to the newly created rank of ].{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=434n}}
==Peacetime general==


===Celebrations and honors=== ===Tour of the South===
{{further|Reconstruction era}}
] of Ulysses S. Grant, in ].]]
In May 1865, the ] purchased the Grants a house in that city, but Grant's work was in Washington. He attempted to commute for a time and return on the weekends, but he and Julia moved to Washington that October.{{sfn|Smith|p=419}} They secured a place in Georgetown Heights, while Grant instructed his Washburne that, politically, his legal residence remained in Galena, Illinois.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=232–33}} That year, Grant appeared at ] in New York; the ''New York Times'' described the reception for the war hero: "...the enhanced and bewildered multitude trembled with extraordinary delight."{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=234}} Further travels that summer, with repeated enthusiastic receptions, took the Grants to Albany and back to Galena and throughout Illinois and Ohio. On July 25, 1866, Congress promoted Grant to the newly created rank of ].{{sfn|Smith|p=434n}}


President Johnson's Reconstruction policy included a speedy return of the former Confederates to Congress, reinstating white people to office in the South, and relegating black people to second-class citizenship.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=10}} On November 27, 1865, Grant was sent by Johnson on a fact-finding mission to the South, to counter a pending less favorable report by Senator ] which reported that white people in the South harbored resentment of the North, and that black people suffered from violence and fraud.{{sfn|Simpson|1988|pp=433–434}} Grant recommended continuation of the ], which Johnson opposed, but advised against using black troops.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=420|McFeely|1981|2pp=238–241}}
Grant was the most popular man in the country.{{sfn|Smith|pp=369–397}} When Johnson argued with Congress over Reconstruction, he took his case to the people with his "swing around the circle." Johnson sought to capitalize on Grant's popularity by having the general travel with him.{{sfn|Smith|pp=369–397}} Grant, wishing to appear loyal, agreed to accompany Johnson; however he confided in his wife that he thought Johnson's speeches were a "national disgrace". Grant continued his efforts to appear loyal while not alienating Republican legislators essential to his future.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=242–251}} At the same time, Johnson also suspected Grant to be a potential candidate in the ], and decided to replace Secretary of War Stanton with Grant or Sherman. Grant discussed the matter with Sherman and convinced him to avoid the politically troubled president.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=242–251}}


Grant believed the people of the South were not ready for self-rule and required federal government protection. Concerned that the war led to diminished respect for civil authorities, he continued using the Army to maintain order.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=390}} Grant's report on the South, which he later recanted, sympathized with Johnson's Reconstruction policies.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=565–566}} Although Grant desired former Confederates be returned to Congress, he advocated eventual black citizenship. On December 19, the day after the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment was announced in the Senate, Johnson's response used Grant's report, read aloud to the Senate, to undermine Schurz's final report and Radical opposition to Johnson's policies.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=240–241|Smith|2001|2pp=420–421|Chernow|2017|3pp=565–566|Simpson|1988|4p=439}}
===Congressional reconstruction===
]
{{main|Reconstruction Era of the United States}}
After the speaking tour, Johnson sent Grant on a fact-finding mission to the South, after which he filed a report recommending continuation of a reformed ], that Johnson opposed, but against the use of black troops in garrisons that he believed were encouraging an alternative to farm labor.{{sfnm|Brands 2012a||1p=390|Smith||2p=420|McFeely 1981||3pp=238–241}} Grant did not believe the people of the devastated South were ready for self-rule and required further U.S. military occupation.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=390}} Grant stated that both whites and blacks in the South required the protection of the U.S. federal government.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=390}} Grant also warned of threats by disaffected poor people, black and white, and recommended that local decision making be entrusted only to "thinking men of the South" (''i.e.,'' men of property.){{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=238, 240}} In this respect, Grant's initial Reconstruction policy aligned with Johnson's policy of pardoning established southern leaders and restoring them to their positions of power.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1p=240|Smith||2p=420}} He joined Johnson in arguing that Congress should allow congressional representatives from the South to be seated.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=240–241}}


===Break from Johnson===
In 1866, an intraparty fight arose in Maryland that threatened to devolve into a riot. John Lee Chapman, the Radical mayor of Baltimore, had been elected in 1862 in an election in which the police commissioners had allegedly turned Conservative voters away from the polls.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=254–256}} Four years later, Maryland's governor, ], a Johnson supporter, threatened to remove the commissioners and appoint his own, which Radicals believed would result in their own disenfranchisement. Grant was reluctant to send federal troops into a loyal state; instead he traveled to the city himself as a private citizen and arranged a settlement that would allow both groups' poll watchers to ensure fair elections.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=254–256}}
], suggesting that Grant was a bigger draw on the multi-city tour than was Johnson ]]
Grant was initially optimistic about Johnson.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=533–534}} Despite differing styles, the two got along cordially and Grant attended cabinet meetings concerning Reconstruction.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=533–534}} By February 1866, the relationship began to break down.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=569}} Johnson opposed Grant's closure of the '']'' for disloyal editorials and his enforcement of the ], passed over Johnson's veto.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=569}} Needing Grant's popularity, Johnson took Grant on his "]" tour, a failed attempt to gain national support for lenient policies toward the South.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1p=396|Simon|2002|2p=244}} Grant privately called Johnson's speeches a "national disgrace" and he left the tour early.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=397–398}} On March 2, 1867, overriding Johnson's veto, Congress passed the first of three ], using military officers to enforce the policy.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=432–433|Simon|2002|2p=244}} Protecting Grant, Congress passed the Command of the Army Act, preventing his removal or relocation, and forcing Johnson to pass orders through Grant.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=438|Simon|2002|2p=244}}


In August 1867, bypassing the ], Johnson discharged Secretary of War ] without Senate approval and appointed Grant ''ad interim'' Secretary of War. Stanton was the only remaining cabinet member friendly to the Radicals. Although Grant initially recommended against dismissing Stanton, he accepted the position, not wanting the Army to fall under a conservative appointee who would impede Reconstruction, and managed an uneasy partnership with Johnson.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=244|Chernow|2017|2pp=594–95}}
The Baltimore tumult was just the prelude for the conflict between Radicals and Conservatives over the Reconstruction of the South. Rejecting Johnson's vision for quick reconciliation with former Confederates, Congress passed the Reconstruction Acts, divided the southern states into five military districts run by the army to ensure that freedmen's constitutional and congressional rights were protected. Transitional state governments in each district were to be led by military governors general. Grant, who was to select the general to govern each district, preferred Congress's plan for enforcement of Reconstruction.{{sfn|Smith|pp=432–433}} Grant was optimistic Reconstruction Acts would help pacify the South.{{sfn|Smith|pp=434–435}} He carried out his duty under the Acts and instructed the generals to do likewise, further alienating Johnson; when Sheridan removed public officials in Louisiana who impeded Reconstruction, Johnson was especially displeased and sought Sheridan's removal.{{sfn|Smith|pp=436–439}} Grant stayed the middle course, and recommended a rebuke but not a dismissal.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=259–261}} Throughout the Reconstruction period, more than 1,500 ], while Grant and the military protected their rights by overturning the first ] in 1867.{{sfn|Smith|pp=421, 433}}


In December 1867, Congress voted to keep Stanton, who was reinstated by a Senate Committee on January 10, 1868. Grant told Johnson he was going to resign the office to avoid fines and imprisonment. Johnson, who believed the law would be overturned, said he would assume Grant's legal responsibility, and reminded Grant that he had promised to delay his resignation until a suitable replacement was found.{{sfn|White|2016|p=453}} The following Monday, not willing to wait for the law to be overturned, Grant surrendered the office to Stanton, causing confusion with Johnson.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=603}} With the backing of his cabinet, Johnson accused Grant of lying and "duplicity" at a stormy cabinet meeting, while a shocked and disappointed Grant felt it was Johnson who was lying.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=35–36}} The publication of angry messages between Grant and Johnson led to a complete break between them.{{sfnm|White|2016|1pp=454–455|Simon|2002|2pp=244}} The controversy led to Johnson's ] and trial in the Senate; he was acquitted by one vote.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=244|Chernow|2017|2p=611}} Grant's popularity rose among the Radical Republicans and his nomination for the presidency appeared certain.{{sfnm|White|2016|1pp=458–59|Simon|2002|2p=244}}
===Mexico and Canada===
Grant, as commanding general, immediately had to contend with ] and the French army that had taken over Mexico with the help of ]. Most Americans felt this to be a violation of the ]. Johnson told Grant to put military pressure on the French to leave Mexico by sending 50,000 troops to the Texas border under Sheridan. Grant told Sheridan to do whatever he could, within the bounds of neutrality, to force Maximilian's abdicatation and get the French Army to leave Mexico. Sheridan sent ], the ousted leader of Mexico, 60,000 rifles.{{sfn|Smith|p=421n}} In a cabinet meeting, Johnson suggested Grant be assigned to the Mexican frontier as a way of removing him from the political mainstream. Grant immediately recognized the nature of this proposal, and refused. As a compromise Grant sent Sherman (now promoted to Lieutenant General) in his place.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=257}} By 1866, the French Army completely withdrew from Mexico; Maximilian was executed by Juárez in 1867.{{sfn|Smith|p=415}}


===Election of 1868===
After the Civil War, thousands of ] joined the ] with the intention of invading and holding Canada hostage in exchange for Irish independence. In June 1866, Johnson sent Grant to Buffalo, New York, to assess the situation. He ordered the Canadian border closed to prevent Fenian soldiers from crossing over at ] and that more weapons be confiscated. In June 1866, the United States Army arrested 700 Fenian troops at Buffalo and the Fenians gave up on their attempt to invade Canada.{{sfnm|Smith||1pp=508–509|Hesseltine||2pp=229–230}}
{{main|1868 United States presidential election}}
]


At the ], the delegates unanimously nominated Grant for president on the first ballot and Speaker of the House ] for vice president on the fifth.{{sfn|Simon|2002|p=244}} Although Grant had preferred to remain in the army, he accepted the Republican nomination, believing that he was the only one who could unify the nation.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=244|Chernow|2017|2p=614}} The Republicans advocated "equal civil and political rights to all" and ] enfranchisement.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Peters|first1=Gerhard|last2=Woolley|first2=John T.|title=Republican Party Platform of 1868|url=https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/republican-party-platform-1868|work=The American Presidency Project|year=2018a|publisher=University of California, Santa Barbara}}</ref> The Democrats, having abandoned Johnson, nominated former governor ] of New York for president and ] of Missouri for vice president. The Democrats opposed suffrage for African Americans and advocated the immediate restoration of former Confederate states to the Union and amnesty from "all past political offenses".<ref>{{cite web|last1=Peters|first1=Gerhard|last2=Woolley|first2=John T.|title=Democratic Party Platform of 1868|url=https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/1868-democratic-party-platform|work=The American Presidency Project|year=2018b|publisher=University of California, Santa Barbara}}</ref>{{sfn|Simon|2002|pp=244–45}}
===Johnson's impeachment===
]
Johnson had for some time wished to replace Stanton, who sympathized with Congressional Reconstruction, as Secretary of War and asked Grant to take the post in an effort to keep Grant under his control as a potential political rival. Grant's reply was a recommendation against the move, in light of the ] which required Senate approval of any removal of a cabinet appointment. Johnson forced the issue by making it an interim appointment during a Senate recess. Grant relented and agreed to accept the post temporarily, lest he be rendered irrelevant politically.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=262–64}} Later when the Senate reinstated Stanton, Johnson requested Grant refuse to surrender the office to Stanton and let the courts resolve the matter. Instead, Grant stepped aside and incurred Johnson's wrath during a cabinet meeting immediately afterwards for allegedly breaking a promise not to do so. Grant disputed that he had ever made such a promise.{{sfn|Smith|pp=448–451}} Johnson's true frustration was with Grant's taking the Radicals' side. On January 14, 1868, newspapers friendly to Johnson published a series of articles in an attempt to discredit Grant over returning the War Department to Stanton, stating Grant had been deceptive in the matter.{{sfn|Smith|pp=448–451}} Grant defended himself in a written response to the President, which became public; Grant thereby increased his national popularity and emerged from the controversy unscathed.{{sfn|Smith|pp=448–451}} He also took no role apart from subsequent ]; none of the principals in the matter benefited from it.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=275}}


Grant played no overt role during the campaign and was joined by Sherman and Sheridan in a tour of the West that summer.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=46}} However, the Republicans adopted his words "Let us have peace" as their campaign slogan.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=264–267}} Grant's 1862 ] became an issue during the ]; he sought to distance himself from the order, saying "I have no prejudice against sect or race, but want each individual to be judged by his own merit."{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=459–460}} The Democrats and their Klan supporters focused mainly on ending Reconstruction, intimidating black people and Republicans, and returning control of the South to the white Democrats and the planter class, alienating ] in the North.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=468–469}} Grant won the popular vote and an ] landslide of 214 votes to Seymour's 80.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=461}} Seymour received a majority of white voters, but Grant was aided by 500,000 votes cast by black people,{{sfn|Simon|2002|p=245}} winning him 52.7 percent of the popular vote.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=55}} He lost Louisiana and Georgia, primarily due to ] violence against African-American voters.{{sfn|Foner|2014|pp=243–44}} At the age of 46, Grant was the youngest president yet elected.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=284|Smith|2001|2p=461|White|2016|3p=471}}
==1868 presidential campaign==
{{main|United States presidential election, 1868}}


==Presidency (1869–1877)==
Grant entered the 1868 campaign season with increased popularity among the Radical Republicans following his abandonment of Johnson.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=264–267}} Grant was chosen as the Republican presidential candidate on the first ballot at the ] in Chicago. He faced no significant opposition. In his letter of acceptance to the party, Grant concluded with "Let us have peace," which became his campaign slogan.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=264–267}} For vice president, the delegates nominated House Speaker ]. As was common practice at the time, Grant remained at home in Galena during the campaign, and left most of the active campaigning and speaking on his behalf to his campaign manager ] and others.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=282–284}} Grant's ] and antisemitism became an issue during the 1868 ]. Grant sought to distance himself from the order, saying "I have no prejudice against sect or race, but want each individual to be judged by his own merit."{{sfn|Smith|pp=459–460}}
{{main|Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant}}
], 1875]]
On March 4, 1869, Grant was sworn in as President by Chief Justice ]. In his inaugural address, Grant urged the ratification of the ]; many African Americans attended his inauguration.{{sfn|White|2016|p=472}} He urged that bonds issued during the Civil War should be paid in gold, called for "proper treatment" of ] and encouraged their "civilization and ultimate citizenship".{{sfnm|Patrick|1968|1p=166|McFeely|1981|2p=305|Simon|2002|3pp=246, 250}}


Grant's ] sparked both criticism and approval.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=465–466|White|2016|2pp=475, 530|Chernow|2017|3pp=635–636|Simon|2002|4p=246}} He appointed ] Secretary of State and ] Secretary of War.{{sfn|Simon|2002|pp=246–47}} Washburne resigned, and Grant appointed him Minister to France. Grant then appointed former New York Senator ] Secretary of State.{{sfn|Simon|2002|pp=246–47}} Rawlins died in office, and Grant appointed ] Secretary of War.{{sfnm|White|2016|1pp=507, 564|Simon|2002|2pp=246–247}} Grant appointed New York businessman ] Secretary of Treasury, but Stewart was found legally ineligible by a 1789 law.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=45}} Grant then appointed Massachusetts Representative ] Secretary of Treasury.{{sfn|Simon|2002|pp=246–47}} Philadelphia businessman ] was appointed Secretary of Navy, but found the job stressful and resigned.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=48}} Grant then appointed New Jersey's attorney general, ], Secretary of Navy.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1p=628|Simon|2002|2pp=246–247|Kahan|2018|3p=48}} Former Ohio Governor ] (Interior), former Maryland Senator ] (Postmaster-General), and ] (Attorney General) rounded out the cabinet.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=446, 469–470|Kahan|2018|2pp=47–48}}
The Democrats nominated former New York Governor ]. The Democrats' campaign focused mainly on ending Reconstruction and returning control of the South to the white planter class, which alienated many ] in the North.{{sfn|Smith|pp=468–469}} The Democrats attacked Reconstruction and the Republican Party's support of African American rights, while Grant was called captain of the "Black Marines".{{sfn|McFeely|pages=278, 283}} Grant was slapped in the face with a hat by a white supremacist, while courting black votes in Illinois.{{sfn|McFeely|page=278}} In the ], Grant won by 300,000 votes out of 5,716,082 votes cast. Grant received an ] landslide, getting 214 votes to Seymour's 80. When he assumed the presidency, Grant had never before held elected office and, at the age of forty-six, was the youngest person elected president to date. Grant was the first president elected after the nation had outlawed slavery and given citizenship to former slaves. Implementation of these new rights was slow to come; in the 1868 election, the black vote counted in only sixteen of the thirty-seven states.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=284}}


Grant nominated Sherman to succeed him as general-in-chief and gave him control over war bureau chiefs.{{sfn|White|2016|pp=474–75}} When Rawlins took over the War Department he complained that Sherman was given too much authority. Grant reluctantly revoked his order, upsetting Sherman and damaging their friendship. ], a former Confederate general, was nominated for Surveyor of Customs of New Orleans; this was met with amazement, and seen as a genuine effort to unite the North and South.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=472|White|2016|2pp=474–475}} In March 1872, Grant signed legislation that established ], the first national park.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=376}} Grant was sympathetic to women's rights, including suffrage, saying he wanted "equal rights to all citizens".{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=749–50|Kahan|2018|2p=xii|Calhoun|2017|3pp=384–85}}
==Presidency 1869–1877==
{{Main|Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant}}
]
Grant's presidency began with a break from tradition, as Johnson declined to ride in Grant's carriage or attend the inauguration at the Capitol. In his Inaugural Address, Grant advocated the passage of the Fifteenth Amendment and said he would approach Reconstruction "calmly, without prejudice, hate or sectional pride."{{sfn|Patrick|p=166}} Grant took an unorthodox approach to his cabinet choices, declining to consult with the Senate and keeping his choices secret until he submitted them for confirmation. {{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1p=286|Smith||2pp=465–66}} Grant purposely avoided choosing Republican Party leaders in an effort to create national harmony.{{sfn|Simon 2002|p=247}} Out of personal loyalty Grant appointed his friends, Elihu B. Washburne to the State Department and ] as Secretary of War. Washburne served twelve days in office then, in an apparently agreed-upon arrangement, resigned due to "sickness", and was appointed Minister to France.{{sfn|Smith|pp=470–71}} Grant then appointed ], a conservative New York statesman, Secretary of State. Fish would be Grant's most successful appointment.{{sfn|Simon 2002|p=247}} His relationship with Fish grew out of a strong friendship between the two men's wives.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=296}} Rawlins later died of ] and was replaced by ].{{sfn|Simon 2002|pp=246–247}} Grant selected several non-politicians to his cabinet including ] and ], with limited success. Borie served briefly as Secretary of Navy, replaced by ], while Stewart was lawfully prevented from becoming Secretary of Treasury by a 1789 statute and by Senator ]'s and Senator ]'s opposition to amend the law.{{sfn|Smith|pp=470–472}} In place of Stewart, Grant appointed ], known for his integrity, as Secretary of Treasury.{{sfn|Smith|pp=470–472}} Grant's other cabinet appointments, ] (Interior), ] (Postmaster General), and ] (Attorney General), were well-received and uncontroversial.{{sfn|Smith|pp=469–470}} To break from Washington, in 1869, Grant's family at the invitation of wealthy backers, vacationed for the first time in what became known as the "summer capital" and "the resort of presidents", ], where Grant returned often throughout his life.{{sfn|Perry|pp=53–54}}


To make up for his infamous General Order No. 11, Grant appointed more than fifty Jewish people to federal office, including consuls, district attorneys, and deputy postmasters. He appointed ] territorial governor of Washington, the first time an American Jewish man occupied a governor's seat. In November 1869, reports surfaced of ] penalizing 2,000 Jewish families for smuggling by expelling them to the interior of the country. In response, Grant publicly supported the Jewish American ''B'nai B'rith'' petition against Alexander.{{sfnm|Kahan|2018|1p=76|Chernow|2017|2pp=643–44|Sarna|2012a|3pp=ix–xiv}} In 1875, Grant proposed a constitutional amendment that limited religious indoctrination in public schools.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=512}} Schools would be for all children "irrespective of sex, color, birthplace, or religions".{{sfnm|Calhoun|2017|1pp=512–513|Smith|2001|2p=570}} Grant's views were incorporated into the ], but it was defeated by the Senate.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=513}}
===Later Reconstruction and civil rights===
]
Reconstruction of the South continued as Grant took office in 1869. By 1870, the four remaining former Confederate states were successfully restored into the United States.{{sfn|Badeau|p=256}} He lobbied Congress to pass the ], guaranteeing that no state could prevent someone from voting based on his race, and believed that its passage would secure the freedmen's rights.{{sfn|Smith|p=543}} To enforce the new amendment, Grant relied on the army and the newly created ]. In 1870, Grant signed a bill proposed by ] of Rhode Island establishing the ], to see that federal laws were enforced in the South when state courts and prosecutors were reluctant to do so. Where the attorney general had once been only a legal adviser to the president, he now led a cabinet department dedicated to enforcing federal law, including a ] assist him.{{sfn|Smith|pp=544–545}} Under Grant's first attorney general, Ebenezer R. Hoar, the administratation was not especially aggressive in prosecuting white Southerners who terrorized their black neighbors, but Hoar's successor, ], was more zealous.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=368–369}} Alarmed by this rise in terror by the ] and other groups, Congress investigated. With Grant's encouragement, they passed the ] in 1870 and 1871.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=368–369}} The Acts made it a federal offense to deprive any person of his civil rights and allowed the president to use the army to enforce the laws.{{sfn|Smith|pp=544–545}} In May 1871, Grant ordered federal troops to assist ] in arresting Klansmen.{{sfn|Smith|p=547}} That October, on Akerman's recommendation, Grant suspended '']'' in part of South Carolina and sent federal troops to enforce the law there.{{sfn|Smith|p=547}} The Klan's power collapsed, and by 1872, the elections in the South saw African Americans voting in record numbers.{{sfn|Smith|p=547}}


In October 1871, under the ], using federal marshals, Grant prosecuted hundreds of ] Mormon polygamists.{{sfnm|''The New York Times''|1871|Ertman|2010|3p=301|Kahan|2018|4pp=131–132}} Grant called polygamy a "crime against decency and morality".{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=132}} In 1874, Grant signed into law the ], which made ] subject to trial in District Courts and limited Mormons on juries.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=132}}
That same year, Grant signed the ], which restored political rights to former Confederates. Growing scandals in Washington, some involving members of Grant's administration, took more of the public's attention than the plight of the freedmen. After the collapse of the Klan in 1872, conservative whites formed armed groups (such as the ] in South Carolina and the ]). Unlike the KKK they were not secret. They used violence and intimidation against African Americans in order to take control from the state governments away from the Republicans.{{sfn|Rable|pp=144–86}} Grant replaced Akerman with ], who was soon embroiled in his own scandal.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=391–392}} By 1873, the ] and ensuing depression contributed to public fatigue and the North grew less concerned with reconstructing the South.{{sfn|Smith|pp=552–553}} Grant began to favor more limited use of troops, lest they create the impression that he was acting as a military dictator; he was also concerned that increased military pressure in the South might cause white supremacists in the North to bolt from the Republican Party.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=420–22}} By 1875, Democratic "]" politicians retook control of all but three Southern states. As violence against black Southerners escalated once more, ] (Grant's fourth attorney general) told Governor ] of Mississippi that the people were "tired of the autumnal outbreaks in the South," and declined to intervene.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=420–22}} Grant signed the ], which expanded federal law enforcement by prohibiting discrimination on account of race in ], ]ation, and prohibited exclusion from ].{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=418–19}} The law was rarely enforced, and did not stop the rise of white supremacist forces in the South.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=418–19}} In the ], the remaining three Republican governments in the South fell to Redeemers and the ensuing ] marked the end of Reconstruction. The nation was at peace, but Reconstruction was finished.{{sfn|Badeau 1887|p=256}}


Beginning in March 1873, under the ], Grant prosecuted ], in addition to ]. To administer the prosecutions, Grant put in charge a vigorous anti-vice activist and reformer ].{{sfn|Carpenter|2001|pp=84–85}} Comstock headed a federal commission and was empowered to destroy obscene material and hand out arrest warrants to offenders.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=132}}
===Indian policy===
], appointed by Grant, was the first Native American to serve as ].]]


===Reconstruction===
Grant's attempts to provide justice to ] marked a radical reversal of what had long been the government's policy of ]. He appointed ], a ] Indian and member of Grant's wartime staff, as ]. "My efforts in the future will be directed," Grant told Congress, "by a humane course, to bring the aborigines of the country under the benign influences of education and civilization ... Wars of extermination... are demoralizing and wicked." Grant's "Peace Policy" (also called the "Quaker Policy") aimed to replace entrepreneurs serving as Indian agents with missionaries.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1pp=308–309|Brands 2012a||2p=502}} In 1869, Grant signed an appropriations bill that established a Board of Indian Commissioners to oversee spending and reduce corruption in the Bureau of Indian Affairs.{{sfn|Smith|p=535}} Two years later, in 1871, Grant signed a bill that ending the Indian treaty system; the law now treated individual Native Americans as wards of the federal government, rather than dealing with the tribes as sovereign entities.{{sfn|Waltmann|p=327}} Grant wished the tribes to be protected on reservations and educated in European-style farming and culture, abandoning their hunter-gatherer way of life.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1pp=308–309|Brands 2012a||2p=502}} While unpopular today, the Peace Policy was considered liberal-minded in its day, and would see its fulfillment years later in the ] of 1887. The Policy showed some success in reducing conflict with fewer battles between Indians and whites on the western frontier, but the increased slaughter of the buffalo, encouraged by Grant's subordinates, caused renewed conflict with the Plains Indians in a few years.{{sfnm|Smith||1pp=536–38|Brands 2012a||2pp=501–503}} The ] and other Plains tribes accepted the reservation system, but encroachments by whites in search of ] led to ] by the end of Grant's second term.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=501}} The war ended the growing understanding that had developed between Grant and Sioux Chief ].{{sfnm|Brands 2012a||1pp=501–503|McFeely 1981||2pp=436–437}}
{{main|Reconstruction era}}
], appointed Attorney General by Grant, who vigorously prosecuted the ]]]


Grant was considered an effective civil rights president, concerned about the plight of ].{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=61}} On March 18, 1869, Grant signed into law equal rights for black people, to serve on juries and hold office, in Washington D.C., and in 1870 he signed the Naturalization Act that gave foreign black people citizenship.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=61}} During his first term, ] took precedence. Republicans controlled most Southern states, propped up by Republican-controlled Congress, northern money, and southern military occupation.{{sfnm|Scher|2015|1p=83|Simon|2002|2p=247}} Grant advocated the ratification of the ] that said states could not disenfranchise African Americans.{{sfn|Simon|2002}} Within a year, the three remaining states—Mississippi, Virginia, and Texas—adopted the new amendment—and were admitted to Congress.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=435,465|Chernow|2017|2pp=686–87|Simon|2002|3p=247}} Grant put military pressure on Georgia to reinstate its black legislators and adopt the amendment.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=465}} Georgia complied, and on February 24, 1871, its senators were seated in Congress, with all former Confederate states represented, the Union was completely restored under Grant.{{efn|Southern Reconstructed states were controlled locally by Republican ], ] and former slaves. By 1877, the conservative Democrats had full control of the region and Reconstruction was dead.{{sfn|Simon|2002|pp=247–48}}}}{{sfn|Simon|2002|p=246}} Under Grant, for the first time in history, Black-American men served in the United States Congress, all from the Southern states.<ref> Access Date November 10, 2021</ref>
Under Major Generals ] and ], Grant's policy had greater success in the Southwest. Howard, the former head of the Freedman's Bureau, negotiated peace with the ] in 1872, convincing their leader, ], to move the tribe to a new reservation, ending ] started the year before.{{sfn|Smith|p=532}} In Oregon, relations were less peaceful, however, as ] erupted in April 1873. The ] refused to move to a reservation and killed the local army commander, Major General ].{{sfn|Smith|p=535}} Although Grant was upset over Canby's death, he ordered restraint from seeking revenge or exterminating the tribe, as Sherman wished.{{sfn|Smith|p=535}} Four Modoc warriors were captured, tried for Canby's murder, sentenced to death, and hanged in October 1873. The remainder of the tribe was sent to ].{{sfn|Smith|p=535}}


In 1870, to enforce Reconstruction, Congress and Grant created the ] that allowed the Attorney General and the new Solicitor General to prosecute the Klan.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=543–45|Brands|2012a|2p=474}} Congress and Grant passed three Enforcement Acts, designed to protect black people and Reconstruction governments.{{sfnm|Kahan|2018|1pp=64–65|Calhoun|2017|2pp=317–319}} Using the Enforcement Acts, Grant crushed the Klan.{{sfn|Foner|2019|pp=119–21}} By October, Grant suspended ''habeas corpus'' in part of South Carolina and sent federal troops to help marshals, who initiated prosecutions.{{sfn|Simon|2002|p=248}} Grant's Attorney General, ], who replaced Hoar, was zealous to destroy the Klan.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=66}} Akerman and South Carolina's U.S. marshal arrested over 470 Klan members, while hundreds of Klansmen, fled the state.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=547|Calhoun|2017|2p=324}} By 1872, the Klan's power had collapsed, and African Americans voted in record numbers in the South.{{efn|To placate the South in 1870, Grant signed the ], which restored political rights to former Confederates.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|pp=67–68}}}}{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=547–48}} Attorney General ], Akerman's replacement, suspended prosecutions of the Klan in 1873, but prior to the election of 1874, changed course and prosecuted the Klan.{{efn|Additionally, Grant's ], ] used his patronage powers to integrate the postal system and appointed a record number of African-American men and women as postal workers across the nation, while also expanding many of the mail routes.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Osborne|first1=John M.|last2=Bombaro|first2=Christine|title=Forgotten Abolitionist: John A. J. Creswell of Maryland|url=http://scholar.dickinson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1387&context=faculty_publications|type=PDF|publisher=Dickinson College|year=2015|access-date=January 21, 2017|archive-date=January 18, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170118051311/http://scholar.dickinson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1387&context=faculty_publications|url-status=dead}}</ref>{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=629}} Grant appointed Republican abolitionist and champion of black education ] as U.S. Circuit Court judge.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=628}}}}{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=122}}
During the Great Sioux War, Grant came into conflict with Col. ] after he testified in 1876 about corruption in the War Department under Secretary ] (see below).{{sfn|Donovan|pp=110–111}} Grant had Custer arrested for breach of military protocol in Chicago and barred him from leading an upcoming campaign against the Sioux.{{sfn|Donovan|p=112}} Grant finally relented and let Custer fight under Brig. Gen. ].{{sfn|Donovan|p=115}} Custer was killed at the subsequent ], a defeat for the federal army.{{sfn|Donovan|pp=308, 310}} Two months later, Grant castigated Custer in the press, saying "I regard Custer's massacre as a sacrifice of troops, brought on by Custer himself, that was wholly unnecessary – wholly unnecessary."{{sfn|Donovan|pp=322–323}} As the nation was shocked by the death of Custer, the Peace Policy yielded to militarism; Congress appropriated funds for 2,500 more troops, two more forts were constructed, the army took over the Indian agencies, while Indians were barred from purchasing rifles and ammunition.{{sfn|Donovan|pp=321, 327}}

During Grant's second term, the North retreated from Reconstruction, while southern conservatives called "]" formed armed groups, the ] and the ], who openly used violence, intimidation, voter fraud, and racist appeals to overturn Republican rule.{{sfnm|Richter|2012|1pp=72, 527–528, 532|Kahan|2018|2pp=121–122}} Northern apathy toward black people, the depressed economy and Grant's scandals made it politically difficult for the administration to maintain support for Reconstruction. Power shifted when the House was taken over by Democrats in the 1874 election.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=552–53|Kahan|2018|2pp=121–22}} Grant ended the ], bringing Reconstruction in Arkansas to a peaceful conclusion. He sent troops to New Orleans in the wake of the ] and disputes over the election of Governor ].{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=538–41|Foner|2014|2p=528}}{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=553}}

By 1875, Redeemer Democrats had taken control of all but three Southern states. As violence against black Southerners escalated, Grant's Attorney General ] told Republican Governor ] of Mississippi that the people were "tired of the autumnal outbreaks in the South", and declined to intervene directly.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=420–22}} Grant later regretted not issuing a proclamation to help Ames, having been told Republicans in Ohio would bolt the party if he did.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=816–17}} Grant told Congress in January 1875 he could not "see with indifference Union men or Republicans ostracized, persecuted, and murdered."{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=552}} Congress refused to strengthen the laws against violence but instead passed the sweeping ] to guarantee black people access to public facilities.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=418–19}} However, there was little enforcement and the Supreme Court ruled the law unconstitutional in 1883.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=418–19|Franklin|1974|2p=235}} In 1876, Grant dispatched troops to South Carolina to keep Republican Governor ] in office.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=570}} After Grant left office, the ] meant Republicans obtained the White House for ] in return for ending enforcement of racial equality for black people and removing federal troops from the South,{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=603–04|Sproat|1974|2pp=163–65|Calhoun|2017|3pp=561–62}} marking the end of Reconstruction.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=853–54|Smith|2001|2pp=603–04|Sproat|1974|3pp=163–65}}

===Financial affairs===

Soon after taking office, Grant took conservative steps to return the economy to pre-war monetary standards.{{sfn|Simon|2002|p=249}} During the War, Congress had authorized the ] to issue banknotes that, unlike the rest of the currency, were not backed by gold or silver. These "]" were necessary to pay the war debts, but caused inflation and forced ] out of circulation.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=279}} On March 18, 1869, Grant signed the ], which guaranteed bondholders would be repaid in "coin or its equivalent". The act committed the government to the full return of the ] within ten years.{{sfnm|1a1=White|1y=2016|1pp=476–78|2a1=Simon|2y=2002|2p=248|3a1=Burdekin|3a2=Siklos|3y=2013|3pp=24–25}} This followed a policy of "hard currency, economy and gradual reduction of the national debt." Grant's own ideas about the economy were simple, and he relied on the advice of businessmen.{{sfn|Simon|2002|p=249}}

====Gold corner conspiracy====
{{further|Black Friday (1869)}}
], showing the collapse of the price of gold]]

In April 1869, railroad tycoons ] and ] conspired to corner the gold market in New York.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=248|Chernow|2017|2p=672|Calhoun|2017|3p=125|Kahan|2018|4p=54}} They controlled the Erie Railroad, and a high gold price would allow foreign agriculture buyers to purchase exported crops, shipped east over the Erie's routes.{{sfnm|Calhoun|2017|1pp=125–28|Kahan|2018|2p=54}} Boutwell's policy of selling gold from the Treasury biweekly, however, kept gold artificially low.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=128}} Unable to corrupt Boutwell, the schemers built a relationship with Grant's brother-in-law, ], and gained access to Grant.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=437–443|McFeely|1974|2p=134|Chernow|2017|3p=673|Calhoun|2017|4pp=128–129|Kahan|2018|5p=55}} Gould bribed Assistant Treasurer ] to gain inside information into the Treasury.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=136, 323–324|Chernow|2017|2p=674|Kahan|2018|3pp=55–56}}

In July, Grant reduced the sale of Treasury gold to $2,000,000 per month.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=130}} Fisk told Grant his gold selling policy would destroy the nation.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=131}} By September, Grant, who was naive regarding finance, was convinced a low gold price would help farmers, and the sale of gold for September was not decreased.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=437–43|Simon|2002|2p=248|Calhoun|2017|3p=130}} On September 23, when the gold price reached {{frac|143|1|8}}, Boutwell rushed to the White House and talked with Grant.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=140–141}} On September 24, known as ], Grant ordered Boutwell to sell, whereupon Boutwell wired Butterfield to sell $4,000,000 in gold.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=141}} The ] at Gould's Gold Room collapsed, the price plummeted from 160 to {{frac|133|1|3}}, a ] panic ensued, Gould and Fisk fled, and economic damages lasted months.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=445, 636|Chernow|2017|2pp=677–88|Calhoun|2017|3p=141}} By January 1870, the economy resumed its post-war recovery.{{efn|An 1870 Congressional investigation chaired by ] cleared Grant of profiteering, but excoriated Gould and Fisk for their manipulation of the gold market and Corbin for exploiting his personal connection to Grant.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=445–46|Simon|2002|2p=248}}}}{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=328|Smith|2001|2p=490}}


===Foreign affairs=== ===Foreign affairs===
Grant had limited foreign policy experience, so relied heavily on his talented Secretary of State ]. Grant and Fish had cordial friendship. Besides Grant, the main players in foreign affairs were Fish and the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ]. Sumner, who hated Grant, led the opposition to Grant's plan to annex Santo Domingo, despite fully supporting annexation of Alaska.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=310–311, 380–381}}
]]]

Even before Grant became president, an annexationist faction in American politics desired control over the Caribbean islands. ], Secretary of State under Lincoln and Johnson, having bought ] from the Russians and attempted to buy the ] from the Danes, began negotiations to ].{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=336–338}} These negotiations continued under Grant, led by ], a confidant who had served on Grant's staff during the Civil War.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=336–338}} Grant was initially skeptical, but the urging of the Admiral Porter, who wanted a naval base at ], and Joseph W. Fabens, a New England businessman employed by the Dominican government, Grant examined the matter and became convinced of its wisdom.{{sfn|Smith|pp=500–502}} Grant sent Babcock to consult with ], the pro-annexation Dominican president, to see if the proposal was practical; Babcock returned with a draft treaty of annexation in December 1869.{{sfn|Smith|pp=500–502}} Grant believed in peaceful expansion of the nation's borders, and thought the majority-black island would allow new economic opportunities for freedmen. The acquisition, according to Grant, would ease race relations in the South, clear slavery from ] and ], and would increase American naval power in the Caribbean.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=455–456}} Secretary of State ] dismissed the idea, seeing the island as politically unstable and troublesome.{{sfn|Smith|pp=500–502}} In the Senate, ] opposed annexation because it would reduce the number of autonomous nations run by Africans in the western hemisphere. Other senators objected for the opposite reason—they did not wish to add more blacks to the American population.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=339–341}} Grant personally lobbied Senators to pass the treaty, going so far as to visit Sumner at his home.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=339–341}} Fish added to the effort out of loyalty to the administration, but to no avail; the Senate refused to pass the treaty. Sumner's role in leading the opposition led to unending political enmity between him and Grant{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=349–352}}
Grant had an expansionist impulse to protect American interests abroad and was a strong advocate of the ].{{sfn|Kahan|2018|pp=75–76}} For instance, when ] became ] in 1872, Grant stressed the importance of maintaining good relations between Bolivia and the US.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Grant |first=Ulysses Simpson |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iDmqzAid0VUC |title=The Papers of Ulysses S. Grant: 1873 |date=2000 |publisher=SIU Press |isbn=978-0-8093-2277-0 |pages=43 |language=en}}</ref> He had an idealist side to his foreign policy. For instance, Grant appointed a Jewish lawyer, ], U.S. ] in ], in response to the ] persecution of ]. Grant said that respect "for human rights is the first duty for those set as rulers" over the nations.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=76}}

] and Grant successfully settled the ] by treaty and arbitration.]]

====Treaty of Washington (1871)====
{{Main|Treaty of Washington (1871)}}
The most pressing diplomatic problem in 1869 was the settlement of the '']'', depredations caused to Union merchant ships by the Confederate warship {{ship|CSS|Alabama}}, built in a British shipyard in violation of neutrality rules.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=249|Smith|2001|2p=491|Kahan|2018|3p=78}} Fish played the central role in formulating and implementing the ] and the Geneva arbitration (1872).<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Libby | first1 = Justin | year = 1994 | title = Hamilton Fish and the Origins of Anglo-American Solidarity | journal = Mid-America | volume = 76 | issue = 3| pages = 205–226 }}</ref> Senator ] led the demand for reparations, with talk of British Columbia as payment.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=352–354}} Sumner, among other politicians, argued that British complicity in arms delivery to the Confederacy via ] prolonged the war.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mgyxstzuOc0C&pg=PA37|title=American Opinions on the "Alabama," and other political questions|author=]|pages=37–39|date=1870}}</ref> Fish and Treasurer George Boutwell convinced Grant that peaceful relations with Britain were essential, and the two nations agreed to negotiate.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=508–511}}

To avoid jeopardizing negotiations, Grant refrained from recognizing Cuban rebels who were fighting for independence from Spain, which would have been inconsistent with American objections to the British granting belligerent status to Confederates.{{efn|Urged by his Secretary of War Rawlins, Grant initially supported recognition of Cuban belligerency, but Rawlins's death on September 6, 1869, removed any cabinet support for military intervention.{{sfn|Simon|2002|p=249}}}}{{sfn|Simon|2002|p=249}} A commission in Washington produced a treaty whereby an international tribunal would settle the damage amounts; the British admitted regret, but not fault.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=512–15|Simon|2002|2p=249}} The Senate, including Grant critics Sumner and ], approved the Treaty of Washington, which settled disputes over fishing rights and maritime boundaries.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|2pp=512–15|Simon|2002|1p=249|Calhoun|2017|3p=344}} The ''Alabama'' Claims settlement was Grant's most successful foreign policy achievement, securing peace with Great Britain.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=7}} The settlement ($15,500,000) of the ''Alabama'' claims resolved troubled Anglo-American issues and turned Britain into America's strongest ally.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Wallace |first1=W. Stewart |title=Treaty of Washington, 1871 |url=http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/quebechistory/encyclopedia/TreatyofWashington-CanadianHistory.htm|publisher=]}}</ref>

====Korean expedition (1871)====
{{Main|United States expedition to Korea}}
In 1871, a U.S. expedition was sent to ] to open up trade with a country which had a policy that excluded trading with foreign powers, and to learn the fate of U.S. merchant ship ], which had disappeared up the ] in 1866.<ref name=Korea1871>{{Cite web|last=Roblin|first=Sebastien|date=January 1, 2018|title=In 1871, America 'Invaded' Korea. Here's What Happened.|url=https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/1871-america-invaded-korea-heres-what-happened-24113|access-date=April 14, 2021|website=The National Interest|language=en|archive-date=November 9, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201109030935/https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/1871-america-invaded-korea-heres-what-happened-24113|url-status=live}}</ref> Grant dispatched a land and naval force consisting of five warships and over 1,200 men, under Admiral ], to support a diplomatic delegation, led by US ambassador to China, ], sent to negotiate trade and political relations.<ref name=Korea1871/>

On June 1, the American ships entered the Ganghwa Straits on the ] and, as foreign ships were barred from entering the river, onshore Korean garrisons fired upon the ships, but little damage was done. When Rodgers demanded an apology and to begin treaty negotiations, the Korean government refused.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=139}} On June 10, Rodgers destroyed several Korean forts, culminating in the ], at which 250 Koreans were killed with a loss of 3 Americans.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=139}} The expedition failed to open up trade and merely strengthened Korea's ].<ref>{{cite web|last=Lindsay|first=James M.|title=TWE Remembers: The Korean Expedition of 1871 and the Battle of Ganghwa (Shinmiyangyo)|date=June 10, 2013|access-date=March 28, 2021|url=https://www.cfr.org/blog/twe-remembers-korean-expedition-1871-and-battle-ganghwa-shinmiyangyo|website=Council on Foreign Relations}}</ref>

==== Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic) ====
{{Main|Proposed annexation of Santo Domingo}}
]
In 1869, Grant initiated his plan to annex the ], then called Santo Domingo.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=555, 660–61|Kahan|2018|2pp=75–76|Calhoun|2017|3p=199}} Grant believed acquisition would increase the United States' natural resources, and strengthen U.S. naval protection to enforce the ], safeguard against British obstruction of U.S. shipping and protect a future oceanic canal, stop slavery in Cuba and Brazil, while black people in the United States would have a safe haven from "the crime of Klu Kluxism".{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=661–62|Kahan|2018|2pp=75–76|Calhoun|2017|3pp=199–200, 206|Brands|2012a|4pp=454–55}}

Joseph W. Fabens, an American speculator who represented ], the president of the Dominican Republic, met with Secretary Fish and proposed annexation.{{sfnm|Kahan|2018|1pp=90–91|Calhoun|2017|2p=204}} On July 17, Grant sent a military aide ] to evaluate the islands' resources, local conditions, and Báez's terms for annexation, but gave him no diplomatic authority.{{sfnm|Calhoun|2017|1pp=207, 210–11|Kahan|2018|2p=91}} When Babcock returned to Washington with unauthorized annexation treaties, Grant pressured his cabinet to accept them.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=500–02|Chernow|2017|2pp=663–664|Calhoun|2017|3p=220}} Grant ordered Fish to draw up formal treaties, sent to Báez by Babcock's return to the island nation. The Dominican Republic would be annexed for $1.5&nbsp;million and Samaná Bay would be lease-purchased for $2&nbsp;million. Generals ] and ] accompanied Babcock.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=224}} On November 29, President Báez signed the treaties. On December 21, the treaties were placed before Grant and his cabinet.{{sfnm|Kahan|2018|1p=91|Calhoun|2017|2pp=223, 226}}

Grant's plan, however, was obstructed by Senator ].{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=665}} On December 31, Grant met with Sumner at Sumner's home to gain his support for annexation. Grant left confident that Sumner approved, but what Sumner actually said was disputed by various witnesses. Without appealing to the American public, Grant submitted the treaties on January 10, 1870, to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Sumner, for ratification, but Sumner shelved the bills.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=660–665|Calhoun|2017|2pp=226–234, 254}} Prompted by Grant to stop stalling the treaties, Sumner's committee took action but rejected the bills by a 5-to-2 vote. Sumner opposed annexation and reportedly said the Dominicans were "a turbulent, treacherous race" in a closed session of the Senate.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=237–238}} Sumner sent the treaties for a full Senate vote, while Grant personally lobbied other senators. Despite Grant's efforts, the Senate defeated the treaties.{{sfnm|White|2016|1pp=509–12|Pletcher|1998|2p=167|Simon|2002|pp=249–50|McFeely|1981|4pp=339–40}}

Grant was outraged, and on July 1, 1870, he sacked his appointed Minister to Great Britain, ], Sumner's friend and ally.{{sfnm|Calhoun|2017|1pp=254, 258|Kahan|2018|2p=94}} In January 1871, Grant signed a joint resolution to send a commission to investigate annexation.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1p=461|Kahan|2018|2pp=94–95}} He chose three neutral parties, with ] to be secretary of the commission, that gave Grant the moral high ground from Sumner.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=715–716}} Although the commission approved its findings, the Senate remained opposed, forcing Grant to abandon further efforts.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1p=461|Smith|2001|2pp=505–506}} Seeking retribution, in March 1871, Grant maneuvered to have Sumner deposed from his powerful Senate chairmanship.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=250|McFeely|1981|2pp=349–352|Kahan|2018|3p=95}} The stinging controversy over Santo Domingo overshadowed Grant's foreign diplomacy.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=7}} Critics complained of Grant's reliance on military personnel to implement his policies.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=224}}

====Cuba and Virginius Affair====
{{Main|Virginius Affair}}
American policy under Grant was to remain neutral during the ] (1868–78) in Cuba against Spanish rule. On the recommendation of Fish and Sumner, Grant refused to recognize the rebels, in effect endorsing Spanish colonial rule, while calling for the abolition of slavery in Cuba.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Priest | first1 = Andrew | year = 2014 | title = Thinking about Empire: The administration of Ulysses S. Grant, Spanish colonialism and the ten years' war in Cuba | url = http://repository.essex.ac.uk/8256/2/AMSPriestrewrite.pdf | journal = Journal of American Studies | volume = 48 | issue = 2| pages = 541–558 | doi = 10.1017/s0021875813001400 | s2cid = 145139039 | issn=0021-8758}}</ref>{{sfn|Hamilton Fish (1808–1893)}} This was done to protect American commerce and to keep peace with Spain.{{sfn|Hamilton Fish (1808–1893)}}

This fragile policy was broken in October 1873, when a Spanish cruiser captured a merchant ship, ], flying the U.S. flag, carrying supplies and men to aid the insurrection. Treating them as pirates, Spanish authorities executed 53 prisoners without trial, including eight Americans. American Captain Joseph Frye and his crew were executed and their bodies mutilated. Enraged Americans called for war with Spain. Grant ordered U.S. Navy Squadron warships to converge on Cuba. On November 27, Fish reached a diplomatic resolution in which Spain's president, ], expressed his regret, surrendered the ''Virginius'' and the surviving captives. Spain paid $80,000 to the families of the executed Americans.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=426–31}}{{sfnm|Nevins|1936|1pp=667–94}}

====Free trade with Hawaii====
{{Main|Reciprocity Treaty of 1875}}
] meets President Grant at the White House on his ], 1874.]]

In the face of strong opposition from Democrats, Grant and Fish secured a free trade treaty in 1875 with ], incorporating its sugar industry into the U.S. economic sphere.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=539–40}} To secure the agreement, King ] made a 91-day ], the first reigning monarch to set foot in the United States.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Hendrix |first1=Steve |title='Brilliant beyond all precedent': The first White House state dinner for the king of Hawaii |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/04/24/brilliant-beyond-all-precedent-the-first-white-house-state-dinner-for-the-king-of-hawaii/ |newspaper=] |date=April 25, 2018}}</ref> Despite opposition from Southern Democrats, who wanted to protect American rice and sugar producers, and Democrats, who believed the treaty to be an island annexation attempt and referred to the Hawaiians as an "inferior" race, a bill implementing the treaty passed Congress.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=539–540}}

The treaty gave free access to the U.S. market for sugar and other products grown in Hawaii from September 1876. The U.S. gained lands in the area known as Pu{{okina}}u Loa for what would become known as the ] naval base. The treaty led to large investment by Americans in ].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Farr |first1=Kate |title=Reciprocity Treaty of 1875 |url=https://www.dartmouth.edu/~hist32/History/S26%20-%20Reciprocity%20Treaty%20of%201875.htm |publisher=] |access-date=June 29, 2023 |archive-date=October 21, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231021043424/https://www.dartmouth.edu/~hist32/History/S26%20-%20Reciprocity%20Treaty%20of%201875.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref>

===Federal Indian policy===
{{main|Native American policy of the Ulysses S. Grant administration}}
{{further|Black Hills Land Claim|Black Hills Gold Rush|Great Sioux War}}

], appointed by President Grant as the first ] ('']'') Commissioner of ]]]

When Grant took office in 1869, the nation's more than 250,000 ] were governed by 370 treaties.{{sfn|White|2016|p=487}} Grant's faith influenced his "peace" policy, believing that the "Creator" did not place races of men on earth for the "stronger" to destroy the "weaker".{{sfn|White|2016|p=491}} Grant was mostly an assimilationist, wanting Native Americans to adopt European customs, practices, and language, and accept democratic government, leading to eventual citizenship.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=830–31}}<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite web |title=President Ulysses S. Grant and Federal Indian Policy |url=https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/president-ulysses-s-grant-and-federal-indian-policy.htm |publisher=Ulysses S. Grant National Historic Site |website=] |access-date=April 14, 2022 }}</ref> At Grant's 1869 Inauguration, Grant said "I will favor any course towards them which tends to their civilization, Christianization and ultimate citizenship."<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Grant appointed ], an assimilated ] and member of his wartime staff, as the ], the first Native American to serve in this position, surprising many.{{sfnm|White|2016|1pp=490–491|Simon|2002|2p=250|Smith|2001|3pp=472–473}}<ref name="ReferenceA"/>

In April 1869, Grant signed legislation establishing an unpaid ] to reduce corruption and oversee the implementation of his "Peace" policy,{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=250|Smith|2001|2p=535|Simon|2002|3p=250}} aimed to replace entrepreneurs serving as Native American agents with missionaries and to protect Native Americans on reservations and educate them in farming.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=308–309|Brands|2012a|2p=502}}

In 1870, a setback in Grant's policy occurred over the ], causing public outrage.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=270}} In 1871, Grant ended the sovereign tribal treaty system; by law individual Native Americans were deemed ] of the federal government.{{sfn|Waltmann|1971|p=327}} Grant's policy was undermined by Parker's resignation in 1871, denominational infighting among religious agents, and entrenched economic interests.{{sfn|Simon|2002|p=250}} Nonetheless, Indian wars declined overall during Grant's first term, and on October 1, 1872, Major General ] negotiated peace with the ] leader ].{{sfnm|Coffey|2011|p=183|Kahan|2018|2pp=71–72}} On December 28, 1872, another setback took place when General ] and the 5th Cavalry massacred about 75 Yavapai Apache Indians at ].<ref>{{cite web |first=Kathy |last=Block |editor-last=Du Shane |editor-first=Neal |title=Skeleton Cave Massacre Site |url=https://www.apcrp.org/SKELETON_CAVE/Skeleton_Cave_Massacre_040312.htm |website=American Pioneer & Cemetery Research Project}}</ref>

On April 11, 1873, Major General ] was killed in North California by ] leader ].{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=532–535|Coffey|2011|p=423}} Grant ordered restraint. The army captured Kintpuash and his followers, who were convicted of Canby's murder and hanged on October 3, while the remaining Modoc were relocated to the ].{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=532–535|Coffey|2011|p=423}} The beginning of the Indian Wars has been dated to this event.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|p=127}}

In 1874, the army defeated the ] at the ], forcing them to settle at the ] reservation in 1875.{{sfn|Coffey|2011|pp=604–605}} Grant ] a bill in 1874 protecting bison and instead supported Interior Secretary ], who correctly believed killing bison would force ] to abandon their nomadic lifestyle.{{sfnm|Taylor|2011|1pp=3187–3188|Pritchard|1999|2p=5}} In April 1875, another setback occurred: the U.S. Army massacred 27 Cheyenne Indians in Kansas.<ref>{{cite web |title=Timeline of U.S. Indian Massacres |url=https://www.aaanativearts.com/timeline-of-us-indian-massacres |website=AAANativeArts.com |date=February 29, 2016}}</ref>

With the lure of gold discovered in the ] and the westward force of ], white settlers trespassed on ]. ] reluctantly entered negotiations on May 26, 1875, but other Sioux chiefs readied for war.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=830–831|Brands|2012a|2p=564}} Grant told the Sioux leaders to make "arrangements to allow white persons to go into the Black Hills" and that their children would attend schools, speak English, and prepare "for the life of white men."{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=830–31}}

], 1876]]

On November 3, 1875, under advice from Sheridan, Grant agreed not to enforce excluding miners from the Black Hills, forcing Native Americans onto the Sioux reservation.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1p=832|Calhoun|2017|2p=546}} Sheridan told Grant that the U.S. Army was undermanned and the territory involved was vast, requiring many soldiers.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=538}}

During the ] that started after ] refused to relocate to agency land, warriors led by ] massacred ] and his men at the ]. Angry white settlers demanded retribution. Grant castigated Custer in the press, saying "I regard Custer's massacre as a sacrifice of troops, brought on by Custer himself, that was wholly unnecessary."{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=565–566|Donovan|2008|2pp=115, 322–323}} In September and October 1876, Grant persuaded the tribes to relinquish the Black Hills. Congress ratified the agreement three days before Grant left office in 1877.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=549}}

In spite of Grant's peace efforts, over 200 battles were fought with Native Americans during his presidency. Grant's peace policy survived Custer's death, even after Grant left office in 1877; Indian policy remained under the Interior Department rather than the War Department.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=316}} The policy was considered humanitarian for its time but later criticized for disregarding tribal cultures.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=541}}

===Election of 1872 and second term===
{{main|1872 United States presidential election}}
] on Grant's opponents in the reelection campaign]]

The ]&mdash;reformers, men who supported low tariffs, and those who opposed Grant's prosecution of the Klan&mdash;broke from Grant and the Republican Party.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=250|Chernow|2017|2pp=734–735|Kahan|2018|3pp=105–106|Brands|2012a|4pp=488–489}} The Liberals disliked Grant's alliance with Senators ] and ], considered to be spoilsmen politicians.{{sfn|Kahan|2018|pp=104–106}}

In 1872, the Liberals nominated ], a ''New York Tribune'' editor and enemy of Grant, for president, and Missouri governor ], for vice president.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1pp=250–51|Brands|2012a|2p=495|Chernow|2017|3pp=740–741}} The Liberals denounced ], corruption, and inefficiency, and demanded withdrawal of federal troops from the South, literacy tests for black voters, and amnesty for Confederates.{{sfnm|Wang|1997|1pp=103–104|Simon|2002|2p=250|Chernow|2017|3pp=735, 740}} The Democrats adopted the Greeley-Brown ticket and the Liberals party platform.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=495}} Greeley pushed the themes that the Grant administration was failed and corrupt.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=361, 375}}

The Republicans nominated Grant for reelection, with Senator ] of Massachusetts as the vice presidential nominee.{{efn|Details revealed of the 1867 ], implicating both Colfax and Wilson, stung the Grant administration, but Grant was not connected to the corruption.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=251|Chernow|2017|2p=753|Kahan|2018|3p=114}}}}{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=743}} The Republicans shrewdly borrowed from the Liberal platform, including "extended amnesty, lowered tariffs, and embraced civil service reform."{{sfn|White|2016|p=532}} Grant lowered customs duties, gave amnesty to Confederates, and implemented a civil service merit system, neutralizing the opposition.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=372–373, 387}} To placate the burgeoning ] movement, the Republican platform said women's rights would be treated with "respectful consideration."{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=749–750}} Concerning Southern policy, Greeley advocated that local government control be given to white people, while Grant advocated federal protection of black people.{{sfnm|Foner|2014|p=509|Calhoun|2017|pp=386–387}} Grant was supported by ], prominent abolitionists, and Indian reformers.{{sfn|White|2016|p=535}}

Grant won reelection easily thanks to federal prosecution of the Klan, a strong economy, debt reduction, and lowered tariffs and taxes.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=384|Simon|2002|2pp=250–251|Chernow|2017|3p=749}} He received 56% of the vote and an Electoral College landslide (286 to 66).<ref>{{cite web|title=Election of 1872|url=https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/elections/1872 |work=The American Presidency Project |publisher=University of California, Santa Barbara}}</ref>{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1pp=250–251|Brands|2012a|2p=499}} Most African Americans in the South voted for Grant, while Democratic opposition remained mostly peaceful.{{sfn|Foner|2014|p=508}} Grant lost in six former slave states that wanted an end to Reconstruction.{{sfn|Goethals|2015|p=98}} He proclaimed the victory as a personal vindication, but felt betrayed by the Liberals.{{sfn|Simon|2002|pp=250–251}}

Grant was sworn in by ] on March 4, 1873. In his second inaugural address, he focused on what he considered the chief issues: freedom and fairness for all Americans and the benefits of citizenship for freed slaves. Grant concluded his address: "My efforts in the future will be directed towards the restoration of good feelings between the different sections of our common community".{{efn|The day after his inauguration, Grant wrote a letter to Colfax expressing his faith and trust in Colfax's integrity and allowed him to publish the letter, but the effort only served to compromise Grant's reputation.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=752–53}}}}{{sfn|White|2016|pp=540–41}} Wilson died in office on November 22, 1875.{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=545|Diller|1996|2p=1545}} With Wilson's loss, Grant relied on Fish's guidance more than ever.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=385}}

===Panic of 1873 and loss of House===
Grant signed the ], effectively ending the legal basis for ].{{sfn|Venable|2011|pp=66–68}} The Coinage Act discontinued the ] and established the ] as the monetary standard; because the gold supply did not increase as quickly as the population, the result was deflation. Silverites, who wanted more money in circulation to raise the prices farmers received, denounced the move as the "Crime of 1873", claiming deflation made debts more burdensome for farmers.{{sfn|Weinstein|1967|pp=307–326}}

]


Economic turmoil renewed during Grant's second term. In September 1873, ], a New York brokerage house, collapsed after it failed to sell all the bonds issued by ]. Other banks and brokerages that owned railroad stocks and bonds were ruined.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=517}}{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=393}} Grant, who knew little about finance, traveled to New York to consult leading businessmen on how to resolve the crisis, which became known as the ].{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=576–579}} Grant believed that, as with the collapse of the Gold Ring in 1869, the panic was merely an economic fluctuation.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=518}} He instructed the Treasury to buy $10&nbsp;million in government bonds, which curbed the panic, but the ], swept the nation.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=576–579}} Eighty-nine of the nation's 364 railroads went bankrupt.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=391|Smith|2001|2pp=375–377}}
], Grant's Secretary of Navy ] authorized the construction of five new naval battleships.]]


In 1874, hoping inflation would stimulate the economy, Congress passed the ] Bill.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=779}} Many farmers and workingmen favored the bill, which would have added $64&nbsp;million in ]s to circulation, but some Eastern bankers opposed it because it would have weakened the dollar.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=395}} Belknap, Williams, and Delano told Grant a veto would hurt Republicans in the November elections. Grant believed the bill would destroy the credit of the nation and vetoed it despite their objections. Grant's veto placed him in the Republican conservative faction and began the party's commitment to a gold-backed dollar.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=580–581}} Grant later pressured Congress for a bill to strengthen the dollar by gradually reducing the greenbacks in circulation. When the Democrats gained a majority in the House after the ], the ] Republican Congress did so before the Democrats took office.{{sfn|White|2016|pp=545, 550}} On January 14, 1875, Grant signed the ], which required reduction of greenbacks allowed to circulate and declared that they would be redeemed for gold beginning on January 1, 1879.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=580–582|Brands|2012a|2p=554}}
Grant and Fish were more successful in their satisfaction of the ], a dispute between Great Britain and the United States. The dispute stemmed from the damage done to American shipping during the Civil War by five ships build for the Confederacy in British shipyards including, most famously, ].{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=334–336}} When the war ended, the United States demanded retribution, which the British refused to pay. Negotiations continued fitfully, a sticking point being the claims of "indirect damages" as opposed to the discussion to the harm directly caused by the five ships.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=352–354}} Again, Sumner was opposed, believing that the United States should seek a $2 billion reward payable in gold or, alternatively, by the cession of Canada.{{sfn|Smith|p=508}} Fish convinced Grant that peaceful relations were Britain were more important than acquisition of more territory, and the two nations agreed to negotiate along those lines.{{sfn|Smith|pp=509–511}} A commission met in Washington produced a treaty whereby an international tribunal would settle the damage amounts; the British admitted regret, rather than fault.{{efn|The international tribunal awarded the United States $15,500,000.}} The Senate approved the ], which also settled disputes over fishing rights and maritime boundaries, by a 50–12 vote in 1871.{{sfn|Smith|pp=512–515}}


===Reforms and scandals===
Grant's attention was drawn to the Caribbean again in 1873, a merchant ship, '']'', carrying war materials and men to aid the Cuban insurrection, was taken captive by a Spanish warship. ''Virginius'' was registered in the United States, but secretly owned by Cuban insurgents. The passengers and crew, including eight United States citizens, were trying to illegally get into Cuba to help overthrow the government. Spanish authorities executed the prisoners, and many Americans called for war with Spain. Fish, with Grant's support, worked to reach a peaceful resolution. Spain's President, ] expressed regret for the tragedy and agreed to determine reparations through arbitration; Spain surrendered the ''Virginius'' and paid a cash indemnity of $80,000 to the families of the executed Americans.{{sfn|Nevins|pp=667–94}} The administration's diplomacy was also at work in the Pacific as, in December 1874, Grant held a state dinner at the White House for the King of Hawaii, ], who was seeking the importation of Hawaiian sugar duty-free to the United States.{{sfn|Kreiser|p=19}} Grant and Fish were able to produce a successful free trade treaty in 1875 with the ], incorporating the Pacific islands' sugar industry into the United States' economy sphere.{{sfn|Kreiser|p=19}}
{{further|Reforms of the Ulysses S. Grant administration|Scandals of the Ulysses S. Grant administration}}


The post-Civil War economy brought on massive industrial wealth and government expansion. Speculation, lifestyle extravagance, and corruption in federal offices were rampant.{{sfnm|Woodward|1957|1p=156|White|2016|2pp=538, 541}} All of Grant's executive departments were investigated by Congress.{{sfnm|McFeely|1974|1pp=133–134|Chernow|2017|2p=825}} Grant by nature was honest, trusting, gullible, and loyal to his friends. His responses to malfeasance were mixed: at times appointing cabinet reformers, others defending culprits.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=587, 92|McFeely|1981|2pp=407–15|White|2016|3pp=538–39|Chernow|2017|4p=672|Kahan|2018|5p=119}}
===Gold standard and the Gold Ring===
]
Soon after taking office, Grant took steps to return the nation's currency to a more secure footing. During the Civil War, Congress had authorized the Treasury to issue banknotes that, unlike the rest of the currency, were not backed by gold or silver. The "]" notes, as they were known, were necessary to pay the unprecedented bills the government racked up in fighting the war, but they also caused inflation and forced gold-backed money out of circulation; Grant was determined to return to pre-war monetary standards.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=279}} Many in Congress agreed with Grant, and they quickly passed the ], which guaranteed that bondholders would be repaid in gold, not greenbacks.{{sfn|Smith|pp=480–481}} Grant charged Treasury Secretary ] rationalizing the treasury Department and improving tax collection. To strengthen the dollar, Boutwell, backed by Grant, sold gold from the Treasury each month and bought back high-interest Treasury bonds issued during the war; this had the effect of reducing the deficit, but deflating the currency.{{sfnm|Smith||1pp=480–481|Ackerman||2pp=90–91}}


] praises Grant for rejecting demands by Pennsylvania politicians to suspend civil service rules.]]
These actions had a large impact on the nation's small gold market, and gold speculators tried to make a profit by anticipating how much gold Boutwell would sell in a given week.{{sfn|Smith|p=482}} ], Grant's brother-in-law, sought to use his connection with the president to gain inside information for himself and his associates, ], a Wall Street trader and railroad magnate, and his partner ] (later called the "Gold Ring."){{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=437–439}} Corbin convinced Grant to appoint ] as assistant Treasurer, and Gould soon made Butterfield his informant.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=323–324}} Meanwhile, Gould and Fisk began to quietly stockpile gold. Gould convince Corbin that a high gold price would make the nation prosperous, and Corbin passed the theory on to Grant.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=437–439}} The conspirators believed they had convinced the president, and continued to stockpile gold, hoping to sell into a rising market.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=440–443}} After consulting with New York businessman ] in early September, Grant stopped the sale of Treasury gold, believing a higher gold price would help Western farmers.{{sfn|Brands|p=441}} However, by mid September, Grant soon became suspicious of Corbin, however, when Corbin tried to drive a wedge between Grant and Boutwell. {{sfn|Smith|pp=486–487}} The gold price continued to rise as the conspirators bought ever more.{{sfn|Smith|pp=486–487}} The rising price began to affect the wider economy and Grant, seeing that the increase was unnatural, told Boutwell to sell gold, thereby reducing its price.{{sfn|Smith|pp=488–489}} He did so the next day, September 22, 1869 ("].") The sale of gold from the Treasury defeated Gould's corner on the market as the gold price plummeted, relieving the growing economic tension.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=445, 636}} Gould and Fisk managed to escape without much harm to themselves.{{sfn|Smith|p=490}} A New York bank collapsed and trading dried up for months, but a general recession did not follow and the economy resumed its post-war recovery.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=328}}


Grant in his first term appointed Secretary of Interior ], who implemented civil service reform, including firing unqualified clerks.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1p=730|Schmiel|2014|2pp=205, 213|Calhoun|2017|3p=293}} On October 3, 1870, Cox resigned after a dispute with Grant over handling of a mining claim.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=730–731|Schmiel|2014|2pp=214–215|Calhoun|2017|3pp=284–286}} Authorized by Congress on March 3, 1871, Grant created and appointed the first ].{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=589–90|Simon|2002|2p=250|Calhoun|2017|3p=372|Kahan|2018|4pp=105—106}} Grant's Commission created rules for competitive exams for appointments, ending mandatory political assessments and classifying positions into grades.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1p=731|Calhoun|2017|2p=372}}{{efn|When Congress failed to make the Commission's reform rules permanent, Grant dissolved the Commission in 1874.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=589}}}}
===Reelection===
{{main|United States presidential election, 1872}}
] on Grant's opponents in the re-election campaign]]
Grant's personal reputation suffered from the continued scandals caused by many corrupt appointees and personal associates. In addition to the Gold Ring, ] added to reformers negative impressions of the administration. The ], in which a railroad company bribed many members of Congress, did not involve Grant, but did ensnare Vice President Colfax and added to the general sense of dishonesty in Washington. To reach out to reformers, Grant encouraged Congress to create the ] in 1871, chaired by reformer ], which had the power to propose reforms. {{sfn|Patrick|p=172}} Grant accepted its reform recommendations that were implemented on January 1, 1872.{{sfn|Simon 2002|p=250}} Congress, however, refused to fund the Civil Service Commission in 1875 or pass legislation to enforce its recommendations.{{sfnm|Smith||1pp=589–590|Patrick||2p=173}} Grant remained quiet on Civil Service reform after the election.{{sfn|Patrick||p=173}} There was further division within the party between the faction most concerned with the plight of the freedmen and that concerned with the growth of industry.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=488–489}} During the war, both factions' interests aligned and in 1868 both had supported Grant. Since then his election, both felt alienated by Grant, especially the faction concerned with advancing the interest of black Americans.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=488–489}}


In November 1871, Grant's appointed New York Collector, ], resigned. Grant replaced him with ], who implemented Boutwell's reforms.{{sfnm|Calhoun|2017|1pp=366–367, 735–737|McFeely|1974|2pp=144–145|Kahan|2018|3p=114}} A Senate committee investigated the New York Customs House in 1872. Previous Grant appointed collectors Murphy and ] charged lucrative fees for warehouse space, without the legal requirement of listing the goods.{{sfn|Martinez (March 15, 2021)}} This led to Grant firing warehouse owner George K. Leet, for pocketing the exorbitant freight fees.{{sfnm|Calhoun|2017|1pp=368–369|McFeely|1974|2pp=144–145|Kahan|2018|3p=114}} Boutwell's reforms included stricter record-keeping and that goods be stored on company docks.{{sfn|Martinez (March 15, 2021)}} Grant ordered prosecutions by Attorney General ] and Secretary of Treasury Boutwell of persons accepting and paying bribes.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=369}}
Many of such men bolted in 1872, calling themselves the ]. Led by ] of Massachusetts and Senator ] of Missouri, they publicly denounced the political patronage system that Sumner called "]" and demanded amnesty for Confederate soldiers. The Liberal Republicans nominated ], another Republican who had come to dislike Grant and his policies.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=494}} The rest of the Republican Party nominated Grant for reelection with ] of Massachusetts replacing Colfax as vice-presidential nominee.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=381}} The Democrats, seeking to combine anti-Grant sentiment, quickly nominated Greeley as well.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=495}} The fusion effort was unsuccessful, and Grant was easily reelected. The Liberal Republicans were unable to deliver many votes, and Greeley was only successful in areas the Democrats would have carried without him.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=384}} Grant won 56% of the poplar vote and an Electoral College landslide of 286 to 66.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=499}}{{efn|Greeley died after election day but before the day the ] voted, so his votes were scattered among four other Democrats.}}


On March 3, 1873, Grant signed into law an ] that increased pay for federal employees, Congress (retroactive), the judiciary, and the president.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=251|Calhoun|2017|2pp=402–409}}{{sfn|Martinez (March 15, 2021)}} Grant's annual salary doubled to $50,000. Critics derided Congress' two-year retroactive $4,000 payment for each Congressman, and the law was partially repealed. Grant kept his much-needed pay raise, while his reputation remained intact.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=251|Smith|2001|2pp=552–553|Calhoun|2017|3pp=369, 404}}{{sfn|Martinez (March 15, 2021)}}
===Panic of 1873 and currency debates===
]
Grant's second term saw renewed economic turmoil. In September 1873, ], a New York brokerage house, failed to fully sell a bond issue by ] railroad, the ], and collapsed as a result.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=517}} The collapse sent ripples through ] and other banks and brokerages that owned railroad stocks and bonds found themselves ruined as well.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=517}} On September 20, the ] suspended for ten days.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=393}} Grant, who knew little about finance, traveled to ] to consult leading businessmen and bankers for advice on how to curb the panic, which became known as the ].{{sfn|Smith|pp=576–79}} Grant believed that, as with the collapse of the Gold Ring in 1869, the panic was merely an economic fluctuation that affected bankers and brokers.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=518}} He responded cautiously, instructing Treasury Secretary ] to purchase $10 million in government bonds, thus injecting cash into the system. These purchases curbed the panic on Wall Street, but a five-year industrial depression, later called the ] nonetheless swept the nation.{{sfn|Smith|pp=576–79}} Eighty-nine of the nation's 364 railroads went bankrupt.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1p=391|Smith||2pp=375–77}}


In 1872, Grant signed into law an act that ended private moiety (''tax collection'') contracts, but an attached rider allowed three more contracts.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=446}} Boutwell's assistant secretary ] hired ] to go after "individuals and cooperations" who allegedly evaded taxes. Sanborn aggressively collected $213,000, while splitting $156,000 to others, including Richardson, and the Republican Party campaign committee.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=578|McFeely|1974|2p=147|Chernow|2017|3p=782|Calhoun|2017|4pp=446–447}}{{sfn|Martinez (March 15, 2021)}} During an 1874 Congressional investigation, Richardson denied involvement, but Sanborn said he met with Richardson over the contracts.{{sfnm|McFeely|1974|1pp=147–48|Chernow|2017|2p=782|White|2016|pp=446–47}} Congress severely condemned Richardson's permissive manner. Grant appointed Richardson judge of the ], and replaced him with reformer ].{{sfnm|McFeely|1974|1pp=147–148|Chernow|2017|2p=782|Calhoun|2017|3pp=446–448}} In June, Grant and Congress abolished the ].{{sfn|McFeely|1974|pp=133–134}}
After the Panic, Congress debated an inflationary policy to stimulate the economy and passed what became known as the Inflation Bill on April 14, 1874. Many farmers and workingmen favored the bill, which would add $64 million in greenbacks to circulation, but some Eastern bankers opposed it because it would weaken the dollar.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=395}} Grant unexpectedly vetoed the bill on the grounds that it would destroy the credit of the nation.{{sfn|Smith|pp=580–581}} Grant's veto placed him securely in the conservative faction of the Republican party, and was the beginning of the party's commitment to a strong gold-backed dollar.{{sfn|Smith|pp=580–581}} Grant later pressured Congress for an bill to further strengthen dollar by gradually reducing the number of greenbacks in circulation. After losing the House to the Democrats in the ], the ] Republican Congress did so. On January 14, 1875, Grant signed the ] into law.{{sfn|Smith|pp=580–581}} The Resumption Act required gradual reduction of the maximum value of greenbacks allowed to circulate and declared the resumption of specie payment on January 1, 1879. At the same time, Grant replaced Richardson, who was involved in the ], with ] of Kentucky, who supported Grant's anti-inflationary hard money policy.{{sfn|Smith|pp=580–581}}


Bristow tightened up the Treasury's investigation force, implemented civil service, and fired hundreds of corrupt appointees.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=556–557|Kohn|2000|2p=417|Nevins|1929|3p=56|McFeely|1974|4p=148|White|2016|5pp=557, 560|Calhoun|2017|6p=494}} Bristow discovered Treasury receipts were low, and launched an investigation that uncovered the notorious ], that involved collusion between distillers and Treasury officials to evade millions in taxes.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=494, 496}}{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=252|Chernow|2017|2p=798}} In mid-April, Bristow informed Grant of the ring. On May 10, Bristow struck hard and broke the ring.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|pp=496–497}} Federal marshals raided 32 installations nationwide, leading to 110 convictions and $3,150,000 in fines.{{sfnm|McFeely|1974|1p=156|Smith|2001|2p=584|Brands|2012a|3pp=556–557|White|2016|4p=754|Calhoun|2017|7p=497}}
=== Gilded Age corruption and reform ===
{{see|Ulysses S. Grant presidential administration scandals|Ulysses S. Grant presidential administration reforms}}
].]]
Grant served as president during the ], a time when the economy was open to speculation and western expansion that fueled corruption in government offices. He faced charges of misconduct in nearly all federal departments, especially in the Treasury and Interior departments, and engaged in constant conflict between corrupt associates and the reformers.{{sfn|McFeely 1974|pp=133–34}} Although personally honest with his own money matters, Grant had difficulty in spotting corruption in others.{{sfn|Woodward|pp=53–108}} He was protective of associates, whose persecutions he saw as unjust.{{sfn|Smith|p=587}} Grant's military discipline produced a loyalty that shielded associates from attack at the expense of his own reputation, unless evidence of personal misconduct was overwhelming.{{sfn|Smith|p=587}} With the exception of Grant's personal secretary, ], who indirectly controlled many cabinet departments and delayed investigations, the scandals were unrelated to each other.{{sfnm|McFeely 1974||1p=133|Woodward||2pp=53–108}}


]''<br /> cartoon on Bristow's Whiskey Ring investigation]]
In Grant's second term the scandals escalated. More corruption in the Treasury Department was made public in the ], in which John D. Sanborn (a friend of Congressman ], the erstwhile Civil War general) was hired as an independent tax collector on a percentage basis (also known as a ''moiety''.){{sfn|Smith|p=578}} Treasury officials were then instructed not to press for payment, so that accounts would become delinquent and Sanborn would get paid more when he "discovered" them.{{sfn|Smith|p=578}} Grant quietly appointed Treasury Secretary ] to the ], and appointed reformer, ], in 1874 as his replacement.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=556–557}} To prevent future unscrupulousness like Sanborn's, Grant signed the Anti-Moiety Act into law in 1874, abolishing the troublesome payment system.{{sfn|McFeely 1974|pp=133–134}}
On becoming Treasury Secretary, the energetic Bristow immediately made a series of needed reforms.{{sfn|Brands 2012a||1pp=556–557|Kohn||2p=417}} Finding that millions of dollars in revenue were missing, Bristow discovered what became known as the Whiskey Ring—tax officials taking bribes in exchange for not taxing distillers. {{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=556–557}} Having obtained Grant's initial endorsement, "Let no guilty man escape if it can be avoided", Bristow moved quickly in 1875 to raid and shut down corrupt distilleries, collapsing the Ring.{{sfn|Kohn|p=417}} Bristow obtained 238 indictments, leading to 110 convictions, while millions of tax dollars were restored to the Treasury. {{sfn|Kohn|p=417}} Grant became defensive, however, after Bristow discovered that Babcock was involved in the Whiskey Ring, believing Babcock to be the innocent victim of a witch hunt.{{sfn|Smith|pp=591–593}} Grant denied immunity to minor Whiskey Ring conspirators in the Midwest.{{sfn|Kohn|p=417}} In 1876, Babcock was found not guilty at a trial in which Grant testified through a deposition on his behalf.{{sfn|Kohn|p=417}} After the trial, under public pressure, Grant dismissed Babcock from the White House.{{sfn|Smith|pp=591–593}}{{efn|McFeely, writing in 1981, believed that Grant knew Babcock was guilty, while Smith, in 2001, believed the evidence was circumstantial at best.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1p=415|Smith||2p=591}}}} Several convicted Whiskey Ring members were later pardoned by Grant.{{sfn|Kohn|p=417}}


Grant appointed ], under Bristow's recommendation, ] to prosecute the Ring in St. Louis, who indicted Grant's friend General ], supervisor of Internal Revenue.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=498}} Grant endorsed Bristow's investigation, writing on a letter "Let no guilty man escape..."{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=499}} Bristow's investigation discovered Babcock received kickback payments, and that Babcock had secretly forewarned McDonald, the ring's mastermind, of the investigation.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=252|White|2016|2p=562|Calhoun|2017|3pp=77–78}} On November 22, the jury convicted McDonald.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=515}} On December 9, Babcock was indicted; Grant refused to believe in Babcock's guilt and was ready to testify in Babcock's favor, but Fish warned that doing so would put Grant in the embarrassing position of testifying against a case prosecuted by his own administration.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1pp=805–06|Calhoun|2017|2pp=518, 522–523}} Instead, on February 12, 1876, Grant gave a deposition in Babcock's defense, expressing that his confidence in his secretary was "unshaken".{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=592–93|White|2016|2p=564|Simon|2002|p=252}} Grant's testimony silenced all but his strongest critics.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=592}}
Congress began several investigations into corruption in the administration, the most notable of which regarded profiteering at ]. The scheme involved Secretary of War ] selling concessions for trading posts on western army bases in exchange for a cut of the profits.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=560}} The accusations led to Belknap's resignation. Even after he resigned from office, the House of Representatives impeached Belknap.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=435–436}} He was only saved from conviction in the Senate because many Senators believed their jurisdiction ended when Belknap left office.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=435–436}} Congress also investigated and reprimanded Navy Secretary ] in 1876 for taking bribes from naval contractors, but he was never formally impeached.{{sfn|McFeely 1974|p=153}}


The St. Louis jury acquitted Babcock, and Grant allowed him to remain at the White House. However, after Babcock was indicted in a frame-up of a Washington reformer, called the Safe Burglary Conspiracy, Grant dismissed him. Babcock kept his position of Superintendent of Public Buildings in Washington.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1pp=591–593|Simon|2002|2p=252|Calhoun|2017|3p=527}}{{sfn|Martinez (March 15, 2021)}}
The Civil Service reform initiative had limited success, as Grant's cabinet implemented a merit system that increased qualified candidates and relied less on Congressional patronage.{{sfnm|Smith||1p=587–590|Simon 2002||2p=250}} Grant's appointed Secretary of Interior ], however, exempted the Interior Department from competitive examinations, while Congress refused to enact permanent Civil Service reform. Delano was forced to resign, having allowed a spoils system of land and patent frauds and ignored Interior department officials' award of surveying contracts to his son, who was paid without doing any of the contracted work.{{sfn|Smith|p=586}} Grant appointed ], who succeeded Delano and cleaned up the corruption in the Interior Department.{{sfn|Smith|p=587}}{{sfn|Simon||1p=250|Patrick||2p=172}} Grant appointed reformers ] and ] as Attorney General and Postmaster General, respectively, who supported Bristow's investigations. {{sfnm|Smith||1pp=584–585|Hesseltine||2p=366}} In 1875, Pierrepont cleaned up corruption among the ] and ] departments in the South.{{sfn|Hesseltine|p=374}} Grant suggested other reforms, as well, including the idea that each state should provide free ] to all children, although he also endorsed the ], which would have forbidden government aid to schools that have any religious affiliation.{{sfn|Smith|pp=570–571}}


The Interior Department under Secretary ], whom Grant appointed to replace Cox, was rife with fraud and corruption. The exception was Delano's effective oversight of ]. Grant reluctantly forced Delano's resignation. Surveyor General Silas Reed had set up corrupt contracts that benefited Delano's son, John Delano.{{sfn|McFeely|1974|pp=149–150}} Grant's Secretary of Interior ], who succeeded Delano in 1875, implemented reforms, fired corrupt agents and ended profiteering.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|1p=250|Patrick|1968|2p=172|White|2016|3p=560}} When Grant was informed by Postmaster ] of a potential Congressional investigation into an extortion scandal involving Attorney General ]' wife, Grant fired Williams and appointed reformer ]. Grant's new cabinet appointments temporarily appeased reformers.{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=557|Chernow|2017|2pp=787–788}}
===Judicial appointments===
]
{{main|List of federal judges appointed by Ulysses S. Grant}}
Grant appointed four Justices to the ]. The first two vacancies occurred in 1869 with the retirement of ] and Congress's restoration of a ninth seat on the Court.{{efn|Congress had changed the law in 1866 to eliminate one seat on the Court each time a justice retired, to prevent Andrew Johnson from nominating replacements for them. When Grant took office, there were eight seats on the bench.{{sfn|Smith|pp=506–507}}}}{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=387}} Grant appointed former Secretary of War ] and Attorney General ].{{sfn|Smith|pp=506–507}} Neither man would take his seat: Stanton was confirmed, but died before he took office; Hoar was widely disliked in the Senate, which defeated his nomination 24–33.{{sfn|Smith|pp=506–507}} Following a cabinet discussion, Grant submitted two more names to the Senate: ] and ]. Strong was a former justice of the ] who retired to take up a private practice in Philadelphia. Bradley, a New Jersey lawyer, also had a successful private practice. Both men were railroad lawyers, and their appointment led to accusations that Grant intended them to overturn the case of ''],'' which had been decided the same day they were nominated. That case, which was unpopular with business interests, held that the federal debt incurred before 1862 must be paid in gold, not ].{{sfn|Smith|pp=507–508}} Nonetheless, both Strong and Bradley were confirmed and the following year ''Hepburn'' was indeed reversed.{{sfn|Smith|pp=507–508}}


After the Democrats took control of the House in 1875, more corruption in federal departments was exposed.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1p=429|White|2016|2p=554}} Among the most damaging scandal involved Secretary of War ], who took quarterly ] from the ]; he resigned in February 1876.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=560–561|Donovan|2008|2p=104|Simon|2002|3p=252|Chernow|2017|pp=820–821}} Belknap was impeached by the House but was acquitted by the Senate.{{sfn|Simon|2002|p=252}} Grant's brother Orvil set up "silent partnerships" and received kickbacks from four trading posts.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=819–20}} Congress discovered that Secretary of Navy Robeson had been bribed by a naval contractor, but no articles of impeachment were drawn up.{{sfn|McFeely|1974|p=153}} In his December 5, 1876, Annual Message, Grant apologized to the nation: "Failures have been errors of judgement, not of intent."{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=441–42}}
After Grant's reelection, another Supreme Court seat opened up with the retirement of Justice ].{{sfn|Smith|pp=558–563}} Grant nominated ], a New York state judge, to replace him. Hunt was confirmed in 1873 and, like Nelson, upheld Reconstruction legislation. He served on the court until 1882.{{sfn|Smith|pp=558–563}} In May 1873, Chief Justice ] died suddenly. After several months, Grant offered the seat to Conkling.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=387–389}} Conkling declined, as did Senator ] of Wisconsin.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=387–389}} Grant unsuccessfully tried to enlist Hamilton Fish for the job and considered nominating ], as well, before submitting the name of his attorney general, ].{{sfn|Smith|pp=558–563}} The Senate had a dim view of Williams's performance at the Justice Department and refused to act on the nomination. Grant stuck to his choice, but after no action Williams asked that his name be withdrawn in January 1874.{{sfn|Smith|pp=558–563}} Fish suggested nominating Hoar again, but Grant instead chose Cushing. Cushing was an eminent lawyer and respected in his field, but the emergence of his wartime correspondence with Jefferson Davis doomed his nomination.{{sfn|Smith|pp=558–563}} Grant finally turned to ], a respectable (if little-known) Ohio lawyer who had worked on the ''Alabama'' claims arbitration.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=392–393}} The Senate unanimously approved the nomination two days later, on January 21, 1874. Waite was an uncontroversial nominee, but in his time on the Court he authored two of the decisions ('']'' and '']'') that did the most to undermine Reconstruction-era laws for the protection of black Americans.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=387–389}}


===Election of 1876=== ===Election of 1876===
{{main|1876 United States presidential election}}
By 1876, the collected scandals of the last eight years and the Democratic gains in the House led many in the Republican party to repudiate Grant.{{sfnm|McFeely 1981||1pp=440–441|Patrick||2p=255}} Bristow was among the leading candidates to replace him, suggesting that a large faction desired an end to "Grantism" and feared that Grant would run for a third term.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=440–441}} Ultimately, Grant did not run, but neither was Bristow the nominee, as the convention settled on Governor ] of Ohio, a reformer. The Democrats nominated ] of New York, and ] was undecided for several months, because of voting irregularities in three Southern states.{{sfn|Smith|p=598}} Grant told Congress to settle the matter through legislation without blaming either party.{{sfn|Patrick|p=263}} Grant mobilized troops in Louisiana and South Carolina, who kept the peace.{{sfn|Patrick|p=264}} Grant assured both sides that he would not use the army to force a result, except to curb violence, and agreed to the formation of an ] to decide the matter.{{sfnm|Smith||1p=601|Patrick||2p=267}} The result was the ]: Hayes was elected, but the last troops would be withdrawn from Southern capitals.{{sfn|Smith|p=604}} The Republicans had won, but Reconstruction was over.


The abandonment of Reconstruction played a central role during the 1876 election.{{sfn|Simon|2002|pp=252–53}} Mounting investigations into corruption by the House, controlled by the Democrats, discredited Grant's presidency.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=440–41|Patrick|1968|2p=255|Simon|2002|3pp=252–253}} Grant did not run for a third term, while the Republicans chose Governor ] of Ohio, a reformer, at their convention.{{sfnm|Simon|2002|pp=252–253|McFeely|1981|2pp=440–441|Smith|2001|3pp=586, 596}} The Democrats nominated Governor ] of New York. Voting irregularities in three Southern states caused the election to remain undecided for several months.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=597–98}}<ref>{{cite web|title=Election of 1876|url=https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/elections/1876 |work=The American Presidency Project |publisher=University of California, Santa Barbara}}</ref>
==Post-presidency==
]
{{main|Post-presidential life of Ulysses S. Grant}}


Grant told Congress to settle the matter through legislation and assured both sides that he would not use the army to force a result, except to curb violence. On January 29, 1877, he signed legislation forming an ],{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=601–603}} which ruled Hayes elected president; to forestall Democratic protests, Republicans agreed to the ], in which the last troops were withdrawn from Southern capitals. With Reconstruction dead, 80 years of ] segregation was launched.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=604|Chernow|2017|2p=858}} Grant's "calm visage" throughout the election crisis appeased the nation.{{sfn|Smith|2001|pp=603–604}}
===World tour===
Leaving the White House, Grant and family stayed with friends in New York, Ohio, and Philadelphia for two months before setting out on a tour of the world.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=448–449}} The trip, which would last two years, began in Liverpool in May 1877 where enormous crowds greeted the ex-president and his entourage.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=454–455}} Travelling to London, the Grants dined with ] at ] and Grant gave several speeches in the city.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=581–583}} They next traveled to Belgium, Germany, and Switzerland before returning to England. The Grants spent a few months with their daughter, ], who had married an Englishman and moved to that country several years before. Returning to the continent, Grant and his wife journeyed on to France and Italy, spending Christmas 1877 aboard ], a warship docked in Palermo.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=460–465}} After a winter sojourn in the Holy Land, they visited Greece before returning to Italy and a meeting with ].{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=466–467}} Travelling to Spain and then to Germany again, Grant met with Chancellor ]; the two men discussed military matters.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=585–586}}


==Post-presidency (1877–1885)==
After another visit to England and then to Ireland, the Grants left Europe by ship, sailing through the ] to India. They visited Bombay, Lucknow, Varanasi, and Delhi, being welcomed in each city by the colonial officials.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=471–473}} After India, it was on to Burma, Siam (where Grant met King ],) Singapore, and Vietnam.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=590–591}} Traveling on to Hong Kong, Grant began to change his mind on the nature of colonization, believing that the British rule was not "purely selfish" but also good for the colonial subjects.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=471–473}} Leaving Hong Kong, the Grants entered China proper, seeing the cities of Canton, Shanghai, and Peking. He declined to request an interview with the ], a child of seven, but did speak with the head of government, ], and ], a leading general.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=591–592}} They discussed China's dispute with Japan over the ], and Grant agreed to help bring the two sides to agreement.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=593–594}} After crossing over to Japan and meeting the ], Grant convinced China to acquiesce in Japanese annexation of the islands, and the two nations avoided war.{{sfn|Smith|pp=612n–613n}}
{{main|Post-presidency of Ulysses S. Grant}}
After leaving the White House, Grant said he "was never so happy in my life". The Grants left Washington for New York, to attend the birth of their daughter Nellie's child. Calling themselves "]s", the Grants toured ], ], Chicago, and ], without a clear idea of where they would live.{{sfnm|Chernow|2017|1p=862|White|2016|2p=587}}


===World tour and diplomacy===
By then the Grants had been gone two years, and were homesick. They crossed the Pacific and landed in San Francisco in September 1879, greeted by cheering crowds.{{sfn|Smith|p=613}} After a visit to ], they returned at last to Philadelphia on December 16, 1879.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=477}} The two-and-a-half-year voyage around the world had captured popular imagination, and Republicans—especially those of the new ] faction, who had excluded from the Hayes administration—saw Grant in a new light.{{sfn|Smith|pp=614–615}} With Hayes having forsworn a second term when he was elected, the nomination for 1880 was wide open, and many thought that Grant was the man for the job.{{sfn|Smith|pp=614–615}}
{{main|World tour of Ulysses S. Grant}}
]

Using $25,000 (equivalent to ${{formatnum:{{Inflation|US|25000|1877|r=-3}}}} in {{Inflation/year|US}}) from liquidating an investment in a Nevada-based mining company, the Grants set out on a world tour for approximately two and a half years.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=448–449|White|2016|2p=587}}{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=387}} On May 16, Grant and his wife left for England aboard the ].{{sfn|White|2016|p=590}} During the tour, the Grants made stops in Europe, Africa, India, the ] and the ], meeting with notable dignitaries such as ], ], ], ], ], and ].{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=872}}

As a courtesy to Grant by the ], his touring party received federal transportation on three U.S. Navy ships: a five-month tour of the ] on the ], travel from Hong Kong to China on the ], and from China to Japan on the ].{{sfn|White|2016|pp=597–602, 608–10}} The Hayes administration encouraged Grant to assume a public unofficial diplomatic role and strengthen American interests abroad during the tour.{{sfn|Campbell|2016|pp=xi–xii, 2–3}} Homesick, the Grants left Japan on the ] and landed in San Francisco on September 20, 1879, greeted by cheering crowds.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=613|Chernow|2017|2pp=881–83}} Grant's tour demonstrated to Europe and Asia that the United States was an emerging world power.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=871}}
{{clear}}


===Third term attempt=== ===Third term attempt===
]
{{main|1880 Republican National Convention}} {{main|1880 Republican National Convention}}
] lampooned Grant and his associates. '']'', 1880]]
The Stalwarts, led by Grant's old political ally, ], saw the ex-president's renewed popularity as a way for their faction to regain prominence. Grant said nothing publicly, but privately he wanted the job and encouraged his men.{{sfn|Hesseltine|pp=432–39}} ] wrote to Grant in February 1880, urging him to run; Grant demurred, saying he would be happy for the Republicans to win with another candidate, though he preferred ] to ].{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=600–601}} Even so, Conkling and ] began to organize delegates in Grant's favor. When ] convened in Chicago in June there were more delegates pledged to Grant than to any other candidate, but he was short of a majority.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=600–601}}


Politically conservative,<ref>Compromise and Political Action Political Morality in Liberal and Democratic Life By J. Patrick Dobel, 1990, P.11</ref> Grant was supported by the ] who, led by Grant's old political ally ], saw Grant's renewed popularity as an opportunity, and sought to nominate him for the presidency in ]. Opponents called it a violation of the unofficial two-term rule in use since George Washington. Grant said nothing publicly but wanted the job and encouraged his men.{{sfn|Hesseltine|1957|pp=432–439}} Washburne urged him to run; Grant demurred. Even so, Conkling and ] began to organize delegates in Grant's favor. When ] convened in Chicago in June, more delegates were pledged to Grant than to any other candidate, but he was still short of a majority vote.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=600–601}}
Grant's popularity was high, but fading. Washburne conjectured that had Grant stayed abroad longer, the wave of adulation that greeted him on his return might have carried him all the way back to the White House.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=479–481}} Conkling placed Grant's name in nomination with an elegant speech, his most famous line being: "When asked which state he hails from, our sole reply shall be, he hails from ] and its famous apple tree."{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=600–601}} With 370 votes needed for nomination, the first ballot had Grant at 304, Blaine at 284, Sherman at 93, and the rest scattered to minor candidates.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=479–481}} Subsequent ballots followed, with roughly the same result; neither Grant nor Blaine could win.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=602}} After thirty-six ballots, Blaine's delegates deserted him and combined with those of other candidates to nominate a compromise candidate: Representative ] of Ohio.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=602}} Grant received 306 votes on the final ballot, his supporters staying committed to their man to the bitter end.{{sfn|Smith|p=617}} Logan moved that the nomination be made unanimous, and it was, but those 306 Stalwarts were immortalized in Republican myth.{{sfn|Smith|p=617}}


Grant accepted his defeat, even claiming to be relieved at the result.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=602}} He gave speeches for Garfield, but declined to criticize the Democratic nominee, ], a general who had served under Grant in the Army of the Potomac.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=604–605}} Garfield was elected by a narrow popular margin, but a solid Electoral College vote—214 to 155.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=604–605}} After the election, Grant gave Garfield his public support, but also pushed him to include Stalwarts in his administration.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=607–609}} At the convention, Conkling nominated Grant with an eloquent speech, the most famous line being "When asked which state he hails from, our sole reply shall be, he hails from Appomattox and its famous apple tree."{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=600–601}} With 378 votes needed for the nomination, the first ballot had Grant at 304, Blaine at 284, Sherman at 93, and the rest to minor candidates.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=479–481}} After thirty-six ballots, Blaine's delegates combined with those of other candidates to nominate a compromise candidate: ].{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=602}} A procedural motion made the vote unanimous for Garfield.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=617}} Grant gave speeches for Garfield but declined to criticize the Democratic nominee, ], a general who had served under him.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=604–605}} Garfield won the election. Grant gave Garfield his public support and pushed him to include Stalwarts in his administration.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=607–609}} On July 2, 1881, Garfield was shot by an assassin and died on September 19. On learning of Garfield's death from a reporter, Grant wept.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=613–614}}


===Grant & Ward=== ===Business failures===
Grant's world tour, although successful, was costly. When he returned to America, Grant had depleted most of his savings and needed to earn money and find a new home.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=611}} ] and ], wealthy friends of Grant, bought him a home on Manhattan's ].{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=486–489}} To provide for an income, Grant, Jay Gould, and former Mexican Finance Secretary ] chartered the Mexican Southern Railroad, which planned to build a railroad from Oaxaca to Mexico City.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=486–489}} At the same time, Grant used his influence to convince ], who had succeeded Garfield as president in 1881, to negotiate a free trade treaty with Mexico. Arthur and the Mexican government agreed, but the United States Senate rejected the treaty in 1883.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=486–489}} The railroad was similarly unsuccessful, falling into bankruptcy the following year.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=486–489}} In the 19th century, there were no federal ], and the Grants' personal income was $6,000 a year.{{sfn|Bunting|2004|p=151}} Grant's world tour had been costly, and he had depleted most of his savings.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=611}} Wealthy friends bought him a house on Manhattan's ], and to make an income, Grant, Jay Gould, and former Mexican Finance Secretary ] chartered the ], with plans to build a railroad from Oaxaca to Mexico City. Grant urged President ] to negotiate a free trade treaty with Mexico. Arthur and the Mexican government agreed, but the United States Senate rejected the treaty in 1883. The railroad was similarly unsuccessful, falling into bankruptcy the following year.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=486–89}}


At the same time, Grant's son ] ("Buck") had opened a Wall Street brokerage house with ]. Ward was regarded as a rising star, and the firm, Grant & Ward, was initially successful.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=488–91}} In 1883, Grant joined the firm and invested $100,000 of his own money.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=619}} The firm's success attracted more investors, who bought ] through them, then used the securities as collateral to borrow money to buy more securities. Grant & Ward then pledged that collateral to borrow more money to trade in securities on the firm's own account. The practice–called ]–was legal and accepted; what was illegal was ''rehypothecation'', the practice of pledging the same securities as collateral for multiple loans.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=488–91}} Ward, with the collusion of the bank involved, did this for many of the firm's assets. If the trades resulted in profit, then there would be no problem; if they went bad, however, multiple loans would come due, all backed up by the same collateral. Historians acknowledge that Grant was likely unaware of Ward's tactics, but it is unclear how much Buck Grant knew. In May 1884, enough investments went bad to convince Ward that the firm would soon be bankrupted. He told Grant of the impending failure, but suggested that it was a temporary shortfall.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=620–621}} Grant approached businessman ], who gave Grant a personal loan of $150,000.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=492–93}} Grant invested the money in the firm, but it was not enough to save the firm from failure. Essentially penniless, but compelled by a sense of personal honor, Grant repaid Vanderbilt with his Civil War mementos. Although the market value did not cover the loan, Vanderbilt insisted it was paid in full. The matter left Grant financially destitute.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=620–621}} At the same time, Grant's son Buck had opened a Wall Street brokerage house with ]. A conniving man who swindled numerous wealthy men, Ward was at the time regarded as a rising star on Wall Street. The firm, Grant & Ward, was initially successful.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=488–91|Ward|2012}} In 1883, Grant joined the firm and invested $100,000 (~${{Format price|{{Inflation|index=US-GDP|value=100000|start_year=1883}}}} in {{Inflation/year|US-GDP}}) of his own money.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=619}} Ward paid investors abnormally high interest by pledging the company's securities on multiple loans in a process called ] (now regarded as a ]).{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=488–91}} Ward, in collusion with banker James D. Fish and kept secret from ]s, retrieved the firm's securities from the company's bank vault.{{sfn|White|2016|pp=627–29}} When the trades went bad, multiple loans came due, all backed by the same collateral.<ref name="grant-and-ward"/>


Historians agree that the elder Grant was likely unaware of Ward's intentions, but it is unclear how much Buck Grant knew. In May 1884, enough investments went bad to convince Ward that the firm would soon be bankrupt. Ward, who assumed Grant was "a child in business matters",{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=917}} told him of the impending failure, but assured Grant that this was a temporary shortfall.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=620–21|White|2016|2pp=627–629}} Grant approached businessman ], who gave him a personal loan of $150,000.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=492–93}} Grant invested the money in the firm, but it was not enough to save it. The fall of Grant & Ward set off the ].<ref name="grant-and-ward">{{cite news |last1=King |first1=Gilbert |title=War and Peace of Mind for Ulysses S. Grant |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/war-and-peace-of-mind-for-ulysses-s-grant-1882227/ |work=] |date=January 16, 2013}}</ref>
===Memoirs and death===
]
Grant had forfeited his military pension when he assumed the presidency, but Congress restored him to the rank of General of the Army with full retirement pay in March 1885.{{sfn|Smith|pp=625}} Around the same time, Grant learned that he was suffering from ].{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=622–626}}{{efn|Today, medical historians believed he suffered from a T<sub>1</sub>N<sub>1</sub> carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa.{{sfn|Renehan & Lowry|pp=377–383}}}} To restore his family's income, Grant wrote several articles on his Civil War campaigns for '']'' at $500 each. The articles were well received by critics, and the editor, ], suggested Grant write a book of memoirs, as Sherman and others had successfully done.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=494}}


Vanderbilt offered to forgive Grant's debt entirely, but Grant refused.<ref>{{Cite news |date=May 22, 1884 |title=General Grant's Example: He Declines Mr. Vanderbilt's Offer to Relieve Him from His Debt |page=3G |work=]}}</ref> Impoverished but compelled by personal honor, he repaid what he could with his Civil War mementos and the sale or transfer of all other assets.{{sfn|Perry|2004|p=xxix}} Vanderbilt took title to Grant's home, although he allowed the Grants to continue to reside there, and pledged to donate the souvenirs to the federal government and insisted the debt had been paid in full.{{sfnm|White|2016|1pp=632–33|Brands|2012a|2pp=620–21}} Grant was distraught over Ward's deception and asked privately how he could ever "trust any human being again."{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=621}} In March 1885, he testified against both Ward and Fish.{{sfnm|Badeau|1887|1p=447|2a1=Mackowski|2a2=White|2y=2015|2p=169}} After the collapse of Grant & Ward, there was an outpouring of sympathy for Grant.{{sfn|Chernow|2017|pp=925–26}}
Grant took up the project and asked his former staff officer, ], to review his work. Grant's son ] assisted with references and proofreading. ''Century'' offered Grant a book contract with a 10% royalty, but Grant's friend, ], made his own offer to Grant for his memoirs, proposing a 75% royalty. Grant ultimately decided on Twain's publishing company, Charles L. Webster and Co.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=501–505}} Grant worked diligently on the memoir at his home in New York City and at the end from a ] on the slopes of ], finishing shortly before he died on July 23, 1885.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=629–630}} The book, entitled '']'', was a success. In the end, Julia Grant received about $450,000, suggesting a royalty of about 30%.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|pp=501–505}} The memoir has been highly regarded by the general public, military historians and literary critics.{{sfn|Wilson|pp= 131–73}} Grant was a shrewd and effective writer, portraying himself in the persona of the honorable Western hero, whose strength lies in his honesty and straightforwardness. He candidly depicts his battles against both the Confederates and internal Army foes.{{sfn|Russell|pp=189–209}} Twain called the ''Memoirs'' a "literary masterpiece", and others including ] and ] agree; it may be the "single most important" and influential work of American ].{{sfn|Perry|pp=234–235}}


===Memoirs, military pension, illness and death===
Grant died on July 23, 1885, at the age of 63.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=517}} Sheridan, by now ], ordered a day-long tribute to Grant on all military posts, and President ] ordered a thirty-day nationwide period of mourning. After private services in Mount McGregor and lying in state in the ] at Albany, Grant's body was placed on a funeral train and traveled via West Point to New York City, where a quarter of a million people viewed in the two days prior to the funeral.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=633–635}} Tens of thousands of men, many of them veterans from the ] or other veterans’ organizations marched with Grant’s casket as it was drawn by two dozen horses to ].{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=633–635}} His pallbearers included Union generals Sherman and Sheridan, Confederate generals ] and ], Admiral ] and ], the head of the GAR.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=633–635}} His body was laid to rest in Riverside Park, first in a temporary tomb and finally in a ] in a circular ] at the ] ("Grant's Tomb"), the largest ] in North America. Attendance at the New York funeral topped 1.5 million.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|pp=633–635}} Ceremonies were held in other major cities around the country, and those who eulogized Grant in the press likened him to ] and ].{{sfn|Waugh|pp=215–259}}
{{Main|Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant}}
], less than a month before his death]]


Grant attended a service for Civil War veterans in ], on August 4, 1884, receiving a standing ovation from the ten thousand attendees; it would be his last public appearance.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|pp=495–496}} In the summer of 1884, Grant complained of a sore throat but put off seeing a doctor until late October, when he learned it was cancer, possibly caused by his frequent cigar smoking.{{sfnm|White|2016|1p=636|Waugh|2009|2p=277}} Grant chose not to reveal the seriousness of his condition to his wife, who soon found out from Grant's doctor.{{sfn|White|2016|p=637}} In March 1885, '']'' announced that Grant was dying of cancer, causing nationwide public concern.{{sfnm|Brands|2012a|1pp=622–662|Smith|2001|2p=625}}<ref>{{Cite news |title=TimesMachine: Sunday March 1, 1885 - NYTimes.com |url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1885/03/01/102955665.html?zoom=15.65 |access-date=2024-10-14 |work=The New York Times |language=en |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Knowing of Grant and Julia's financial difficulties, Congress restored him to the rank of General of the Army with full retirement pay—Grant's assumption of the presidency had required that he resign his commission and forfeit his (and his widow's) pension.{{sfnm|Smith|2001|1p=625|White|2016|2p=641}}
==Legacy==
], known colloquially as "Grant's Tomb", is the largest ] in North America, and one of the largest in the world.]]


Grant was nearly penniless and worried about leaving his wife money to live on. He approached '']'' and wrote a number of articles on his Civil War campaigns for $500 ({{Inflation|US|500|1885|r=-3|fmt=eq}}) each. The articles were well received by critics, and the editor, ], suggested that Grant write a memoir, as Sherman and others had done.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|p=494}} The magazine offered him a book contract with a 10% royalty. However, Grant's friend ], one of the few who understood Grant's precarious financial condition, offered him an unheard-of 70% royalty.<ref name="grant-and-ward"/> To provide for his family, Grant worked intensely on his memoirs in New York City. His former staff member ] assisted with the research, while his son ] located documents and did much of the fact-checking.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|p=625}} Because of the summer heat and humidity, his doctors recommended that he move upstate to ] at the top of ], offered by a family friend.{{sfn|White|2016|p=646}}
===Historical reputation===
Few presidents' reputations have changed as dramatically as Grant's.{{sfn|Foner 2012}} After his death, Grant was popularly seen as "a symbol of the American national identity and memory."{{sfn|Waugh|p=2}} Millions of people turned out for his funeral procession in 1885 and attended the 1897 dedication of his tomb.{{sfn|Waugh|p=2}} At the same time, however, scholars portrayed his as the most corrupt administration in American history.{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=521}} Northerners who desired national reconciliation distorted Grant's reputation, regarding the Union and Confederate causes on equal moral terms.{{sfn|Waugh|p=3}} In the 1930s biographer ], noted that Grant's reputation worsened because ""his enemies wrote better than his friends."{{sfn|Smith|p=14}} In 1931, the ] praised Grant's military vision and his execution of that vision in defeating the Confederacy, but of his political career, the authors were less complimentary.{{sfn|Paxson & Bach|pp=497–501}} Speaking specifically of the scandals, they wrote that "personal scandal has not touched Grant in any plausible form, but it struck so close to him and so frequently as to necessitate the vindication of his honor by admitting his bad taste in the choice of associates."{{sfn|Paxson & Bach|p=500}} ] won the ] for his negative 1981 biography that concluded, "He did not rise above limited talents or inspire others to do so in ways that make his administration a credit to American politics."{{sfn|McFeely 1981|p=522}}


On July 18, 1885, Grant finished his memoir,{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=629–630}} which includes the events of his life to the end of the Civil War.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=627}} The '']'' was a critical and commercial success. Julia Grant eventually received about $450,000 in royalties ({{Inflation|US|450000|1885|r=-5|fmt=eq}}). The memoir has been highly regarded by the public, military historians, and literary critics.<ref name="grant-and-ward"/> Grant portrayed himself as an honorable Western hero, whose strength lies in his honesty. He candidly depicted his battles against both the Confederates and internal army foes.{{sfn|Russell|1990|pp=189–209}}
Since 1990, historians have since taken a more favorable view, appreciating his protection of African Americans during Reconstruction, and his peace policy towards American Indians, even though those policies failed.{{sfn|Waugh|p=2}} Bruce Catton began the reassessment of Grant's military career in the 1960s, shifting the consensus from Grant as victor by brute force to that of a successful and skillful commander.{{sfn|Simon 1982|p=220}} ] wrote of McFeely's assessment, "Grant's failure as President ... lies in the failure of the Indian peace policy and the collapse of Reconstruction.... But if Grant tried and failed, who could have succeeded?"{{sfn|Simon 1982|p=221}} Simon stated that had Grant been assessed only for his first term in office he would be considered one of the United States ablest presidents, "remembered for his staunch enforcement of the rights of freedmen combined with conciliation of former Confederates, for reform in Indian policy and civil service, for successful negotiation of the Alabama Claims, and for delivery of peace and prosperity."{{sfn|Simon 2002|p=??}} However, Simon believes Grant's second term in office was weakened by the Liberal defections, the Panic of 1873, increase of scandals, and the North's retreat from Reconstruction.{{sfn|Simon 2002|p=??}}


]
The reconstruction of Grant's reputation continued with ]'s 2001 biography. Smith argued that the same qualities that made Grant a success as a general carried over to his political life to make him, if not a successful president, than certainly an admirable one.{{sfn|Weigley|p=1105}} Smith wrote that "the common thread is strength of character—an indomitable will that never flagged in the face of adversity.... Sometimes he blundered badly; often he oversimplified; yet he saw his goals clearly and moved toward them relentlessly."{{sfn|Smith|p=15}} ] continued Grant's rehabilitation in his 2012 book, ''The Man Who Saved the Union: Ulysses Grant in War and Peace''. In addition to praising Grant's skill as a general, Brands's book, as Eric Foner wrote in a review, gives "a sympathetic account of Grant’s forceful and temporarily successful effort as president to crush the Ku Klux Klan, which had inaugurated a reign of terror against the former slaves."{{sfn|Foner 2012}} Brands write favorably of Grant's military and political careers, alike, saying:
{{blockquote|As commanding general in the Civil War, he had defeated secession and destroyed slavery, secession's cause. As President during Reconstruction he had guided the South back into the Union. By the end of his public life the Union was more secure than at any previous time in the history of the nation. And no one had done more to produce the result than he.{{sfn|Brands 2012a|p=636}}}}


Grant died in the Mount McGregor cottage on July 23, 1885.{{sfn|McFeely|1981|p=517}} Sheridan, then Commanding General of the Army, ordered a day-long tribute to Grant on all military posts, and President ] ordered a thirty-day nationwide period of mourning. After private services, the honor guard placed Grant's body on a ], which traveled to West Point and New York City. A quarter of a million people viewed it in the two days before the funeral.<ref name="grant-and-ward"/> Tens of thousands of men, many of them veterans from the ] (GAR), marched with Grant's casket drawn by two dozen black stallions to ] in ].{{sfn|Chernow|2017|p=955}} His pallbearers included Union generals Sherman and Sheridan, Confederate generals ] and ], Admiral ], and Senator ], the head of the GAR.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=633–35}} Following the casket in the {{convert|7|mi|km|adj=mid|-long|spell=in}} procession were President Cleveland, two former living presidents Hayes and Arthur, all of the president's cabinet, and justices of the Supreme Court.{{sfn|Smith|2001|p=19}}
===Memorials and library===
] since 1913.]]
{{see also|Ulysses S. Grant cultural depictions}}
Grant has a number of memorials in his honor, including the ] in New York and the ] in Washington. There are smaller memorials in Chicago's ] and Philadelphia's ]. ] is named in his honor, as are ]. From 1890 to 1940, a portion of what is now ] was called General Grant National Park, named for the ]. He has appeared on the front of the ] since 1913, and also ]. In early 2010, the ] proposed Grant as a finalist in a statewide vote for inclusion in ] at the ], but Grant was defeated by ] in a statewide vote.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2012/05/16/3-of-ohios-favorite-sons-vie-for-statuary-hall-in-d-c-.html |title=3 of Ohio’s favorite sons vie for Statuary Hall in D.C. |accessdate=2013-08-20}}</ref>


Attendance at the New York funeral topped 1.5&nbsp;million.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=633–635}} Ceremonies were held in other major cities around the country, while Grant was eulogized in the press.{{sfn|Waugh|2009|pp=215–259}} Grant's body was laid to rest in Riverside Park, first in a temporary tomb, and then on April 17, 1897, in the General Grant National Memorial, known as "]", the largest ] in North America.{{sfn|Brands|2012a|pp=633–35}}
In May 2012, on the fiftieth anniversary of the founding of the Ulysses S. Grant Foundation, ] was selected as the permanent location for Ulysses S. Grant's Presidential Library. President Grant's artifacts are to remain permanently at the Mitchell Memorial Library on the MSU campus. The MSU library cataloged and cross-referenced 15,000 linear feet of material. Grant's letters have been divided into 31 volumes while a 32nd volume is due to be released.<ref>{{cite web| title = Ulysses S. Grant Presidential Library| publisher = Mississippi State University| year = 2011 | url = http://www.usgrantlibrary.org/ | accessdate = 2013-10-27}}</ref>

==Historical reputation==
{{Main|Historical reputation of Ulysses S. Grant}}
{{See also|List of memorials to Ulysses S. Grant|Cultural depictions of Ulysses S. Grant}}
]

Grant was hailed across the North as the General who "saved the Union" and overall his military reputation has held up well. Achieving great national fame for his victories at ] and the surrender at ], Grant was the most successful general, Union or Confederate, in the American Civil War.{{sfn|Bonekemper|2012|p=xiii}} He was criticized by the South for using excessive force,{{sfnm|Bonekemper|2011|White|2016|2pp=287–88}} and his drinking was often exaggerated by the press and stereotyped by rivals and critics.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=55, 77|Waugh|2009|2pp=39–40}} Historians also debate how effective Grant was at halting corruption.{{sfn|White|2016|p=539}} The scandals during his administration stigmatized his political reputation.{{sfn|Calhoun|2017|p=592}}

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Grant's reputation was damaged by the "]" movement and the ].{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=521–22|White|2016|2p=xxiii|Calhoun|2017|3p=587}} Views of Grant reached new lows as he was seen as an unsuccessful president and an unskilled, if lucky, general.{{sfn|Brands|2012b|p=45}} In the 1950s, some historians reassessed Grant's military career, shifting the analysis of Grant as the victor by brute force to that of skillful modern strategist and commander.{{sfn|Rafuse|2007|p=851}} Historian ]'s biography, ''Grant'' (1981), won the ], and brought renewed scholarly interest in Grant. McFeely believed Grant was an "ordinary American" trying to "make his mark" during the 19th century.{{sfnm|McFeely|1981|1pp=xii, xiii, 522|White|2016|2p=xxiv}} In the 21st century, Grant's reputation improved markedly among historians after the publication of ''Grant'' (2001), by historian ].<ref name="C-SPAN Survey on Presidents PDF 2017">{{cite web <!--Author specified in properties of PDF-->|last=Swain |first=Susan |title=C-SPAN Releases Third Historians Survey of Presidential Leadership |website=] |date=February 17, 2017 |url=https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurvey2017/?personid=39801 |access-date=June 30, 2020 |quote=The most-average U.S. president, as rated by our historian participants is Ulysses S. Grant, who ranks 22 out of 43 presidents.}}</ref><ref name="C-SPAN Survey on Presidents 2017 2001">{{cite web |title=Ulysses S. Grant |website=] |date=September 4, 2001 |url=https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurvey2017/?personid=39801 |access-date=June 30, 2020}}</ref> Opinions of Grant's presidency demonstrate a better appreciation of Grant's personal integrity, Reconstruction efforts, and peace policy towards Indians, even when they fell short.{{sfnm|Waugh|2009|1p=2|Stiles|2016}}<ref>{{cite news|title=Today's historians have a higher opinion of Ulysses S. Grant|url=https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21729978-though-his-presidency-was-famous-corruption-his-personal-integrity-and|newspaper=]|date=October 5, 2017}}</ref> ]' ''The Man Who Saved the Union'' (2012), ]'s ''American Ulysses'' (2016), and ]'s '']'' (2017) continued the elevation of Grant's reputation.<ref>{{cite news |last=Maslin |first=Janet |title=In Ron Chernow's 'Grant,' an American Giant's Makeover Continues |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/10/books/review-grant-biography-ron-chernow.html |newspaper=] |date=October 10, 2017}}</ref> White said that Grant "demonstrated a distinctive sense of humility, moral courage, and determination", and as president he "stood up for African Americans, especially fighting against voter suppression perpetrated by the Ku Klux Klan".{{sfn|Hunt|2017}} White believed that Grant was "an exceptional person and leader".{{sfn|White|2016|p=xxiv}} Historian Robert Farley writes that the "Cult of Lee" and the ]'s resentment of Grant for his defeat of Lee and his strong enforcement of Reconstruction resulted in Grant's shoddy treatment by historians.{{sfn|Farley 2021}}

In a 2021 ] survey ], Grant was ranked 20 out of 44 presidents, up from his previous ranking of 33 in 2017. This was due to the rehabilitation of his image and legacy in recent years, with Grant now receiving "more credit for Reconstruction and his diplomacy than condemnation for his alleged corruption."<ref>{{Cite news|last=Brockell|first=Gillian|date=June 30, 2021|title=Historians just ranked the presidents. Trump wasn't last.|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2021/06/30/presidential-rankings-2021-cspan-historians/|newspaper=]|access-date=July 3, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230703195306/https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2021/06/30/presidential-rankings-2021-cspan-historians/|archive-date=July 3, 2023|url-access=subscription}}</ref>

==Dates of rank==
{| class="wikitable"
|+
! Insignia !! Rank !! Date !! Component
|-
|''No insignia'' || ] || July 1, 1839 || ]
|-
|] || ] || July 1, 1843 || Regular Army
|-
|] || ] || September 30, 1845 || Regular Army
|-
|] || ] || September 8, 1847 || Regular Army
|-
|] || ] || September 16, 1847 || Regular Army
|-
|] || ] || August 5, 1853 || Regular Army<br />(resigned July 31, 1854)
|-
|] || ] || June 17, 1861 || Volunteers
|-
|] || ] || August 7, 1861 || Volunteers<br />(to rank from May 17, 1861)
|-
|] || ] || February 16, 1862 || Volunteers
|-
|] || ] || July 4, 1863 || Regular Army
|-
|] || ] || March 4, 1864 || Regular Army
|-
|] || ]|| July 25, 1866 || Regular Army
|-
|''No insignia'' || ] || April 19, 2024 (posthumous) || Regular Army
|-
| colspan="4" style="text-align: center;" | '''Sources:'''<ref>]. Francis B. Heitman. 1903. Vol. 1. p. 470.</ref><ref>{{cite tweet |last=Simpson |first=Brooks D. |author-link=Brooks D. Simpson |user=BrooksDSimpson |number=1844824822205088223 |date=October 11, 2024 |title=Someone got promoted! |access-date=October 12, 2024 |quote=]] Memorandum for the Secretary of the Army; Subject: Posthumous Advancement on the Retired List; . . . General Ulysses S. Grant . . . to the grade of General of the Armies . . .}}</ref>
|}


==See also== ==See also==
* ]
{{Portal|Biography|United States Army|American Civil War|Military of the United States|Government of the United States|Politics}}
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]


==Notes== ==Notes==
{{notes}} {{notelist}}


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist|20em}} {{reflist|22em}}


==Sources== ==Bibliography==
===Biographical===
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book |last=Badeau |first=Adam |author-link=Adam Badeau |year=1887 |title=Grant in Peace: From Appomattox to Mount McGregor |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aG1LAAAAYAAJ |publisher=S. S. Scranton & Company |isbn=978-0-8369-5723-5}}
* {{cite book |last=Bonekemper |first=Edward H. III |author-link=Edward H. Bonekemper |year=2010 |title=Ulysses S. Grant: A Victor, Not a Butcher — The Military Genius of the Man Who Won the Civil War |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3Y3mAgAAQBAJ |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-5969-8641-1}}
* {{cite book |last=Brands |first=H. W. |author-link=H. W. Brands |year=2012a |title=The Man Who Saved the Union: Ulysses S. Grant in War and Peace |url=https://archive.org/details/manwhosavedunion0000bran |url-access=registration |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-385-53241-9}}
* {{cite journal |last=Brands |first=H. W. |author-link=H. W. Brands |author-mask=2 |year=2012b |title=Presidents in Crisis: Grant Takes on the Klan |journal=American History |pages=42–47 |issn=1076-8866}}
* {{cite book |last=Bunting |first=Josiah III |author-link=Josiah Bunting III |year=2004 |title=Ulysses S. Grant |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8050-6949-5}}
* {{cite book |last=Calhoun |first=Charles W. |author-link=Charles W. Calhoun |year=2017 |title=The Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant |url=https://archive.org/details/presidencyofulys0000calh |url-access=registration |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-7006-2484-3}} scholarly review and response by Calhoun at {{doi|10.14296/RiH/2014/2270}}
* {{cite book |last=Campbell |first=Edwina S. |year=2016 |title=Citizen of a Wider Commonwealth: Ulysses S. Grant's Postpresidential Diplomacy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aZS-CwAAQBAJ |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8093-3478-0}}
* {{cite book |last=Chernow |first=Ron |author-link=Ron Chernow |year=2017 |title=Grant |url=https://archive.org/details/grant0000cher_x5t4 |url-access=registration |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-59420-487-6}}
* {{cite journal |last=Dorsett |first=Lyle W. |year=1983 |title=The Problem of Ulysses S. Grant's Drinking During the Civil War |journal=Hayes Historical Journal |url=http://www.rbhayes.org/research/hayes-historical-journal-the-problem-of-ulysses-s.-grant/ |volume=IV |issue=2 |pages=37–49}}
* {{cite book |last=Furgurson |first=Ernest B. |year=2007 |orig-year=2000 |title=Not War But Murder: Cold Harbor 1864 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bK9VfkrbmH4C |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-3074-2704-5}}
* {{cite book |last=Garland |first=Hamlin |year=1898 |title=Ulysses S. Grant: His Life and Character |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MnchAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA30 |publisher=Doubleday & McClure |isbn=978-0-7950-1911-1 |ref={{sfnRef|Garland 1898}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Hesseltine |first=William B. |author-link=William B. Hesseltine |year=1957 |orig-year=1935 |title=Ulysses S. Grant: Politician |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=d4wGAQAAIAAJ |publisher=F. Ungar Pub. Co. |isbn=978-1-931313-85-8}}
* {{cite book |last=Howland |first=Edward |year=1868 |title=Grant As a Soldier and Statesman: Being a Succinct History of His Military and Civil Career |url=https://archive.org/details/grantassoldierst00howl/page/n8 |publisher=J. B. Burr and Company}}
* {{cite book |last=Kahan |first=Paul |year=2018 |title=The Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant: Preserving the Civil War's Legacy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=It1BvgAACAAJ |publisher=Westholme Publishing |isbn=978-1-59416-273-2}}
* {{cite book |last=Longacre |first=Edward G. |year=2006 |title=General Ulysses S. Grant: The Soldier and the Man |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=itjvw_xKrhIC |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-306-81636-9}}
* {{cite book |last1=Mackowski |first1=Chris |last2=White |first2=Kristopher D. |year=2015 |title=Grant's Last Battle: The Story Behind the Personal Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_5VICgAAQBAJ |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-61121-160-3}}
* {{cite book |last=McFeely |first=William S. |author-link=William S. McFeely |editor-last=Woodward |editor-first=C. Vann |editor-link=C. Vann Woodward |year=1974 |chapter=War Department and William W. Belknap |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/responsesofpresi00wood/page/132 |chapter-url-access=registration |title=Responses of the Presidents to Charges of Misconduct |url=https://archive.org/details/responsesofpresi00wood |url-access=registration |publisher=] |pages=132–163 |isbn=978-0-440-05923-3}}
* {{cite book |last=McFeely |first=William S. |author-link=William S. McFeely |author-mask=2 |year=1981 |title=Grant: A Biography |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GdpmKTM5zTwC |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-393-01372-6}}
* {{cite book |last=Nevins |first=Allan |author-link=Allan Nevins |year=1929 |title=Dictionary of American Biography Bristow, Benjamin Helm |publisher=] |pages=55–56}}
* {{cite book |last=Patrick |first=Rembert W. |author-link=Rembert W. Patrick |year=1968 |title=The Reconstruction of the Nation |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ph1SAQAAIAAJ |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-19-501016-9}}
* {{cite book |last=Perry |first=Mark |author-link=Mark Perry (author) |year=2004 |title=Grant and Twain: The Story of a Friendship That Changed America |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=d6KqdlzWy2EC |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-679-64273-2}}
* {{cite book |last=Pletcher |first=David M. |year=1998 |title=The Diplomacy of Trade and Investment: American Economic Expansion in the Hemisphere, 1865–1900 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lPIB100VVuoC |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8262-1127-9}}
* {{cite book |last=Pritchard |first=James A. |year=1999 |title=Preserving Yellowstone's Natural Conditions: Science and the Perception of Nature |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YRKmm03VznYC |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8032-3722-3}}
* {{cite book |last=Richter |first=William L. |year=2012 |title=Historical Dictionary of the Civil War and Reconstruction |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iImvlOwSAssC |edition=2nd |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8108-7817-4}}
* {{cite book |last=Schmiel |first=Eugene D. |year=2014 |title=Citizen-General: Jacob Dolson Cox and the Civil War Era |publisher=] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sHjkAgAAQBAJ |isbn=978-0-8214-2082-9}}
* {{cite book |last=Shevitz |first=Amy Hill |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Richard S. |editor-link=Richard S. Levy |year=2005 |chapter=General Orders No. 11 (1862) |title=Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Tdn6FFZklkcC |volume=I |page=256 |publisher=]|isbn=9781851094394 }}
* {{cite journal |last=Simon |first=John Y. |author-link=John Y. Simon |editor-last=Simon |editor-first=John Y. |year=1967 |title=The Papers of Ulysses S. Grant, Volume 01: 1837–1861 |journal=Volumes of the Papers of Ulysses S. Grant |url=https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/usg-volumes/10/ |publisher=]}}
* {{cite journal |last=Simon |first=John Y. |author-link=John Y. Simon |author-mask=2 |year=1969 |title=The Papers of Ulysses S. Grant, Volume 02: April–September 1861 |journal=Volumes of the Papers of Ulysses S. Grant |url=https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/usg-volumes/11/ |publisher=]}}
* {{cite book |last=Simon |first=John Y. |author-link=John Y. Simon |editor-last=Graff |editor-first=Henry |year=2002 |chapter=Ulysses S. Grant |title=The Presidents: A Reference History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uy0oAAAAMAAJ |edition=7th |pages=245–260 |publisher=Scribner |isbn=978-0-684-80551-1}}
* {{cite book |last=Simpson |first=Brooks D. |author-link=Brooks D. Simpson |year=2014 |orig-year=2000 |title=Ulysses S. Grant: Triumph Over Adversity, 1822–1865 |url=https://archive.org/details/ulyssessgranttri00simp |url-access=registration |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-395-65994-6}}
* {{cite book |editor-last=Tucker |editor-first=Spencer C. |editor-link=Spencer C. Tucker |year=2013 |title=The Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War: A Political, Social, and Military History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FZVQcZpic-8C |volume=I |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-85109-853-8 |ref={{sfnRef|Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War 2013}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Smith |first=Jean Edward |author-link=Jean Edward Smith |year=2001 |title=Grant |url=https://archive.org/details/grant00smit |url-access=registration |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-684-84927-0}}
* {{cite book |last=Sproat |first=John G. |editor-last=Woodward |editor-first=C. Vann |editor-link=C. Vann Woodward |year=1974 |title=Responses of the Presidents to Charges of Misconduct |publisher=] |pages=163–176 |isbn=978-0-440-05923-3}}
* {{cite journal |last=Taylor |first=M. Scott |author-link=M. Scott Taylor |year=2011 |title=Buffalo Hunt: International Trade and the Virtual Extinction of the North American Bison |journal=The American Economic Review |url=http://www.nber.org/papers/w12969.pdf |volume=101 |issue=7 |pages=3162–3195 |jstor=41408734 |doi=10.1257/aer.101.7.3162 |s2cid=154413490}}
* {{cite journal |last=Waltmann |first=Henry G. |year=1971 |title=Circumstantial Reformer: President Grant & the Indian Problem |journal=Arizona and the West |volume=13 |issue=4 |pages=323–342 |jstor=40168089}}
* {{cite book |last=Wang |first=Xi |year=1997 |title=The Trial of Democracy: Black Suffrage and Northern Republicans, 1860–1910 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5Rn8AAAAQBAJ |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8203-4206-1}}
* {{cite book |last=Ward |first=Geoffrey C. |author-link=Geoffrey C. Ward |year=2012 |title=A Disposition to Be Rich: How a Small-Town Pastor's Son Ruined an American President, Brought on a Wall Street Crash, and Made Himself the Best-Hated Man in the United States |url=https://archive.org/details/dispositiontober0000ward |url-access=registration |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-679-44530-2}}
* {{cite book |last=Waugh |first=Joan |author-link=Joan Waugh |year=2009 |title=U. S. Grant: American Hero, American Myth |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AnH6-AlKACUC |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-8078-3317-9}}
* {{cite journal |last=Weinstein |first=Allen |author-link=Allen Weinstein |year=1967 |title=Was There a 'Crime of 1873'?: The Case of the Demonetized Dollar |journal=Journal of American History |volume=54 |issue=2 |pages=307–326 |jstor=1894808 |doi=10.2307/1894808}}
* {{cite book |last=White |first=Ronald C. |author-link=Ronald C. White |year=2016 |title=American Ulysses: A Life of Ulysses S. Grant |url=https://archive.org/details/americanulyssesl0000whit_f8c1 |url-access=registration |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-58836-992-5}}
* {{cite journal |last=Woodward |first=C. Vann |author-link=C. Vann Woodward |year=1957 |title=The Lowest Ebb |url=https://www.americanheritage.com/content/lowest-ebb |journal=American Heritage |volume=8 |number=3 |pages=53–108 |issn=0002-8738}}
{{refend}}


===Biographical and political=== ===Military and politics===
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book |last=Badeau |first=Adam |authorlink=Adam Badeau |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=aG1LAAAAYAAJ& |title=Grant in Peace: From Appomattox to Mount McGregor |publisher=D.Appleton |location=New York |year=1887 |ref={{sfnRef|Badeau 1887}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Brands |first=H. W. |authorlink=H.W. Brands|title=The Man Who Saved The Union Ulysses S. Grant in War and Peace |publisher=Doubleday |location=New York|year=2012|ref={{sfnRef|Brands 2012a}}}} * {{cite book|last=Axelrod|first=Alan|url=https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=M-l6buinWv8C|title=Generals South Generals North The Commanders of the Civil War Reconsidered|publisher=Lyons Press|date=2011|format=ebook|isbn=978-0-7627-8849-1}}
* {{cite journal |last=Brands |first=H. W. |title=Presidents in Crisis Grant: Takes on the Klan |journal=American History |pages=42–47|month=December |year=2012 |ref={{sfnRef|Brands 2012b}}}} * {{cite book |last=Barney |first=William L. |title=The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Civil War |publisher=Oxford University Press, Inc |year=2011 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5b4qd_NKXicC |isbn=978-0-19-978201-7 }}
* {{cite book|last1=Burdekin|first1=Richard C.K.|last2=Siklos|first2=Pierre L.|title=Routledge Handbook of Major Events in Economic History|chapter=Gold Resumption and the Deflation of the 1870s|editor=Randall E. Parker|editor2=Robert M. Whaples|publisher=Routledge|year=2013|isbn=978-0-415-67703-5|ssrn=2030878|chapter-url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780203067871/chapters/10.4324/9780203067871-12|doi=10.4324/9780203067871}}
* {{cite book |last=Bunting III |first=Josiah |title=Ulysses S. Grant |location= New York |publisher=Times Books|year=2004 |ISBN=0-8050-6949-6 |ref={{sfnRef|Bunting}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Bonekemper |first=Edward H. III |title=Grant and Lee: Victorious American and Vanquished Virginian |publisher=Regnery History |year=2012 |isbn=978-1-62157-010-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JKZmLgEACAAJ }}
* {{cite journal |last=Cox |first=Jacob Dolson |title=How Judge Hoar Ceased to be Attorney General |authorlink=Jacob Dolson Cox|journal=Atlantic Monthly Making of America |publisher=Cornell University Library |url=http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/pageviewer?frames=1&cite=&coll=moa&view=50&root=%2Fmoa%2Fatla%2Fatla0076%2F&tif=00171.TIF&pagenum=162 |volume=76 |issue=454 |year=1895 |month=July |pages=162–173 |ref={{sfnRef|Cox}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Carpenter |first=Daniel P. |title=The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928 |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-691-07009-4 |oclc=47120319 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_yvIAoYV--UC&q=Grant+signs+the+Comstock+Act&pg=PA84 |access-date=April 1, 2010 |pages=84–85 |chapter=Chapter Three }}
* {{cite book |last=Dunning |first=William |title=Reconstruction Political and Economic 1865–1877 |year=1905 |volume=22 |url=http://www.archive.org/details/americannation22hartrich |ref={{sfnRef|Dunning}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Catton |first=Bruce |author-link=Bruce Catton |title=Grant Takes Command |publisher=Little, Brown |year=1968 |isbn=978-0316132107 |url=https://archive.org/details/granttakescomman0000bruc |url-access=registration }}
* {{cite book| authorlink=Hamlin Garland|last=Garland |first=Hamlin |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=AEIOAAAAIAAJ& |title=Ulysses S. Grant: His Life and Character |location=New York |publisher=Doubleday & McClure Co |year=1898 |ref={{sfnRef|Garland}}}}
* {{cite journal |last=Hardy |first=William E. |title=South of the Border: Ulysses S. Grant and the French Intervention |journal=Civil War History |volume=54 |issue=1 |year=2008 |pages=63+ |url=http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5026686310 |ref={{sfnRef|Hardy}}}} * {{cite book |last=Catton |first=Bruce |author-mask=2 |title=The Civil War |publisher=American Heritage |year=2005 |orig-year=1960 |isbn=978-0-618-00187-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lSOwSO5l5OUC }}
* {{cite book |last=Coffey |first=David |title=The Encyclopedia of North American Indian Wars, 1607–1890: A Political, Social, and Military History |publisher=ABC-CLIO|editor=] |volume=1 |year=2011 |isbn=978-1-85109-697-8}}
* {{cite book |last=Hesseltine |first= William B. |ref={{sfnRef|Hesseltine}} |title=Ulysses S. Grant: Politician |url=http://www.questia.com/library/book/ulysses-s-grant-politician-by-william-b-hesseltine.jsp |location=New York, New York |publisher=F. Ungar Pub. Co. |year=1957 |origyear=1935 |isbn= 1-931313-85-7}}
* {{cite web |last=Cullum |first=George W. |title=Biographical Register of the Officers and Graduates of the U.S. Military Academy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rB1XAAAAcAAJ&q=brevet |publisher=Houghton Mifflin And Company |year=1850 }}
* {{cite book |ref={{sfnRef|Kohn}} |last=Kohn |first=George C. |title=The New Encyclopedia of American Scandal |publisher=Facts On File, Inc. |location=] |date=2000 |isbn=0-8160-4420-1}}
* {{cite book |last=Cullum |first=George W. |title=Biographical Register of the Officers and Graduates of the U.S. Military Academy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=f384AAAAYAAJ&q=%22july+1%22 |volume=2 |publisher=Houghton Mifflin And Company |year=1891 |isbn=978-0-608-42862-8 }}
* {{cite journal|last=Kreiser |first=Christine |year=2013 |title=Royal Visit |journal=American History |volume=47 |issue=6 |page=19 |ref={{sfnRef|Kreiser}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Longacre |first=Edward G. |title=General Ulysses S. Grant The Soldier And The Man |publisher=First De Capo Press |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |year=2006 |isbn=0-306-81269-X |ref={{sfnRef|Longacre}}}} * {{cite book |last=Donovan |first=James |title=A Terrible Glory: Custer and the Little Bighorn – The Last Great Battle of the American West |publisher=Little, Brown |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-316-06747-8 |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780316155786 |url-access=registration }}
* {{cite journal |last=Ertman |first=M. M. |title=Race Treason: The Untold Story of America's Ban on Polygamy |url=https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1605&context=fac_pubs |year=2010 |journal=] |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=287–366}}
* {{cite book |last=Mantell |first=Martin E. |url=http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=89815306 |title=Johnson, Grant, and the Politics of Reconstruction |location=New York |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=1973}}
* {{cite book |ref={{sfnRef|Martinez}} |last = Martinez | first = James Michael | title = Carpetbaggers, Cavalry, and the Ku Klux Klan: Exposing the Invisible Empire During Reconstruction | publisher = Rowman & Littlefield | year=2007 | isbn = 978-0742550780}} * {{cite book |last=Farina |first=William |title=Ulysses S. Grant, 1861–1864: His Rise from Obscurity to Military Greatness |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LiXipzGjMxsC |publisher=McFarland & Co |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-7864-2977-6 }}
* {{cite book |ref={{sfnRef|McFeely 1981}} |last=McFeely |first=William S. |authorlink=William S. McFeely |title=Grant: A Biography |publisher= Norton |year=1981 |isbn= 0-393-01372-3}}; Pulitzer Prize * {{cite book |last=Flood |first=Charles Bracelen |title=Grant and Sherman: The Friendship That Won the Civil War |publisher=Harper Perennial |isbn=978-0-06-114871-2 |year=2005 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Hf3al_EYEPkC }}
* {{cite book |ref={{sfnRef|McFeely 1974}} |last=McFeely |first=William S. |editor1-last=Woodward |editor1-first=C. Vann |title=Responses of the Presidents to Charges of Misconduct |publisher=Delacorte Press |location=New York, New York |year=1974 |isbn=0-440-05923-2 }} * {{cite book |last=Foner |first=Eric |author-link=Eric Foner |title=Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution 1863–1877 Updated Version |publisher=Harper Perennial |year=2014 |isbn=978-0062354518 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FhvA0S_op38C }}
* {{cite book|author-link=Eric Foner|last=Foner|first=Eric|author-mask=2|title=The Second Founding: How the Civil War and Reconstruction Remade the Constitution|date=2019|publisher=W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.|isbn=978-0393358520 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W_yKDwAAQBAJ}}
* {{cite book |last=Nevins |first=Allan |authorlink=Allan Nevins |url=http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=94934148 |title=Hamilton Fish: The Inner History of the Grant Administration |location=New York |publisher=Dodd, Mead |year=1936 |volume=2 |ref={{sfnRef|Nevins}}}}
* {{cite book |ref={{sfnRef|Patrick}} |last=Patrick |first=Rembert W. |title=The Reconstruction of the Nation |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=] |year=1968}} * {{cite book |last=Franklin |first=John Hope |title=The Enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1875 |publisher=Prologue |year=1974 |url=http://studylib.net/doc/8205613/the-enforcement-of-the-civil-rights-act-of-1875 }}
* {{cite book |last=Perry |first=Mark |authorlink=Mark Perry (author) |title=Grant and Twain|publisher=Random House |location=New York |year=2004 |ref={{sfnRef|Perry}}}} * {{cite book |last=Goethals |first=George R. |title=Presidential Leadership and African Americans |publisher=Routledge |year=2015 |isbn=978-1-138-81424-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aPyTBwAAQBAJ }}
* {{cite book |last=Rable |first=George C. |title=But There Was No Peace: The Role of Violence in the Politics of Reconstruction |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=8qn37CH-i9IC& |year=2007 |publisher=University of Georgia Press |location= Athens, Georgia |ref={{sfnRef|Rable}}}} * {{cite book |last=Groom |first=Winston |title=Shiloh 1862 |publisher=National Geographic Society |year=2012 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7_9IKUH3OXgC |isbn=978-1-4262-0879-9 }}
* {{cite book |last=Lewis |first=Lloyd |title=Captain Sam Grant |publisher=Little, Brown |year=1950 |isbn=978-0-316-52348-6 |url=https://archive.org/details/captainsamgrant00lewi_0 |url-access=registration }}
* {{cite journal |title=The oral tumours of two American presidents: what if they were alive today?|last1=Renehan |first1=A |last2=Lowry |first2=J C |journal=J R Soc Med.|year=1995|month=July|volume=88|issue=7|pmc=1295266|pmid=7562805|pages=377–383|ref={{sfnRef|Renehan & Lowry}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Kohn |first=George C. |title=The New Encyclopedia of American Scandal |publisher=Facts on File, Inc. |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-8160-4420-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uzdWTBytwAIC }}
* {{cite book |last=Rhodes |first=James Ford |url=http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=24644891 |title=History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850 to the McKinley-Bryan Campaign of 1896 |volume=6 & 7 |year=1920|ref={{sfnRef|Rhodes}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Sarna |first=Jonathan |authorlink=Jonathan Sarna |year=2012 |title=When General Grant Expelled the Jews |location=New York |publisher=Nextbook Press |isbn=978-0-8052-4279-9 |url=http://nextbookpress.com/books/248/when-grant-expelled-the-jews/|ref={{sfnRef|Sarna}}}} * {{cite book |last=Miller |first=Donald L. |title=Vicksburg: Grant's Campaign That Broke the Confederacy |publisher=Simon and Schuster |year=2019 |isbn=978-1-4516-4137-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wxyzDwAAQBAJ }}
* {{cite news |title=The Mormon Trials |url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1871/11/22/79004116.pdf |newspaper=]| date=November 22, 1871 |via=TimesMachine |ref={{sfnRef|''The New York Times''|1871}} }}
* {{cite book |last=Scaturro |first=Frank J. |title=President Grant Reconsidered |location=Lanham, Maryland |publisher=University Press of America |year=1998 |ref={{sfnRef|Scaturro}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Nevins |first=Allan |author-link=Allan Nevins |title=Hamilton Fish: The Inner History of the Grant Administration |publisher=Dodd, Mead |year=1936 |volume=2 |asin=B00085BDXU |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Wvl2AAAAMAAJ }}
* {{cite book |last=Simpson |first=Brooks D. |authorlink=Brooks D. Simpson |title=Let Us Have Peace: Ulysses S. Grant and the Politics of War and Reconstruction, 1861–1868 |location=Chapel Hill, North Carolina |publisher=University of North Carolina Press |year=1991 |ref={{sfnRef|Simpson 1991}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Simpson |first=Brooks D. |title=The Reconstruction Presidents |location= Lawrence, Kansas |publisher=University Press of Kansas |ref={{sfnRef|Simpson 1998}}}} * {{cite book |last=Sarna |first=Jonathan D. |author-link=Jonathan Sarna |title=When General Grant Expelled the Jews |publisher=Schocken Books |year=2012a |isbn=978-0-8052-4279-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U0GLlNrxhlQC }}
* {{cite magazine |last=Sarna |first=Jonathan D. |author-mask=2 |title=When Gen. Grant Expelled the Jews |magazine=Slate |url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history/2012/03/ulysses_s_grant_and_general_orders_no_11_how_the_infamous_order_changed_the_lives_of_jews_in_america_.html |date=March 13, 2012b }}
* {{cite book |last=Simpson |first=Brooks D. |title=Ulysses S. Grant: Triumph Over Adversity, 1822–1865 |url=http://books.google.com/?id=LiXipzGjMxsC& |publisher=Houghton Mifflin |location=Boston, Massachusetts |year=2000 |isbn=0-395-65994-9 |ref={{sfnRef|Simpson 2000}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Scher |first=Richard K. |title=Politics in the New South: Republicanism, Race and Leadership in the Twentieth Century |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c8KlDQAAQBAJ |year=2015 |orig-year=1997 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-56324-848-1 }}
* {{cite book |last=Simon |first=John Y. |authorlink=John Y. Simon |chapter=Ulysses S. Grant |editor-last=Graff |editor-first=Henry |title=The Presidents: A Reference History |edition=7th |year=2002 |pages=245–260 |ref={{sfnRef|Simon 2002}}}}
* {{cite journal |last=Simpson |first=Brooks D. | author-link = Brooks D. Simpson |title=Grant's Tour of the South Revisited |journal=The Journal of Southern History |volume=54 |number=3 |year=1988 |pages=425–448 |publisher=JSTOR |doi=10.2307/2208997 |jstor=2208997 |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2208997 |access-date=August 16, 2020 }}
* {{cite book |last=Smith |first=Jean Edward | authorlink=Jean Edward Smith|title=Grant |publisher=Simon & Schuster |location=New York|year=2001 |isbn=0-684-84927-5 |ref={{sfnRef|Smith}}}}
* {{cite journal |last=Waltmann |first=Henry G. |title=Circumstantial Reformer: President Grant & the Indian Problem |journal=Arizona and the West |volume=13 |issue=4 |month=Winter |year=1971 |pages=323–342 |jstor=40168089 |ref={{sfnRef|Waltmann}}}} * {{cite book |last=Utter |first=Glenn H. |title=Guns and Contemporary Society: The Past, Present, and Future of Firearms and Firearm Policy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pjgVCwAAQBAJ |year=2015 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-4408-3218-5}}
* {{cite book |last=Waugh |first=Joan |title=U.S. Grant: American Hero, American Myth |publisher=The University of North Carolina Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-8078-3317-9 |ref={{sfnRef|Waugh}}}} * {{cite book |last=Venable |first=Shannon |title=Gold: A Cultural Encyclopedia |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TBGzEK4laJ0C&pg=PA66 |year=2011 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-0-313-38430-1 }}
* {{cite book |last=Wheelan |first=Joseph |title=Bloody Spring: Forty Days that Sealed the Confederacy's Fate |publisher=Da Capo Press |year=2014 |isbn=978-0-306-82206-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sOFzAgAAQBAJ }}
* {{cite journal |last=Woodward |first=C. Vann |authorlink=C. Vann Woodward |title=The Lowest Ebb |url=http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/1957/3/1957_3_52.shtml |magazine=American Heritage |volume = 8 |number = 3 |year= 1957 |month = April |pages= 53–108 |ref={{sfnRef|Woodward}}}}
{{refend}}


===Military=== ===Historiography===
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book |last=Badeau |first=Adam |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=JeUDAAAAYAAJ& |title= Military History of Ulysses S. Grant, from April 1861, to April 1865 |location=New York |publisher=D. Appleton |year=1881|ref={{sfnRef|Badeau 1881}}}}
* {{cite journal |last=Bonekemper |first=Edward H. III |title=The Butcher's Bill: Ulysses S. Grant Is Often Referred to as a 'Butcher,' But Does Robert E. Lee Actually Deserve That Title? |journal=Civil War Times |volume=52 |issue=1 |pages=36–43 |oclc=67618265 |date=April 2011 |url=https://www.historynet.com/the-butchers-bill.htm }}
* {{cite book |last=Ballard |first=Michael B. |title=Grant at Vicksburg: The General and the Siege |publisher=Southern Illinois University Press |year=2013|ref={{sfnRef|Ballard}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Bearss |first=Edwin C. |authorlink=Ed Bearss |title=The Vicksburg Campaign |location=Dayton, Ohio |publisher=Morningside |year=1991 |isbn=0-89029-308-2|ref={{sfnRef|Bearss}}}} * {{cite book|last=Diller|first=Daniel C.|title=Guide to the Presidency|editor=Michael Nelson|publisher=Routledge|year=1996|isbn=978-1-56802-018-1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oa_lCAAAQBAJ}}
* {{cite news |last=Hunt |first=Linda Lawrence |title='American Ulysses' writer Ronald C. White explains why Grant is so often misunderstood |url=https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2017/0727/American-Ulysses-writer-Ronald-C.-White-explains-why-Grant-is-so-often-misunderstood |work=] |date=July 27, 2017 }}
* {{cite book |last=Catton |first=Bruce |authorlink=Bruce Catton |title=U.S. Grant and the American Military Tradition |location=Boston |publisher=Little, Brown |year=1954 |ref={{sfnRef|Catton 1954}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Catton |first=Bruce |title=Grant Moves South |location=Boston |publisher=Little, Brown |year=1960 |isbn=0-316-13207-1|ref={{sfnRef|Catton 1960}}}} * {{cite book |last=Jones |first=Terry L. |year=2011 |title=Historical Dictionary of the Civil War |volume=1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ET6CDfczq9gC&pg=PA1580 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |isbn=978-0-8108-7953-9 }}
* {{cite book |last=Catton |first=Bruce |title=Grant Takes Command |location=Boston |publisher=Little, Brown |year=1968 |isbn=0-316-13210-1|ref={{sfnRef|Catton 1968}}}} * {{cite journal |last=Kaplan |first=Mike |date=October 2015 |title=Grant's Drinking or... The Beast That Will Not Die |journal=Journal of Military History |volume=79 |issue=4 |pages=1109–1119 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Price |first1=Kay |last2=Hendricks |first2=Marian |title=Galena |year=2007 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UisiV29nrSgC |publisher=Arcadia Publishing |isbn=978-0-7385-5114-2 }}
* {{cite book| ref={{sfnRef|Donovan}}|last=Donovan |first=James |title=A Terrible Glory Custer and the Little Bighorn --- The Last Great Battle of the American West |publisher=Back Ray Books |location=] |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-316-06747-8}}
* {{cite book |last=Farina |first=William |title=Ulysses S. Grant, 1861–1864: His Rise from Obscurity to Military Greatness |url=http://books.google.com/?id=LiXipzGjMxsC& |location=Jefferson, North Carolina |publisher=McFarland & Co |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-7864-2977-6 |ref={{sfnRef|Farina}}}} * {{cite journal |last=Rafuse |first=Ethan S. |title=Still a Mystery? General Grant and the Historians, 1981–2006 |journal=Journal of Military History |date=July 2007 |volume=71 |issue=3 |pages=849–874 |doi=10.1353/jmh.2007.0230 |s2cid=159901226}}
* {{cite book |last=Fuller |first=Maj. Gen. J. F. C. |authorlink=J. F. C. Fuller |title=Grant and Lee, a Study in Personality and Generalship |location=Bloomington, Indiana |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=1957 |isbn= 0-253-13400-5 |ref={{sfnRef|Fuller}}}} * {{cite journal |last= Russell | first=Henry M. W. |title=The Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant: The Rhetoric of Judgment |journal=Virginia Quarterly Review |date=Spring 1990 |volume=66 |issue=2 |pages=189–209 |issn=0042-675X}}
* {{cite book |last=Korda |first=Michael |title=Ulysses S. Grant: The Unlikely Hero |location=New York |publisher=Atlas Books/HarperCollins |year=2004 |ref={{sfnRef|Korda}}}} * {{cite news |last=Stiles |first=T.J. |author-link=T. J. Stiles |date=October 19, 2016 |title=Ulysses S. Grant: New Biography of 'A Nobody From Nowhere' |work=] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/23/books/review/american-ulysses-ronald-c-white.html?_r=0 }}
* {{cite web | title = General Ulysses S. Grant Memorial, (sculpture) | work = Collections Search Center | publisher = Smithsonian Institution | date = 2014 | url = http://collections.si.edu/search/results.htm?q=record_ID:siris_ari_22185 | ref = memorial }}
* {{cite book |last=Korn |first=Bertram W. |title=American Jewry and the Civil War |location=New York |publisher=Jewish Publication Society of America |year=1951 |ref={{sfnRef|Korn}}}}
* {{cite web|last=Farley|first=Robert|title=Why too many historians look down on Ulysses S. Grant|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/why-too-many-historians-look-down-on-ulysses-s-grant-2021-9|date=September 20, 2021|website=]|access-date=September 23, 2021|ref={{sfnRef|Farley 2021}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Lewis |first=Lloyd |title=Captain Sam Grant |location=Boston |publisher=Little, Brown |year=1950 |isbn=0-316-52348-8 |ref={{sfnRef|Lewis}}}}
* {{cite web|title=Biographies of the Secretaries of State: Hamilton Fish (1808–1893)|url=https://history.state.gov/departmenthistory/people/fish-hamilton|website=Department of State|access-date=February 18, 2022|ref={{sfnRef|Hamilton Fish (1808–1893)}}}}
* {{cite book |last=McWhiney |first=Grady |title=Battle in the Wilderness: Grant Meets Lee |location=Fort Worth, Texas |publisher=Ryan Place Publishers |year=1995|ref={{sfnRef|McWhitney}}}}
* {{cite web|last=Martinez|first=J. Michael|title=Scoundrels: Political Scandals in American History—Scandals of the 1870s|url=https://www.jmichaelmartinez.com/post/scoundrels-political-scandals-in-american-history-scandals-of-the-1870s|date=March 15, 2021|access-date=February 27, 2022|ref={{sfnRef|Martinez (March 15, 2021)}}}}
* {{cite book |last=McDonough |first=James Lee |title=Shiloh: In Hell Before Night |location=Knoxville, Tennessee |publisher=University of Tennessee Press |year=1977 |ref={{sfnRef|McDonough 1977}}}}
{{refend}}
* {{cite book |last=McDonough |first=James Lee |title=Chattanooga: A Death Grip on the Confederacy|location=Knoxville, Tennessee |publisher=University of Tennessee Press |year=1984|ref={{sfnRef|McDonough 1984}}}}
* {{cite book |last=McPherson |first=James M. |authorlink=James M. McPherson |title=Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era |location=New York |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1988 |isbn=0-19-503863-0 |ref={{sfnRef|McPherson}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Maney |first=R. Wayne |title=Marching to Cold Harbor. Victory and Failure, 1864 |location=Shippensburg, Pennsylvania |publisher=White Mane Pub. Co. |year=1994 |ref={{sfnRef|Maney}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Matter |first=William D. |title=If It Takes All Summer: The Battle of Spotsylvania |location=Chapel Hill, North Carolina |publisher=University of North Carolina Press |year=1988 |ref={{sfnRef|Matter}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Miers |first=Earl Schenck |title=The Web of Victory: Grant at Vicksburg |location=New York |publisher=Knopf |year=1955 |ref={{sfnRef|Miers}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Mosier |first=John |title=Grant |location=New York |publisher=Palgrave MacMillan |year=2006 |isbn=1-4039-7136-6 |ref={{sfnRef|Mosier}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Rhea |first=Gordon C. |title=The Battle of the Wilderness May 5–6, 1864 |publisher=Louisiana State University Press |year=1994 |isbn=0-8071-1873-7}}
* {{cite book |last=Rhea |first=Gordon C. |title=The Battles for Spotsylvania Court House and the Road to Yellow Tavern May 7–12, 1864 |publisher=Louisiana State University Press |year=1997 |isbn=0-8071-2136-3}}
* {{cite book |last=Rhea |first=Gordon C. |title=To the North Anna River: Grant and Lee, May 13–25, 1864 |publisher=Louisiana State University Press |year=2000 |isbn=0-8071-2535-0}}
* {{cite book |last=Rhea |first=Gordon C. |title=Cold Harbor: Grant and Lee, May 26&nbsp;– June 3, 1864 |publisher=Louisiana State University Press |year=2002 |isbn=0-8071-2803-1}}
* {{cite journal |last=Schenker |first=Carl R. |title=Ulysses in His Tent: Halleck, Grant, Sherman, and 'The Turning Point of the War' |journal=Civil War History |month=June |year=2010 |volume=56 |issue=2}}
* {{cite book |last=Simpson |first=Brooks D. |title=After Shiloh: Grant, Sherman, and Survival |location=Carbondale, Illinois |publisher=Southern Illinois University Press |year=2009}}
* {{cite book |last=Steere |first=Edward |title=The Wilderness Campaign |location=Harrisburg, Pennsylvania |publisher=Stackpole Co. |year=1960}}
* {{cite book |last=Williams |first=Kenneth P. |title=Lincoln Finds a General: A Military Study of the Civil War |location=New York |publisher=Macmillan |year=1959 |volume=5}}
* {{cite book |last=Williams |first=T. Harry |authorlink=T. Harry Williams |title=McClellan, Sherman and Grant |location=New Brunswick, New Jersey |publisher=Rutgers University Press |year=1962}}
* {{cite book |last=Woodworth |first=Steven E. |title=Nothing but Victory: The Army of the Tennessee, 1861&nbsp;– 1865 |location=New York |publisher=Alfred A. Knopf |year=2005 |isbn=0-375-41218-2}}


===Primary sources=== ==Further reading==
{{main|Bibliography of Ulysses S. Grant}}
* {{cite book |ref=Simon (1967) |last=Simon |first=John Y. |title=The Papers of Ulysses S. Grant |year=1967–2012, 32 vol. |publisher=Southern Illinois University Press}}
* {{cite book |last=Grant |first=Ulysses S. |url=http://www.bartleby.com/1011/ |title=Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant] |publisher=C.L. Webster & Co. |year=1885}}
** {{cite book |last=Wilson |first=Edmund |title=Patriotic Gore: Studies in the Literature of the American Civil War |location=New York |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1962 |pages=131–173}} for commentary
* {{cite book |last=Grant |first=Ulysses S. |title=Memoirs and Selected Letters |editor1-first=Mary Drake |editor1-last=McFeely |editor2-first=William S. |editor2-last=McFeely |publisher=The Library of America |year=1990 |isbn=978-0-940450-58-5}}
* {{cite book |last=Porter |first=Horace |title=Campaigning with Grant |location=Alexandria, Virginia |publisher=Time-Life Books |year=1897}}


===Historiography=== ===Articles===
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book |ref={{sfnRef|Bonekemper 2004}} |last=Bonekemper III |first=Edward H. |title=A Victor, Not a Butcher: Ulysses S. Grant's Overlooked Military Genius |location=] |publisher=Regnery |year=2004 |isbn= 0-89526-062-X}}
* {{cite journal |ref={{sfnRef|Bonekemper 2011}} |last=Bonekemper III |first=Edward H. |title=The butcher's bill: Ulysses S. Grant is often referred to as a 'butcher,' but does Robert E. Lee actually deserve that title? |journal=Civil War Times |volume=52 |issue=1 |pages=36–43 |date=April 2011}} * {{cite journal|last=Bell|first=Robert A.|title=The Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868 and the Sioux: Is the United States Honoring the Agreements it Made?|journal=Indigenous Policy Journal|volume=XXVIII|number=3|date=2018|url=https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=42&page=transcript}}
* {{cite journal |last=Ferraro|first=William M. |title=Old and New Views of Ulysses S. Grant: The Soldier and The Man|journal=Journal of Military History|volume=83|issue=1 |pages=195–212|date=January 2019}}
* {{cite news |ref={{sfnRef|Foner 2012}}|last=Foner |first=Eric |authorlink=Eric Foner |date=November 2, 2012 |title="The Man Who Saved the Union: Ulysses Grant in War and Peace" by H. W. Brands (book review) |url=http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-11-02/opinions/35505074_1_brands-historians-centuries-and-genres |newspaper=The Washington Post }}
* {{cite news|last=Foner|first=Eric|title=Why Reconstruction Matters|newspaper=] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/29/opinion/sunday/why-reconstruction-matters.html|date=March 28, 2015}}
* {{cite book|first1=Robert K. |last1=Murray |first2=Tim H. |last2=Blessing|title=Greatness in White House|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=uPe7YMR4g1AC&|year=2004|publisher=Pennsylvania State University Press|ref={{sfnRef|Murray & Blessing}}}}
* {{cite news |last=Foner |first=Eric |author-mask=2 |title=Ulysses S. Grant Died 130 Years Ago. Racists Hate Him, But Historians No Longer Do. |work=] |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ulysses-s-grant-died-130-years-ago-today-racists-hated-him-but-historians-no-longer-do_us_55afe547e4b0a9b948535f6e |date=July 23, 2015 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |ref={{sfnRef|Paxson & Bach}} |year=1931 |title =Ulysses S. Grant |encyclopedia=] |last1=Paxson |first1=Frederic Logan |last2=Bach |first2=Christian A. |volume=VII |pages=492–501 |publisher=C. Scribner's Sons |location=New York |url=https://archive.org/stream/dictionaryofamer07ilamer#page/492/mode/2up}}
* {{cite journal| last=Rafuse |first=Ethan S. |title=Still a Mystery? General Grant and the Historians, 1981–2006 |journal=Journal of Military History |month=July |year=2007 |volume=71 |issue=3 |pages=849–74 |url=http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/jmh/summary/v071/71.3rafuse.html}} * {{cite journal |last=Kaczorowski |first=Robert J. |title=Federal Enforcement of Civil Rights During the First Reconstruction |url=http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1591&context=ulj |year=1995 |journal=Fordham Urban Law Journal |volume=23 |issue=1 |pages=155–186 |issn=2163-5978 }}
* {{cite magazine |last=King |first=Gilbert |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/war-and-peace-of-mind-for-ulysses-s-grant-1882227/ |title=War and Peace of Mind for Ulysses S. Grant |date=January 16, 2013 |magazine=]}}
* {{cite journal| first=Henry M. W. |last= Russell |title=The memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant: The rhetoric of judgment |journal= Virginia Quarterly Review |month=Spring |year=1990 |volume=66 |issue=2 |pages=189–209 |ref={{sfnRef|Russell}}}}
* {{cite magazine |last=Roza |first=Matthew |url=https://www.salon.com/2022/12/24/the-true-story-of-the-couldnt-hear-music/ |title=The true story of the president who couldn't hear music |date=December 24, 2022 |magazine=]}}
* {{cite journal |ref={{sfnRef|Simon 1982}} |last=Simon |first=John Y |authorlink=John Y. Simon |year=1982 |month=Spring |title=Grant: A Biography by William S. McFeely (book review) |journal=The Wisconsin Magazine of History |volume=65 |issue=3 |pages=220–221 |jstor=4635640 }}
* {{cite journal |last=Simon |first=John Y. |author-link=John Y. Simon |year=1965 |title=From Galena to Appomattox: Grant and Washburne |jstor=i40006018 |journal=Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society |volume=58 |number=2|pages=165–189 }}
* {{cite book |last=Simpson |first=Brooks D. |chapter=Continuous Hammering and Mere Attrition: Lost Cause Critics and the Military Reputation of Ulysses S. Grant |title=The Myth of the Lost Cause and Civil War History |editor1-first=Gary W. |editor1-last=Gallagher |editor2-first=Alan T. |editor2-last=Nolan |location=Bloomington, Indiana |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=2000 |isbn=0-253-33822-0}}
* {{cite magazine |last=Solly |first=Meilan |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/when-president-ulysses-s-grant-was-arrested-for-speeding-in-a-horse-drawn-carriage-180981916/ |title=When President Ulysses S. Grant Was Arrested for Speeding in a Horse-Drawn Carriage |date=March 31, 2023 |magazine=] }}
* {{cite journal |last=Skidmore, |first=Max J. |title=The Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant: A Reconsideration |journal=White House Studies |month=February |year=2005 |volume=5 |issue=2 |pages=255–270}}
* {{cite magazine |last=Stockwell |first=Mary |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ulysses-grants-failed-attempt-to-grant-native-americans-citizenship-180971198/ |title=Ulysses Grant's Failed Attempt to Grant Native Americans Citizenship |date=January 9, 2019 |magazine=]}}
* {{cite book |first=Edmund |last=Wilson |title=Patriotic Gore: Studies in the Literature of the American Civil War |year=1962 |ref={{sfnRef|Wilson}}}}
* {{cite magazine |last=Waugh |first=Joan |url=https://www.salon.com/2011/05/01/joan_waugh_grant/ |title=How the "Lost Cause" poisoned our history books: Ulysses S. Grant championed civil rights in the South during Reconstruction — and he's still paying dearly for it |date=May 1, 2011 |magazine=]}}
* {{cite journal |ref={{sfnRef|Weigley}} |last=Weigley |first=Russell F. |authorlink=Russell Weigley |year=2001 |month=October |title=Grant by Jean Edward Smith (book review) |journal=The Journal of Military History |volume=65 |issue=4 |pages=1104–1105 |jstor=2677657 }}
{{refend}}
* {{cite news |ref=Wilentz |last=Wilentz |first=Sean |title=Who's Buried in the History Books? |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/opinion/14wilentz.html |newspaper=]|date=March 14, 2010 |accessdate=11-04-2011}}

===Books===
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book |last=Bordewich |first=Fergus |author-link=Fergus Bordewich |title=Klan War: Ulysses S. Grant and the Battle to Save Reconstruction |publisher=] |year=2023 |isbn=978-0-593-31782-2}}
* {{cite book |last=Catton |first=Bruce |author-link=Bruce Catton |title=A Stillness at Appomattox |publisher=] |year=1953 |url=https://archive.org/details/stillnessatappom00cattrich/mode/2up |url-access=registration}}
* {{cite book |last=Grant |first=Ulysses S. |year=1885 |title=Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant |url=https://archive.org/details/personalmemoirso01ingran |volume=I |publisher=]}}
* {{cite book |last=Grant |first=Ulysses S. |author-mask=2 |year=1885 |title=Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant |url=https://archive.org/details/personalmemoirso02ingran |volume=II |publisher=Charles L. Webster and Company}}
* {{cite book |last1=Poore |first1=Benjamin Perley |last2=Tiffany |first2=O. H. |year=1885 |title=Life of U. S. Grant |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3V8fAQAAMAAJ |publisher=Hubbard Bros. |isbn=978-0795018916}}
* {{cite book |last=Porter |first=Lorle |title=Politics & Peril: Mount Vernon, Ohio in the Nineteenth Century |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MBS-WO5oYiQC |publisher=New Concord Press |year=2005 |isbn=978-1-887932-25-7 }}
* {{cite book |last=Reeves |first=John |title=Soldier of Destiny: Slavery, Secession, and the Redemption of Ulysses S. Grant |publisher=] |year=2023 |isbn=978-1-63936-528-9}} Focus on 1860–1861.
* {{cite book |last=Simpson |first=Brooks D. |author-link=Brooks D. Simpson |title=Let Us Have Peace: Ulysses S. Grant and the Politics of War and Reconstruction, 1861-1868 |publisher=The University of North Carolina Press |year=1991 |isbn=978-0807819661}}
* {{cite book |last=Wilson |first=Edmund |title=Patriotic Gore: Studies in the Literature of the American Civil War |year=1962 |publisher=W. W. Norton & Company |isbn=978-0-393-31256-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TPpkiosd5MgC |chapter=Northern Soldiers: Ulysses S. Grant}}
* {{cite book |last=Young |first=John Russell |author-link=John Russell Young |year=1879a |publisher=]
|url=https://archive.org/details/aroundworldwithg01youn_0 |title=Around the World with General Grant |volume=I }}
* {{cite book |last=Young |first=John Russell |author-link=John Russell Young |author-mask=2 |year=1879b |publisher=American News Company |url=https://archive.org/details/aroundworldwithg02youn_0 |title=Around the World with General Grant |volume=II }}
{{refend}} {{refend}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{Sister project links|wikt=no|commons=Ulysses S. Grant|b=no|n=no|q=Ulysses S. Grant|s=Author:Ulysses S. Grant|v=no|species=no}} {{Sister project links|wikt=no|commons=Ulysses S. Grant|b=no|n=no|q=Ulysses S. Grant|s=Author:Ulysses S. Grant|v=no|species=no|d=y}}
*
*
* *
* {{Gutenberg author | id=527}}
*
* {{Librivox author |id=296}}
* at ]'s '']''
* – ]
*
* , BBC Radio{{nbsp}}4 discussion with Robert Cooke, Eric Matheson, and Susan Mary Grant (May 30, 2019)
*
* on ]
* at ]
* at the ]


{{Ulysses S. Grant}}
{{Navboxes {{Navboxes
|title=Offices and distinctions |title=Offices and distinctions
|list1= |list=
{{s-start}} {{s-start}}
{{s-mil}} {{s-mil}}
{{s-new|office|rows=2}} {{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=Commander of the ]|years=1862–1863}} {{s-ttl|title=]|years=1864–1869}}
{{s-aft|rows=3|after=]}} {{s-aft|after=]}}
{{s-break}}
{{s-ttl|title=Commander of the Military Division of the Mississippi River|years=1863–1864}}
{{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=]|years=1864–1869}}
{{s-ppo}}
{{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=] ]|years=], ]}}
{{s-aft|after=]}}
{{s-off}} {{s-off}}
{{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=Acting ]|years=1867–1868}}
{{s-aft|after=]}}
{{s-break}}
{{s-bef|before=]}} {{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=]|years=1869–1877}} {{s-ttl|title=]|years=1869–1877}}
{{s-aft|after=]}} {{s-aft|after=]}}
{{s-hon}} {{s-break}}
{{s-ppo}}
{{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=]|years=1875–1885}}
{{s-ttl|title={{nowrap|] nominee for President of the United States}}|years=], ]}}
{{s-aft|after=]}}
{{s-aft|after=]}}
{{s-break}}
{{s-npo|nra}}
{{s-bef|before=]}}
{{s-ttl|title=]|years=1883–1884}}
{{s-aft|after=]}}
{{s-end}} {{s-end}}
}} }}
{{Navboxes {{Navboxes
|title=Articles related to Ulysses S. Grant |title=Articles related to Ulysses S. Grant
|list1= |list=
{{US Presidents}} {{US Presidents}}
{{USRepPresNominees}} {{USRepPresNominees}}
{{Grant cabinet}} {{Grant cabinet}}
{{US Army Chiefs of Staff}} {{US Army Chiefs of Staff}}
{{American Civil War |state=collapsed}}
{{Reconstruction Era}}
{{Hall of Fame for Great Americans}}
{{United States presidential election, 1868}}
{{United States presidential election, 1872}}
{{United States presidential election, 1876}}
{{United States presidential election, 1880}}
}} }}
{{Portal bar|Biography|Politics|American Civil War|Ohio|Illinois|United States}}
{{Authority control|LCCN=n/80/126151|VIAF=66505625|GND=118718436}}
{{Authority control}}


{{Persondata
|NAME=Grant, Ulysses S.
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES=Hiram Ulysses Grant
|SHORT DESCRIPTION=] ] and ] who was elected the 18th ]
|DATE OF BIRTH=April 27, 1822
|PLACE OF BIRTH=], ]
|DATE OF DEATH=July 23, 1885
|PLACE OF DEATH=], ]
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Grant, Ulysses S.}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Grant, Ulysses S.}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]

{{Link FA|sh}}

Latest revision as of 17:34, 5 January 2025

Civil War general, U.S. president (1869 to 1877) Several terms redirect here. For other uses, see General Grant (disambiguation), President Grant (disambiguation), and Ulysses S. Grant (disambiguation).

Ulysses S. Grant
Grant c. 1870–1880
18th President of the United States
In office
March 4, 1869 – March 4, 1877
Vice President
Preceded byAndrew Johnson
Succeeded byRutherford B. Hayes
Commanding General of the U.S. Army
In office
March 9, 1864 – March 4, 1869
President
Preceded byHenry Halleck
Succeeded byWilliam Tecumseh Sherman
Acting United States Secretary of War
In office
August 12, 1867 – January 14, 1868
PresidentAndrew Johnson
Preceded byEdwin Stanton
Succeeded byEdwin Stanton
President of the National Rifle Association
In office
1883–1884
Preceded byE. L. Molineux
Succeeded byPhilip Sheridan
Personal details
BornHiram Ulysses Grant
(1822-04-27)April 27, 1822
Point Pleasant, Ohio, U.S.
DiedJuly 23, 1885(1885-07-23) (aged 63)
Wilton, New York, U.S.
Resting placeGrant's Tomb, New York City
Political partyRepublican
Spouse Julia Dent ​(m. 1848)
Children
Parents
EducationUnited States Military Academy
Occupation
  • Military officer
  • politician
SignatureCursive signature in ink
Nicknames
  • Sam
  • Unconditional Surrender
Military service
Branch/service
Years of service
  • 1839–1854
  • 1861–1869
Rank
Commands
Battles/wars See list

Ulysses S. Grant (born Hiram Ulysses Grant; April 27, 1822 – July 23, 1885) was the 18th president of the United States, serving from 1869 to 1877. In 1865, as commanding general, Grant led the Union Army to victory in the American Civil War.

Grant was born in Ohio and graduated from the United States Military Academy (West Point) in 1843. He served with distinction in the Mexican–American War, but resigned from the army in 1854 and returned to civilian life impoverished. In 1861, shortly after the Civil War began, Grant joined the Union Army and rose to prominence after securing victories in the western theater. In 1863, he led the Vicksburg campaign that gave Union forces control of the Mississippi River and dealt a major strategic blow to the Confederacy. President Abraham Lincoln promoted Grant to lieutenant general and command of all Union armies after his victory at Chattanooga. For thirteen months, Grant fought Robert E. Lee during the high-casualty Overland Campaign which ended with the capture of Lee's army at Appomattox, where he formally surrendered to Grant. In 1866, President Andrew Johnson promoted Grant to General of the Army. Later, Grant broke with Johnson over Reconstruction policies. A war hero, drawn in by his sense of duty, Grant was unanimously nominated by the Republican Party and then elected president in 1868.

As president, Grant stabilized the post-war national economy, supported congressional Reconstruction and the Fifteenth Amendment, and prosecuted the Ku Klux Klan. Under Grant, the Union was completely restored. An effective civil rights executive, Grant signed a bill to create the United States Department of Justice and worked with Radical Republicans to protect African Americans during Reconstruction. In 1871, he created the first Civil Service Commission, advancing the civil service more than any prior president. Grant was re-elected in the 1872 presidential election, but was inundated by executive scandals during his second term. His response to the Panic of 1873 was ineffective in halting the Long Depression, which contributed to the Democrats winning the House majority in 1874. Grant's Native American policy was to assimilate Indians into Anglo-American culture. In Grant's foreign policy, the Alabama Claims against Britain were peacefully resolved, but the Senate rejected Grant's annexation of Santo Domingo. In the disputed 1876 presidential election, Grant facilitated the approval by Congress of a peaceful compromise.

Leaving office in 1877, Grant undertook a world tour, becoming the first president to circumnavigate the world. In 1880, he was unsuccessful in obtaining the Republican nomination for a third term. In 1885, impoverished and dying of throat cancer, Grant wrote his memoirs, covering his life through the Civil War, which were posthumously published and became a major critical and financial success. At his death, Grant was the most popular American and was memorialized as a symbol of national unity. Due to the pseudohistorical and negationist mythology of the Lost Cause of the Confederacy spread by Confederate sympathizers around the turn of the 20th century, historical assessments and rankings of Grant's presidency suffered considerably before they began recovering in the 21st century. Grant's critics take a negative view of his economic mismanagement and the corruption within his administration, while his admirers emphasize his policy towards Native Americans, vigorous enforcement of civil and voting rights for African Americans, and securing North and South as a single nation within the Union. Modern scholarship has better appreciated Grant's appointments of Cabinet reformers.

Early life and education

Further information: Early life and career of Ulysses S. Grant
Color drawing of Grant's birthplace, a simple one-story structure, with fence and trees in front, next to the Ohio River with steamboat passing by
Grant's birthplace in Point Pleasant, Ohio

Grant's father Jesse Root Grant was a Whig Party supporter and a fervent abolitionist. Jesse and Hannah Simpson were married on June 24, 1821, and their first child, Hiram Ulysses Grant, was born on April 27, 1822. The name Ulysses was drawn from ballots placed in a hat. To honor his father-in-law, Jesse named the boy "Hiram Ulysses", though he always referred to him as "Ulysses". In 1823, the family moved to Georgetown, Ohio, where five siblings were born: Simpson, Clara, Orvil, Jennie, and Mary. At the age of five, Ulysses started at a subscription school and later attended two private schools. In the winter of 1836–1837, Grant was a student at Maysville Seminary, and in the autumn of 1838, he attended John Rankin's academy.

In his youth, Grant developed an unusual ability to ride and manage horses; his father gave him work driving supply wagons and transporting people. Unlike his siblings, Grant was not forced to attend church by his Methodist parents. For the rest of his life, he prayed privately and never officially joined any denomination. To others, including his own son, Grant appeared to be agnostic. Grant was largely apolitical before the war but wrote, "If I had ever had any political sympathies they would have been with the Whigs. I was raised in that school."

Early military career and personal life

West Point and first assignment

Engraving of a young Grant in uniform
Grant as a young officer, c. 1845–1847

At Jesse Grant's request, Representative Thomas L. Hamer nominated Ulysses to the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, in spring 1839. Grant was accepted on July 1. Unfamiliar with Grant, Hamer altered his name, so Grant was enlisted under the name "U. S. Grant". Since the initials "U.S." also stood for "Uncle Sam", he became known among army colleagues as "Sam."

Initially, Grant was indifferent to military life, but within a year he reexamined his desire to leave the academy and later wrote that "on the whole I like this place very much". He earned a reputation as the "most proficient" horseman. Seeking relief from military routine, he studied under Romantic artist Robert Walter Weir, producing nine surviving artworks. He spent more time reading books from the library than his academic texts. On Sundays, cadets were required to march to services at the academy's church, which Grant disliked. Quiet by nature, he established a few intimate friends among fellow cadets, including Frederick Tracy Dent and James Longstreet. He was inspired both by the Commandant, Captain Charles Ferguson Smith, and by General Winfield Scott, who visited the academy to review the cadets. Grant later wrote of the military life, "there is much to dislike, but more to like."

Grant graduated on June 30, 1843, ranked 21st out of 39 in his class and was promoted the next day to brevet second lieutenant. He planned to resign his commission after his four-year term. He would later write that among the happiest days of his life were the day he left the presidency and the day he left the academy. Despite his excellent horsemanship, he was not assigned to the cavalry, but to the 4th Infantry Regiment. Grant's first assignment was the Jefferson Barracks near St. Louis, Missouri. Commanded by Colonel Stephen W. Kearny, this was the nation's largest military base in the West. Grant was happy with his commander but looked forward to the end of his military service and a possible teaching career.

Marriage and family

In 1844, Grant accompanied Frederick Dent to Missouri and met his family, including Dent's sister Julia. The two soon became engaged. On August 22, 1848, they were married at Julia's home in St. Louis. Grant's abolitionist father disapproved of the Dents' owning slaves, and neither of Grant's parents attended the wedding. Grant was flanked by three fellow West Point graduates in their blue uniforms, including Longstreet, Julia's cousin.

The couple had four children: Frederick, Ulysses Jr. ("Buck"), Ellen ("Nellie"), and Jesse II. After the wedding, Grant obtained a two-month extension to his leave and returned to St. Louis, where he decided that, with a wife to support, he would remain in the army.

Mexican–American War

Main article: Mexican–American War
An American depiction of the Battle of Monterrey within the city
The Battle of Monterrey during which Grant saw military action

Grant's unit was stationed in Louisiana as part of the Army of Occupation under Major General Zachary Taylor. In September 1846, President James K. Polk ordered Taylor to march 150 miles (240 km) south to the Rio Grande. Marching to Fort Texas, to prevent a Mexican siege, Grant experienced combat for the first time on May 8, 1846, at the Battle of Palo Alto. Grant served as regimental quartermaster, but yearned for a combat role; when finally allowed, he led a charge at the Battle of Resaca de la Palma. He demonstrated his equestrian ability at the Battle of Monterrey by volunteering to carry a dispatch past snipers; he hung off the side of his horse, keeping the animal between him and the enemy. Polk, wary of Taylor's growing popularity, divided his forces, sending some troops (including Grant's unit) to form a new army under Major General Winfield Scott.

Traveling by sea, Scott's army landed at Veracruz and advanced toward Mexico City. They met the Mexican forces at the battles of Molino del Rey and Chapultepec. For his bravery at Molino del Rey, Grant was brevetted first lieutenant on September 30. At San Cosmé, Grant directed his men to drag a disassembled howitzer into a church steeple, then reassembled it and bombarded nearby Mexican troops. His bravery and initiative earned him his brevet promotion to captain. On September 14, 1847, Scott's army marched into the city; Mexico ceded the vast territory, including California, to the U.S. on February 2, 1848. During the war, Grant established a commendable record as a daring and competent soldier and began to consider a career in the army. He studied the tactics and strategies of Scott and Taylor and emerged as a seasoned officer, writing in his memoirs that this is how he learned much about military leadership. In retrospect, although he respected Scott, he identified his own leadership style with Taylor's. Grant later believed the Mexican war was morally unjust and that the territorial gains were designed to expand slavery. He opined that the Civil War was divine punishment for U.S. aggression against Mexico.

Historians have pointed to the importance of Grant's experience as an assistant quartermaster during the war. Although he was initially averse to the position, it prepared Grant in understanding military supply routes, transportation systems, and logistics, particularly with regard to "provisioning a large, mobile army operating in hostile territory", according to biographer Ronald White. Grant came to recognize how wars could be won or lost by factors beyond the battlefield.

Post-war assignments and resignation

Grant's first post-war assignments took him and Julia to Detroit on November 17, 1848, but he was soon transferred to Madison Barracks, a desolate outpost in upstate New York, in bad need of supplies and repair. After four months, Grant was sent back to his quartermaster job in Detroit. When the discovery of gold in California brought prospectors and settlers to the territory, Grant and the 4th infantry were ordered to reinforce the small garrison there. Grant was charged with bringing the soldiers and a few hundred civilians from New York City to Panama, overland to the Pacific and then north to California. Julia, eight months pregnant with Ulysses Jr., did not accompany him.

While Grant was in Panama, a cholera epidemic killed many soldiers and civilians. Grant organized a field hospital in Panama City, and moved the worst cases to a hospital barge offshore. When orderlies protested having to attend to the sick, Grant did much of the nursing himself, earning high praise from observers. In August, Grant arrived in San Francisco. His next assignment sent him north to Vancouver Barracks in the Oregon Territory.

Grant tried several business ventures but failed, and in one instance his business partner absconded with $800 of Grant's investment, equivalent to $23,000 in 2023. After he witnessed white agents cheating local Indians of their supplies, and their devastation by smallpox and measles transferred to them by white settlers, he developed empathy for their plight.

Promoted to captain on August 5, 1853, Grant was assigned to command Company F, 4th Infantry, at the newly constructed Fort Humboldt in California. Grant arrived at Fort Humboldt on January 5, 1854, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Robert C. Buchanan. Separated from his family, Grant began to drink. Colonel Buchanan reprimanded Grant for one drinking episode and told Grant to "resign or reform." Grant told Buchanan he would "resign if I don't reform." On Sunday, Grant was found influenced by alcohol, but not incapacitated, at his company's paytable. Keeping his pledge to Buchanan, Grant resigned, effective July 31, 1854. Buchanan endorsed Grant's resignation but did not submit any report that verified the incident. Grant did not face court-martial, and the War Department said: "Nothing stands against his good name." Grant said years later, "the vice of intemperance (drunkenness) had not a little to do with my decision to resign." With no means of support, Grant returned to St. Louis and reunited with his family.

Civilian struggles, slavery, and politics

A small log cabin
"Hardscrabble", the log house built by Grant in between wars

In 1854, at age 32, Grant entered civilian life, without any money-making vocation to support his growing family. It was the beginning of seven years of financial struggles and instability. Grant's father offered him a place in the Galena, Illinois, branch of the family's leather business, but demanded Julia and the children stay in Missouri, with the Dents, or with the Grants in Kentucky. Grant and Julia declined. For the next four years, Grant farmed with the help of Julia's slave, Dan, on his brother-in-law's property, Wish-ton-wish, near St. Louis. The farm was not successful and to earn a living he sold firewood on St. Louis street corners.

In 1856, the Grants moved to land on Julia's father's farm, and built a home called "Hardscrabble" on Grant's Farm; Julia described it as an "unattractive cabin". Grant's family had little money, clothes, and furniture, but always had enough food. During the Panic of 1857, which devastated Grant as it did many farmers, Grant pawned his gold watch to buy Christmas gifts. In 1858, Grant rented out Hardscrabble and moved his family to Julia's father's 850-acre plantation. That fall, after having malaria, Grant gave up farming.

That same year, Grant acquired a slave from his father-in-law, a thirty-five-year-old man named William Jones. Although Grant was not an abolitionist at the time, he disliked slavery and could not bring himself to force an enslaved man to work. In March 1859, Grant freed Jones by a manumission deed, potentially worth at least $1,000 (equivalent to $34,000 in 2023).

Grant moved to St. Louis, taking on a partnership with Julia's cousin Harry Boggs working in the real estate business as a bill collector, again without success and at Julia's prompting ended the partnership. In August, Grant applied for a position as county engineer. He had thirty-five notable recommendations, but Grant was passed over by the Free Soil and Republican county commissioners because he was believed to share his father-in-law's Democratic sentiments.

In April 1860, Grant and his family moved north to Galena, accepting a position in his father's leather goods business, "Grant & Perkins", run by his younger brothers Simpson and Orvil. In a few months, Grant paid off his debts. The family attended the local Methodist church and he soon established himself as a reputable citizen.

Civil War

Main article: Ulysses S. Grant and the American Civil War
Brigadier General Grant, 1861

On April 12, 1861, the American Civil War began when Confederate troops attacked Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina. The news came as a shock in Galena, and Grant shared his neighbors' concern about the war. On April 15, Lincoln called for 75,000 volunteers. The next day, Grant attended a mass meeting to assess the crisis and encourage recruitment, and a speech by his father's attorney, John Aaron Rawlins, stirred Grant's patriotism. In an April 21 letter to his father, Grant wrote out his views on the upcoming conflict: "We have a government and laws and a flag, and they must all be sustained. There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots."

Early commands

Further information: Kentucky in the American Civil War

On April 18, Grant chaired a second recruitment meeting, but turned down a captain's position as commander of the newly formed militia company, hoping his experience would aid him to obtain a more senior rank. His early efforts to be recommissioned were rejected by Major General George B. McClellan and Brigadier General Nathaniel Lyon. On April 29, supported by Congressman Elihu B. Washburne of Illinois, Grant was appointed military aide to Governor Richard Yates and mustered ten regiments into the Illinois militia. On June 14, again aided by Washburne, Grant was appointed colonel and put in charge of the 21st Illinois Volunteer Infantry Regiment; he appointed John A. Rawlins as his aide-de-camp and brought order and discipline to the regiment. Soon after, Grant and the 21st Regiment were transferred to Missouri to dislodge Confederate forces.

On August 5, with Washburne's aid, Grant was appointed brigadier general of volunteers. Major General John C. Frémont, Union commander of the West, passed over senior generals and appointed Grant commander of the District of Southeastern Missouri. On September 2, Grant arrived at Cairo, Illinois, assumed command by replacing Colonel Richard J. Oglesby, and set up his headquarters to plan a campaign down the Mississippi, and up the Tennessee and Cumberland rivers.

After the Confederates moved into western Kentucky, taking Columbus, with designs on southern Illinois, Grant notified Frémont and, without waiting for his reply, advanced on Paducah, Kentucky, taking it without a fight on September 6. Having understood the importance to Lincoln of Kentucky's neutrality, Grant assured its citizens, "I have come among you not as your enemy, but as your friend." On November 1, Frémont ordered Grant to "make demonstrations" against the Confederates on both sides of the Mississippi, but prohibited him from attacking.

Belmont (1861), Forts Henry and Donelson (1862)

Main articles: Battle of Belmont, Battle of Fort Henry, and Battle of Fort Donelson
Battle of Fort Donelson by Kurz and Allison, 1887

On November 2, 1861, Lincoln removed Frémont from command, freeing Grant to attack Confederate soldiers encamped in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. On November 5, Grant, along with Brigadier General John A. McClernand, landed 2,500 men at Hunter's Point, and on November 7 engaged the Confederates at the Battle of Belmont. The Union army took the camp, but the reinforced Confederates under Brigadier Generals Frank Cheatham and Gideon J. Pillow forced a chaotic Union retreat. Grant had wanted to destroy Confederate strongholds at Belmont, Missouri, and Columbus, Kentucky, but was not given enough troops and was only able to disrupt their positions. Grant's troops escaped back to Cairo under fire from the fortified stronghold at Columbus. Although Grant and his army retreated, the battle gave his volunteers much-needed confidence and experience.

Columbus blocked Union access to the lower Mississippi. Grant and lieutenant colonel James B. McPherson planned to bypass Columbus and move against Fort Henry on the Tennessee River. They would then march east to Fort Donelson on the Cumberland River, with the aid of gunboats, opening both rivers and allowing the Union access further south. Grant presented his plan to Henry Halleck, his new commander in the newly created Department of Missouri. Halleck rebuffed Grant, believing he needed twice the number of troops. However, after consulting McClellan, he finally agreed on the condition that the attack would be in close cooperation with the navy Flag Officer, Andrew H. Foote. Foote's gunboats bombarded Fort Henry, leading to its surrender on February 6, 1862, before Grant's infantry even arrived.

Grant ordered an immediate assault on Fort Donelson, which dominated the Cumberland River. Unaware of the garrison's strength, Grant, McClernand, and Smith positioned their divisions around the fort. The next day McClernand and Smith independently launched probing attacks on apparent weak spots but were forced to retreat. On February 14, Foote's gunboats began bombarding the fort, only to be repulsed by its heavy guns. The next day, Pillow attacked and routed McClernand's division. Union reinforcements arrived, giving Grant a total force of over 40,000 men. Grant was with Foote four miles away when the Confederates attacked. Hearing the battle, Grant rode back and rallied his troop commanders, riding over seven miles of freezing roads and trenches, exchanging reports. When Grant blocked the Nashville Road, the Confederates retreated back into Fort Donelson. On February 16, Foote resumed his bombardment, signaling a general attack. Confederate generals John B. Floyd and Pillow fled, leaving the fort in command of Simon Bolivar Buckner, who submitted to Grant's demand for "unconditional and immediate surrender".

Grant had won the first major victory for the Union, capturing Floyd's entire army of more than 12,000. Halleck was angry that Grant had acted without his authorization and complained to McClellan, accusing Grant of "neglect and inefficiency". On March 3, Halleck sent a telegram to Washington complaining that he had no communication with Grant for a week. Three days later, Halleck claimed "word has just reached me that ... Grant has resumed his bad habits (of drinking)." Lincoln, regardless, promoted Grant to major general of volunteers and the Northern press treated Grant as a hero. Playing off his initials, they took to calling him "Unconditional Surrender Grant".

Shiloh (1862) and aftermath

Further information: Battle of Shiloh
Battle of Shiloh by Thure de Thulstrup, 1888

Reinstated by Halleck at the urging of Lincoln and Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, Grant rejoined his army with orders to advance with the Army of the Tennessee into Tennessee. His main army was located at Pittsburg Landing, while 40,000 Confederate troops converged at Corinth, Mississippi. Grant wanted to attack the Confederates at Corinth, but Halleck ordered him not to attack until Major General Don Carlos Buell arrived with his division of 25,000. Grant prepared for an attack on the Confederate army of roughly equal strength. Instead of preparing defensive fortifications, they spent most of their time drilling the largely inexperienced troops while Sherman dismissed reports of nearby Confederates.

On the morning of April 6, 1862, Grant's troops were taken by surprise when the Confederates, led by Generals Albert Sidney Johnston and P. G. T. Beauregard, struck first "like an Alpine avalanche" near Shiloh church, attacking five divisions of Grant's army and forcing a confused retreat toward the Tennessee River. Johnston was killed and command fell upon Beauregard. One Union line held the Confederate attack off for several hours, giving Grant time to assemble artillery and 20,000 troops near Pittsburg Landing. The Confederates finally broke and captured a Union division, but Grant's newly assembled line held the landing, while the exhausted Confederates, lacking reinforcements, halted their advance.

Bolstered by 18,000 troops from the divisions of Major Generals Buell and Lew Wallace, Grant counterattacked at dawn the next day and regained the field, forcing the disorganized and demoralized rebels to retreat to Corinth. Halleck ordered Grant not to advance more than one day's march from Pittsburg Landing, stopping the pursuit. Although Grant had won the battle, the situation was little changed. Grant, now realizing that the South was determined to fight, would later write, "Then, indeed, I gave up all idea of saving the Union except by complete conquest."

Shiloh was the costliest battle in American history to that point and the staggering 23,746 casualties stunned the nation. Briefly hailed a hero for routing the Confederates, Grant was soon mired in controversy. The Northern press castigated Grant for shockingly high casualties, and accused him of drunkenness during the battle, contrary to the accounts of those with him at the time. Discouraged, Grant considered resigning but Sherman convinced him to stay. Lincoln dismissed Grant's critics, saying "I can't spare this man; he fights." Grant's costly victory at Shiloh ended any chance for the Confederates to prevail in the Mississippi valley or regain its strategic advantage in the West.

Halleck arrived from St. Louis on April 11, took command, and assembled a combined army of about 120,000 men. On April 29, he relieved Grant of field command and replaced him with Major General George Henry Thomas. Halleck slowly marched his army to take Corinth, entrenching each night. Meanwhile, Beauregard pretended to be reinforcing, sent "deserters" to the Union Army with that story, and moved his army out during the night, to Halleck's surprise when he finally arrived at Corinth on May 30.

Halleck divided his combined army and reinstated Grant as field commander on July 11. Later that year, on September 19, Grant's army defeated Confederates at the Battle of Iuka, then successfully defended Corinth, inflicting heavy casualties. On October 25, Grant assumed command of the District of the Tennessee. In November, after Lincoln's preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, Grant ordered units under his command to incorporate former slaves into the Union Army, giving them clothes, shelter, and wages for their services.

Vicksburg campaign (1862–1863)

Further information: Vicksburg Campaign and General Order No. 11 (1862)
Grant's successful gamble: Porter's gunboats night ran the Confederate gauntlet at Vicksburg on the Mississippi River.

The Union capture of Vicksburg, the last Confederate stronghold on the Mississippi River, was considered vital as it would split the Confederacy in two. Lincoln appointed McClernand for the job, rather than Grant or Sherman. Halleck, who retained power over troop displacement, ordered McClernand to Memphis, and placed him and his troops under Grant's authority.

On November 13, 1862, Grant captured Holly Springs and advanced to Corinth. His plan was to attack Vicksburg overland, while Sherman would attack Vicksburg from Chickasaw Bayou. However, Confederate cavalry raids on December 11 and 20 broke Union communications and recaptured Holly Springs, preventing Grant and Sherman from converging on Vicksburg. McClernand reached Sherman's army, assumed command, and independently of Grant led a campaign that captured Confederate Fort Hindman. After the sack of Holly Springs, Grant considered and sometimes adopted the strategy of foraging the land, rather than exposing long Union supply lines to enemy attack.

Fugitive African-American slaves poured into Grant's district, whom he sent north to Cairo to be domestic servants in Chicago. However, Lincoln ended this when Illinois political leaders complained. On his own initiative, Grant set up a pragmatic program and hired Presbyterian chaplain John Eaton to administer contraband camps. Freed slaves picked cotton that was shipped north to aid the Union war effort. Lincoln approved and Grant's program was successful. Grant also worked freed black labor on a canal to bypass Vicksburg, incorporating the laborers into the Union Army and Navy.

The Battle of Jackson, fought on May 14, 1863, was part of the Vicksburg Campaign.

Grant's war responsibilities included combating illegal Northern cotton trade and civilian obstruction. He had received numerous complaints about Jewish speculators in his district. The majority, however, of those involved in illegal trading were not Jewish. To help combat this, Grant required two permits, one from the Treasury and one from the Union Army, to purchase cotton. On December 17, 1862, Grant issued a controversial General Order No. 11, expelling "Jews, as a class", from his military district. After complaints, Lincoln rescinded the order on January 3, 1863. Grant finally ended the order on January 17. He later described issuing the order as one of his biggest regrets.

On January 29, 1863, Grant assumed overall command. To bypass Vicksburg's guns, Grant slowly advanced his Union army south through water-logged terrain. The plan of attacking Vicksburg from downriver was risky because, east of the river, his army would be distanced from most of its supply lines, and would have to rely on foraging. On April 16, Grant ordered Admiral David Dixon Porter's gunboats south under fire from the Vicksburg batteries to meet up with troops who had marched south down the west side of the river. Grant ordered diversionary battles, confusing Pemberton and allowing Grant's army to move east across the Mississippi. Grant's army captured Jackson. Advancing west, he defeated Pemberton's army at the Battle of Champion Hill on May 16, forcing their retreat into Vicksburg.

After Grant's men assaulted the entrenchments twice, suffering severe losses, they settled in for a siege which lasted seven weeks. During quiet periods of the campaign, Grant would drink on occasion. The personal rivalry between McClernand and Grant continued until Grant removed him from command when he contravened Grant by publishing an order without permission. Pemberton surrendered Vicksburg to Grant on July 4, 1863.

Vicksburg's fall gave Union forces control of the Mississippi River and split the Confederacy. By that time, Grant's political sympathies fully coincided with the Radical Republicans' aggressive prosecution of the war and emancipation of the slaves. The success at Vicksburg was a morale boost for the Union war effort. When Stanton suggested Grant be brought east to run the Army of the Potomac, Grant demurred, writing that he knew the geography and resources of the West better and he did not want to upset the chain of command in the East.

Chattanooga (1863) and promotion

Further information: Chattanooga Campaign
Union troops swarm Missionary Ridge and defeat Bragg's army.

On October 16, 1863, Lincoln promoted Grant to major general in the regular army and assigned him command of the newly formed Division of the Mississippi, which comprised the Armies of the Ohio, the Tennessee, and the Cumberland. After the Battle of Chickamauga, the Army of the Cumberland retreated into Chattanooga, where they were partially besieged. Grant arrived in Chattanooga, where plans to resupply and break the partial siege had already been set. Forces commanded by Major General Joseph Hooker, which had been sent from the Army of the Potomac, approached from the west and linked up with other units moving east from inside the city, capturing Brown's Ferry and opening a supply line to the railroad at Bridgeport.

Grant planned to have Sherman's Army of the Tennessee, assisted by the Army of the Cumberland, assault the northern end of Missionary Ridge and roll down it on the enemy's right flank. On November 23, Major General George Henry Thomas surprised the enemy in open daylight, advancing the Union lines and taking Orchard Knob, between Chattanooga and the ridge. The next day, Sherman failed to get atop Missionary Ridge, which was key to Grant's plan of battle. Hooker's forces took Lookout Mountain in unexpected success. On the 25th, Grant ordered Thomas to advance to the rifle-pits at the base of Missionary Ridge after Sherman's army failed to take Missionary Ridge from the northeast. Four divisions of the Army of the Cumberland, with the center two led by Major General Philip Sheridan and Brigadier General Thomas J. Wood, chased the Confederates out of the rifle-pits at the base and, against orders, continued the charge up the 45-degree slope and captured the Confederate entrenchments along the crest, forcing a hurried retreat. The decisive battle gave the Union control of Tennessee and opened Georgia, the Confederate heartland, to Union invasion.

On March 2, 1864, Lincoln promoted Grant to lieutenant general, giving him command of all Union Armies. Grant's new rank had previously been held only by George Washington. Grant arrived in Washington on March 8 and was formally commissioned by Lincoln the next day at a Cabinet meeting. Grant developed a good working relationship with Lincoln, who allowed Grant to devise his own strategy.

Grant established his headquarters with General George Meade's Army of the Potomac in Culpeper, Virginia, and met weekly with Lincoln and Stanton in Washington. After protest from Halleck, Grant scrapped a risky invasion of North Carolina and planned five coordinated Union offensives to prevent Confederate armies from shifting troops along interior lines. Grant and Meade would make a direct frontal attack on Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia, while Sherman—now in command of all western armies—would destroy Joseph E. Johnston's Army of Tennessee and take Atlanta. Major General Benjamin Butler would advance on Lee from the southeast, up the James River, while Major General Nathaniel Banks would capture Mobile. Major General Franz Sigel was to capture granaries and rail lines in the fertile Shenandoah Valley. Grant now commanded 533,000 battle-ready troops spread out over an eighteen-mile front.

Overland Campaign (1864)

Main article: Overland Campaign

The Overland Campaign was a series of brutal battles fought in Virginia during May and June 1864. Sigel's and Butler's efforts failed, and Grant was left alone to fight Lee. On May 4, Grant led the army from his headquarters towards Germanna Ford. They crossed the Rapidan unopposed. On May 5, the Union army attacked Lee in the battle of the Wilderness, a three-day battle with estimated casualties of 17,666 Union and 11,125 Confederate.

Rather than retreat, Grant flanked Lee's army to the southeast and attempted to wedge his forces between Lee and Richmond at Spotsylvania Court House. Lee's army got to Spotsylvania first and a costly battle ensued, lasting thirteen days, with heavy casualties. On May 12, Grant attempted to break through Lee's Muleshoe salient guarded by Confederate artillery, resulting in one of the bloodiest assaults of the Civil War, known as the Bloody Angle. Unable to break Lee's lines, Grant again flanked the rebels to the southeast, meeting at North Anna, where a battle lasted three days.

Cold Harbor

Main article: Battle of Cold Harbor
General Grant at his headquarters in Cold Harbor, Virginia, June 1864

The recent bloody Wilderness campaign had severely diminished Confederate morale; Grant believed breaking through Lee's lines at its weakest point, Cold Harbor, a vital road hub that linked to Richmond, would mean a quick end to the war. Grant already had two corps in position at Cold Harbor with Hancock's corps on the way.

Lee's lines were extended north and east of Richmond and Petersburg for approximately ten miles, but at several points there were no fortifications built yet, including Cold Harbor. On June 1 and 2 both Grant and Lee were waiting for reinforcements to arrive. Hancock's men had marched all night and arrived too exhausted for an immediate attack that morning. Grant postponed the attack until 5 p.m., and then again until 4:30 a.m. on June 3. However, Grant and Meade did not give specific orders for the attack, leaving it up to the corps commanders to coordinate. Grant had not yet learned that overnight Lee had hastily constructed entrenchments to thwart any breach attempt at Cold Harbor. Grant was anxious to make his move before the rest of Lee's army arrived. On the morning of June 3, with a force of more than 100,000 men, against Lee's 59,000, Grant attacked, not realizing that Lee's army was now well entrenched, much of it obscured by trees and bushes. Grant's army suffered 12,000–14,000 casualties, while Lee's army suffered 3,000–5,000 casualties, but Lee was less able to replace them.

The unprecedented number of casualties heightened anti-war sentiment in the North. After the battle, Grant wanted to appeal to Lee under the white flag for each side to gather up their wounded, most of them Union soldiers, but Lee insisted that a total truce be enacted and while they were deliberating all but a few of the wounded died in the field. Without giving an apology for the disastrous defeat in his official military report, Grant confided in his staff after the battle and years later wrote in his memoirs that he "regretted that the last assault at Cold Harbor was ever made."

Siege of Petersburg (1864–1865)

Further information: Siege of Petersburg and Battle of the Crater

Undetected by Lee, Grant moved his army south of the James River, freed Butler from the Bermuda Hundred, and advanced toward Petersburg, Virginia's central railroad hub, resulting in a nine-month siege. Northern resentment grew. Sheridan was assigned command of the Union Army of the Shenandoah and Grant directed him to "follow the enemy to their death" in the Shenandoah Valley. After Grant's abortive attempt to capture Petersburg, Lincoln supported Grant in his decision to continue.

Grant had to commit troops to check Confederate General Jubal Early's raids in the Shenandoah Valley, which were getting dangerously close to Washington. By late July, at Petersburg, Grant reluctantly approved a plan to blow up part of the enemy trenches from a tunnel filled with gunpowder. The massive explosion instantly killed an entire Confederate regiment. The poorly led Union troops under Major General Ambrose Burnside and Brigadier General James H. Ledlie, rather than encircling the crater, rushed into it. Recovering from the surprise, Confederates, led by Major General William Mahone, surrounded the crater and easily picked off Union troops. The Union's 3,500 casualties outnumbered the Confederates' three-to-one. The battle marked the first time that Union black troops, who endured a large proportion of the casualties, engaged in any major battle in the east. Grant admitted that the tactic had been a "stupendous failure".

Grant (center left) next to Lincoln with General Sherman (far left) and Admiral Porter (right) – The Peacemakers by George Peter Alexander Healy, 1868

Grant would later meet with Lincoln and testify at a court of inquiry against Generals Burnside and Ledlie for their incompetence. In his memoirs, he blamed them for that disastrous Union defeat. Rather than fight Lee in a full-frontal attack as he had done at Cold Harbor, Grant continued to force Lee to extend his defenses south and west of Petersburg, better allowing him to capture essential railroad links.

Union forces soon captured Mobile Bay and Atlanta and now controlled the Shenandoah Valley, ensuring Lincoln's reelection in November. Sherman convinced Grant and Lincoln to allow his army to march on Savannah. Sherman cut a 60-mile (97 km) path of destruction unopposed, reached the Atlantic Ocean, and captured Savannah on December 22. On December 16, after much prodding by Grant, the Union Army under Thomas smashed John Bell Hood's Confederates at Nashville. These campaigns left Lee's forces at Petersburg as the only significant obstacle remaining to Union victory.

By March 1865, Lee was trapped and his strength severely weakened. He was running out of reserves to replace the high battlefield casualties and remaining Confederate troops, no longer having confidence in their commander and under the duress of trench warfare, deserted by the thousands. On March 25, in a desperate effort, Lee sacrificed his remaining troops (4,000 Confederate casualties) at Fort Stedman, a Union victory and the last Petersburg line battle.

Surrender of Lee and Union victory (1865)

Main articles: Third Battle of Petersburg, Appomattox Campaign, and Battle of Appomattox Court House
Defeated by Grant, Lee surrendered at Appomattox Court House.

On April 2, Grant ordered a general assault on Lee's forces; Lee abandoned Petersburg and Richmond, which Grant captured. A desperate Lee and part of his army attempted to link up with the remnants of Joseph E. Johnston's army. Sheridan's cavalry stopped the two armies from converging, cutting them off from their supply trains. Grant sent his aide Orville Babcock to carry his last dispatch to Lee demanding his surrender. Grant immediately rode west, bypassing Lee's army, to join Sheridan who had captured Appomattox Station, blocking Lee's escape route. On his way, Grant received a letter from Lee stating Lee would surrender his army.

On April 9, Grant and Lee met at Appomattox Court House. Although Grant felt depressed at the fall of "a foe who had fought so long and valiantly," he believed the Southern cause was "one of the worst for which a people ever fought." Grant wrote out the terms of surrender: "each officer and man will be allowed to return to his home, not to be disturbed by U.S. authority so long as they observe their paroles and the laws in force where they may reside." Lee immediately accepted Grant's terms and signed the surrender document, without any diplomatic recognition of the Confederacy. Lee asked that his former Confederate troops keep their horses, which Grant generously allowed. Grant ordered his troops to stop all celebration, saying the "war is over; the rebels are our countrymen again." Johnston's Tennessee army surrendered on April 26, 1865, Richard Taylor's Alabama army on May 4, and Kirby Smith's Texas army on May 26, ending the war.

Lincoln's assassination

Main article: Assassination of Abraham Lincoln

On April 14, 1865, Grant attended a cabinet meeting in Washington. Lincoln invited him and his wife Julia to Ford's Theatre but they declined, because they planned to travel to their home in Burlington. In a conspiracy that also targeted top cabinet members in one last effort to topple the Union, Lincoln was shot by John Wilkes Booth at the theater and died the next morning. Many, including Grant himself, thought that Grant had been a target in the plot, and during the subsequent trial, the government tried to prove that Grant had been stalked by Booth's conspirator Michael O'Laughlen. Stanton notified Grant of the president's death and summoned him to Washington. Vice President Andrew Johnson was sworn in as president on April 15. Grant was determined to work with Johnson, and he privately expressed "every reason to hope" in the new president's ability to run the government "in its old channel".

Commanding generalship (1865–1869)

Main article: Commanding generalship of Ulysses S. Grant
Constant Mayer's portrait of General Grant, 1866

At the war's end, Grant remained commander of the army, with duties that included dealing with Emperor Maximilian and French troops in Mexico, enforcement of Reconstruction in the former Confederate states, and supervision of Indian wars on the western Plains. After the Grand Review of the Armies, Lee and his generals were indicted for treason in Virginia. Johnson demanded they be put on trial, but Grant insisted that they should not be tried, citing his Appomatox amnesty. Charges against Lee were dropped. Grant secured a house for his family in Georgetown Heights in 1865 but instructed Elihu Washburne that for political purposes his legal residence remained in Galena, Illinois. On July 25, 1866, Congress promoted Grant to the newly created rank of General of the Army of the United States.

Tour of the South

Further information: Reconstruction era

President Johnson's Reconstruction policy included a speedy return of the former Confederates to Congress, reinstating white people to office in the South, and relegating black people to second-class citizenship. On November 27, 1865, Grant was sent by Johnson on a fact-finding mission to the South, to counter a pending less favorable report by Senator Carl Schurz which reported that white people in the South harbored resentment of the North, and that black people suffered from violence and fraud. Grant recommended continuation of the Freedmen's Bureau, which Johnson opposed, but advised against using black troops.

Grant believed the people of the South were not ready for self-rule and required federal government protection. Concerned that the war led to diminished respect for civil authorities, he continued using the Army to maintain order. Grant's report on the South, which he later recanted, sympathized with Johnson's Reconstruction policies. Although Grant desired former Confederates be returned to Congress, he advocated eventual black citizenship. On December 19, the day after the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment was announced in the Senate, Johnson's response used Grant's report, read aloud to the Senate, to undermine Schurz's final report and Radical opposition to Johnson's policies.

Break from Johnson

Cartoon illustration from Swingin' Round the Cirkle, or Andy's trip to the West by David Ross Locke, suggesting that Grant was a bigger draw on the multi-city tour than was Johnson

Grant was initially optimistic about Johnson. Despite differing styles, the two got along cordially and Grant attended cabinet meetings concerning Reconstruction. By February 1866, the relationship began to break down. Johnson opposed Grant's closure of the Richmond Examiner for disloyal editorials and his enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, passed over Johnson's veto. Needing Grant's popularity, Johnson took Grant on his "Swing Around the Circle" tour, a failed attempt to gain national support for lenient policies toward the South. Grant privately called Johnson's speeches a "national disgrace" and he left the tour early. On March 2, 1867, overriding Johnson's veto, Congress passed the first of three Reconstruction Acts, using military officers to enforce the policy. Protecting Grant, Congress passed the Command of the Army Act, preventing his removal or relocation, and forcing Johnson to pass orders through Grant.

In August 1867, bypassing the Tenure of Office Act, Johnson discharged Secretary of War Edwin Stanton without Senate approval and appointed Grant ad interim Secretary of War. Stanton was the only remaining cabinet member friendly to the Radicals. Although Grant initially recommended against dismissing Stanton, he accepted the position, not wanting the Army to fall under a conservative appointee who would impede Reconstruction, and managed an uneasy partnership with Johnson.

In December 1867, Congress voted to keep Stanton, who was reinstated by a Senate Committee on January 10, 1868. Grant told Johnson he was going to resign the office to avoid fines and imprisonment. Johnson, who believed the law would be overturned, said he would assume Grant's legal responsibility, and reminded Grant that he had promised to delay his resignation until a suitable replacement was found. The following Monday, not willing to wait for the law to be overturned, Grant surrendered the office to Stanton, causing confusion with Johnson. With the backing of his cabinet, Johnson accused Grant of lying and "duplicity" at a stormy cabinet meeting, while a shocked and disappointed Grant felt it was Johnson who was lying. The publication of angry messages between Grant and Johnson led to a complete break between them. The controversy led to Johnson's impeachment and trial in the Senate; he was acquitted by one vote. Grant's popularity rose among the Radical Republicans and his nomination for the presidency appeared certain.

Election of 1868

Main article: 1868 United States presidential election
Grant–Colfax Republican ticket

At the 1868 Republican National Convention, the delegates unanimously nominated Grant for president on the first ballot and Speaker of the House Schuyler Colfax for vice president on the fifth. Although Grant had preferred to remain in the army, he accepted the Republican nomination, believing that he was the only one who could unify the nation. The Republicans advocated "equal civil and political rights to all" and African American enfranchisement. The Democrats, having abandoned Johnson, nominated former governor Horatio Seymour of New York for president and Francis P. Blair of Missouri for vice president. The Democrats opposed suffrage for African Americans and advocated the immediate restoration of former Confederate states to the Union and amnesty from "all past political offenses".

Grant played no overt role during the campaign and was joined by Sherman and Sheridan in a tour of the West that summer. However, the Republicans adopted his words "Let us have peace" as their campaign slogan. Grant's 1862 General Order No. 11 became an issue during the presidential campaign; he sought to distance himself from the order, saying "I have no prejudice against sect or race, but want each individual to be judged by his own merit." The Democrats and their Klan supporters focused mainly on ending Reconstruction, intimidating black people and Republicans, and returning control of the South to the white Democrats and the planter class, alienating War Democrats in the North. Grant won the popular vote and an Electoral College landslide of 214 votes to Seymour's 80. Seymour received a majority of white voters, but Grant was aided by 500,000 votes cast by black people, winning him 52.7 percent of the popular vote. He lost Louisiana and Georgia, primarily due to Ku Klux Klan violence against African-American voters. At the age of 46, Grant was the youngest president yet elected.

Presidency (1869–1877)

Main article: Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant
Official White House portrait of President Grant by Henry Ulke, 1875

On March 4, 1869, Grant was sworn in as President by Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase. In his inaugural address, Grant urged the ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment; many African Americans attended his inauguration. He urged that bonds issued during the Civil War should be paid in gold, called for "proper treatment" of Native Americans and encouraged their "civilization and ultimate citizenship".

Grant's cabinet appointments sparked both criticism and approval. He appointed Elihu B. Washburne Secretary of State and John A. Rawlins Secretary of War. Washburne resigned, and Grant appointed him Minister to France. Grant then appointed former New York Senator Hamilton Fish Secretary of State. Rawlins died in office, and Grant appointed William W. Belknap Secretary of War. Grant appointed New York businessman Alexander T. Stewart Secretary of Treasury, but Stewart was found legally ineligible by a 1789 law. Grant then appointed Massachusetts Representative George S. Boutwell Secretary of Treasury. Philadelphia businessman Adolph E. Borie was appointed Secretary of Navy, but found the job stressful and resigned. Grant then appointed New Jersey's attorney general, George M. Robeson, Secretary of Navy. Former Ohio Governor Jacob D. Cox (Interior), former Maryland Senator John Creswell (Postmaster-General), and Ebenezer Rockwood Hoar (Attorney General) rounded out the cabinet.

Grant nominated Sherman to succeed him as general-in-chief and gave him control over war bureau chiefs. When Rawlins took over the War Department he complained that Sherman was given too much authority. Grant reluctantly revoked his order, upsetting Sherman and damaging their friendship. James Longstreet, a former Confederate general, was nominated for Surveyor of Customs of New Orleans; this was met with amazement, and seen as a genuine effort to unite the North and South. In March 1872, Grant signed legislation that established Yellowstone National Park, the first national park. Grant was sympathetic to women's rights, including suffrage, saying he wanted "equal rights to all citizens".

To make up for his infamous General Order No. 11, Grant appointed more than fifty Jewish people to federal office, including consuls, district attorneys, and deputy postmasters. He appointed Edward S. Salomon territorial governor of Washington, the first time an American Jewish man occupied a governor's seat. In November 1869, reports surfaced of Alexander II of Russia penalizing 2,000 Jewish families for smuggling by expelling them to the interior of the country. In response, Grant publicly supported the Jewish American B'nai B'rith petition against Alexander. In 1875, Grant proposed a constitutional amendment that limited religious indoctrination in public schools. Schools would be for all children "irrespective of sex, color, birthplace, or religions". Grant's views were incorporated into the Blaine Amendment, but it was defeated by the Senate.

In October 1871, under the Morrill Act, using federal marshals, Grant prosecuted hundreds of Utah Territory Mormon polygamists. Grant called polygamy a "crime against decency and morality". In 1874, Grant signed into law the Poland Act, which made Mormon polygamists subject to trial in District Courts and limited Mormons on juries.

Beginning in March 1873, under the Comstock Act, Grant prosecuted pornographers, in addition to abortionists. To administer the prosecutions, Grant put in charge a vigorous anti-vice activist and reformer Anthony Comstock. Comstock headed a federal commission and was empowered to destroy obscene material and hand out arrest warrants to offenders.

Reconstruction

Main article: Reconstruction era
Amos T. Akerman, appointed Attorney General by Grant, who vigorously prosecuted the Ku Klux Klan

Grant was considered an effective civil rights president, concerned about the plight of African Americans. On March 18, 1869, Grant signed into law equal rights for black people, to serve on juries and hold office, in Washington D.C., and in 1870 he signed the Naturalization Act that gave foreign black people citizenship. During his first term, Reconstruction took precedence. Republicans controlled most Southern states, propped up by Republican-controlled Congress, northern money, and southern military occupation. Grant advocated the ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment that said states could not disenfranchise African Americans. Within a year, the three remaining states—Mississippi, Virginia, and Texas—adopted the new amendment—and were admitted to Congress. Grant put military pressure on Georgia to reinstate its black legislators and adopt the amendment. Georgia complied, and on February 24, 1871, its senators were seated in Congress, with all former Confederate states represented, the Union was completely restored under Grant. Under Grant, for the first time in history, Black-American men served in the United States Congress, all from the Southern states.

In 1870, to enforce Reconstruction, Congress and Grant created the Justice Department that allowed the Attorney General and the new Solicitor General to prosecute the Klan. Congress and Grant passed three Enforcement Acts, designed to protect black people and Reconstruction governments. Using the Enforcement Acts, Grant crushed the Klan. By October, Grant suspended habeas corpus in part of South Carolina and sent federal troops to help marshals, who initiated prosecutions. Grant's Attorney General, Amos T. Akerman, who replaced Hoar, was zealous to destroy the Klan. Akerman and South Carolina's U.S. marshal arrested over 470 Klan members, while hundreds of Klansmen, fled the state. By 1872, the Klan's power had collapsed, and African Americans voted in record numbers in the South. Attorney General George H. Williams, Akerman's replacement, suspended prosecutions of the Klan in 1873, but prior to the election of 1874, changed course and prosecuted the Klan.

During Grant's second term, the North retreated from Reconstruction, while southern conservatives called "Redeemers" formed armed groups, the Red Shirts and the White League, who openly used violence, intimidation, voter fraud, and racist appeals to overturn Republican rule. Northern apathy toward black people, the depressed economy and Grant's scandals made it politically difficult for the administration to maintain support for Reconstruction. Power shifted when the House was taken over by Democrats in the 1874 election. Grant ended the Brooks–Baxter War, bringing Reconstruction in Arkansas to a peaceful conclusion. He sent troops to New Orleans in the wake of the Colfax massacre and disputes over the election of Governor William Pitt Kellogg.

By 1875, Redeemer Democrats had taken control of all but three Southern states. As violence against black Southerners escalated, Grant's Attorney General Edwards Pierrepont told Republican Governor Adelbert Ames of Mississippi that the people were "tired of the autumnal outbreaks in the South", and declined to intervene directly. Grant later regretted not issuing a proclamation to help Ames, having been told Republicans in Ohio would bolt the party if he did. Grant told Congress in January 1875 he could not "see with indifference Union men or Republicans ostracized, persecuted, and murdered." Congress refused to strengthen the laws against violence but instead passed the sweeping Civil Rights Act of 1875 to guarantee black people access to public facilities. However, there was little enforcement and the Supreme Court ruled the law unconstitutional in 1883. In 1876, Grant dispatched troops to South Carolina to keep Republican Governor Daniel Henry Chamberlain in office. After Grant left office, the Compromise of 1877 meant Republicans obtained the White House for Rutherford B. Hayes in return for ending enforcement of racial equality for black people and removing federal troops from the South, marking the end of Reconstruction.

Financial affairs

Soon after taking office, Grant took conservative steps to return the economy to pre-war monetary standards. During the War, Congress had authorized the Treasury to issue banknotes that, unlike the rest of the currency, were not backed by gold or silver. These "greenbacks" were necessary to pay the war debts, but caused inflation and forced gold-backed money out of circulation. On March 18, 1869, Grant signed the Public Credit Act of 1869, which guaranteed bondholders would be repaid in "coin or its equivalent". The act committed the government to the full return of the gold standard within ten years. This followed a policy of "hard currency, economy and gradual reduction of the national debt." Grant's own ideas about the economy were simple, and he relied on the advice of businessmen.

Gold corner conspiracy

Further information: Black Friday (1869)
Photograph of the blackboard in the New York City Gold Room on Black Friday, showing the collapse of the price of gold

In April 1869, railroad tycoons Jay Gould and Jim Fisk conspired to corner the gold market in New York. They controlled the Erie Railroad, and a high gold price would allow foreign agriculture buyers to purchase exported crops, shipped east over the Erie's routes. Boutwell's policy of selling gold from the Treasury biweekly, however, kept gold artificially low. Unable to corrupt Boutwell, the schemers built a relationship with Grant's brother-in-law, Abel Corbin, and gained access to Grant. Gould bribed Assistant Treasurer Daniel Butterfield to gain inside information into the Treasury.

In July, Grant reduced the sale of Treasury gold to $2,000,000 per month. Fisk told Grant his gold selling policy would destroy the nation. By September, Grant, who was naive regarding finance, was convinced a low gold price would help farmers, and the sale of gold for September was not decreased. On September 23, when the gold price reached 143+1⁄8, Boutwell rushed to the White House and talked with Grant. On September 24, known as Black Friday, Grant ordered Boutwell to sell, whereupon Boutwell wired Butterfield to sell $4,000,000 in gold. The bull market at Gould's Gold Room collapsed, the price plummeted from 160 to 133+1⁄3, a bear market panic ensued, Gould and Fisk fled, and economic damages lasted months. By January 1870, the economy resumed its post-war recovery.

Foreign affairs

Grant had limited foreign policy experience, so relied heavily on his talented Secretary of State Hamilton Fish. Grant and Fish had cordial friendship. Besides Grant, the main players in foreign affairs were Fish and the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Charles Sumner. Sumner, who hated Grant, led the opposition to Grant's plan to annex Santo Domingo, despite fully supporting annexation of Alaska.

Grant had an expansionist impulse to protect American interests abroad and was a strong advocate of the Monroe Doctrine. For instance, when Tomás Frías became President of Bolivia in 1872, Grant stressed the importance of maintaining good relations between Bolivia and the US. He had an idealist side to his foreign policy. For instance, Grant appointed a Jewish lawyer, Benjamin F. Peixotto, U.S. Consul in Bucharest, in response to the Romanian persecution of Jews. Grant said that respect "for human rights is the first duty for those set as rulers" over the nations.

Formal photographic portrait of bearded man
Secretary of State Hamilton Fish and Grant successfully settled the Alabama Claims by treaty and arbitration.

Treaty of Washington (1871)

Main article: Treaty of Washington (1871)

The most pressing diplomatic problem in 1869 was the settlement of the Alabama Claims, depredations caused to Union merchant ships by the Confederate warship CSS Alabama, built in a British shipyard in violation of neutrality rules. Fish played the central role in formulating and implementing the Treaty of Washington and the Geneva arbitration (1872). Senator Charles Sumner led the demand for reparations, with talk of British Columbia as payment. Sumner, among other politicians, argued that British complicity in arms delivery to the Confederacy via blockade runners prolonged the war. Fish and Treasurer George Boutwell convinced Grant that peaceful relations with Britain were essential, and the two nations agreed to negotiate.

To avoid jeopardizing negotiations, Grant refrained from recognizing Cuban rebels who were fighting for independence from Spain, which would have been inconsistent with American objections to the British granting belligerent status to Confederates. A commission in Washington produced a treaty whereby an international tribunal would settle the damage amounts; the British admitted regret, but not fault. The Senate, including Grant critics Sumner and Carl Schurz, approved the Treaty of Washington, which settled disputes over fishing rights and maritime boundaries. The Alabama Claims settlement was Grant's most successful foreign policy achievement, securing peace with Great Britain. The settlement ($15,500,000) of the Alabama claims resolved troubled Anglo-American issues and turned Britain into America's strongest ally.

Korean expedition (1871)

Main article: United States expedition to Korea

In 1871, a U.S. expedition was sent to Korea to open up trade with a country which had a policy that excluded trading with foreign powers, and to learn the fate of U.S. merchant ship SS General Sherman, which had disappeared up the Taedong River in 1866. Grant dispatched a land and naval force consisting of five warships and over 1,200 men, under Admiral John Rodgers, to support a diplomatic delegation, led by US ambassador to China, Frederick Low, sent to negotiate trade and political relations.

On June 1, the American ships entered the Ganghwa Straits on the Han River and, as foreign ships were barred from entering the river, onshore Korean garrisons fired upon the ships, but little damage was done. When Rodgers demanded an apology and to begin treaty negotiations, the Korean government refused. On June 10, Rodgers destroyed several Korean forts, culminating in the Battle of Ganghwa, at which 250 Koreans were killed with a loss of 3 Americans. The expedition failed to open up trade and merely strengthened Korea's isolationist policy.

Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)

Main article: Proposed annexation of Santo Domingo
Santo Domingo City; watercolor by James E. Taylor, 1871

In 1869, Grant initiated his plan to annex the Dominican Republic, then called Santo Domingo. Grant believed acquisition would increase the United States' natural resources, and strengthen U.S. naval protection to enforce the Monroe Doctrine, safeguard against British obstruction of U.S. shipping and protect a future oceanic canal, stop slavery in Cuba and Brazil, while black people in the United States would have a safe haven from "the crime of Klu Kluxism".

Joseph W. Fabens, an American speculator who represented Buenaventura Báez, the president of the Dominican Republic, met with Secretary Fish and proposed annexation. On July 17, Grant sent a military aide Orville E. Babcock to evaluate the islands' resources, local conditions, and Báez's terms for annexation, but gave him no diplomatic authority. When Babcock returned to Washington with unauthorized annexation treaties, Grant pressured his cabinet to accept them. Grant ordered Fish to draw up formal treaties, sent to Báez by Babcock's return to the island nation. The Dominican Republic would be annexed for $1.5 million and Samaná Bay would be lease-purchased for $2 million. Generals D.B. Sackett and Rufus Ingalls accompanied Babcock. On November 29, President Báez signed the treaties. On December 21, the treaties were placed before Grant and his cabinet.

Grant's plan, however, was obstructed by Senator Charles Sumner. On December 31, Grant met with Sumner at Sumner's home to gain his support for annexation. Grant left confident that Sumner approved, but what Sumner actually said was disputed by various witnesses. Without appealing to the American public, Grant submitted the treaties on January 10, 1870, to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Sumner, for ratification, but Sumner shelved the bills. Prompted by Grant to stop stalling the treaties, Sumner's committee took action but rejected the bills by a 5-to-2 vote. Sumner opposed annexation and reportedly said the Dominicans were "a turbulent, treacherous race" in a closed session of the Senate. Sumner sent the treaties for a full Senate vote, while Grant personally lobbied other senators. Despite Grant's efforts, the Senate defeated the treaties.

Grant was outraged, and on July 1, 1870, he sacked his appointed Minister to Great Britain, John Lothrop Motley, Sumner's friend and ally. In January 1871, Grant signed a joint resolution to send a commission to investigate annexation. He chose three neutral parties, with Frederick Douglass to be secretary of the commission, that gave Grant the moral high ground from Sumner. Although the commission approved its findings, the Senate remained opposed, forcing Grant to abandon further efforts. Seeking retribution, in March 1871, Grant maneuvered to have Sumner deposed from his powerful Senate chairmanship. The stinging controversy over Santo Domingo overshadowed Grant's foreign diplomacy. Critics complained of Grant's reliance on military personnel to implement his policies.

Cuba and Virginius Affair

Main article: Virginius Affair

American policy under Grant was to remain neutral during the Ten Years' War (1868–78) in Cuba against Spanish rule. On the recommendation of Fish and Sumner, Grant refused to recognize the rebels, in effect endorsing Spanish colonial rule, while calling for the abolition of slavery in Cuba. This was done to protect American commerce and to keep peace with Spain.

This fragile policy was broken in October 1873, when a Spanish cruiser captured a merchant ship, Virginius, flying the U.S. flag, carrying supplies and men to aid the insurrection. Treating them as pirates, Spanish authorities executed 53 prisoners without trial, including eight Americans. American Captain Joseph Frye and his crew were executed and their bodies mutilated. Enraged Americans called for war with Spain. Grant ordered U.S. Navy Squadron warships to converge on Cuba. On November 27, Fish reached a diplomatic resolution in which Spain's president, Emilio Castelar y Ripoll, expressed his regret, surrendered the Virginius and the surviving captives. Spain paid $80,000 to the families of the executed Americans.

Free trade with Hawaii

Main article: Reciprocity Treaty of 1875
reception line
King Kalākaua of Hawaii meets President Grant at the White House on his state visit, 1874.

In the face of strong opposition from Democrats, Grant and Fish secured a free trade treaty in 1875 with Hawaii, incorporating its sugar industry into the U.S. economic sphere. To secure the agreement, King Kalākaua made a 91-day state visit, the first reigning monarch to set foot in the United States. Despite opposition from Southern Democrats, who wanted to protect American rice and sugar producers, and Democrats, who believed the treaty to be an island annexation attempt and referred to the Hawaiians as an "inferior" race, a bill implementing the treaty passed Congress.

The treaty gave free access to the U.S. market for sugar and other products grown in Hawaii from September 1876. The U.S. gained lands in the area known as Puʻu Loa for what would become known as the Pearl Harbor naval base. The treaty led to large investment by Americans in sugar plantations in Hawaii.

Federal Indian policy

Main article: Native American policy of the Ulysses S. Grant administration Further information: Black Hills Land Claim, Black Hills Gold Rush, and Great Sioux War
Formal photographic portrait of a sitting mustached man
Ely Samuel Parker, appointed by President Grant as the first Native American (Seneca) Commissioner of Indian Affairs

When Grant took office in 1869, the nation's more than 250,000 Native Americans were governed by 370 treaties. Grant's faith influenced his "peace" policy, believing that the "Creator" did not place races of men on earth for the "stronger" to destroy the "weaker". Grant was mostly an assimilationist, wanting Native Americans to adopt European customs, practices, and language, and accept democratic government, leading to eventual citizenship. At Grant's 1869 Inauguration, Grant said "I will favor any course towards them which tends to their civilization, Christianization and ultimate citizenship." Grant appointed Ely S. Parker, an assimilated Seneca and member of his wartime staff, as the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, the first Native American to serve in this position, surprising many.

In April 1869, Grant signed legislation establishing an unpaid Board of Indian Commissioners to reduce corruption and oversee the implementation of his "Peace" policy, aimed to replace entrepreneurs serving as Native American agents with missionaries and to protect Native Americans on reservations and educate them in farming.

In 1870, a setback in Grant's policy occurred over the Marias Massacre, causing public outrage. In 1871, Grant ended the sovereign tribal treaty system; by law individual Native Americans were deemed wards of the federal government. Grant's policy was undermined by Parker's resignation in 1871, denominational infighting among religious agents, and entrenched economic interests. Nonetheless, Indian wars declined overall during Grant's first term, and on October 1, 1872, Major General Oliver Otis Howard negotiated peace with the Apache leader Cochise. On December 28, 1872, another setback took place when General George Crook and the 5th Cavalry massacred about 75 Yavapai Apache Indians at Skeleton Cave, Arizona.

On April 11, 1873, Major General Edward Canby was killed in North California by Modoc leader Kintpuash. Grant ordered restraint. The army captured Kintpuash and his followers, who were convicted of Canby's murder and hanged on October 3, while the remaining Modoc were relocated to the Indian Territory. The beginning of the Indian Wars has been dated to this event.

In 1874, the army defeated the Comanche at the Battle of Palo Duro Canyon, forcing them to settle at the Fort Sill reservation in 1875. Grant pocket-vetoed a bill in 1874 protecting bison and instead supported Interior Secretary Columbus Delano, who correctly believed killing bison would force Plains Indians to abandon their nomadic lifestyle. In April 1875, another setback occurred: the U.S. Army massacred 27 Cheyenne Indians in Kansas.

With the lure of gold discovered in the Black Hills and the westward force of Manifest Destiny, white settlers trespassed on Sioux protected lands. Red Cloud reluctantly entered negotiations on May 26, 1875, but other Sioux chiefs readied for war. Grant told the Sioux leaders to make "arrangements to allow white persons to go into the Black Hills" and that their children would attend schools, speak English, and prepare "for the life of white men."

The Battle of the Little Big Horn, 1876

On November 3, 1875, under advice from Sheridan, Grant agreed not to enforce excluding miners from the Black Hills, forcing Native Americans onto the Sioux reservation. Sheridan told Grant that the U.S. Army was undermanned and the territory involved was vast, requiring many soldiers.

During the Great Sioux War that started after Sitting Bull refused to relocate to agency land, warriors led by Crazy Horse massacred George Armstrong Custer and his men at the Battle of the Little Big Horn. Angry white settlers demanded retribution. Grant castigated Custer in the press, saying "I regard Custer's massacre as a sacrifice of troops, brought on by Custer himself, that was wholly unnecessary." In September and October 1876, Grant persuaded the tribes to relinquish the Black Hills. Congress ratified the agreement three days before Grant left office in 1877.

In spite of Grant's peace efforts, over 200 battles were fought with Native Americans during his presidency. Grant's peace policy survived Custer's death, even after Grant left office in 1877; Indian policy remained under the Interior Department rather than the War Department. The policy was considered humanitarian for its time but later criticized for disregarding tribal cultures.

Election of 1872 and second term

Main article: 1872 United States presidential election
A Thomas Nast cartoon depicting Grant steering a ship and being challenged by opponents during the presidential election of 1872.
Cartoon by Thomas Nast on Grant's opponents in the reelection campaign

The Liberal Republicans—reformers, men who supported low tariffs, and those who opposed Grant's prosecution of the Klan—broke from Grant and the Republican Party. The Liberals disliked Grant's alliance with Senators Simon Cameron and Roscoe Conkling, considered to be spoilsmen politicians.

In 1872, the Liberals nominated Horace Greeley, a New York Tribune editor and enemy of Grant, for president, and Missouri governor B. Gratz Brown, for vice president. The Liberals denounced Grantism, corruption, and inefficiency, and demanded withdrawal of federal troops from the South, literacy tests for black voters, and amnesty for Confederates. The Democrats adopted the Greeley-Brown ticket and the Liberals party platform. Greeley pushed the themes that the Grant administration was failed and corrupt.

The Republicans nominated Grant for reelection, with Senator Henry Wilson of Massachusetts as the vice presidential nominee. The Republicans shrewdly borrowed from the Liberal platform, including "extended amnesty, lowered tariffs, and embraced civil service reform." Grant lowered customs duties, gave amnesty to Confederates, and implemented a civil service merit system, neutralizing the opposition. To placate the burgeoning suffragist movement, the Republican platform said women's rights would be treated with "respectful consideration." Concerning Southern policy, Greeley advocated that local government control be given to white people, while Grant advocated federal protection of black people. Grant was supported by Frederick Douglass, prominent abolitionists, and Indian reformers.

Grant won reelection easily thanks to federal prosecution of the Klan, a strong economy, debt reduction, and lowered tariffs and taxes. He received 56% of the vote and an Electoral College landslide (286 to 66). Most African Americans in the South voted for Grant, while Democratic opposition remained mostly peaceful. Grant lost in six former slave states that wanted an end to Reconstruction. He proclaimed the victory as a personal vindication, but felt betrayed by the Liberals.

Grant was sworn in by Salmon P. Chase on March 4, 1873. In his second inaugural address, he focused on what he considered the chief issues: freedom and fairness for all Americans and the benefits of citizenship for freed slaves. Grant concluded his address: "My efforts in the future will be directed towards the restoration of good feelings between the different sections of our common community". Wilson died in office on November 22, 1875. With Wilson's loss, Grant relied on Fish's guidance more than ever.

Panic of 1873 and loss of House

Grant signed the Coinage Act of 1873, effectively ending the legal basis for bimetallism. The Coinage Act discontinued the standard silver dollar and established the gold dollar as the monetary standard; because the gold supply did not increase as quickly as the population, the result was deflation. Silverites, who wanted more money in circulation to raise the prices farmers received, denounced the move as the "Crime of 1873", claiming deflation made debts more burdensome for farmers.

A cartoon depicting Grant after vetoing the Inflation bill.
Grant is congratulated for vetoing the "inflation bill" in 1874.

Economic turmoil renewed during Grant's second term. In September 1873, Jay Cooke & Company, a New York brokerage house, collapsed after it failed to sell all the bonds issued by Northern Pacific Railway. Other banks and brokerages that owned railroad stocks and bonds were ruined. Grant, who knew little about finance, traveled to New York to consult leading businessmen on how to resolve the crisis, which became known as the Panic of 1873. Grant believed that, as with the collapse of the Gold Ring in 1869, the panic was merely an economic fluctuation. He instructed the Treasury to buy $10 million in government bonds, which curbed the panic, but the Long Depression, swept the nation. Eighty-nine of the nation's 364 railroads went bankrupt.

In 1874, hoping inflation would stimulate the economy, Congress passed the Ferry Bill. Many farmers and workingmen favored the bill, which would have added $64 million in greenbacks to circulation, but some Eastern bankers opposed it because it would have weakened the dollar. Belknap, Williams, and Delano told Grant a veto would hurt Republicans in the November elections. Grant believed the bill would destroy the credit of the nation and vetoed it despite their objections. Grant's veto placed him in the Republican conservative faction and began the party's commitment to a gold-backed dollar. Grant later pressured Congress for a bill to strengthen the dollar by gradually reducing the greenbacks in circulation. When the Democrats gained a majority in the House after the 1874 elections, the lame-duck Republican Congress did so before the Democrats took office. On January 14, 1875, Grant signed the Specie Payment Resumption Act, which required reduction of greenbacks allowed to circulate and declared that they would be redeemed for gold beginning on January 1, 1879.

Reforms and scandals

Further information: Reforms of the Ulysses S. Grant administration and Scandals of the Ulysses S. Grant administration

The post-Civil War economy brought on massive industrial wealth and government expansion. Speculation, lifestyle extravagance, and corruption in federal offices were rampant. All of Grant's executive departments were investigated by Congress. Grant by nature was honest, trusting, gullible, and loyal to his friends. His responses to malfeasance were mixed: at times appointing cabinet reformers, others defending culprits.

Cartoonist Thomas Nast praises Grant for rejecting demands by Pennsylvania politicians to suspend civil service rules.

Grant in his first term appointed Secretary of Interior Jacob D. Cox, who implemented civil service reform, including firing unqualified clerks. On October 3, 1870, Cox resigned after a dispute with Grant over handling of a mining claim. Authorized by Congress on March 3, 1871, Grant created and appointed the first Civil Service Commission. Grant's Commission created rules for competitive exams for appointments, ending mandatory political assessments and classifying positions into grades.

In November 1871, Grant's appointed New York Collector, Thomas Murphy, resigned. Grant replaced him with Chester A. Arthur, who implemented Boutwell's reforms. A Senate committee investigated the New York Customs House in 1872. Previous Grant appointed collectors Murphy and Moses H. Grinnell charged lucrative fees for warehouse space, without the legal requirement of listing the goods. This led to Grant firing warehouse owner George K. Leet, for pocketing the exorbitant freight fees. Boutwell's reforms included stricter record-keeping and that goods be stored on company docks. Grant ordered prosecutions by Attorney General George H. Williams and Secretary of Treasury Boutwell of persons accepting and paying bribes.

On March 3, 1873, Grant signed into law an appropriation act that increased pay for federal employees, Congress (retroactive), the judiciary, and the president. Grant's annual salary doubled to $50,000. Critics derided Congress' two-year retroactive $4,000 payment for each Congressman, and the law was partially repealed. Grant kept his much-needed pay raise, while his reputation remained intact.

In 1872, Grant signed into law an act that ended private moiety (tax collection) contracts, but an attached rider allowed three more contracts. Boutwell's assistant secretary William A. Richardson hired John B. Sanborn to go after "individuals and cooperations" who allegedly evaded taxes. Sanborn aggressively collected $213,000, while splitting $156,000 to others, including Richardson, and the Republican Party campaign committee. During an 1874 Congressional investigation, Richardson denied involvement, but Sanborn said he met with Richardson over the contracts. Congress severely condemned Richardson's permissive manner. Grant appointed Richardson judge of the Court of Claims, and replaced him with reformer Benjamin Bristow. In June, Grant and Congress abolished the moiety system.

Bristow tightened up the Treasury's investigation force, implemented civil service, and fired hundreds of corrupt appointees. Bristow discovered Treasury receipts were low, and launched an investigation that uncovered the notorious Whiskey Ring, that involved collusion between distillers and Treasury officials to evade millions in taxes. In mid-April, Bristow informed Grant of the ring. On May 10, Bristow struck hard and broke the ring. Federal marshals raided 32 installations nationwide, leading to 110 convictions and $3,150,000 in fines.

"Uncle Sam" cartoon tapping a Louisville whiskey barrel, captioned "probe away"
Harper's Weekly
cartoon on Bristow's Whiskey Ring investigation

Grant appointed David Dyer, under Bristow's recommendation, federal attorney to prosecute the Ring in St. Louis, who indicted Grant's friend General John McDonald, supervisor of Internal Revenue. Grant endorsed Bristow's investigation, writing on a letter "Let no guilty man escape..." Bristow's investigation discovered Babcock received kickback payments, and that Babcock had secretly forewarned McDonald, the ring's mastermind, of the investigation. On November 22, the jury convicted McDonald. On December 9, Babcock was indicted; Grant refused to believe in Babcock's guilt and was ready to testify in Babcock's favor, but Fish warned that doing so would put Grant in the embarrassing position of testifying against a case prosecuted by his own administration. Instead, on February 12, 1876, Grant gave a deposition in Babcock's defense, expressing that his confidence in his secretary was "unshaken". Grant's testimony silenced all but his strongest critics.

The St. Louis jury acquitted Babcock, and Grant allowed him to remain at the White House. However, after Babcock was indicted in a frame-up of a Washington reformer, called the Safe Burglary Conspiracy, Grant dismissed him. Babcock kept his position of Superintendent of Public Buildings in Washington.

The Interior Department under Secretary Columbus Delano, whom Grant appointed to replace Cox, was rife with fraud and corruption. The exception was Delano's effective oversight of Yellowstone. Grant reluctantly forced Delano's resignation. Surveyor General Silas Reed had set up corrupt contracts that benefited Delano's son, John Delano. Grant's Secretary of Interior Zachariah Chandler, who succeeded Delano in 1875, implemented reforms, fired corrupt agents and ended profiteering. When Grant was informed by Postmaster Marshall Jewell of a potential Congressional investigation into an extortion scandal involving Attorney General George H. Williams' wife, Grant fired Williams and appointed reformer Edwards Pierrepont. Grant's new cabinet appointments temporarily appeased reformers.

After the Democrats took control of the House in 1875, more corruption in federal departments was exposed. Among the most damaging scandal involved Secretary of War William W. Belknap, who took quarterly kickbacks from the Fort Sill tradership; he resigned in February 1876. Belknap was impeached by the House but was acquitted by the Senate. Grant's brother Orvil set up "silent partnerships" and received kickbacks from four trading posts. Congress discovered that Secretary of Navy Robeson had been bribed by a naval contractor, but no articles of impeachment were drawn up. In his December 5, 1876, Annual Message, Grant apologized to the nation: "Failures have been errors of judgement, not of intent."

Election of 1876

Main article: 1876 United States presidential election

The abandonment of Reconstruction played a central role during the 1876 election. Mounting investigations into corruption by the House, controlled by the Democrats, discredited Grant's presidency. Grant did not run for a third term, while the Republicans chose Governor Rutherford B. Hayes of Ohio, a reformer, at their convention. The Democrats nominated Governor Samuel J. Tilden of New York. Voting irregularities in three Southern states caused the election to remain undecided for several months.

Grant told Congress to settle the matter through legislation and assured both sides that he would not use the army to force a result, except to curb violence. On January 29, 1877, he signed legislation forming an Electoral Commission, which ruled Hayes elected president; to forestall Democratic protests, Republicans agreed to the Compromise of 1877, in which the last troops were withdrawn from Southern capitals. With Reconstruction dead, 80 years of Jim Crow segregation was launched. Grant's "calm visage" throughout the election crisis appeased the nation.

Post-presidency (1877–1885)

Main article: Post-presidency of Ulysses S. Grant

After leaving the White House, Grant said he "was never so happy in my life". The Grants left Washington for New York, to attend the birth of their daughter Nellie's child. Calling themselves "waifs", the Grants toured Cincinnati, St. Louis, Chicago, and Galena, without a clear idea of where they would live.

World tour and diplomacy

Main article: World tour of Ulysses S. Grant
Map of Grant's world tour by J. S. Kemp, 1879

Using $25,000 (equivalent to $715,000 in 2023) from liquidating an investment in a Nevada-based mining company, the Grants set out on a world tour for approximately two and a half years. On May 16, Grant and his wife left for England aboard the SS Indiana. During the tour, the Grants made stops in Europe, Africa, India, the Middle East and the Far East, meeting with notable dignitaries such as Queen Victoria, Tsar Alexander II, Pope Leo XIII, Otto von Bismarck, Li Hongzhang, and Emperor Meiji.

As a courtesy to Grant by the Hayes administration, his touring party received federal transportation on three U.S. Navy ships: a five-month tour of the Mediterranean on the USS Vandalia, travel from Hong Kong to China on the USS Ashuelot, and from China to Japan on the USS Richmond. The Hayes administration encouraged Grant to assume a public unofficial diplomatic role and strengthen American interests abroad during the tour. Homesick, the Grants left Japan on the SS City of Tokio and landed in San Francisco on September 20, 1879, greeted by cheering crowds. Grant's tour demonstrated to Europe and Asia that the United States was an emerging world power.

Third term attempt

Main article: 1880 Republican National Convention
Grant, shown in a cartoon as an acrobat hanging from rings, holding up multiple politician/acrobats
Cartoonist Joseph Keppler lampooned Grant and his associates. Puck, 1880

Politically conservative, Grant was supported by the Stalwarts who, led by Grant's old political ally Roscoe Conkling, saw Grant's renewed popularity as an opportunity, and sought to nominate him for the presidency in 1880. Opponents called it a violation of the unofficial two-term rule in use since George Washington. Grant said nothing publicly but wanted the job and encouraged his men. Washburne urged him to run; Grant demurred. Even so, Conkling and John A. Logan began to organize delegates in Grant's favor. When the convention convened in Chicago in June, more delegates were pledged to Grant than to any other candidate, but he was still short of a majority vote.

At the convention, Conkling nominated Grant with an eloquent speech, the most famous line being "When asked which state he hails from, our sole reply shall be, he hails from Appomattox and its famous apple tree." With 378 votes needed for the nomination, the first ballot had Grant at 304, Blaine at 284, Sherman at 93, and the rest to minor candidates. After thirty-six ballots, Blaine's delegates combined with those of other candidates to nominate a compromise candidate: James A. Garfield. A procedural motion made the vote unanimous for Garfield. Grant gave speeches for Garfield but declined to criticize the Democratic nominee, Winfield Scott Hancock, a general who had served under him. Garfield won the election. Grant gave Garfield his public support and pushed him to include Stalwarts in his administration. On July 2, 1881, Garfield was shot by an assassin and died on September 19. On learning of Garfield's death from a reporter, Grant wept.

Business failures

In the 19th century, there were no federal presidential pensions, and the Grants' personal income was $6,000 a year. Grant's world tour had been costly, and he had depleted most of his savings. Wealthy friends bought him a house on Manhattan's Upper East Side, and to make an income, Grant, Jay Gould, and former Mexican Finance Secretary Matías Romero chartered the Mexican Southern Railroad, with plans to build a railroad from Oaxaca to Mexico City. Grant urged President Chester A. Arthur to negotiate a free trade treaty with Mexico. Arthur and the Mexican government agreed, but the United States Senate rejected the treaty in 1883. The railroad was similarly unsuccessful, falling into bankruptcy the following year.

At the same time, Grant's son Buck had opened a Wall Street brokerage house with Ferdinand Ward. A conniving man who swindled numerous wealthy men, Ward was at the time regarded as a rising star on Wall Street. The firm, Grant & Ward, was initially successful. In 1883, Grant joined the firm and invested $100,000 (~$2.78 million in 2023) of his own money. Ward paid investors abnormally high interest by pledging the company's securities on multiple loans in a process called rehypothecation (now regarded as a Ponzi scheme). Ward, in collusion with banker James D. Fish and kept secret from bank examiners, retrieved the firm's securities from the company's bank vault. When the trades went bad, multiple loans came due, all backed by the same collateral.

Historians agree that the elder Grant was likely unaware of Ward's intentions, but it is unclear how much Buck Grant knew. In May 1884, enough investments went bad to convince Ward that the firm would soon be bankrupt. Ward, who assumed Grant was "a child in business matters", told him of the impending failure, but assured Grant that this was a temporary shortfall. Grant approached businessman William Henry Vanderbilt, who gave him a personal loan of $150,000. Grant invested the money in the firm, but it was not enough to save it. The fall of Grant & Ward set off the Panic of 1884.

Vanderbilt offered to forgive Grant's debt entirely, but Grant refused. Impoverished but compelled by personal honor, he repaid what he could with his Civil War mementos and the sale or transfer of all other assets. Vanderbilt took title to Grant's home, although he allowed the Grants to continue to reside there, and pledged to donate the souvenirs to the federal government and insisted the debt had been paid in full. Grant was distraught over Ward's deception and asked privately how he could ever "trust any human being again." In March 1885, he testified against both Ward and Fish. After the collapse of Grant & Ward, there was an outpouring of sympathy for Grant.

Memoirs, military pension, illness and death

Main article: Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant
Grant sitting in a porch chair wrapped in blankets
Grant working on his memoirs, less than a month before his death

Grant attended a service for Civil War veterans in Ocean Grove, New Jersey, on August 4, 1884, receiving a standing ovation from the ten thousand attendees; it would be his last public appearance. In the summer of 1884, Grant complained of a sore throat but put off seeing a doctor until late October, when he learned it was cancer, possibly caused by his frequent cigar smoking. Grant chose not to reveal the seriousness of his condition to his wife, who soon found out from Grant's doctor. In March 1885, The New York Times announced that Grant was dying of cancer, causing nationwide public concern. Knowing of Grant and Julia's financial difficulties, Congress restored him to the rank of General of the Army with full retirement pay—Grant's assumption of the presidency had required that he resign his commission and forfeit his (and his widow's) pension.

Grant was nearly penniless and worried about leaving his wife money to live on. He approached The Century Magazine and wrote a number of articles on his Civil War campaigns for $500 (equivalent to $17,000 in 2023) each. The articles were well received by critics, and the editor, Robert Underwood Johnson, suggested that Grant write a memoir, as Sherman and others had done. The magazine offered him a book contract with a 10% royalty. However, Grant's friend Mark Twain, one of the few who understood Grant's precarious financial condition, offered him an unheard-of 70% royalty. To provide for his family, Grant worked intensely on his memoirs in New York City. His former staff member Adam Badeau assisted with the research, while his son Frederick located documents and did much of the fact-checking. Because of the summer heat and humidity, his doctors recommended that he move upstate to a cottage at the top of Mount McGregor, offered by a family friend.

On July 18, 1885, Grant finished his memoir, which includes the events of his life to the end of the Civil War. The Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant was a critical and commercial success. Julia Grant eventually received about $450,000 in royalties (equivalent to $15,300,000 in 2023). The memoir has been highly regarded by the public, military historians, and literary critics. Grant portrayed himself as an honorable Western hero, whose strength lies in his honesty. He candidly depicted his battles against both the Confederates and internal army foes.

Drawing of a steam engine and train approaching station with an honor guard at attention
Grant's funeral train at West Point

Grant died in the Mount McGregor cottage on July 23, 1885. Sheridan, then Commanding General of the Army, ordered a day-long tribute to Grant on all military posts, and President Grover Cleveland ordered a thirty-day nationwide period of mourning. After private services, the honor guard placed Grant's body on a funeral train, which traveled to West Point and New York City. A quarter of a million people viewed it in the two days before the funeral. Tens of thousands of men, many of them veterans from the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR), marched with Grant's casket drawn by two dozen black stallions to Riverside Park in Morningside Heights, Manhattan. His pallbearers included Union generals Sherman and Sheridan, Confederate generals Simon Bolivar Buckner and Joseph E. Johnston, Admiral David Dixon Porter, and Senator John A. Logan, the head of the GAR. Following the casket in the seven-mile-long (11 km) procession were President Cleveland, two former living presidents Hayes and Arthur, all of the president's cabinet, and justices of the Supreme Court.

Attendance at the New York funeral topped 1.5 million. Ceremonies were held in other major cities around the country, while Grant was eulogized in the press. Grant's body was laid to rest in Riverside Park, first in a temporary tomb, and then on April 17, 1897, in the General Grant National Memorial, known as "Grant's Tomb", the largest mausoleum in North America.

Historical reputation

Main article: Historical reputation of Ulysses S. Grant See also: List of memorials to Ulysses S. Grant and Cultural depictions of Ulysses S. Grant
Neoclassical structure with dome
Grant's Tomb at dusk, 2016

Grant was hailed across the North as the General who "saved the Union" and overall his military reputation has held up well. Achieving great national fame for his victories at Vicksburg and the surrender at Appomattox, Grant was the most successful general, Union or Confederate, in the American Civil War. He was criticized by the South for using excessive force, and his drinking was often exaggerated by the press and stereotyped by rivals and critics. Historians also debate how effective Grant was at halting corruption. The scandals during his administration stigmatized his political reputation.

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Grant's reputation was damaged by the "Lost Cause" movement and the Dunning School. Views of Grant reached new lows as he was seen as an unsuccessful president and an unskilled, if lucky, general. In the 1950s, some historians reassessed Grant's military career, shifting the analysis of Grant as the victor by brute force to that of skillful modern strategist and commander. Historian William S. McFeely's biography, Grant (1981), won the Pulitzer Prize, and brought renewed scholarly interest in Grant. McFeely believed Grant was an "ordinary American" trying to "make his mark" during the 19th century. In the 21st century, Grant's reputation improved markedly among historians after the publication of Grant (2001), by historian Jean Edward Smith. Opinions of Grant's presidency demonstrate a better appreciation of Grant's personal integrity, Reconstruction efforts, and peace policy towards Indians, even when they fell short. H. W. Brands' The Man Who Saved the Union (2012), Ronald C. White's American Ulysses (2016), and Ron Chernow's Grant (2017) continued the elevation of Grant's reputation. White said that Grant "demonstrated a distinctive sense of humility, moral courage, and determination", and as president he "stood up for African Americans, especially fighting against voter suppression perpetrated by the Ku Klux Klan". White believed that Grant was "an exceptional person and leader". Historian Robert Farley writes that the "Cult of Lee" and the Dunning School's resentment of Grant for his defeat of Lee and his strong enforcement of Reconstruction resulted in Grant's shoddy treatment by historians.

In a 2021 C-SPAN survey ranking presidents from worst to best, Grant was ranked 20 out of 44 presidents, up from his previous ranking of 33 in 2017. This was due to the rehabilitation of his image and legacy in recent years, with Grant now receiving "more credit for Reconstruction and his diplomacy than condemnation for his alleged corruption."

Dates of rank

Insignia Rank Date Component
No insignia Cadet, USMA July 1, 1839 Regular Army
Brevet Second Lieutenant July 1, 1843 Regular Army
Second Lieutenant September 30, 1845 Regular Army
Brevet First Lieutenant September 8, 1847 Regular Army
First Lieutenant September 16, 1847 Regular Army
Captain August 5, 1853 Regular Army
(resigned July 31, 1854)
Colonel June 17, 1861 Volunteers
Brigadier General August 7, 1861 Volunteers
(to rank from May 17, 1861)
Major General February 16, 1862 Volunteers
Major General July 4, 1863 Regular Army
Lieutenant General March 4, 1864 Regular Army
General of the Army July 25, 1866 Regular Army
No insignia General of the Armies April 19, 2024 (posthumous) Regular Army
Sources:

See also

Notes

  1. Pronounced /ˈhaɪrəm juːˈlɪsiːz/ HY-rəm yoo-LISS-eez
  2. One source states Hamer took the "S" from Simpson, Grant's mother's maiden name. According to Grant, the "S." did not stand for anything. Upon graduation from the academy he adopted the name "Ulysses S. Grant". Another version of the story states that Grant inverted his first and middle names to register at West Point as "Ulysses Hiram Grant" as he thought reporting to the academy with a trunk that carried the initials H.U.G. would subject him to teasing and ridicule. Upon finding that Hamer had nominated him as "Ulysses S. Grant." Grant decided to keep the name so that he could avoid the "hug" monogram; and it was easier to keep the wrong name than to try changing school records.
  3. At the time, class ranking largely determined branch assignments. Those at the top of the class were usually assigned to the Engineers, followed by Artillery, Cavalry, and Infantry.
  4. Several scholars, including Jean Edward Smith and Ron Chernow, state that Longstreet was Grant's best man and the two other officers were Grant's groomsmen. All three went on to serve in the Confederate Army and surrendered to Grant at Appomattox.
  5. William McFeely said that Grant left the army simply because he was "profoundly depressed" and that the evidence as to how much and how often Grant drank remains elusive. Jean Edward Smith maintains Grant's resignation was too sudden to be a calculated decision. Buchanan never mentioned it again until asked about it during the Civil War. The effects and extent of Grant's drinking on his military and public career are debated by historians. Lyle Dorsett said Grant was an "alcoholic" but functioned amazingly well. William Farina maintains Grant's devotion to family kept him from drinking to excess and sinking into debt.
  6. The April 6th fighting had been costly, with thousands of casualties. That evening, heavy rain set in. Sherman found Grant standing alone under a tree in the rain. "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day of it, haven't we?" Sherman said. "Yes," replied Grant. "Lick 'em tomorrow, though."
  7. Smuggling of cotton was rampant, while the price of cotton skyrocketed. Grant believed the smuggling funded the Confederacy and provided them with military intelligence.
  8. In 2012, historian Jonathan D. Sarna said: "Gen. Ulysses S. Grant issued the most notorious anti-Jewish official order in American history." Grant made amends with the Jewish community during his presidency, appointing them to various federal positions. In 2017, biographer Ron Chernow said of Grant: "As we shall see, Grant as president atoned for his action in a multitude of meaningful ways. He was never a bigoted, hate-filled man and was haunted by his terrible action for the rest of his days."
  9. Attending Lincoln's funeral on April 19, Grant stood alone and wept openly; he later said Lincoln was "the greatest man I have ever known".
  10. Southern Reconstructed states were controlled locally by Republican carpetbaggers, scalawags and former slaves. By 1877, the conservative Democrats had full control of the region and Reconstruction was dead.
  11. To placate the South in 1870, Grant signed the Amnesty Act, which restored political rights to former Confederates.
  12. Additionally, Grant's Postmaster General, John Creswell used his patronage powers to integrate the postal system and appointed a record number of African-American men and women as postal workers across the nation, while also expanding many of the mail routes. Grant appointed Republican abolitionist and champion of black education Hugh Lennox Bond as U.S. Circuit Court judge.
  13. An 1870 Congressional investigation chaired by James A. Garfield cleared Grant of profiteering, but excoriated Gould and Fisk for their manipulation of the gold market and Corbin for exploiting his personal connection to Grant.
  14. Urged by his Secretary of War Rawlins, Grant initially supported recognition of Cuban belligerency, but Rawlins's death on September 6, 1869, removed any cabinet support for military intervention.
  15. Details revealed of the 1867 Crédit Mobilier bribery scandal, implicating both Colfax and Wilson, stung the Grant administration, but Grant was not connected to the corruption.
  16. The day after his inauguration, Grant wrote a letter to Colfax expressing his faith and trust in Colfax's integrity and allowed him to publish the letter, but the effort only served to compromise Grant's reputation.
  17. When Congress failed to make the Commission's reform rules permanent, Grant dissolved the Commission in 1874.

References

  1. Utter 2015, p. 141.
  2. Brands 2012a, p. 636.
  3. Hesseltine 1957, p. 4.
  4. McFeely 1981, pp. 5–6; White 2016, pp. 8–9.
  5. Simpson 2014, pp. 2–3; White 2016, pp. 9–10.
  6. Longacre 2006, pp. 6–7.
  7. McFeely 1981, p. 497; White 2016, pp. 16, 18.
  8. McFeely 1981, pp. 8, 10, 140–141; White 2016, p. 21.
  9. Brands 2012a, p. 8; White 2016, p. 19.
  10. Longacre 2006, pp. 6–7; Waugh 2009, p. 14.
  11. Simpson 2014, pp. 2–3; Longacre 2006, pp. 6–7.
  12. Waugh 2009, p. 14.
  13. Chernow 2017, pp. 99–100.
  14. White 2016, pp. 24–25.
  15. Simon 1967, p. 4.
  16. McFeely 1981, p. 12; Smith 2001, pp. 24, 83; Simon 1967, pp. 3–4.
  17. Garland 1898, pp. 30–31.
  18. McFeely 1981, p. 12; Smith 2001, pp. 24, 83; Simon 1967, pp. 3–4; Kahan 2018, p. 2.
  19. White 2016, p. 30.
  20. Simpson 2014, p. 13–14; Smith 2001, pp. 26–28.
  21. McFeely 1981, p. 10.
  22. Smith 2001, p. 27; McFeely 1981, pp. 16–17.
  23. McFeely 1981, pp. 16–17; Smith 2001, pp. 26–27.
  24. White 2016, p. 41.
  25. Brands 2012a, pp. 12–13.
  26. Chernow 2017, p. 27; Longacre 2006, p. 21; Cullum 1850, pp. 256–257.
  27. Chernow 2017, p. 28; McFeely 1981, pp. 16, 19.
  28. Jones 2011, p. 1580.
  29. Smith 2001, pp. 28–29; Brands 2012a, p. 15; Chernow 2017, p. 81.
  30. Smith 2001, pp. 28–29.
  31. ^ Smith 2001, pp. 30–33.
  32. Chernow 2017, pp. 61–62; White 2016, p. 102; Waugh 2009, p. 33.
  33. Chernow 2017, p. 62; Smith 2001, p. 73; Flood 2005, p. 2007.
  34. Chernow 2017, p. 62.
  35. Smith 2001, pp. 73–74; Waugh 2009, p. 33; Chernow 2017, p. 62; White 2016, p. 102.
  36. Smith 2001, p. 73.
  37. Simpson 2014, p. 49.
  38. Smith 2001, pp. 35–37; Brands 2012a, pp. 15–17.
  39. McFeely 1981, pp. 30–31; Brands 2012a, p. 23.
  40. ^ White 2016, p. 80.
  41. McFeely 1981, pp. 33–34; Brands 2012a, p. 37.
  42. McFeely 1981, pp. 34–35.
  43. Brands 2012a, pp. 41–42.
  44. ^ McFeely 1981, p. 36.
  45. White 2016, p. 66; Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War 2013, p. 271.
  46. Simpson 2014, p. 44; Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War 2013, p. 271.
  47. Smith 2001, pp. 67–68, 70, 73; Brands 2012a, pp. 49–52.
  48. White 2016, p. 75.
  49. Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War 2013, p. 271.
  50. Simpson 2014, p. 458; Chernow 2017, p. 58.
  51. McFeely 1981, pp. 30–31, 37–38.
  52. White 2016, pp. 85, 96; Chernow 2017, p. 46.
  53. Chernow 2017, p. 65.
  54. ^ Smith 2001, p. 76–78; Chernow 2017, pp. 73–74.
  55. Chernow 2017, p. 74.
  56. Smith 2001, p. 78; Chernow 2017, p. 75.
  57. McFeely 1981; Chernow 2017.
  58. White 2016, p. 487; Chernow 2017, p. 78.
  59. McFeely 1981, p. 52; Cullum 1891, p. 171; Chernow 2017, p. 81.
  60. Chernow 2017, pp. 81–83.
  61. McFeely 1981, p. 55; Chernow 2017, pp. 84–85.
  62. Chernow 2017, p. 85.
  63. Cullum 1891, p. 171; Chernow 2017, pp. 84–85.
  64. Cullum 1891, p. 171; Chernow 2017, pp. 85–86.
  65. McFeely 1981, p. 55.
  66. Smith 2001, p. 87.
  67. Smith 2001, p. 88.
  68. Farina 2007, p. 202.
  69. Farina 2007, pp. 13, 202; Dorsett 1983.
  70. Smith 2001, pp. 86–87; White 2016, pp. 118–120; McFeely 1981, p. 55.
  71. Longacre 2006, pp. 55–58.
  72. Smith 2001, pp. 87–88; Lewis 1950, pp. 328–332.
  73. Brands 2012a, pp. 77–78.
  74. Chernow 2017, pp. 95, 106; Simon 2002, p. 242; McFeely 1981, p. 60–61; Brands 2012a, pp. 94–96.
  75. McFeely 1981, pp. 58–60; White 2016, p. 125.
  76. McFeely 1981, p. 61.
  77. McFeely 1981, pp. 58–60; Chernow 2017, p. 94.
  78. Brands 2012a, p. 96.
  79. White 2016, p. 128.
  80. McFeely 1981, p. 62; Brands 2012a, p. 86; White 2016, p. 128.
  81. Brands 2012a; White 2016.
  82. Smith 2001, pp. 94–95; White 2016, p. 130.
  83. Brands 2012a, pp. 86–87.
  84. Smith 2001, pp. 94–95; McFeely 1981, p. 69; White 2016, p. 130.
  85. McFeely 1981, p. 64; Brands 2012a, pp. 89–90; White 2016, pp. 129–131.
  86. White 2016, p. 131; Simon 1969, pp. 4–5.
  87. McFeely 1981, pp. 65–66; White 2016, pp. 133, 136.
  88. White 2016, pp. 135–37.
  89. White 2016, p. 140.
  90. Brands 2012a, p. 121.
  91. Smith 2001, p. 99.
  92. White 2016, pp. 140–43; Brands 2012a, pp. 121–22; McFeely 1981, p. 73; Bonekemper 2012, p. 17; Smith 2001, p. 99; Chernow 2017, p. 125.
  93. Brands 2012a, p. 123.
  94. Brands 2012a, pp. 122–123; McFeely 1981, p. 80; Bonekemper 2012.
  95. "Battle Unit Details - the Civil War". U.S. National Park Service.
  96. Flood 2005, pp. 45–46; Smith 2001, p. 113; Bonekemper 2012, pp. 18–20.
  97. Bonekemper 2012, p. 21.
  98. Smith 2001, pp. 117–18; Bonekemper 2012, p. 21.
  99. White 2016, p. 159; Bonekemper 2012, p. 21.
  100. Flood 2005, p. 63; White 2016, p. 159; Bonekemper 2012, p. 21.
  101. McFeely 1981, p. 91; Chernow 2017, pp. 153–155.
  102. ^ White 2016, p. 168.
  103. White 2016, pp. 169–171.
  104. White 2016, p. 172.
  105. White 2016, pp. 172–173; Groom 2012, pp. 94, 101–103.
  106. McFeely 1981, pp. 92–94.
  107. White 2016, p. 168; McFeely 1981, p. 94.
  108. Smith 2001, pp. 138–142; Groom 2012, pp. 101–103.
  109. Smith 2001, p. 146.
  110. Axelrod 2011, p. 210.
  111. Smith 2001, pp. 141–164; Brands 2012a, pp. 164–165.
  112. Groom 2012, pp. 138, 143–144.
  113. Brands 2012a, pp. 164–165; Smith 2001, pp. 125–134.
  114. White 2016, p. 210; Barney 2011, p. 287.
  115. McFeely 1981, pp. 111–112; Groom 2012, p. 63; White 2016, p. 211.
  116. Groom 2012, pp. 62–65; McFeely 1981, p. 112.
  117. McFeely 1981, p. 111; Bonekemper 2012, pp. 51, 94; Barney 2011, p. 287.
  118. White 2016, pp. 217–218.
  119. Bonekemper 2012, pp. 51, 58–59, 63–64.
  120. McFeely 1981, p. 114; Flood 2005, pp. 109, 112; Bonekemper 2012, pp. 51, 58–59, 63–64.
  121. Chernow 2017, p. 205.
  122. Bonekemper 2012, pp. 59, 63–64; Smith 2001, p. 206.
  123. McFeely 1981, p. 115–16.
  124. McFeely 1981, p. 115.
  125. Brands 2012a, pp. 187–88.
  126. Bonekemper 2012, p. 94; White 2016, p. 221.
  127. White 2016, pp. 223–224.
  128. Kaplan 2015, pp. 1109–1119; White 2016, pp. 223–225.
  129. Brands 2012a, pp. 188–191; White 2016, pp. 230–231.
  130. White 2016, pp. 225–226.
  131. Smith 2001, p. 204; Barney 2011, p. 289.
  132. White 2016, p. 229.
  133. White 2016, p. 230; Groom 2012, pp. 363–364.
  134. Longacre 2006, p. 137; White 2016, p. 231.
  135. Brands 2012a, pp. 211–212.
  136. Badeau 1887, p. 126.
  137. Flood 2005, p. 133.
  138. White 2016, p. 243; Miller 2019, p. xii; Chernow 2017, p. 236.
  139. Brands 2012a, pp. 221–223; Catton 2005, p. 112; Chernow 2017, pp. 236–237.
  140. Flood 2005, pp. 147–148; White 2016, p. 246; Chernow 2017, pp. 238–239.
  141. White 2016, p. 248; Chernow 2017, pp. 231–232.
  142. Chernow 2017, p. 239.
  143. Catton 2005, pp. 119, 291; White 2016, pp. 248–249; Chernow 2017, pp. 239–241.
  144. Bonekemper 2012, pp. 147–148.
  145. Miller 2019, p. 248.
  146. Smith 2001, p. 244.
  147. Miller 2019, pp. 206–207.
  148. Miller 2019, pp. 206–209.
  149. Miller 2019, pp. 209–210.
  150. White 2016; Miller 2019, p. 154–155.
  151. Smith 2001, p. 225; White 2016, pp. 235–36.
  152. ^ Chernow 2017, p. 232.
  153. Flood 2005, pp. 143–144, 151; Sarna 2012a, p. 37; White 2016, pp. 235–236.
  154. Miller 2019, p. 259.
  155. Chernow 2017, pp. 232–33; Howland 1868, pp. 123–24.
  156. Brands 2012a, p. 218; Shevitz 2005, p. 256.
  157. Sarna 2012b.
  158. Sarna 2012a, pp. 89, 147; White 2016, p. 494; Chernow 2017, p. 236.
  159. Chernow 2017, p. 236.
  160. Smith 2001, pp. 226–227.
  161. Bonekemper 2012, pp. 148–149.
  162. White 2016, p. 269.
  163. Brands 2012a, pp. 226–228.
  164. Flood 2005, p. 160.
  165. Flood 2005, pp. 164–165.
  166. Smith 2001, p. 231.
  167. ^ McFeely 1981, p. 136.
  168. McFeely 1981, pp. 122–138; Smith 2001, pp. 206–257.
  169. Catton 1968, p. 8.
  170. Catton 1968, p. 7.
  171. Brands 2012a, p. 265; Cullum 1891, p. 172; White 2016, p. 295.
  172. Flood 2005, p. 196.
  173. McFeely 1981, pp. 145–147; Smith 2001, pp. 267–268; Brands 2012a, pp. 267–268.
  174. Flood 2005, pp. 214–215.
  175. Flood 2005, p. 216.
  176. Flood 2005, pp. 217–218.
  177. McFeely 1981, pp. 148–150.
  178. Flood 2005, p. 232; McFeely 1981, p. 148; Cullum 1891, p. 172.
  179. White 2016, pp. 313, 319.
  180. Chernow 2017, pp. 339, 342.
  181. Chernow 2017, pp. 343–44, 352.
  182. McFeely 1981, p. 156; Chernow 2017, p. 352.
  183. Wheelan 2014, p. 20; Simon 2002, p. 243; Chernow 2017, pp. 356–357.
  184. Catton 2005, pp. 190, 193; Wheelan 2014, p. 20; Chernow 2017, pp. 348, 356–357.
  185. McFeely 1981, p. 157; Wheelan 2014, p. 20; Chernow 2017, p. 356–357.
  186. McFeely 1981, pp. 157–175; Smith 2001, pp. 313–339, 343–368; Wheelan 2014, p. 20; Chernow 2017, pp. 356–57.
  187. Chernow 2017, p. 355.
  188. Chernow 2017, p. 378.
  189. Chernow 2017, pp. 396–97.
  190. Smith 2001, pp. 303, 314; Chernow 2017, pp. 376–77.
  191. Smith 2001, p. 314; Chernow 2017, pp. 376–77.
  192. Chernow 2017, pp. 378–79, 384; Bonekemper 2012, p. 463.
  193. McFeely 1981, p. 165.
  194. Chernow 2017, pp. 385–87, 394–95; Bonekemper 2012, p. 463.
  195. Chernow 2017, pp. 389, 392–95.
  196. McFeely 1981, p. 169.
  197. Chernow 2017, pp. 403–04; Bonekemper 2011.
  198. McFeely 1981, pp. 170–171; Furgurson 2007, p. 235; Chernow 2017, p. 403.
  199. Chernow 2017, p. 403.
  200. Furgurson 2007, pp. 120–21.
  201. Chernow 2017, pp. 403–04.
  202. Bonekemper 2011, pp. 41–42.
  203. Chernow 2017, pp. 406–07.
  204. Bonekemper 2010, p. 182; Chernow 2017, p. 407.
  205. McFeely 1981, pp. 157–175; Smith 2001, pp. 313–339, 343–368.
  206. McFeely 1981, pp. 178–186.
  207. Chernow 2017, p. 414; White 2016, pp. 369–370.
  208. ^ Catton 1968, p. 309.
  209. Chernow 2017, p. 429.
  210. Catton 1968, p. 324.
  211. Chernow 2017, p. 398.
  212. McFeely 1981, p. 179; Smith 2001, pp. 369–395; Catton 1968, pp. 308–309.
  213. Catton 1968, p. 325.
  214. Chernow 2017, p. 430.
  215. Catton 2005, pp. 223, 228; Smith 2001, p. 387.
  216. Catton 2005, p. 235; Smith 2001, pp. 388–389.
  217. Smith 2001, pp. 388–389.
  218. Smith 2001, pp. 389–390.
  219. Smith 2001, p. 390.
  220. Bonekemper 2012, p. 359.
  221. Bonekemper 2012, p. 353.
  222. Bonekemper 2012, pp. 365–366.
  223. White 2016, pp. 403–404.
  224. Smith 2001, pp. 401–403.
  225. Chernow 2017, p. 504; Smith 2001, pp. 401–03.
  226. White 2016, p. 405.
  227. Smith 2001.
  228. White 2016, pp. 405–406.
  229. Goethals 2015, p. 92; Smith 2001, p. 405.
  230. White 2016, p. 407.
  231. McFeely 1981, pp. 212, 219–220; Catton 2005, p. 304; Chernow 2017, p. 510.
  232. McFeely 1981, p. 224; White 2016, p. 412.
  233. Brands 2012a, pp. 375–376.
  234. ^ Smith 2001, pp. 409–412.
  235. McFeely 1981, pp. 227–229; White 2016, p. 414.
  236. Brands 2012a, pp. 410–411; Chernow 2017, pp. 556–557.
  237. White 2016, p. 418.
  238. Smith 2001, pp. 417–418.
  239. McFeely 1981, pp. 232–233.
  240. Smith 2001, p. 434n.
  241. Calhoun 2017, p. 10.
  242. Simpson 1988, pp. 433–434.
  243. Smith 2001, p. 420; McFeely 1981, pp. 238–241.
  244. Brands 2012a, p. 390.
  245. Chernow 2017, pp. 565–566.
  246. McFeely 1981, pp. 240–241; Smith 2001, pp. 420–421; Chernow 2017, pp. 565–566; Simpson 1988, p. 439.
  247. ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 533–534.
  248. ^ Chernow 2017, p. 569.
  249. Brands 2012a, p. 396; Simon 2002, p. 244.
  250. Brands 2012a, pp. 397–398.
  251. Smith 2001, pp. 432–433; Simon 2002, p. 244.
  252. Smith 2001, p. 438; Simon 2002, p. 244.
  253. Simon 2002, p. 244; Chernow 2017, pp. 594–95.
  254. White 2016, p. 453.
  255. Chernow 2017, p. 603.
  256. Calhoun 2017, pp. 35–36.
  257. White 2016, pp. 454–455; Simon 2002, pp. 244.
  258. Simon 2002, p. 244; Chernow 2017, p. 611.
  259. White 2016, pp. 458–59; Simon 2002, p. 244.
  260. Simon 2002, p. 244.
  261. Simon 2002, p. 244; Chernow 2017, p. 614.
  262. Peters, Gerhard; Woolley, John T. (2018a). "Republican Party Platform of 1868". The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara.
  263. Peters, Gerhard; Woolley, John T. (2018b). "Democratic Party Platform of 1868". The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara.
  264. Simon 2002, pp. 244–45.
  265. Calhoun 2017, p. 46.
  266. McFeely 1981, pp. 264–267.
  267. Smith 2001, pp. 459–460.
  268. Smith 2001, pp. 468–469.
  269. Smith 2001, p. 461.
  270. Simon 2002, p. 245.
  271. Calhoun 2017, p. 55.
  272. Foner 2014, pp. 243–44.
  273. McFeely 1981, p. 284; Smith 2001, p. 461; White 2016, p. 471.
  274. White 2016, p. 472.
  275. Patrick 1968, p. 166; McFeely 1981, p. 305; Simon 2002, pp. 246, 250.
  276. Smith 2001, pp. 465–466; White 2016, pp. 475, 530; Chernow 2017, pp. 635–636; Simon 2002, p. 246.
  277. ^ Simon 2002, pp. 246–47.
  278. White 2016, pp. 507, 564; Simon 2002, pp. 246–247.
  279. Kahan 2018, p. 45.
  280. Kahan 2018, p. 48.
  281. Chernow 2017, p. 628; Simon 2002, pp. 246–247; Kahan 2018, p. 48.
  282. Smith 2001, pp. 446, 469–470; Kahan 2018, pp. 47–48.
  283. White 2016, pp. 474–75.
  284. Smith 2001, p. 472; White 2016, pp. 474–475.
  285. Calhoun 2017, p. 376.
  286. Chernow 2017, pp. 749–50; Kahan 2018, p. xii; Calhoun 2017, pp. 384–85.
  287. Kahan 2018, p. 76; Chernow 2017, pp. 643–44; Sarna 2012a, pp. ix–xiv.
  288. Calhoun 2017, p. 512.
  289. Calhoun 2017, pp. 512–513; Smith 2001, p. 570.
  290. Calhoun 2017, p. 513.
  291. The New York Times 1871; Ertman 2010; Kahan 2018, p. 301.
  292. ^ Kahan 2018, p. 132.
  293. Carpenter 2001, pp. 84–85.
  294. ^ Kahan 2018, p. 61.
  295. Scher 2015, p. 83; Simon 2002, p. 247.
  296. Simon 2002.
  297. Brands 2012a, pp. 435, 465; Chernow 2017, pp. 686–87; Simon 2002, p. 247.
  298. Brands 2012a, p. 465.
  299. Simon 2002, pp. 247–48.
  300. Simon 2002, p. 246.
  301. Black-American Members by Congress, 1870–Present Access Date November 10, 2021
  302. Smith 2001, pp. 543–45; Brands 2012a, p. 474.
  303. Kahan 2018, pp. 64–65; Calhoun 2017, pp. 317–319.
  304. Foner 2019, pp. 119–21.
  305. Simon 2002, p. 248.
  306. Kahan 2018, p. 66.
  307. Smith 2001, p. 547; Calhoun 2017, p. 324.
  308. Kahan 2018, pp. 67–68.
  309. Smith 2001, pp. 547–48.
  310. Osborne, John M.; Bombaro, Christine (2015). "Forgotten Abolitionist: John A. J. Creswell of Maryland" (PDF). Dickinson College. Archived from the original on January 18, 2017. Retrieved January 21, 2017.
  311. Chernow 2017, p. 629.
  312. Chernow 2017, p. 628.
  313. Kahan 2018, p. 122.
  314. Richter 2012, pp. 72, 527–528, 532; Kahan 2018, pp. 121–122.
  315. Smith 2001, pp. 552–53; Kahan 2018, pp. 121–22.
  316. Brands 2012a, pp. 538–41; Foner 2014, p. 528.
  317. Brands 2012a, p. 553.
  318. McFeely 1981, pp. 420–22.
  319. Chernow 2017, pp. 816–17.
  320. Brands 2012a, p. 552.
  321. McFeely 1981, pp. 418–19.
  322. McFeely 1981, pp. 418–19; Franklin 1974, p. 235.
  323. Brands 2012a, p. 570.
  324. Smith 2001, pp. 603–04; Sproat 1974, pp. 163–65; Calhoun 2017, pp. 561–62.
  325. Chernow 2017, pp. 853–54; Smith 2001, pp. 603–04; Sproat 1974, pp. 163–65.
  326. ^ Simon 2002, p. 249.
  327. McFeely 1981, p. 279.
  328. White 2016, pp. 476–78; Simon 2002, p. 248; Burdekin & Siklos 2013, pp. 24–25.
  329. Simon 2002, p. 248; Chernow 2017, p. 672; Calhoun 2017, p. 125; Kahan 2018, p. 54.
  330. Calhoun 2017, pp. 125–28; Kahan 2018, p. 54.
  331. Calhoun 2017, p. 128.
  332. Brands 2012a, pp. 437–443; McFeely 1974, p. 134; Chernow 2017, p. 673; Calhoun 2017, pp. 128–129; Kahan 2018, p. 55.
  333. McFeely 1981, pp. 136, 323–324; Chernow 2017, p. 674; Kahan 2018, pp. 55–56.
  334. Calhoun 2017, p. 130.
  335. Calhoun 2017, p. 131.
  336. Brands 2012a, pp. 437–43; Simon 2002, p. 248; Calhoun 2017, p. 130.
  337. Calhoun 2017, pp. 140–141.
  338. Calhoun 2017, p. 141.
  339. Brands 2012a, pp. 445, 636; Chernow 2017, pp. 677–88; Calhoun 2017, p. 141.
  340. Brands 2012a, pp. 445–46; Simon 2002, p. 248.
  341. McFeely 1981, p. 328; Smith 2001, p. 490.
  342. Calhoun 2017, pp. 310–311, 380–381.
  343. Kahan 2018, pp. 75–76.
  344. Grant, Ulysses Simpson (2000). The Papers of Ulysses S. Grant: 1873. SIU Press. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-8093-2277-0.
  345. Kahan 2018, p. 76.
  346. Simon 2002, p. 249; Smith 2001, p. 491; Kahan 2018, p. 78.
  347. Libby, Justin (1994). "Hamilton Fish and the Origins of Anglo-American Solidarity". Mid-America. 76 (3): 205–226.
  348. McFeely 1981, pp. 352–354.
  349. John W. Dwinelle (1870). American Opinions on the "Alabama," and other political questions. pp. 37–39.
  350. Smith 2001, pp. 508–511.
  351. Smith 2001, pp. 512–15; Simon 2002, p. 249.
  352. Smith 2001, p. 249; Simon 2002, pp. 512–15; Calhoun 2017, p. 344.
  353. ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 7.
  354. Wallace, W. Stewart. "Treaty of Washington, 1871". Marianopolis College.
  355. ^ Roblin, Sebastien (January 1, 2018). "In 1871, America 'Invaded' Korea. Here's What Happened". The National Interest. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved April 14, 2021.
  356. ^ Kahan 2018, p. 139.
  357. Lindsay, James M. (June 10, 2013). "TWE Remembers: The Korean Expedition of 1871 and the Battle of Ganghwa (Shinmiyangyo)". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved March 28, 2021.
  358. Chernow 2017, pp. 555, 660–61; Kahan 2018, pp. 75–76; Calhoun 2017, p. 199.
  359. Chernow 2017, pp. 661–62; Kahan 2018, pp. 75–76; Calhoun 2017, pp. 199–200, 206; Brands 2012a, pp. 454–55.
  360. Kahan 2018, pp. 90–91; Calhoun 2017, p. 204.
  361. Calhoun 2017, pp. 207, 210–11; Kahan 2018, p. 91.
  362. Smith 2001, pp. 500–02; Chernow 2017, pp. 663–664; Calhoun 2017, p. 220.
  363. ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 224.
  364. Kahan 2018, p. 91; Calhoun 2017, pp. 223, 226.
  365. Chernow 2017, p. 665.
  366. Chernow 2017, pp. 660–665; Calhoun 2017, pp. 226–234, 254.
  367. Calhoun 2017, pp. 237–238.
  368. White 2016, pp. 509–12; Pletcher 1998, p. 167; Simon 2002; McFeely 1981, pp. 339–40.
  369. Calhoun 2017, pp. 254, 258; Kahan 2018, p. 94.
  370. Brands 2012a, p. 461; Kahan 2018, pp. 94–95.
  371. Chernow 2017, pp. 715–716.
  372. Brands 2012a, p. 461; Smith 2001, pp. 505–506.
  373. Simon 2002, p. 250; McFeely 1981, pp. 349–352; Kahan 2018, p. 95.
  374. Priest, Andrew (2014). "Thinking about Empire: The administration of Ulysses S. Grant, Spanish colonialism and the ten years' war in Cuba" (PDF). Journal of American Studies. 48 (2): 541–558. doi:10.1017/s0021875813001400. ISSN 0021-8758. S2CID 145139039.
  375. ^ Hamilton Fish (1808–1893).
  376. Calhoun 2017, pp. 426–31.
  377. Nevins 1936, pp. 667–94.
  378. Calhoun 2017, pp. 539–40.
  379. Hendrix, Steve (April 25, 2018). "'Brilliant beyond all precedent': The first White House state dinner for the king of Hawaii". The Washington Post.
  380. Calhoun 2017, pp. 539–540.
  381. Farr, Kate. "Reciprocity Treaty of 1875". Dartmouth College. Archived from the original on October 21, 2023. Retrieved June 29, 2023.
  382. White 2016, p. 487.
  383. White 2016, p. 491.
  384. ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 830–31.
  385. ^ "President Ulysses S. Grant and Federal Indian Policy". National Park Service. Ulysses S. Grant National Historic Site. Retrieved April 14, 2022.
  386. White 2016, pp. 490–491; Simon 2002, p. 250; Smith 2001, pp. 472–473.
  387. Simon 2002, p. 250; Smith 2001, p. 535; Simon 2002, p. 250.
  388. McFeely 1981, pp. 308–309; Brands 2012a, p. 502.
  389. Calhoun 2017, p. 270.
  390. Waltmann 1971, p. 327.
  391. Simon 2002, p. 250.
  392. Coffey 2011; Kahan 2018, pp. 71–72.
  393. Block, Kathy. Du Shane, Neal (ed.). "Skeleton Cave Massacre Site". American Pioneer & Cemetery Research Project.
  394. ^ Smith 2001, pp. 532–535; Coffey 2011.
  395. Kahan 2018, p. 127.
  396. Coffey 2011, pp. 604–605.
  397. Taylor 2011, pp. 3187–3188; Pritchard 1999, p. 5.
  398. "Timeline of U.S. Indian Massacres". AAANativeArts.com. February 29, 2016.
  399. Chernow 2017, pp. 830–831; Brands 2012a, p. 564.
  400. Chernow 2017, p. 832; Calhoun 2017, p. 546.
  401. Smith 2001, p. 538.
  402. Brands 2012a, pp. 565–566; Donovan 2008, pp. 115, 322–323.
  403. Calhoun 2017, p. 549.
  404. McFeely 1981, p. 316.
  405. Smith 2001, p. 541.
  406. Simon 2002, p. 250; Chernow 2017, pp. 734–735; Kahan 2018, pp. 105–106; Brands 2012a, pp. 488–489.
  407. Kahan 2018, pp. 104–106.
  408. Simon 2002, pp. 250–51; Brands 2012a, p. 495; Chernow 2017, pp. 740–741.
  409. Wang 1997, pp. 103–104; Simon 2002, p. 250; Chernow 2017, pp. 735, 740.
  410. Brands 2012a, p. 495.
  411. Calhoun 2017, pp. 361, 375.
  412. Simon 2002, p. 251; Chernow 2017, p. 753; Kahan 2018, p. 114.
  413. Chernow 2017, p. 743.
  414. White 2016, p. 532.
  415. Calhoun 2017, pp. 372–373, 387.
  416. Chernow 2017, pp. 749–750.
  417. Foner 2014; Calhoun 2017.
  418. White 2016, p. 535.
  419. McFeely 1981, p. 384; Simon 2002, pp. 250–251; Chernow 2017, p. 749.
  420. "Election of 1872". The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara.
  421. Simon 2002, pp. 250–251; Brands 2012a, p. 499.
  422. Foner 2014, p. 508.
  423. Goethals 2015, p. 98.
  424. Simon 2002, pp. 250–251.
  425. Chernow 2017, pp. 752–53.
  426. White 2016, pp. 540–41.
  427. White 2016, p. 545; Diller 1996, p. 1545.
  428. McFeely 1981, p. 385.
  429. Venable 2011, pp. 66–68.
  430. Weinstein 1967, pp. 307–326.
  431. Brands 2012a, p. 517.
  432. McFeely 1981, p. 393.
  433. ^ Smith 2001, pp. 576–579.
  434. Brands 2012a, p. 518.
  435. McFeely 1981, p. 391; Smith 2001, pp. 375–377.
  436. Chernow 2017, p. 779.
  437. McFeely 1981, p. 395.
  438. Smith 2001, pp. 580–581.
  439. White 2016, pp. 545, 550.
  440. Smith 2001, pp. 580–582; Brands 2012a, p. 554.
  441. Woodward 1957, p. 156; White 2016, pp. 538, 541.
  442. McFeely 1974, pp. 133–134; Chernow 2017, p. 825.
  443. Smith 2001, pp. 587, 92; McFeely 1981, pp. 407–15; White 2016, pp. 538–39; Chernow 2017, p. 672; Kahan 2018, p. 119.
  444. Chernow 2017, p. 730; Schmiel 2014, pp. 205, 213; Calhoun 2017, p. 293.
  445. Chernow 2017, pp. 730–731; Schmiel 2014, pp. 214–215; Calhoun 2017, pp. 284–286.
  446. Smith 2001, pp. 589–90; Simon 2002, p. 250; Calhoun 2017, p. 372; Kahan 2018, pp. 105–106.
  447. Chernow 2017, p. 731; Calhoun 2017, p. 372.
  448. Smith 2001, p. 589.
  449. Calhoun 2017, pp. 366–367, 735–737; McFeely 1974, pp. 144–145; Kahan 2018, p. 114.
  450. ^ Martinez (March 15, 2021).
  451. Calhoun 2017, pp. 368–369; McFeely 1974, pp. 144–145; Kahan 2018, p. 114.
  452. Calhoun 2017, p. 369.
  453. Simon 2002, p. 251; Calhoun 2017, pp. 402–409.
  454. Simon 2002, p. 251; Smith 2001, pp. 552–553; Calhoun 2017, pp. 369, 404.
  455. Calhoun 2017, p. 446.
  456. Smith 2001, p. 578; McFeely 1974, p. 147; Chernow 2017, p. 782; Calhoun 2017, pp. 446–447.
  457. McFeely 1974, pp. 147–48; Chernow 2017, p. 782; White 2016.
  458. McFeely 1974, pp. 147–148; Chernow 2017, p. 782; Calhoun 2017, pp. 446–448.
  459. McFeely 1974, pp. 133–134.
  460. Brands 2012a, pp. 556–557; Kohn 2000, p. 417; Nevins 1929, p. 56; McFeely 1974, p. 148; White 2016, pp. 557, 560; Calhoun 2017, p. 494.
  461. Calhoun 2017, pp. 494, 496.
  462. Simon 2002, p. 252; Chernow 2017, p. 798.
  463. Calhoun 2017, pp. 496–497.
  464. McFeely 1974, p. 156; Smith 2001, p. 584; Brands 2012a, pp. 556–557; White 2016, p. 754; Calhoun 2017.
  465. Calhoun 2017, p. 498.
  466. Calhoun 2017, p. 499.
  467. Simon 2002, p. 252; White 2016, p. 562; Calhoun 2017, pp. 77–78.
  468. Calhoun 2017, p. 515.
  469. Chernow 2017, pp. 805–06; Calhoun 2017, pp. 518, 522–523.
  470. Smith 2001, pp. 592–93; White 2016, p. 564; Simon 2002.
  471. Smith 2001, p. 592.
  472. Smith 2001, pp. 591–593; Simon 2002, p. 252; Calhoun 2017, p. 527.
  473. McFeely 1974, pp. 149–150.
  474. Simon 2002, p. 250; Patrick 1968, p. 172; White 2016, p. 560.
  475. White 2016, p. 557; Chernow 2017, pp. 787–788.
  476. McFeely 1981, p. 429; White 2016, p. 554.
  477. Brands 2012a, pp. 560–561; Donovan 2008, p. 104; Simon 2002, p. 252; Chernow 2017.
  478. Simon 2002, p. 252.
  479. Chernow 2017, pp. 819–20.
  480. McFeely 1974, p. 153.
  481. McFeely 1981, pp. 441–42.
  482. Simon 2002, pp. 252–53.
  483. McFeely 1981, pp. 440–41; Patrick 1968, p. 255; Simon 2002, pp. 252–253.
  484. Simon 2002; McFeely 1981, pp. 440–441; Smith 2001, pp. 586, 596.
  485. Smith 2001, pp. 597–98.
  486. "Election of 1876". The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara.
  487. Smith 2001, pp. 601–603.
  488. Smith 2001, p. 604; Chernow 2017, p. 858.
  489. Smith 2001, pp. 603–604.
  490. Chernow 2017, p. 862; White 2016, p. 587.
  491. McFeely 1981, pp. 448–449; White 2016, p. 587.
  492. Smith 2001, p. 387.
  493. White 2016, p. 590.
  494. Chernow 2017, p. 872.
  495. White 2016, pp. 597–602, 608–10.
  496. Campbell 2016, pp. xi–xii, 2–3.
  497. Smith 2001, p. 613; Chernow 2017, pp. 881–83.
  498. Chernow 2017, p. 871.
  499. Compromise and Political Action Political Morality in Liberal and Democratic Life By J. Patrick Dobel, 1990, P.11
  500. Hesseltine 1957, pp. 432–439.
  501. ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 600–601.
  502. McFeely 1981, pp. 479–481.
  503. Brands 2012a, p. 602.
  504. Smith 2001, p. 617.
  505. Brands 2012a, pp. 604–605.
  506. Brands 2012a, pp. 607–609.
  507. Brands 2012a, pp. 613–614.
  508. Bunting 2004, p. 151.
  509. Brands 2012a, p. 611.
  510. McFeely 1981, pp. 486–89.
  511. McFeely 1981, pp. 488–91; Ward 2012.
  512. Brands 2012a, p. 619.
  513. McFeely 1981, pp. 488–91.
  514. White 2016, pp. 627–29.
  515. ^ King, Gilbert (January 16, 2013). "War and Peace of Mind for Ulysses S. Grant". Smithsonian.
  516. Chernow 2017, p. 917.
  517. Brands 2012a, pp. 620–21; White 2016, pp. 627–629.
  518. McFeely 1981, pp. 492–93.
  519. "General Grant's Example: He Declines Mr. Vanderbilt's Offer to Relieve Him from His Debt". New York Herald. May 22, 1884. p. 3G.
  520. Perry 2004, p. xxix.
  521. White 2016, pp. 632–33; Brands 2012a, pp. 620–21.
  522. Smith 2001, p. 621.
  523. Badeau 1887, p. 447; Mackowski & White 2015, p. 169.
  524. Chernow 2017, pp. 925–26.
  525. McFeely 1981, pp. 495–496.
  526. White 2016, p. 636; Waugh 2009, p. 277.
  527. White 2016, p. 637.
  528. Brands 2012a, pp. 622–662; Smith 2001, p. 625.
  529. "TimesMachine: Sunday March 1, 1885 - NYTimes.com". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 14, 2024.
  530. Smith 2001, p. 625; White 2016, p. 641.
  531. McFeely 1981.
  532. Brands 2012a, p. 625.
  533. White 2016, p. 646.
  534. Brands 2012a, pp. 629–630.
  535. Smith 2001, p. 627.
  536. Russell 1990, pp. 189–209.
  537. McFeely 1981, p. 517.
  538. Chernow 2017, p. 955.
  539. ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 633–35.
  540. Smith 2001, p. 19.
  541. Brands 2012a, pp. 633–635.
  542. Waugh 2009, pp. 215–259.
  543. Bonekemper 2012, p. xiii.
  544. Bonekemper 2011; White 2016, pp. 287–88.
  545. McFeely 1981, pp. 55, 77; Waugh 2009, pp. 39–40.
  546. White 2016, p. 539.
  547. Calhoun 2017, p. 592.
  548. McFeely 1981, pp. 521–22; White 2016, p. xxiii; Calhoun 2017, p. 587.
  549. Brands 2012b, p. 45.
  550. Rafuse 2007, p. 851.
  551. McFeely 1981, pp. xii, xiii, 522; White 2016, p. xxiv.
  552. Swain, Susan (February 17, 2017). "C-SPAN Releases Third Historians Survey of Presidential Leadership". C-SPAN. Retrieved June 30, 2020. The most-average U.S. president, as rated by our historian participants is Ulysses S. Grant, who ranks 22 out of 43 presidents.
  553. "Ulysses S. Grant". C-SPAN. September 4, 2001. Retrieved June 30, 2020.
  554. Waugh 2009, p. 2; Stiles 2016.
  555. "Today's historians have a higher opinion of Ulysses S. Grant". The Economist. October 5, 2017.
  556. Maslin, Janet (October 10, 2017). "In Ron Chernow's 'Grant,' an American Giant's Makeover Continues". The New York Times.
  557. Hunt 2017.
  558. White 2016, p. xxiv.
  559. Farley 2021.
  560. Brockell, Gillian (June 30, 2021). "Historians just ranked the presidents. Trump wasn't last". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 3, 2023. Retrieved July 3, 2023.
  561. Historical Register and Dictionary of the United States Army. Francis B. Heitman. 1903. Vol. 1. p. 470.
  562. Simpson, Brooks D. (October 11, 2024). "Someone got promoted!" (Tweet). Retrieved October 12, 2024 – via Twitter. Memorandum for the Secretary of the Army; Subject: Posthumous Advancement on the Retired List; . . . General Ulysses S. Grant . . . to the grade of General of the Armies . . .

Bibliography

Biographical

Military and politics

Historiography

Further reading

Main article: Bibliography of Ulysses S. Grant

Articles

Books

External links

Ulysses S. Grant
18th President of the United States (1869–1877)
Military career
Presidency
Foreign policy
Economic policy
Government
reforms
Social policy
Post-presidency
Books
Life
Elections
Legacy
Memorials
Cultural depictions
Family
Offices and distinctions
Military offices
Preceded byHenry Halleck Commanding General of the U.S. Army
1864–1869
Succeeded byWilliam Tecumseh Sherman
Political offices
Preceded byEdwin Stanton Acting United States Secretary of War
1867–1868
Succeeded byEdwin Stanton
Preceded byAndrew Johnson President of the United States
1869–1877
Succeeded byRutherford B. Hayes
Party political offices
Preceded byAbraham Lincoln Republican nominee for President of the United States
1868, 1872
Succeeded byRutherford B. Hayes
National Rifle Association of America
Preceded byE. L. Molineux President of the NRA
1883–1884
Succeeded byPhilip Sheridan
Articles related to Ulysses S. Grant
Presidents of the United States
Presidents and
presidencies
  1. George Washington (1789–1797)
  2. John Adams (1797–1801)
  3. Thomas Jefferson (1801–1809)
  4. James Madison (1809–1817)
  5. James Monroe (1817–1825)
  6. John Quincy Adams (1825–1829)
  7. Andrew Jackson (1829–1837)
  8. Martin Van Buren (1837–1841)
  9. William Henry Harrison (1841)
  10. John Tyler (1841–1845)
  11. James K. Polk (1845–1849)
  12. Zachary Taylor (1849–1850)
  13. Millard Fillmore (1850–1853)
  14. Franklin Pierce (1853–1857)
  15. James Buchanan (1857–1861)
  16. Abraham Lincoln (1861–1865)
  17. Andrew Johnson (1865–1869)
  18. Ulysses S. Grant (1869–1877)
  19. Rutherford B. Hayes (1877–1881)
  20. James A. Garfield (1881)
  21. Chester A. Arthur (1881–1885)
  22. Grover Cleveland (1885–1889)
  23. Benjamin Harrison (1889–1893)
  24. Grover Cleveland (1893–1897)
  25. William McKinley (1897–1901)
  26. Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909)
  27. William Howard Taft (1909–1913)
  28. Woodrow Wilson (1913–1921)
  29. Warren G. Harding (1921–1923)
  30. Calvin Coolidge (1923–1929)
  31. Herbert Hoover (1929–1933)
  32. Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945)
  33. Harry S. Truman (1945–1953)
  34. Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953–1961)
  35. John F. Kennedy (1961–1963)
  36. Lyndon B. Johnson (1963–1969)
  37. Richard Nixon (1969–1974)
  38. Gerald Ford (1974–1977)
  39. Jimmy Carter (1977–1981)
  40. Ronald Reagan (1981–1989)
  41. George H. W. Bush (1989–1993)
  42. Bill Clinton (1993–2001)
  43. George W. Bush (2001–2009)
  44. Barack Obama (2009–2017)
  45. Donald Trump (2017–2021)
  46. Joe Biden (2021–present)
Presidency
timelines
Republican Party
Presidential
tickets
,
national
conventions
,
and
presidential
primaries
Presidential
administrations
U.S. Senate
leaders

and
Conference
chairs
U.S. House
leaders
,
Speakers,
and
Conference
chairs
RNC
Chairs
Chair elections
Parties by
state and
territory
State
Territory
Affiliated
organizations
Congress
Fundraising
groups
Sectional
groups
Factional
groups
Related
Cabinet of President Ulysses S. Grant (1869–1877)
Secretary of State
Secretary of the Treasury
Secretary of War
Attorney General
Postmaster General
Secretary of the Navy
Secretary of the Interior
Leaders of the United States Army
Senior Officer /
Commanding General
Flag of the Chief of Staff of the Army

Flag of the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army
Chiefs of Staff
Vice Chiefs of Staff
American Civil War
Origins
Slavery
Abolitionism
  • Combatants
  • Theaters
  • Campaigns
  • Battles
  • States
Combatants
Union
Confederacy
Theaters
Major campaigns
Major battles
Involvement
States and
territories
Cities
Leaders
Confederate
Military
Civilian
Union
Military
Civilian
Aftermath
Constitution
Reconstruction
Post-
Reconstruction
Monuments
and memorials
Union
Confederate
Cemeteries
Veterans
  • Related topics
Military
Political
Music
By ethnicity
Other topics
Related
Reconstruction era
Participants
Federal government
State governments
Others
Elections
Presidential
U.S. Senate
U.S. House
Gubernatorial
U.S. elections
Key events
Prelude
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
Aftermath
Aspects
Historiography
Memory
Legacy
Other topics
Hall of Fame for Great Americans inductees
(← 1864) 1868 United States presidential election (1872 →)
Republican Party
(Convention)
Nominees
Other candidates
Democratic Party
(Convention)
Nominees
Other candidates
(← 1868) 1872 United States presidential election (1876 →)
Republican Party
(Convention)
Nominees
Liberal Republican Party
Democratic Party (Convention)
Nominees
Other
candidates
Third-party and independent candidates
Labor Reform Party
People's (Equal Rights) Party
Prohibition Party
(← 1872) 1876 United States presidential election (1880 →)
Republican Party
(Convention)
Nominees
Other candidates
Democratic Party
(Convention)
Nominees
Other candidates
Third-party and independent candidates
Greenback Party
Prohibition Party
American Party
(← 1876) 1880 United States presidential election (1884 →)
Republican Party
(Convention)
Nominees
Other candidates
Democratic Party
(Convention)
Nominees
Other candidates
Third-party and independent candidates
Greenback Party
(Convention)
Prohibition Party
American Party
Portals: Categories: