Misplaced Pages

User talk:Nyttend: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:31, 8 December 2013 editFlinders Petrie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,002 edits →Reply: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:12, 23 November 2024 edit undoMangoe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users34,840 edits →Nomination of Pershing, Indiana for deletion: new sectionTag: New topic 
Line 4: Line 4:
{{User:Nyttend/Archive box}} {{User:Nyttend/Archive box}}


==Deleted Article Retrieval==
== Your recent revert comment of copyright notice. ==
Hi Nyttend,
For User:Nyttend. Your recent revert comment for the copyright notice on one of the Theodicy pages referred to criteria for copyright violation. Are you presenting yourself as someone who has read the book? Or are you presenting yourself as a Senior Copyright Admin? The history of two-word copyright and trademark violations is so extensive that your comment on the Talk page alone is ambiguous. Please clarify. Similarly for your comment on "fair use" which normally requires the first use of a copyrighted phrase or sentence (Macmillan Palgrave, Copyright (c) renewed 2010) to be fully attributed, which at present Wiki is claiming and asserting as its own. Please clarify. (Preview: http://www.amazon.com/Evil-God-Love-John-Hick/dp/0230252796/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1380551005&sr=1-1&keywords=john+hick+evil). ] (]) 20:32, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
:Please read {{UnitedStatesCode|17|107}}, which appears at the ] article; there's no legal requirement that the "Macmillan Palgrave, Copyright (c) renewed 2010" bit be quoted. Please also read the first part of my statement, which notes that the fair use defense would only be needed if a two-word phrase were copyrightable, which it isn't. Let me remind you that "Macmillan Palgrave, Copyright (c) renewed 2010" is more than twice as long as "Augustinian theodicy", so if the latter be a copyright infringement, the former definitely is; <irony>I suppose I should ] for copyright infringement if I weren't already ]</irony>. Finally, please note that I'm an administrator, and part of my "job" is removing speedy deletion tags that aren't applicable; I'm not a lawyer, but I've learnt enough about copyright as a librarian that I know that two words aren't ] to attract copyright, so I know that the tag you placed wasn't applicable. PS. I failed to answer your first question — I've never read the book. ] (]) 22:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)


You deleted my article: 23:13, 31 May 2024 Nyttend talk contribs deleted page Draft:Anne H. Flitcraft (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank) that I need for a class assignment and I was wondering if it was any way possible to get that article back? Or if you could possibly put it back into draft space so that I can edit it? Please let me know, thanks.
The short note above was in good faith. It responded to the question raised in the discussion listed because your response seemed the most thorough one of all the ones there. The edit which i offered to repair the copyright issue did not change a Single word of the opening sentence of the wikipage, but only requested fair use by quoting the first instance of the unique two word copyrighted phrase and placing a footnote at the Bottom-of-the-page to acknowledge Macmillan.


==My Hero==
If you are a serious graduate student planning a doctorate at the University of Indiana in History, then my only purpose in providing the url link above was only for you to be able to make an objective comparison of the Table-of-contents of the book with the outline of the wikipage. Because of your graduate student status your objective opinion of whether these two respective outlines match up one-to-one or not would be of significance. My question was not to suggest that you read the entire book. The preview url was presented for you to make an objective comparison of the one outline and the other Table-of-contents and to tell me if they match up in your opinion or if they do not match up with one another. Otherwise, there is a long history of two-word copyright violations which i can provide to you, mostly self-evident examples, if you request. My main question here is if you can look at the Table-of-contents only and match it objectively to the wikipage outline. ] (]) 18:20, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
:First off, I'm not presently a serious graduate student — not that I'm a flippant graduate student, but that I'm a serious non-student, since I finished graduate school some months ago. After checking the table of contents, I see no reason to allege that either article plagiarises the book's outline. As I have told you numerous times, with the possible exception of a very complex and original pair of words (words along the lines of "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious"), a two-word phrase is not by itself copyrightable, so no fair use defence is needed; the only reason I mentioned fair use was to demonstrate that we need not delete the articles, even were your claims of copyright accurate, because the fair use provisions of US law permit us to use copyrighted works in order to construct academic commentary on them. Let me remind you that as "Augustinian" is not a new term, as "theodicy" is not a new term, and as Augustine's theology has been studied extensively and intensively for 1½ millennia, it's unlikely that a 20th-century writer originated the term — I'd only believe it if we had several different scholars all stating that the phrase was never used before Hick. Finally, let me remind you of the legal state of things. '''(1)''' In '']'', 499 U.S. 340 (1991), Justice O'Connor's majority opinion held that "the sine qua non of copyright is originality" and noted that something must possess a spark of originality in order to be copyrightable. Think of it like a group of colored shapes: while the Marquis de Lafayette is believed to be the first to create a ], the design of the flag is something that anyone else easily could have done — if you'd never heard of the flag of France, it wouldn't be implausible for you to create a similar design. In the same way, it would be easy for anyone familiar with these words to use them together, even without hearing of Hick. Copyright can apply to specific names, e.g. if you put together a book with a main character named "Harry Potter", you'd probably be in trouble for copyright infringement — but that's because you've appropriated a fictional character; this isn't applicable to nonfiction. '''(2)''' You speak of copyright versus trademark. Unlike copyright, trademark law can be applied to one- or two-word phrases and concepts (for example, you'd be in big trouble if you started your own computer company and used ] as your logo), but the purpose of trademark law is to ensure that brands be distinguishable. Nobody's prohibited from using a trademarked term to refer to the subject of the trademark, even if they're denigrating it: for example, if Pepsi produces an ad talking about "This is why Pepsi is always better than Coca-Cola", Coke can't sue them for trademark infringement because they're only using the name to talk about the other product. Since scholarly terminology isn't trademarked, none of this is applicable anyway. ] (]) 22:09, 3 October 2013 (UTC)


Nyttend,
In receipt of your note. Since i am an admirer of Justice O'Connor and of her decision on the sine qua non of originality, i agree with your high value of it. You have put your finger on a central matter, and John H. Hick is recognized by a very large group of scholars and associated publications to be the uniquely Original author of the phrase "Augustinian theodicy". Not only is he recognized as the uniquely original author of this term but there have been two book-length studies of his unique theological innovation of this term, as well as a large established literature. The standard for acknowledging John H. Hick's originality on this issue is provided in my link from the 'Augustinian Theodicy' Talk page to David Griffin who acknowledges using the standard of the religious community scholars as "A Critique of John H. Hick's Theodicy". Acknowledging this standard of unique originality to Hick is not done on the Wikipage for Theodicy.


All of your contributions to the various pages on the Bloomington, IN historic districts are so greatly appreciated. You're my hero. Thank you for your devotion of the preservation of memory of domestic architecture. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The term theodicy was only invented in Leibnitz in the 18th century for the first time, over one thousand years after Augustine. This was explained on the Talk page of Iren. Theodicy three weeks ago, and the principal authors of the page (ItsZip and Quad) acknowledged this and agreed to include proper attribution to Hick in the first sentence of the article. A drive-by editor then took it out last week, and then the copyright issue of proper attribution against copyright violation returned. After Leibnitz, John Hick's introduced the uniquely Original phrase "Augustinian theodicy" in 1966 and attained large fame in the scholarly community thereafter. Two book anthologies have been published to honor him for this.


There are actually four words involved in the proper attribution for fair use provision which remain unaddressed: "Augustinian theodicy" and "Irenaean theodicy" both of which were copyrighted by the publisher for John Hick as being used by him for the first time, two hundred years after Leinitz invented the word "Theodicy" for the first time. This is not acknowledged on the Wiki article under discussion.


==Jose Landi==
Since everything else you mentioned in your most recent note was so accurate, i need to add that when i did a comparison of the wikipage outline to the book table-of-contents it matched up one-for-one. That is, for each section in the wikipage essay, i was able to draw a direct line from the subsection subtitles to a specific section in the book's table-of-contents. Are you saying that you could not do this? On my desk i have the one-to-one match-up before me and can provide you with the match-up from each subsection of the wikipage to a unique section within the Table-of-contents for the book. Please confirm if you can or cannot do this. If they match up, then the difficult for copyright infringement becomes even more prominent. ] (]) 18:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
:I have told you numerous times that two words are insufficient for copyright: the publisher cannot copyright them. Since you refuse to listen, I have nothing more to say on this matter. ] (]) 21:35, 4 October 2013 (UTC)


Can you please userfy this page for me. 11:15, 13 April 2015 Nyttend talk contribs undeleted page Jose Landi (242 revisions restored: History merge) (thank)
==Disambiguation link notification for October 3==


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


Thank you
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:45, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
] (]) 05:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 11#Template:NoCommons}} until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> — ]&nbsp;<sub>]</sub> 03:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)


== Jarvisburg, North Carolina ==
==DYK for Morrow County Courthouse (Ohio)==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that Ohio's ''']''' ''(pictured)'' was originally built without a tower?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 16:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)


I can't figure out how to link to deletion logs, but was going to #R this to ], but saw you G3'd in 2012 as a hoax. Guessing a redirect here is appropriate? ](]) 16:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
==Just A Moment==
Your speedy deletion of several boxing posters, in my opinion, was completely unwarranted. First off the debate had only four users who offered opinions (not including Stefan). Two who voted keep and two who voted against. Because of this, we opened another discussion ] and I took it upon myself to re-upload the deleted pictures at least until the new debate was settled. This time, more people participated and we were able to clearly reach an agreement to keep the posters. For whatever reason Stefan just could not seem to move past his defeat and remained somewhat bitter if you will. I don't think he understands the promotional side of boxing, which is all about hype and just how important these images are; they are not just part of boxing history, but Worldwide sports history as well. So I ask of you one thing, to do the right thing and reconsider your decision to delete these images ] (]) 00:42, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


:That would be fine. The deleted version is just a combination of copyvio and stupidity. ] (]) 22:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
:Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but before we move on from this, several things need to be considered. One thing that must be is the the discussion that I've linked in the above paragraph clearly shows that there are several users that do feel that the images should be kept. The thing is, these poster are in fact circulated all across the world. Like I've stated before boxing is all about hype and these posters are a crucial part of promoting the event and become the de facto image associated with it. I mean they represent some of the most important and profitable sporting events of all time. Perhaps another discussion is order because I really feel strongly about having these posters included on the article. ] (]) 01:24, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
::Not fine, actually, for a few reasons that I mentioned at Fiveby's talk. ] (]) 22:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
:::Gotcha, i was just being lazy with the redirect, ]. thanks. But now need to find out if it was named for or not and if he needs an article to actually say something about the place. ](]) 00:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16#Dillaby}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)


== Hey! ==
== ] ==


Do you happen to still have access or know of a way to get access to the May 5, 2011 Liberian Heritage? It's cited in ], and I'd like to cite it in ] as well, but I'm having no luck searching for it online. Not sure the best way to get a hold of it. <span style="background-color: black">] ] ]</span> 02:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Under what justification did you restore this file? When you restored it you also removed the deletion tag. In this case it clearly violates N NFCC. ] (]) 01:08, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


==Hello to you!==
==Deletion review for ]==
Hi, Nyttend,
An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> Also affected: ]. ] (]) 16:04, 6 October 2013 (UTC)


It seems like years since I've run into you on the project but I just saw a comment you made on an AFD. I can see that you returned several months ago so here's a belated Welcome Back! I always valued your contributions and hope to see more of you. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 00:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
== Problems with addition of unsourced material. ==


== Classification Yards Specail Locos. ==
] has been "claiming" that 'Corazon Indomable' already ended and its successor 'Por siempre mi amor' already started even though:
1. CI ends tonight with a 2-hour finale broadcast at 6pm Mexico time, as per source.
2. PSMA will be broadcast tomorrow October 7 at 4:20pm Mexico time, again per source.


classification Yards section about Specail Locos was in English. Specail Locos means that they are specially designed for hump yards. ] (]) 11:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
I've warned him for the past few days and told him to not make those "claims" official until said finale happens for CI, and until PSMA is broadcast tomorrow, but he chose to ignore my warnings. I thank you in advance for your time. ] (]) 18:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC)


==Repost of ]== == Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
] A tag has been placed on {{#if:Jeopardy! set evolution|]|a page you created}} requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages, because it appears to be a ] following a ]. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: ] which appears inside of the speedy deletion (<code><nowiki>{{db-...}}</nowiki></code>) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit ''']''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use ] instead of recreating the page. Thank you.<!-- Template: Uw-repost --> ] (]) 16:50, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
I note that when you removed the CSD tag, you said that it is "Nowhere near the same as before." This isn't really true. It looks to the 2009 version. If we need to keep the history, I think the right option here would be to redirect it. <span style="font-family:Broadway">]]</span> 22:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
:Look at the edit history: it's been changed around tons of times, including by the IP address that's been actively editing it just recently. I don't particularly care about what's done with it as far as redirecting or not, but the content has experienced numerous changes and therefore is not a repost, so deletion will require an AFD. ] (]) 01:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
::This article . The article was previously speedily deleted and ]ed based on CSD G4 guidelines on April 28, 2009, after discussion in ]. The article was deleted after recreation on May 20, 2009, and deleted and salted again on September 8, 2010 after another recreation. ] (]) 03:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
:::Ah, I see what's going on; sorry for the confusion. A previous AFD resulted in a decision of "]", which is illegal — it prevents the attribution that's absolutely required by the licenses that we use here. An AFD may not result in a decision that violates the law or various basic principles, and ] is one of those ]. ] (]) 11:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
== Frank Schlosser House ==
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 01:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30#Misplaced Pages:Draughts}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ~ ] (] • ]) 01:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)


== ] ==
Are you sure ] is the right building? I looked up the nomination form to start an article on it, and it says the house and harness shop on the property weren't built until , and the picture of the house in doesn't match your picture. (That, and the sign in front of the building says "Joseph Schlosser House", which isn't mentioned in the nomination form.) ] <sup>]•]</sup> 05:28, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
:I found the page about the Heritage House Museum, but it doesn't really clarify things. It seems to include the Frank Schlosser Home and the Joseph Schlosser Home as separate properties within the Heritage House Museum, but it also includes an otherwise unrelated house in what appears to be a different part of the town. While the nomination form does mention eight structures but only lists seven, I doubt the Joseph Schlosser House is the missing building; not mentioning it at all in the listing seems like a major omission considering that they described three nondescript outbuildings. Perhaps they're counting one of the fences or wells as a structure, though I couldn't say which one from the nomination. (Incidentally, neither of the sources you found seems to say anything about the Schlossers, unfortunately.)
:At this point, I'm inclined to write an article about the Heritage House Museum as a whole, including the third house. It kind of lets us sidestep the issue of what's in the NRHP listing and what isn't, and based on the Chamber of Commerce website, I'm pretty sure all three of those houses are historically significant. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 00:07, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
::Thanks for the tip on county histories; I'll keep that in mind for the future. I've used them before when writing community articles, but I haven't used them much for historic sites unless I came across them in a book search. By the way, I'm pretty sure every town in southern Illinois is pronounced differently from what you'd expect (especially if it's named after another city; ] is probably the most famous example of this). ] <sup>]•]</sup> 03:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
:::I don't think the house mentioned in the nomination form is the house you took a picture of either, since the house in your picture was built two years after Frank Schlosser was born. Schlosser isn't mentioned in the nomination form for the springs resort either, which is a bit on the short side (I wrote that article a few days ago). And I checked the article on Vienna, and it's pronounced with a long I, in typical southern Illinois fashion. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 03:40, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
::::That one is pretty short, though it also might be one of those listings where HARGIS replaced the real nomination form with a state form. Given how bad some of those early 70s forms are, though, I wouldn't be surprised if it was the actual nomination. The worst I've seen is probably the ] in California; it's not online because of the shutdown, but as I recall the description and statement of significance are less than two pages combined, and half of that is spent practically begging for a listing so they could get money to rehabilitate the building. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 04:04, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
:::::That's very odd. I can't imagine how an obscure book about whaling became the sample citation for Illinois state historic surveys. It certainly isn't because of the state's prominent whaling industry, though whales do live at ]. (Ironically, it looks like there's supposed to be a link to the state form on the Curtis House report since there are three separate links, but you can only find the national form there.) ] <sup>]•]</sup> 04:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
::::::Thanks! I'll keep that in mind if I want to start articles for any of those sites. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 20:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
:::::::Huh. According to , it isn't pronounced like the Austrian city, but then again that guide's from the 1950s so things may have changed. That or the locals are so used to the more common pronunciation that they don't bother correcting people (or the person you talked to was too nice to say anything). ] <sup>]•]</sup> 01:22, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


I created that article a few years back just like you created ] back in 2008. ''']''' (]) 20:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
==Talkback==
{{talkback|AldezD|ts=12:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)}}
] (]) 12:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


== Pennsylvania municipality pix list ==
:{{talkback|AldezD|ts=12:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)}}
] (]) 12:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


I see you haven't updated your ] list in a while. Late in the summer, I went through pretty much the whole list of 2500+ municipalities checking off if there was a Commons category, any photos, and a locator map. By checking against geo-located photos on Open Street Map and other photos since added, I basically have the updated list of municipalities like you had, good news we're down to about 157 municipalities without good or any images for their infobox. Because your list is so comprehensive and well put-together, is it alright with you if I go ahead and update your page/images? —''']''' (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 22:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
::{{talkback|AldezD|ts=15:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)}}
] (]) 15:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


== Deletion review for ] ==
== Combination Lock (game show) ==
An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRVNote --> —'''Matr1x-101''' <sub>('''''Ping me when replying''''')</sub> <nowiki>{</nowiki>''] ] - ]<nowiki>}</nowiki>'' 16:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)


== Whitescarver Hall ==
Why was this G4 only ''now'' protested? It was deleted two years ago, and just ''now'' someone finds out that it wasn't a valid G4? <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 21:42, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
*Okay, were any others of mine overturned? <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 00:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
:*The entire "awards" section appears to be copied verbatim from ]. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 01:03, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
::*Okay, my bad. I was going from the nomination's assertation that it was a copy-paste job. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 02:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)


Hello, I left a comment on your Wikimedia Commons profile but I see you're more active here. You uploaded this photo: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/File:Whitescarver_Hall.jpg from the Historic American Buildings Survey. This picture was taken by my late father. I didn't know he had contributed photos to HABS. Can you please tell me how you found it? ] (]) 21:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
== ] ==
:I found it while going through the HABS digital archives on the Library of Congress website. ] (]) 07:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
Regarding , would it change your opinion if the official name is ]? See the official trademark: {{US trademark|75084672|THE TERRIBLE TOWEL}}--] (]) 02:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
*You should know that such anti-Terrible Towel language can cause terrible curses: ].--] (]) 03:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
*My bad on the AFD--] (]) 04:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
==Disambiguation link notification for October 10==
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:56, 10 October 2013 (UTC)


</div>
== ANI ==
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 -->
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21#Marville (comics}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 21:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21#Kings (game}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 21:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


== Communities of Perry County, Tennessee template edits ==
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. --<small><small><span style="border:1px solid black; background-color: #EFCA37; background-image: -ms-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: -moz-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: -o-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: -webkit-gradient(radial, center top, 0, center top, 0, color-stop(0, #FFAA3B), color-stop(0, #E3B536), color-stop(1, #EFCA37)); background-image: -webkit-radial-gradient(center top, circle closest-side, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%); background-image: radial-gradient(circle closest-side at center top, #FFAA3B 0%, #E3B536 0%, #EFCA37 100%);padding:4px;">] ]</span></small></small> 14:00, 11 October 2013 (UTC)


Good afternoon! I see that you reverted an edit to this template to a version including a number of red links to pages that had been draftified until notability can be established. I am unsure of what you mean by your edit summary of "Redirecting communities to the county is grossly inappropriate," as it appears as though all you did was restore a number of red links. Could you please further explain what you were trying to do? Thanks! ] (]) 19:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
== blocked user possibly returning under a (not so) different name - how to handle? ==


:: They might not be notable, though. I added these places after I found them in the GNIS, but before I discovered the rule that simply existing in GNIS isn't enough for geographic places. Based on that, I took the articles that I created that I was having trouble finding additional sources or evidence of notability of, draftified then until I could do more research, and removed the entries I had created from the template. I didn't just go deleting redlinks, I deleted redlinks that I had added myself on a mistaken interpretation of the rules, then corrected when I realized my error. Either way, I'm still not sure what you were talking about with the redirecting comment, as none were redirects to the county.] (]) 01:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
You blocked {{user|Januarythe18th}} on the 10th for privacy policy violations. I suspect - from the nature of the edit and the style of the user name that is Januarythe18th returning to the fray. I'm not asking for action, but as it is recent, I thought you could advise based on the aspects of the case. What's the appropriate process for my concern? ANI? or another noticeboard? I will hold hard - and AGF since it could be a coincidence, or a fellow traveller rather than the same editor - but I'd like to know if possible for future reference. ] (]) 16:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
:Ah, another editor has taken action to report - sorry for troubling you. ] (]) 17:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
]
== October 2013 ==
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 01:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


== Nyttend, please correct this error ==
] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
*<nowiki>of the Jewish Publication Society of America Version (Old Testament), and from Greek New Testament</nowiki>{{red|'''&#41;'''}}<nowiki> text.</nowiki>
Thanks, <!-- (-1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 19:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


Nyttend, You created an entry for the historic home in Henrico named Edge Hill - https://en.wikipedia.org/Edge_Hill_(Richmond,_Virginia). You describe the accompanying photo as Front of Edge Hill but the street side view is the back. The south-facing front is magnificent and cannot be seen from Greenview Drive. This error would not matter but that the front of the house is significant to it's historic designation, please correct the text for your photo. ] (]) 11:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
==DYK for Screened porch==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that some people fill their ''']es''' with indoor furniture?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 16:31, 13 October 2013 (UTC)


== ] == == Partial blocks ==


Per your question at ANI, I'll try to answer.
Hi - this redirect is causing the target page to wind up fully protected because it's listed on ] as a potential spambot target. I think it needs to be deleted. ;) — ] 21:50, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
: No worries! Thanks for coming up with a better solution! — ] 08:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)


You can block editors from specific pages, in whatever namespace, or from entire namespaces. This is often useful in stopping edit warriors, as it's less drastic than a siteblock, and allows them to make their case on the article talkpage, for instance. You can block from multiple pages in different namespaces.
== Scouting ranks (Scout Association of Japan) ==


Namespace blocks can be useful for dealing with an editor who is to focused on WP space pot-stirring. . . Someone who is less than competent with templates might need a template space block. I've also used it for editors who are polite and communicative, but who have chronic sourcing issues in article space.
Thanks you for understanding on these, and for putting forth such cogent arguments!--] (]) 16:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)


It can be extremely useful where you might otherwise have to place an overly large IP rangeblock - you can deal with a focused problem IP range by blocking the individual articles or editors they've focused on. Harassment IPs are often dealt with that way.
== Discussion of interest ==


I wasn't keen on it at first, and there are still many times when someone just needs a siteblock. But it's a little gentler than a siteblock for editors whose problems can be isolated to a few locations, or where you want to preserve access to most of the 'pedia from a big range..
Since you participated in the discussion ], I though you may be interested in ]. ] (]) 21:41, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
:Another discussion you may be interested in is ], a proposal to make the second comma in a date/place optional. ] (]) 02:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


See ]. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 21:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
==Barnstar==
{| class="toccolours" align="center" style="clear: both;
|align="center" |]
|]
!bgcolor="#ccccff" |<font=3> '''National Register of Historic Places Photo Barnstar''' given with respect and admiration to Nyttend for finding sites in 9 categories of ] in Missouri. ]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 05:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
|}


== ] ==
== Your image was used in a news article ==


Hi, just checking why you reverted my edit? ] (]) 20:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Just thought I'd point it out to you in case you would be interested by such a thing: . <span style="font-family:monospace;">]</span>|] 21:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)


==Belated Welcome back! ==
==Disambiguation link notification for October 17==
Hello, Nyttend,


I just saw your message an AN and I must say that I noticed your absence over the years but I hadn't noticed that you had returned and got your mop back. You were missed! We are short-handed in several admin areas on the project so, however you wish to contribute, your presence is very welcome. I myself took two years off, from 2016-2018 while I dealt with issues in my off-line life and I was glad I took a break. I hope you still find the work here satisfying. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask one of the old-timers. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 04:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


:I see I already posted a belated welcome back in 2023, so just consider this a reprise! <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 04:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:30, 17 October 2013 (UTC)


==Talkback== == CSD removals ==
{{talkback|Cyberpower678|RFPP bot|ts=16:30, 17 October 2013 (UTC)}}
—] <sub style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub>] 16:30, 17 October 2013 (UTC)


Hi, I'm not sure why you have removed the CSD tags from these articles. They're quite clearly hoaxes which means G3 is applicable. ] (]) 23:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
==Request for advice==
For the first time since being on Misplaced Pages, I (and another editor) am being bullied, rather systematically. I've reported this on the Admin noticeboard. Another experienced admin, whose judgement I trust, has contributed to the page. Not sure if he is going to sum things up or what. Obviously I don't want to contact him!


== ] ==
The bullies have simply continued bullying, even on the Admin notification page (!), and are inventing new ways! My encounters with pov people before has been mostly confined to people with limited experience and, while it might have taken awhile, we convinced them to desist. These people are '''experienced,''' and collaborating which I find horrifying. If I thought that 3% or more of Misplaced Pages editors were like them, I would stop editing now. I don't know how they have continued without admin warning, for so long.


Hello Nyttend, could you please explain to me why you arbitrarily deleted Middlesex Record Office from the disambiguation page? In my opinion, the encyclopedic relevance is clearly given due to the presence of the article about the successor organization. ] (]) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
The issue is (as always) content, with which they disagree. And I am fine with their disagreement. They are not fine with mine! Or anyone else's!


== Removal of CSD ==
So is the Admins notification board the wrong place? Should I just "wait awhile?" Would it be better to take this to mediation? Not sure what to do. Their behavior is, IMO, obvious and (in one case) notorious. ] is in the toilet with no effort to maintain it, as well as a number of other protocols.


Hi Nyttend,
I would appreciate your general advice. Thanks. Replying here (or by email) would be preferable. They are, of course, watching my page, and would come up with some new bullying tactic! ] (]) 17:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
:{{smiley}} Watching this one, not your one though. You might want to stop with the accusations of collaboration, it is against a rule. ] (]) 17:43, 17 October 2013 (UTC)


I had requested a deletion of redirect ] to make way for AFC move of the draft article ]. The article cannot be reviewed or approved without actually deleting the redirect page. Can you kindly delete it? Cheers. ] (]) 07:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
==Nowiki on ]==
You're not the first. Please see the page history and . I won't revert this second removal of Holdek's request from the category, but I'm not very happy about it. Is it really confusing? When I unblocked Holdek temporarily for the purpose of commenting at ANI, I never meant for it to slow down the review of his unblock request. It can't be much fun to have to wait so long. I can only hope the ANI thread (where clearly nobody's interested in commenting on the block in any case), gets archived soon, so that these delays become moot. Do you happen to know if ClueBot is working the way it's supposed to? ] &#124; ] 14:55, 19 October 2013 (UTC).
:I've replied to your reply on my page. ] &#124; ] 15:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC).


== Please see ] ==
== ] ==


Hi Nyttend, I just made to bring the ], article in line with ]:
{{talkback|Talk:Buford Highway International Community|Unprotect or change redirect}} --] (]) 07:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)


{{cross}} ], ], ] (<code><nowiki>], ], ]</nowiki></code>)
== ] ==


{{tick}} ], United States (<code><nowiki>], United States</nowiki></code>)
Hi Nyttend. Neo ^ has had an open unblock request for the last 3 weeks with you as the reviewing administrator. He has been unable to to file a new request due to the current one still awaiting review. Would you mind actioning the unblock one way or another? I'll be dropping a line to Daniel Case, as well. ''''']]]''''' 10:39, 20 October 2013 (UTC)


I happened to take a look at the history of the article and noticed that you have been recently working on this and some related articles. It would be great if you could also help to fix some of the overlinking in these articles, in line with ]. Thanks! —] (]) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
==Ban Appeal of AKonanykhin==
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
Hi. Since you contributed to the resulting in the ban of Wikiexperts, you may want to consider the CEO's appeal at ]. --] (] · ] · ]) 17:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
<blockquote>'''Not required due to ]. Articles now appear separately at ], and both link to each other.'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
==Dispute not resolved==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
Regarding , no, the dispute over Chris's spurious noticeboard postings is not resolved. --] <small>]</small> 16:16, 21 October 2013 (UTC)


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span class="nowrap"> — ] (]</span> 07:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
== Could you close ==
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24#Cunty}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 15:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
==Happy First Edit Day!==
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
{{ombox
| name = First Edit Day
| image = ]
| imageright = ]
| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| plainlinks = yes
| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Nyttend! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 07:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
}}


== First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site Picture - precision location? ==
] or find an equally respected admin to do it? ]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 21:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)


Hi Nyttend! You have an original picture attached to the ] article ] . In the description, you have it located 'off Miller Road' at 37° 06′ 14″ N, 76° 33′ 07″ W. Based on the NRHP nomination documentation, https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/VLR_to_transfer/PDFNoms/121-0037_First_Denbigh_Church_AE_Site_1982_Final_Nomination.pdf, the location was cited as being nearest 18 Walters Road, about 4500ft south, at the next creek convergence. Language in the NRHP doc described 15 feet out of 50 of the church having being lost to erosion before rip rap was added, implying it was right on the river. The Newport News property records at https://assessment.nnva.gov/PT/datalets/datalet.aspx?mode=sales&UseSearch=no&pin=178000121&jur=700&taxyr=2025&LMparent=20 also match the NRHP assertion of a Donald Shenk owning the land at the time of the 1981/2 submission. Before I update, do you happen to have a different source or personal knowledge that would put the location that 0.85 miles north, near Miller Road?
== NRHP ==
] (]) 18:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)


:Saw your message, no rush, thank you - I'll try to remember to circle back in a few months.
I recently noticed that the NRHP nomination forms for at least some listings in at least Garret county Maryland are now available on the Maryland State Archives site. I don’t think this was true when I was taking pics there in 2012. Only small summary page was available on the Maryland Historical Trust site, but I could be wrong about that.
:] (]) 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)


==New message from LR.127==
Some NRHP entries, like ] use the nomination form as a reference, when it is available somewhere. Some, like ] use the summary from the MHT site as a reference when the nom form is (or was) not.
{{talkback|User talk:LR.127|Lots of AFC/R declines|ts=12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)}}
] (]) 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)


== Invitation to participate in a research ==
I started the process of adding an external link to sites like Pennington, with an external link to the full nom at the MHT site. Another possibility would be to replace the summary reference with a reference to the full nom, but looking closely at each one to make sure that the information referenced is in fact in the nom form is more work that necessary at this point, hence the adding of the nom form as an external link.


Hello,
I bring this up with you because you are actively editing in this area, and you are working on a bot project with Dudemanfellabra that may make certain assumptions on external links vs references vs known locations for the nom forms, etc. Is what I’m doing on pages like ] helpful, hurtful, or neutral? ] (]) 15:15, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
{{tb|Generic1139}}


The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
== ] ==


You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
[[File:Herbst mono strauss .JPG|130px|thumbnail|center|'''Thanks!'''<br />'''Ein Dankeschön!'''
<br />] <sup><small> ] </small></sup> ]]05:15, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .
==Discussion pages are not articles==
I'm not sure why the talk page archives under "]" are problematic. It is permissible, indeed in most cases obligatory under Misplaced Pages policy (largely due to copyright concerns) to preserve the user contributions represented in the discussion "talk" pages associated with articles. The archival contents of discussion pages are not subject to deletion, speedy or otherwise, except under extremely rare circumstances; indeed, discussion pages,do not meet the technical definition of an "article", on Misplaced Pages. Indeed, this is perhaps the only time that I have seen someone removing archival material from talk pages, and I am quite certain that this is not at all in accord with Misplaced Pages policy regarding archived discussion material (in fact, the archiving of article discussion ("talk") pages is a standard practice, even automatically by bot software). Deleting them is against normal practice, and even allowable practice, as far as I know. There may have been a problem with the implementation of these discussion page archives, or a glitch in the Misplaced Pages software, although it's hard to do an analysis when you have not only nominated talk page archives for deletion, but removed the material from the talk page with which the discussion is associated (it seems the "Hsigo" article is basically being moved to "Xiao (mythology)", and being rewritten, for good reasons, as indicated in the associated discussion pages, some of which you have removed, apparently with the intention of permanently deleting them. I did notice that the non-article pages which you have decided should be treated as articles for deletion did show up listed in X!s Tools, in article space, so I can see why you may have considered them to be actual articles. I'm not sure why, and it's the first time that I have seen this, but I suggest that it would be better to restore the archived discussion material and to instead figure out a different solution to whatever problem may exist with these non-article discussion pages (and, which may indeed have something to do with my implementation of them, perhaps a syntax error in the names). Maybe they just need to be re-named if they are showing up stored in the wrong data space. Thank you for your attention to this matter and taking the time to consider the seriousness of this matter. ] (]) 06:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
:Or, am I confusing your actions in this regard with User:Largoplazo?
::Sorry, I guess I looked at the pages in a transitional state, and it seemed like things were moving along too hastily for me to comprehend (plus I'm unfamiliar with many of the references of the procedure, like "R2"!). But, anyway, now I see. Sorry, I tend to get nervous about archival integrity, and thank you (both) for helping to fix my mistakes. ] (]) 07:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
==DYK for Gaston Borch==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently nominated. The fact was ''... that ''']''' conducted the first orchestral performance to be broadcast on Swedish radio?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Gaston Borch|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Gaston Borch|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> ] (]) 08:03, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


Kind Regards,
== The "Sviatoslaw Trofimenko" article needs to be deleted ==


]
The article relating to "Sviatoslaw Trofimenko" …


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
http://en.wikipedia.org/Sviatoslaw_Trofimenko
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->


== Hurricane Kristy (2024) ==
… needs to be deleted - this is not the correct spelling of the late Mr. Trofimenko's name and Mr. Trofimenko's widow has asked me to correct this misinformation.


I saw that two days ago you had overruled my decline of ] and moved it into mainspace anyway. There was an active discussion as to whether Category 5 hurricanes warrant notability, and the article will now most likely be merged. Why did you move it? ]]<small></small>  17:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
I have created a new article with the name spelled correctly ... "Swiatoslaw Trofimenko" ...


== Since you said you were curious about CTOP ==
http://en.wikipedia.org/Swiatoslaw_Trofimenko


Since you ] that you weren't familiar with the CTOP protection enforcements and were curious - if enforcing a protection of a page as part of ] - there's a logging procedure outlined at ] to log said protection at the relevant subsection in the log, such as ] for enforcing an AMPOL protection so a history of such protections is centralized, for example to say be able to see how often a certain arbitration enforcement had to be enacted each year.
Please note the corrected spelling "Swiatoslaw" versus the incorrect spelling "Sviatoslaw".
As I'm editing fairly frequently on various CTOP articles and counter vandalism patrol, I've encountered my fair share of it, so I've become fairly familiar with the theoretical aspect of it to seek help from admins on it to help enforcement as necessary :)
It's up to the admins discretion, but given the vandalism appeared clearly politically motivated, I would have considered it to fall under the AMPOL CTOP, which is why I suggested logging it, but it's up to you as the admin that imposed it of course :) ] (]) 04:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)


== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==
Therefore, the article ...


Hello,
http://en.wikipedia.org/Sviatoslaw_Trofimenko ... needs to be deleted.


I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].
I repeat - the correct article can now be found at …


Take the survey ''''''.
http://en.wikipedia.org/Swiatoslaw_Trofimenko


Kind Regards,
Thank you.


]
] (]) 15:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
==Disambiguation link notification for October 26==
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 15#Fishers Island, New York (old edit history)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> Regards, ]] 05:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
==DYK for Silas Ferrell House==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the first owner of the ''']''' owned two businesses and helped to operate a third?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 08:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
== Illinois map ==


</div>
Have a look at the new Illions map I made on the Graphics Lab-page: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Graphics_Lab/Map_workshop#Illinois_locator_map ] (]) 09:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->


== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
== Re: PAHMC release? ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Sorry - I once contacted PennDOT and they released for their NRHP bridges photos, but I have not been in contact with PHMC about the historical markers (I replied on the Commons Files for Deletion page yesterday - sorry to be slow, very busy IRL). ] ''']''' 11:57, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 22:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
== edit warring ip attacking without argumentation ==

there is ip editor edit warring at ] who does not want to give a proper edit summary other then some gruesome accusations like calling me "sockpuppet" just because of some so called "ip from the same country" at first i explained why i did my edit and he continues to disrupt the aritcle so there was no point for me to argue with him so i just reply that he is a '''sockpuppet himself''', he should be blocked or something ] (]) 16:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
:I gave a proper edit summary - there is absolutely nothing wrong with reusing same image that was used in different article. Second of all, you ARE a long-term vandal who specifically tries to edit this (and other Putin/Russia - related articles) for whatever agenda you have, anyone can look up edit history of this article, starting around this time:
:http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/95.199.26.163
:You were trying to remove Putin's photo (as well as other "negative" information) at that time, including using your (now banned, for multiple sockpuppetry) user account and you are continuing to do the same exact thing right now. This is the simple fact. ] (]) 19:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
::stop lying! how dare you come up with this nonsense, why cant you just accept there are people with diffrent opinions, of course the picture does not belong there we do not need two identical articles, that article is not just about putin so we should not show russia out of proportions there are already massive critisim in all putin related articles on wikipedia, "mafia state" is very '''dirty electioneering''', am not opossing critisim of putin, claims about authoritarian government is true but why do you have make thing up ] (]) 20:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
:::The fact that you continue to vandalize same exact article in same exact way (even though multiple editors have reversed your edits multiple times) over such long term has nothing to do with an "opinion". Anyway, I presented my evidence, the rest is up to Administrator to decide. ] (]) 20:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

::::this ip user does not want to discuss the matter and instead just accusing me if vandalism and sockpuppetry, i did a completly normal edit
there is no reason to force the article to be focused on putin! there already is a similar article with the same picture, i do not know what agenda this ip has but wikipedia should be a place for dirty politics, wikipedia should be neutral, yes putin is a authoritarian leader i have nothing aganist the dictator part but "mafia state" neologism is just verty dirty political propoganda
we do not need a putin picure, the article is obviously about the concept not olny about putin and we already has a similar article with the very same picture ] (]) 20:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
:::::I'm not particularly interested in this dispute and don't have a clear opinion on which one (or two) of you two is in the wrong, so I've semiprotected it for a month. Feel free to continue discussing at the article's talk page, and remember that semiprotection can always be removed if you show that you're not going to continue edit warring. ] (]) 21:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
::::::I do not really see the point - same vandal . Oh well, I guess that means I have to do the same... Right? Thank you for your "encouragement". ] (]) 23:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
:::::::The edit summary is an admission of sockpuppetry, and since the sock was used specifically for edit warring, I've blocked the account indefinitely. I'm not going to block any of the IP addresses in question: it's rather pointless, as the same guy has been using multiple addresses. Please remember that people who have been blocked are not welcome to edit Misplaced Pages; you can report any future edits to me for {{tl|uw-ipevadeblock}} or {{tl|uw-sockblock}} on ]. ] (]) 23:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

==ANI==
Is there something you suggest be discussed at ANI? You have closed the AN3 report, and there is none at ANI. Please also look at the fact that Rms125a has copied the entire AN3 report onto the ] page. I'd hat it as not relevant to that article, but maybe as a neutral admin it would be better if you consider doing that. Thanks. ] (]) 21:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
:{{tps}}Nyttend meant ], where RMS cross-posted the complaint. ]&nbsp;]] 21:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

==New vandalism by Medeis==
<s>Please see -- Medeis is vandalizing the Marcia Wallace page and about to try to start an edit war. Please give him a lengthy block. ] 22:22, 29 October 2013 (UTC)</s>
:: Never mind. I opened a discussion about this particular issue at Wallace's ]. Please stop by. ] 01:30, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

=="England, UK" vs "England"==
A discussion has been started at ] on a topic you have recently discussed elsewhere. Please have your say if you wish. Thanks, ] (]) 22:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

== Hey. ==

<tt>:P</tt>

Actually, though. I was gripped by fear when I saw localhost start editing, since I had been testing a filter a few minutes beforehand. The kids who came to my door right after thought I was dressed up as a ghost, but I was just terrified. ] 01:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
:<nowiki>:</nowiki>-) I assumed you'd see it; I was going to leave a talkback to make sure, but then I realised that you'd surely be checking back at some point. Just curious, because both your comments and the warning at localhost's note that a block would be bad, but nobody says what would happen. Would it just block random users, like what's detailed at the about Unforgettableid? Or would it block the server admins themselves? Or something else? ] (]) 02:00, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

::Not quite sure - I was told to avoid blocking it, presumably because we've never had a situation like this before and nobody was sure what that would do. There were already a few consequences, primarily revolving around autoblock.
::But hey, ] <tt>;)</tt> ] 02:14, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
:::No way. I came close enough ] to being put in the stocks (], in case you weren't online at the moment), so I'm going to do my best to avoid joining you :-) I wasn't sure if we knew that it would be bad or if we simply didn't know what would happen; thanks for checking back with a quick reply. ] (]) 02:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

== ANI - Sisterlinks ==

Hello-

I'm dropping a more personal note here, but I left a short response regarding the possible benefit of removing {{t|Sisterlinks}} to articles created by a topic banned user at the thread on ANI.

Personally, I don't have any issue whatsoever with the editors at ] or really anywhere else. Cirt is a highly respected editor, former admin, and obviously a very valuable contributor to the project. I thought for a very long time before posting at ANI, and I don't take posting there lightly at all. I don't think my proposal is "crazy", and I do think it's a simple solution to the problem. In that subject area, Cirt has shown reliably over a very long time to not be able to maintain a NPOV. Removing links to his creations (in this subject area) on other projects seems like a perfectly reasonable action. Maintaining those links continues the long pattern of POV editing. I have now spent a month trying to unwind the mess of a single article, and he (and others) are actively editing from a clear POV in ways that negatively impact the article. I am open to other solutions, but I haven't found any.

Thank you for your input, and I am genuinely interested in any other solutions you see. Cheers! --] (]) 04:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

== Godwin-Knowles House ==

Replied to your query on my talk page. ] (]) 02:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

== Those articles about Lower Saxony, etc ==

I've been asked to implement your suggestions at . I know I don't have time for about 36 hours, and I'm not even clear about what I need to do about the restorations to keep the history intact. Delete, restore a set of edits, then move the article to a new name? So, I either need more of an idiot's guide (which would be great), or to ask you to do it! Sorry to be a pain. ] (]) 17:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
:Done, now that I understand how that works thanks to your excellent tuition! ] (]) 17:55, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

== CfD - Breeders' Cup Ladies' Classic ==

Hi - thanks for the comment re the C2D possibility for my proposed category move - I did see as one of the possibilities but wasn't entirely sure as I haven't done much around category moves, so decided to err on the side of caution and go for a full rename proposal - will bear your comment in mind for future cases, thanks for your help with this. --] (]) 21:31, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Writer's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | ] is a very nice article. keep up the good work ] (]) 15:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
|}

== DYK for Ramsar sites of Poland ==

We were reviewing and editing the article at the same time, please take a look again, you'll find that it is well over 1500 characters.... ] (]) 16:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

I've brought in a second source for content reference points and re-sumarized the entire article. I can't make it more abstract without delving into original research. The numbers remain, but still have an immediate ref tag. ] (]) 14:28, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

== Photos ==

Thanks for letting me know. I may work on some of those counties, or at least Saline, Williamson, and Jackson, which seem to be in the worst shape; for a combined 26 listings, they have only two images and didn't have any articles that weren't NRIS-only stubs until a month ago. Thanks for getting all those images; it really helps in writing the article when I can see what the site actually looks like and add a nice picture. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 07:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
:The website for ] appears to have some information on the lodge; I might just describe that listing as part of the state park's article, since it's the main lodging for the park. And the most striking thing about that map is the giant red circle around Bloomington; were it not for you, Indiana and eastern Illinois would probably look like Forgottonia does. (The Chicago photographers seem to be more focused on the Chicago-area counties, or else Warren and Knox counties would have had more pictures before you went there.) ] <sup>]•]</sup> 19:39, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
::It looks like the Giant City Lodge uses the historic cabins for lodging rather than the lodge itself (though there are also more modern cabins used as lodging as well, which complicates things a bit). Good luck with the book! ] <sup>]•]</sup> 00:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
:::Huh, that's too bad. Their website really shouldn't be allowed to call them the "historic" cabins if they were built in the eighties, though... ] <sup>]•]</sup> 02:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
::::I don't have that book; now that I think about it, I'm not sure that I have any local history books, actually. They're usually fairly expensive, and since I'm only interested in history as a hobby it's hard to justify getting them. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 03:06, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
:::::Thanks for letting me know; I was planning to do the other two Union County articles (and expand the two substubs) when I have time. Incidentally, are all of the address-restricted nominations publicly available like that if you know the reference number? If so, that's really poor security on their part, since I stumbled across another address-restricted nomination just by incrementing the reference number. (Not that it matters much, since most of their locations are publicly available anyway...) ] <sup>]•]</sup> 07:45, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
::::::Ah, I figured it was a security through obscurity-type situation. I'll treat those documents like print references as well; if anyone wants them to expand the article, they can always contact one of us. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 00:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
:::::::Thanks so much! Those numbers are going to be really helpful when I get to writing about those sites. As an aside, I didn't realize there's an address-restricted site in Cook County. Though given that it's a house in a suburban area, I doubt there's any good reason for it to be address-restricted (though I have my suspicions as to why it is). ] <sup>]•]</sup> 01:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
::::::::Sure, I can help with that; it's definitely a useful list (as is the category, which probably should have been created a while ago). Good job on the Wabash County Courthouse; that's the first time I've seen an official historic site survey call a building ugly (even if they're probably right). ] <sup>]•]</sup> 07:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
:::::::::I added the link to most of the sites, excepting most of the more modern sites and a few where the link seemed to stick out (like ] and ]). You're welcome to add the link to any of those if you think it would fit there. By the way, I noticed that ] appears to be a poorly targeted redirect and has a different link in your list; any idea what to do about that? ] <sup>]•]</sup> 09:21, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
::::::::::I can probably start articles for all three over the next few days, depending on when I get the time. The articles should be at the currently redirected titles anyway, and given how long those redirects have existed waiting a few more days probably won't hurt much. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 20:52, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
:::::::::::I started the nomination; see ]. I've never really liked the QPQ system, to be honest; it usually forces me to review articles outside of areas I know about, and I feel like it can lead to lower-quality reviews. It's part of the reason that I haven't done many DYK self-noms lately; incidentally, if you ever see a new article of mine that looks DYK-worthy, feel free to nominate it. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 03:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
::::::::::::Do you happen to have the nomination form for the Koster Site? It doesn't seem to be publicly listed in HARGIS, even though the site isn't actually address-restricted. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 10:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Thanks. I just finished ], so all three of those odd redirects have articles now. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 08:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

== MOS:COMMA ==

I have opened a new RFC at ]. <small>—''']'''&nbsp;]</small> 08:32, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for November 8==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:10, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

== Wikimedia LGBT ==

I just wanted to bring ], a proposed user group and thematic organization that promotes the development of content on Wikimedia projects which is of interest to LGBT communities, to your attention. I am sure you are so busy with your current projects, but I hope you might be able to direct people to this group if they are interested in LGBT content in any way. Of course, you are also more than welcome to indicate your interest/support, if you wish. Hopefully we can get some LGBT-related GLAM/Education/etc. projects up and running in the near future. Best, --<font color="navy">]</font> <sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 20:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
== Template:Relfist listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Template:Relfist'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 17:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

== Ok... ==

The image had a copyright notice on the image, which I had a feeling that the image didn't belong to the user. Also, you threating to block me again is not ], and this time I won't use a template for that matter if that's what you were planning to get from me, so please if this is offensive to you, I would highly appreciate it if you would settle this kind of matter by discussing it instead of cutting to the case by threating, and/or blocking someone. Thank You! <small><small><span style="border:1px solid black;background:#EFCA37;padding:4px;">] ]</span></small></small> 01:51, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
:Actually, I did check the links that the user putted, and mostly I didn't see anything that was a resemblance to the photo's actual license, that's why I assumed that it was no evidence for permission. Apparently, you have a very good eye than I do, if that's what you think, and mostly I don't really respect it, but it is you telling me what mistakes that I have done wrong. Yes, you make a very good part of your behalf if you were not assuming good faith, but it's still off-topic from the threating message that you have send me and have restored. Yes, thank you so much that you are understanding that I am trying to do my best here, and not trying to cause any serious trouble. I hate to say this, but I thank you that you have blocked me so that I could take some time off photos and focus more on articles, but sometimes me doing my job on photos, I really miss it, that's why I have gone back to it in the first place. Also, you saying my deleted edits couldn't be trusted, I have no idea how that makes any sense whatsoever, because if your trying to say it couldn't be trusted, then your actually trying to say the admins that were handling it couldn't be trusted enough to handle it, other than you. <small><small><span style="border:1px solid black;background:#EFCA37;padding:4px;">] ]</span></small></small> 03:20, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

==Reverts of RjwilmsiBot==
Why are you reverting it? Confused. ] (]) 22:57, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
:The bot run violated both ] and ]: it was changing around punctuation on hundreds or thousands of articles, and its changes took articles away from citation standards such as MLA or Chicago. ] (]) 22:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
::Do either of those prohibit dashes for page ranges? <span class="plainlinks">, </span> -- ] (]) 04:58, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
:::No edition I've consulted says to use them, and they definitely say to use hyphens, so again, we have a bot that's changing citations away from the established styles that are chosen by editors. Meanwhile, if some editions permit dashes, we need human editorial discretion to know whether a page is using one of those editions or one of the editions I've seen. ] (]) 05:18, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

== Overlink ==

Hi ... I just passed your ] article at DYK, but have questions as to some of your reverts.

For example, just to pick one that popped out immediately -- why don't you believe that it is a violation of ] to link ]. The link does not seem particularly relevant to the topic of the article, is an everyday word understood by most readers in context, is the name of a major geographic location -- in other words, it is the poster-child of what wp:overlinks says should not be linked. And do you really think that is a link that will be helpful? I would think that people who read wikipedia know what the US is.--] (]) 05:59, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

::
::This is a perfect example of a link that is highly relevant to the context. The United States is not November 12, which should only be linked on articles about dates/months/etc; it should be linked in articles about places within its boundaries, because it is highly relevant to them. Let me suggest that you be much more careful with this script; it wrongly changed the spelling of a few words, it wrongly added {{tl|convert}} templates in a couple of spots in which the metric measurements were given later in the same sentence, and it removed YYYY-MM-DD dates in citations, in violation of ]. ] (]) 06:04, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
:::For all the reasons stated above, including my near-quote of wp:overlink above, I think this is just the sort of link (the United States???) that wp:overlink is meant to have us avoid. But I'll leave word at that page -- perhaps others have different views.--] (]) 06:19, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
::::From a comment Epeefleche left at MOSLINK, they are correct that the link to Ohio or the US in this lead - about a local church - is inappropriate. We only link the most germaine terms (and avoid chain linking), and for a local church, the most germaine geographical link is the local city that it is in as clearly the church serves that town. A reader reading about this church is very unlikely to need to jump to Ohio or US from this article, and if they do, they can follow the chain of links through the Dayton article to get there. --] (]) 16:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

:Also spelling. I correct the spelling of "worshipping" -- the British preferred spelling -- to the American preferred spelling, with only one p. See . But you switched it away from the American spelling. Was wondering why. Thanks.--] (]) 06:06, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

:::One finds "worshipping" in American texts; this is a rarer variant, not a spelling error. ] (]) 06:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

::::One may "find it", but it is clearly not the preferred -- and my (American) spell-check reads it as incorrect. There are many references that point to the fact -- as in the cite I gave you above -- that says " British usage: worship, worshipped, worshipping; American usage: worship, worshiped, worshiping". See also . Even Wiktionary has it right -- . And since this is an American subject, not a British one, we should use the preferred American spelling.--] (]) 06:19, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

== Renaming of ] ==

Hi, just to let you know that we're in the third and final stage of the RM discussion at ]. I'm sending you this message because you participated in an earlier stage of this discussion. We'd be grateful for your input. Thanks! ] (]) 08:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

==DYK for Grand Tower Island==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that ''']''' is located on the "wrong" side of the Mississippi River?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 16:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

You wrote:

Response to :
#Basically a sandbar, I assume, but I'm using it in the sense of "a small river island that's lots longer than its width".
#I vainly sought a history of Perry County, Missouri, and I consulted a , but I was unable to find a date or year for when the river shifted. "Recorded" here means the historic period, i.e. after the area was settled, unlike oxbows such as ], which formed either when nobody was living there or when only Indians were in the area.
What would you suggest I change? ] (]) 23:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

:Hey buddy, long time no chat!
:I'd suggest a parenthetical explanation after "towhead", ''e.g.'', "A towhead (a long, thin island) approximately...". As to the date of the channel shift, I'd suggest simply saying that the date of the shift is unclear, just to head off questions like mine. Keep up the good work, BTW. --] (]) 01:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

== Talkback ==

{{Talkback|Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Battleground_and_PA_originating_from_Crusades}}

== Proposed speedy deletion of ] ==

I'm aware that there some differences between the current version of this article and the last version to be deleted, but I was hoping we would apply some ]. The afd to delete this article was closed only ten days ago. Is it really necessary to go through another discussion to establish a consensus that clearly already exists? Best Regards. ] (]) 16:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for November 15==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added links pointing to ] and ]

:] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;])
::added a link pointing to ]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

== ANI ==

I don't intend responding to in the thread, as others have more than adequately dealt with it. I would, however, invite you to withdraw it. ] (]) 12:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

==DYK for Sacred Heart Catholic Church (Dayton, Ohio)==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that many paintings inside the ''']''' ''(pictured)'' in ], were intentionally painted over?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 16:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

==DYK for St. Mary's Catholic Church (Dayton, Ohio)==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that World War II aviators used the towers of ''']''' ''(pictured)'' as a navigational landmark?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 08:02, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

== Your assistance please ==

You recently deleted ]
Could you please tell me who uploaded it, and when?

Could you tell me who listed it for deletion?

Could you check its information template, and list here the source field that showed where the image was taken from?

Thanks ] (]) 16:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

: Thanks for your prompt response. I don't need the description and history anymore. Cheers! ] (]) 19:50, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

== T: template redirects ==

Hi, you participated in ], some of which I have relisted at ]. Please come along and share your thoughts .. ;-) <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 15:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

== ] is a cut and paste of ] ==

Compare here and here. I replied to you at ANI too.] 23:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

:Now what are you going to do about ] which you un-csd? Or about this AFD? The undid article I redid the CSD but someone took them off? You mean that's going to have to go through AFD now? Please write back.] 23:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

{{talkback|WilliamJE|ts=01:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)}}
] 01:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

== A pie for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for voting to unblock me. I'll simply avoid editing Latin American topics. I don't want to cause any more distress at AN than what is already regularly in it. That said, I appreciate your wise judgment. ] | ] 14:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
|}

==Talkback==
{{talkback|WilliamJE|ts=23:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)}}
] 23:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|WilliamJE|ts=23:25, 19 November 2013 (UTC)}}
Note your talk page requests a User notify you if they posted a reply to you at their talk page. ] 23:25, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

== "False positives" for NationalRegisterBot ==

You recently removed the NRIS-only tag from ] and ], calling them "false positives." This is not entirely true, and the next time I run the bot, these articles will be retagged if left in their current state. The bot checks for inline citations, not just things listed in the "References" section. The only inline citations in these articles are to NRIS, and that is why they were tagged. If you don't want them to be tagged, convert the references listed to inline references, i.e. expand the article with information from those references. Just pointing that out in case there was any confusion.--] (]) 03:24, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

== County courthouses ==

Glad to see you're putting your new book to use. The list looks pretty good so far (aside from the missing columns). Though the final title should probably be ], to match the other articles in ]. All the existing lists seem to include a column linking the counties, too, though I can understand if you leave that out since it's somewhat duplicative. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 05:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
:Nice article! That nomination form is definitely on the shorter end, though. I need to remember to check for online county histories when I write articles for sites with bad nomination forms. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 05:59, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
::Nothing's leaping out at me either. You could probably make a hook out of the invasion of the site, since that might catch people's attention. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 02:04, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
::Oh dear, I didn't notice the other page existed when I started the newer article. I'll merge those if you don't get to it first. Unfortunately, the sources used in each article seem to disagree on when the courthouse moved to Lincoln; does your book say anything about that? ] <sup>]•]</sup> 21:37, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
:::Thanks for merging the articles! ] <sup>]•]</sup> 23:52, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

== Bitcoin ==

Thank you for your recent edits to the ] article. I don't understand what this phrase is meant to mean though, "even though the issuing network is constantly decreasing the rate of inflation." Are you referring to the fact that the rate of bitcoin creation is halved every four years? ] 02:09, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning up Bitcoin vs bitcoin. . I'd write "A bitcoin exchange" instead of "A Bitcoin exchange" since here it's referring to the unit of currency. What do you think? Cheers, ] 10:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

==DYK for Wabash County Courthouse (Illinois)==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that no part of the current ''']''' remains of its original construction, even though it is ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 18:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

== ] ==

Poor guy. First he gets blocked based on a completely bogus report (not your fault whatsoever), and now he's having his talk page vandalized by another of those IP socks... ] ] 20:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

== Greetings ==

Could you please explain to me what is ? ] (]) <small>pls ] me (i.e. {{]}}) while signing a reply, thx</small> 13:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
:I'd prefer you revert your edit, honestly. ] (]) <small>pls ] me (i.e. {{]}}) while signing a reply, thx</small> 13:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
::I think you should . ] (]) <small>pls ] me (i.e. {{]}}) while signing a reply, thx</small> 13:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

==DYK for Kolmer Site==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the ''']''' preserves the remains of a village where the French and ] interacted in modern-day ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

== NRHP sites ==
: Thanks Nyttend. As you can see by ] and ], the lesson has been learned. Thanks! -- ] (]) 02:14, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
:: Hey Nyttend! I hope my ''mea culpa'' on the CfD page sufficed and allowing the quick redirect to move forward! Thanks for having these taken care of and moved to their proper name! -- ] (]) 02:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
::: He pulled his opposition in response to my post which was part mea culpa, part concurrence with your rationale. It looks like my mea culpa was worth something after all. ;) -- ] (]) 03:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

== Carneal House ==

Could you have a look at ] (Covington, Kentucky's oldest house)? You added it used to be known as Elmwood Hall.

There are two contradictory addresses. It is not located at 244--246 Forrest Ave, Ludlow, Kentucky, as given in the infobox. It's on 405 East Second Street in Covington, Kentucky, as indicated in the article text and .

The Google Maps link is also wrong. ] (]) 07:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

: I talked to a local historian friend, who says Thomas D. Carneal lived in both houses. If each of the houses are listed separately on the National Register, perhaps there should be different infoboxes in two sections describing both addresses.- ] (]) 08:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

::My view is that if Thomas Carneal lived in both houses, each of which is listed on the National Register, then there could be either one article with sections devoted to each property or two separate articles. As it is now, the Carneal House article confuses the reader.- ] (]) 12:50, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

:::If you would separate the houses, perhaps I can contribute a photo as needed.- ] (]) 13:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

::::The house shown on the map appears to be correct. I will make sure to verify before uploading the photo. Thanks- ] (]) 13:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

== ] Arbitration block ==

Hi Nyttend. I've been looking at Spf5000's unblock request, and I have to say, I'm not seeing the reasoning behind the block. As far as I can tell from looking over recent contributions, nothing this user has written violates any of the sanctions applied at the Manning naming dispute case. I'm inclined to just unblock him, but in case I've missed something (wouldn't be the first time...), would you mind expounding a bit on your decision to block? Cheers, ]&nbsp;]&zwj;] 08:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
:Since it's an AE block, we can't simply unblock without the consensus of the blocking admin, or at AE, or at AN. --''']]]''' 08:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
::Well, quite - I should probably have phrased that better... ]&nbsp;]&zwj;] 08:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I have to say, I think that's reaching a bit - SPF's comment, while admittedly unnecessary and prejudiced, doesn't appear to be anywhere near egregious enough to warrant a block in itself, and I still can't see how it falls under the Manning sanctions. Given that he's already accepted that his comment was inappropriate, and has agreed to avoid such statements in future, can you see your way towards condoning an unblock? ]&nbsp;]&zwj;] 14:14, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I appreciate the unblock and have struck through my comment. I do want to clarify that in no way was this a revert war, for which i had previous run afoul of things. And the discussion wasn't about transgenderism or sexology or anything to do with the Arbitration case. I'd appreciate if you would correct the record on that. Not because my comment was acceptable but because there are many cases where such comments are genuinely in that filter and of need to be looked at. Your time is appreciated on this. ] (]) 14:34, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

:@Nyttend - much obliged. ]&nbsp;]&zwj;] 15:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

*By the way, ] is usually the best way to unblock someone. If you look at a blocked user's contribs, there's a link to it just to the right of their username: (talk | change block | '''unblock''' | block log | uploads | logs | deleted user contributions | user rights management | filter log). It took me a while to find that the first time I unblocked someone. ] (]) 04:39, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for November 27==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

== Kemper Log House ==

It appears that the House was moved in January 1982 to what was then known as Sharon Woods Village. - ] (]) 14:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

== Improper unblock, AN discussion ==

] This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:AN-notice-->

I have started an AN discussion about your unproper unblock of the IP from the discussion on Jimbo's talk page. Please review the two problematic edits and re-block the IP. ] (]) 23:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
:Nyttend, you've probably seen the thread already, but in addition, I added a comment about being concerned about what you said there. I want to add though: I can honestly say that I'm not making any judgments that what you're saying is "bad", and I think the issue is really terrifically complex. I'd like to get your thoughts on the essay I link there. - Dank (]) 03:41, 28 November 2013 (UTC) P.S. My main point is: I believe the end result of constant community discussions over where to draw the lines is just bad for everyone; a guideline would be better. What we generally end up with is people on all sides of the issues feeling attacked by people of opposing views. - Dank (]) 04:45, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

===Please reconsider===
Nyttend, I want to make a personally plea for you to reconsider your actions here. I think you have made an error. That error has cause a great deal of discord, and has long-term editors, including myself, reconsidering their ongoing involvement with the project.

I won't presume to speculate on your motivations for reversing Georgewilliamherbert's block of the IP, but If you simply choose to continue to ignore the comments of respected contributors to this project in favor of a single, non-contributing user, then I'm forced to conclude that you lack the appropriate judgement to continue as an admin.

For the sake of the community, I implore you to reconsider you position. Thank you for listening. - ]] 19:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

==]==
IMHO this is more RFD case than a speedy. ] (]) 18:32, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

==Notice==
I have initiated a discussion at ]. I am posting this notice as I am required to do so. ] (]) 19:13, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Misplaced Pages:Edit filter/False positives/Reports|Nyttend|ts=23:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)}}
] (]) 23:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Captain Assassin!|Unblock request|ts=19:55, 1 December 2013 (UTC)}}
''']''' (] • ]) 19:55, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

== Thank-you Comment ==

Nyttend, thank-you. I have grown so weary of working alone to prevent many, many "editors" who have tried to eliminate or damage the photo ]. I did not have the energy to mount much of a defense yet again over this last attempt. Thankfully, you have come to the rescue. Take heed: There will probably be others making similar attempts in the near future. Will you help me keep an eye on this file?

One thing: I have spoken to the photographer, and placed his permission on the file description ("I, the copyright holder of this work..."). You inadvertently removed it. The permission is no longer on Commons. Will you please restore the permission statement?

Thank-you again Nyttend. Cheers. ] (]) 00:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

==]==
Why are you removing the statement I added that the ] is located in the township from the article, saying it's unsoruced, while leaving a photo of the farmhouse in th infobox? Are you just being disruptive? ] (]) 14:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

== Sportfan5000 ==

Hey, Nyttend, I'm sure you've heard enough about this, but Sportfan is asking that their entry on the arbitration enforcement log be amended/struck to note that it was in error. What input would you have on this? ]&nbsp;]] 23:53, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for December 4==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

==General elections by countries CfD==
Hello Nyttend. With regards to this CfD, could you say whether you favour renaming the sub-cats, per the query I've raised ]? Cheers, ] ]] 13:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:Hello Nyttend. I think you may have misunderstood my comments about the categories - with the exception of Brazil, the others contain articles that are purely about the parliamentary elections and do not have the word "general" in their titles (e.g. ], ], ] etc) - it's only the categories that are called "general" elections. ] ]] 20:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

== Ip editor ==

, who has done a poor job insulting me, has been adding unsourced content in addition to using the comment box to insult me with profanity. He has been warned for adding unsourced content. ] (]) 18:42, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
:FYI to Nyttend and Platinum Star: I semi-protected several pages where this user (and other IPs, in some cases) has insulted Platinum Star and has been edit-warring to add unsourced content. Since this looks like an IP-hopper, I think page protection may be the most effective response to the issues, but I may be wrong on that. For future reference, I suggest that Platinum Star should refrain from including personal insults (even something fairly mild like "please grow up!") in edit summaries, as those kinds of comments only seem to encourage further misbehavior. --] (]) 22:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
::Thanks for the help! ] (]) 22:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
:::Hi. I dont have comp access now and i noticed that some articles have been protected. Once i'm on my computer, then i'll be able to respond to both of you priperly, and make sure that i refrain from posting mild insults again. Thanks. ] (]) 23:58, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
:::I'm going to have a constructive conversation with Orlady, and if there are any problems with the IP editor, I'll speak to him/her. Thank you once more, and I hope that your comp problem is resolved soon. ] (]) 08:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

== DYK nom of Agroecomyrmex ==

I responded to your concerns at my nomination of ]. Could you take a look at it when you get a chance?--]] ] 12:36, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

== Reply ==

Eh, no worries. The question is whether, in a disagreement on Talk, let's say, the fact that I'd been digging the site for a long time wouldn't give what I was saying more weight - given that I'd have a better understanding of the site than say, a person who has never dug that site or any at all (there are some things only learned via digging) - and then use the article as proof (this is the net after all and you have to regard most things as lies). ] &#124; <sup>]</sup> 5 Tevet 5774 05:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:12, 23 November 2024

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you.
Archive

Talk page archives

Current talk

Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3

Archive 4 • Archive 5 • Archive 6

Archive 7 • Archive 8 • Archive 9

Archive 10 • Archive 11 • Archive 12

Archive 13 • Archive 14 • Archive 15

Archive 16 • Archive 17 • Archive 18

Archive 19 • Archive 20 • Archive 21

Archive 22 • Archive 23 • Archive 24

Archive 25 • Archive 26 • Archive 27

Archive 28 • Archive 29 • Archive 30

Archive 31 • Archive 32 • Archive 33

Archive 34 • Archive 35 • Archive 36

Archive 37 • Archive 38 • Archive 39

Archive 40 • Archive 41 • Archive 42

Archive 43 • Archive 44 • Archive 45

Archive 46 • Archive 47 • Archive 48

Archive 49 • Archive 50 • Archive 51

Archive 52 • Archive 53 • Archive 54

Archive 55 • Archive 56 • Archive 57

(template link) (revert point)

Deleted Article Retrieval

Hi Nyttend,

You deleted my article: 23:13, 31 May 2024 Nyttend talk contribs deleted page Draft:Anne H. Flitcraft (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank) that I need for a class assignment and I was wondering if it was any way possible to get that article back? Or if you could possibly put it back into draft space so that I can edit it? Please let me know, thanks.

My Hero

Nyttend,

All of your contributions to the various pages on the Bloomington, IN historic districts are so greatly appreciated. You're my hero. Thank you for your devotion of the preservation of memory of domestic architecture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felychko1991 (talk • contribs) 06:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)


Jose Landi

Can you please userfy this page for me. 11:15, 13 April 2015 Nyttend talk contribs undeleted page Jose Landi (242 revisions restored: History merge) (thank)


Thank you BlackAmerican (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

"Template:NoCommons" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Template:NoCommons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 11 § Template:NoCommons until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Jarvisburg, North Carolina

I can't figure out how to link to deletion logs, but was going to #R this to Currituck County, North Carolina#Communities, but saw you G3'd in 2012 as a hoax. Guessing a redirect here is appropriate? fiveby(zero) 16:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

That would be fine. The deleted version is just a combination of copyvio and stupidity. Courcelles (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Not fine, actually, for a few reasons that I mentioned at Fiveby's talk. Nyttend (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Gotcha, i was just being lazy with the redirect, stubbed. thanks. But now need to find out if it was named for this guy or not and if he needs an article to actually say something about the place. fiveby(zero) 00:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

"Dillaby" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Dillaby has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16 § Dillaby until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 21:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Hey!

Do you happen to still have access or know of a way to get access to the May 5, 2011 Liberian Heritage? It's cited in Edward Kesselly, and I'd like to cite it in Quardu Gboni District as well, but I'm having no luck searching for it online. Not sure the best way to get a hold of it. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello to you!

Hi, Nyttend,

It seems like years since I've run into you on the project but I just saw a comment you made on an AFD. I can see that you returned several months ago so here's a belated Welcome Back! I always valued your contributions and hope to see more of you. Liz 00:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Classification Yards Specail Locos.

classification Yards section about Specail Locos was in English. Specail Locos means that they are specially designed for hump yards. I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 11:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Horse Creek, Wyoming for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horse Creek, Wyoming is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Horse Creek, Wyoming until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 01:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

"Misplaced Pages:Draughts" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Misplaced Pages:Draughts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § Misplaced Pages:Draughts until a consensus is reached. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 01:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Chaceley

I created that article a few years back just like you created Chaseley, North Dakota back in 2008. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Pennsylvania municipality pix list

I see you haven't updated your User:Nyttend/Pennsylvania list in a while. Late in the summer, I went through pretty much the whole list of 2500+ municipalities checking off if there was a Commons category, any photos, and a locator map. By checking against geo-located photos on Open Street Map and other photos since added, I basically have the updated list of municipalities like you had, good news we're down to about 157 municipalities without good or any images for their infobox. Because your list is so comprehensive and well put-together, is it alright with you if I go ahead and update your page/images? —Mr. Matté (/Contrib) 22:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Deletion review for File:The sun1.jpg

An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:The sun1.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) {user page - talk} 16:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Whitescarver Hall

Hello, I left a comment on your Wikimedia Commons profile but I see you're more active here. You uploaded this photo: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/File:Whitescarver_Hall.jpg from the Historic American Buildings Survey. This picture was taken by my late father. I didn't know he had contributed photos to HABS. Can you please tell me how you found it? Perodicticus (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

I found it while going through the HABS digital archives on the Library of Congress website. Nyttend (talk) 07:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Marville (comics" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Marville (comics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Marville (comics until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

"Kings (game" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Kings (game has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Kings (game until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Communities of Perry County, Tennessee template edits

Good afternoon! I see that you reverted an edit to this template to a version including a number of red links to pages that had been draftified until notability can be established. I am unsure of what you mean by your edit summary of "Redirecting communities to the county is grossly inappropriate," as it appears as though all you did was restore a number of red links. Could you please further explain what you were trying to do? Thanks! nf utvol (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

They might not be notable, though. I added these places after I found them in the GNIS, but before I discovered the rule that simply existing in GNIS isn't enough for geographic places. Based on that, I took the articles that I created that I was having trouble finding additional sources or evidence of notability of, draftified then until I could do more research, and removed the entries I had created from the template. I didn't just go deleting redlinks, I deleted redlinks that I had added myself on a mistaken interpretation of the rules, then corrected when I realized my error. Either way, I'm still not sure what you were talking about with the redirecting comment, as none were redirects to the county.nf utvol (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

"Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Nyttend, please correct this error

Nyttend, You created an entry for the historic home in Henrico named Edge Hill - https://en.wikipedia.org/Edge_Hill_(Richmond,_Virginia). You describe the accompanying photo as Front of Edge Hill but the street side view is the back. The south-facing front is magnificent and cannot be seen from Greenview Drive. This error would not matter but that the front of the house is significant to it's historic designation, please correct the text for your photo. Kwhopson (talk) 11:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Partial blocks

Per your question at ANI, I'll try to answer.

You can block editors from specific pages, in whatever namespace, or from entire namespaces. This is often useful in stopping edit warriors, as it's less drastic than a siteblock, and allows them to make their case on the article talkpage, for instance. You can block from multiple pages in different namespaces.

Namespace blocks can be useful for dealing with an editor who is to focused on WP space pot-stirring. . . Someone who is less than competent with templates might need a template space block. I've also used it for editors who are polite and communicative, but who have chronic sourcing issues in article space.

It can be extremely useful where you might otherwise have to place an overly large IP rangeblock - you can deal with a focused problem IP range by blocking the individual articles or editors they've focused on. Harassment IPs are often dealt with that way.

I wasn't keen on it at first, and there are still many times when someone just needs a siteblock. But it's a little gentler than a siteblock for editors whose problems can be isolated to a few locations, or where you want to preserve access to most of the 'pedia from a big range..

See WP:PBLOCK. Acroterion (talk) 21:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Art jewelry

Hi, just checking why you reverted my edit? Equine-man (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Belated Welcome back!

Hello, Nyttend,

I just saw your message an AN and I must say that I noticed your absence over the years but I hadn't noticed that you had returned and got your mop back. You were missed! We are short-handed in several admin areas on the project so, however you wish to contribute, your presence is very welcome. I myself took two years off, from 2016-2018 while I dealt with issues in my off-line life and I was glad I took a break. I hope you still find the work here satisfying. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask one of the old-timers. Liz 04:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

I see I already posted a belated welcome back in 2023, so just consider this a reprise! Liz 04:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

CSD removals

Hi, I'm not sure why you have removed the CSD tags from these articles. They're quite clearly hoaxes which means G3 is applicable. Here's a search result for one of the them AusLondonder (talk) 23:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

MRO

Hello Nyttend, could you please explain to me why you arbitrarily deleted Middlesex Record Office from the disambiguation page? In my opinion, the encyclopedic relevance is clearly given due to the presence of the article about the successor organization. Max12Max (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Removal of CSD

Hi Nyttend,

I had requested a deletion of redirect Pain into Power to make way for AFC move of the draft article Draft:Pain into Power. The article cannot be reviewed or approved without actually deleting the redirect page. Can you kindly delete it? Cheers. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Please see MOS:GEOLINK

Hi Nyttend, I just made an edit to bring the Neal, Kansas, article in line with MOS:GEOLINK:

☒N Greenwood County, Kansas, United States (], ], ])

checkY Greenwood County, Kansas, United States (], United States)

I happened to take a look at the history of the article and noticed that you have been recently working on this and some related articles. It would be great if you could also help to fix some of the overlinking in these articles, in line with MOS:GEOLINK. Thanks! —Bkell (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robinson Township, Pennsylvania

Notice

The article Robinson Township, Pennsylvania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not required due to WP:TWODABS. Articles now appear separately at Robinson, and both link to each other.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Voice of Clam (talk) 07:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

"Cunty" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Cunty has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24 § Cunty until a consensus is reached. SmokeSomeDrinkSomePopOne (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Calendar emojiHappy First Edit Day!
Hi Nyttend! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 		Party popper emoji

First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site Picture - precision location?

Hi Nyttend! You have an original picture attached to the First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site article here . In the description, you have it located 'off Miller Road' at 37° 06′ 14″ N, 76° 33′ 07″ W. Based on the NRHP nomination documentation, https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/VLR_to_transfer/PDFNoms/121-0037_First_Denbigh_Church_AE_Site_1982_Final_Nomination.pdf, the location was cited as being nearest 18 Walters Road, about 4500ft south, at the next creek convergence. Language in the NRHP doc described 15 feet out of 50 of the church having being lost to erosion before rip rap was added, implying it was right on the river. The Newport News property records at https://assessment.nnva.gov/PT/datalets/datalet.aspx?mode=sales&UseSearch=no&pin=178000121&jur=700&taxyr=2025&LMparent=20 also match the NRHP assertion of a Donald Shenk owning the land at the time of the 1981/2 submission. Before I update, do you happen to have a different source or personal knowledge that would put the location that 0.85 miles north, near Miller Road? Jacobsatterfield (talk) 18:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Saw your message, no rush, thank you - I'll try to remember to circle back in a few months.
Jacobsatterfield (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

New message from LR.127

Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at LR.127's talk page.
Message added 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LR.127 (talk) 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Hurricane Kristy (2024)

I saw that two days ago you had overruled my decline of Hurricane Kristy (2024) and moved it into mainspace anyway. There was an active discussion as to whether Category 5 hurricanes warrant notability, and the article will now most likely be merged. Why did you move it? SirMemeGod  17:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Since you said you were curious about CTOP

Since you mentioned that you weren't familiar with the CTOP protection enforcements and were curious - if enforcing a protection of a page as part of WP:CTOP - there's a logging procedure outlined at Misplaced Pages:Contentious_topics#Logging to log said protection at the relevant subsection in the log, such as Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_enforcement_log#American_politics_(CT/AP) for enforcing an AMPOL protection so a history of such protections is centralized, for example to say be able to see how often a certain arbitration enforcement had to be enacted each year. As I'm editing fairly frequently on various CTOP articles and counter vandalism patrol, I've encountered my fair share of it, so I've become fairly familiar with the theoretical aspect of it to seek help from admins on it to help enforcement as necessary :) It's up to the admins discretion, but given the vandalism appeared clearly politically motivated, I would have considered it to fall under the AMPOL CTOP, which is why I suggested logging it, but it's up to you as the admin that imposed it of course :) Raladic (talk) 04:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

"Fishers Island, New York (old edit history)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Fishers Island, New York (old edit history) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 15 § Fishers Island, New York (old edit history) until a consensus is reached. Regards, SONIC678 05:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Pershing, Indiana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pershing, Indiana is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pershing, Indiana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 22:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)