| Revision as of 04:03, 14 June 2006 editKevin B12 (talk | contribs)6,614 edits →Reguarding your edits to []: no better + edit conflict refactor← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:25, 12 March 2012 edit undoNight Ranger (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,429 edits ←Replaced content with '{{banned user}} {{Sockpuppeteer|blocked|checked=yes|casename=Daddy Kindsoul}} *Notes: :See [[Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Deathrocker#Log of blocks and...' | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{banned user}} | |||
| <div class="usermessage">You have ] (]).</div> | |||
| {{Sockpuppeteer|blocked|checked=yes|casename=Daddy Kindsoul}} | |||
| '''Old messages will be archived once read, thanks.''' | |||
| *Notes: | |||
| *] | |||
| ⚫ | :See ] | ||
| :See ] | |||
| :See ] | |||
| :See ] | |||
| :See ] | |||
| {{nobots}} | |||
| '''Note''' - Automated bots are not welcome on my talkpage, I consider edits by bots to be ] and will be deleted. | |||
| <!--BetacommandBot Exclude--> | |||
| == Re: Hmm == | |||
| Wow; thanks for the heads up. This has been going on for about a week now; see . I've also posted about this on ] and ]. It's getting harder and harder to assume good faith about him; if the anons are merely impersonating Leyasu, that's unfortunate. But I'm pretty sure that they're really him. | |||
| I really wish that the arbcom would have passed some findings of fact about Leyasu's editing while blocked since it did also happen on an earlier, separate occasion; it really frustrates me that they're not putting more time into this case. | |||
| --] (]) 20:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Motörhead == | |||
| You know every time I see their "genre" change I'm tempted to replace whatever with "Really REALLY loud Rock 'n' Roll" ;) --] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 16:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Haha... that may be correct, I think that is how ] himself refers to the band. - ] 16:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Warning about edit summaries == | |||
| Please try to avoid making harsh statements in edit summaries; these can be interpreted as personal attacks, whether intended or not. ] (]) 06:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| As stated by the evidence page, do '''not''' remove or attempt to modify the evidence posted by other users in sections established by them. ] 03:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : If yew want to get hold of me, drop a message on my Accounts talk page. If yew wanna discuss the arbcom case, do it on the arbcom cases talk page. If yew want to say something about me, drop it in your evidence. But do '''not''' vandalise my evidence or attempt to block me from posting it, because i will use it in my evidence in one manner or another. ] 03:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Yew post in my evidence, thats vandalism. Your lucky im even considerate enough with yew to move it to your own evidence so that you can better organise it, rather than just delete it out right. ] 04:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| === Import from ] === | |||
| :Hello, the user ] is evading a three month block to edit the article, he had blanked by evidence on the page using an anon to cover his tracks, blocked users aren't allowed to edit articles as per ] it stated such edits are viable for removal (plus I am reverting blanking) _ ] 03:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Still, take it to an admin or something, don't remove or modify what they've put, even if they've done it while banned. That's no better than their actions. I mean, yeah, they're banned. I can understand just speed-reverting stuff a banned user adds to a page(they're banned!), but insted your making modifications to what they've said as far as I could tell looking at history and the edit summaries. Thats one of those 'not a good idea' things. Esspecially not on an arbcom case on yourself. There's lots of admin noticeboards and whatnot to take this to. ] 04:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:25, 12 March 2012
 | This user is banned from editing the English Misplaced Pages. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking. (block log · contributions) |
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser evidence confirms that the account's owner has abusively used multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets · Checkuser request · long-term abuse page) |  |
- Notes:
- See Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Deathrocker#Log of blocks and bans
- See Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse/Daddy Kindsoul
- See Category:Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Daddy Kindsoul
- See Category:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Daddy Kindsoul
- See Category talk:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Yorkshirian