Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitextInline

Revision as of 16:39, 19 December 2013 editMann jess (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,672 edits →Water memory: Tone down again. I'm honestly not sure how best to express this.← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 22:49, 7 December 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,457 edits →Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery
(402 intermediate revisions by 86 users not shown)
Line 7:		Line 7:
	}}		}}
	{{Archives}}		{{Archives}}
			== Global warming skepticism and climate change denial ==
			Hello. A heads up in case you have innocently run into this particular WP buzz-saw: many of our colleagues have very strong opinions about the appropriate use of such terms and do not consider them interchangeable. ] seems to be something of a ground zero for this dynamic. ] (]) 23:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
	'''Welcome!'''
			:Hey, thanks for the notice! I appreciate it! While I haven't edited his article previously, I'm not new to the topic, so I do know what you mean. If it comes up again based on my edits, I have no problem discussing it, but using the most common terminology from the ''academic'' literature should be fine. Thanks again - hopefully I'll see you around in the future. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 03:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
	Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]{{#if:|, especially what you did for ]}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
	*]
	*]
	*]
	*]
	*]
	I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] your messages on ]s using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome -->-- ] 14:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
			::The problem is that the academic literature uses the terms interchangeably, sometimes within the same article. There are people who don't like that. In the interest of harmony perhaps the best solution is to put "skeptic" in scare quotes, thusly. ] (]) 03:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
	==A thank you note ==
			:::Using the word "skeptic" throws up red flags for me right off the bat, because it is the word used in a PR campaign by "climate change ''skeptics''". Given that, yes, I suppose there would be usage of "skeptic" out there on the net, since it's the label they've promoted. More significant to me is what impartial academic sources use to describe the topic, and my understanding ''has been'' that "climate change denial" is more common among ''those'' sources. I could be wrong, and I'll spend some time researching this in the next few days. Perhaps that will change my perspective. <small>To be honest, I'm not really looking forward to wading into a new perennial discussion, but here we go...</small> Thanks for the feedback! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 05:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
	As StevenJ81 has said, even when you are talking with someone you disagree with, you still are polite and respectful . Thank you for teaching me some of the basics of Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 05:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
			<small>feel ya!</small> Thanks for the refs. I have used most of them to improve the article. Any way you could share the Critical Policy Studies by Dieter Plehwe? It looks interesting. Thanks again. ] (]) 17:59, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
	:Thanks Sackinator. There's a lot of drama here (as you have probably gathered), and it's always nice to hear something positive from an editor I've worked with. If you need any more help or have other questions, you're always welcome on my talk. Thanks. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 02:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
			:Oh my, I never got back to you {{ping|HughD}}! So sorry about that! I don't have the source on hand, but I'll see if I can get you a copy as soon as I get the chance. I'm doing some research on a related topic right now, and then I'll be heading to bed. Sorry for leaving you hanging a few days ago! If I seem to forget again, poke me :) Thanks for dropping me a note! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 03:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
	== Merger proposal: Catholic abuse cases ==
			== Edit summary ==
	Hi Mann jess
	I have proposed a merger of the article you created, ] into a much more comprehensive article with which it has a high degree of overlap. Regards, ] (]) 15:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
			It's been discussed ad nauseam on the talk page. This is clearly a ] POV. The vast overwhelming number of sources don't use this term. Per ], we are not supposed to use this term unless widely used by ]. And I hate to remind you that the burden of proof is on those wishing to restore contentious BLP content, not the other way around. Let's just follow the rules, OK? ] (]) 04:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
	:Thanks for the notice! I've been on vacation, but I contributed to the talk page. I appreciate your input :) &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 02:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
			:1) The sources that matter are the most reliable, and most reflective of the academic consensus. That means a book by Mann is more significant than an article on the Guardian.
			:2) We have a large list of reliable sources which back up the wording proposal. I haven't seen any that contend Mann has not characterized the blog in this way. I also haven't seen any that contend it isn't what he characterizes it to be.
			:3) It is not a fringe POV that ''Watts Up With That?'' is a blog dedicated to climate change denial. Your usage of "climate change skepticism" means the same thing with different words. Your concern (as you've expressed it) is not that the content is fringe, but that the ''language'' we've used is inappropriate. That doesn't qualify as fringe.
			:4) Yes, this has been discussed to death, and if any consensus has resulted, it has been that the content is reliable and appropriate.
			:5) Your version of the article fails to reflect the mainstream scientific opinion regarding Watts' views, which is, itself, a ] and ] violation.
			:6) "Climate change denial" is not a word to watch. "Denier" is. Climate change denial is the common name used to describe a subject this blog is known to espouse. We are not saying "Anthony Watts is a denier". We are saying "Mann has characterised his blog as the most prominent website about climate change denial on the internet", an opinion which is widely held.
			:{{ping|A Quest For Knowledge}} We've worked together positively in the past. I don't know what's led up to this disagreement, but I'm looking at it with a fresh perspective, and your approach is pushing it towards being intractable. Editors who would agree with you on this issue also by and large would support keeping out any mention of the scientific consensus about climate change, and representing Watts' opinion unchallenged. You are siding with those who would advocate for climate change denial, a fringe and pseudoscientific view, and that's a side I'm not familiar with you being on. If things continue in this direction, it looks like we'll be needing more formal means of dispute resolution. Right now, the article is a massive fringe and weight violation, and it can't stay that way. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 05:24, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
			::I'm sorry, but I believe that you have misread the situation. The key issue here is '''what do reliable sources say about this topic'''? Or to put it another way, '''what do the majority of reliable sources say about this topic'''? Nobody is disputing that Mann is reliable source (or at least I'm not). But we don't look as sources in isolation. We look at the totality of sources. And even when using Google Scholar, the vast, overwhelming majority of scholarly sources don't use the term "denier". There is no "''large list of reliable sources which back up the wording proposal''". There's just a small handful.
	== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==
			::What I am saying is that the term, "denier" is a fringe term because the majority of sources don't use this term. We should follow the majority.
			::Guilt by association is a logical fallacy. I have no interest in disputing the scientific consensus about global warming. What I am taking an issue with is the use of the word "denier", that's all. Will you work with me to figure out a way to add a link to the ] without using the term "denial"? I believe that Dave had a reasonable solution. Can we pursue that further? ] (]) 05:52, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
			:::We're not discussing the word "denier". We're discussing the subject "climate change denial". Words aren't used in isolation, either. I'm fine with Dave's suggestion. I'm not fine with removing reliably sourced content, placing the article back in a state where it contravenes our policies. If you want to add Dave's suggestion, I'd be fine with that, but right now you're removing the single and only mention of the scientific consensus in the entire article. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 06:07, 23 May 2015 (UTC)0
	] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
	{|cellspacing=10 style="background-color:transparent;"
			::::There is already two WikiLinks to the ] in the article. ] (]) 06:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
			:::::The only links we have are there because today. Previous attempts to add them have , including . &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 06:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
			:::::::And despite the links I just added, there is still no prose indicating the scientific consensus. We were adding some, but it was reverted. The first link to ] is hidden in an uncontested fringe claim by Watts, in clear violation of ] &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 06:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
			==Discretionary sanctions re climate change==
			{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''
			'''Please carefully read this information:'''
			The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ].
			Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
			}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->
			Apologies if this has already been received. I searched but failed to find it on talk history, system log, etc. ] (]) 16:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
			:Yes, I'm aware. Thanks. In fact, we should place this as a note in the edit window of the page. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 16:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
			== Barnstar ==
			{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
			|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}}
			|rowspan="2" |
			|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Editor's Barnstar'''
	|-		|-
			|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank you for your excellent work on pages related to ]. I had nearly given up hope before you arrived. ] (]) 14:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
	|valign=top|
	;Stubs:<!--''']:'''-->
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	:]
	|align=top|
	;Cleanup
	:]
	:]
	:]
	;Merge
	:]
	:]
	:]
	;Add Sources
	:]
	:]
	:]
	;Wikify
	:]
	:]
	:]
	;Expand
	:]
	:]
	:]
	|}		|}
			:Thank you! I appreciate the kind words! :) It looks like we're all having a positive impact on the topic. Thanks for the help! I've really appreciated your input on the talk page, in particular! That's really that hard part! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 14:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
	SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping.
			::Long game, I think, will be our best bet. Seeing all the sleeper socks come out of the woodwork is really interesting. ] (]) 02:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
			:::Yep. These things die down over time. I requested full protection for a few days, which would help to encourage filling up the talk page instead of the article and prevent rampant violations of our policies in the meantime. It shouldn't be a big problem long-term. I'm just hoping we can avoid having to go to ani or ae, if we can. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 04:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
			::::Good work! One small point, did you mean to ? You might wish to undo that part of your edit. . . . . ], ] 23:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
			:::::Whoops! Sorry about that. I really have no idea how that snuck in there. All fixed now. Thanks for letting me know! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 00:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
			== My edit ==
	If you have '''feedback''' on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on ]. Thanks from {{User0|Nettrom}}, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- ] (]) 22:55, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
			It is generally poor form to edit anyone else's comment. I didn't change yours, but I did move it to a separate section, to avoid a thread argument within a section. If you think it is better to have a thread discussion within the section let's discuss.--]] 17:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
	== GOCE 2012 Annual Report ==
			:I don't know why we need 4 subsections in order to list sources, nor why two separate comment sections would ever be required. But whatever you want to do... &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 18:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ]'''</span>
			== ==
			If you look at the date of the Facebook posting, you will see that in fact the lawsuit seems to be inactive. We've discussed before that Mann's activist FB postings as a public figure are RSs for his own opinions and activities. ] (]) 17:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
			:<s>I don't doubt that the lawsuit is inactive; indeed, I think it is.</s> I believe you when you say the suit is inactive. But a facebook post isn't a reliable source generally, and there's especially a problem when the idea of citing a post which says the suit is active for the claim it is inactive, based only on the date of the post. If it has been inactive for several years, we could surely find a proper RS to back it up. It's probably best to err on the side of avoiding misinformation rather than providing poorly sourced information, IMO. Thanks for dropping me the note about it! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 17:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
			::Maybe in a spirit of collegiality you could let Tillman know your edit summary was too strong. ''That "source" says the exact opposite'' clearly implies the source says the suit is active, which you admit here is not so. I agree the fact is not currently essential to the BLP. Best wishes, ] (]) 20:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
			:::Hmm. I think I may not have been clear enough. I meant to say: "I don't doubt the lawsuit is probably inactive, but I haven't seen a source indicating it is. The facebook post says the lawsuit is still active, so it doesn't back up the claim that it's inactive." Have I misread the facebook post? I'll take a look at it again if you got the opposite impression from it than I did; perhaps it's just my reading comprehension. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 20:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
			::::* I hadn't noticed this, but in fact my edit was pretty weak (absence of evidence /= EofA), so I wasnt sorry to be called on it.
			::::Yopienso, thanks for the kind words. Someday we'll get the "Climate Warrior" stuff to stick! But, for a start, I'll try again on Mann's "State Penn" lawsuit..... RSN! Cheers, ] (]) 02:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
			==Surface stations==
			Thanks for the work you're doing on this, I suggest adding the following ref but don't know if you want it in a harv format. regards, ], ] 18:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC) <br>ref name="Menne Williams Palecki 2010">{{cite journal | last=Menne | first=Matthew J. | last2=Williams | first2=Claude N. | last3=Palecki | first3=Michael A. | title=On the reliability of the U.S. surface temperature record | journal=J. Geophys. Res. | publisher=Wiley-Blackwell | volume=115 | issue=D11 | year=2010 | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013094 | doi=10.1029/2009jd013094 | accessdate=27 May 2015}} </ref date: 8 June 2010
			:Hi Dave. Thanks for the source! I added it to the article to back up the current content. Are you aware if this was an additional study beyond the ones we're already citing (i.e. NOAA)? If so, we may be able to add something about NOA's findings being supported by other research. I wasn't 100% sure on that, so I left out any new prose for right now, but let me know if you have thoughts on the matter. Thanks! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 18:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
			::Mann p. 72 "scientists of ", refs 62, notes p. 284 refers to this paper. . . ], ] 19:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
			::Also, from the leading historian on the topic:
			* {{cite web |last=Weart |first=Spencer R. |authorlink=Spencer R. Weart |work= The Discovery of Global Warming | title=The Modern Temperature Trend | publisher=American Institute of Physics | date= February 2015 | url=http://www.aip.org/history/climate/20ctrend.htm#M_48b_ |quote=Regardless of what had happened in past centuries, the warming since the 19th century was now as certain a fact as anything in science. A few critics continued to seek confirmation of their denial of the warming in data on air temperatures from weather stations and satellites. In particular, former TV weatherman Anthony Watts established a popular website…… | accessdate=31 May 2015}}
			::Worth reading on, he also cites Menne (2010). . . . ], ] 19:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
			:::Hmm, that one is good as well. I tried to fit it into our existing coverage, which it seems to compliment nicely; Mann, etc, didn't go into detail about why the bias wouldn't impact results even if present, but Weart did. Thanks for tracking it down, it was an interesting read! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 20:32, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
			::::Thanks, I see you've not quoted the point about denial of the warming in data, which ties in with Mann's assessment of the purpose of the project, and Powell p. 136 "deniers say that the U.S. historical temperature record is unreliable" etc.. In my view the section should start with that context.<br> I've added a quote to the WUWT talk page from {{cite book | last=Watts | first=Anthony | title=Is the U.S. surface temperature record reliable? : how do we know global warming is a problem if we can't trust the U.S. temperature record? | publisher=The Heartland Institute | location=Chicago, IL | year=2009 |url=https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/surfacestationsreport_spring09.pdf | isbn=978-1-934791-29-5 | pages=front and back covers, p. 2}} which rather differs from his more recent announcement about his views...has he recanted? . . ], ] 22:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
			::::p.s. I'm not sure I fully follow Weart's wording about the effect of the bias, so worth checking it against Menne (2010) . . ], ] 22:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
			:::::Actually, I did quote the part about denial initially, but removed it just before saving. I know my quotes from sources have been getting longer and longer, and I figured that part was already covered by other sources anyway. I'm certainly not averse to playing musical chairs with the sources; if we need to swap or replace any of them, let's do that! I want to expand our coverage using them once I've finished cleaning them all up. Regarding Watts' stance, if he's changed his opinion, we should cover it. I'll look over that source and see what I find. Thanks, Dave! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 00:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
			::::::On the first point, in my opinion Weart is respected and independent, and though brief, is a very high quality source for Watts' "denial of the warming in data". Slightly indirect, and as the cite from Watts himself shows the denial is aimed at undermining the credibility of warming data, not outright saying there's no warming, but that's a position covered in ]. Fair point about using the other sources first. . . ], ] 06:23, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
			::::::p.s. the Menne paper was first published 8 June 2010. by Joe D’Aleo and Anthony Watts, UPDATED, AUGUST 27, 2010, "The startling conclusion that we cannot tell whether there was any significant 'global warming' at all in the 20th century is based on numerous astonishing examples of manipulation and exaggeration of the true level and rate of 'global warming." . .], ] 07:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
			{{od}} Hope you don't mind, but I found WaPo sources on the BEST issue, covering the TOBS factor, and got puzzled about the timing: Watts' own blog cleared that up. So, I've edited it with additional sources, and split the BEST issue into a subsection. I'm not wedded to having that subsection, and wouldn't mind it being incorporated back into the parent Surface Stations section. One minor amusement, the citation formatting tool dates the WUWT Publications and Projects page 4 Aug 2012, but the only date shown is the current month above the calender at the bottom of the page. Perhaps a bit slow to update his page! . . ], ] 21:09, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
			:Nice job, Dave! I hope you haven't been discouraged by my reduced participation the last few days; I've been trying to hold myself back from making any content additions until all the drama dies down; resolution at AE will be helpful. It's been a hard goal, since I've now read a chunk of every one of our sources (and then some), and I was looking forward to better incorporating them. It looks like you've done a good job with that section! Thanks for keeping me involved! :) &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 05:58, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
			== Directed at whom? ==
			Jess,
			is addressed to someone named Peter. I think it is a mistake, but checking here to see if you were actually responding to me.--]] 13:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
			:My apologies. That reply was intended for you. I was thinking your name was Peter for some reason; it was pretty late at the time, so I'll just blame it on me being tired. ;) Thanks for correcting me. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 13:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
			::Apropos of nothing, my (late) brother's name is Peter. No problems, but I once responded (heatedly) to a message I thought was directed at me, then learned I was wrong, so I try to make sure I don't misread.--]] 15:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
			== NEED your help, please! ==
			Hi Jess,
			Thanks for your kind message. I would appreciate you help, please. I am an editor and am working to update and re-arrange poorly displayed or poorly organized information on some articles. I have started with the Ben Carson page, NOT the Ben Carson presidential campaign, 2016 page. The first section I tried to update is in his Medical Career section, the Medal and awards sub-section. It does not mention his 2008 Lincoln Medal from Ford's Theatre. I tried to add that, with two citations, understanding that this page is semi-protected. Also, I tried to re-arrange the existing information there already since it is not reader-friendly. All I wanted to do is display the info with bullet points. I THINK I created the revisions correctly and clicked Save as needed, but I'm not sure I did it correctly since it has been over 24 hours since I tried the update as Ljhammond14 but no updates are evident yet. Do you know how to look to see if my request to edit is in a 'waiting room' or some preliminary area? Perhaps I didn't Save correctly or at the right time. I'm a little confused and if you can help me I would be very grateful!!! I suppose I need to come back here to read your reply......or perhaps it will show up on my Talk page for Ljhammond14. THANKS for any way you can help me!!!
			] (]) 11:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
			:{{ping|Ljhammond14}} Hi! Thanks for dropping me a line! It looks like you were editing ], and you've managed to figure out how to make an edit request. That's awesome! It takes a little getting used to how some of this all works, and that can be one of the more confusing processes. I'm not familiar with that page at all (nor am I really familiar with Ben Carson), so I can't be much help in deciding how to present information on that page. But, your requests seem pretty reasonable to me, so I'm sure other editors will pop in and help out with them. I did complete the first one for you (the addition of the lincoln medal), since that addition seemed pretty straightforward. I'll leave the other two for regular editors on that page, since they might have more input on the subject area. Your best bet is just to discuss the issues with other editors on that page and see if you can collaborate to make improvements. Thanks for your suggestions! If you have any other trouble, feel free to drop me another line. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 04:47, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
			Hi, Jess,
			Somehow it is reassuring to be communicating with a fellow human out here in the big, bad land of Misplaced Pages (it's not really big and bad!) Thanks for your approval of the award Lincoln Medal edit. Will that just show up by magic and be live or will some other process come about? Yes, it was a bit daunting to figure out the Request for an Edit process but I tried to be patient and read and read and read. :-) There are some issues with the Carson page but I've already posted a fix for the birth order of their 3 sons. Ben Jr. was born second, not first. Do you have any words of wisdom for me? There are a few more corrections I need to make but if you say just take it easy, slowly, a little at a time, that works or me. I can be patient if I need to be. (really, more patient with myself than anything.) Thanks again for your encouragement and I'll listen to all the advice you care to share. Happy weekend! Lois
			] (]) 07:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
			== GOCE June 2015 newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] June 2015 News'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	<center>
	The GOCE has wrapped up another successful year of operations!
			''']:''' Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 38 people who signed up, 29 copyedited at least one article, and we got within 50 articles of our all-time low in the backlog. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
	Our ''']''' is now ready for review.
			''']''':
			Nominations are open through June 15 for GOCE coordinators, with voting from June 16–30. Self-nominations are welcome and encouraged.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Biblioworm}} and {{noping|Philg88}}.
	– Your project coordinators: ], ], and ]
	</center>
	{{center		{{center
	| <small>'''{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}''' To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 00:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
			] (]) 04:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0428 -->
			<!-- Message sent by User:Miniapolis@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=663382136 -->
			== edit warring ==
			] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
			Please be particularly aware that ] states:
			# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''.
			# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
			If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''{{Break}}''That section as it reads is purely POV, and violates our neutral point of view policy.''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 18:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
			== Suggest revising your complaint at AE ==
			FYI, if I read it correctly, your AE complaint refers to "the article" (or its talk page) without telling the overburdened busy arbs when you jump from referencing the ] article/talk page, to the ] one. It might help the rest of the committee if you inserted some explanatory remarks. In your place I might leave the original text, but use small font to insert <nowiki><small>clarification, here I am refering to the article "_________"</small></nowiki>, but of course there's a million ways to go about it, assuming it needs doing at all. ] (]) 11:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
			:Hey, thanks for the suggestion. I'm not sure whether it's necessary to distinguish between the two, since the content being discussed on both articles is identical. I was trying to focus on the behavior (also identical) across the topic without getting bogged down with details. I think I'll leave it as-is for now, which might be the wrong call, but I think the arbs have probably reviewed the case by now anyway, so we'll see what happens. I appreciate the feedback, though! Thanks. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 14:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
			==Copy and pasting==
			We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's ]. We at Misplaced Pages usually require ]. If you own the copyright to this material please send permission for release under a ] license to '''<code>permissions-en@wikimedia.org</code>''' per ]. great job with attribution, please do a bit more paraphrasing and avoid large block quotes. Friendly reminder. I am not concerned about your edits. Keep up the good work.--] (]) 15:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
			:Hi Lucas. Thanks for the note! is there an edit in particular that caught your attention? I'm on a mobile device until tomorrow, so its tough to check my recent contribs to see which one probably caught your eye, and I can't recall any, besides the direct quotes inside ref tags at anthony watts. I appreciate the input! Thanks. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 06:49, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
			::Okay, back on a normal computer again. {{ping|Lucas559}}, it looks like your bot caught , which is adding a source with a direct quote. The quote is a bit lengthy, but I believe within the purview of fair use, since we are discussing its contents explicitly within the article body, and the quote cannot be reasonably shortened without losing some of that content. I'd recommend, if possible, the bot tried to avoid flagging content within the quote parameter of our citation templates, since that will always be copied from the source and should not be paraphrased. If you review the edit again and feel it is in any way not in compliance with our policies on copyright, ''please'' let me know, and I'll ask our copyright experts if and where I've gone wrong! Thanks! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 17:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
			:::Ah, you're not the bot's owner. I a report. Anyway, thanks again. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 17:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
			==Copyright Violation Detection - EranBot Project==
			A new copy-paste detection bot is now in general use on English Misplaced Pages. Come check it out at the ]. This bot utilizes the ] (ithenticate), unlike ] that relies on a web search API from Yahoo. It checks individual edits rather than just new articles. Please take 15 seconds to visit the ] and check a few of the flagged concerns. Comments welcome regarding potential improvements.
			== Edit Warring??? ==
			Making one (One!) edit is not and can never be considered edit warring. I note that you have engaged in actual edit warring that page WP:3RR. Personal attacks and accusations of other ediotors is entirely inappropriate. Perhaps you should look for a seasoned editor that could mentor you and help you avoid your drift into incivility and further blocks. I frankly expect an apology. ] (]) 17:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
			:Edit warring and 3rr are different things. Another user has been making this change to several pages for a month, but has not engaged in discussion or made an effort to establish consensus for his edit. See the various talk pages for examples, and note the lack of substantive reply between reversions. Your edit jumped into the middle of that dispute to revert, but you made no effort to go to the talk page to discuss it either. Even your edit summary - "Better before" - added nothing to the discussion. Yes, that's edit warring; it is imposing your preferred version via reverting instead of discussion and consensus building. It's really no big deal in this case, I simply asked you to participate in the discussion instead of edit warring. If you're interested in being involved in the discussion, please join it, but if your interest is imposing your preferences via reverting without discussion, please don't do that. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 17:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
			::I take it by this that you are not actually apologizing for calling my ''one'' reversion "Edit warring" nor do you think that your actual improper edit warring is in any sense wrong...OK. I have seen this sort of behavior before, it doesn't usually end well. ] (]) 22:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
			:::AWB, I suggested it might be time for you to take a break from your CC "campaign". Please consider this. As CM noted, it usually doesn't end well. Just a thought, from someone who has seen a lot of this stuff over the years. Best regards, ] (]) 23:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
			::::@CM, no, I'm not going to apologize for asking you not to edit war. Please don't edit war. Yes, jumping into a dispute only to revert without making any effort to participate in the discussion or give a proper rationale for your revert is edit warring. I'm sorry this is apparently offensive to you. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 03:19, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
			:::::You did not ''"ask me not to edit war"'', you accused me of edit warring. I have not engaged in it and my ''one'' edit was not and is not "edit warring" under anyone's definition. Your behavior continues to be uncollegial and uncivil. Your battleground activity is inappropriate, so yes I find it offensive. ] (]) 20:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
			::::::I'm sorry you feel that way. This happened over a month ago, so I had to look into the history to remember the details. Tillman on the 23rd and said "See talk". I responded to him and , pointing to 2 active discussions on the topic. About a day later, you , reinstituting Tillman's change. Your edit summary was "{{tq|better before}}", which does nothing except express a personal preference, and you made no attempt to participate in either discussion. I would have hoped you would have participated in the discussion instead of reverting, or at the very least made an effort to respond to other editors while reverting. When an editor ignores discussion and attempts to institute their preference into the article via reverting alone, I call that "edit warring". I don't think I'm alone in that respect, but you are welcome to call it whatever you'd like. I didn't template you, or warn you in any way, I simply . I believe that was an appropriate request. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 21:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
			== Further reading at CCD ==
			Thanks for cleaning this up. Big improvement! Cheers, ] (]) 19:35, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
			==Wikiproject Environment, Climate Change Task Force invitation==
			{{InviteEnviro}}
			Thank you very much for your recent contributions! Please consider joining our ] and watching the talk page. Thanks again. ] (]) 16:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
			== The Misplaced Pages Library needs you! ==
			]
			We hope ] has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and ''we need your help!''
			With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
			*'''Account coordinators''': help distribute free research access
			*'''Partner coordinators''': seek new donations from partners
			*'''Communications coordinators''': share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
			*'''Technical coordinators''': advise on building tools to support the library's work
			*'''Outreach coordinators''': connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
			*'''Research coordinators''': run reference services
			<br>
			<div style="text-align:center; font-size:larger;">]</div>
			<br/>Send on behalf of ] using ] (]) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:EuroCarGT@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Nikkimaria/BBlist&oldid=670298116 -->
			== Wikinic Buffalo ==
			] is being planned for July 26, 2015. You can find more information here: ]. ] (]) 13:24, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
			::The date has been changed to August 2nd. ] (]) 22:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
			== Your AE filing ==
			Can you split the filing into two separate sections? Just for the sake of clarity and stuff. Would be much appreciated. - ] &#124; <sup>] and ]</sup> 03:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
			:Sure. I wasn't sure which would be the easiest. I'll make an attempt at that. Thanks. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 04:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
			::All done. I hope that helps. If that wasn't what you were hoping for (or you think there's something else I can do to make it easier), let me know! Thanks! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 04:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
			:::That was exactly what I asked, thank you. On a different issue, however: You did not notify ''either'' editors, which you are required to do for valid AE requests. In both requests, add in <code>; Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested : </code>, followed by the notification diff, at the bottom of your initial statement. If you need an idea what the format looks like, look at the editnotice of the AE page, click on ''click this link'', and hit preview. - ] &#124; <sup>] and ]</sup> 06:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
			::::Heh. Yea, it was a long night. They were both aware of the NEG thread (I had notified Tillman already). I just posted to let them both know of the move to a new section. Thanks Penwhale! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 12:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
			== William Lane Craig ==
			The number of times that people refer to William Lane Craig mentioning his educational achievement or mentioning the terms 'Professor of Philosophy' or 'Philosophy Professor' should be noted in making decisions about what to put first in terms of philosopher, apologist, or theologian.
			Moreover, along with the academic book references I have already contributed to the main Misplaced Pages page for William Lane Craig, two additional non-news sources are listed below which describe William Lane Craig as a philosopher and do not mention the words 'apologist', 'Christian apologist', 'theologian' nor 'Christian theologian'. The person responsible for the first source is an atheist. The person responsible for the second source is a Muslim. The only career title given to William Lane Craig in these two sources are as a philosopher.
	== Edit waring ? ==
			*http://infidels.org/library/modern/dan_barker/kalamity.html
	Thanks. I saw your note in the talk page you left about my "vandalism". I was wondering though : why did you say I was edit warring? - I tagged the article, I gave my reasons in the talk page, and someone reverted the tag writing it was vandalism. He or she never participated in the discussion I started; his or her single role was to revert the tag. Who is wrong here? I justified my edits, started a discussion and someone reverted twice without participating in the discussion just calling me a vandal then someone else ( you ) said I was edit warring. Keep in mind that no one else was editing at that time.
			*http://www.hamzatzortzis.com/essays-articles/philosophy-theology/a-philosophical-perspective-on-the-uniqueness-of-the-quran/
	You also suggested that the previous user should leave me a note for editing waring while s'he was actually was edit waring (with no participation and using inappropriate labels.) Can you explain why? Best,
			A blog entry by an atheist cosmologist Sean Carroll states that he is a philosopher and theologian (the word 'apologist' only appears once and only in user comments, and not by Sean Carroll himself, further down the page):
	--] (]) 22:15, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
			*http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2011/04/05/debating-william-lane-craig/
	:Hi Motorola. I'd be happy to answer. Basically, edit warring happens any time an editor repeatedly undoes the changes of other editors. This happens irrespective of discussion, or the content of the changes, or anything else. For instance, if John makes a change to an article, and Jill reverts that change, then John restores it and Jill reverts it again, they are both edit warring. Both of them have an obligation to go to the talk page and discuss the issue, and in the meantime, both editors should stop reverting each other while they talk it over. ] plays a part in edit warring a lot, and it's a generally good principle to follow; if a change you've made is reverted, then you should open discussion on the talk page first... you should not restore your change to the article before there is consensus on the talk page to do so. Many editors (myself included) give the reverting editor ''slightly'' more leeway when it comes to edit warring, because the onus is on the person originally changing the article to establish consensus for his change. There's also some leeway given to either editor in certain cases, such as violations of ], or if one editor is being really combative, or if an editor has tried to collaborate on the talk page already, etc. It can sometimes be subjective, so it's best not to engage in it at all; edit warring is never looked upon favorably, for anyone involved. You should lean on the talk page heavily, and not revert while discussion is ongoing. Does that help explain things? You should skim ] when you have a chance too, since there's a pretty good explanation there as well. All the best, &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 22:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
	::Hi. thanks for taking the time to explain. there is no big deal but I would comprehend better your reasons if the other editor had written something meaningful in the talk page and did not use the term vandalism to describe my edits. But it seems that s/he was just "casting a vote" without having anything to say about the article and the subject which seems to be the case for many "participants" in the homeopathy article in wikipedia - it is generally cool to be anti-homeopathy without having the remotest idea what you are you talking about - and yo refuse to yourself the time to be informed responsibly. One must have the ability to explain in his own words why s/he supports or not a consensus - speaking of which looks very artificial: several editors have expressed their disagreements. Best regards--] (]) 23:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
	::Am I allowed to participate in the discussion homeopathy talk page and answer to your argument? or not? --] (]) 02:29, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
			Similarly, Peter S. Williams, author of , states in multiple blog entries that William Lane Craig is a 'Christian philosopher, theologian and apologist':
	:::Of course! Why wouldn't you be? Just try to engage collaboratively and try to avoid repeating yourself. You're probably worried about the discretionary sanctions notice left on your talk page, right? A good rule of thumb is to avoid behaviors listed in ] (in fact, keep ''far'' away from them), and if you find yourself at an impasse, then ask an uninvolved editor (and take their advice!), or seek ]. Does that make sense? As long as you follow that advice, you should be fine. The only other thing to note is that once you've seen consensus form on an issue, it's time to give that issue up and move on to something else. There's ''plenty'' of stuff to fix and do here. So much, in fact, that it's usually crazy to get caught up on one change. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 02:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
			*
	:::Thanks I have asked 3 times if I can reply to to what you said in the homeopathy page but your last comment in my tal;k page was confusing to me. If I refer to your argument I could be accused for repeating myself ? I m assuming that I have your permission as admin to reply and I will do- If I misunderstood let me know please. --] (]) 03:02, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
			*
			I suspect that most academic in-text citations of William Lane Craig are similar to the format Craig (year) or Craig (year, page number) without any describing words. When published, particularly by philosophers other than William Lane Craig himself, in academic books on topics within philosophy and academic philosophy journals, the ] could suggest that it is best to interpret that author as thinking of William Lane Craig in terms of being a philosopher first unless that philosopher has used another word to describe William Lane Craig in the journal article when first mentioning him, or unless the philosopher is using William Lane Craig's work to make a point unrelated to William Lane Craig's work in philosophy of religion, or perhaps unless that philosopher states that - in citing William Lane Craig - they are attempting to be interdisciplinary in their approach to writing the philosophy article/book and that they believe that William Lane Craig represents a different discipline to philosophy.
	::::You don't need the permission of an admin. The three users you've been speaking with primarily are established users who've been around this block before. Incidentally, I think one user who's given you this advice ''is'' an admin, but that's not really relevant. You can always comment on an article talk page, unless you're explicitly sanctioned not to do so by the community (see ]; that doesn't apply to you). Editors are not warning you to stay off the page. Editors are warning you to work collaboratively and not repeat the same points over and over again without listening. Just be sure not to do that, and you'll be fine. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 04:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
			] (]) 05:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
	== homeopathy edits ==
			== Samuel Soal ==
	Jess, the reason i edited the page as i did is bc wikipedia IS completely controlled by the powers that be and they will not allow information that goes against them on their pages. e.g. i had an incredible healing experience with homeopathy after horrible experiences with western doctors. i wanted to help others, so i posted useful things about my experiences, always couching them with statements such as "anecdotal evidence suggests," or the like. i also included many factual statements such that it has been around in India for thousands of years. i backed everythign up with a study, or with factual evidence, or with history, or with my own personal experiences, and everything was always deleted. they broke their own rules and the moderator essentially vandalized his own page. that's why i wrote what i wrote. is this something that you support ? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:25, 15 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			I failed to revert far enough; that IP changed three times today. My edit summary was meant as a revert to your last, which you just restored. I'll do better next time. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 20:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
	:Hi 24.177.135.228. We have very specific content policies here, which determine how we analyze sources, how we weight them against each other, and consequently what content is appropriate to be placed in articles and how. Personal experience, for example, is not ]. Misplaced Pages is not like many other mediums, such as books, or blogs, or research, or journalism. Each has their own standard, and so do we. I'm not familiar with your work on the homeopathy article, but if you're having trouble getting content included when working with experienced editors, there is probably a reason based on those content policies we have to follow. We do have biases on wikipedia, most notably toward the scientific consensus. That's intentional. If you're looking to compare data and do your own research, then wikipedia isn't the right place to do so. You should look into setting up a website (or blog) of your own, or working on another wiki with different policies, or writing a paper for submission to a journal, or publishing a book of your own. In any case, regardless of how previous discussions have gone, it is ''never'' appropriate to put the type of content you just did into an article. Please don't do that. If you have a dispute, see ]. I hope that helps. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 23:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
			:Heh, I think you misunderstood my edit summary. I wasn't responding to you, I was responding to the ip, who said the content he was adding had been in the article for a long time, and was only recently removed. He was incorrect. You did a fine job, I was just cleaning up a few edits before the last one. :) He keeps hopping ips. Thanks for the message! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 20:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
			::We were (mostly) on the same page - I was merely apologizing for not reverting far enough earlier. I cleaned up a little, but still left a mess behind for you to clean up :-) Have a great day! ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 20:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
	== GOCE mid-drive newsletter, January 2013 ==		== GOCE August 2015 newsletter ==
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"		{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] mid-drive newsletter'''</span>		| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] August 2015 Newsletter'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	<center>
	We are halfway through our ].
			''']:''' Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 24 people who signed up, 17 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
	The ''']''' is now ready for review.
			''']:''' The one-week April blitz, targeting biographical articles that have been tagged for copy editing for over a year, will run from August 16–22. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the article list on the blitz page. ]!
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|KieranTribe}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}}, and {{noping|Pax85}}.
	– Your project coordinators: ], ], and ]
	</center>
	{{center		{{center
	| <small>'''{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}''' To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 00:34, 18 January 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
			::sent by {{noping|Jonesey95}} via ] (]) 14:43, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0443 -->
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=676042276 -->
	==]==
	Hi. You wrote the following line: "it has been expanded substantially, and that it is now a 64-bit application.". I ran a search for "64-bit" in your source (http://www.stanford.edu/group/htgg/cgi-bin/drupal/sites/default/files2/lmzen_2003_1.pdf) and didn't find anything. This source appears to be invalid. However, if I'm wrong, please mention the page number so that the information is easier to find. Thank you.] (]) 14:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
			== Intelligent design ==
	:When I discovered the article today, I just combined the information I found into one paragraph. All the bits that I combined were "sourced", but some of the sources weren't very good (for example linking to forum posts and the like), and I thew those out. That all happened today, so up until now, those statements were verifiable. If there are contentious statements which now need a source, then those parts should be {{tld|cn}} tagged, and someone should try to one down. The pdf I provided goes over the history of the medievia issue in detail, including various responses that the owner has given to the mess, so it should verify many of his other claims, if not the 64-bit issue. If you have trouble finding it, let me know. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 14:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
			I was curious, and discovered that ] has not made a single mainspace edit, only discussed topics on talk pages. Not that there's anything wrong with that, per se, I guess. I put a note on their talk page though, pointing out that they have the ability to edit articles as well. We'll see how that goes. --<span style="color:#111111">‖ ] <sup>]</sup> - <small>]</small></span> ‖ 15:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
	==Disambiguation link notification for January 27==
			:Yep. ] that pop up like this are often not "new" editors. Who knows if that's the case here, but if it isn't, your advice might help him communicate a more concrete proposal. I don't think there's much to worry about now, someone just needs to work with him to learn the ropes, and unfortunately I don't have the time to take it on myself. Thanks for your note! I appreciate it! :) &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 18:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			== October 2015 GOCE newsletter ==
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:48, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	== GodWars ==
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] October 2015 Newsletter'''</span>
	Hi Mann jess, I'd appreciate you taking another look at the ] article, due to a conflict of interest. In particular, the recently removed "History of God Wars" link would have covered the needed citations and much of the deleted content as per ]. ] (]) 09:18, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	:Hi KaVir. I was actually away yesterday, but sure, I'll take a look. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 12:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			''']:''' Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 25 editors who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
	::It's been improved quite a bit yesterday, but a fresh set of eyes certainly can't hurt. ] (]) 13:05, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
			''']:''' The one-week October blitz, targeting ], has just concluded. Of the nine editors who signed up, seven copyedited at least one request; check your talk page for your ]!
	:::Everything seems to be ok now. I made a few changes, but could only find minor adjustments. New sources would allow us to add new content, but I've had trouble finding too many. might be good for that, per ]. Just be careful about the language. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 15:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
			The month-long '''],''' focusing on our oldest backlog articles (June, July, and August 2014) and the October requests, is just around the corner. Hope to ]!
	==Talkback==
	{{talkback|Dougweller|ts=15:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)}}
	] (]) 15:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
			Thanks again for your support; together, we can improve the encyclopedia! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|KieranTribe}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}} and {{noping|Pax85}}.
	== In the beginning ... ==
	{{tyvm}}		{{center
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			] (]) 13:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Miniapolis@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=686876575 -->
			== ] ==
	You and I have disagreed on content and perspective on a couple of occasions now, but you are unfailingly polite and respectful, and you listen to (and respond to) the questions asked. I really appreciate that.
			Hi,<br>
	Just FWIW, I sometimes find myself betwixt and between, and that's not the easiest spot to be in. I'm ''not'' a Fundamentalist, Christian or Jew; just because I accept the ''authority'' of the Bible (as an Orthodox Jew) does not mean that I think everything in it is to be taken literally. (Support from many classical commentators for that.) Do keep that in mind when you read my comments (and I think you already do).
			You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692210171 -->
			== ] 2015 End of Year Report ==
	In parallel to the discussions here, I've recently had a brief colloquy around ] and my insisting on use of BCE/CE there instead of BC/AD. In that case, BCE/CE is certainly more religiously neutral, especially in a Judaism-related article, but my interlocutor is quoting ] against that perspective. That's not a request from me for assistance/intervention there, just an illustration of how different things in different parts of Misplaced Pages end up not working in entirely consistent directions.
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	I'm about to ask you another question over there, but wanted to say "thank you" first. ] (]) 16:07, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] 2015 End of Year Report'''</span>
	:Hi Steven. Thank you for the kind message. I could of course say the same for you; it's been a pleasure disagreeing with you ;) I've been a bit tied up today and haven't really been to my normal wikipedia routine, but if you've asked a question on the talk page, I'll get to it as soon as I have the chance. Anyway, thanks again for the message; these are always encouraging, and provide extra incentive to collaborating better. Talk to you soon! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 02:33, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	::Just to let you know, I'm unwatching this one. I'm tired of it. Hans Adler was polite, no argument. But at the end of the day, the argument is about whether academic usage supersedes common usage. For titles, I'm kind of on the side of common use, but the answer is far from clear-cut, and will differ from article to article. Ultimately, all these names will exist with redirects anyway, so it's not as if they are disappearing from the planet.
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	::I'm starting to get a sense that arguments over article titles are some of the biggest time sinks that exist here, and to the least productive end. For example, there's one going on somewhere around here as to whether US place articles should include the state in the article title. The amount of ink that's been spilled on that, so to speak, is ridiculous.
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
	::I'm thinking about writing an essay on it (probably not until after Passover). I'll show you in draft. I think the single biggest problem, when dealing with NPOV and other fair balance issues, is that with titles, there's just one shot, no second chance to balance. In body text, there is always an opportunity for different opinions or nuances. Here, there's not, so there is every incentive to keep arguing about it, and not much motivation or incentive to compromise. But everyone spending time on that ''should'' (if you will) spend that time editing articles.
	::And that's what I'm going to do—head back to my sandbox. See you around town next time. ] (]) 23:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
			<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">Our ''']''' is now ready for review.</div>
	:::I agree with you. The RM should not have been started so soon. This is a perennial discussion, and unlikely to forseeably end. Your decision to back out is probably the right one. Never get sucked into big discussions when it isn't fun, or you'll burn out. I learned that first on the ] page, where the content isn't even the issue... it's the ''ordering'' of the content... and man those discussions got long. There's another one on ] right now which is huge, debating whether "into" should be capitalized. My approach is !vote, explain, discuss, and then move on. If there's other stuff going on, or other articles in need of attention, that takes priority. I do this intermittently in-between work, though, so it's easier for me to not get entangled. FWIW, that discussion will end "no consensus" and the current title will stay. Anyway, good luck. It was nice meeting you, and I'm sure we'll bump into each other again. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 00:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
			'''Highlights:'''
	==Disambiguation link notification for February 7==
			*Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page;
			*New record lows in the article backlog and on the Requests page;
			*Coordinator election results;
			*Membership news;
			*Changes around the Guild's pages;
			*Plans for 2016.
			<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">– Your project coordinators: {{noping|Jonesey95|Miniapolis|Baffle gab1978}}.</div>
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			{{center
			| <small> To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by {{noping|Jonesey95}} via ] (]) 17:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)</small>
			}}
			|}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=697805063 -->
			== Checking in ==
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:42, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
			I hope you are ok. You have not been active on Misplaced Pages since September of last year. Be cool. :) --<span style="color:#111111">‖ ] <sup>]</sup> - <small>]</small></span> ‖ 02:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
	== "Cryptozoologists" ==
			Jess has been active. Are you his sock puppet account? ] (]) 04:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
	I was lead to ] by the picture on ], which I thought was rather odd to have someone singled out like that on there, mainly I wanted to check the copyright on it since it appeared to be a studio image, in which I've put in a request at Commons to have the OTRS ticket reviewed to see if it includes the release from the studio (Image copyright is sorta one of the things I'm always looking out for, lol.). Anyway, his page seemed rather, strongly pro cryptozoology, which is pretty much bunk science. So I put some tags on the article since it's sourcing is very poor and one-sided, and commented on the talk page. Lo and behold, Mr. Shuker himself lords over the article and chimed in to state his opinion on my comment about it being a doggy science and needing some other views on it. I'm asking your help since you edit on Cryptozoology, to review some of these "zoologists" pages to review them for, (a) ], ], etc.. and (c) if they even meet ] which I'm not sure based on the sourcing that Karl does. Here's a list mr Shuker provided of other cryptozoologists that didn't have any criticism of their work/views on their page. ], ], ], ], and ], along with Karl's page. The way he responded to my comment, and the clear ] of his edits to the page, makes me want to make it a personal mission to address the ] violations on his page. First I think we'll try a round at ] since his ] is highly suspect. —&nbsp;<font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">]]</font> 02:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
			:Yes, Jess has been active. But Mann jess has not. I'm not a sockpuppet, just someone who watches this page. And reverts vandalism and personal attacks. Are you a sockpuppet? --<span style="color:#111111">‖ ] <sup>]</sup> - <small>]</small></span> ‖ 05:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
	:Hey Raeky. Thanks for the note. That does, indeed, sound important to look into. I've been pretty tied up in the last 2 days with Vday and work (as you can probably tell from my lack of contribs), but I'll try to look into it as soon as I have the chance. I'm glad you noticed the problem! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 02:20, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
			::Hey guys. These accounts both belong to the same person. My user page lists this account as an alt of mine (it used to be the opposite). Thanks for the concern! I'm still here! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 05:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
	== GOCE February 2013 newsletter ==
			== Climate forcing, Intro ==
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"
			Dear "Jess"
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] February 2013 events newsletter'''</span>
			I've put some discussive text in the talk section of the 'Radiative forcing' entry, as a reaction to your reversal of my change a few days ago. I would like to hear your opinion on this.
			Best regards
			Torben Schmith
			Senior scientist
			Danish Meteorological Institute, Denmark <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			== ] April 2016 Newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] April 2016 Newsletter'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	<center>
	We are preparing to start our ] and ].
			''']:''' Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 28 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			''']:''' The one-week April blitz, again targeting our long ], will run from April 17–23. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the requests page. ]!
			''']:''' The month-long May backlog-reduction drive, with extra credit for articles tagged in March, April, and May 2015, and all request articles, begins May 1. ]!
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}}, and {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}.
	The ''']''' is now ready for review.
	– Your project coordinators: ], ], and ]
	</center>
	{{center		{{center
	| <small>'''{{red|Sign up for the ] and ]!}}''' To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 23:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
			] (]) 02:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0464 -->
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=713634768 -->
			== June 2016 ] Newsletter ==
	== STOP DELETING MY POSTS IN TALK SESSION ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	I do try to improve the article, by linking to videos where the people the propagandist using as source in the moon hoax article - gets caught as proven liars. I dont care if they dont wanna watch the videos, this dont give you the right to censor my posts! ] (]) 23:58, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] June 2016 News'''</span>
	:Misplaced Pages is ]. The talk pages are for discussing ''specific'' changes to the article, backed up by reliable sources. You started 3 sections in 3 days, all of which revolve around debating the article subject. You've also made it a habit to insult other editors in the process. Please stop. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 00:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	I dont care what you saying, because i do infact improve the article by showing that the ppl the propagandists are using as a source in the article is nothing else than proven liars, how many times must i repeat this fact? never close my topics again, for every time you do so i will open it again. Dictatorship is the wrong way! ] (]) 00:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello everyone, welcome to the June 2016 GOCE newsletter. It's been a few months since we sent one out; we hope y'all haven't forgotten about the Guild! Your coordinators have been busy behind the scenes as usual, though real life has a habit of reducing our personal wiki-time. The May backlog reduction drive, the usual coordinating tasks and preparations for the June election are keeping us on our toes!
	:Edit warring will get you blocked. You need to work collaboratively with other editors on the site. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 00:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
			''']:''' Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's record-setting backlog reduction drive. Of the 29 people who signed up, 16 copyedited at least one article, 197 copyedits were recorded on the drive page, and the copyedit backlog fell below 1,500 for the first time! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
	tell someone who cares? i dont tolerate threats <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			''']''': this one-week copy-editing blitz will occur from 12 June through 18 June; the themes will be '''video games''' and '''Asian geography'''.
	==Kingston High School, Hull==
	Hi, not sure what was going on here but we appear to have been both trying to fix up this one at the same time. The page was at the correct title before it was moved as UK schools use comma as the delimiter and not brackets. I have restore it to the comma version after a few attempts. ] (]) 18:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
			''']''':
	:Yep, I caught that. I had hoped to find consistency within ] (where hull is the only one with a comma), but I'm not going to waste a bunch of time discussing naming conventions and commas vs parens, so whatever it is now is fine. Thanks for correcting the mixed up move, in any case. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 18:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
			It's election time again; how quickly they seem to roll around! '''Nominations''' for the next tranche of Guild coordinators, who will serve a six-month term that begins at 00:01 UTC on 1 July and ends at 23:59 UTC on 31 December, opens at 00:01 UTC on 1 June and closes at 23:59 UTC on 15 June. '''Voting''' takes place between 00:01 UTC on 16 June and 23:59 UTC on 30 June. If you'd like to assist behind the scenes, please consider stepping forward; self-nominations are welcomed and encouraged. All Misplaced Pages editors in good standing are eligible; remember it's '''your''' Guild, and it doesn't run itself!
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}} and {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}.
	== baptism ==
			{{center
	Hey, I don't appreciate the pedantry. I gave the source (Luther's Small Catechism), any idiot can look up what it says in that small book in the section on baptism and see I gave a VERBATIM quote. If you wanted a citation added, why not add it yourself Mr Wiki-expert, instead of deleting FACTS? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|} ] (]) 03:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=723767988 -->
			== ] July 2016 News ==
	:I assume you're talking about . No source was provided in that edit; you added new text without a new reference. What source says that Martin Luther "clearly" held to Baptismal regeneration. In addition, there are issues with your wording which would need to be addressed before we added information like that. We can't end a well sourced paragraph with text like "However.... Clearly..." in wikipedia's voice. The next step is to take your concerns about the paragraph to the article talk page, which you can find at the top left of the article. I'd be happy to discuss the issue with you further there. Please don't ]. Thanks. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 20:44, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	== You are wrong ==
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] July 2016 News'''</span>
	Im not "Vandalizing", I'm simply adding a much needed spice to this lowlife, already untreatable realm of binary numbers we call Misplaced Pages. Who put you in charge? Oh my mistake, NOBODY. The internet is a place to roam free for all without restriction of addition and speech. ] (]) 02:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
	:Someone blocked him. ] (]) 08:44, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
	::Yep. This message came after I reported him to ARV. He got blocked immediately after. I figured it wasn't worth responding to. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 16:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	Misplaced Pages is full of shit i got blocked when i tried to improve the moon hoax article which contains 90% personaly opinions and misleading bullshit, besides that many of my posts in the talk session(!) is censored and the article itself is protected by admins (edit = ban) ] (]) 16:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello everyone, and welcome to the July 2016 GOCE newsletter. <!-- summary here if you wish -->
	:You're in danger of being blocked now because you are not adhering to ] and ]. It has nothing to do with your ideas, or censorship, or some ]. There are perfectly collaborative ways of engaging editors with whom you disagree regarding article improvement, and you need to look at how other editors do that. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 18:02, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
			''']''': this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 12 through 18 June; the themes were '''video games''' and '''Asian geography'''. Of the 18 editors who signed up, 11 removed 47 articles from the backlog. Barnstars and rollover totals are located ]. Thanks to all editors who took part.
	you mean by misleading the viewers in both the talk session as well in the article? yes i maybe gonna do that too! ] (]) 00:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
			''']''':
	== GOCE news: February 2013 ==
			The second tranche of Guild coordinators for 2016, who will serve a six-month term until 23:59 UTC on 31 December, have been elected.
			{{noping|Jonesey95}} remains as your drama-free Lead Coordinator, and {{noping|Corinne}} and {{noping|Tdslk}} are your new assistant coordinators. For her long service to the Guild, {{noping|Miniapolis}} has been enrolled in the ]. Thanks to everyone who voted in the election; our next scheduled one occurs in ]. All Misplaced Pages editors in good standing are eligible; self-nominations are welcome and encouraged.
			''']''':
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"
			Our month-long July Copy Editing Backlog Elimination Drive is now underway. Our aim is to remove articles tagged for copy-edit in '''April''', '''May''' and '''June 2015''', and to complete all requests on the ] from '''June 2016'''. The drive ends at 23:59 on 31 July 2016 (UTC).
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Corinne}} and {{noping|Tdlsk}}.
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] wrap-up'''</span>
			{{center|<big>]</big>
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}] (]) 03:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=727527227 -->
			== ] September 2016 News ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] September 2016 News'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	'''Participation:''' Out of 19 people who signed up for this blitz, 9 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			Hello everyone, and welcome to the September 2016 GOCE newsletter.
			]
			''']''': The July drive was a roaring success. We set out to remove '''April, May, and June 2015''' from our backlog (our 149 oldest articles), and by 23 July, we were done with those months. We added '''July 2015''' (66 articles) and copy-edited 37 of those. We also handled all of the remaining Requests from June 2016. Well done! Overall, we recorded copy edits to 240 articles by 20 editors, reducing our total backlog to 13 months and 1,656 articles, the second-lowest month-end total ever.
			''']''': this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 21 through 27 August; the theme was '''sports-related articles''' in honor of the 2016 Summer Olympics. Of the eight editors who signed up, five editors removed 11 articles from the backlog. A quiet blitz – everyone must be on vacation. Barnstars and rollover totals are located ]. Thanks to all editors who took part.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Corinne}} and {{noping|Tdlsk}}.
			{{center|<big>]</big>
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			] (]) 05:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=738093358 -->
			== Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity ==
			Hello! There is currently a ] of a bot to manage the ] ] by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the ]. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be ''uncontroversially'' removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at ]. Thank you! ] (]) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:MusikAnimal@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:MusikBot_II/Inactive_MMS_targets&oldid=748573976 -->
			== ] December 2016 News ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] December 2016 News'''</span>
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello everyone, and welcome to the December 2016 GOCE newsletter. We had an October newsletter all set to go, but it looks like we never pushed the button to deliver it, so this one contains a few months of updates. We have been busy and successful!
			{{center|]}}
			'''Coordinator elections for the first half of 2017''': Nominations are open for ''']'''. Please visit the election page to nominate yourself or another editor, and then return after December 15 to vote. Thanks for participating!
			''']''': The September drive was fruitful. We set out to remove '''July through October 2015''' from our backlog (an ambitious 269 articles), and by the end of the month, we had cut that pile of oldest articles to just 83. We reduced our overall backlog by 97 articles, even with new copyedit tags being added to articles every day. We also handled 75% of the remaining Requests from August 2016. Overall, 19 editors recorded copy edits to 233 articles (over 378,000 words).
			''']''': this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 16 through 22 October; the theme was ''']''', since the backlog was getting a bit long. Of the 16 editors who signed up, 10 editors completed 29 requests. Barnstars and rollover totals are located ]. Thanks to all editors who took part.
			''']''': The November drive was a '''record-breaker!''' We set out to remove '''September through December 2015''' from our backlog (239 articles), and by the end of the month, we had cut that pile of old articles to just 66, eliminating the two oldest months! '''We reduced our overall backlog by 523 articles, to a new record low of 1,414 articles''', even with new tags being added to articles every day, which means we removed copy-editing tags from '''over 800 articles'''. We also handled all of the remaining Requests from October 2016. Officially, 14 editors recorded copy edits to 200 articles (over 312,000 words), but over 600 articles, usually quick fixes and short articles, were not recorded on the drive page.
			'''Housekeeping note:''' we do not send a newsletter before every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add ''']''' to your Watchlist.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Corinne}} and {{noping|Tdslk}}.
			{{center|<big>]</big>
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			] (]) 00:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=753323738 -->
			== ] February 2017 News ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] February 2017 News'''</span>
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello everyone, and welcome to the February 2017 GOCE newsletter. The Guild has been busy since the last time your coordinators sent out a newsletter!
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
			''']''': This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 11 through 17 December; the themes were ''']''' and eliminating the November 2015 backlog. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine editors completed 29 articles. Barnstars and rollover totals are located ]. Thanks to all who took part.
			''']''': The January drive was a great success. We set out to remove '''December 2015 and January and February 2016''' from our backlog (195 articles), and by 22 January we had cleared those and had to add a third month (March 2016). At the end of the month we had almost cleared out that last month as well, for a total of 180 old articles removed from the backlog! '''We reduced our overall backlog by 337 articles, to a low of 1,465 articles''', our second-lowest month-end total ever. We also handled all of the remaining requests from December 2016. Officially, 19 editors recorded 337 copy edits (over 679,000 words).
			''']:''' The one-week February blitz, focusing on the remaining ] and ], ran from 12 to 18 February. Seven editors reduced the total in those two backlog segments from 32 to 10 articles, leaving us in good shape going in to the March drive.
			'''Coordinator elections for the first half of 2017''': In December, ''']''' were elected. Jonesey95 stepped aside as lead coordinator, remaining as coordinator and allowing Miniapolis to be the lead, and Tdslk and Corinne returned as coordinators. Thanks to all who participated!
			Speaking of coordinators, '''congratulations to {{noping|Jonesey95}}''' on their well-deserved '''induction into the ]'''. The plaque reads: "For dedicated service as lead coordinator (2014, 1 July – 31 December 2015 and all of 2016) and coordinator (1 January – 30 June 2015 and 1 January – 30 June 2017); exceptional template-creation work (considerably streamlining project administration), and their emphasis on keeping the GOCE a drama-free zone."
			'''Housekeeping note:''' We do not send a newsletter before every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add ''']''' to your watchlist.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Corinne}} and {{noping|Tdslk}}.
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
			{{center|<small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>}}
			|}
			] (]) 07:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=763150211 -->
			== editing suggestions ==
			Can I make suggestions for a page as opposed to editing it myself ?
			And where would I do that.
			] (]) 00:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
			:{{ping|Howardpearce}} Yes, you absolutely can! Click on the "Talk" link at the top left of any page, and you'll find a place that is devoted just to discussion about the article with other editors. There, you can create a new section (just like you did here!) and suggest a change for other editors to discuss. I'm not altogether too active nowadays, but feel free to reach out if you have any trouble. All the best, &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 00:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
			== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
			{{Ivmbox|Hello, Mann jess. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
			If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
			|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=813406947 -->
			== ] December 2017 News ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] December 2017 News'''</span>
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello copy editors! Welcome to the December 2017 GOCE newsletter, which contains nine months(!) of updates. The Guild has been busy and successful; your diligent efforts in 2017 has brought the backlog of articles requiring copy edit to '''below 1,000 articles for the first time'''. Thanks to all editors who have contributed their time and energy to help make this happen.
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
			Our copy-editing drives (month-long backlog-reduction drives held in odd-numbered months) and blitzes (week-long themed editing in even-numbered months) have been very successful this year.
			''']''': We set out to remove '''April, May, and June 2016''' from our backlog and all '''February 2017 ]''' (a total of {{#expr:248+56}}&nbsp;articles). By the end of the month, all but 22 of these articles were cleared. Officially, of the 28 who signed up, 22&nbsp;editors recorded 257 copy edits (439,952 words). (These numbers do not always make sense when you compare them to the overall reduction in the backlog, because not all editors record every copy edit on the drive page.)
			''']''': This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 16 through 22 April; the theme was '''Requests'''. Of the 15 who signed up, 9&nbsp;editors completed 43&nbsp;articles (81,822 words).
			''']''': The goals were to remove '''July, August, and September 2016''' from the backlog and to complete all '''March 2017 Requests''' (a total of {{#expr:286+14}}&nbsp;articles). By the end of the month, '''we had reduced our overall backlog to an all-time low of 1,388 articles'''. Of the 28 who signed up, 17 editors completed 187 articles (321,810 words).
			''']''': This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 18 through 24 June; the theme was '''Requests'''. Of the 16 who signed up, 9 editors completed 28 copy edits (117,089 words).
			'''2017 Coordinator elections''': In June, ''']''' were elected. Jonesey95 moved back into the lead coordinator position, with Miniapolis stepping down to remain as coordinator; Tdslk and Corinne returned as coordinators, and Keira1996 rejoined after an extended absence. Thanks to all who participated!
			''']''': We set out to remove '''August, September, October, and November 2016''' from the backlog and to complete all '''May and June 2017 Requests''' (a total of {{#expr:216+26}} articles). The drive was an enormous success, and the target was nearly achieved within three weeks, so that '''December 2016''' was added to the "old articles" list used as a goal for the drive. By the end of the month, only ''three'' articles from 2016 remained, and for the second drive in a row, the backlog was reduced to a new all-time low, this time to '''1,363 articles'''. Of the 33 who signed up, 21 editors completed 337 articles (556,482 words).
			''']''': This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 20 through 26 August; the theme was '''biographical articles tagged for copy editing for more than six months''' (47&nbsp;articles). Of the 13 who signed up, 11 editors completed 38 copy edits (42,589 words).
			''']''': The goals were to remove '''January, February, and March 2017''' from the backlog and to complete all '''August 2017 Requests''' (a total of {{#expr:306+32}}&nbsp;articles). Of the 19 who signed up, 14 editors completed 121 copy edits (267,227 words).
			''']''': This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 22 through 28 October; the theme was '''Requests'''. Of the 14 who signed up, 8 editors completed 20 articles (55,642 words).
			''']''': We set out again to remove '''January, February, and March 2017''' from the backlog and to complete all '''October 2017 Requests''' (a total of {{#expr:174+33}}&nbsp;articles). By the end of the month, these goals were reached and '''the backlog shrank to its lowest total ever, 997 articles''', the first time it had fallen under one thousand (click on the graph above to see this amazing feat in graphical form). It was also the first time that the oldest copy-edit tag was less than eight months old. Of the 25 who signed up, 16 editors completed 159 articles (285,929 words).
			'''2018 Coordinator elections''': Voting is open for the ''']'''. Please visit the election page to vote between now and December 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Thanks for participating!
			'''Housekeeping note:''' We do not send a newsletter before (or after) every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add ''']''' to your watchlist.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Corinne}}, {{noping|Tdslk}}, and {{noping|Keira1996}}.
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
			{{center|<small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>}}
			|}
			] (]) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=816312443 -->
			== GOCE February 2018 news ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] February 2018 News'''</span>
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Welcome to the February 2018 GOCE newsletter in which you will find Guild updates since the ]. We got to a great start for the year, holding the backlog at nine months. 100 requests were submitted in the first 6 weeks of the year<!--everything submitted before Feb 12--> and were swiftly handled with an average completion time of 9&nbsp;days.
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
			'''Coordinator elections''': In December, ''']''' were elected. Jonesey95 remained as lead coordinator and Corrine, Miniapolis and Tdslk as assistant coordinators. Keira1996 stepped down as assistant coordinator and was replaced by Reidgreg. Thanks to all who participated!
			'''End of year reports''' were prepared for ''']''' and ''']''', providing a detailed look at the Guild's long-term progress.
			''']''': We set out to remove '''April, May, and June 2017''' from our backlog and all '''December 2017 ]''' (a total of {{#expr:262+13}}&nbsp;articles). As with previous years, the January drive was an outstanding success and by the end of the month all but 57 of these articles were cleared. Officially, of the 38 who signed up, 21&nbsp;editors recorded 259 copy edits (490,256&nbsp;words).
			''']''': This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 11 through 17 February, focusing on '''Requests''' and the last articles tagged in '''May 2017'''. At the end of the week there were only 14 pending requests, with none older than 20 days. Of the 11 who signed up, 10&nbsp;editors completed 35&nbsp;copy edits (98,538&nbsp;words).
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Corinne}}, {{noping|Tdslk}}, and {{noping|Reidgreg}}.
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
			{{center|<small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>}}
			|}
			] (]) 00:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Miniapolis@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=826897861 -->
			== June 2018 GOCE newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] June 2018 News'''</span>
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Welcome to the June 2018 GOCE newsletter, in which you will find Guild updates since the ].
			Progress continues to be made on the copyediting backlog, which has been reduced to 7&nbsp;months and reached a new all-time low. ''']''' continue to be handled efficiently this year, with 272 completed by the end of May (an average completion time of 10.5&nbsp;days). Fewer than 10% of these waited longer than 20&nbsp;days, and the longest wait time was 29&nbsp;days.
			Misplaced Pages in general, and the Guild in particular, experienced a deep loss with the death on 20 March of ]. Corinne (a GOCE coordinator since 1 July 2016) was a tireless aide on the requests page, and her peerless copyediting is a part of innumerable GAs and FAs. Her good cheer, courtesy and tact are very much missed.
			''']''': The goal was to remove '''June, July and August 2017''' from our backlog and all '''February 2018 Requests''' (a total of {{#expr:202+17}}&nbsp;articles). This drive was an outstanding success, and by the end of the month all but eight of these articles were cleared. Of the 33 editors who signed up, 19 recorded 277 copy edits (425,758&nbsp;words).<!--"official" results taken from the barnstars page-->
			''']''': This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 15 through 21&nbsp;April, focusing on '''Requests''' and the last eight articles tagged in '''August 2017'''. At the end of the week there were only 17 pending requests, with none older than 17&nbsp;days. Of the nine editors who signed up, eight&nbsp;editors completed 22&nbsp;copy edits (62,412&nbsp;words).
			''']''': We set out to remove '''September, October and November 2017''' from our backlog and all '''April 2018 ]''' (a total of {{#expr:271+27}}&nbsp;articles). There was great success this month with the backlog more than halved from 1,449 articles at the beginning of the month to a '''record low of 716 articles'''. Officially, of the 20 who signed up, 15&nbsp;editors recorded 151 copy edits (248,813&nbsp;words).
			''']''': It's election time again. '''Nominations''' for Guild coordinators (who will serve a six-month term for the second half of 2018) have begun, and will close at 23:59&nbsp;UTC on 15&nbsp;June. All Misplaced Pages editors in good standing are eligible, and self-nominations are encouraged. '''Voting''' will take place between 00:01&nbsp;UTC on 16&nbsp;June and 23:59&nbsp;UTC on 30&nbsp;June.
			''']''': Stay tuned for this one-week copy-editing blitz, which will take place in mid-June.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: {{red|Corinne}}, {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Reidgreg}} and {{noping|Tdslk}}.
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
			{{center|<small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>}}
			|}
			] (]) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Miniapolis@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=843371111 -->
			== August GOCE newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] August 2018 Newsletter'''</span>
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			Hello and welcome to the August 2018 GOCE newsletter. Thanks to everyone who participated in the Guild's ''']'''; your new and returning coordinators are listed below. The next election will occur in December 2018; all Misplaced Pages editors in good standing may take part.
			]
			Our ''']''' focused on ] and articles tagged for copy edit in October 2017. Of the eleven people who signed up, eight editors recorded a total of 28 copy edits, including 3 articles of more than 10,000 words. Complete results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			Thanks to everyone who participated in the ''']'''. Of the seventeen people who signed up, thirteen editors completed 194 copy edits, successfully removing all articles tagged in the last three months of 2017. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are ].
			The ''']''' will run for one week, from 19 to 25 August. Sign up now!
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, {{noping|Reidgreg}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}} and {{noping|Tdslk}}.
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
	'''Progress report:''' During the six-day blitz, we removed over twenty articles from the ]. Hope to see you at the ] in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators ], ] and ].
	{{center		{{center
	| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 21:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
			] (]) 22:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0467 -->
			<!-- Message sent by User:Miniapolis@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=853107862 -->
	== What was that WP:T... rule? ==		== December 2018 GOCE newsletter ==
			{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Newsletters/December 2018}}] (]) 17:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
	You reverted me the other day on ] - no problem, I now think you were almost certainly right. It's possibly unimportant, but I was just wondering what was the (], which particular part did you have in mind?):<br><br>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Reidgreg@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=871346080 -->
	Reverted 1 edit by Tlhslobus (talk): Agnosticism is multiple things. We enumerate those based on their weight. However, a parenthetical list like this doesn't improve the article, IMO. ([[WP:T...)
	] (]) 05:56, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
			== GOCE 2018 Annual Report ==
	:Heh. Yea, edit summaries get cut off sometimes. They are limited to a certain number of characters, and I wrote mine too big, it would appear. That link was probably going to go to ] (which is automatically filled in by twinkle whenever I use their tools to perform an undo). It wasn't intended to be a part of my summary. Anyway, I hope that's all clear now. Thanks for the message :) &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 06:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
	::Thanks. ] (]) 22:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	:::np. :) &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 23:40, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] 2018 Annual Report'''</span>
	== GOCE mid-March 2013 newsletter ==
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] mid-drive newsletter'''</span>		<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">Our ''']''' is now ready for review.</div>
			'''Highlights:'''
			*Overview of Backlog-reduction progress;
			*Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page;
			*Membership news and results of elections;
			*Annual leaderboard;
			*Plans for 2019.
			<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">– Your project coordinators:
			{{noping|Miniapolis|Baffle gab1978|Jonesey95|Reidgreg|Tdslk}}.</div>
			{{center
			| <small> To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			] (]) 21:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Reidgreg@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=880573965 -->
			== March GOCE newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] March 2019 Newsletter'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	<center>
	We are halfway through our ].
			Hello and welcome to the March newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2018. All being well, we're planning to issue these quarterly in 2019, balancing the need to communicate widely with the avoidance of filling up talk pages. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
			'''January Drive:''' Thanks to everyone for the splendid work in ]. We removed copyedit tags from all of the articles tagged in our original target months of June, July and August 2018, and by 24 January we ran out of articles. After adding September, we finished the month with 8 target articles remaining and 842 left in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 48<!--in archives--> ] in January. Of the 31 people who signed up for this drive, 24<!--excluding one editor whose attempted c/es weren't adequate --> copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			'''Blitz:''' Thanks to everyone who participated in the ]. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 32 copyedits, including 15 requests. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			'''Progress report:''' As of 23:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 108 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 851 articles.<!--Coords can update or remove this line before sending the newsletter. -->
			'''March Drive''': The month-long ] is now underway; the target months are October and November 2018. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. ]!
			'''Election reminder''': It may only be March but don't forget our mid-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 June. ] normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them ].
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Reidgreg}} and {{noping|Tdslk}}.
	The ''']''' is now ready for review.
	– Your project coordinators: ], ], and ]
	</center>
	{{center		{{center
	| <small>'''{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}''' To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 14:38, 19 March 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
			] (]) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0481 -->
			<!-- Message sent by User:Miniapolis@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=887973248 -->
	== GOCE April 2013 newsletter ==		== GOCE June newsletter ==
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"		{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] wrap-up newsletter'''</span>		| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] June 2019 Newsletter'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	<center>
	We have completed our ].
			Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since March 2019. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below.
	The ''']''' is now ready for review.
			'''Election time:''' Nomination of candidates in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 1 June, and voting will take place from 16 June. ] normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them ].
			'''June Blitz:''' Our ] will soon be upon us; it will begin at 00:01 on 16 June (UTC) and will close at 23:59 on 22 June (UTC). The themes are "nature and the environment" and all ].
			'''March Drive:''' Thanks to everyone for their work in ]. We removed copyedit tags from 182<!--from 'Old articles' count on Barnstar page--> of the articles tagged in our original target months October and November 2018, and the month finished with 64 target articles remaining from November and 811 in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 22<!--marked *R on drive page--> ] in March; the month ended with 34 requests pending. Of the 32 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			'''April Blitz:''' Thanks to everyone who participated in the ]; the blitz ran from 14 to 20 April (UTC) inclusive and the themes were '''Sports and Entertainment'''. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			'''Progress report:''' As of 04:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 267 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stands at 605 articles.<!--Coords can update or remove this line before sending the newsletter. -->
			'''May Drive:''' During the ], Guild copy-editors removed copyedit tags from 191 of the 192 articles tagged in our original target months of November and December&nbsp;2018, and January 2019 was added on 22 May. We finished the month with 81 target articles remaining and a '''record low of 598 articles''' in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 24<!--counted from *R tags on drive page--> ] during the May drive,<!--careful with the wording here; this should reflect the requests completed as part of the drive, not the total requests completed for the month--> and the month ended with 35 requests pending. Of the 26 people who signed up for this drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Reidgreg}} and {{noping|Tdslk}}.
	– Your project coordinators: ], ], and ]
	</center>
	{{center		{{center
	| <small>'''{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}''' To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 19:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
			] (]) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0493 -->
			<!-- Message sent by User:Miniapolis@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=901289089 -->
			== September 2019 GOCE Newsletter ==
	== Edit request for page on Rabindranath Tagore ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	Hi Jess,
	I have made an edit request for the page on Rabindranath Tagore at http://en.wikipedia.org/Rabindranath_Tagore#Translated. The edit request is at http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Rabindranath_Tagore#Tagore.27s_first_work_in_prose_translated_into_English_and_now_available_for_free_should_be_added_to_list_of_translations_with_hyperlink
	Please take a look at my request and let me know your decision.
	] (]) 17:55, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] September 2019 Newsletter'''</span>
	== April 2013 ==
	] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].-] (]) 04:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June&nbsp;2019.
	== With Reference to "Tagore's first work in prose is translated into English" dated 02 Apr 2012 ==
			''']:''' Reidgreg was chosen as lead coordinator, and is being assisted by Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk, and first-time coordinator Twofingered Typist. Jonesey95 took a respite after serving for six years. Thanks to everyone who participated!
	Hi Jess,
	Please take a look at the archived item at http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Rabindranath_Tagore/Archive_2#Tagore.27s_first_work_in_prose_is_translated_into_English titled "Tagore's first work in prose is translated into English". I had recently modified the archived post for your attention. However my edit was deleted by another user because it is an archive. So I am making my detailed request on your UserTalk page directly. The original post was about the possibility of listing the English translation of Rabindranath Tagore's <i>Letters from an Expatriate in Europe</i> with the translations of his other works at http://en.wikipedia.org/Rabindranath_Tagore#Translated. You had said, "Not done: This is a link to a store where you can purchase the ebook. We don't typically link to such sites. See WP:EL for our policies concerning external links. If you are aware of a free site to view the work, we can certainly add that. Thanks!" As it happens I am now aware of a free site to view/download the work in multiple formats. The original web page in question http://smashwords.com/b/147753 has now done away with the price tag and anyone can download the book without even opening an account. Please therefore keep your promise by including "Letters from an Expatriate in Europe" <http://www.smashwords.com/b/147753> translated in 2012 at http://en.wikipedia.org/Rabindranath_Tagore#Translated. Thanks and regards, ~ ] (]) 16:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
			]: From 16 to 22 June, we copy edited articles on the themes of nature and the environment along with ]. 12 participating editors completed 35 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
	== Eris Lover ==
			]: The year's fourth backlog-elimination drive was a great success, clearing all articles tagged in January and February, and bringing the copy-editing backlog to a low of five months and a record low of '''585 articles''' while also completing 48 requests. Of the 30 people who signed up, 29 copyedited at least one article, a participation level last matched in May&nbsp;2015. Final results and awards are listed ].
	I've had a little discussion with Eris Lover about using the talk page, and he has started a discussion there. I think this guy can be a contructive editor, but just needs some time and patience to figure out the ropes here. I put in a kind word about you, and hope that you are successful in explaining to him your objections t his edits. By the way, he sorta has a point. "Tradition", like "nature" and "chemicals", is a word that is skunked and emotive. There must be a way to get the meaning across without using evocative language. Thanks a lot and best of luck! ] (]) 17:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
			]: From 18 to 24 August, we copy edited articles tagged in March&nbsp;2019 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
	:Thanks for talking to him and taking care of things. I've been out of town, and haven't been on WP at all the past few weeks. Come to think of it, this has been the first time away for more than a few days since I started editing :P Anyway, thanks again for stepping in. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 23:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
			'''Progress report:''' As of 03:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 413 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stood at 599 articles, close to our record month-end low of 585.
	== GOCE April 2013 newsletter ==
			''']:''' We are experimenting with automated archiving of copy edit requests; a discussion initiated by ] has resulted in ] writing ] for the Guild. Testing is now underway and is expected to be completed by 3&nbsp;October; for this reason, '''no manual archiving of requests should be done until the testing period is over'''. We will then ] and discuss whether to make this arrangement permanent.
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"
			]: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] April 2013 events newsletter'''</span>
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Reidgreg}}, {{noping|Tdslk}} and {{noping|Twofingered Typist}}.
			{{center
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			] (]) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Reidgreg@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=915561044 -->
			== GOCE December 2019 Newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] December 2019 Newsletter'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
	<center>
	We finished the ] and are preparing to start our ].
	The ''']''' is now ready for review.		Hello and welcome to the December 2019 GOCE newsletter, an update of Guild happenings since the ]. Our Annual Report should be ready in late January.
			]
	– Your project coordinators: ], ], and ]
	</center>
			''']''': Nominations for the election of a new tranche of Guild coordinators to serve for the first half of 2020 will be open from 1 to 15&nbsp;December. Voting will then take place and the election will close on 31&nbsp;December at 23:59 UTC. Positions for Guild coordinators, who perform the important behind-the-scenes tasks that keep our project running smoothly, are open to all Wikipedians in good standing. We welcome self-nominations so please consider nominating yourself if you've ever thought about helping out; it's ''your'' Guild and it doesn't run itself!
			]: Of the thirty-two editors who signed up, twenty-three editors copy edited at least one article; they completed 39 requests and removed 138 articles from the backlog, bringing the backlog to a low of 519 articles.
			''']''': This event ran from 13 to 19 October, with themes of science, technology and transport articles tagged for copy edit, and Requests. Sixteen editors helped remove 29 articles from the backlog and completed 23 requests.
			''']''': Of the twenty-eight editors who signed up for this event, twenty editors completed at least one copy edit; they completed 29 requests and removed 133 articles from the backlog.
			Our ''']''' will run from 15 to 21 December. Sign up now!
			'''Progress report''': From September to November 2019, GOCE copy editors processed 154 requests<!--includes 7 declined or withdrawn-->. Over the same period, the backlog of articles tagged for copy editing was reduced by 41% to an '''all-time low of 479 articles'''.
			'''Request archiving''': The archiving of completed requests has now been automated. Thanks to {{noping|Zhuyifei1999}} and {{noping|Bobbychan193}}, '''{{noping|YiFeiBot}}''' is now archiving the ]. Archiving occurs around 24&nbsp;hours after a user's signature and one of the templates '''{{tl|Done}}''', '''{{tl|Withdrawn}}''' or '''{{tl|Declined}}''' are placed below the request. The bot uses the Guild's standard "purpose codes" to determine the way it should archive each request so it's important to use the ].
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators; {{noping|Reidgreg}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Tdslk}} and {{noping|Twofingered Typist}}.
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
			{{center|<big>]</big>}}
	{{center		{{center
	| <small>'''{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}''' To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 04:25, 26 April 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
			Sent by ] (]) 19:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0507 -->
			<!-- Message sent by User:Reidgreg@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=929270443 -->
			== WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 2019 Annual Report ==
	Mann jess:
	I'm rusty at making wiki edits ... and especially use of "Talk". I did attempt to explain my intentions on the article related to YEC, and hope I wasn't argumentative and/or defensive. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	Mann jess:
	I came across this phrase on your talk page:
	"Tradition", like "nature" and "chemicals", is a word that is skunked and emotive. There must be a way to get the meaning across without using evocative language.
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] 2019 Annual Report'''</span>
	To me, the use of "myth" would also be "skunked and emotive". Try discussing the "Mohammed myth" with a Moslem, and see how that goes, for example. The "Cultural Evolutionist" who first used that word in the article may be thinking in terms of "myth" being a "believe that is a part of the culture, with little or no inference on whether it is true or not".
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	Or "the wiki myth" that forms a core part of the "wiki culture" ... allow as many people as possible to do as much as possible to expand access to knowledge. My understanding is that a "Cultural Evolutionist" would consider the use of "myth" as appropriate. et tu? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">Our ''']''' is now ready for review.</div>
	== No Subject ==
			'''Highlights:'''
	Can you please reply to the post I wrote on my talk page; I think it's relevant to the thread in question.
			*Overview of Backlog-reduction progress (a record low backlog!);
			*Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page;
			*Automated archiving of requests;
			*Membership news and results of elections;
			*Annual leaderboard;
			*Plans for 2020.
			<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">– Your Guild coordinators:
	== Militant Atheism Redirect ==
			{{noping|Jonesey95|Baffle gab1978|Reidgreg|Tdslk|Twofingered Typist}}.</div>
			{{center
			| <small> To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			] (]) 23:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
			}}
			|}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=939397059 -->
			== GOCE March newsletter ==
	I appreciate that there may be a consensus to redirect ] to the ], however there is no logical reason for this redirect. It doesn't make anymore sense than redirecting ] to a specific Roman Catholic order. The redirected page is far too specific, and frankly irrelevant to what Militant atheism actually is. So I changed it, again. It should not redirect there, and I will oppose a redirect as long as I have to to have that page redirected appropriately. As I suggested, maybe make a disambiguation page offering several links as options. Until then, I will keep changing the redirect. It misrepresents new atheists, and it's frankly disgusting that Misplaced Pages editors would accept that simply because there's a "consensus." <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	:Hi Lagoy. Welcome to wikipedia. There's been a lot of discussion over this. You should read the response you got on the talkpage from another editor. The Militant Atheism article has a long history of being misused by certain religious editors to attack atheism. The article previously claimed that New Atheists were trying to censor and possibly even harm religious believers by associating them with historical atrocities. I don't think it would be appropriate to link the term to New Atheism for that reason, and because the two terms are really distinct. "Militant Atheism" is, at best, a disparaging term for outspoken atheists, and is rarely (if ever) used to self describe. The one time it seems to have been used commonly is with respect to the ], which is the reason for the redirect. In any case, please don't ], as you've indicated you might. That won't help, and if you do, it will just end up getting you blocked; it's no good for anyone. Talk it out on the article talk page. Let me know if you need any other help. Thanks! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 14:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] March 2020 Newsletter'''</span>
	== GOCE May drive wrap-up ==
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to the March newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December&nbsp;2019. All being well, we're planning to issue these quarterly in 2020, balancing the need to communicate widely with the avoidance of filling up talk pages. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
			''']''': There was little changeover in the roster of Guild Coordinators, with Miniapolis stepping down with distinction as a ''coordinator emeritus'' while Jonesey95 returned as lead coordinator. The next election is scheduled for June&nbsp;2020 and all Wikipedians in good standing may participate.
			''']''': Thanks to everyone for the splendid work, completing 215 copy edits including 56 articles from the ] and 116 backlog articles from the target months of June to August&nbsp;2019. At the conclusion of the drive there was a '''record low of 323 articles''' in the copy editing backlog. Of the 27 editors who signed up for the drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			''']''': Of the 15 editors who signed up for this one-week blitz, 13 completed at least one copy edit. A total of 32 articles were copy edited, evenly split between the twin goals of requests and the oldest articles from the copy-editing backlog. Full results are ].
			''']''': Currently underway, this event is targeting requests and backlog articles from September to November&nbsp;2019. As of 18&nbsp;March, the backlog stands at a '''record low of 253 articles''' and is expected to drop further as the drive progresses. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Help set a new record and sign up now!
			'''Progress report:''' As of 18 March, GOCE copyeditors have completed 161 requests in 2020 and there was a net reduction of 385 articles from the copy-editing backlog&nbsp;– a 60% decrease from the beginning of the year. Well done and thank you everyone!<!--Coords can update or remove this line before sending the newsletter. -->
			'''Election reminder''': It may only be March but don't forget our mid-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1&nbsp;June. ] normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them ].
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Reidgreg}}, {{noping|Tdslk}} and {{noping|Twofingered Typist}}
			{{center
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			] (]) 15:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Miniapolis@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=944704639 -->
			== GOCE June newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] wrap-up newsletter'''</span>		| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] June 2020 Newsletter'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	<center>
	We have completed our ].
	The ''']''' is now ready for review.		Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since ]. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below. All times and dates stated are in ].
			<div style="text-align: center;">'''Current events'''</div>
			'''Election time:''' Nomination of candidates in our ] opened on 1&nbsp;June, and voting will take place from 00:01 on 16&nbsp;June. ] normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought about helping out at the Guild, or you know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them ].
			''']''': This blitz begins at 00:01 on 14 June and ends at 23:59 on 20 June, with themes of ] and ].
			<div style="text-align: center;">'''Drive and blitz reports'''</div>
			''']''': ] from ] may have played a hand in making this one of our most successful backlog elimination drives. The copy-editing backlog was reduced from 477 to a '''record low of 118 articles''', a 75% reduction. The last four months of 2019 were cleared, reducing the backlog to three months. Fifty requests were also completed, and the total word count of copy-edited articles was 759,945. Of the 29 editors who signed up, 22 completed at least one copy edit. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			''']''': This blitz ran from 12 to 18&nbsp;April with a theme of ]. Of the 18 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed a total of 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			''']''': This event marked the 10th anniversary of the GOCE's copy-editing drives, and set a goal of diminishing the backlog to just one month of articles, as close to zero articles as possible. '''We achieved the goal of eliminating all articles that had been tagged prior to the start of the drive, for the first time in our history!''' Of the 51 editors who signed up, 43 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			<div style="text-align: center;">'''Other news'''</div>
			'''Progress report''': as of 2&nbsp;June, GOCE participants had processed 328 requests since 1&nbsp;January, which puts us on pace to exceed any previous year's number of requests. As of the end of the May drive, the backlog stood at just 156 articles, all tagged in May 2020.
			'''Outreach''': To mark the 10th anniversary of our first Backlog Elimination Drive, ] contributor and GOCE participant {{noping|Puddleglum2.0}} interviewed project coordinators and copy-editors for the journal's ]. The Drive and the current Election of Coordinators have also been covered in ''The Signpost''{{'s}} ].
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Reidgreg}}, {{noping|Tdslk}} and {{noping|Twofingered Typist}}.
	– Your project coordinators: ], ], and ]
	</center>
	{{center		{{center
	| <small>'''{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}''' To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 04:56, 5 June 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
			<small>Sent by ] (]) at 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC).</small>
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0540 -->
			<!-- Message sent by User:Reidgreg@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=960790613 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter ==
	== Creationism considered in Misplaced Pages ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	Hello Jess,
	I remembered your previous patience toward answering my questions and hoped you would have the time to answer another question: I know of books written by scientists who own PH.D's. May books as these work or not?
	Thank you in advance,
	] (]) 04:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] September 2020 Newsletter'''</span>
	== GOCE June/July 2013 events ==
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to the September ], a brief update of Guild activities since ].
			{{Center|{{spaces|17|em}}'''Current and upcoming events'''}}
			]: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!
			'''Election reminder''': ] opens for nominations on 1 December. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them ].
			{{Center|'''Drive and Blitz reports'''}}
			]: An uncorrected typo (even copy editors make copy editing mistakes!) led to an eight-day "leap blitz" from 14 to 21&nbsp;June, focusing on ] and articles tagged in May. 19&nbsp;participating editors claimed 54 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			]: Over 750,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event, keeping pace with the previous three ] drives. Of the 38 people who signed up, 30 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed ].
			]: From 16 to 22&nbsp;August, we copy edited articles tagged in June and July&nbsp;2020 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 37 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			{{Center|'''Other news'''}}
			''']:''' Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Baffle gab1978, Tdslk, Twofingered Typist, and first-time coordinator Puddleglum2.0. {{noping|Reidgreg}} took a break after serving for a couple years. Thanks to everyone who participated!
			'''Progress report:''' As of 01:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 532 requests since 1 January and there were 38 requests awaiting completion on the ]. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above).
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Puddleglum2.0}}, {{noping|Tdslk}} and {{noping|Twofingered Typist}}.
			{{center
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			] (]) 16:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=977643200 -->
			== December 2020 ] Newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] wrap-up newsletter'''</span>		| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] December 2020 Newsletter'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	<center>
	We have completed our ] and are about to commence our ].
	The ''']''' is now ready for review.		Hello and welcome to the December ], a brief update of Guild activities since ].
			{{Center|{{spaces|17|em}}'''Current and upcoming events'''}}
			'''Election time''': our end-of-year ] opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before ]. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them ].
			'''December Blitz''': This will run from 13 to 19 December, and will target all ]. ].
			{{Center|'''Drive and Blitz reports'''}}
			]: 67 fewer articles had copy-edit templates by this month's close. Of the 27 editors who signed up, 15 copy-edited at least one article, and 124 articles were claimed for the drive.
			]: this ran from 18 to 24 October, and focused on articles tagged for copy-edit in July and August 2020, and all Requests. Of the 13 who signed up, 11 editors copy-edited at least one article. 21 articles were claimed for the blitz.
			]: Of the 18 editors who signed up, 15 copy-edited at least one article, and together claimed 134 articles. At the close of the drive, 67 fewer articles were in the backlog and we had dealt with 39 requests.
			{{Center|'''Other news'''}}
			'''Progress report:''' As of 09:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 663 requests (18 from 2019) since 1 January and there were 52 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 494 (see monthly progress graph above).
			'''Annual Report for 2020:''' this roundup of the year's activity at the Guild is planned for publication in late January or early February.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Seasonal tidings and cheers from your GOCE coordinators: {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Puddleglum2.0}}, {{noping|Tdslk}} and {{noping|Twofingered Typist}}.
	– Your project coordinators: ], ], and ]
	</center>
	{{center		{{center
	| <small>'''{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}''' To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 20:22, 24 June 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
			] (]) 03:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0555 -->
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=991943353 -->
			== GOCE June 2021 newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] June 2021 Newsletter'''</span>
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, our first newsletter of 2021, which is a brief update of Guild activities since ]. To unsubscribe, follow the link at the bottom of this box.
			<div style="text-align: center;">'''Current events'''</div>
			'''Election time:''' Voting in our ] opened on 16&nbsp;June and will conclude at the end of the month. ] normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Have your say and show support ].
			''']''': Our June copy-editing blitz is underway and will conclude on 26 June.
			<div style="text-align: center;">'''Drive and blitz reports'''</div>
			''']''': 28 editors completed 324 copy edits totalling 714,902 words. At the end of the drive, the backlog had reached a record low of '''52&nbsp;articles'''. {{small|(])}}
			''']''': 15 editors completed 48 copy edits totalling 142,788 words. {{small|(])}}
	== GOCE July 2013 news report ==
			''']''': 29 editors completed 215 copy edits totalling 407,736 words. {{small|(])}}
	{| style="background-color: #dfeff3; border: 4px solid #bddff2; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;"><big>'''] ] mid-drive newsletter'''</big></span>		''']''': 12 editors completed 23 copy edits totalling 56,574 words. {{small|(])}}
			''']''': 29 editors completed 356 copy edits totalling 479,013 words. {{small|(])}}
	]
			<div style="text-align: center;">'''Other news'''</div>
	*'''Participation''': Out of 30 people who have signed up for this drive so far, 18 have participated. If you have signed up for the drive but have not yet participated, it isn't too late. If you haven't signed up for the drive, sign up now!
	]
			'''Progress report''': as of 26&nbsp;June, GOCE participants had completed {{#expr:40-1<!--last from 220 archive page-->+329-23-4<!--2021 archive page-->+2<!--done but not yet archived-->}} ] since 1&nbsp;January. The backlog has fluctuated but remained in control, with a low of 52 tagged articles at the end of January and a high of 620 articles in mid-June.
	*'''Progress report''': Thus far we have reduced the number of May/June 2012 articles to just 124 articles, so we're on the right track. Unfortunately, for the first time in GOCE history, the number of articles in the backlog has actually gone up during this drive. While all participants are currently doing a fine job, we just don't have as many of them as we have had in the past. We have over 500 editors on our mailing list, but only 18 editors who have done a copy edit for the drive. If you're receiving this newsletter, it's because you have an interest in copy editing. Join the drive! Even if you only copy edit one article, it helps. Imagine how much progress we could make if everyone chipped in just one article.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Dhtwiki}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Tenryuu}} and {{noping|Twofingered Typist}}, and from member {{noping|Reidgreg}}.
	– Your drive coordinators: ], ], ], and ].
	{{center		{{center
	| ''']'''		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	<small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 22:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0579 -->
			<small>Sent by ] (]) on behalf of ] at 12:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC).</small>
	== Acunpuncture isnt 'pseudoscience' ==
			<!-- Message sent by User:Reidgreg@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1029810920 -->
	It cant really be treated as such, since studies have shown it to be effective treatment against nausea and many forms of pain, such as artritis. if you are skeptical concerning this, check the wiki article on it. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			== September 2021 ] newsletter ==
	:I'm familiar with the article. We have sources describing it as such, and our job on wikipedia is only to report what the sources say. I'd be happy to discuss the issue with you. The place to do that is on the article talk page. You can find that by clicking "Talk" at the top left of the article. All the best, &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 21:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	I think it is still a controversial medical practice. There are sources (both eastern and western) saying it is efficient, while others say it is not. Since the opinion of science is still divided. I think we can leave it out f the pseudoscience realm till more defynitive data is published. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] September 2021 Newsletter'''</span>
	== GOCE July 2013 copy edit drive wrap-up ==
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to the September ], a brief update of Guild activities since ].
			{{Center|{{spaces|17|em}}'''Current and upcoming events'''}}
			]: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!
			{{Center|'''Drive and Blitz reports'''}}
			]: From 20 to 26 June, 6&nbsp;participating editors claimed 16 copy edits, focusing on ] and articles tagged in March and April. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			]: Almost 575,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 24 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed ].
			]: From 15 to 21&nbsp;August, we copy edited articles tagged in April and May&nbsp;2021 and requests. 9 participating editors<!--Not including those who signed up but did not do any articles--> completed 17 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			{{Center|'''Other news'''}}
			''']:''' Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis.
			'''New maintenance template''' added to our project scope: After a short ], we added {{tl|cleanup tense}} to the list of maintenance templates that adds articles to the Guild's copy editing backlog categories. This change added 198 articles, spread over 97 months of backlog, to our queue. We processed all of those articles except for those from the three or four most recent months during the July backlog elimination drive (Here's a ]).
			'''Progress report:''' As of 18:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 468 <!--221+179+66+2--> requests since 1 January and there were 60 requests awaiting completion on the ]. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above).
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Dhtwiki}}, {{noping|Tenryuu}}, and {{noping|Miniapolis}}.
			{{center
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			] (]) 16:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1046595296 -->
			== December 2021 GOCE Newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] wrap-up newsletter'''</span>		| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] December 2021 Newsletter'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	<center>
	We have completed our ].
	The ''']''' is now ready for review.		Hello and welcome to the December ], a brief update of Guild activities since ].
			{{Center|{{spaces|17|em}}'''Current and upcoming events'''}}
			'''Election time''': Our end-of-year ] opened for nominations on 1&nbsp;December and will close on 15&nbsp;December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31&nbsp;December at 23:59, just before "]". Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them ].
			]: We have scheduled a week-long copy-editing blitz for 12 to 18&nbsp;December. ] now!
			{{Center|'''Drive and Blitz reports'''}}
			]: Almost 400,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 27 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed ].
			]: From 17 to 23&nbsp;October, we copy edited articles tagged in May and June&nbsp;2021 and requests. 8 participating editors<!--Not including those who signed up but did not do any articles--> completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			]: Over 350,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 21 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed ].
			{{Center|'''Other news'''}}
			It is with great sadness that we report the death on 19&nbsp;November of ], who was active with the Guild almost daily for the past several years. His contributions long exceeded the thresholds for the Guild's highest awards, and he had a hand in innumerable good and featured article promotions as a willing collaborator. Twofingered Typist also served as a Guild coordinator from July 2019 to June 2021. He is ].
			'''Progress report:''' As of 30 November, GOCE copyeditors have completed {{#expr:47-1<!--last from 2020 archive page, less one declined-->+610-24-13<!--2021 requests to 30 November less declined and withdrawn-->}} requests in 2021 and there were 51 requests awaiting completion on the ]. The backlog stood at 946 articles tagged for copy-editing (see monthly ] graph above).
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Jonesey95}}, {{noping|Dhtwiki}}, {{noping|Tenryuu}}, and {{noping|Miniapolis}}.
	– Your project coordinators: ], ], ], and ].
	</center>
	{{center		{{center
	| <small>'''{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}''' To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 23:13, 10 August 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0597 -->
			Distributed via ] (]) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
	Hi Jess, do you mind to take a look of the article ] at your convenience? The issue I have with an edit by an unregistered IP user is summed up in the Talk page I entered today. Thank you. ] (]) 20:31, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Reidgreg@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1058836696 -->
	== GOCE Blitz wrap-up and September 2013 drive invitation ==		== GOCE April 2022 newsletter ==
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"		{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] wrap-up'''</span>		| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] April 2022 Newsletter'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	'''Participation:''' Out of sixteen people who signed up for this blitz, nine copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			Hello and welcome to the April newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since ].
			''']''': {{noping|Jonesey95}} retired as lead coordinator. Reidgreg was approved to fill this role after an 18-month absence from the coordinator team, and Baffle gab1978 was chosen as an assistant coordinator following a one-year break. Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu continued on as long-standing assistant coordinators.
			''']''': Of the 22 editors who signed up, 16 editors claimed 146 copy edits including 45 ]. {{small|(])}}
			''']''': This one-week effort focused on requests and a theme of Africa and African diaspora history. Of the 12 editors who signed up, 6 editors recorded 21 copy edits, including 4 requests. {{small|(])}}
			''']''': Of the 28 editors who signed up, 18 claimed 116 copy edits including 25 requests. {{small|(])}}
			''']''': This one-week copy editing event has been scheduled for 17–23 April, sign up now!
			'''Progress report:''' As of 11 April, copy editors have removed approximately 500 articles from the backlog and completed <!--57+70, counting only those archived-->127 copy-editing requests during 2022. The backlog has been hovering at about 1,100 tagged articles for the past six months.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Reidgreg}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Dhtwiki}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}} and {{noping|Tenryuu}}
	'''Progress report:''' During the seven-day blitz, we removed 26 articles from the ]. Hope to see you at the ] in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Torchiest|Torchiest}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Jonesey95|Jonesey95}}, and {{noping|The Utahraptor|The Utahraptor}}.
	{{center		{{center
	| '''{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}''' <BR><small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 02:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0603 -->
			{{small|Sent via ] (]) 16:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)}}
	== Changes to "Closer to Truth" ==
			<!-- Message sent by User:Reidgreg@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1081774381 -->
			== June GOCE newsletter ==
	Regarding the reversal made to this entry:
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	- No refs in section titles - understandable, will remove
	- No long list of name - understood, will revise
	- Removal of ELs / categories - all external links, save for one (the one to closertotruth.com) point to outdated / defunct content; the categories weren't removed, rather I enhanced them by adding two additional categories
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] June 2022 Newsletter'''</span>
	The page itself was full of self promotion and fluff. Hence, why I started editing it anyways. Changes listed above made and reverted to new version. Thank you for the heads up.
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	] (]) 20:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to the June 2022 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since April 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
	:Hi Endlessct9a. Thanks for taking care of those issues. That article isn't high priority on my watchlist, but I'll try to take another look at some point. Let me know if you need any help. All the best, &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 20:56, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
			'''Blitz:''' of the 16 editors who signed up for our ], 12 completed at least one copy-edit, and between them removed 21 articles from the copy-editing backlog. Barnstars awarded are ].
	== Hanh ? ==
			'''Drive:''' 27 editors signed up for our ]; of these, 20 copy-edited at least one article. 144 articles were copy-edited, and 88 articles from our target months August and September 2021 were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are ].
	Jess, don't know which/what you're speaking of with the mention edit warring left on my talk page. I can only offer that while some edits get replaced over time, others on more active pages got replaced faster, and for any contentious page the WP:BRD simply does not work and any content is not a consensus so much as flavor of the day and a rugby scrum. Misplaced Pages has a list of contentious pages but you can also tell by the history having thousands of changes and the Talk having many posts, some very lengthy and replies going many levels deep to the point it's more a blog than sectioned topic discussions. Misplaced Pages seems to have ironic humor about it, judging from the classical art they posted to illustrate the editor as the Sabine woman between two armies and what the next painting in that series is. Cheers ] (]) 12:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
			'''Blitz:''' our ], starting at 00:01, 19 June and closing at 00:59, 25 June (UTC), will focus on articles tagged for copy edit in September and October 2021, and ]. Barnstars awarded will be posted ].
	:I responded on your talk. Thanks. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 17:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
			'''Progress report:''' As of 07:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 209<!--to 14 June--> requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,404 articles.
			'''Election news:''' Nominations for our half-yearly ] continues until 23:50 on 15 June (UTC), after which, voting will commence until 23:59, 30 June (UTC). All Wikipedians in good standing (active and not blocked, banned, or under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed.
	Jess, let me be a bit more clear -- I have no idea which page you keep pasting to my talk page about, nor do I see a specific to-do in your post -- so there is just no way to make use of it. I'm not retaining things on my talk page so this went. If you have something specific, correct, and useful for me that I could actually go anywhere with, I will be open to at least look at it, and less than that it's likely just not worth your time. Some pages I've been at are deemed contentious by wikipedia and even posted there that the generic guidances are not in effect. I have seen others that seem factually contentious but are not marked as such at this time. My view as I said is that any content for some pages seems not a consensus so much as flavor of the day and a rugby scrum. That would include lots of things like these casual mentions of 'edit warring' or of WP:something by many parties with not much behind it. If you don't like the tone of my feelings or think they are stupid is fine; if you can improve on something I posted would be wonderful; that I do not get to have feelings or am not allowed to view that BRD is not working there is not fine. I do appreciate mention of village pump, and they do have a 3RR discussion ongoing that I'll put a couple cents wager into. Maybe that's all you wanted or can hope for. ] (]) 19:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Reidgreg}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Dhtwiki}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}} and {{noping|Tenryuu}}
	:Mark, you asked for specifics. are edit warring. So are these on a different article: , , . Please don't do that in the future. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 20:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
			{{center
	== Bigfoot edit war ==
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			] (]) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
	Thanks for the note on my page. Does the rule also apply to everybody else who reverted my edits, or just to me?:)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Miniapolis@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1091211559 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter ==
	Regards,
	Petwil <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:11, 3 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	:Obviously the rules apply to everyone equally, including to you. You need to work collaboratively with other editors. Please read ] and stop edit warring. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 01:51, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] October 2022 Newsletter'''</span>
	== GOCE September 2013 drive wrap-up ==
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
			'''Drive:''' Of the 22 editors who signed up for our ], 18 copy-edited, between them, 116 articles. Barnstars awarded are noted ].
			'''Blitz:''' Participants in our ] copy-edited 51,074 words in 17 articles. Of the 15 editors who signed up, 11 claimed at least one copy-edit. Barnstars awarded are noted ].
			'''Drive:''' Forty-one editors took part in our ]; between them they copy-edited 199 articles. Barnstars awards are noted ].
			'''Blitz:''' Our ] begins on 16 October at 00:01 (UTC) and will end on 22 October at 23:59 (UTC). Barnstars awarded will be posted ].
			'''Progress report:''' As of 19:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 303 ]&nbsp;–&#32;including withdrawn and declined ones&nbsp;–&#32;since 1 January. At the time of writing, there are 77 requests awaiting attention and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,759. We always need more active, skilled copyeditors&nbsp;–&#32;particularly for requests&nbsp;–&#32;so please get involved if you can.
			'''Election news:''' In our ], serving coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tenryuu were returned for another term, and were joined by new coordinator Zippybonzo. No lead coordinator was elected for this half-year. {{noping|Jonesey95}}, a long-serving coordinator and lead, was elected as coordinator emeritus; we thank them for their service. Thank you to everyone who took part. Our next election of coordinators takes place throughout ]. If you'd like to help out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself or other suitable editors (with their permission, of course!). It's ''your'' Guild, after all!
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Dhtwiki}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Reidgreg}}, {{noping|Tenryuu}} and {{noping|Zippybonzo}}.
			{{center
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			''']''' 03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Baffle gab1978@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1114867662 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] wrap-up newsletter'''</span>		| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] December 2022 Newsletter'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	<center>The ''']''' is now ready for review.</center>
			Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since October. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
			'''Blitz:''' Our ] focused on July and August 2022 request months; and articles tagged for c/e in December 2021 and January 2022. Seventeen of those who signed up claimed at least one copy-edit, and between them copy-edited forty-six articles. Barnstars awarded are ].
			'''Drive:''' In the ], thirty editors signed up, twenty-two of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Both target months—December 2021 and January 2022—were cleared, and February was added to the target months. Sixteen requests were copy-edited and 239 articles were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are ].
			'''Blitz:''' Our seven-day-long ] begins on 17 December at 00:01 (UTC)*. It will focus on articles tagged for copy-edit in February 2022, and pending requests from September and October. Barnstars awarded will be available ].
			'''Progress report:''' As of 22:40, 8 December 2022, GOCE copyeditors have processed 357 requests since 1 January, there were seventy-four requests outstanding and the backlog stands at 1,791 articles. We always need skilled copy-editors; please help out if you can.
			'''Election news:''' Nomination of candidates for the GOCE's ] for the first half of 2023 is open and continues until 23:59 on 15 December. Voting begins at 00:01 on 16 December and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Coordinators serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on June 30. If you've thought about helping out at the Guild, please nominate yourself or any editor you consider suitable—with their permission, of course!. It's ''your'' Guild and it doesn't coordinate itself.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers and best seasonal wishes from your GOCE coordinators, {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Dhtwiki}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}}, {{noping|Tenryuu}}, and {{noping|Zippybonzo}}.
	<center>{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}
	– Your project coordinators: {{noping|Torchiest|Torchiest}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Jonesey95|Jonesey95}}, and {{noping|The Utahraptor|The Utahraptor}}.
	</center>
	{{center		{{center
	| <small> To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 04:28, 18 October 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>*All times and dates on this newsletter are UTC.<br/> To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
			Sent by ] via ] (]) 00:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0643 -->
			<!-- Message sent by User:Baffle gab1978@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1124873719 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter error ==
	== GOCE Blitz wrap-up; join us for the November drive ==
			The GOCE ], as sent on 9 December, contains an erroneous start date for our ]. The Blitz will start on 11 December rather than on 17 December, as stated in the newsletter. I'm sorry for the mistake and for disrupting your talk page; thanks for your understanding. Sent by ] via ] (]) 21:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"
			<!-- Message sent by User:Baffle gab1978@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1124873719 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report ==
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] wrap-up'''</span>
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] 2022 Annual Report'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
	'''Participation:''' Out of eleven people who signed up for this blitz, eight copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available ].
			<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">Our ''']''' is now ready for review.</div>
	'''Progress report:''' During the seven-day blitz, we copy edited 42 articles from ] backlog, reducing it by a net of 34 articles. Hope to see you at the ] in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Torchiest|Torchiest}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Jonesey95|Jonesey95}}, and {{noping|The Utahraptor|The Utahraptor}}.
			'''Highlights:'''
			*Overview of Backlog-reduction progress
			*Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page
			*Membership news and results of elections
			*Closing words
			<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">– Your Guild coordinators:
			{{noping|Baffle gab1978|Dhtwiki|Miniapolis|Zippybonzo}}</div>
	{{center		{{center
	| '''{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}''' <BR><small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 17:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small> To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0648 -->
			Sent by ] using ] (]) 00:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
	== Books and Bytes: The Misplaced Pages Library Newsletter ==
			<!-- Message sent by User:Baffle gab1978@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1135363252 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter ==
	<div style="border: 2px dashed #ADC2E4; margin: 1px; padding: 1em 2% 1em">
	<center><big><big><big>''''']'''''</big>
	<p>Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
	<p>]
	<p>by {{user|The Interior}}, {{user|Ocaasi}}</center>
	<big>'''Greetings ] members!'''</big> Welcome to the inaugural edition of ''Books and Bytes'', TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of ''Books and Bytes'', please add your name to ]. There's lots of news this month for the Misplaced Pages Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
	<p>'''New positions:''' Sign up to be a Misplaced Pages Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Misplaced Pages Librarian
	<p>'''Misplaced Pages Loves Libraries:''' Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
	<p>'''New subscription donations:''' Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
	<p>'''New ideas:''' OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
	<p>'''News from the library world:''' Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
	<p>'''Announcing WikiProject Open:''' WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
	<p>'''New ways to get involved:''' Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration<br>
	<p><big>]</big><br><br>
	''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be '''opt-in''' only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the ]. --] 20:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''
	</div>
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0651 -->
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	== You seem to be the authority ==
	On the ] page, it doesn't mention anything about what triggered our current cosmological model (the 'big bang') - therefore, ] should be listed among the belief systems - e.g. ].
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] March 2023 Newsletter'''</span>
	Please add this to the counterarguments section (because you've 'shunned' me into not editing the page, further). <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:27, 31 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	Also, there is a growing dissent for ] that this topic isn't helping:
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	Furthermore, the ] discussion is being debated elsewhere - further removing credibility for what was once a very democratic ]. ] (]) 01:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	Your message is being distributed - thug activity like this, soviet-style communism won't be received well.
			Hello and welcome to the March 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since ] and our ]. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members, including those who have signed up for our current March Backlog Elimination Drive. We wish you all happy copy-editing.
	As I said, this erodes Misplaced Pages's credibility. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:56, 31 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	== Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. ==
	]
	This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "]".
	Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] <sup>''] / ]''</sup> 19:39, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
			''']:''' In our December 2022 coordinator election, Reidgreg and Tenryuu stepped down as coordinators; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo were returned as coordinators until 1 July. For the second time, no lead coordinator was chosen. Nominations for our mid-year ] open on 1 June (UTC).
	== Naturopathy ==
			'''Drive:''' 21 editors signed up for our ], 14 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 170 articles totaling 389,737 words. Barnstars awarded are ].
	Hi Mann jess,
	As a naturopathic medical student at Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine in Tempe, AZ I have unique knowledge on the subject matter. Our curriculum is based on science and biomedicine. The claim otherwise is false and misleading about our profession. Please see the definition of Naturopathic Medicine on the AANP's website for a further explanation about or practice.
	http://www.naturopathic.org/content.asp?pl=16&sl=60&contentid=60
	] (]) 20:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)Erik
			'''Blitz:''' Our ] focused on October and November 2022 requests, and the March and April 2022 backlogs. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine claimed at least one copy-edit; and between them, they copy-edited 39,150 words in 22 articles. Barnstars awarded are ].
	:Hi Erik. Thanks for your message. The article talk page (]) is the best place to have a discussion about the article's content. In short, on wikipedia we have to go by sources, and we have a large number which discuss naturopathy as a profession that is very commonly (note: not exclusively) in opposition to the medical and scientific community. We would need additional sources which provided different insight into naturopathy before we would be able to change the article. If you know of such sources (which discuss naturopathy's integration and acceptance within the scientific and medical community), we can certainly discuss them on the article talk page. Thanks! &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 20:18, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
			'''Drive:''' Sign up now for our month-long ]. Barnstars awarded will be posted ] after the drive closes.
	== Iao Valley ==
			'''Progress report:''' As of 12:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 73 requests since 1 January 2023, all but five of them from 2022, and the backlog stands at 1,872 articles.
	Hi. Thanks for uploading your images. I think there must have been confusion over at ] which I have temporarily remedied. The architecture appears to be the entrance to the Korean gardens. Also, I've blanked the "Japanese Heritage Gardens" category from commons because most of these images were erroneously categorized as Japanese when they were not. You are welcome to create a new category appropriately titled "Kepaniwai Heritage Gardens Park" under the Iao Valley category, where all of these images would conceivably reside. The point of this category is inclusive just like the gardens, which celebrates the contributions of ''all'' immigrants to Hawaii, including Native Hawaiians (since they came here by boat), as well as those from New England, China, Japan, the Azores, Korea, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. There are of course, many more, including those from Vietnam. The gardens as a whole are intended to celebrate their contributions as a single tapestry, not segregated into different categories. Thanks. ] (]) 03:50, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
	:FYI...I've proposed moving the files to new names ]. Thanks. ] (]) 03:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Baffle gab1978|Dhtwiki|Miniapolis|Zippybonzo}}.
	::Hi Viriditas. Thanks for the notice! I just used names I found in sources (and our articles). It seems its referred to as the "Japanese Heritage Gardens" pretty often, but I'm not really invested in the topic so I don't have any stake in it. Anyway, thanks for letting me know. I appreciate it! :) &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 19:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
	:::No worries, thanks for uploading your images. The term "Japanese Heritage Gardens" was probably spread by a single person by mistake. The location is known as Kepaniwai Park and Heritage Gardens, but is more commonly referred to in the vernacular as "Kepaniwai Heritage Gardens", particularly by the state and county. The gardens are composed of many different ethnic gardens, with the "Japanese" representing only a very small part. You may want to send a message to the person who used that term to inform them that they are mistaken. Thanks. ] (]) 01:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
			{{center
	==Disambiguation link notification for November 28==
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Baffle gab1978@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1144126811 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors June 2023 Newsletter ==
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:01, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] June 2023 Newsletter'''</span>
	== Cowan reference ==
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	I inform you that the issue you consider addressed are not at all as you consider. An explanatory note will be added in article that specifies that memory of dissolved substances is not the same concept as the memory of persistent correlations of hydrogen bond network.--] (]) 13:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to the June 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since March. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
	:Absolutely do not move forward with adding contentious content about Cowan without consensus. Right now, consensus opposes the changes you proposed. You would need to change consensus in order to implement your ideas. That's what ] is for. I'm sorry that you feel that your proposals weren't sufficiently addressed, but the other editors who have commented all have opposed them, and apparently all feel that the issue doesn't warrant further comment. I don't want to discourage you from proposing new ideas, or from making constructive improvements to the article, but this particular issue has been settled among the editors who are currently participating. If you feel those editors are all wrong, then you need to seek input from other people. ] outlines how to do that explicitly... edit warring is not one of them. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 17:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
			'''Election news:''' Fancy helping out at the Guild? Nominations for our half-yearly ] are open until 23:59 on 15 June (UTC)*. Starting immediately after, the voting phase will run until 23:59 on 30 June. All Wikipedians in ] are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed; it's ''your'' Guild and it doesn't organize itself!
	::I think that this particular issue has not been addressed sufficiently and does not meet the requirements for consensus to emerge and be settled especially with editors who haven't read the full text to be able to reach a founded conclusion. I also consider that editors that have not read the full text of the reference are not allowed to claim establishment of any consensus. Of course other people could be involved in discussion but only those who have read the full text to see some relevance to the topic of the article, '''memory of dissolved substances''' and not some vague impressions got by reading only the abstract.--] (]) 22:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
			'''Blitz:''' Of the 17 editors who signed up for our ], nine editors completed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 24 articles totaling 53,393 words. Barnstars awarded are ].
	:::Yea, I got it. You disagree. That's why I keep telling you to read ]. That's what you do when you don't agree with other editors on the talk page. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 22:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
			'''Drive:''' 51 editors signed up for the month-long ], and 31 copy-edited at least one article. 180 articles were copy-edited. Barnstars awarded are posted ].
	::::Without full text your appeal to ] is (rather, qualifier added--] (]) 15:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)) useless. I'll read again ], although I'm somehow familiar with it. Until each one of us, who have discussed here and on the talk page of the article, has not read the full text, there is no consensus established.--] (]) 22:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
			'''Blitz:''' ] for our week-long June Copy Editing Blitz, which runs from 11 to 17 June. Barnstars awarded will be posted ].
	:::::The paper's abstract is not worthless. Not every editor has to read the full paper (behind a paywall) in order to see that its abstract clearly relates to the subject. Furthermore, that's not how consensus works (see ]; "no consensus" would still mean you shouldn't make your change). The parts of DR that are most relevant to your situation include pointers to ], ], ], ] and ]. Those are your 5 options now. RSN is perhaps the best, since you're disputing the inclusion of a source. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 23:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
	::::::I haven't said that the abstract is worthless. (Please do not twist my words with a strawman). It is just not enough in order to exclude the rather high probability of misleading by misunderstanding the abstract. Full text reading and understanding is a ] to prevent misunderstanding of abstract. Those who want to have a word in deciding consensus should, if necessary, buy access to full text. Otherwise their objections and claim of consensus are baseless. --] (]) 15:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
	::::::Perhaps the situation would be simplified if the full text is available on repositories like arXiv.--] (]) 15:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
			'''Progress report:''' As of 03:09 on 6 June 2023, GOCE copyeditors have processed 91 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,887 articles.
	:::::::If you'd like to make the full text available to editors, go for it. (Of course, please respect the author's copyright and don't post it publicly). Short of that, the paper's summary, written by its authors, which states explicitly that the paper concerns the memory of water, and the paper's appearance in multiple secondary sources which also tie it to water memory and homeopathy, are sufficient to show relevance to the topic. I really don't want to repeat myself again, so go to ] (or try another avenue of ]) if you have further concerns. Thanks. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 15:59, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Dhtwiki}}, {{noping|Miniapolis}} and {{noping|Zippybongo}}.
	::::::::There is no much need to appeal to ]. Please don′t misrepresent the source by stating ″the paper's summary, written by its authors, which states explicitly that the paper concerns the memory of water″ when in fact its subject is the hydrogen bond dynamics network. And stay out of topics for which you have not enough ] to deal with.--] (]) 19:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
			<nowiki>*</nowiki>All times and dates in this newsletter are in ], and may significantly vary from your local time.
	:::::::::Ok then. Well consensus opposes your change, so if you don't want to seek dispute resolution, then there's nothing more to discuss. See you around. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 19:21, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
			{{center
	::::::::::You are in no position to speak of consensus, your statement about it is absolutely baseless. i have to remind you that the consensus is not based on the number of votes (3, you, Brangifer and Jojalozzo) in case you forgot, but on the understanding of the source. In fact there is a consensus between me and Brian to remove the source or at least to introduce a clarifying note based on actual content of the source, not misrepresentations. And you (and apparently your friends Br and Jojal) are against that consensus. See you around.--] (]) 19:38, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			Sent by ] using ] (]) 03:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Baffle gab1978@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1158061878 -->
	== November 2013 GOCE drive wrap-up ==		== Septermber GOCE newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] September 2023 Newsletter'''</span>
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to the September 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
			'''David Thomsen:''' Prolific Wikipedian and Guild member David Thomsen ({{noping|Dthomsen8}}) died in November 2022. He was a regular copy editor who took part in many of our Drives and Blitzes. An obituary was published in the mid-July issue of '']''. Tributes can be left on David's ].
			'''Election news:''' In our ], {{noping|Dhtwiki}} was chosen as lead coordinator, {{noping|Miniapolis|Zippybonzo}} continue as assistant coordinators, and {{noping|Baffle gab1978}} stepped down from the role. If you're interested in helping out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself for our next election in December; it's ''your'' WikiProject and it doesn't organize itself!
			'''June Blitz:''' Of the 17 editors who signed up for our ], 12 copy-edited at least one article. 70,035 words comprising 26 articles were copy-edited. Barnstars awarded are ].
			'''July Drive:''' 34 of the 51 editors who took part in our ] copy-edited at least one article. They edited 276 articles and 683,633 words between them. Barnstars awarded are ].
			'''August Blitz:''' In our ], 13 of the 16 editors who signed up worked on at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 79,608 words comprising 57 articles. Barnstars awarded are available ].
			'''September Drive:''' ] for our month-long '''September Backlog Elimination Drive''', which is now underway. Barnstars awarded will be posted ].
			'''Progress report:''' As of 14:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have processed 245 ] since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,066. <!--UPDATE before sending!-->
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, {{noping|Dhtwiki|Miniapolis|Zippybonzo}}.
			{{center
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			] (]) 13:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
	{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}"
			<!-- Message sent by User:Miniapolis@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1174594958 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter ==
	| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] wrap-up newsletter'''</span>
			<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] December 2023 Newsletter'''</span>
	<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>		<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>		<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
	<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />		<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
	<center>The ''']''' is now ready for review.</center>
			Hello, and welcome to the December 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. Don't forget that you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
			'''Election news:''' The Guild needs coordinators! If you'd like to help out, you may nominate yourself or any suitable editor—with their permission—for the ''']''' for the first half of 2024. Nominations will close at 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). Voting begins immediately after the close of nominations and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under current sanctions) are eligible, and self-nominations are welcome. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on 30 June.
			'''Drive:''' Of the 69 editors who signed up for the ], 40 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 661,214 words in 290 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed ].
			'''Blitz:''' Of the 22 editors who signed up for the ], 13 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 109,327 words in 52 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed ].
			'''Drive:''' During the ], 38 of the 58 editors who signed up copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 458,620 words in 234 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed ].
			'''Blitz:''' Our ] will run from 10 to 16 December. Barnstars awarded will be posted ].
			'''Progress report:''' As of 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 344 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 2,191 articles.
			'''Other news:''' Our Annual Report for 2023 is planned for release in the new year.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Dhtwiki|Miniapolis|Zippybonzo}}.
	<center>{{red|Sign up for the ]!}}
	– Your project coordinators: {{noping|Torchiest|Torchiest}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Jonesey95|Jonesey95}}, and {{noping|The Utahraptor|The Utahraptor}}.
	</center>
	{{center		{{center
	| <small> To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 05:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)</small>		| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
	}}		}}
	|}		|}
			</div>
			Message sent by ] using ] (]) 20:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Baffle gab1978@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1188711019 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors 2023 Annual Report ==
	<!-- Message sent by User:Diannaa@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List -->
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	==Disambiguation link notification for December 5==
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] 2023 Annual Report'''</span>
	Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">Our ''']''' is now ready for review.</div>
	== 10C ==
			'''Highlights:'''
	Jess, if you have a moment, would you please offer your thoughts at ]? —] (]) 14:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
			*Introduction
			*Membership news, obituary and election results
			*Summary of Drives, Blitzes and the Requests page
			*Closing words
			<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">– Your Guild coordinators:
	== The Misplaced Pages Library Survey ==
			{{noping|Dhtwiki|Miniapolis|Wracking}}.</div>
			{{center
			| <small> To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Dhtwiki@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1213970783 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors April 2024 Newsletter ==
	As a subscriber to one of ]'s programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this Thanks and cheers, ]<sup> ]&#124;]</sup> 15:22, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
	<!-- EdwardsBot 0678 -->
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	== Deleting relevant inquiry with regards to the Big Bang Wiki... ==
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] April 2024 Newsletter'''</span>
	Hi Mann Jess,
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	I used the talk page in a very appropriate manner by asking questions that should be addressed within the context of the subject. You wrote to me asserting that my posting was irrelevant and did not 'support' the page. This was clearly not the case (you certainly do not take the time to demonstrate HOW what I've said gave you this justification.)
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to the April 2024 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since ]. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members. We wish you all happy copy-editing.
	The questions related directly to the rationale of how the Wiki lacks specific explanations regarding the subject. You have demonstrated undue prejudice with this regards and I ask you to clarify your reasoning within the context of what I wrote. Here it is again for you to clarify:
			''']:''' In our December 2023 coordinator election, Zippybonzo stepped down as coordinator; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Dhtwiki and Miniapolis were reelected coordinators, and Wracking was newly elected coordinator, to serve through 30 June. Nominations for our mid-year ] will open on 1 June (UTC).
	:Hi. Please read ]. The place to ask questions about the subject of an article is the ], or a forum outside of wikipedia. Article talk pages are for discussing changes to articles. We're building an encyclopedia here, not volunteering as librarians or teachers. I'm sure your questions are important to you. You just asked them at the wrong place. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 05:35, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
			'''Drive:''' 46 editors signed up for our ], 32 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 289 articles totaling 626,729 words. Barnstars awarded are ].
	==Questions==
			'''Blitz:''' 23 editors signed up for our ]. 18 claimed at least one copy-edit and between them, they copy-edited 100,293 words in 32 articles. Barnstars awarded are ].
	'''Note:''' The following questions are mine alone and definitely have no religious nor spiritual motive. Oddly, as a strong atheist and skeptic, I have discovered these questions met with an unusual amount of unnecessary ridicule and condescension just as taboo with regards to strong believers who perpetually demand me to require another further investment in deeper resources and authorities. I have yet to discover anyone or any source that has demonstrated a sufficient logical connection in these questions.] (]) 05:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
	'''1.''' What justifies the explanation that the background microwave radiation is
	'''(a)''' ...the absolute distinguishing characteristic of a Big Bang cosmology ?] (]) 05:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
			'''Drive:''' 53 editors signed up for our ], 34 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 300 articles totaling 587,828 words. Barnstars awarded are ].
	'''(b)''' ...absolutely opposed to or contradicts the Steady State or similar possible version(s) presuming a postulate of the Perfect Cosmological Principle?] (]) 05:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
			'''Blitz:''' Sign up for our ], which runs from 14 to 20 April. Barnstars will be awarded ].
	'''2.''' To establish credibility, is it possible that this theory is in error? (I question this since it seems all too often this subject is closed with respect to any, let alone reasonable, inquiry in most forums, including this one as presented in the above 'warning' to not debate this here. I find that redirection to discuss these elsewhere is a means to trash, ignore, or hide dissenting views and to only encourage those with formally accredited views from the established educational institutions.)] (]) 05:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
			'''Progress report:''' As of 23:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)<!-- ~~~~~ Upadate before sending-->, GOCE copyeditors have processed 109 requests since 1 January 2024, and the backlog stands at 2,480 articles.
	As a '''corollary''' to this, how is validation of one's predictions ''alone'' of this theory considered as sufficient support within the framework of this subject while the same rationalization is obviously fallacious with regards to similar kinds of religious predictions? That is, how is the sole evidence of an instance or class result due to a prediction sufficient support for it and a perfect contradiction for all variations of those predictions that may explain the same result(s)?] (]) 05:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from {{noping|Baffle gab1978}} and your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Dhtwiki|Miniapolis|Wracking}}.
	'''3.''' If it assumed that there has been no other alternate suggestions that improve on this, I ask why, for instance, has the background radiation not been offered more simpler justification such as follows: the radiation can represent higher energy wavelengths from more regular galaxies that have been stretched to the microwave range due to even further distances than what is presumed. ? (The radiation can be of such high frequency that nothing we have is capable of measuring it in close range like those of the closer galaxies.)I am demonstrating here that at least, an alternative potential theory can exist easily that would predict the same phenomena.] (]) 05:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
			{{center
	'''4.''' Does it seem reasonable to question the potential and likely economic, political and authoritative (professional reputations of individuals or institutions) risks involved should the Big Bang Theory be demonstrated to be certainly false? That is, are we so invested in this idea culturally that it isn't ''possible'' to ever dislodge it without extensive losses? The momentum of such a theory or similar ones and the investments of those based on them prevent a redress to consider reconstructing them on a better foundational theory.] (]) 05:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Dhtwiki@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1216948390 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors June 2024 Newsletter ==
	== Water memory ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
	Please don't make any more reverts there, even if you think you are right. Thinking you are right is no defence against ]. Please use other means to resolve your differences there in the future. --] (]) 22:11, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] June 2024 Newsletter'''</span>
	:Thanks, but I haven't really been reverting. We've been discussing the issue now on the talk page since this morning. I made two reverts today, both of content that had been discussed thoroughly on the talk page before, and I opened another section on the talk page (as well as a comment on ANI) to encourage ''additional'' discussion. While I appreciate the advice, prohibitions on edit warring are to facilitate discussion, which I've personally made every effort to do, and it's been working. I wouldn't exactly characterize the current climate of water memory as edit warring. BTW, I responded to you on ANI. I'd really appreciate if you retracted your comment claiming that I called Brian racist. Thank you. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 22:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
	::Reverting is reverting, and reverting while discussing is still reverting. I am asking you not to do that. I can't retract a comment I did not make; you made a slightly weird comment about racism and Nobel laureates which I asked you to clarify, and you did. I still very strongly think you shouldn't have brought racism into it. It isn't anything to do with the dispute you are having, so why bring it up? --] (]) 06:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to the June 2024 newsletter, a quarterly-ish digest of Guild activities since April. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
	:::John, I don't know how to explain this better. This whole exchange has been positively unpleasant. You misunderstood me. No one else seems to have. Editors were claiming that we should just let Nobel laureates make significant changes that contravene our policies. I used a few examples to show what that would lead to. It would mean our telepathy article says it's a real thing in the case of Brian, and '''if expanded''' to '''other''' Nobel laureates it would mean the addition of even less desirable content. You then suggested I should be topic banned, implying I called Brian racist. I apologized if I wasn't clear and explained what I had intended, to which you continued to reply aggressively and blamed the misunderstanding on me. Then you accused me of edit warring.
	:::We all have different approaches to wikipedia. I sincerely appreciate you sharing yours with me. However, my comment on ANI seems to have communicated the idea I intended to other editors, and my behavior on water memory seems to have facilitated discussion in the way I had hoped. I would appreciate it if you took a collaborative tone when discussing further issues with me. If you're unable to do that, I'd appreciate it if we could simply part ways; I don't need additional aggression in my life. It's one thing when it comes from a content dispute while building the encyclopedia, but this is meta drama on ANI. It's unnecessary, and I'd appreciate if it didn't continue. Thanks. &nbsp; &mdash; ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">&middot; ]]</span> 15:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
			'''Election news:''' Wanted: new Guild coordinators! If you value and enjoy the GOCE, why not help out behind the scenes? Nominations for our ] are now open until 23:59 on 15 June (UTC). Self-nominations are welcome. Voting commences at 00:01 on 16 June and continues until 23:50 on 30 June. Results will be announced at the election page.
			'''Blitz:''' Nine of the fourteen editors who signed up for the ] copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 55,853 words comprising twenty articles. Barnstars awarded are available ].
			'''Drive:''' 58 editors signed up for our ] and 33 of those completed at least one copy edit. 251 articles and 475,952 words were copy edited. Barnstars awarded are ].
			'''Blitz:''' Our ] will begin on 16 June and finish on 22 June. Barnstars awarded will be posted ].
			'''Progress report:''' As of 05:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC) <!-- ~~~~~ -->, GOCE copyeditors have completed 161 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 2,779 articles.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from {{noping|Baffle gab1978}} and your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Dhtwiki|Miniapolis|Wracking}}.
			{{center
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			<!-- Message sent by User:Dhtwiki@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1227168027 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter ==
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; text-color: #000000; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			| <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] September Newsletter'''</span>
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
			'''Election news:''' Project coordinators play an important role in our WikiProject. Following the ], we welcomed {{noping|Mox Eden}} to the coordinator team. {{noping|Dhtwiki}} remains as Lead Coordinator, and {{noping|Miniapolis|Wracking}} returned as assistant coordinators. If you'd like to help out behind the scenes, please consider taking part in our December election&nbsp;–&#32;watchlist our ] for updates. Information about the role of coordinators can be found ].
			'''Blitz:''' 13 of the 24 editors who signed up for the ] copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 169,404 words comprising 41 articles. Barnstars awarded are ].
			'''Drive:''' 38 of the 59 editors who signed up for the ] copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 482,133 words comprising 293 articles. Barnstars awarded are ].
			'''Blitz:''' 10 of the 15 editors who signed up for the ] copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 71,294 words comprising 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are ].
			'''Drive:''' ] to earn barnstars in our month-long, in-progress September Backlog Elimination Drive.
			'''Progress report:''' As of 05:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 233 ] since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,824 articles.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we do without you! Cheers from {{noping|Baffle gab1978}} and your GOCE coordinators {{noping|Dhtwiki|Miniapolis|Mox Eden|Wracking}}.
			{{center
			| <small>To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			Message sent by ] (]) using ] (]) 05:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Baffle gab1978@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1244398910 -->
			== Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter ==
			<div lang="en" dir="ltr">
			{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; color: #000000"; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
			|<span style="font-size: 110%; color: #000000";>'''] December 2024 Newsletter'''</span>
			<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
			<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div>
			<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
			]
			Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you no longer want this newsletter, you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our ] to your watchlist.
			'''Election news:''' The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure <s>nearly</s> everything runs smoothly and on time. Editors in good standing (unblocked and without sanctions) are invited to ] (with their permission, of course) until 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). The voting phase begins at 00:01 on 16 December and runs until 23:59 on 31 December. Questions may be asked of candidates at any stage in the process. Elected coordinators will serve a six-month term from 1 January through 30 June.
			'''Drive:''' In our ], 67 editors signed up, 39 completed at least one copy edit, and between them they edited 682,696 words comprising 507 articles. Barnstars awarded are ].
			'''Blitz:''' The ] saw 16 editors sign-up, 15 of whom completed at least one copy edit. They edited 76,776 words comprising 35 articles. Barnstars awarded are ].
			'''Drive:''' In our ], 432,320 words in 151 articles were copy edited. Of the 54 users who signed up, 33 copy edited at least one article. Barnstars awarded are posted ].
			'''Blitz:''' The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 15 December (UTC) and will end on 21 December at 23:59. ]. Barnstars awarded will be posted ].
			'''Progress report:''' As of 22:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 333 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,401 articles.
			Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, {{noping|Dhtwiki|Miniapolis|Mox Eden|Wracking}}.
			{{center
			| <small>To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ].</small>
			}}
			|}
			</div>
			Message sent by ] using ] (]) 22:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC).
			<!-- Message sent by User:Baffle gab1978@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List&oldid=1261391607 -->

---

Latest revision as of 22:49, 7 December 2024

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7

Global warming skepticism and climate change denial

Hello. A heads up in case you have innocently run into this particular WP buzz-saw: many of our colleagues have very strong opinions about the appropriate use of such terms and do not consider them interchangeable. Anthony Watts seems to be something of a ground zero for this dynamic. Hugh (talk) 23:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the notice! I appreciate it! While I haven't edited his article previously, I'm not new to the topic, so I do know what you mean. If it comes up again based on my edits, I have no problem discussing it, but using the most common terminology from the academic literature should be fine. Thanks again - hopefully I'll see you around in the future.   — Jess· Δ♥ 03:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

The problem is that the academic literature uses the terms interchangeably, sometimes within the same article. There are people who don't like that. In the interest of harmony perhaps the best solution is to put "skeptic" in scare quotes, thusly. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 03:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Using the word "skeptic" throws up red flags for me right off the bat, because it is the word used in a PR campaign by "climate change skeptics". Given that, yes, I suppose there would be usage of "skeptic" out there on the net, since it's the label they've promoted. More significant to me is what impartial academic sources use to describe the topic, and my understanding has been that "climate change denial" is more common among those sources. I could be wrong, and I'll spend some time researching this in the next few days. Perhaps that will change my perspective. To be honest, I'm not really looking forward to wading into a new perennial discussion, but here we go... Thanks for the feedback!   — Jess· Δ♥ 05:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

feel ya! Thanks for the refs. I have used most of them to improve the article. Any way you could share the Critical Policy Studies by Dieter Plehwe? It looks interesting. Thanks again. Hugh (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Oh my, I never got back to you @HughD:! So sorry about that! I don't have the source on hand, but I'll see if I can get you a copy as soon as I get the chance. I'm doing some research on a related topic right now, and then I'll be heading to bed. Sorry for leaving you hanging a few days ago! If I seem to forget again, poke me :) Thanks for dropping me a note!   — Jess· Δ♥ 03:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit summary

It's been discussed ad nauseam on the talk page. This is clearly a WP:FRINGE POV. The vast overwhelming number of sources don't use this term. Per WP:WTW, we are not supposed to use this term unless widely used by reliable sources. And I hate to remind you that the burden of proof is on those wishing to restore contentious BLP content, not the other way around. Let's just follow the rules, OK? A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

1) The sources that matter are the most reliable, and most reflective of the academic consensus. That means a book by Mann is more significant than an article on the Guardian.

2) We have a large list of reliable sources which back up the wording proposal. I haven't seen any that contend Mann has not characterized the blog in this way. I also haven't seen any that contend it isn't what he characterizes it to be.

3) It is not a fringe POV that Watts Up With That? is a blog dedicated to climate change denial. Your usage of "climate change skepticism" means the same thing with different words. Your concern (as you've expressed it) is not that the content is fringe, but that the language we've used is inappropriate. That doesn't qualify as fringe.

4) Yes, this has been discussed to death, and if any consensus has resulted, it has been that the content is reliable and appropriate.

5) Your version of the article fails to reflect the mainstream scientific opinion regarding Watts' views, which is, itself, a WP:FRINGE and WP:WEIGHT violation.

6) "Climate change denial" is not a word to watch. "Denier" is. Climate change denial is the common name used to describe a subject this blog is known to espouse. We are not saying "Anthony Watts is a denier". We are saying "Mann has characterised his blog as the most prominent website about climate change denial on the internet", an opinion which is widely held.

@A Quest For Knowledge: We've worked together positively in the past. I don't know what's led up to this disagreement, but I'm looking at it with a fresh perspective, and your approach is pushing it towards being intractable. Editors who would agree with you on this issue also by and large would support keeping out any mention of the scientific consensus about climate change, and representing Watts' opinion unchallenged. You are siding with those who would advocate for climate change denial, a fringe and pseudoscientific view, and that's a side I'm not familiar with you being on. If things continue in this direction, it looks like we'll be needing more formal means of dispute resolution. Right now, the article is a massive fringe and weight violation, and it can't stay that way.   — Jess· Δ♥ 05:24, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I believe that you have misread the situation. The key issue here is what do reliable sources say about this topic? Or to put it another way, what do the majority of reliable sources say about this topic? Nobody is disputing that Mann is reliable source (or at least I'm not). But we don't look as sources in isolation. We look at the totality of sources. And even when using Google Scholar, the vast, overwhelming majority of scholarly sources don't use the term "denier". There is no "large list of reliable sources which back up the wording proposal". There's just a small handful.

What I am saying is that the term, "denier" is a fringe term because the majority of sources don't use this term. We should follow the majority.

Guilt by association is a logical fallacy. I have no interest in disputing the scientific consensus about global warming. What I am taking an issue with is the use of the word "denier", that's all. Will you work with me to figure out a way to add a link to the Climate change denial without using the term "denial"? I believe that Dave had a reasonable solution. Can we pursue that further? A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 05:52, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

We're not discussing the word "denier". We're discussing the subject "climate change denial". Words aren't used in isolation, either. I'm fine with Dave's suggestion. I'm not fine with removing reliably sourced content, placing the article back in a state where it contravenes our policies. If you want to add Dave's suggestion, I'd be fine with that, but right now you're removing the single and only mention of the scientific consensus in the entire article.   — Jess· Δ♥ 06:07, 23 May 2015 (UTC)0

There is already two WikiLinks to the Scientific opinion on climate change in the article. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 06:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

The only links we have are there because I added them today. Previous attempts to add them have all been reverted, including just today.   — Jess· Δ♥ 06:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

And despite the links I just added, there is still no prose indicating the scientific consensus. We were adding some, but it was reverted. The first link to scientific opinion on climate change is hidden in an uncontested fringe claim by Watts, in clear violation of WP:FRINGE   — Jess· Δ♥ 06:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions re climate change

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Climate change, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Apologies if this has already been received. I searched but failed to find it on talk history, system log, etc. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 16:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I'm aware. Thanks. In fact, we should place this as a note in the edit window of the page.   — Jess· Δ♥ 16:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Thank you for your excellent work on pages related to climate change denial. I had nearly given up hope before you arrived. jps (talk) 14:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! I appreciate the kind words! :) It looks like we're all having a positive impact on the topic. Thanks for the help! I've really appreciated your input on the talk page, in particular! That's really that hard part!   — Jess· Δ♥ 14:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Long game, I think, will be our best bet. Seeing all the sleeper socks come out of the woodwork is really interesting. jps (talk) 02:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Yep. These things die down over time. I requested full protection for a few days, which would help to encourage filling up the talk page instead of the article and prevent rampant violations of our policies in the meantime. It shouldn't be a big problem long-term. I'm just hoping we can avoid having to go to ani or ae, if we can.   — Jess· Δ♥ 04:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Good work! One small point, did you mean to restore the NPOV tag? You might wish to undo that part of your edit. . . . . dave souza, talk 23:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Whoops! Sorry about that. I really have no idea how that snuck in there. All fixed now. Thanks for letting me know!   — Jess· Δ♥ 00:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

My edit

It is generally poor form to edit anyone else's comment. I didn't change yours, but I did move it to a separate section, to avoid a thread argument within a section. If you think it is better to have a thread discussion within the section let's discuss.--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

I don't know why we need 4 subsections in order to list sources, nor why two separate comment sections would ever be required. But whatever you want to do...   — Jess· Δ♥ 18:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Mann lawsuit

If you look at the date of the Facebook posting, you will see that in fact the lawsuit seems to be inactive. We've discussed before that Mann's activist FB postings as a public figure are RSs for his own opinions and activities. YoPienso (talk) 17:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

I don't doubt that the lawsuit is inactive; indeed, I think it is. I believe you when you say the suit is inactive. But a facebook post isn't a reliable source generally, and there's especially a problem when the idea of citing a post which says the suit is active for the claim it is inactive, based only on the date of the post. If it has been inactive for several years, we could surely find a proper RS to back it up. It's probably best to err on the side of avoiding misinformation rather than providing poorly sourced information, IMO. Thanks for dropping me the note about it!   — Jess· Δ♥ 17:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Maybe in a spirit of collegiality you could let Tillman know your edit summary was too strong. That "source" says the exact opposite clearly implies the source says the suit is active, which you admit here is not so. I agree the fact is not currently essential to the BLP. Best wishes, YoPienso (talk) 20:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Hmm. I think I may not have been clear enough. I meant to say: "I don't doubt the lawsuit is probably inactive, but I haven't seen a source indicating it is. The facebook post says the lawsuit is still active, so it doesn't back up the claim that it's inactive." Have I misread the facebook post? I'll take a look at it again if you got the opposite impression from it than I did; perhaps it's just my reading comprehension.   — Jess· Δ♥ 20:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

• I hadn't noticed this, but in fact my edit was pretty weak (absence of evidence /= EofA), so I wasnt sorry to be called on it.

Yopienso, thanks for the kind words. Someday we'll get the "Climate Warrior" stuff to stick! But, for a start, I'll try again on Mann's "State Penn" lawsuit..... RSN! Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 02:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Surface stations

Thanks for the work you're doing on this, I suggest adding the following ref but don't know if you want it in a harv format. regards, dave souza, talk 18:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
ref name="Menne Williams Palecki 2010">Menne, Matthew J.; Williams, Claude N.; Palecki, Michael A. (2010). "On the reliability of the U.S. surface temperature record". J. Geophys. Res. 115 (D11). Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1029/2009jd013094. Retrieved 27 May 2015. </ref date: 8 June 2010

Hi Dave. Thanks for the source! I added it to the article to back up the current content. Are you aware if this was an additional study beyond the ones we're already citing (i.e. NOAA)? If so, we may be able to add something about NOA's findings being supported by other research. I wasn't 100% sure on that, so I left out any new prose for right now, but let me know if you have thoughts on the matter. Thanks!   — Jess· Δ♥ 18:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Mann p. 72 "scientists of ", refs 62, notes p. 284 refers to this paper. . . dave souza, talk 19:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Also, from the leading historian on the topic:

• Weart, Spencer R. (February 2015). "The Modern Temperature Trend". The Discovery of Global Warming. American Institute of Physics. Retrieved 31 May 2015. Regardless of what had happened in past centuries, the warming since the 19th century was now as certain a fact as anything in science. A few critics continued to seek confirmation of their denial of the warming in data on air temperatures from weather stations and satellites. In particular, former TV weatherman Anthony Watts established a popular website……

Worth reading on, he also cites Menne (2010). . . . dave souza, talk 19:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, that one is good as well. I tried to fit it into our existing coverage, which it seems to compliment nicely; Mann, etc, didn't go into detail about why the bias wouldn't impact results even if present, but Weart did. Thanks for tracking it down, it was an interesting read!   — Jess· Δ♥ 20:32, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I see you've not quoted the point about denial of the warming in data, which ties in with Mann's assessment of the purpose of the project, and Powell p. 136 "deniers say that the U.S. historical temperature record is unreliable" etc.. In my view the section should start with that context.
I've added a quote to the WUWT talk page from Watts, Anthony (2009). Is the U.S. surface temperature record reliable? : how do we know global warming is a problem if we can't trust the U.S. temperature record? (PDF). Chicago, IL: The Heartland Institute. pp. front and back covers, p. 2. ISBN 978-1-934791-29-5. which rather differs from his more recent announcement about his views...has he recanted? . . dave souza, talk 22:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

p.s. I'm not sure I fully follow Weart's wording about the effect of the bias, so worth checking it against Menne (2010) . . dave souza, talk 22:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I did quote the part about denial initially, but removed it just before saving. I know my quotes from sources have been getting longer and longer, and I figured that part was already covered by other sources anyway. I'm certainly not averse to playing musical chairs with the sources; if we need to swap or replace any of them, let's do that! I want to expand our coverage using them once I've finished cleaning them all up. Regarding Watts' stance, if he's changed his opinion, we should cover it. I'll look over that source and see what I find. Thanks, Dave!   — Jess· Δ♥ 00:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

On the first point, in my opinion Weart is respected and independent, and though brief, is a very high quality source for Watts' "denial of the warming in data". Slightly indirect, and as the cite from Watts himself shows the denial is aimed at undermining the credibility of warming data, not outright saying there's no warming, but that's a position covered in Climate change denial#Arguments and positions on global warming. Fair point about using the other sources first. . . dave souza, talk 06:23, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

p.s. the Menne paper was first published 8 June 2010. Surface Temperature Records: Policy Driven Deception? by Joe D’Aleo and Anthony Watts, UPDATED, AUGUST 27, 2010, "The startling conclusion that we cannot tell whether there was any significant 'global warming' at all in the 20th century is based on numerous astonishing examples of manipulation and exaggeration of the true level and rate of 'global warming." . .dave souza, talk 07:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Hope you don't mind, but I found WaPo sources on the BEST issue, covering the TOBS factor, and got puzzled about the timing: Watts' own blog cleared that up. So, I've edited it with additional sources, and split the BEST issue into a subsection. I'm not wedded to having that subsection, and wouldn't mind it being incorporated back into the parent Surface Stations section. One minor amusement, the citation formatting tool dates the WUWT Publications and Projects page 4 Aug 2012, but the only date shown is the current month above the calender at the bottom of the page. Perhaps a bit slow to update his page! . . dave souza, talk 21:09, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Nice job, Dave! I hope you haven't been discouraged by my reduced participation the last few days; I've been trying to hold myself back from making any content additions until all the drama dies down; resolution at AE will be helpful. It's been a hard goal, since I've now read a chunk of every one of our sources (and then some), and I was looking forward to better incorporating them. It looks like you've done a good job with that section! Thanks for keeping me involved! :)   — Jess· Δ♥ 05:58, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Directed at whom?

Jess, this edit is addressed to someone named Peter. I think it is a mistake, but checking here to see if you were actually responding to me.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

My apologies. That reply was intended for you. I was thinking your name was Peter for some reason; it was pretty late at the time, so I'll just blame it on me being tired. ;) Thanks for correcting me.   — Jess· Δ♥ 13:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Apropos of nothing, my (late) brother's name is Peter. No problems, but I once responded (heatedly) to a message I thought was directed at me, then learned I was wrong, so I try to make sure I don't misread.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

NEED your help, please!

Hi Jess,

Thanks for your kind message. I would appreciate you help, please. I am an editor and am working to update and re-arrange poorly displayed or poorly organized information on some articles. I have started with the Ben Carson page, NOT the Ben Carson presidential campaign, 2016 page. The first section I tried to update is in his Medical Career section, the Medal and awards sub-section. It does not mention his 2008 Lincoln Medal from Ford's Theatre. I tried to add that, with two citations, understanding that this page is semi-protected. Also, I tried to re-arrange the existing information there already since it is not reader-friendly. All I wanted to do is display the info with bullet points. I THINK I created the revisions correctly and clicked Save as needed, but I'm not sure I did it correctly since it has been over 24 hours since I tried the update as Ljhammond14 but no updates are evident yet. Do you know how to look to see if my request to edit is in a 'waiting room' or some preliminary area? Perhaps I didn't Save correctly or at the right time. I'm a little confused and if you can help me I would be very grateful!!! I suppose I need to come back here to read your reply......or perhaps it will show up on my Talk page for Ljhammond14. THANKS for any way you can help me!!! Ljhammond14 (talk) 11:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

@Ljhammond14: Hi! Thanks for dropping me a line! It looks like you were editing Talk:Ben_Carson, and you've managed to figure out how to make an edit request. That's awesome! It takes a little getting used to how some of this all works, and that can be one of the more confusing processes. I'm not familiar with that page at all (nor am I really familiar with Ben Carson), so I can't be much help in deciding how to present information on that page. But, your requests seem pretty reasonable to me, so I'm sure other editors will pop in and help out with them. I did complete the first one for you (the addition of the lincoln medal), since that addition seemed pretty straightforward. I'll leave the other two for regular editors on that page, since they might have more input on the subject area. Your best bet is just to discuss the issues with other editors on that page and see if you can collaborate to make improvements. Thanks for your suggestions! If you have any other trouble, feel free to drop me another line.   — Jess· Δ♥ 04:47, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Jess,

Somehow it is reassuring to be communicating with a fellow human out here in the big, bad land of Misplaced Pages (it's not really big and bad!) Thanks for your approval of the award Lincoln Medal edit. Will that just show up by magic and be live or will some other process come about? Yes, it was a bit daunting to figure out the Request for an Edit process but I tried to be patient and read and read and read.  :-) There are some issues with the Carson page but I've already posted a fix for the birth order of their 3 sons. Ben Jr. was born second, not first. Do you have any words of wisdom for me? There are a few more corrections I need to make but if you say just take it easy, slowly, a little at a time, that works or me. I can be patient if I need to be. (really, more patient with myself than anything.) Thanks again for your encouragement and I'll listen to all the advice you care to share. Happy weekend! Lois Ljhammond14 (talk) 07:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

GOCE June 2015 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2015 News May drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 38 people who signed up, 29 copyedited at least one article, and we got within 50 articles of our all-time low in the backlog. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Coordinator elections: Nominations are open through June 15 for GOCE coordinators, with voting from June 16–30. Self-nominations are welcome and encouraged. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Biblioworm and Philg88. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Assyria. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
That section as it reads is purely POV, and violates our neutral point of view policy. RoadWarrior445 (talk) 18:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Suggest revising your complaint at AE

FYI, if I read it correctly, your AE complaint refers to "the article" (or its talk page) without telling the overburdened busy arbs when you jump from referencing the WUWT article/talk page, to the Anthony Watts (blogger) one. It might help the rest of the committee if you inserted some explanatory remarks. In your place I might leave the original text, but use small font to insert <small>clarification, here I am refering to the article "_________"</small>, but of course there's a million ways to go about it, assuming it needs doing at all. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the suggestion. I'm not sure whether it's necessary to distinguish between the two, since the content being discussed on both articles is identical. I was trying to focus on the behavior (also identical) across the topic without getting bogged down with details. I think I'll leave it as-is for now, which might be the wrong call, but I think the arbs have probably reviewed the case by now anyway, so we'll see what happens. I appreciate the feedback, though! Thanks.   — Jess· Δ♥ 14:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Copy and pasting

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. We at Misplaced Pages usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please send permission for release under a CC BY SA license to permissions-en@wikimedia.org per WP:CONSENT. great job with attribution, please do a bit more paraphrasing and avoid large block quotes. Friendly reminder. I am not concerned about your edits. Keep up the good work.--Lucas559 (talk) 15:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Lucas. Thanks for the note! is there an edit in particular that caught your attention? I'm on a mobile device until tomorrow, so its tough to check my recent contribs to see which one probably caught your eye, and I can't recall any, besides the direct quotes inside ref tags at anthony watts. I appreciate the input! Thanks.   — Jess· Δ♥ 06:49, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, back on a normal computer again. @Lucas559:, it looks like your bot caught this edit, which is adding a source with a direct quote. The quote is a bit lengthy, but I believe within the purview of fair use, since we are discussing its contents explicitly within the article body, and the quote cannot be reasonably shortened without losing some of that content. I'd recommend, if possible, the bot tried to avoid flagging content within the quote parameter of our citation templates, since that will always be copied from the source and should not be paraphrased. If you review the edit again and feel it is in any way not in compliance with our policies on copyright, please let me know, and I'll ask our copyright experts if and where I've gone wrong! Thanks!   — Jess· Δ♥ 17:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Ah, you're not the bot's owner. I submitted a report. Anyway, thanks again.   — Jess· Δ♥ 17:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Copyright Violation Detection - EranBot Project

A new copy-paste detection bot is now in general use on English Misplaced Pages. Come check it out at the EranBot reporting page. This bot utilizes the Turnitin software (ithenticate), unlike User:CorenSearchBot that relies on a web search API from Yahoo. It checks individual edits rather than just new articles. Please take 15 seconds to visit the EranBot reporting page and check a few of the flagged concerns. Comments welcome regarding potential improvements.

Edit Warring???

Making one (One!) edit is not and can never be considered edit warring. I note that you have engaged in actual edit warring that page WP:3RR. Personal attacks and accusations of other ediotors is entirely inappropriate. Perhaps you should look for a seasoned editor that could mentor you and help you avoid your drift into incivility and further blocks. I frankly expect an apology. Capitalismojo (talk) 17:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring and 3rr are different things. Another user has been making this change to several pages for a month, but has not engaged in discussion or made an effort to establish consensus for his edit. See the various talk pages for examples, and note the lack of substantive reply between reversions. Your edit jumped into the middle of that dispute to revert, but you made no effort to go to the talk page to discuss it either. Even your edit summary - "Better before" - added nothing to the discussion. Yes, that's edit warring; it is imposing your preferred version via reverting instead of discussion and consensus building. It's really no big deal in this case, I simply asked you to participate in the discussion instead of edit warring. If you're interested in being involved in the discussion, please join it, but if your interest is imposing your preferences via reverting without discussion, please don't do that.   — Jess· Δ♥ 17:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

I take it by this that you are not actually apologizing for calling my one reversion "Edit warring" nor do you think that your actual improper edit warring is in any sense wrong...OK. I have seen this sort of behavior before, it doesn't usually end well. Capitalismojo (talk) 22:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

AWB, I suggested it might be time for you to take a break from your CC "campaign". Please consider this. As CM noted, it usually doesn't end well. Just a thought, from someone who has seen a lot of this stuff over the years. Best regards, Pete Tillman (talk) 23:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

@CM, no, I'm not going to apologize for asking you not to edit war. Please don't edit war. Yes, jumping into a dispute only to revert without making any effort to participate in the discussion or give a proper rationale for your revert is edit warring. I'm sorry this is apparently offensive to you.   — Jess· Δ♥ 03:19, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

You did not "ask me not to edit war", you accused me of edit warring. I have not engaged in it and my one edit was not and is not "edit warring" under anyone's definition. Your behavior continues to be uncollegial and uncivil. Your battleground activity is inappropriate, so yes I find it offensive. Capitalismojo (talk) 20:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry you feel that way. This happened over a month ago, so I had to look into the history to remember the details. Tillman made a change on the 23rd and said "See talk". I responded to him and reverted, pointing to 2 active discussions on the topic. About a day later, you reverted me, reinstituting Tillman's change. Your edit summary was "better before", which does nothing except express a personal preference, and you made no attempt to participate in either discussion. I would have hoped you would have participated in the discussion instead of reverting, or at the very least made an effort to respond to other editors while reverting. When an editor ignores discussion and attempts to institute their preference into the article via reverting alone, I call that "edit warring". I don't think I'm alone in that respect, but you are welcome to call it whatever you'd like. I didn't template you, or warn you in any way, I simply asked you to participate in the discussion instead of reverting. I believe that was an appropriate request.   — Jess· Δ♥ 21:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Further reading at CCD

Thanks for cleaning this up. Big improvement! Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 19:35, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikiproject Environment, Climate Change Task Force invitation

Thank you for your contributions to Environment/Environmentalism related articles, and/or improvements to the coverage of environmental topics throughout Misplaced Pages. Perhaps you'd be interested in joining WikiProject Environment? WikiProject Environment is a WikiProject dedicated to improving Misplaced Pages's coverage of topics related to the natural environment and biophysical environment. If you would like to participate or join, please add your name to the members list here, or visit the project page for more information. Thanks! ~~~~ Click here to visit the project page

Thank you very much for your recent contributions! Please consider joining our climate change task force and watching the talk page. Thanks again. Hugh (talk) 16:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Library needs you!

We hope The Misplaced Pages Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Misplaced Pages Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikinic Buffalo

Wiknik Buffalo is being planned for July 26, 2015. You can find more information here: Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Buffalo. BuffaloBob (talk) 13:24, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

The date has been changed to August 2nd. BuffaloBob (talk) 22:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Your AE filing

Can you split the filing into two separate sections? Just for the sake of clarity and stuff. Would be much appreciated. - Penwhale | 03:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Sure. I wasn't sure which would be the easiest. I'll make an attempt at that. Thanks.   — Jess· Δ♥ 04:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

All done. I hope that helps. If that wasn't what you were hoping for (or you think there's something else I can do to make it easier), let me know! Thanks!   — Jess· Δ♥ 04:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

That was exactly what I asked, thank you. On a different issue, however: You did not notify either editors, which you are required to do for valid AE requests. In both requests, add in ; Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested : , followed by the notification diff, at the bottom of your initial statement. If you need an idea what the format looks like, look at the editnotice of the AE page, click on click this link, and hit preview. - Penwhale | 06:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Heh. Yea, it was a long night. They were both aware of the NEG thread (I had notified Tillman already). I just posted to let them both know of the move to a new section. Thanks Penwhale!   — Jess· Δ♥ 12:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

William Lane Craig

The number of times that people refer to William Lane Craig mentioning his educational achievement or mentioning the terms 'Professor of Philosophy' or 'Philosophy Professor' should be noted in making decisions about what to put first in terms of philosopher, apologist, or theologian.

Moreover, along with the academic book references I have already contributed to the main Misplaced Pages page for William Lane Craig, two additional non-news sources are listed below which describe William Lane Craig as a philosopher and do not mention the words 'apologist', 'Christian apologist', 'theologian' nor 'Christian theologian'. The person responsible for the first source is an atheist. The person responsible for the second source is a Muslim. The only career title given to William Lane Craig in these two sources are as a philosopher.

• http://infidels.org/library/modern/dan_barker/kalamity.html
• http://www.hamzatzortzis.com/essays-articles/philosophy-theology/a-philosophical-perspective-on-the-uniqueness-of-the-quran/

A blog entry by an atheist cosmologist Sean Carroll states that he is a philosopher and theologian (the word 'apologist' only appears once and only in user comments, and not by Sean Carroll himself, further down the page):

• http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2011/04/05/debating-william-lane-craig/

Similarly, Peter S. Williams, author of A Faithful Guide to Philosophy: A Christian Introduction to the Love of Wisdom (2013; Milton Keynes: Paternoster; ISBN: 9781842278116), states in multiple blog entries that William Lane Craig is a 'Christian philosopher, theologian and apologist':

• Williams, Peter S. (2008) 'Craig vs. Cooke'. ID.Plus. Retrieved 11 August 2015.
• Williams, Peter S. (2009) 'William Lane Craig defends the viability of Intelligent Design Theory in Biology'. ID.Plus. Retrieved 11 August 2015.

I suspect that most academic in-text citations of William Lane Craig are similar to the format Craig (year) or Craig (year, page number) without any describing words. When published, particularly by philosophers other than William Lane Craig himself, in academic books on topics within philosophy and academic philosophy journals, the principle of charity could suggest that it is best to interpret that author as thinking of William Lane Craig in terms of being a philosopher first unless that philosopher has used another word to describe William Lane Craig in the journal article when first mentioning him, or unless the philosopher is using William Lane Craig's work to make a point unrelated to William Lane Craig's work in philosophy of religion, or perhaps unless that philosopher states that - in citing William Lane Craig - they are attempting to be interdisciplinary in their approach to writing the philosophy article/book and that they believe that William Lane Craig represents a different discipline to philosophy.

Col8lok8 (talk) 05:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Samuel Soal

I failed to revert far enough; that IP changed three times today. My edit summary was meant as a revert to your last, which you just restored. I'll do better next time. Scr★pIron 20:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Heh, I think you misunderstood my edit summary. I wasn't responding to you, I was responding to the ip, who said the content he was adding had been in the article for a long time, and was only recently removed. He was incorrect. You did a fine job, I was just cleaning up a few edits before the last one. :) He keeps hopping ips. Thanks for the message!   — Jess· Δ♥ 20:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

We were (mostly) on the same page - I was merely apologizing for not reverting far enough earlier. I cleaned up a little, but still left a mess behind for you to clean up :-) Have a great day! Scr★pIron 20:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

GOCE August 2015 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors August 2015 Newsletter July drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 24 people who signed up, 17 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. August blitz: The one-week April blitz, targeting biographical articles that have been tagged for copy editing for over a year, will run from August 16–22. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the article list on the blitz page. Sign up here! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, KieranTribe, Miniapolis, and Pax85. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

sent by Jonesey95 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:43, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Intelligent design

I was curious, and discovered that User:John.r.r has not made a single mainspace edit, only discussed topics on talk pages. Not that there's anything wrong with that, per se, I guess. I put a note on their talk page though, pointing out that they have the ability to edit articles as well. We'll see how that goes. --‖ Ebyabe - Union of Opposites ‖ 15:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Yep. SPAs that pop up like this are often not "new" editors. Who knows if that's the case here, but if it isn't, your advice might help him communicate a more concrete proposal. I don't think there's much to worry about now, someone just needs to work with him to learn the ropes, and unfortunately I don't have the time to take it on myself. Thanks for your note! I appreciate it! :)   — Jess· Δ♥ 18:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

October 2015 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors October 2015 Newsletter September drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 25 editors who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. October blitz: The one-week October blitz, targeting requests, has just concluded. Of the nine editors who signed up, seven copyedited at least one request; check your talk page for your barnstar! The month-long November drive, focusing on our oldest backlog articles (June, July, and August 2014) and the October requests, is just around the corner. Hope to see you there! Thanks again for your support; together, we can improve the encyclopedia! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, KieranTribe, Miniapolis and Pax85. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2015 End of Year Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2015 End of Year Report Our 2015 End of Year Report is now ready for review. Highlights: Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page; New record lows in the article backlog and on the Requests page; Coordinator election results; Membership news; Changes around the Guild's pages; Plans for 2016. – Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by Jonesey95 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Checking in

I hope you are ok. You have not been active on Misplaced Pages since September of last year. Be cool. :) --‖ Ebyabe - Attract and Repel ‖ 02:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Jess has been active. Are you his sock puppet account? Sleepwalk7 (talk) 04:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes, Jess has been active. But Mann jess has not. I'm not a sockpuppet, just someone who watches this page. And reverts vandalism and personal attacks. Are you a sockpuppet? --‖ Ebyabe - Border Town ‖ 05:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Hey guys. These accounts both belong to the same person. My user page lists this account as an alt of mine (it used to be the opposite). Thanks for the concern! I'm still here!   — Jess· Δ♥ 05:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Climate forcing, Intro

Dear "Jess"

I've put some discussive text in the talk section of the 'Radiative forcing' entry, as a reaction to your reversal of my change a few days ago. I would like to hear your opinion on this.

Best regards

Torben Schmith Senior scientist Danish Meteorological Institute, Denmark — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torben.schmith (talk • contribs) 12:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter March drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 28 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April blitz: The one-week April blitz, again targeting our long requests list, will run from April 17–23. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the requests page. Sign up here! May drive: The month-long May backlog-reduction drive, with extra credit for articles tagged in March, April, and May 2015, and all request articles, begins May 1. Sign up now! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis, and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

June 2016 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2016 News Hello everyone, welcome to the June 2016 GOCE newsletter. It's been a few months since we sent one out; we hope y'all haven't forgotten about the Guild! Your coordinators have been busy behind the scenes as usual, though real life has a habit of reducing our personal wiki-time. The May backlog reduction drive, the usual coordinating tasks and preparations for the June election are keeping us on our toes! May drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's record-setting backlog reduction drive. Of the 29 people who signed up, 16 copyedited at least one article, 197 copyedits were recorded on the drive page, and the copyedit backlog fell below 1,500 for the first time! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. June Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz will occur from 12 June through 18 June; the themes will be video games and Asian geography. Coordinator elections: It's election time again; how quickly they seem to roll around! Nominations for the next tranche of Guild coordinators, who will serve a six-month term that begins at 00:01 UTC on 1 July and ends at 23:59 UTC on 31 December, opens at 00:01 UTC on 1 June and closes at 23:59 UTC on 15 June. Voting takes place between 00:01 UTC on 16 June and 23:59 UTC on 30 June. If you'd like to assist behind the scenes, please consider stepping forward; self-nominations are welcomed and encouraged. All Misplaced Pages editors in good standing are eligible; remember it's your Guild, and it doesn't run itself! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News

Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News Hello everyone, and welcome to the July 2016 GOCE newsletter. June Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 12 through 18 June; the themes were video games and Asian geography. Of the 18 editors who signed up, 11 removed 47 articles from the backlog. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part. Coordinator elections: The second tranche of Guild coordinators for 2016, who will serve a six-month term until 23:59 UTC on 31 December, have been elected. Jonesey95 remains as your drama-free Lead Coordinator, and Corinne and Tdslk are your new assistant coordinators. For her long service to the Guild, Miniapolis has been enrolled in the GOCE Hall of Fame. Thanks to everyone who voted in the election; our next scheduled one occurs in December 2016. All Misplaced Pages editors in good standing are eligible; self-nominations are welcome and encouraged. July Drive: Our month-long July Copy Editing Backlog Elimination Drive is now underway. Our aim is to remove articles tagged for copy-edit in April, May and June 2015, and to complete all requests on the GOCE Requests page from June 2016. The drive ends at 23:59 on 31 July 2016 (UTC). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdlsk. >>> Sign up for the July Drive! <<<

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News

Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News Hello everyone, and welcome to the September 2016 GOCE newsletter. >>> Sign up for the September Drive, already in progress! <<< July Drive: The July drive was a roaring success. We set out to remove April, May, and June 2015 from our backlog (our 149 oldest articles), and by 23 July, we were done with those months. We added July 2015 (66 articles) and copy-edited 37 of those. We also handled all of the remaining Requests from June 2016. Well done! Overall, we recorded copy edits to 240 articles by 20 editors, reducing our total backlog to 13 months and 1,656 articles, the second-lowest month-end total ever. August Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 21 through 27 August; the theme was sports-related articles in honor of the 2016 Summer Olympics. Of the eight editors who signed up, five editors removed 11 articles from the backlog. A quiet blitz – everyone must be on vacation. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdlsk. >>> Sign up for the September Drive! <<<

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News

Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News Hello everyone, and welcome to the December 2016 GOCE newsletter. We had an October newsletter all set to go, but it looks like we never pushed the button to deliver it, so this one contains a few months of updates. We have been busy and successful! >>> Sign up for the December Blitz! <<< Coordinator elections for the first half of 2017: Nominations are open for election of Coordinators for the first half of 2017. Please visit the election page to nominate yourself or another editor, and then return after December 15 to vote. Thanks for participating! September Drive: The September drive was fruitful. We set out to remove July through October 2015 from our backlog (an ambitious 269 articles), and by the end of the month, we had cut that pile of oldest articles to just 83. We reduced our overall backlog by 97 articles, even with new copyedit tags being added to articles every day. We also handled 75% of the remaining Requests from August 2016. Overall, 19 editors recorded copy edits to 233 articles (over 378,000 words). October Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 16 through 22 October; the theme was Requests, since the backlog was getting a bit long. Of the 16 editors who signed up, 10 editors completed 29 requests. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part. November Drive: The November drive was a record-breaker! We set out to remove September through December 2015 from our backlog (239 articles), and by the end of the month, we had cut that pile of old articles to just 66, eliminating the two oldest months! We reduced our overall backlog by 523 articles, to a new record low of 1,414 articles, even with new tags being added to articles every day, which means we removed copy-editing tags from over 800 articles. We also handled all of the remaining Requests from October 2016. Officially, 14 editors recorded copy edits to 200 articles (over 312,000 words), but over 600 articles, usually quick fixes and short articles, were not recorded on the drive page. Housekeeping note: we do not send a newsletter before every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your Watchlist. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdslk. >>> Sign up for the December Blitz! <<<

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News

Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News Hello everyone, and welcome to the February 2017 GOCE newsletter. The Guild has been busy since the last time your coordinators sent out a newsletter! >>> Sign up for the March Drive! <<< December blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 11 through 17 December; the themes were Requests and eliminating the November 2015 backlog. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine editors completed 29 articles. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all who took part. January drive: The January drive was a great success. We set out to remove December 2015 and January and February 2016 from our backlog (195 articles), and by 22 January we had cleared those and had to add a third month (March 2016). At the end of the month we had almost cleared out that last month as well, for a total of 180 old articles removed from the backlog! We reduced our overall backlog by 337 articles, to a low of 1,465 articles, our second-lowest month-end total ever. We also handled all of the remaining requests from December 2016. Officially, 19 editors recorded 337 copy edits (over 679,000 words). February blitz: The one-week February blitz, focusing on the remaining March 2016 backlog and January 2017 requests, ran from 12 to 18 February. Seven editors reduced the total in those two backlog segments from 32 to 10 articles, leaving us in good shape going in to the March drive. Coordinator elections for the first half of 2017: In December, coordinators for the first half of 2017 were elected. Jonesey95 stepped aside as lead coordinator, remaining as coordinator and allowing Miniapolis to be the lead, and Tdslk and Corinne returned as coordinators. Thanks to all who participated! Speaking of coordinators, congratulations to Jonesey95 on their well-deserved induction into the Guild of Copy Editors Hall of Fame. The plaque reads: "For dedicated service as lead coordinator (2014, 1 July – 31 December 2015 and all of 2016) and coordinator (1 January – 30 June 2015 and 1 January – 30 June 2017); exceptional template-creation work (considerably streamlining project administration), and their emphasis on keeping the GOCE a drama-free zone." Housekeeping note: We do not send a newsletter before every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your watchlist. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdslk. >>> Sign up for the March Drive! <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

editing suggestions

Can I make suggestions for a page as opposed to editing it myself ? And where would I do that. HPearce (talk) 00:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

@Howardpearce: Yes, you absolutely can! Click on the "Talk" link at the top left of any page, and you'll find a place that is devoted just to discussion about the article with other editors. There, you can create a new section (just like you did here!) and suggest a change for other editors to discuss. I'm not altogether too active nowadays, but feel free to reach out if you have any trouble. All the best,   — Jess· Δ♥ 00:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mann jess. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News Hello copy editors! Welcome to the December 2017 GOCE newsletter, which contains nine months(!) of updates. The Guild has been busy and successful; your diligent efforts in 2017 has brought the backlog of articles requiring copy edit to below 1,000 articles for the first time. Thanks to all editors who have contributed their time and energy to help make this happen. >>> Sign up for the January Drive! <<< >>> Participate in the Coordinator Elections! <<< Our copy-editing drives (month-long backlog-reduction drives held in odd-numbered months) and blitzes (week-long themed editing in even-numbered months) have been very successful this year. March drive: We set out to remove April, May, and June 2016 from our backlog and all February 2017 Requests (a total of 304 articles). By the end of the month, all but 22 of these articles were cleared. Officially, of the 28 who signed up, 22 editors recorded 257 copy edits (439,952 words). (These numbers do not always make sense when you compare them to the overall reduction in the backlog, because not all editors record every copy edit on the drive page.) April blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 16 through 22 April; the theme was Requests. Of the 15 who signed up, 9 editors completed 43 articles (81,822 words). May drive: The goals were to remove July, August, and September 2016 from the backlog and to complete all March 2017 Requests (a total of 300 articles). By the end of the month, we had reduced our overall backlog to an all-time low of 1,388 articles. Of the 28 who signed up, 17 editors completed 187 articles (321,810 words). June blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 18 through 24 June; the theme was Requests. Of the 16 who signed up, 9 editors completed 28 copy edits (117,089 words). 2017 Coordinator elections: In June, coordinators for the second half of 2017 were elected. Jonesey95 moved back into the lead coordinator position, with Miniapolis stepping down to remain as coordinator; Tdslk and Corinne returned as coordinators, and Keira1996 rejoined after an extended absence. Thanks to all who participated! July drive: We set out to remove August, September, October, and November 2016 from the backlog and to complete all May and June 2017 Requests (a total of 242 articles). The drive was an enormous success, and the target was nearly achieved within three weeks, so that December 2016 was added to the "old articles" list used as a goal for the drive. By the end of the month, only three articles from 2016 remained, and for the second drive in a row, the backlog was reduced to a new all-time low, this time to 1,363 articles. Of the 33 who signed up, 21 editors completed 337 articles (556,482 words). August blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 20 through 26 August; the theme was biographical articles tagged for copy editing for more than six months (47 articles). Of the 13 who signed up, 11 editors completed 38 copy edits (42,589 words). September drive: The goals were to remove January, February, and March 2017 from the backlog and to complete all August 2017 Requests (a total of 338 articles). Of the 19 who signed up, 14 editors completed 121 copy edits (267,227 words). October blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 22 through 28 October; the theme was Requests. Of the 14 who signed up, 8 editors completed 20 articles (55,642 words). November drive: We set out again to remove January, February, and March 2017 from the backlog and to complete all October 2017 Requests (a total of 207 articles). By the end of the month, these goals were reached and the backlog shrank to its lowest total ever, 997 articles, the first time it had fallen under one thousand (click on the graph above to see this amazing feat in graphical form). It was also the first time that the oldest copy-edit tag was less than eight months old. Of the 25 who signed up, 16 editors completed 159 articles (285,929 words). 2018 Coordinator elections: Voting is open for the election of coordinators for the first half of 2018. Please visit the election page to vote between now and December 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Thanks for participating! Housekeeping note: We do not send a newsletter before (or after) every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your watchlist. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Miniapolis, Corinne, Tdslk, and Keira1996. >>> Sign up for the January Drive! <<< >>> Participate in the Coordinator Elections! <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

GOCE February 2018 news

Guild of Copy Editors February 2018 News Welcome to the February 2018 GOCE newsletter in which you will find Guild updates since the December edition. We got to a great start for the year, holding the backlog at nine months. 100 requests were submitted in the first 6 weeks of the year and were swiftly handled with an average completion time of 9 days. >>> Sign up for the March Drive! <<< Coordinator elections: In December, coordinators for the first half of 2018 were elected. Jonesey95 remained as lead coordinator and Corrine, Miniapolis and Tdslk as assistant coordinators. Keira1996 stepped down as assistant coordinator and was replaced by Reidgreg. Thanks to all who participated! End of year reports were prepared for 2016 and 2017, providing a detailed look at the Guild's long-term progress. January drive: We set out to remove April, May, and June 2017 from our backlog and all December 2017 Requests (a total of 275 articles). As with previous years, the January drive was an outstanding success and by the end of the month all but 57 of these articles were cleared. Officially, of the 38 who signed up, 21 editors recorded 259 copy edits (490,256 words). February blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 11 through 17 February, focusing on Requests and the last articles tagged in May 2017. At the end of the week there were only 14 pending requests, with none older than 20 days. Of the 11 who signed up, 10 editors completed 35 copy edits (98,538 words). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Miniapolis, Corinne, Tdslk, and Reidgreg. >>> Sign up for the March Drive! <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

June 2018 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2018 News Welcome to the June 2018 GOCE newsletter, in which you will find Guild updates since the February edition. Progress continues to be made on the copyediting backlog, which has been reduced to 7 months and reached a new all-time low. Requests continue to be handled efficiently this year, with 272 completed by the end of May (an average completion time of 10.5 days). Fewer than 10% of these waited longer than 20 days, and the longest wait time was 29 days. Misplaced Pages in general, and the Guild in particular, experienced a deep loss with the death on 20 March of Corinne. Corinne (a GOCE coordinator since 1 July 2016) was a tireless aide on the requests page, and her peerless copyediting is a part of innumerable GAs and FAs. Her good cheer, courtesy and tact are very much missed. March drive: The goal was to remove June, July and August 2017 from our backlog and all February 2018 Requests (a total of 219 articles). This drive was an outstanding success, and by the end of the month all but eight of these articles were cleared. Of the 33 editors who signed up, 19 recorded 277 copy edits (425,758 words). April blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 15 through 21 April, focusing on Requests and the last eight articles tagged in August 2017. At the end of the week there were only 17 pending requests, with none older than 17 days. Of the nine editors who signed up, eight editors completed 22 copy edits (62,412 words). May drive: We set out to remove September, October and November 2017 from our backlog and all April 2018 Requests (a total of 298 articles). There was great success this month with the backlog more than halved from 1,449 articles at the beginning of the month to a record low of 716 articles. Officially, of the 20 who signed up, 15 editors recorded 151 copy edits (248,813 words). Coordinator elections: It's election time again. Nominations for Guild coordinators (who will serve a six-month term for the second half of 2018) have begun, and will close at 23:59 UTC on 15 June. All Misplaced Pages editors in good standing are eligible, and self-nominations are encouraged. Voting will take place between 00:01 UTC on 16 June and 23:59 UTC on 30 June. June blitz: Stay tuned for this one-week copy-editing blitz, which will take place in mid-June. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Corinne, Jonesey95, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tdslk. >>> Participate in the June elections! <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

August GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors August 2018 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the August 2018 GOCE newsletter. Thanks to everyone who participated in the Guild's June election; your new and returning coordinators are listed below. The next election will occur in December 2018; all Misplaced Pages editors in good standing may take part. Our June blitz focused on Requests and articles tagged for copy edit in October 2017. Of the eleven people who signed up, eight editors recorded a total of 28 copy edits, including 3 articles of more than 10,000 words. Complete results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Thanks to everyone who participated in the July drive. Of the seventeen people who signed up, thirteen editors completed 194 copy edits, successfully removing all articles tagged in the last three months of 2017. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are here. The August blitz will run for one week, from 19 to 25 August. Sign up now! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Tdslk. >>> Sign up for the August blitz! <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

December 2018 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2018 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the December 2018 GOCE newsletter. Here is what's been happening since the August edition. Thanks to everyone who participated in the August blitz (results), which focused on Requests and the oldest backlog month. Of the twenty editors who signed up, eleven editors recorded 37 copy edits. For the September drive (results), of the twenty-three people who signed up, nineteen editors completed 294 copy edits. Our October blitz (results) focused on Requests, geography, and food and drink articles. Of the fourteen people who signed up, eleven recorded a total of 57 copy edits. For the November drive (results), twenty-two people signed up, and eighteen editors recorded 273 copy edits. This helped to bring the backlog to a six-month low of 825 articles. The December blitz will run for one week, from 16 to 22 December. Sign up now! Elections: Nominations for the Guild's coordinators for the first half of 2019 will be open from 1 to 15 December. Voting will then take place and the election will close on 31 December at 23:59 UTC. Positions for Guild coordinators, who perform the important behind-the-scenes tasks that keep our project running smoothly, are open to all Wikipedians in good standing. We welcome self-nominations, so please consider nominating yourself if you've ever thought about helping out; it's your Guild and it doesn't run itself! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators; Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Tdslk. >>> Sign up for the December blitz! <<< >>> Participate in the Coordinator elections! <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

GOCE 2018 Annual Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2018 Annual Report Our 2018 Annual Report is now ready for review. Highlights: Overview of Backlog-reduction progress; Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page; Membership news and results of elections; Annual leaderboard; Plans for 2019. – Your project coordinators: Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

March GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2019 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the March newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2018. All being well, we're planning to issue these quarterly in 2019, balancing the need to communicate widely with the avoidance of filling up talk pages. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. January Drive: Thanks to everyone for the splendid work in January's Backlog Elimination Drive. We removed copyedit tags from all of the articles tagged in our original target months of June, July and August 2018, and by 24 January we ran out of articles. After adding September, we finished the month with 8 target articles remaining and 842 left in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 48 requests for copyedit in January. Of the 31 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the February Blitz. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 32 copyedits, including 15 requests. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: As of 23:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 108 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 851 articles. March Drive: The month-long March drive is now underway; the target months are October and November 2018. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Sign up here! Election reminder: It may only be March but don't forget our mid-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2019 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since March 2019. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below. Election time: Nomination of candidates in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 1 June, and voting will take place from 16 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. June Blitz: Our June blitz will soon be upon us; it will begin at 00:01 on 16 June (UTC) and will close at 23:59 on 22 June (UTC). The themes are "nature and the environment" and all requests. March Drive: Thanks to everyone for their work in March's Backlog Elimination Drive. We removed copyedit tags from 182 of the articles tagged in our original target months October and November 2018, and the month finished with 64 target articles remaining from November and 811 in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 22 requests for copyedit in March; the month ended with 34 requests pending. Of the 32 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the April Blitz; the blitz ran from 14 to 20 April (UTC) inclusive and the themes were Sports and Entertainment. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: As of 04:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 267 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stands at 605 articles. May Drive: During the May Backlog Elimination Drive, Guild copy-editors removed copyedit tags from 191 of the 192 articles tagged in our original target months of November and December 2018, and January 2019 was added on 22 May. We finished the month with 81 target articles remaining and a record low of 598 articles in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 24 requests for copyedit during the May drive, and the month ended with 35 requests pending. Of the 26 people who signed up for this drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 GOCE Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2019 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2019. June election: Reidgreg was chosen as lead coordinator, and is being assisted by Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk, and first-time coordinator Twofingered Typist. Jonesey95 took a respite after serving for six years. Thanks to everyone who participated! June Blitz: From 16 to 22 June, we copy edited articles on the themes of nature and the environment along with requests. 12 participating editors completed 35 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: The year's fourth backlog-elimination drive was a great success, clearing all articles tagged in January and February, and bringing the copy-editing backlog to a low of five months and a record low of 585 articles while also completing 48 requests. Of the 30 people who signed up, 29 copyedited at least one article, a participation level last matched in May 2015. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 18 to 24 August, we copy edited articles tagged in March 2019 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: As of 03:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 413 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stood at 599 articles, close to our record month-end low of 585. Requests page: We are experimenting with automated archiving of copy edit requests; a discussion on REQ Talk (permalinked) initiated by Bobbychan193 has resulted in Zhuyifei1999 writing a bot script for the Guild. Testing is now underway and is expected to be completed by 3 October; for this reason, no manual archiving of requests should be done until the testing period is over. We will then assess the bot's performance and discuss whether to make this arrangement permanent. September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

GOCE December 2019 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2019 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the December 2019 GOCE newsletter, an update of Guild happenings since the September edition. Our Annual Report should be ready in late January. Election time: Nominations for the election of a new tranche of Guild coordinators to serve for the first half of 2020 will be open from 1 to 15 December. Voting will then take place and the election will close on 31 December at 23:59 UTC. Positions for Guild coordinators, who perform the important behind-the-scenes tasks that keep our project running smoothly, are open to all Wikipedians in good standing. We welcome self-nominations so please consider nominating yourself if you've ever thought about helping out; it's your Guild and it doesn't run itself! September Drive: Of the thirty-two editors who signed up, twenty-three editors copy edited at least one article; they completed 39 requests and removed 138 articles from the backlog, bringing the backlog to a low of 519 articles. October Blitz: This event ran from 13 to 19 October, with themes of science, technology and transport articles tagged for copy edit, and Requests. Sixteen editors helped remove 29 articles from the backlog and completed 23 requests. November Drive: Of the twenty-eight editors who signed up for this event, twenty editors completed at least one copy edit; they completed 29 requests and removed 133 articles from the backlog. Our December Blitz will run from 15 to 21 December. Sign up now! Progress report: From September to November 2019, GOCE copy editors processed 154 requests. Over the same period, the backlog of articles tagged for copy editing was reduced by 41% to an all-time low of 479 articles. Request archiving: The archiving of completed requests has now been automated. Thanks to Zhuyifei1999 and Bobbychan193, YiFeiBot is now archiving the Requests page. Archiving occurs around 24 hours after a user's signature and one of the templates {{Done}}, {{Withdrawn}} or {{Declined}} are placed below the request. The bot uses the Guild's standard "purpose codes" to determine the way it should archive each request so it's important to use the correct codes and templates. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators; Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. >>> Sign up for the December blitz! <<< >>> Participate in the Coordinator elections! <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 2019 Annual Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2019 Annual Report Our 2019 Annual Report is now ready for review. Highlights: Overview of Backlog-reduction progress (a record low backlog!); Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page; Automated archiving of requests; Membership news and results of elections; Annual leaderboard; Plans for 2020. – Your Guild coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

GOCE March newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2020 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the March newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2019. All being well, we're planning to issue these quarterly in 2020, balancing the need to communicate widely with the avoidance of filling up talk pages. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election results: There was little changeover in the roster of Guild Coordinators, with Miniapolis stepping down with distinction as a coordinator emeritus while Jonesey95 returned as lead coordinator. The next election is scheduled for June 2020 and all Wikipedians in good standing may participate. January Drive: Thanks to everyone for the splendid work, completing 215 copy edits including 56 articles from the Requests page and 116 backlog articles from the target months of June to August 2019. At the conclusion of the drive there was a record low of 323 articles in the copy editing backlog. Of the 27 editors who signed up for the drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. February Blitz: Of the 15 editors who signed up for this one-week blitz, 13 completed at least one copy edit. A total of 32 articles were copy edited, evenly split between the twin goals of requests and the oldest articles from the copy-editing backlog. Full results are here. March Drive: Currently underway, this event is targeting requests and backlog articles from September to November 2019. As of 18 March, the backlog stands at a record low of 253 articles and is expected to drop further as the drive progresses. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Help set a new record and sign up now! Progress report: As of 18 March, GOCE copyeditors have completed 161 requests in 2020 and there was a net reduction of 385 articles from the copy-editing backlog – a 60% decrease from the beginning of the year. Well done and thank you everyone! Election reminder: It may only be March but don't forget our mid-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2020 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since March 2020. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below. All times and dates stated are in UTC. Current events Election time: Nomination of candidates in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 1 June, and voting will take place from 00:01 on 16 June. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought about helping out at the Guild, or you know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. June Blitz: This blitz begins at 00:01 on 14 June and ends at 23:59 on 20 June, with themes of articles tagged for copyedit in May 2020 and requests. Drive and blitz reports March Drive: Self-isolation from coronavirus may have played a hand in making this one of our most successful backlog elimination drives. The copy-editing backlog was reduced from 477 to a record low of 118 articles, a 75% reduction. The last four months of 2019 were cleared, reducing the backlog to three months. Fifty requests were also completed, and the total word count of copy-edited articles was 759,945. Of the 29 editors who signed up, 22 completed at least one copy edit. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April Blitz: This blitz ran from 12 to 18 April with a theme of Indian military history. Of the 18 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed a total of 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. May Drive: This event marked the 10th anniversary of the GOCE's copy-editing drives, and set a goal of diminishing the backlog to just one month of articles, as close to zero articles as possible. We achieved the goal of eliminating all articles that had been tagged prior to the start of the drive, for the first time in our history! Of the 51 editors who signed up, 43 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Other news Progress report: as of 2 June, GOCE participants had processed 328 requests since 1 January, which puts us on pace to exceed any previous year's number of requests. As of the end of the May drive, the backlog stood at just 156 articles, all tagged in May 2020. Outreach: To mark the 10th anniversary of our first Backlog Elimination Drive, The Signpost contributor and GOCE participant Puddleglum2.0 interviewed project coordinators and copy-editors for the journal's April WikiProject Report. The Drive and the current Election of Coordinators have also been covered in The Signpost's May News and Notes page. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC).

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2020.                  Current and upcoming events September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Election reminder: our end-of-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 December. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. Drive and Blitz reports June Blitz: An uncorrected typo (even copy editors make copy editing mistakes!) led to an eight-day "leap blitz" from 14 to 21 June, focusing on requests and articles tagged in May. 19 participating editors claimed 54 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: Over 750,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event, keeping pace with the previous three self-isolated drives. Of the 38 people who signed up, 30 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 16 to 22 August, we copy edited articles tagged in June and July 2020 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 37 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Other news June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Baffle gab1978, Tdslk, Twofingered Typist, and first-time coordinator Puddleglum2.0. Reidgreg took a break after serving for a couple years. Thanks to everyone who participated! Progress report: As of 01:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 532 requests since 1 January and there were 38 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Puddleglum2.0, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

December 2020 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2020 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2020.                  Current and upcoming events Election time: our end-of-year Election of Coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before Auld Lang Syne. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. December Blitz: This will run from 13 to 19 December, and will target all Requests. Sign up now. Drive and Blitz reports September Drive: 67 fewer articles had copy-edit templates by this month's close. Of the 27 editors who signed up, 15 copy-edited at least one article, and 124 articles were claimed for the drive. October Blitz: this ran from 18 to 24 October, and focused on articles tagged for copy-edit in July and August 2020, and all Requests. Of the 13 who signed up, 11 editors copy-edited at least one article. 21 articles were claimed for the blitz. November Drive: Of the 18 editors who signed up, 15 copy-edited at least one article, and together claimed 134 articles. At the close of the drive, 67 fewer articles were in the backlog and we had dealt with 39 requests. Other news Progress report: As of 09:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 663 requests (18 from 2019) since 1 January and there were 52 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 494 (see monthly progress graph above). Annual Report for 2020: this roundup of the year's activity at the Guild is planned for publication in late January or early February. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Seasonal tidings and cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Puddleglum2.0, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

GOCE June 2021 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2021 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, our first newsletter of 2021, which is a brief update of Guild activities since December 2020. To unsubscribe, follow the link at the bottom of this box. Current events Election time: Voting in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 16 June and will conclude at the end of the month. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Have your say and show support here. June Blitz: Our June copy-editing blitz is underway and will conclude on 26 June. Drive and blitz reports January Drive: 28 editors completed 324 copy edits totalling 714,902 words. At the end of the drive, the backlog had reached a record low of 52 articles. (full results) February Blitz: 15 editors completed 48 copy edits totalling 142,788 words. (full results) March Drive: 29 editors completed 215 copy edits totalling 407,736 words. (full results) April Blitz: 12 editors completed 23 copy edits totalling 56,574 words. (full results) May Drive: 29 editors completed 356 copy edits totalling 479,013 words. (full results) Other news Progress report: as of 26 June, GOCE participants had completed 343 Requests since 1 January. The backlog has fluctuated but remained in control, with a low of 52 tagged articles at the end of January and a high of 620 articles in mid-June. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu and Twofingered Typist, and from member Reidgreg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC).

September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2021 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2021.                  Current and upcoming events September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Drive and Blitz reports June Blitz: From 20 to 26 June, 6 participating editors claimed 16 copy edits, focusing on requests and articles tagged in March and April. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: Almost 575,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 24 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 15 to 21 August, we copy edited articles tagged in April and May 2021 and requests. 9 participating editors completed 17 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Other news June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. New maintenance template added to our project scope: After a short discussion in June, we added {{cleanup tense}} to the list of maintenance templates that adds articles to the Guild's copy editing backlog categories. This change added 198 articles, spread over 97 months of backlog, to our queue. We processed all of those articles except for those from the three or four most recent months during the July backlog elimination drive (Here's a link to a "tense" discussion during the drive). Progress report: As of 18:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 468 requests since 1 January and there were 60 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 GOCE Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2021 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2021.                  Current and upcoming events Election time: Our end-of-year election of coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before "Auld Lang Syne". Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. December Blitz: We have scheduled a week-long copy-editing blitz for 12 to 18 December. Sign up now! Drive and Blitz reports September Drive: Almost 400,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 27 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. October Blitz: From 17 to 23 October, we copy edited articles tagged in May and June 2021 and requests. 8 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. November Drive: Over 350,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 21 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. Other news It is with great sadness that we report the death on 19 November of Twofingered Typist, who was active with the Guild almost daily for the past several years. His contributions long exceeded the thresholds for the Guild's highest awards, and he had a hand in innumerable good and featured article promotions as a willing collaborator. Twofingered Typist also served as a Guild coordinator from July 2019 to June 2021. He is sorely missed by the Misplaced Pages community. Progress report: As of 30 November, GOCE copyeditors have completed 619 requests in 2021 and there were 51 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog stood at 946 articles tagged for copy-editing (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

GOCE April 2022 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors April 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the April newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2021. Election results: Jonesey95 retired as lead coordinator. Reidgreg was approved to fill this role after an 18-month absence from the coordinator team, and Baffle gab1978 was chosen as an assistant coordinator following a one-year break. Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu continued on as long-standing assistant coordinators. January Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up, 16 editors claimed 146 copy edits including 45 requests. (details) February Blitz: This one-week effort focused on requests and a theme of Africa and African diaspora history. Of the 12 editors who signed up, 6 editors recorded 21 copy edits, including 4 requests. (details) March Drive: Of the 28 editors who signed up, 18 claimed 116 copy edits including 25 requests. (details) April Blitz: This one-week copy editing event has been scheduled for 17–23 April, sign up now! Progress report: As of 11 April, copy editors have removed approximately 500 articles from the backlog and completed 127 copy-editing requests during 2022. The backlog has been hovering at about 1,100 tagged articles for the past six months. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

June GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June 2022 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since April 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Blitz: of the 16 editors who signed up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, 12 completed at least one copy-edit, and between them removed 21 articles from the copy-editing backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 27 editors signed up for our May Backlog Elimination Drive; of these, 20 copy-edited at least one article. 144 articles were copy-edited, and 88 articles from our target months August and September 2021 were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: our June Copy Editing Blitz, starting at 00:01, 19 June and closing at 00:59, 25 June (UTC), will focus on articles tagged for copy edit in September and October 2021, and requests from March, April and May 2022. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 07:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 209 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,404 articles. Election news: Nominations for our half-yearly Election of Coordinators continues until 23:50 on 15 June (UTC), after which, voting will commence until 23:59, 30 June (UTC). All Wikipedians in good standing (active and not blocked, banned, or under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors October 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up for our July Backlog Elimination Drive, 18 copy-edited, between them, 116 articles. Barnstars awarded are noted here. Blitz: Participants in our August Copy Editing Blitz copy-edited 51,074 words in 17 articles. Of the 15 editors who signed up, 11 claimed at least one copy-edit. Barnstars awarded are noted here. Drive: Forty-one editors took part in our September Backlog Elimination Drive; between them they copy-edited 199 articles. Barnstars awards are noted here. Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz begins on 16 October at 00:01 (UTC) and will end on 22 October at 23:59 (UTC). Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 19:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 303 requests for copy edit – including withdrawn and declined ones – since 1 January. At the time of writing, there are 77 requests awaiting attention and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,759. We always need more active, skilled copyeditors – particularly for requests – so please get involved if you can. Election news: In our mid-year election, serving coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tenryuu were returned for another term, and were joined by new coordinator Zippybonzo. No lead coordinator was elected for this half-year. Jonesey95, a long-serving coordinator and lead, was elected as coordinator emeritus; we thank them for their service. Thank you to everyone who took part. Our next election of coordinators takes place throughout December. If you'd like to help out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself or other suitable editors (with their permission, of course!). It's your Guild, after all! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tenryuu and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Baffle☿gab 03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since October. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz focused on July and August 2022 request months; and articles tagged for c/e in December 2021 and January 2022. Seventeen of those who signed up claimed at least one copy-edit, and between them copy-edited forty-six articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: In the November Backlog Elimination Drive, thirty editors signed up, twenty-two of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Both target months—December 2021 and January 2022—were cleared, and February was added to the target months. Sixteen requests were copy-edited and 239 articles were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Our seven-day-long December 2022 Copy Editing Blitz begins on 17 December at 00:01 (UTC)*. It will focus on articles tagged for copy-edit in February 2022, and pending requests from September and October. Barnstars awarded will be available here. Progress report: As of 22:40, 8 December 2022, GOCE copyeditors have processed 357 requests since 1 January, there were seventy-four requests outstanding and the backlog stands at 1,791 articles. We always need skilled copy-editors; please help out if you can. Election news: Nomination of candidates for the GOCE's Election of Coordinators for the first half of 2023 is open and continues until 23:59 on 15 December. Voting begins at 00:01 on 16 December and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Coordinators serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on June 30. If you've thought about helping out at the Guild, please nominate yourself or any editor you consider suitable—with their permission, of course!. It's your Guild and it doesn't coordinate itself. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers and best seasonal wishes from your GOCE coordinators, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu, and Zippybonzo. *All times and dates on this newsletter are UTC. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter error

The GOCE December 2022 newsletter, as sent on 9 December, contains an erroneous start date for our December Blitz. The Blitz will start on 11 December rather than on 17 December, as stated in the newsletter. I'm sorry for the mistake and for disrupting your talk page; thanks for your understanding. Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report Our 2022 Annual Report is now ready for review. Highlights: Overview of Backlog-reduction progress Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page Membership news and results of elections Closing words – Your Guild coordinators: Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the March 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December and our Annual Report for 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members, including those who have signed up for our current March Backlog Elimination Drive. We wish you all happy copy-editing. Election results: In our December 2022 coordinator election, Reidgreg and Tenryuu stepped down as coordinators; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo were returned as coordinators until 1 July. For the second time, no lead coordinator was chosen. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators open on 1 June (UTC). Drive: 21 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive, 14 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 170 articles totaling 389,737 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Our February Copy Editing Blitz focused on October and November 2022 requests, and the March and April 2022 backlogs. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine claimed at least one copy-edit; and between them, they copy-edited 39,150 words in 22 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: Sign up now for our month-long March Backlog Elimination Drive. Barnstars awarded will be posted here after the drive closes. Progress report: As of 12:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 73 requests since 1 January 2023, all but five of them from 2022, and the backlog stands at 1,872 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Guild of Copy Editors June 2023 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2023 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since March. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: Fancy helping out at the Guild? Nominations for our half-yearly Election of Coordinators are open until 23:59 on 15 June (UTC)*. Starting immediately after, the voting phase will run until 23:59 on 30 June. All Wikipedians in good standing are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed; it's your Guild and it doesn't organize itself! Blitz: Of the 17 editors who signed up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, nine editors completed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 24 articles totaling 53,393 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 51 editors signed up for the month-long May Backlog Elimination Drive, and 31 copy-edited at least one article. 180 articles were copy-edited. Barnstars awarded are posted here. Blitz: Sign up here for our week-long June Copy Editing Blitz, which runs from 11 to 17 June. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 03:09 on 6 June 2023, GOCE copyeditors have processed 91 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,887 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybongo. *All times and dates in this newsletter are in UTC, and may significantly vary from your local time. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Septermber GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2023 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the September 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. David Thomsen: Prolific Wikipedian and Guild member David Thomsen (Dthomsen8) died in November 2022. He was a regular copy editor who took part in many of our Drives and Blitzes. An obituary was published in the mid-July issue of The Signpost. Tributes can be left on David's talk page. Election news: In our mid-year Election of Coordinators, Dhtwiki was chosen as lead coordinator, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo continue as assistant coordinators, and Baffle gab1978 stepped down from the role. If you're interested in helping out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself for our next election in December; it's your WikiProject and it doesn't organize itself! June Blitz: Of the 17 editors who signed up for our June Copy Editing Blitz, 12 copy-edited at least one article. 70,035 words comprising 26 articles were copy-edited. Barnstars awarded are here. July Drive: 34 of the 51 editors who took part in our July Backlog Elimination Drive copy-edited at least one article. They edited 276 articles and 683,633 words between them. Barnstars awarded are here. August Blitz: In our August Copy Editing Blitz, 13 of the 16 editors who signed up worked on at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 79,608 words comprising 57 articles. Barnstars awarded are available here. September Drive: Sign up here for our month-long September Backlog Elimination Drive, which is now underway. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 14:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have processed 245 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,066. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter Hello, and welcome to the December 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. Don't forget that you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: The Guild needs coordinators! If you'd like to help out, you may nominate yourself or any suitable editor—with their permission—for the Election of Coordinators for the first half of 2024. Nominations will close at 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). Voting begins immediately after the close of nominations and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under current sanctions) are eligible, and self-nominations are welcome. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on 30 June. Drive: Of the 69 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 661,214 words in 290 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Blitz: Of the 22 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz, 13 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 109,327 words in 52 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Drive: During the November Backlog Elimination Drive, 38 of the 58 editors who signed up copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 458,620 words in 234 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Blitz: Our December Copy Editing Blitz will run from 10 to 16 December. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 344 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 2,191 articles. Other news: Our Annual Report for 2023 is planned for release in the new year. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2023 Annual Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2023 Annual Report Our 2023 Annual Report is now ready for review. Highlights: Introduction Membership news, obituary and election results Summary of Drives, Blitzes and the Requests page Closing words – Your Guild coordinators: Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Guild of Copy Editors April 2024 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors April 2024 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the April 2024 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members. We wish you all happy copy-editing. Election results: In our December 2023 coordinator election, Zippybonzo stepped down as coordinator; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Dhtwiki and Miniapolis were reelected coordinators, and Wracking was newly elected coordinator, to serve through 30 June. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators will open on 1 June (UTC). Drive: 46 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive, 32 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 289 articles totaling 626,729 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: 23 editors signed up for our February Copy Editing Blitz. 18 claimed at least one copy-edit and between them, they copy-edited 100,293 words in 32 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 53 editors signed up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive, 34 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 300 articles totaling 587,828 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Sign up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, which runs from 14 to 20 April. Barnstars will be awarded here. Progress report: As of 23:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 109 requests since 1 January 2024, and the backlog stands at 2,480 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Guild of Copy Editors June 2024 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2024 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June 2024 newsletter, a quarterly-ish digest of Guild activities since April. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: Wanted: new Guild coordinators! If you value and enjoy the GOCE, why not help out behind the scenes? Nominations for our mid-year coordinator election are now open until 23:59 on 15 June (UTC). Self-nominations are welcome. Voting commences at 00:01 on 16 June and continues until 23:50 on 30 June. Results will be announced at the election page. Blitz: Nine of the fourteen editors who signed up for the April 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 55,853 words comprising twenty articles. Barnstars awarded are available here. Drive: 58 editors signed up for our May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive and 33 of those completed at least one copy edit. 251 articles and 475,952 words were copy edited. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Our June 2024 Copy Editing Blitz will begin on 16 June and finish on 22 June. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 05:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC) , GOCE copyeditors have completed 161 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 2,779 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: Project coordinators play an important role in our WikiProject. Following the mid-year Election of Coordinators, we welcomed Mox Eden to the coordinator team. Dhtwiki remains as Lead Coordinator, and Miniapolis and Wracking returned as assistant coordinators. If you'd like to help out behind the scenes, please consider taking part in our December election – watchlist our ombox for updates. Information about the role of coordinators can be found here. Blitz: 13 of the 24 editors who signed up for the June 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 169,404 words comprising 41 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 38 of the 59 editors who signed up for the July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 482,133 words comprising 293 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: 10 of the 15 editors who signed up for the August 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 71,294 words comprising 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: Sign up here to earn barnstars in our month-long, in-progress September Backlog Elimination Drive. Progress report: As of 05:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 233 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,824 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we do without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Message sent by Baffle gab1978 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you no longer want this newsletter, you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist. Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure nearly everything runs smoothly and on time. Editors in good standing (unblocked and without sanctions) are invited to nominate themselves or another editor to be a Guild coordinator (with their permission, of course) until 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). The voting phase begins at 00:01 on 16 December and runs until 23:59 on 31 December. Questions may be asked of candidates at any stage in the process. Elected coordinators will serve a six-month term from 1 January through 30 June. Drive: In our September Backlog Elimination Drive, 67 editors signed up, 39 completed at least one copy edit, and between them they edited 682,696 words comprising 507 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: The October Copy Editing Blitz saw 16 editors sign-up, 15 of whom completed at least one copy edit. They edited 76,776 words comprising 35 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: In our November Backlog Elimination Drive, 432,320 words in 151 articles were copy edited. Of the 54 users who signed up, 33 copy edited at least one article. Barnstars awarded are posted here. Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 15 December (UTC) and will end on 21 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 22:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 333 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,401 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking. To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Message sent by Baffle_gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC).