| Revision as of 14:32, 20 January 2014 editNorth Atlanticist Usonian (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers17,513 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:55, 1 April 2024 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,170 edits Notification: listing of List of chat websites at WP:Articles for deletion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (39 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for November 9== | |||
| ==Repost of ]== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on {{#if:Hamza Tzortzis|]|a page you created}} requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages, because it appears to be a ] following a ]. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: ] which appears inside of the speedy deletion (<code><nowiki>{{db-...}}</nowiki></code>) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit ''']''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use ] instead of recreating the page. Thank you.<!-- Template: Uw-repost --><!-- Template:CSD-warn --> ] (]) 20:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Dude wth == | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Where are you? ] (]) 04:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for November 16== | |||
| ??? ] (]) 03:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| == Blocked for sockpuppetry == | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{Tmbox | |||
| | style = background: #f8eaba | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | text = '''''This account has been ] ''''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for ]{{#if:]| per evidence presented at ]}}. Note that multiple accounts are ], but using them for '']'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans ]. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to ]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the ] first. ] ] ] ] ♠ 21:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)<!-- Template:uw-sockblock -->}} | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:Principal religious texts == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] ] 20:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ==1 revert rule on the template infobox== | |||
| You reverted Hpunxkd at 11:22 and you reverted me just now at 20:06. Please self-revert. ] (]) 20:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 03:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==In defense of accuracy== | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| Syrian Resistance had been added to the sub-group section of the article, as a sub-group of Shabiha. When I created this page I designed it with the intention that the Main Conflict section would not include sub-groups. There simply isn't room. Please remove Syrian Resistance or make an argument on the talk page that either all 150 sub-groups should be included in the Main Conflict section, or that Syrian Resistance is not a sub-group of Shabiha (I did not make the edit that added Syrian Resistance to Shabiha), but I am trying to make the article accurate and consistent and it was necessary for that reason to remove Syrian Resistance from the main section. ] (]) 02:22, 17 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ]. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 03:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 18:41, 17 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==Category:FGM victims== | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 03:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692239519 --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| ==Category:Anti-FGM activists== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 04:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> - ] (]) 22:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Defense of legitimate editors == | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 01:47, 20 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| I see you have a barnstar on this subject. I am just getting started on it, would appreciate your opinion/comment/advice. Details in my user page. Thanks ] ] 04:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| can you help? | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Occupy_Wall_Street#Huge_section_on_Police_infiltration_is_completely_gone.21 16:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :'''The article offers no reliable sources to verify notability. This appears to be little more than a book from a religious group without notability.''' | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Good work Vinod 06:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == A page you started (Muslim denominations) has been reviewed! == | |||
| Thanks for creating ], North Atlanticist Usonian! | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ]<sub>]</sub> 16:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == November 2013 == | |||
| Misplaced Pages editor ] just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on . | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| *<nowiki>2013</ref><ref>http://www.inhershoesblog.com/fly-female-entrepreneurs Fly female entrepeneurs</nowiki>{{red|''']'''}}<nowiki> retrieved 29 November 2013</ref></nowiki> | |||
| Thanks, <!-- (0, -1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 21:28, 29 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, ''etc.''), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ]. | |||
| <blockquote>Excellent classification</blockquote> | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 12:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| To reply, leave a comment on Prof tpms's ]. | |||
| ==Contest== | |||
| Should i contest this? ] ] 14:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Why are you asking me this? ] (]) 14:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :: I figured you might have good experience on this and i was looking for a second opinion. ] ] 14:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::I see. What do your instincts tell you? ] (]) 15:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::: He has 14,000 hits on google so it seems okayish, so roughly 70% of my instinct says keep/contest. But since i'm not that good with biographies and you appear more experienced on that i figured I'd ask your opinion. ] ] 15:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::There actually appears to be only 4,970 hits on him; most either allude to one exhibition in 2012 or are mirrors or blogs/tumblrs. He's self-taught and that exhibition was also his first, so he's been at it professionally for a few months. Not sure whether that passes the ] notability threshold. ] (]) 15:50, 30 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Thanks ] ] 17:34, 1 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Wikipedian in community notice == | |||
| Dear {{PAGENAME}} | |||
| As a Wikipedian interested in African subjects and specifically Uganda, we thought you might be interested in the following opportunity. | |||
| WikiAfrica is looking for a Wikipedian in Community from Uganda to play a pivotal role in its project. This might be a position that you would consider. Or it could be the perfect opportunity for someone you know from this country, please spread the word! For more details, please look at this page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/call_for_wir_en/ | |||
| If you have any questions about the above, please contact isla on isla wikiafrica net : ] (]) | |||
| == Speedy deletion nomination of Amaal Nuux == | |||
| Hello Pass a Method, | |||
| I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ] for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. | |||
| If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can <span class="plainlinks">''''''</span>, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. | |||
| You can leave a note on ] if you have questions. ] (]) 05:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages guidelines == | |||
| This is the second time i've seen you moving a page by copy-pasting its content. The ] page states in bold letters; Do not move or rename a page by copying/pasting its content. Don't do it again please. Consider this a warning. ] ] 19:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi Pass a Method. Actually, the real issue is your continuous naming of pages away from their ]. Prior examples including at ] and ]. The A'maal Nuux page is only the latest example since "A'maal Nuux" is at least twice as common a name for her as "Amaal Nuux". This was explained in detail ] as well. Per the commonname policy, that's therefore where the page should have been to begin with. In future, please try and adhere to website policy. Regards, ] (]) 19:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :: I actually agree with the page move. I merely disagree with the method you chose to move the page. When something is '''bolded''' out on a guidelines, it is usually to add emphasis because of its importance. ] ] 19:48, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Hi == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| I must disagree with you about some page moves (), "createdness of the Quran" and "Quranic createdness" are two entirely different concepts. Does "accuracy of mathematics" and "mathematical accuracy" have similar meanings?] (]) 19:49, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :They are probably interchangeable, but the first title had a misspelling with a missplaced comma. ] ] 19:56, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for December 5== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Carlton alumni == | |||
| Thanks. But there's nothing on Sulekha Ali's wiki article to indicate she attended Carlton. ] (]) 21:18, 5 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Format == | |||
| 5000 m on Mo's personal best table is badly formatted. Maybe you can fix it please? Thanks ] ] 13:42, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I'll see what I can do. Regards, ] (]) 13:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Parameter== | |||
| Hi Pass a Method. Please note that per ], the ''related'' parameter is reserved for a "list of other ethnic groups related to the group", not for the same ethnic group geographically distributed elsewhere. Regards, ] (]) 17:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Zeila & Lughaya State== | |||
| Hi Pass a Method. May I ask why you reverted here? You do realize that the only proof of the existence of such an entity is a dead website , right? Regards, ] (]) 17:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : Oh, you did not mention that in the edit summary ] ] 17:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Actually, I wrote "re-direct project to main". If you didn't understand what that meant, all you had to do was ask. Your rationale that "they are not the same thing" is also inaccurate, btw. Regards, ] (]) 17:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Why move Nuclear program of Iran to Nuclear power in Iran == | |||
| You recently changed the name of this article in a way that I think is misleading. Iran's nuclear program is much broader than nuclear power, and one of the still unanswered questions is whether it is genuinely intended for peaceful nuclear power purposes. This name change was discussed months ago and the consensus was against. I'm not aware that there was a recent discussion. Please explain. ] (]) 16:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == December 2013 == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on . | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| *<nowiki>as Mo Farah coach Alberto Salazar agrees to help Britains middle and long distance runners</nowiki>{{red|''']'''}}<nowiki> retrieved 9 December, ]</ref></nowiki> | |||
| *<nowiki>500-most-influential-muslims-234033281.html Influencing Muslims: The 500 Most Influential Muslims</nowiki>{{red|''']'''}}<nowiki> retrieved 4 December 2013</ref></nowiki> | |||
| Thanks, <!-- (0, -1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 06:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == WP:SYNTHESIS == | |||
| But I wasn't combining multiple sources. I was citing just one source. ] (]) 16:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, then it would count as ]] ] 16:50, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::o.O? How is it OR if the guy cited in the source says 12-20 fighters (which is very specific) die each month since he was there which is April. ] (]) 16:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Yes, but thats not what you added to the article. You added a total number. You decided for yourself that we should count from April onwards. Thats clear original research. ] ] 17:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I'm not seeing it that way. I wrote in my own words (which Misplaced Pages requests from us) what in essence that guy said. He said 12-20 of their fighters die each month and that they have been involved since at least April. His sentence by all intents and purposes equals (12-20 times 8 months which is 96-160). You got editors writing in these many different war articles on different incidents. And when they write about a day in a conflict where the one source says, for example, 7 soldiers died in one incident and another 3 died in another incident during the same day, editors sum it up and say 10 died during the day. Its simple logic. Yes, it would be OR if we combined multiple different sources or statements from different individuals for one conclusion and that's something I too don't approve of. But, we are using here one statement, from one individual, from one news source. No multiple statements, no multiple individuals, no multiple news sources. ] (]) 19:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Tell me this, if you were writing an article about a two-day battle, and you got a source, a same source, that says that during the battle 40 people died the first day and 50 died during the second day, wouldn't you put in the battle's infobox that 90 died during the battle? ] (]) 19:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: First, the article does not state all were Iraqi. Second, the source does not make any calculations. No body counts. No hospital records. Its a figure that he came up with in the middle of a conversation. If thats not bad enough, you use that figure, and make add up how many months he was there and get a total? Give me a fucking break. ] ] 19:09, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::First, reply to your number 1 assertion. You are incorrect. The guy clearly states they were '''all''' Iraqi. Quoting the source for you. ''He reckons between 12 and 20 '''Iraqi volunteers''' are being killed in Syria every month.'' So, you must have missed that part. Second, an estimate of 12-20 dead per month is a body count in itself. Third, why would we need hospital records? Do we request hospital records for victims of an earthquake, or do we simply cite the figure that is given in a source? Fourth, since you cited ] for me, I will cite something else for you. ]. Quoting: ''Routine calculations do not count as original research, provided there is consensus among editors that the result of the calculation is obvious, correct, and a meaningful reflection of the sources.'' Fifth, please refrain from harsh language per ]. ] (]) 19:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::So, I have just one question now for you...Is 96-160 an obvious, correct and meaningful reflection of 12-20 dead per month for eight months? ] (]) 19:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::: You are forming a conclusion out of minimum words. Its possible that In May most volunteers were non-Iraqi. Its also possible that more people were dieing from June onwards compared to the previous months. Its also possible that he's giving the highest estimates from during the fiercest fighting and ignoring death toll figures from during the stalemate. its very vague language. Such arbitraqry numbers of "per month" are obviously contrary from facts on the ground which show a huge variation in fighting each month. ] ] 19:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::: Also the amount of fighting has ranged from heavy to zero at Zaynab sayyida, so a month by month calculus makes no sense in the first place ] ] 19:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Old age request == | |||
| I am writing you because you made recent edits to ]. Please be so kind as to review my draft of extensive editing at ] and my explanation on its Talk Page. What do you think about its possible use? I am a novice in Misplaced Pages procedures. Thanks. ] (]) 00:49, 12 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : Yes, it seems fine. Although i've only edited that page a couple of times. ] ] 00:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :: Thanks for your reply and encouragement. What should I now do? Replace the present ] article with the ] revision? Please advise. ] (]) 17:33, 12 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::: No. Its better to manually make the changes without all-out replacement. You can do it one by one if you feel thats best. ] ] 17:41, 12 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == A page you started (Quranic timeline) has been reviewed! == | |||
| Thanks for creating ], Pass a Method! | |||
| Misplaced Pages editor ] just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: | |||
| <blockquote>Nice start, but I hope you're going to maintain and expand the article! Note the wikilinking and punctuation I added.</blockquote> | |||
| To reply, leave a comment on Jennie Matthews 97's ]. | |||
| <small>Learn more about ].</small> | <small>Learn more about ].</small> | ||
| == Black voting rights listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Black voting rights'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 04:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == "Nawasib" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 07:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == "Misplaced Pages:CPOV" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for December 12== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ] Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been ] or removed because it was a misuse of a ]. Please use the ] for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our ] to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tempabuse1 --> ] (]) 17:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Euthanasia, Foreign policy, Froome == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see ] tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ] (]) 12:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Guitar== | |||
| Do not, '''do not''' identify '''PEOPLE''' by gender unless you are writing an article in which gender is a significant issue. | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| In these instances, you may need to draw distinction between male and female. | |||
| But '''do not''' label a picture '''FEMALE guitarist''' in an article about ]. | |||
| I do not know who you are or where you come from, but I do know that your sexist attitudes are forty years behind the times. | |||
| I do not believe that if it had been ] playing that guitar, you would have captioned it '''MALE guitarist'''. | |||
| The female has a name. Her name is on the file. It is ]. | |||
| This type of sexist labelling, as if a ''female'' needs to be identified as such, should be a thing of the past. Would you write "Black man playing a guitar"? "Homosexual playing a guitar"? "Amputee playing a guitar"? "Geriatric playing a guitar"? "Motor mechanic playing a guitar"? Tax agent playing a guitar"? "Female" is just as irrelevant! A guitarist is a guitarist. | |||
| ] (]) 12:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ], I'm not sure it is really meant that way or even intended to be even slightly offensive. On youtube for instance it's common to see "female guitarist", as it's typically a male-dominated instrument. A lot of girls/women even upload videos of themselves and label it "female guitarist". Even ] has said "let's face it, we tend to be men don't we" when asked who attends his clinics. It is quite rare to see a professional female guitarist in comparison to something like a pianist or violinist and I don't mean just a girl who sings and happens to strum a guitar in a band. You wouldn't get "female pianist" on the otherhand. So I can at least understand the thinking behind labeling it as such. For somebody as famous as Sinead though it does seem a strange choice to label her a "female guitarist" as if she's some unknown amateur musician. Personally I'd rather add a photo of a famous accomplished female professional guitarist like ] who is utterly beautiful in looks and playing and label it "Ana Vidovic" rather than Sinead who is more a singer accompanying her singing with some chords on a guitar or some amateur female player.. ♦ ] 21:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I accept that it wasn't ''intended to be offensive''. | |||
| :I comprehend the points that you are making. But the fact that the industry is male-dominated, (or even the fact that males might in general be better suited for a particular profession) is not a good enough reason. ''That excuse'' is used for labelling "female politician", "female doctor", "female bishop", "female police officer" and conversely "male nurse". | |||
| :It is simply typical of the deplorable lack of awareness of common social issues and social ignorance that affects an increasing number of individuals at the present time. | |||
| :] is a concept that is losing ground, rather than gaining it. | |||
| :From about 1975-2000 '''few intelligent, thinking, men''' (in the Western world) would have labelled a person as "female" unless the context was gender relevant. It simply wasn't acceptable. It was not "politically correct". | |||
| :What we have now is a distressing lack of social awareness. | |||
| :And with that lack of social awareness, we have a spiralling degree of social hostility, also affecting issues other than gender. In Britain it ranges from children tormenting other children to death at school, to the serious underrepresentation of women in Parliament. In Australia, the largest Anglican ] in the world still teaches women that they are subject to their husbands and may not teach males over the age of 18, and nobody is even bothering to fight it anymore. | |||
| :If my statement on this issue alerts yet another individual to the problems of gender stereotyping, then something has been achieved. | |||
| :Why are females in such a minority on Misplaced Pages, do you think? Why do they so often chose names that disguise their identities? | |||
| :I identify as Amanda. J. M. | |||
| :I am one of the 50% (or so) of the world's population who suffer gender discrimination just for being female, and I don't like it. | |||
| :Labelling a particular guitarist as "female" is not offensive to the ''majority'' of Misplaced Pages writers. It is personally offensive to those '''female''' individuals who have sufficient ] to remain here. | |||
| :], I agree with the point that you make about the choice of the individual represented. The article calls for images of the world's greatest guitarists (regardless of gender). | |||
| :It is an interesting point that the historic illustration, the ], shows a woman playing a guitar. Small guitars were seen as a suitable instrument for women. | |||
| :Guitars became a very popular choice of instrument for fashionable women in London in the 18th century, to the detriment of the ] manufacturers. This was combatted by the harpsichord manufacturers getting a shipment of cheap guitars from Spain and handing them out to the street-sellers at ]. When the flower sellers and fish sellers were all playing guitars, they rapidly ceased to be "fashionable" and women went back to their keyboards. | |||
| :Anyway, I think I'll play Eric Clapton loud enough to get my son out of bed, (since it's nearly midday) and maybe that will sooth my ruffled feelings. | |||
| :] (]) 00:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Two of the very best and inspiring guitarists are female, Ana Vidovic and ] who is an incredible jazz guitarist and educator who I've learned much from. If you ask most people to name a female guitarist though I bet they'd be hard pushed to think of one and would probably saw something like Katie Melua, Susanna Hoffs or Courtney Love and none of them are really lead guitarists as such in the Clapton sense of the word... What stood out more here though was that Sinead o Connor was being labelled a "female guitarist" rather than by her name Sinead o Connor which probably stood out more than if it had been an anon unknown! ♦ ] 16:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Dec. 13 == | |||
| ] Please stop adding ] content. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. If you continue to do so, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> ] (]) 00:38, 18 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Pass a method, you regularly add content to pages from fringe sources or no sources. Please seriously consider taking a second look at your edits prior to making them, thank you. ] (]) 00:38, 18 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == He is stalking me too == | |||
| You know exactly who i mean. Funny, right? -- ]<sup>]</sup> 06:00, 18 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :This means that 3 people have accused him of stalking in the space of 3 days. And no, its not funny; if I catch him stalking me one more time i'm gonna do a backflip, maintain a handstand and punch myself in the belly to the point where i'm ]. ] ] 10:15, 18 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Sorry for the slow reply. Eventually cliques of editors who are just about stirring up ] won't last due to our fundamental tenant of ]. There would otherwise be no explanation as to why I am still here. :-) | |||
| I don't know anything about your editing, and I guess you managed to get yourself topic banned for 6 months about ]. When you come back I will forgive you and welcome you with open arms! -- ]<sup>]</sup> 22:43, 5 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Rob Ford == | |||
| Hi, just a point about writing lead sections of articles. Do not add the info about the 2006 council opponent in the lead section. The lead section is a summary of the article, so we don't put in details. I've added the info about the 2006 election vs. Cadigia Ali in the political career section. Cheers! ] (]) 18:37, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read ] and ] for more information. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 17:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read ] and ] for more information. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 17:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| An editor has asked for full edit protection for this article, in response to the recent back-and-forth between yourself and ]. I am inclined to protect the page accordingly, but would prefer that the two of you agree not to edit the page for a time, and instead work out your differences on the talk page, in a draft, or through an RfC. Are you willing to do this? ] ] 20:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I'll probably file an RfC ] ] 20:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :: That is a reasonable course of action. Please note that the article is now at the state that it was before the dispute began, and should stay that way until it is settled. Cheers! ] ] 20:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Resurrecting old edit wars == | |||
| I have no idea why you are resurrecting old edit wars at ], ], etc. I do wish you'd discuss things on the talk page first. And there is no reason to get into a move war either - why don't you follow ]? ]] (]) 23:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. - this has gone too far. I'm not taking sides, just trying to stop this. ] (]) 21:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| We haven't crossed paths in a long while, so I thought I would drop by and say hello. I see you have made some new friends. You might want to check out the essay ]. Cheers! ] (]) 16:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :: Welcome back to wikipedia. I admit it has been a long time. Thank you for remembering me! ] ] 18:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ===Topic ban=== | |||
| I have as supporting a topic ban against you for 6 months in all religious articles. If you have any questions about what constitutes a religious article, or a religious section of a non-religious article, you can ask myself or another uninvolved administrator.--v/r - ]] 22:47, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == A new article for you! == | |||
| I have ] created a new article: ]. Edit and change it as much as you want - I don't plan to do so. I would also encourage you to create an "Islam" section in the main article, ]. ]] (]) 20:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Fyi== | |||
| There are many other diaspora pages with red links. ] ] 19:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Good to know. By the way, thanks ]. Regards, ] (]) 19:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :: You're welcome. ] ] 19:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Paragraph == | |||
| "Wir sind immer noch nicht gut organisiert, und unsere rund tausend Mitglieder haben noch kaum militärisches Training erhalten" In english "We are not yet good enough organized, and our thousand members did not get enough military training" http://www.20min.ch/ausland/news/story/19238957 ] (]) 02:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks ] ] 10:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Redl== | |||
| Hi. Please see ] and ]. Regards, ] (]) 21:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Please note that the section is for folks that are part of the media world, not random people featured in the media. Also, per WP:NLIST ("entries must have the same importance to the subject as would be required for the entry to be included in the text of the article according to Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines (including WP:Trivia sections)"). Regards, ] (]) 21:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Extent of topic ban == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 07:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I can see that there is enough doubt about whether an article about a film relating to a religion counts as a "religious article" for there to be room for wikilawyering. However, it was made perfectly clear to you that if there was any doubt you should consult a non-involved admin. The articles ] and ] are articles that deal with religious topics, and you must have been aware of that fact. I cannot know what you had in mind when you edited those articles, but it looks remarkably like deliberate skirting round the edge of your topic ban to test how much you could get away with. If I see any editing like that again, I may block you from editing for violation of your topic ban. ] (]) 21:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| : Oh, sorry, I was somewhat unsure of the scope of topic bans, but i will try to avoid such edits in the future. Thanks. ] ] 14:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:55, 1 April 2024
- Can i help you? Just leave a message in the orthodox fashion below. Please remember to sign.
Repost of Hamza Tzortzis
A tag has been placed on Hamza Tzortzis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 
which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Tiller54 (talk) 20:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Dude wth
Where are you? MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
??? MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
 | This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pass a Method. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
|
Nomination for deletion of Template:Principal religious texts
Template:Principal religious texts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Shii (tock) 20:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Abba (Boko Haram) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abba (Boko Haram) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Abba (Boko Haram) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 03:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Non-denominational Muslim for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Non-denominational Muslim is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Non-denominational Muslim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Early scholars of Islam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Early scholars of Islam is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Early scholars of Islam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - HyperGaruda (talk) 22:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Category:Quranic figures has been nominated for discussion
Category:Quranic figures, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Al-Andalusi (talk) 01:47, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
can you help? https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Occupy_Wall_Street#Huge_section_on_Police_infiltration_is_completely_gone.21 16:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moscowamerican (talk • contribs)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Good work Vinod 06:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC) |
A page you started (Muslim denominations) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Muslim denominations, North Atlanticist Usonian!
Misplaced Pages editor Prof tpms just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Excellent classification
To reply, leave a comment on Prof tpms's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Black voting rights listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Black voting rights. Since you had some involvement with the Black voting rights redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
"Nawasib" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nawasib. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 9#Nawasib until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ParthikS8 (talk) 07:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:CPOV" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Misplaced Pages:CPOV and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 11#Misplaced Pages:CPOV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 16:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of chat websites for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of chat websites is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chat websites until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)