| Revision as of 00:05, 31 January 2014 editNyttend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators286,507 edits →January 2014: Finally someone pays attention← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:44, 16 January 2025 edit undoCremastra (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,837 edits Notification: listing of White Home at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| {{User:Nyttend/Archive box}} | {{User:Nyttend/Archive box}} | ||
| ==Deleted Article Retrieval== | |||
| == Cold weather == | |||
| Hi Nyttend, | |||
| You deleted my article: 23:13, 31 May 2024 Nyttend talk contribs deleted page Draft:Anne H. Flitcraft (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank) that I need for a class assignment and I was wondering if it was any way possible to get that article back? Or if you could possibly put it back into draft space so that I can edit it? Please let me know, thanks. | |||
| The Weather Channel is correct. It's been going on for days, so much so that it was the headline news on ] the other day. It's made worse by the ]s they have had as well. Although we are gloating we do feel kind of sorry for them. Its got to be hard when you are not used to it. ] (]) 21:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==My Hero== | |||
| == Re: "We Three Kings" == | |||
| Nyttend, | |||
| Of course I wouldn't mind! Whatever makes the most interesting hook. But thanks for asking me in advance! Cheers! —] (]) 15:09, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| All of your contributions to the various pages on the Bloomington, IN historic districts are so greatly appreciated. You're my hero. Thank you for your devotion of the preservation of memory of domestic architecture. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == re:We Three Kings == | |||
| I'm not in favour of that because it does seem a bit less hooky compared to the others. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> ''']''' (])</span> 15:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Jose Landi== | |||
| == NRHP in Cincinnati == | |||
| Can you please userfy this page for me. 11:15, 13 April 2015 Nyttend talk contribs undeleted page Jose Landi (242 revisions restored: History merge) (thank) | |||
| There is a long-standing rivalry between the east and west sides of Cincinnati. While Vine Street is generally accepted as being the dividing line (''Cincinnati Enquirer'' cartoonist ] famously likened Vine Street to the Berlin Wall ), the line is sometimes blurred. ], the location of many fine homes on the NRHP, is west of Vine Street but I wouldn't consider Clifton to be culturally a west side neighborhood. It's 'central' (or perhaps ''northern'' as the relevant section puts it, for lack of a better term). | |||
| So there's no easy answer to your proposal. But still, there are ways we can improve the current system. | |||
| Thank you | |||
| There is no "east side" or "west side" to Over-the-Rhine. It's so close to Downtown Cincinnati, that all properties located in OTR should appear in the downtown section. You could even rename that page 'NRHP in downtown Cincinnati and Over-the-Rhine' if necessary. Even better, create a separate page 'NRHP in Over-the-Rhine' listing all of the many individual properties there. | |||
| ] (]) 05:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 11#Template:NoCommons}} until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> — ] <sub>]</sub> 03:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Jarvisburg, North Carolina == | |||
| In summary, I think the system should stay mostly as it is as not to further complicate and polarize an already divided city. - ] (]) 00:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| I can't figure out how to link to deletion logs, but was going to #R this to ], but saw you G3'd in 2012 as a hoax. Guessing a redirect here is appropriate? ](]) 16:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| <!-- comment to force linebreak --> | |||
| {| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |<center>'''Your ] has been promoted'''</center> Your nomination for ] status, ''']''', gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 07:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :That would be fine. The deleted version is just a combination of copyvio and stupidity. ] (]) 22:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Reply and thx at DYK== | |||
| ::Not fine, actually, for a few reasons that I mentioned at Fiveby's talk. ] (]) 22:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi @Nyttend - thanks for the review - the hook fact is mentioned here "The Amaravati or Elliot Marbles have been compared with the beauty of the ], but unlike the Greek sculptures, the ownership of them has not been contested." with the reference . | |||
| :::Gotcha, i was just being lazy with the redirect, ]. thanks. But now need to find out if it was named for or not and if he needs an article to actually say something about the place. ](]) 00:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16#Dillaby}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Hey! == | |||
| :Could be that the hook doesn't work as it relies of readers seeing "Elliot Marbles" as similar to "Elgin Marbles". If so then we could find an alt. ] (]) 14:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Do you happen to still have access or know of a way to get access to the May 5, 2011 Liberian Heritage? It's cited in ], and I'd like to cite it in ] as well, but I'm having no luck searching for it online. Not sure the best way to get a hold of it. <span style="background-color: black">] ] ]</span> 02:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Re template W == | |||
| ==Hello to you!== | |||
| I noticed the problem you describe at ], and changed {{tl|W}} to fix the problem, temporarily at least until ] is enhanced by ], or some serious problem is encountered by having {{tl|W}} perform the same as it does on other wiki projects. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 02:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, Nyttend, | |||
| :Thank you for the note, and thank you more for the edit. I've added a comment to your statement, in hopes that it will demonstrate the chaos that results when {{tl|w}} redirects to {{tl|welcome}}, and thus in hopes that people won't put it back to being a redirect. ] (]) 03:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| It seems like years since I've run into you on the project but I just saw a comment you made on an AFD. I can see that you returned several months ago so here's a belated Welcome Back! I always valued your contributions and hope to see more of you. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 00:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Walnut Hills United Presbyterian Church == | |||
| == Classification Yards Specail Locos. == | |||
| Thanks for your article about the Walnut Hills United Presbyterian Church. (I recall how upset my father was when it was torn down.) | |||
| classification Yards section about Specail Locos was in English. Specail Locos means that they are specially designed for hump yards. ] (]) 11:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| I appreciate your effective input to Cincinnati articles, and keep it coming. | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| You have been hereby awarded the barnstar of Cincinnati.- ] (]) 07:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know|Queue_4_DYKmake_and_DYKnom_credits_are_completely_wrong:_15_minutes_to_fix|ts=15:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| ]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>] 15:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :And at ]. Thanks, ]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>] 16:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| == Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Active Pen == | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 01:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30#Misplaced Pages:Draughts}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ~ ] (] • ]) 01:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Nyttend, should I remove the resubmit template at the top of the page at ] in consideration of your submission of it on the user's behalf? ] (]) 22:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I really haven't a clue. I did this simply to ensure that it had been submitted; I'm unfamiliar with the AFC process, and for all I know, it might already have been submitted some other way. ] (]) 22:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| I created that article a few years back just like you created ] back in 2008. ''']''' (]) 20:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Cumberbatchstagedoor.jpg == | |||
| == Pennsylvania municipality pix list == | |||
| Hey, that image is under a false claim of ownership. That user who is now blocked for their edits and sock puppetry uploaded NUMEROUS images of Benedict Cumberbatch all claiming them as their own. This image needs to be deleted immediately. ] • ] 00:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| I see you haven't updated your ] list in a while. Late in the summer, I went through pretty much the whole list of 2500+ municipalities checking off if there was a Commons category, any photos, and a locator map. By checking against geo-located photos on Open Street Map and other photos since added, I basically have the updated list of municipalities like you had, good news we're down to about 157 municipalities without good or any images for their infobox. Because your list is so comprehensive and well put-together, is it alright with you if I go ahead and update your page/images? —''']''' (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 22:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| : that I used for the other uploads of this image, all of the other images that Fairyspit and the accounts they sockpuppeted have been deleted, this one got lost in the mix I guess but should be deleted. ] • ] 12:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion review for ] == | |||
| ::That was fast! You're awesome lol thank you so much! ] • ] 12:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRVNote --> —'''Matr1x-101''' <sub>('''''Ping me when replying''''')</sub> <nowiki>{</nowiki>''] ] - ]<nowiki>}</nowiki>'' 16:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Whitescarver Hall == | |||
| ==Hello Nyttend!== | |||
| You have a new message at ]. Thanks for your attention. ] (]) 19:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, I left a comment on your Wikimedia Commons profile but I see you're more active here. You uploaded this photo: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/File:Whitescarver_Hall.jpg from the Historic American Buildings Survey. This picture was taken by my late father. I didn't know he had contributed photos to HABS. Can you please tell me how you found it? ] (]) 21:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Hyphenation of a standard -ly adverb == | |||
| :I found it while going through the HABS digital archives on the Library of Congress website. ] (]) 07:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| At ] you replaced the useless hyphen after "wholly" that I had removed per ], which says "A hyphen is not used after a standard -ly adverb (a newly available home, a wholly owned subsidiary)". You also removed a full stop after "et al", which, according to something like consensus, is prescribed by AWB/Typos, and was discussed last month at ], so if you have an issue with that situation, that talk page would be a good place to bring it up. I did not change the citation style, as your edit summary indicated. The tone of the edit summary could also be improved. ] ] 17:53, 8 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I suggested that you take your complaint about "et al." to WT:AWB/T, yet you brought it to my talk page. I did not originate the rule, did not participate in the discussion about it, and I am not the only AWB user who is likely to find AWB changing "et al" to "et al." inside or outside citations. If you want something done about AWB changing punctuation in citations, then WT:AWB/T is the place to go. Your use of the "Not a typo" template to preserve "wholly-owned" is not in line with the purpose of the template; that template is not intended to enable editors to fly in the face of the MoS and instead impose their personal tastes. You do not seem receptive to any of my suggestions, but, anyway, here is one more: adopt a more cooperative attitude. ] ] 18:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| ==Once more...== | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| ...You have a new message at ]. Best, ] (]) 18:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == The ideal university article? == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| You ask hard questions! I don't know of any ideal university articles. Many such articles suffer from overly enthusiastic editing by current students, not to mention university public relations employees. One reasonably good one (based on a very superficial examination) is ] in Canada. I hope that helps! --] (]) 05:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == Question == | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 --> | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21#Marville (comics}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 21:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21#Kings (game}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 21:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Communities of Perry County, Tennessee template edits == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Question''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I would like to discuss the Misplaced Pages page concerning archaeological sites on the National Register in Indiana. Please call me Cathy Draeger-Williams at 317 234 3791 or email at cdraeger-williams@dnr.in.gov. ] (]) 19:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| Good afternoon! I see that you reverted an edit to this template to a version including a number of red links to pages that had been draftified until notability can be established. I am unsure of what you mean by your edit summary of "Redirecting communities to the county is grossly inappropriate," as it appears as though all you did was restore a number of red links. Could you please further explain what you were trying to do? Thanks! ] (]) 19:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI problem == | |||
| :: They might not be notable, though. I added these places after I found them in the GNIS, but before I discovered the rule that simply existing in GNIS isn't enough for geographic places. Based on that, I took the articles that I created that I was having trouble finding additional sources or evidence of notability of, draftified then until I could do more research, and removed the entries I had created from the template. I didn't just go deleting redlinks, I deleted redlinks that I had added myself on a mistaken interpretation of the rules, then corrected when I realized my error. Either way, I'm still not sure what you were talking about with the redirecting comment, as none were redirects to the county.] (]) 01:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I have just placed a nowiki note around some sample text you placed on this board as it was suppressing the remainder of the page. However it has replaced four tildes you used to sign with my signature not yours. I have removed my signature with an edit summary but would invite you to replace your signature in the text. My intention was only to nowiki your sample text and I have no idea why anything else happened. Sorry. ] (]) 22:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 01:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Nyttend, please correct this error == | |||
| Yes, thanks for that, I thought it might be a glitch somewhere. Going to bed now. ] (]) 22:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Nyttend, You created an entry for the historic home in Henrico named Edge Hill - https://en.wikipedia.org/Edge_Hill_(Richmond,_Virginia). You describe the accompanying photo as Front of Edge Hill but the street side view is the back. The south-facing front is magnificent and cannot be seen from Greenview Drive. This error would not matter but that the front of the house is significant to it's historic designation, please correct the text for your photo. ] (]) 11:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Walnut Hills United Presbyterian Church== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that preservationists saved the tower of the ''']''' ''(pictured)'' even though the rest of the building was demolished?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Partial blocks == | ||
| Per your question at ANI, I'll try to answer. | |||
| Do you think he's notable for an article? | |||
| ] (]) 01:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| * Oops. I meant Ray '''N'''ance. He's talked about here: ] ] (]) 02:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| You can block editors from specific pages, in whatever namespace, or from entire namespaces. This is often useful in stopping edit warriors, as it's less drastic than a siteblock, and allows them to make their case on the article talkpage, for instance. You can block from multiple pages in different namespaces. | |||
| ==Roman Myth Templates== | |||
| Namespace blocks can be useful for dealing with an editor who is to focused on WP space pot-stirring. . . Someone who is less than competent with templates might need a template space block. I've also used it for editors who are polite and communicative, but who have chronic sourcing issues in article space. | |||
| It was like 2005, I had no idea how to do wiki markup and was most likely drinking heavily at the time. :-) ] (]) 04:41, 10 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Do what thou wilt etc. If we're still using those templates I hope someone merges or deletes them for something better soon. Thanks for checking in though. 15:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| It can be extremely useful where you might otherwise have to place an overly large IP rangeblock - you can deal with a focused problem IP range by blocking the individual articles or editors they've focused on. Harassment IPs are often dealt with that way. | |||
| ==DYK for Elias Kumler House== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the ''']''' was restored after being condemned as a structural hazard?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> — ] (]) 08:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| I wasn't keen on it at first, and there are still many times when someone just needs a siteblock. But it's a little gentler than a siteblock for editors whose problems can be isolated to a few locations, or where you want to preserve access to most of the 'pedia from a big range.. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| See ]. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 21:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, could you my comment, please? ''']''' <sup>'''] / ]</sup>''' 12:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==Copycat?== | |||
| An unregistered user uses "Nytten" for his name. See https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Nytten. I'll leave it up to you whether he is a future major contributor but he has held off sufficiently long from registering. ] (]) 17:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, just checking why you reverted my edit? ] (]) 20:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Folk Mataraman Institute == | |||
| ==Belated Welcome back! == | |||
| You know that "Folk Mataraman Institute" is a band and they are pasting their spam all over the Internet? It's also and obvious cut and paste job because their paste stopped in at the beginning of a word. --] (]) 04:24, 12 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, Nyttend, | |||
| I just saw your message an AN and I must say that I noticed your absence over the years but I hadn't noticed that you had returned and got your mop back. You were missed! We are short-handed in several admin areas on the project so, however you wish to contribute, your presence is very welcome. I myself took two years off, from 2016-2018 while I dealt with issues in my off-line life and I was glad I took a break. I hope you still find the work here satisfying. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask one of the old-timers. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 04:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :I see I already posted a belated welcome back in 2023, so just consider this a reprise! <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 04:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Nyttend. I've asked a question regarding this DYK nomination at ]. Regards, ] (]) 09:57, 12 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == CSD removals == | |||
| ==DYK for St. Henry's Catholic Church (Harriettsville, Ohio)== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that ''']''' is the only stone building in ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 01:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I'm not sure why you have removed the CSD tags from these articles. They're quite clearly hoaxes which means G3 is applicable. ] (]) 23:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Annajamesphoto.png == | |||
| Favor - this file was uploaded by ] also claiming ownership. Saying he's the guy in the photo but clearly he isn't because if that were the case he would also be the girl that took the photo of Cumberbatch in the previously mentioned photos. Wondering if you could look into that getting deleted too. Thanks <small>] • ]</small> 15:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==DYK for Brumback Library== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that Ohio's ''']''' ''(pictured)'' was the first county library in the United States?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> — ] (]) 03:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC) 16:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Hello Nyttend, could you please explain to me why you arbitrarily deleted Middlesex Record Office from the disambiguation page? In my opinion, the encyclopedic relevance is clearly given due to the presence of the article about the successor organization. ] (]) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|Lady Lotus|ts=20:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| <small>] • ]</small> 20:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Removal of CSD == | ||
| Hi Nyttend, | |||
| Hello, Nyttend. ] (aka trespassers william) wasn't trying to withdraw his nomination of ] at AfD, he just appears to have run afoul of some technicalities. He says so on his where I asked him what he intended. I'd like to try and salvage the article. I will oppose deletion. What I would like to ask you is: how much longer does the AfD have to run before a decision is made? Thanks for your help! --] (]) 21:49, 13 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| I had requested a deletion of redirect ] to make way for AFC move of the draft article ]. The article cannot be reviewed or approved without actually deleting the redirect page. Can you kindly delete it? Cheers. ] (]) 07:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Please see ] == | ||
| Hi Nyttend, I just made to bring the ], article in line with ]: | |||
| <redacted> looks like a major mistake by a new user. I doubt they wanted to post their cell phone number like that. Should this be deleted? It doesn't meet any CSD criteria that I can find. Thanks. (If this conversation disappears along with it, I'll understand why.) --<span style="outline:1px dotted #d1bfa4;"><font color="#ffffff">|</font> ] | ] <font color="#ffffff">|</font></span> 23:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Redacting the link, but there's no need to destroy the whole thing. I've deleted the page and will attempt to delete the log entry, although I'm not sure that I'll do the right thing. I'll ask for outside input if I make a mistake. ] (]) 23:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::That's probably something you should send to oversight, Nyttend; they know how to nuke things like that. ] ]] 23:10, 13 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::I thought of that, but I wasn't sure because this was self-revelation of information. However, since you're suggesting it, I know it's not a crazy idea, so I'll ask them. ] (]) 23:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{cross}} ], ], ] (<code><nowiki>], ], ]</nowiki></code>) | |||
| == Ban of user 75.104.131.93 == | |||
| {{tick}} ], United States (<code><nowiki>], United States</nowiki></code>) | |||
| I am on a dynamic IP system, that address has been reassigned, and I created a user account. However, I do not wish to be in violation of the rules. Please lift the ban and I pledge to follow the rules in my quest to see that unnecessary German language translations are removed from English language Misplaced Pages scientific concept articles.] (]) 19:27, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| I happened to take a look at the history of the article and noticed that you have been recently working on this and some related articles. It would be great if you could also help to fix some of the overlinking in these articles, in line with ]. Thanks! —] (]) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Just FYI... == | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Your close of the IPBE thread on AN changed the section header for some reason; I've changed it back. Not sure how that happened. ] ]] 22:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>'''Not required due to ]. Articles now appear separately at ], and both link to each other.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|Template:Did you know nominations/Fenwick Club|ts=23:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==DYK nomination of Fenwick Club== | |||
| ] Hello! Your submission of ] at the ] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath ''']''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> ] (]) 23:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC) ] (]) 23:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == Note about unblock == | |||
| *'''' | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span class="nowrap"> — ] (]</span> 07:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. As you've unblocked at your discretion, I've nothing to say on that, and am happy to leave that at your discretion (of course presuming you're an uninvolved admin, something I haven't and probably won't investigate at this time). This is merely for future reference. | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24#Cunty}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 15:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| | name = First Edit Day | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue); | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Nyttend! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 07:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site Picture - precision location? == | |||
| While I know it isn't required, it would have been appreciated if you had dropped a note on my talk page that you were going to reverse an admin action. (See also ] and ].) | |||
| Hi Nyttend! You have an original picture attached to the ] article ] . In the description, you have it located 'off Miller Road' at 37° 06′ 14″ N, 76° 33′ 07″ W. Based on the NRHP nomination documentation, https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/VLR_to_transfer/PDFNoms/121-0037_First_Denbigh_Church_AE_Site_1982_Final_Nomination.pdf, the location was cited as being nearest 18 Walters Road, about 4500ft south, at the next creek convergence. Language in the NRHP doc described 15 feet out of 50 of the church having being lost to erosion before rip rap was added, implying it was right on the river. The Newport News property records at https://assessment.nnva.gov/PT/datalets/datalet.aspx?mode=sales&UseSearch=no&pin=178000121&jur=700&taxyr=2025&LMparent=20 also match the NRHP assertion of a Donald Shenk owning the land at the time of the 1981/2 submission. Before I update, do you happen to have a different source or personal knowledge that would put the location that 0.85 miles north, near Miller Road? | |||
| And as for the location (the talk page), I would point you to ], which very clearly uses the word "discussions" in its example, and even uses the words: '''''"...and their talk pages."''''' If you feel that TBAN is too vaguely worded, or that you feel I am misinterpreting what is (in my estimation) laid out fairly clearly there, I welcome discussion. | |||
| ] (]) 18:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Saw your message, no rush, thank you - I'll try to remember to circle back in a few months. | |||
| Regardless, as I said this is merely for future reference. | |||
| :] (]) 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==New message from LR.127== | |||
| Happy editing : ) - <b>]</b> 06:36, 16 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{talkback|User talk:LR.127|Lots of AFC/R declines|ts=12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
| ] (]) 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| ::Thanks for the note. It's been a long long time since I had any kind of interaction with Bugs or Medeis (I vaguely remember sending TRM a note not long ago), and the last substantial thing I remember saying to Bugs (year or two ago?) was basically "this is your last warning for personal attacks", rather than something that would bias me in his favor. I'm sorry that I didn't notify you as expected; I'd just assumed that you would quickly learn from my note at the WP:AN thread, since you'd started it as a request for input on the situation. No disagreement with your interpretation of WP:TBAN; I was attempting to say that this is a thoroughly different situation. The proposal that you closed as "yes" wasn't at all written as a topic ban from discussing Misplaced Pages reference desks — the wording indicates a desire to keep them off the desk, a page ban that just got misnamed. This is thus different from a topic ban on weather, which prohibits people from discussing weather on talk pages or non-meteorological articles. ] (]) 06:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thank you for your comments. | |||
| :::And my apologies, I wasn't suggesting you were biased (though I suppose I can see how that could have been interpreted that way), I was merely trying to be thorough in my comment of "leaving it to your discretion". | |||
| :::I went to AN last, after reading my talk page and checking on the status of the block (in case comment was required). I saw that you had unblocked and left you this note above. | |||
| :::And on your point about topic ban vs page ban. I think you've a valid point there. What was being discussed was banning the editors from the '''''pages''''' related to the reference desk, rather than the '''''topic''''' of the reference desk. But just as the proposer apparently overlooked that fine point, so did the closer. (As an aside, I think it's fair to say that in[REDACTED] parlance shorthand, it's not uncommon to see someone use the phrase "topic ban" when they mean "page ban". But that's little excuse : ) | |||
| :::Under normal circumstances, I'd immediately go and clarify the closure (and note it to those affected), but with the 3PO underway, with more than a few questioning the closure itself, I think I'll wait a bit for more input. - <b>]</b> 07:29, 16 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::<complicated>Actually, I didn't think you thought I was biased</complicated>; I thought you were basically trying to say "I'm AGF-ing", and I was basically trying to say "You're right, and here's side information in case you care". No need to apologise. I can understand the situation of (<normally would clarify> and <won't now due to contention>); it just seemed that your initial closing statement was all you were planning to say by yourself (i.e. you hadn't left anything out; any modifications would represent a change of mind), so I expected that you meant to say (and were intending to continue saying) that he was restricted specifically from editing the Reference Desk, and then decided by yourself later that the ban ought to go farther than that, doing it of your own accord and not simply because your interpretation of the discussion had changed. Of course I fully understand that you couldn't respond to all of the comments at WP:AN, since they were coming rather fast and quickly together, so I wasn't thinking you were ignoring people's comments. Way past bedtime for me; it's almost 3AM, and I have work at 9AM, so please don't expect any more responses for quite a while. ] (]) 07:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| ==DYK for Old College Hill Post Office== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the ''']''' in ], ], was converted into a house after closing in 1892?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> — ] (]) 16:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| == Valley View DYK == | |||
| Good morning Nyttend, I know it would be a bit of an inconvenience, but would it be possible to pull ] from the Prep 2 queue and return it to the nominations page? I'm still working to locate an image for the hook, and forgot to note this on the article's nomination template. If this is possible, I'd greatly appreciate it, and I apologize for the trouble. I'll cross post this request with other DYK administrators. Thanks again! -- ] (]) 10:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| == Response == | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| Hi. I responded on my talk page to the query you posted there. --] (]) 20:32, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I've responded again -- and even wrote an article about ]. --] (]) 23:42, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| == Rajpurohit == | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| Thank you for handling the Rajpurohit article and for providing clarification on the ANI thread. I had read the 3RR exceptions but I had missed the copyright violation one. I apologize for taking so long to bring up the issue and will handle any copyvio issues more proptly in the future. Thanks again. ''''']]]''''' 03:06, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Archaeology == | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| Sorry to hear that the ''Tennessee Anthropologist'' no longer exists, they kindly let me put copies of some articles on the Bat Creek nonsense on my website. ] (]) 21:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
| == Hurricane Kristy (2024) == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I saw that two days ago you had overruled my decline of ] and moved it into mainspace anyway. There was an active discussion as to whether Category 5 hurricanes warrant notability, and the article will now most likely be merged. Why did you move it? ]]<small></small> 17:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Nyttend, I wanted to let you know that your concerns here appear to have been addressed. Will you be continuing the review, or should I call for another reviewer. Please let me know if the latter. (If the former, I'll see your post there.) Many thanks! ] (]) 16:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Since you said you were curious about CTOP == | |||
| ==DYK nomination of Fenwick Club== | |||
| ] Hello! Your submission of ] at the ] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath ''']''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> ] (]) 04:25, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Since you ] that you weren't familiar with the CTOP protection enforcements and were curious - if enforcing a protection of a page as part of ] - there's a logging procedure outlined at ] to log said protection at the relevant subsection in the log, such as ] for enforcing an AMPOL protection so a history of such protections is centralized, for example to say be able to see how often a certain arbitration enforcement had to be enacted each year. | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| As I'm editing fairly frequently on various CTOP articles and counter vandalism patrol, I've encountered my fair share of it, so I've become fairly familiar with the theoretical aspect of it to seek help from admins on it to help enforcement as necessary :) | |||
| It's up to the admins discretion, but given the vandalism appeared clearly politically motivated, I would have considered it to fall under the AMPOL CTOP, which is why I suggested logging it, but it's up to you as the admin that imposed it of course :) ] (]) 04:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| Hey. I know I already thanked you for making me a template editor, but just wanted to say I really appreciate it. I had been considering asking for it myself but was afraid I wouldn't qualify based on the guidelines. Not all Wikipedians would be as cordial. I think I'll find it very useful. ] (]) 05:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| ==DYK for Henry Powell House== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the ''']''' was renovated to change its architectural style from ] to ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| == A note on the missing listings == | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| Since I noticed you've been adding those missing listings to the county lists, don't forget to update the counts at the state and national lists too. I took care of the Connecticut and Michigan listings already, so don't worry about those. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 03:11, 22 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Ah, I didn't realize you were doing it that way. That makes sense. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 03:20, 22 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == January 2014 == | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on . | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| *<nowiki>]n Movements architecture</nowiki>{{red|''']]'''}}<nowiki></nowiki> | |||
| Thanks, <!-- (0, -2, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 04:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Island, Kentucky == | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| I noticed you added a photo of ] that you made yourself. I hope someone told you to visit the Dairy Freeze while you were there. Awesome cheeseburgers, and the only place around here that you can get deep-fried cheddar cheese balls! ] <sup><span class="plainlinks">(] '''·''' ])</span></sup> 14:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
| :Bummer that you weren't through at the right time to get a good cheeseburger. The Dairy Freeze does have breakfast, but I've never had it there. If you ever happen to be through there again, give it a go. I know how those long drives are, though. I have to do a round trip between my home and ] (about 320 miles, total), for work sometimes. Plus, you lose an hour from crossing time zones on the way. Not much that can entice you to stop and make the trip even longer. Were you able to find the Robert Thomas House? ] <sup><span class="plainlinks">(] '''·''' ])</span></sup> 19:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ::Lotta history in Russellville. Bet you got some good shots there. Let me know when you get them uploaded. I went there on a picture-taking mission once, but I hadn't done proper research before I went, so I only got a few of the important sites. Bowling Green would be another good place to go. Wish I'd been active on Misplaced Pages when I was in grad school at ]; probably could have saved you the trip! I know what you mean about the cold weather. It was a balmy 8 degrees when I got to work this morning. Brr. ] <sup><span class="plainlinks">(] '''·''' ])</span></sup> 19:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 15#Fishers Island, New York (old edit history)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> Regards, ]] 05:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| ==DYK for Fenwick Club== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that Cincinnati's ''']''' was established as a Catholic alternative to the YMCA?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> — ] (]) 16:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == Complete history merge == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| I see you merged those histories. Could you merge histories of talk pages ] and ] as well? Thanks. '']''<sup> ] ]</sup> 01:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :No. Let me explain why; it's a technical reason, not some petty refusal on my part. All of the edits I moved to ] were originally at ] — I deleted both pages, restored the aeromobil edits that I was going to merge, moved them to Klein, and restored the deleted Klein edits. I was originally going to move everything from aeromobil to Klein, and my decision to leave a few behind was intentional. This is because the timestamps overlapped, and as ] says, histmerging some overlapping stuff would produce severe confusion. Let me demonstrate the result by pointing you to a few pages: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| :I created pages 1 and 4 with the original chunk from ] and created pages 2 and 3 with identical text from ]. I then proceeded to make a few edits to each page, being careful to make the same edit to each pair: I cut the "Preservation" section from each article, and then I cut everything below References. I did nothing more to 3 and 4, while I then performed a complete history merge by moving 1 and 2 to page 5. You can easily see my editing patterns by looking at the histories for pages 3 and 4: everything proceeds in a nice linear fashion, e.g. . However, all the diffs in the history of page 5 are gibberish. Look at , for example: my edit summary was "Cutting a chunk", but it looks as if I completely replaced one page with another, and "cutting a chunk" resulted in the article actually gaining 776 characters. '''My point''' Any time you have pages with overlapping timestamps, a histmerge is catastrophic. Histmerges are only ever safe when all of the edits at page 1 were made before any of the edits at page 2 were made. ] (]) 01:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK, I get your point. But sadly, we're losing when DYK was confirmed this way... In my opinion user who renamed Draft:Aeromobil to Klein Aeromobil did it pretty hasty and inappropriately. He should've first merge it with already existent page Aeromobil (at that time tagged with some copyvio tag) and only then rename it at will. (But I still don't see any valid reason for such a rename, as only fewer people will be directed to the desired page.) PS Can I ask you something via email, because I find it somehow private? Cheers, '']''<sup> ] ]</sup> 01:47, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::Actually we've not lost any revisions; every revision is visible (i.e. there are no deleted edits in any of the page histories), and displayed when it first appeared at DYK. Or are you asking me to merge the talk page histories as well? I'd advise against that: when articles get histmerged, we normally don't move their talk pages. I don't understand why you think the rename was inappropriate or unhelpful: the Draft namespace is only for pages that aren't ready to be articles yet, so if I remember rightly, they're ] and thus difficult to find with search engines, but pages in mainspace can easily be found by Google within a few minutes of their creation. Finally, send your email. ] (]) 01:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Done. Check your inbox. '']''<sup> ] ]</sup> 03:19, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Talkback|Aleksa Lukic}} | |||
| :PS If you don't want to leave me your email, you can create a free account on Yahoo or similar site, it's copletely free and anyone can do it, and then you can send me mail anonymously. Regards, '']''<sup> ] ]</sup> 17:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ==Nuclear testing: India, Pakistan and North Korea== | |||
| </div> | |||
| The page that you edited (]) was initially created, by me, in order to hold atomic testing history for those three countries. A few days later I decided it would be best if the data were on three different pages. Someone came along and placed links top those three pages there. I was looking for a way to delete it (I fairly new to file level editing in wiki), and along came another editor who put it under quick-delete. I placed a message on the QD page saying that was perfectly alright with me, then along you come and delete the link top the comments page as well as the quick-delete header. It is not a disambiguation page; it was merely a page with three useless links on it - useless because the reason for the page is gone, and it is an orphan besides. So, why don't you just delete the page and its talk, and we'll all be happy? ] (]) 06:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| ==Your assistance please== | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| THis ANI is driving me crazy. i can't even begin to do the edits I've been wanting to do, because i'm so caught up in this. All i know is that i'm being accused of Gaming the IBAN with Chris. And no one other than Verso.Sciolto aren't providing reason at all. And i just want it to end so i can continue editing. I don't understand how my involvement with ] has to do with gaming the article. And I've asked time and time again there reasoning, and i've provided a summary plus reasoning....this is exhausting and no one, not the ones casting their votes have provided enough reason. So all i ask is that if someone can clarify where exactly i'm gaming the system by taking advantage of the IBAN? | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Keep in mind, i'm not asking you to support me, to oppose me in the current AN discussion, all i ask...is to explain to me where these editors are coming from.] (]) 11:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :First off, please note that I didn't check any of the diffs/links when I left my comments early in the discussion; I was simply asking if you'd done anything worthy of immediate sanctions, and since you hadn't, I was saying "I'm not going to pass judgement". More comments as I do a bit of reading. ] (]) 14:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::I can't draw anything useful from the discussion — it's so long and burdened with so much side discussion that it really can't be the basis of anything useful. With that in mind, I've emailed Salvidrim! with a procedural proposal; should he agree, I'll perform it, and should he disagree, I'll come back to trying to help with the current discussion. ] (]) 15:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::As you'll probably see before you read this comment, I've closed everything in the discussion except for the proposal. I just couldn't imagine anything concrete happening from the original thread and its numerous tangents, ''except'' for the proposal that you be indefinitely blocked. Since this has a specific goal, I expect it will have a solid result, regardless of whether you end up blocked or whether the block idea is rejected. It's my hope that this will make things far simpler for everyone, including you, and give you a "speedy trial". If I can help in any other procedural matter, or if you want my outside input, let me know and I'll try to help. ] (]) 04:06, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Fair enough but i'm afraid a lot of points have been ignored by just casting a vote. And as you can see, most editors will be voting out of irritation of me being part of this ANI rather than me actually being disruptive.] (]) 04:12, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::To respond to your initial question, I simply don't understand where people are coming from. I don't understand where you're coming from. I don't really understand ''anything'' of this dispute, and the massive discussion didn't help at all. That's why I closed it and immediately reopened the proposal at the end: it was the only thing that could end in you getting sanctions, and it was the only thing that could end in you getting no sanctions. It was the only thing that could end in anything at all! Also please note that I'm not attempting to make this anything more of a vote than normal votes: yes, people are offering input in a "support"/"oppose" type of format, but things like Salvidrim's "Support, Oppose and Neutral" are accepted, and we're going to pay attention to comments made with the votes. ] (]) 05:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 22:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Naming conventions== | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| I have looked at the page of the Misplaced Pages project, and at the website of NRHP. I searched "St. Michael's Catholic Church (Cedar Hill, Tennessee)" on that site, and it immediately corrected it to St Michael's Catholic Church, Cedar Hill, Tennessee". | |||
| ] | |||
| Whoever established the naming convention on the Misplaced Pages site in the first place was ignorant of (or simply ignored or didn't bother to check) the normal, worldwide convention in naming places (particularly state buildings and churches). | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 16#White Home}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="font:14px Gill Sans;">'']'' (] — ])</span> 00:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| It remains incorrect, regardless of some early decision on Misplaced Pages. Establishing inappropriate forms and styles and then maintaining them happens quite a lot here. And when it happens, it is to the discredit of the encyclopedia. ] (]) 23:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I searched for "St. Michael's Catholic Church (Cedar Hill, Tennessee)", fully expecting because of the information that you gave, that this would find a page ''with that name''. It didn't. Moreover, it didn't bring up any article on the church itself. It corrected my search to "St Michael's Catholic Church, Cedar Hill, Tennessee". | |||
| :In other words "St. Michael's Catholic Church (Cedar Hill, Tennessee)" doesn't work on the NRHP website, and therefore the format should be discontinued on Misplaced Pages. If the Misplaced Pages article on NRHP promotes this use, then that needs fixing. Someone needs to go through every US church article on Misplaced Pages and put this inappropriate format to rights. | |||
| :As I have said before, the location of a building is part of its identity, particularly in the case of a church. It needs fixing. | |||
| :] (]) 01:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Nyttend, what I am telling you is: this is a stupid and inappropriate naming convention that does not comply with real-world usage, encyclopedic usage or the way in which churches are listed in the relevant government documents or those of heritage bodies. | |||
| ::Whoever established this on Misplaced Pages got it wrong in the first place, and it needs to be brought into line. Churches are generally known by the name of their location, along with their saints name. In the case of cathedrals, they are generally just known by their location, unless there are two cathedrals in the town. | |||
| ::You cannot over-ride common sense, common usage and common knowledge with some foolish[REDACTED] convention that wasn't thought through in the first place, and is now being badly misapplied. Look up a few church websites, find some that include the location, and see how it is done. | |||
| ::I have checked a couple of state capitol buildings and notice ], not ] although both get a result. This example, however, shows how ridiculous the convention is, when misapplied. Churches belong to their location, in the same way as the Texas State Capitol belongs, quite exclusively, to its state. This is the correct way to do it, in the case of every church. | |||
| ::] (]) 04:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::Please go and talk about it on the article's talk page. I don't want a conversation on four pages. ] (]) 04:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Advice on ] == | |||
| Hi Nyttend, I came across this article a little while ago when patrolling recent changes. To me it looks like someone's sandbox. I reverted to what look like the last plausible version, but a new user and IP (possibly the same individual) wants me to wait for them to source it, but in addition to the horrible formatting, it is not close to encyclopedic. What should be done? Thanks. --] (]) 05:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| *I just saw your solution, which is great! --] (]) 06:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==January 2014== | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ] without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] 17:21, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Have you done something to the page? I'm trying to revert your making it into a redirect but keep getting an error message.] 17:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've done nothing to the page except for redirecting it. The page has never had substantial coverage in secondary sources, and the AFD was kept because of the interference of sockpuppets. Please do not continue to restore it, and it would be appreciated if you didn't ]. ] (]) 17:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::You made a page into a redirect and started a AFD without an explanation. The template was deserved. As for redirecting the article, it has been opposed by multiple editors. Your administrative functions don't give you the right to do what you did. Start a proper AFD if you want.] 17:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::The page is reverted and the AFD tag removed and I'm not a sockpuppet. Your statement 'Please do not continue to restore it' is in clear conflict with ] but you're an administrator and this is just another case of an administrator not thinking rules apply to them.] 20:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Your series of unfounded accusations is the reason for the warning on your talk page. WP:BRD does not apply to spam, and meanwhile I never accused you of sockpuppetry. Just try reading the top of the original AFD before attacking me for things that I didn't say. ] (]) 22:16, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Unfounded? You have redirected for no reason and when somebody reverted it you vioalated it(and your spam excuse is bs and was never mentioned) started an AFD with no reason for starting it. You're an experienced editor and administrator. Your AFD was incompetent. Take me to ANI.] 22:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::You nominated the page for deletion here with a blank AFD page. Then you actually came back and edited it again and neither time did you give an explanation. You made the page a redirect without explanation. Then after someone reverted the redirect you did it again in violation of BRD. When yet another editor calls you on it, you further declare intent to violate BRD or that you ] that page. You're the editor who should be blocked but that doesn't ever happen to administrators around here.] 23:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::William: Another user but failed to tag the article. All that Nyttend did was finish up the process that the other user had started. Your persistence on attacking an administrator for taking care of some of the grunt work required for the basic administration of Misplaced Pages is making you look bad. --] (]) 01:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC | |||
| ::::::::You don't be absurd. Nyttend was the one who nominated the page for deletion here without giving a reason. He even made a second edit] and still couldn't explain himself. Ignoring those edits tells me again Misplaced Pages administrators first job here to protect your own.] 01:18, 30 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::I stand corrected on the history. My apologies. But you still should know that your behavior toward him has been inconsistent with the civility that is necessary if Misplaced Pages is to survive. --] (]) 01:55, 30 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::William, that is not what happened. Nyttend was going to send it to AfD, but changed his mind and created a redirect. You reverted Nyttend, sent it to AfD and then you closed it. And then someone sent an email that started off wiki attack on Nyttend at (go to publications). Apparently, Wirtland does discriminate based on religious and political views. ] (]) 01:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::Finally, someone comes along to investigate the history while paying attention: you assess the situation correctly. I've been trying and trying and trying to get William to look at the history, but every time I say that I didn't make a bad deletion nomination, William repeats his accusations. When I observe that WP:SOCK violations have been responsible for this article's continued existence, William takes it as an accusation against him, saying "I'm not a sockpuppet". Turning to the broader issue: when someone from their PR department is still monitoring this article so closely, and when they're openly advocating for its preservation, why should we trust that ''anyone'' who edits this article is doing so in good faith, unless they're an established editor? Obviously William's established, but the same is not true of User:Remux (who created the AFD), and there's no good reason to see his edits as a good-faith objection to the redirection. <small>I need to note that the wirtland.blogspot.com hit piece does catch one thing incorrect that I've said — I'm not in graduate school anymore, because I finished up my programs and got my degrees last year.</small> ] (]) 00:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:44, 16 January 2025
| "You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you. |
|---|
 Talk page archives Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3 Archive 4 • Archive 5 • Archive 6 Archive 7 • Archive 8 • Archive 9 Archive 10 • Archive 11 • Archive 12 Archive 13 • Archive 14 • Archive 15 Archive 16 • Archive 17 • Archive 18 Archive 19 • Archive 20 • Archive 21 Archive 22 • Archive 23 • Archive 24 Archive 25 • Archive 26 • Archive 27 Archive 28 • Archive 29 • Archive 30 Archive 31 • Archive 32 • Archive 33 Archive 34 • Archive 35 • Archive 36 Archive 37 • Archive 38 • Archive 39 Archive 40 • Archive 41 • Archive 42 Archive 43 • Archive 44 • Archive 45 Archive 46 • Archive 47 • Archive 48 Archive 49 • Archive 50 • Archive 51 Archive 52 • Archive 53 • Archive 54 |
Deleted Article Retrieval
Hi Nyttend,
You deleted my article: 23:13, 31 May 2024 Nyttend talk contribs deleted page Draft:Anne H. Flitcraft (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank) that I need for a class assignment and I was wondering if it was any way possible to get that article back? Or if you could possibly put it back into draft space so that I can edit it? Please let me know, thanks.
My Hero
Nyttend,
All of your contributions to the various pages on the Bloomington, IN historic districts are so greatly appreciated. You're my hero. Thank you for your devotion of the preservation of memory of domestic architecture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felychko1991 (talk • contribs) 06:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Jose Landi
Can you please userfy this page for me. 11:15, 13 April 2015 Nyttend talk contribs undeleted page Jose Landi (242 revisions restored: History merge) (thank)
Thank you
BlackAmerican (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
"Template:NoCommons" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Template:NoCommons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 11 § Template:NoCommons until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Jarvisburg, North Carolina
I can't figure out how to link to deletion logs, but was going to #R this to Currituck County, North Carolina#Communities, but saw you G3'd in 2012 as a hoax. Guessing a redirect here is appropriate? fiveby(zero) 16:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- That would be fine. The deleted version is just a combination of copyvio and stupidity. Courcelles (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not fine, actually, for a few reasons that I mentioned at Fiveby's talk. Nyttend (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Gotcha, i was just being lazy with the redirect, stubbed. thanks. But now need to find out if it was named for this guy or not and if he needs an article to actually say something about the place. fiveby(zero) 00:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not fine, actually, for a few reasons that I mentioned at Fiveby's talk. Nyttend (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
"Dillaby" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Dillaby has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16 § Dillaby until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 21:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Hey!
Do you happen to still have access or know of a way to get access to the May 5, 2011 Liberian Heritage? It's cited in Edward Kesselly, and I'd like to cite it in Quardu Gboni District as well, but I'm having no luck searching for it online. Not sure the best way to get a hold of it. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello to you!
Hi, Nyttend,
It seems like years since I've run into you on the project but I just saw a comment you made on an AFD. I can see that you returned several months ago so here's a belated Welcome Back! I always valued your contributions and hope to see more of you. Liz 00:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Classification Yards Specail Locos.
classification Yards section about Specail Locos was in English. Specail Locos means that they are specially designed for hump yards. I Like The british Rail Class 483 (talk) 11:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Horse Creek, Wyoming for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horse Creek, Wyoming is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Horse Creek, Wyoming until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe (talk) 01:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:Draughts" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Misplaced Pages:Draughts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § Misplaced Pages:Draughts until a consensus is reached. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 01:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Chaceley
I created that article a few years back just like you created Chaseley, North Dakota back in 2008. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Pennsylvania municipality pix list
I see you haven't updated your User:Nyttend/Pennsylvania list in a while. Late in the summer, I went through pretty much the whole list of 2500+ municipalities checking off if there was a Commons category, any photos, and a locator map. By checking against geo-located photos on Open Street Map and other photos since added, I basically have the updated list of municipalities like you had, good news we're down to about 157 municipalities without good or any images for their infobox. Because your list is so comprehensive and well put-together, is it alright with you if I go ahead and update your page/images? —Mr. Matté (/Contrib) 22:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deletion review for File:The sun1.jpg
An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:The sun1.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) {user page - talk} 16:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Whitescarver Hall
Hello, I left a comment on your Wikimedia Commons profile but I see you're more active here. You uploaded this photo: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/File:Whitescarver_Hall.jpg from the Historic American Buildings Survey. This picture was taken by my late father. I didn't know he had contributed photos to HABS. Can you please tell me how you found it? Perodicticus (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- I found it while going through the HABS digital archives on the Library of Congress website. Nyttend (talk) 07:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
"Marville (comics" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Marville (comics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Marville (comics until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
"Kings (game" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Kings (game has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Kings (game until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Communities of Perry County, Tennessee template edits
Good afternoon! I see that you reverted an edit to this template to a version including a number of red links to pages that had been draftified until notability can be established. I am unsure of what you mean by your edit summary of "Redirecting communities to the county is grossly inappropriate," as it appears as though all you did was restore a number of red links. Could you please further explain what you were trying to do? Thanks! nf utvol (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- They might not be notable, though. I added these places after I found them in the GNIS, but before I discovered the rule that simply existing in GNIS isn't enough for geographic places. Based on that, I took the articles that I created that I was having trouble finding additional sources or evidence of notability of, draftified then until I could do more research, and removed the entries I had created from the template. I didn't just go deleting redlinks, I deleted redlinks that I had added myself on a mistaken interpretation of the rules, then corrected when I realized my error. Either way, I'm still not sure what you were talking about with the redirecting comment, as none were redirects to the county.nf utvol (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
"Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Alignment (Dungeons & Dragons until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Nyttend, please correct this error
Nyttend, You created an entry for the historic home in Henrico named Edge Hill - https://en.wikipedia.org/Edge_Hill_(Richmond,_Virginia). You describe the accompanying photo as Front of Edge Hill but the street side view is the back. The south-facing front is magnificent and cannot be seen from Greenview Drive. This error would not matter but that the front of the house is significant to it's historic designation, please correct the text for your photo. Kwhopson (talk) 11:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Partial blocks
Per your question at ANI, I'll try to answer.
You can block editors from specific pages, in whatever namespace, or from entire namespaces. This is often useful in stopping edit warriors, as it's less drastic than a siteblock, and allows them to make their case on the article talkpage, for instance. You can block from multiple pages in different namespaces.
Namespace blocks can be useful for dealing with an editor who is to focused on WP space pot-stirring. . . Someone who is less than competent with templates might need a template space block. I've also used it for editors who are polite and communicative, but who have chronic sourcing issues in article space.
It can be extremely useful where you might otherwise have to place an overly large IP rangeblock - you can deal with a focused problem IP range by blocking the individual articles or editors they've focused on. Harassment IPs are often dealt with that way.
I wasn't keen on it at first, and there are still many times when someone just needs a siteblock. But it's a little gentler than a siteblock for editors whose problems can be isolated to a few locations, or where you want to preserve access to most of the 'pedia from a big range..
See WP:PBLOCK. Acroterion (talk) 21:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Art jewelry
Hi, just checking why you reverted my edit? Equine-man (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Belated Welcome back!
Hello, Nyttend,
I just saw your message an AN and I must say that I noticed your absence over the years but I hadn't noticed that you had returned and got your mop back. You were missed! We are short-handed in several admin areas on the project so, however you wish to contribute, your presence is very welcome. I myself took two years off, from 2016-2018 while I dealt with issues in my off-line life and I was glad I took a break. I hope you still find the work here satisfying. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask one of the old-timers. Liz 04:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see I already posted a belated welcome back in 2023, so just consider this a reprise! Liz 04:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
CSD removals
Hi, I'm not sure why you have removed the CSD tags from these articles. They're quite clearly hoaxes which means G3 is applicable. Here's a search result for one of the them AusLondonder (talk) 23:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
MRO
Hello Nyttend, could you please explain to me why you arbitrarily deleted Middlesex Record Office from the disambiguation page? In my opinion, the encyclopedic relevance is clearly given due to the presence of the article about the successor organization. Max12Max (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Removal of CSD
Hi Nyttend,
I had requested a deletion of redirect Pain into Power to make way for AFC move of the draft article Draft:Pain into Power. The article cannot be reviewed or approved without actually deleting the redirect page. Can you kindly delete it? Cheers. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Please see MOS:GEOLINK
Hi Nyttend, I just made an edit to bring the Neal, Kansas, article in line with MOS:GEOLINK:
N Greenwood County, Kansas, United States (], ], ])
Y Greenwood County, Kansas, United States (], United States)
I happened to take a look at the history of the article and noticed that you have been recently working on this and some related articles. It would be great if you could also help to fix some of the overlinking in these articles, in line with MOS:GEOLINK. Thanks! —Bkell (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Robinson Township, Pennsylvania
The article Robinson Township, Pennsylvania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not required due to WP:TWODABS. Articles now appear separately at Robinson, and both link to each other.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Voice of Clam (talk) 07:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
"Cunty" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Cunty has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24 § Cunty until a consensus is reached. SmokeSomeDrinkSomePopOne (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Nyttend! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |  |
First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site Picture - precision location?
Hi Nyttend! You have an original picture attached to the First Denbigh Parish Church Archeological Site article here . In the description, you have it located 'off Miller Road' at 37° 06′ 14″ N, 76° 33′ 07″ W. Based on the NRHP nomination documentation, https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/VLR_to_transfer/PDFNoms/121-0037_First_Denbigh_Church_AE_Site_1982_Final_Nomination.pdf, the location was cited as being nearest 18 Walters Road, about 4500ft south, at the next creek convergence. Language in the NRHP doc described 15 feet out of 50 of the church having being lost to erosion before rip rap was added, implying it was right on the river. The Newport News property records at https://assessment.nnva.gov/PT/datalets/datalet.aspx?mode=sales&UseSearch=no&pin=178000121&jur=700&taxyr=2025&LMparent=20 also match the NRHP assertion of a Donald Shenk owning the land at the time of the 1981/2 submission. Before I update, do you happen to have a different source or personal knowledge that would put the location that 0.85 miles north, near Miller Road? Jacobsatterfield (talk) 18:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Saw your message, no rush, thank you - I'll try to remember to circle back in a few months.
- Jacobsatterfield (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
New message from LR.127
Message added 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
LR.127 (talk) 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Hurricane Kristy (2024)
I saw that two days ago you had overruled my decline of Hurricane Kristy (2024) and moved it into mainspace anyway. There was an active discussion as to whether Category 5 hurricanes warrant notability, and the article will now most likely be merged. Why did you move it? SirMemeGod 17:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Since you said you were curious about CTOP
Since you mentioned that you weren't familiar with the CTOP protection enforcements and were curious - if enforcing a protection of a page as part of WP:CTOP - there's a logging procedure outlined at Misplaced Pages:Contentious_topics#Logging to log said protection at the relevant subsection in the log, such as Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_enforcement_log#American_politics_(CT/AP) for enforcing an AMPOL protection so a history of such protections is centralized, for example to say be able to see how often a certain arbitration enforcement had to be enacted each year. As I'm editing fairly frequently on various CTOP articles and counter vandalism patrol, I've encountered my fair share of it, so I've become fairly familiar with the theoretical aspect of it to seek help from admins on it to help enforcement as necessary :) It's up to the admins discretion, but given the vandalism appeared clearly politically motivated, I would have considered it to fall under the AMPOL CTOP, which is why I suggested logging it, but it's up to you as the admin that imposed it of course :) Raladic (talk) 04:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
"Fishers Island, New York (old edit history)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Fishers Island, New York (old edit history) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 15 § Fishers Island, New York (old edit history) until a consensus is reached. Regards, SONIC678 05:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Pershing, Indiana for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pershing, Indiana is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pershing, Indiana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Mangoe (talk) 22:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
"White Home" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect White Home has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 16 § White Home until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (u — c) 00:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)