Revision as of 01:06, 1 February 2014 editCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits →File:Noel Coward Allan warren edit 1.jpg: done.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:31, 4 January 2025 edit undoGrorp (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,735 editsNo edit summary | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:Cirt/ |
{{User:Cirt/Quality improvement}} | ||
⚫ | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
⚫ | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
⚫ | |counter = |
||
⚫ | |minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
⚫ | |minthreadstoarchive = 2 | ||
⚫ | |algo = old( |
||
⚫ | |archive = User talk:Cirt/Archive %(counter)d | ||
⚫ | }} | ||
{{talkheader}} | {{talkheader}} | ||
{{WikiProjectGATasks}} | {{WikiProjectGATasks}} | ||
Line 15: | Line 7: | ||
|} | |} | ||
{| align=lef !important; | {| align=lef !important; | ||
|] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]: ], ], ], ] • • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]/] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • Article alerts: ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] {{Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/RfA Report}} | |] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]: ], ], ], ], ] • • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]/] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • Article alerts: ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] {{Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/RfA Report}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | {{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
⚫ | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
⚫ | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
⚫ | |counter = 24 | ||
|archiveheader = {{Talk archive navigation}} | |||
⚫ | |minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
⚫ | |minthreadstoarchive = 2 | ||
⚫ | |algo = old(91d) | ||
⚫ | |archive = User talk:Cirt/Archive %(counter)d | ||
⚫ | }} | ||
== Shout out for Social Justice Warrior article == | |||
*] | |||
== GAR possibly of interest == | |||
As someone who took an interest in ], you may have an interest in ]. Eventually, I plan to pursue a ] or ], but one of the articles in the set is currently controversial.--] <small>(] / ] / ] / ] / ])</small> 07:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Thank you for the notification, a bit busy at the moment but will try to have a look soon. — ''']''' (]) 07:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Fuck peer review, again == | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
I've listed the article ''''']''''' for peer review. | |||
Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at ]. | |||
Thank you for your time, | |||
— ''']''' (]) 01:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Social sciences and society reviews redux == | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
I will review these articles currently nominated at ] as ] candidates. — ''']''' (]) 17:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Update: Image reviews posted to both. — ''']''' (]) 17:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Added Stability review for each. — ''']''' (]) 21:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::Passed ] as GA. — ''']''' (]) 02:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::] placed as GA on Hold. — ''']''' (]) 03:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
==4th== | |||
::Thanks for your work on the 4th Amendment. With a little work, I think it could make it to FA. --] (]) 07:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::You're most welcome, {{u|HectorMoffet}}, — ''']''' (]) 10:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Dan Savage bibliography for FLC == | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
I've gone ahead and nominated ] for ] consideration, the discussion page is at ]. — ''']''' (]) 12:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Notice of posting to TFA nominations == | |||
Hi Cirt, A quick note to say that I gave you a shout out for your work on the "Social Justice Warrior" Misplaced Pages article. My review of the article is part of the Wackipedia series on The Outline. | |||
I've added '']'' to TFA nominations, discussion is at ]. — ''']''' (]) 22:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Articles to review for social sciences and society == | |||
<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)</small> | |||
#] | |||
#] | |||
I will review these articles currently nominated at ] as ] candidates. — ''']''' (]) 03:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Update: Posted Stability review, for both. — ''']''' (]) 03:53, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Completed Image Review for ]. Image review pending for ]. — ''']''' (]) 04:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::Update: Passed ] as GA. — ''']''' (]) 20:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::] placed as GA on Hold. — ''']''' (]) 21:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
== GA reviews == | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
Hey Cirt, thanks for the reviews! I'm a little busy these few days, but I'll try my best to respond to and make changes regarding the issues you've raised. --''']]''' 21:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:No problems, {{u|Well-rested}}, like I said, as long as I see you're making some good progress towards good article quality, that's a good thing. Keep me posted, — ''']''' (]) 21:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
==]== | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
I found a problem with this; could you please review and see if you A. agree there's an error, and B. if you do agree, if you find the edit sufficient to fix it? <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 01:01, 1 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
:{{done}}. Thank you, — ''']''' (]) 01:06, 1 February 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:31, 4 January 2025
This is Cirt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Misplaced Pages. | |
|
|
Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log Nominations list | edit |
Centralized discussion
|
|
AFD/T • T-7 • T-8 • T-2 • Relisted • AFDO • WP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Law, Internet, News, Medicine • AFD tool links • WP:DRV • WP:MFD • AIV • RFUB • UAA/CAT • RFPP • PER • CSD • AB • FAR • FAC urgents • TFAR • RSN • BLPN • FTN • GAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Freedom of speech • Human rights • Journalism • Sexology and sexuality • LGBT studies • Feminism • Women • Gender Studies • Women artists • Women's History • Women scientists • Women writers • Medicine • Law • Internet • Internet culture • Comedy • U.S. Supreme Court cases
|
Shout out for Social Justice Warrior article
Hi Cirt, A quick note to say that I gave you a shout out for your work on the "Social Justice Warrior" Misplaced Pages article. My review of the article is part of the Wackipedia series on The Outline.
Wackipedia - Social Justice Warrior
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenbharrison (talk • contribs) 16:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Portland Monthly
Portland Monthly has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Lobster (magazine)
Lobster (magazine) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for WSJ Magazine
WSJ Magazine has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)