Misplaced Pages

Professional foul: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:02, 17 February 2014 editLukeSurl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers28,672 edits Filling in 1 references using Reflinks← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:28, 27 June 2024 edit undoMaligneRange (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users685 editsm Association football: added DOGSO abbreviationTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit 
(170 intermediate revisions by 81 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Sporting term}}
{{for|the Tom Stoppard play|Professional Foul}} {{for|the Tom Stoppard play|Professional Foul}}
In various ]s, a '''professional foul''' is a deliberate act of ] intended to bring about an advantage for the perpetrator's team. Professional fouls are usually committed to prevent an opponent from scoring.
{{refimprove|date=April 2011}}

In ], a '''professional foul''' is a deliberate act of ], usually to prevent an opponent's scoring.
Various sports contain provisions in their rules to dissuade such acts. These either try to negate the advantage gained from such an act or apply additional punishments beyond those for an equivalent foul in normal circumstances.
== Association football == <!-- Anchor from redirect of article; caution. -->
In ], a professional foul involves a defender committing a ] in order to prevent the opponents from scoring, or to deny an obvious goal-scoring opportunity (DOGSO).<ref name="auto">{{Citation | title = Minutes of the IFAB Annual Meeting | place = The Culloden Hotel, Craigavad, Northern Ireland | pages = 12–15 | date = June 8, 1991}}</ref> The resulting ] or ] may offer the attacking team a lower chance of ] than the original playing position, and the defending player therefore has an incentive to tactically commit the foul.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/last-man-david-luiz-chelsea-hauled-down-evertons-kevin-mirallas-on-the-halfway-line-only-a-yellow/ |title=Last man David Luiz (Chelsea) hauled down Everton's Kevin Mirallas on the halfway line, only a yellow |publisher=www.101greatgoals.com |date=15 September 2013 |access-date=25 February 2012}}</ref> Offending players are cautioned or sent off in accordance with the circumstances of the foul, with the punishment dependent upon both the nature of the foul and the opportunity denied to the opposition by it.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://theifab.com/|title=LAW 12 - FOULS AND MISCONDUCT - Disciplinary action|website=International Football Association Board|language=en|access-date=2019-04-24}}</ref>

Under ], what constitutes an obvious goalscoring opportunity is left to the discretion of the referee; however, several factors are given to help referees decide. These are the distance between the offence and the goal, the likelihood of keeping or gaining control of the ball, the direction of the play, and the location and number of defenders.<ref>{{Citation | title = The Laws of the Game | series = FIFA | page = 132 | year = 2015 }}</ref>


==Association football==
{{seealso|Last man (association football)}}
Currently, if a player denies a player an obvious goal-scoring opportunity by foul means, whether deliberate or not, he is almost certain to be sent off.<ref> The Guardian, 13 October 2004</ref> An obvious goalscoring opportunity means that the attacker has the ball at or near his feet, is close to the goal area and is moving towards the goal, and has no more than one defender or the goalkeeper in his way. These are known by referees as the 4 Ds and only a foul that has all four can result in a red card.<ref name=4Ds>{{cite web|title=Obvious Goal-Scoring Opportunity Denied (The 4 Ds)|url=http://www.ussoccer.com/news/referee-programs/2002/09/obvious-goal-scoring-opportunity-denied-the-4-ds.aspx|work=US Soccer|accessdate=17 February 2014|date=16 September 2002}}</ref> Also if the foul occurs in the penalty area, the referee will award a ].
===History=== ===History===
The concept gained notoriety in ] after an infamous incident in the ] when ] of ] committed a deliberate foul on ] of ], when Allen had a clear run at goal. As the ], the ] (]) could only award West Ham a free kick<!-- meaning a penalty kick, or some other free kick, and if not a penalty then when did that become standard? -->, which he did. This provoked a national debate on deliberate fouls that denied opponents the chance to score a goal. At the time, the English game was suffering a downturn in attendances and the chairmen of the ] clubs decided to consider ways in which the game could be made exciting. A subcommittee was appointed to produce some suggestions, chaired by ] and including ] and ]. The concept gained attention in association football after an incident in the ] when ] of ] committed a deliberate foul on ] of ], when Allen had a clear run at goal. As the Laws of the Game stood, the ] (]) could only caution Young and award West Ham a free kick, which he did. This provoked a national debate on deliberate fouls that denied opponents the chance to score a goal.


At the time, the English game was suffering a downturn in attendances and the chairmen of the ] clubs decided to consider ways in which the game could be made more exciting. A subcommittee was appointed to produce some suggestions, chaired by ] and including ] and ].{{Citation needed|date=January 2018}} They recommended in 1982 that any offence that denies the attacking player an obvious scoring opportunity should be deemed "serious foul play" by the referee and would therefore receive a ], in order to deter offenders. However, the FA's refereeing committee abolished the rule in July 1983.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Nawrat |first=Chris |title=The Sunday Times Illustrated History of Football |last2=Hutchings |first2=Steve |publisher=Hamlyn |year=1994 |isbn=0-600-58824-6 |pages=253 |language=EN}}</ref> The rule was finally fixed into the Laws of the Game by the ] (IFAB) in 1990 and referees were instructed by FIFA for the ] to send players off for a professional foul.<ref name=IFAB>{{cite web|title=History of the Laws of the Game|url=http://www.theifab.com/history/laws|website=The IFAB|access-date=23 January 2018|date=2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181019224918/http://www.theifab.com/history/laws|archive-date=19 October 2018|url-status=dead}}</ref> In 1991 the IFAB made an addition which deemed that a player who committed a handling offence that denied an obvious goal-scoring opportunity should be sent off for serious foul play.<ref name="auto"/>
The sub-committee produced several suggestions, including making the professional foul a mandatory ] offence, which they submitted to the ] for consideration. All the suggestions were defeated. However, the Football League was determined to have their way, and instructed its referees that professional fouls (including deliberate handball to stop a goal being scored) should be deemed ], which was and is a mandatory red card offence. The new interpretation was first issued to referees prior to the 1982-83 season, and one of the first players to be ] for a professional foul was ] in the ].{{citation needed|date=April 2011}}


In 2016 the Laws of the Game were amended so that a professional foul resulting in a penalty kick would only result in a yellow card, providing that the player was making a genuine attempt for the ball.<Ref name = double>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36047575 |title=Denying a goalscoring opportunity: Red card rule relaxed by IFAB |website=BBC Sport |publisher=BBC |date=14 April 2016 |access-date=16 May 2020}}</ref> This amendment was made to reduce the "double jeopardy" of a professional foul resulting in both a red card and a penalty kick.<Ref name = double/>
FIFA first instructed its referees to send off for a professional foul prior to the ], and in ] IFAB added decisions to the law which provided that a player who committed a foul or handling offence that denied an obvious goal-scoring opportunity should be sent off for serious foul play. These decisions were incorporated in the laws in 1997.
===Notable incidents===
In 1998 a tackle by ], playing for ] at ], who ran from within the Newcastle penalty area almost the length of the pitch to run down and trip ]'s ] - with a clear goalscoring opportunity one on one with United goalkeeper ]. Solskjær was immediately sent off by referee ] (with the match finishing 1–1 and prolonging the ] title race with ]).<ref> guardian.co.uk, 28 August 2007</ref><ref> YouTube</ref>


==American football==
In the ], Arsenal's ] brought down ] ], then ] tapped into an empty net. However referee ] overruled the goal, awarded Barcelona a free kick on the edge of the box, and showed a red card to Lehmann, making him the first player and only goalkeeper to ever be sent off in a Champions League/European Cup final. According to Arsenal, the general consensus was that the goal should have stood and that the Gunners continue the game with eleven players.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/ggm-15-arsenal-play-in-european-cup-final |title=GGM 15: Arsenal play in European Cup Final &#124; Greatest 50 Moments &#124; History |publisher=Arsenal.com |date=2007-08-30 |accessdate=2014-02-17}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/arsenal/article1706542.ece | location=London | work=The Times | first=Matt | last=Hughes | title=Lehmann to sign new contract | date=26 April 2007}}</ref>
{{Main|Unfair act}}
In American football, the rules regarding ] empower officials to enforce additional penalties so as to counteract the potential benefit a team may gain from a major or repeated foul.


In order to get a more favourable field position for a ] or to run the clock down while leading a game, it can happen that a team takes a ] penalty of five yards by running down the ] on purpose.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2020/1/5/21050173/tennessee-titans-new-england-patriots-rulebook-loophole-penalties-clock|title=Titans' Mike Vrabel used Bill Belichick's rules loophole against him|publisher=SBNation.com|date=5 January 2020|access-date=5 August 2020}}</ref> When looking for a lower field position for a punt, it is to prevent a ] by having the punt go into the end zone.
Another controversial situation occurred during the ] quarter-final between ] and ]. In extra time with the match tied 1–1, Uruguay's ] committed a deliberate goal line ] save from Ghana's ] in the last minute of the second extra time period. As per the laws of the game, the referee issued Suárez a straight red card and awarded a penalty kick to Ghana, but ] missed on the penalty kick, leaving the game level at the final whistle.<ref> The Telegraph, 3 July 2010</ref> Uruguay went on to win 4-2 in the shootout, and Suárez' teammates carried him around the pitch as a hero. Suárez afterward said, "The ']' now belongs to me. Mine is the real 'Hand Of God'. I made the best save of the tournament." He was banned for the next match, although some have argued for and against lengthening the suspension.<ref> Calgary Herald, 3 July 2010</ref><ref> guardian.co.uk, 3 July 2010</ref> Ghana's ] argued that the referee should have allowed the goal to stand instead of pointing to the spot, stating, "In the same situation , there is no chance the Ghana players would have used our hand."<ref> thestar.com, 3 July 2010</ref><ref> BBC Sport, 3 July 2010</ref> Since Suárez's handball offense was committed at the end of extra time, there was no further period of play where his team was reduced to ten men, as opposed to if he had received the red card earlier in the match.


==Rugby league== ==Basketball==
{{main article|Hack-a-Shaq|Personal foul (basketball)#Strategy}}
The professional foul in rugby league embodies a similar concept, a deliberate breach of the rules in order to prevent a scoring opportunity. The penalty for this offence is 10 minutes in the ].
In basketball, teams may deliberately commit ] for strategic reasons.<ref>Dudley, Carl A. (26 January 2006). " {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070426072523/http://iaabo134.org/media/articlesbyref-2-60126-dudley.htm |date=2007-04-26 }}", International Association of Approved Basketball Officials, Board #134 Information Release<BR>"In a close match, with seconds ticking down and a team being down by one or two points, a coaching strategy could be to foul and stop the clock and make the other team earn their victory by way of the free throw."</ref> As the resulting ]s must be taken by the fouled player, teams may tactically choose to foul a player with a poor free-throw percentage. This became known as "]" after ] who was a target of such tactics. Trailing teams often also commit intentional fouls late in games in order to stop the clock and get the ball back, rather than allow the opponent to run out the clock.


In addition, there are specific rules governing obvious goal scoring opportunities called clear path fouls.
The majority of professional fouls are either holding down the tackled player after a break has been made in order to allow his teammates to reform in defence, interfering in the play when making little or no attempt to return to an onside position, or tackling or impeding the progress of a player not in possession when a try may possibly be scored. The latter situation may result in a ].


{{See also|Playing rugby league}} ==Rugby league==
{{Further|Playing rugby league}}
The professional foul in rugby league embodies a similar concept to other sports, a deliberate breach of the rules in order to prevent a scoring opportunity. The penalty for this offence is 10 minutes in the ].


The majority of professional fouls are either holding down the tackled player after a break has been made in order to allow his teammates to reform in defence, interfering in the play when making little or no attempt to return to an onside position, or tackling or impeding the progress of a player not in possession when a try may possibly be scored. The latter situation may result in a ].
==Rugby union==
]s are instructed to sanction professional fouls with a ], resulting in the player spending ten minutes in the ].


==See also== ==Rugby union==
Law 10.2a of the Laws of Rugby deals with intentional infringements. ]s are instructed to award a ] in such instances and admonish, caution (resulting in a ] from the game), or ] the offender. A ] can be awarded if the referee believes the offence probably prevented a try being scored.<ref name=IRB_10.2>{{cite web|title=Laws of the Game - Rugby Union: 10.2 Unfair play|url=http://www.irblaws.com/index.php?highlight=penalty%20try&law=10.2|website=International Rugby Board|access-date=3 November 2014}}</ref>
*], the equivalent term in gridiron football
* ]


== References == == References ==
{{reflist}} {{reflist|30em}}

==External links==
* The Guardian, 13 October 2004


] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 07:28, 27 June 2024

Sporting term For the Tom Stoppard play, see Professional Foul.

In various sports, a professional foul is a deliberate act of foul play intended to bring about an advantage for the perpetrator's team. Professional fouls are usually committed to prevent an opponent from scoring.

Various sports contain provisions in their rules to dissuade such acts. These either try to negate the advantage gained from such an act or apply additional punishments beyond those for an equivalent foul in normal circumstances.

Association football

In association football, a professional foul involves a defender committing a foul in order to prevent the opponents from scoring, or to deny an obvious goal-scoring opportunity (DOGSO). The resulting free kick or penalty may offer the attacking team a lower chance of scoring than the original playing position, and the defending player therefore has an incentive to tactically commit the foul. Offending players are cautioned or sent off in accordance with the circumstances of the foul, with the punishment dependent upon both the nature of the foul and the opportunity denied to the opposition by it.

Under Law 12, what constitutes an obvious goalscoring opportunity is left to the discretion of the referee; however, several factors are given to help referees decide. These are the distance between the offence and the goal, the likelihood of keeping or gaining control of the ball, the direction of the play, and the location and number of defenders.

History

The concept gained attention in association football after an incident in the 1980 FA Cup Final when Willie Young of Arsenal committed a deliberate foul on Paul Allen of West Ham United, when Allen had a clear run at goal. As the Laws of the Game stood, the referee (George Courtney) could only caution Young and award West Ham a free kick, which he did. This provoked a national debate on deliberate fouls that denied opponents the chance to score a goal.

At the time, the English game was suffering a downturn in attendances and the chairmen of the Football League clubs decided to consider ways in which the game could be made more exciting. A subcommittee was appointed to produce some suggestions, chaired by Jimmy Hill and including Matt Busby and Bobby Charlton. They recommended in 1982 that any offence that denies the attacking player an obvious scoring opportunity should be deemed "serious foul play" by the referee and would therefore receive a red card, in order to deter offenders. However, the FA's refereeing committee abolished the rule in July 1983. The rule was finally fixed into the Laws of the Game by the International Football Association Board (IFAB) in 1990 and referees were instructed by FIFA for the 1990 World Cup to send players off for a professional foul. In 1991 the IFAB made an addition which deemed that a player who committed a handling offence that denied an obvious goal-scoring opportunity should be sent off for serious foul play.

In 2016 the Laws of the Game were amended so that a professional foul resulting in a penalty kick would only result in a yellow card, providing that the player was making a genuine attempt for the ball. This amendment was made to reduce the "double jeopardy" of a professional foul resulting in both a red card and a penalty kick.

American football

Main article: Unfair act

In American football, the rules regarding unfair acts empower officials to enforce additional penalties so as to counteract the potential benefit a team may gain from a major or repeated foul.

In order to get a more favourable field position for a punt or to run the clock down while leading a game, it can happen that a team takes a delay of game penalty of five yards by running down the play clock on purpose. When looking for a lower field position for a punt, it is to prevent a touchback by having the punt go into the end zone.

Basketball

Main articles: Hack-a-Shaq and Personal foul (basketball) § Strategy

In basketball, teams may deliberately commit personal fouls for strategic reasons. As the resulting free throws must be taken by the fouled player, teams may tactically choose to foul a player with a poor free-throw percentage. This became known as "Hack-a-Shaq" after Shaquille O'Neal who was a target of such tactics. Trailing teams often also commit intentional fouls late in games in order to stop the clock and get the ball back, rather than allow the opponent to run out the clock.

In addition, there are specific rules governing obvious goal scoring opportunities called clear path fouls.

Rugby league

Further information: Playing rugby league

The professional foul in rugby league embodies a similar concept to other sports, a deliberate breach of the rules in order to prevent a scoring opportunity. The penalty for this offence is 10 minutes in the sin bin.

The majority of professional fouls are either holding down the tackled player after a break has been made in order to allow his teammates to reform in defence, interfering in the play when making little or no attempt to return to an onside position, or tackling or impeding the progress of a player not in possession when a try may possibly be scored. The latter situation may result in a penalty try.

Rugby union

Law 10.2a of the Laws of Rugby deals with intentional infringements. Referees are instructed to award a penalty kick in such instances and admonish, caution (resulting in a temporary suspension from the game), or send off the offender. A penalty try can be awarded if the referee believes the offence probably prevented a try being scored.

References

  1. ^ Minutes of the IFAB Annual Meeting, The Culloden Hotel, Craigavad, Northern Ireland, June 8, 1991, pp. 12–15{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  2. "Last man David Luiz (Chelsea) hauled down Everton's Kevin Mirallas on the halfway line, only a yellow". www.101greatgoals.com. 15 September 2013. Retrieved 25 February 2012.
  3. "LAW 12 - FOULS AND MISCONDUCT - Disciplinary action". International Football Association Board. Retrieved 2019-04-24.
  4. The Laws of the Game, FIFA, 2015, p. 132
  5. Nawrat, Chris; Hutchings, Steve (1994). The Sunday Times Illustrated History of Football. Hamlyn. p. 253. ISBN 0-600-58824-6.
  6. "History of the Laws of the Game". The IFAB. 2017. Archived from the original on 19 October 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
  7. ^ "Denying a goalscoring opportunity: Red card rule relaxed by IFAB". BBC Sport. BBC. 14 April 2016. Retrieved 16 May 2020.
  8. "Titans' Mike Vrabel used Bill Belichick's rules loophole against him". SBNation.com. 5 January 2020. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
  9. Dudley, Carl A. (26 January 2006). "The Most Important Form of Official Communication: The Pre-Game Conference Archived 2007-04-26 at the Wayback Machine", International Association of Approved Basketball Officials, Board #134 Information Release
    "In a close match, with seconds ticking down and a team being down by one or two points, a coaching strategy could be to foul and stop the clock and make the other team earn their victory by way of the free throw."
  10. "Laws of the Game - Rugby Union: 10.2 Unfair play". International Rugby Board. Retrieved 3 November 2014.
Categories: