Revision as of 18:44, 21 February 2014 view sourceSean.hoyland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers34,684 edits →A barnstar for you!← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:28, 10 January 2025 view source Sean.hoyland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers34,684 edits →eMail | ||
(924 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{multiple image | |||
] | |||
| align = center | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| width = 400 | |||
| header = Khirbet 'Ein Karzaliyah ({{langx|ar|خربة عين كرزلية}}), Jordan Valley: December 2013 - January 2014 | |||
| image1 = Demolition of Khirbet Ein Karzaliyah community 8Jan2014 01.jpg | |||
| caption1 = | |||
| image2 = Demolition of Khirbet Ein Karzaliyah community 8Jan2014 02.jpg | |||
| caption2 = | |||
| image3 = Demolition of Khirbet Ein Karzaliyah community 8Jan2014 07.jpg | |||
| caption3 = | |||
⚫ | }} | ||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = center | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| width = 400 | |||
| header = Id'eis ({{langx|ar|ادعيس}}), Jordan Valley: May 2014 | |||
| image1 = Id'eis community in the Jordan Valley May 2014 4 8.jpg | |||
| caption1 = | |||
| image2 = Id'eis community in the Jordan Valley May 2014 8 5.jpg | |||
| caption2 = | |||
| image3 = Id'eis community in the Jordan Valley May 2014 6 7.jpg | |||
| caption3 = | |||
⚫ | }} | ||
{{tmbox|text=This user talk page might be <span class="plainlinks"></span> by friendly ''']''' which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is '''appreciated.'''|image=]}} | {{tmbox|text=This user talk page might be <span class="plainlinks"></span> by friendly ''']''' which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is '''appreciated.'''|image=]}} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 75K | |maxarchivesize = 75K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 19 | ||
|minthreadsleft = 0 | |minthreadsleft = 0 | ||
|algo = old(5d) | |algo = old(5d) | ||
|archive = User talk:Sean.hoyland/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Sean.hoyland/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no|<inputbox> | |||
{{archive box collapsible | |||
|auto=long | |||
|<inputbox> | |||
bgcolor=transparent | bgcolor=transparent | ||
type=fulltext | type=fulltext | ||
Line 21: | Line 42: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Exploitation of (fake) personal suffering == | |||
== Dispute resolution == | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I appreciate all the work you're doing. You seem to be everywhere. Keep up the constructive edits, ] ] 02:47, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | |||
:Thanks. To quote my favorite vandal = , "spreading the truth, kicking ass and taking names. Look for me wherever there is a troll that needs to be shanked or an article which needs to be fixed. I will be there, whispering on the wind." If only all vandals were as entertaining as him. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 08:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
For what ever reason I read that quote and hear: ]] (]) 04:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Civilian Casualty Ratio == | |||
You wrote in the Sockpuppet investigation that Rajoub made such claims which made me remember that even HaOfa had made similar claims regarding his family in northern israel or Golan heights when he was late to reply in an ArbCom case. ] (]) 05:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Sean, I'd just like to ask for clarification of the ratio edit that you reverted on ]. It doesn't seem to make sense that 182% of the casualties were civilians, which is the way most lay readers of Misplaced Pages will understand it. It ''does'' make sense to express this as "67% of the casualties were civilians". Note that 2:1 is expressed as 67% under the WWII section. The article should be consistent and clear enough for a non-mathematician to understand. ] (]) 14:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Yes, I remember, but many people were displaced, so maybe there was some truth in it, who knows. ] (]) 05:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:Apologies, I understand why you made that change now. I agree that it is far clearer for the reader to see statements of the form "67% of the casualties were civilians" or things like "The civilian to combatant fatality rate in World War II lies somewhere between 3:2 and 2:1, or from 60% to 67% ''of the total number of casualties were civilians''". But I think the word ratio should be used instead of rate. Rate is the wrong word. Yes, there really is no limit to my pedantry. Or maybe rate is the right word in this specific context. I don't know actually. Perhaps you do. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 14:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
::If an editor makes all edits related to Jewish topics, doesn't leave descriptions but sometimes leaves detailed ones and uses deprecated sources like JNS and Jerusalem post. Is this a Icewhiz trait? ] (]) 05:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
My understanding of ''rate'' in this context is that it is a calculation of the casualties sustained within a given time period, as in ''annual casualty rate''. I agree with you that ''ratio'' is the correct term here, as we are comparing combatant casualties to noncombatant casualties. This article is really kind of a mess, but cleanup will require some serious research into the statistics, which is more than I have time to do at present. I'd like to add a section on civilian casualties in Afghanistan but the amount of information on this subject is massive.] (]) 15:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::Not really. There are thousands of different accounts/IPs active in the topic area, so the risk of confirmation bias is pretty high. ] (]) 05:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Nice Biography == | |||
== Use of RfC for Contentious Topics == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
Hello. A question I thought you might be able to help me with. Given the failure of an edit request on a contentious topic to receive any reply, is the next step RfC? Many thanks. ] (]) 20:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
:{{u|Johnadams11}}, I don't know actually, other than a wait-and-see approach. I try to stay away from handling well-formed edit requests and other consensus forming processes so I've kind of forgotten how it is meant to work when an edit request isn't processed. I've added an edit extended-protected template so it gets added to Category:Misplaced Pages extended-confirmed-protected edit requests. That might get someone's attention. Probably better to ask someone like ScottishFinnishRadish. They know how things are meant to work. ] (]) 03:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Honest Man''' | |||
::Thank you. I appreciate the reply. ] (]) 14:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC) ] (]) 14:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
|- | |||
:::If it's Arab/Israel related you cannot start an RFC. Generally, if no one has implemented an edit request, especially if it is templated appropriately, you can assume there is no consensus for the change. ] (]) 15:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Continue to search for more knowledge. ] (]) 18:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | |||
== |
== eMail == | ||
{{You've got mail}} | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diplomacy''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | trying to amicable resolve ] (]) 18:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
It's nothing urgent. ] (]) 12:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Hey, thanks. That was nice of you. Enjoy editing Misplaced Pages. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 18:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Got it. Thanks. ] (]) 13:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:28, 10 January 2025
Khirbet 'Ein Karzaliyah (Arabic: خربة عين كرزلية), Jordan Valley: December 2013 - January 2014 Id'eis (Arabic: ادعيس), Jordan Valley: May 2014This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Exploitation of (fake) personal suffering
You wrote in the Sockpuppet investigation that Rajoub made such claims which made me remember that even HaOfa had made similar claims regarding his family in northern israel or Golan heights when he was late to reply in an ArbCom case. Theofunny (talk) 05:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I remember, but many people were displaced, so maybe there was some truth in it, who knows. Sean.hoyland (talk) 05:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- If an editor makes all edits related to Jewish topics, doesn't leave descriptions but sometimes leaves detailed ones and uses deprecated sources like JNS and Jerusalem post. Is this a Icewhiz trait? Theofunny (talk) 05:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not really. There are thousands of different accounts/IPs active in the topic area, so the risk of confirmation bias is pretty high. Sean.hoyland (talk) 05:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- If an editor makes all edits related to Jewish topics, doesn't leave descriptions but sometimes leaves detailed ones and uses deprecated sources like JNS and Jerusalem post. Is this a Icewhiz trait? Theofunny (talk) 05:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Use of RfC for Contentious Topics
Hello. A question I thought you might be able to help me with. Given the failure of an edit request on a contentious topic to receive any reply, is the next step RfC? Many thanks. Johnadams11 (talk) 20:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Johnadams11, I don't know actually, other than a wait-and-see approach. I try to stay away from handling well-formed edit requests and other consensus forming processes so I've kind of forgotten how it is meant to work when an edit request isn't processed. I've added an edit extended-protected template so it gets added to Category:Misplaced Pages extended-confirmed-protected edit requests. That might get someone's attention. Probably better to ask someone like ScottishFinnishRadish. They know how things are meant to work. Sean.hoyland (talk) 03:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I appreciate the reply. Johnadams11 (talk) 14:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC) Johnadams11 (talk) 14:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- If it's Arab/Israel related you cannot start an RFC. Generally, if no one has implemented an edit request, especially if it is templated appropriately, you can assume there is no consensus for the change. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I appreciate the reply. Johnadams11 (talk) 14:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC) Johnadams11 (talk) 14:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
It's nothing urgent. I.M.B. (talk) 12:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Got it. Thanks. Sean.hoyland (talk) 13:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)