Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Super-team: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:48, 24 March 2014 editGene93k (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers468,077 edits Listing at WP:DELSORT under Management (FWDS)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:35, 14 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was: already '''redirected to ]''' per the discussion. ] (]) 19:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}


:{{la|Super-team}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|Super-team}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
Line 7: Line 13:


This is a significant term when discussing collaboration among high ranking professionals on a project that requires high level expertise in multiple areas. ] (]) 17:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC) This is a significant term when discussing collaboration among high ranking professionals on a project that requires high level expertise in multiple areas. ] (]) 17:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
::It isn't. None of the sources appear to mention "super team" that I could tell. In reviewing the first cite, which appears to be someone's college term paper, it appears that most of the material in the article was copied word for word. I've deleted the article as a copyright infringement accordingly. It's been a while since I've closed an AFD, so if someone could do that for me. ] ] 02:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


I've added a ''to do'' list and links to existing articles. This article is not specific to one industry so can not be construed as jargon. It is a leadership concept as well as a term. ] (]) 19:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC) I've added a ''to do'' list and links to existing articles. This article is not specific to one industry so can not be construed as jargon. It is a leadership concept as well as a term. ] (]) 19:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 22:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 22:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)</small>

There are no copyright infringments in the article . . . if I could ban you I most certainly would do just that. ] (]) 15:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

*'''comment''' this article topic appears to be a duplicate subject of ] and should probably be redirected there. <s>It qualifies for A10 imo, but as the G12 was declined by {{u|Smartse}} I won't renom. </s> ] (]) 17:13, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
::Apparently A10 should not be used where a redirect is a valid result, so nm on that point, but still '''redirect''' ] (]) 17:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

*'''REDIRECTED''' per https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Stmullin&diff=601232768&oldid=601232206 ] (]) 18:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 04:35, 14 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: already redirected to High-performance_teams per the discussion. Black Kite (talk) 19:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Super-team

Super-team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

appears to be a non notable business jargon neologism. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

This is a significant term when discussing collaboration among high ranking professionals on a project that requires high level expertise in multiple areas. Stmullin (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

It isn't. None of the sources appear to mention "super team" that I could tell. In reviewing the first cite, which appears to be someone's college term paper, it appears that most of the material in the article was copied word for word. I've deleted the article as a copyright infringement accordingly. It's been a while since I've closed an AFD, so if someone could do that for me. Kuru (talk) 02:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

I've added a to do list and links to existing articles. This article is not specific to one industry so can not be construed as jargon. It is a leadership concept as well as a term. 174.99.59.109 (talk) 19:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

There are no copyright infringments in the article . . . if I could ban you I most certainly would do just that. 174.99.59.109 (talk) 15:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Apparently A10 should not be used where a redirect is a valid result, so nm on that point, but still redirect Gaijin42 (talk) 17:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.