User talk:Jayaguru-Shishya: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:07, 26 March 2014 editJayaguru-Shishya (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users10,964 edits Nope. No edit war. Please see the reverts and the time span they were made before making any false accusations. Thanks.← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 20:43, 30 October 2024 edit undoDreamRimmer bot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Extended confirmed users17,025 editsm Fix mass message error per WP:AWBREQ
(816 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
			\|archive = User talk:Jayaguru-Shishya/Archive %(counter)d
			\|algo = old(30d)
			\|counter = 2
			\|maxarchivesize = 200K
			\|minthreadsleft = 5
			\|minthreadstoarchive = 1
			\|archiveheader = {{aan}}
			}}
			{{archives\|auto=yes\|search=yes\|title=Past talking\|image=File:Two Patriarchs.jpg\|image-size=100px}}

			<span style="color:darkgreen;"><span style="font-size:15pt">'''Real-life workload: 9'''</span></span>
	==Welcome!==
			*'''1 = no work pressure'''
			*'''5 = middling'''
			*'''> 5 = please don't expect much'''
			*'''10 = frenzied'''
			*'''11 = ]'''

			== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
	]]] ], Jayaguru-Shishya! Thank you for ]. I am ] and I have been editing Misplaced Pages for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on ]. You can also check out ] or type {{tlx\|helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	Also, when you post on ] you should ] using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! ] (]) <small>(formerly ])</small> 16:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

			<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
	== August 2013 ==
			<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2020\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
	] Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to ] has been undone by an automated computer program called ].
	{{clear}}
	* ClueBot NG makes very few ], but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please ], , remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
	* For help, take a look at the ].
	* The following is the log entry regarding this message: ] was by ] ] ] ANN scored at 0.913283 on 2013-08-30T14:00:56+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 1718027 -->. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 14:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	== Genre bickering: ==

			If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
	] Please stop your random biased genre bickering particularly on the ] related bands and artists. It seems you're desperately removing them whether including or excluding sources. If you've got any problem please be patient, discuss on talk page and wait for a general consensus.--] (]) 11:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
			</td></tr>
			</table>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=990308339 -->

			== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
	== "DO NOT REMOVE OR EDIT THE ENTRIES ON TALK PAGE" ==

			<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
	Please show me the edit where I did this (hint: I didn't). You should check the talk page history before you go shouting at other editors. ] (]) 09:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
			<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2021\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	== January 2014 ==
	] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

			If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
	To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> — '''''] ]''''' 18:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
			</td></tr>
			</table>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1056563328 -->

			== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
	:Dear Richard BB, there is no on-going edit-warring. No more on my part than, for example Shallowmead077's part. There is a Misplaced Pages rule that entries made on talk pages '''should not be removed'''. However, certain writers do that after each single entry.

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	:When it comes to articles, there are on-going discussions at the talk page, ones which the other contributors who keep reverting every single change refuse to attend to. Besides, they are involved in reverting as much as I do + 1, so please point your claiming finger equally to them.
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2022\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	:Every single time I have removed some section, it's since there are no grounds ever so far for the claims represented; the sources do not make such statement they are referred to support even, the sources are completely unreliable, etc. It is not my part to proove that "God doesn't exist". If one makes a claim without sources, it is his/her obligation to prove it right, not the other way around. ] (]) 20:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
	::Firstly, I'd ask you to provide diffs of talk page posts being removed. Secondly, even if that has happened, it doesn't negate the fact you ''are'' edit warring. Finally, I think you need to read ], which I have linked you too numerous times. All everyone else is doing is reverting to the status quo, while you are actively trying to ''change'' things. No one else is changing anything, they're just reverting to the version which last had consensus. If you have an issue you have to take it to the talk page ''first'', and then alter it ''after'' you have consensus. So far, you do not have consensus. When multiple editors keep reverting you, it should be a clue that you're doing something wrong. Until your version is agreed upon, the old version stays: it's as simple as that. Now I'd ask you to stop edit warring and simply talk things out first. — '''''] ]''''' 23:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
	:::He posted on my user page, not on my talk page. --] (]) 18:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
	:::Dear Richard BB, as I have told you numerous times: there is an on-going discussion at the talk page, one which you have not attended to. You just keep rudely reverting the edits even without discussing the changes at the talk pages.
	:::So far, I have presented the very grounds for the changes I have made; it has been open for discussion at the talk pages; and it has not been opposed.
	:::Therefore, stop reverting the edits and please participate the discussion at the talk pages if you should have any further doubts. Thanks. ] (]) 18:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
	::::And ''I'' have told ''you'', these discussions need to end before you get ''your'' way. I have to repeat myself now: '''read ]'''. Because your edits are disputed, we revert to the status quo for the time being. If your edits weren't disputed, then we'd certainly allow your version. However, until we attain consensus, we do not accept your version. — '''''] ]''''' 19:07, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

			</div>
	==Removing sourced content==
			</div>
	You don't get to arbitrarily declare sources as "invalid" just because you don't agree with the content. I suggest you stop removing sourced section without getting some sort of consensus on the talk page '''before''' removing any established content. <b>] ]</b> 18:54, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1124425179 -->

			== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
	] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of ] to ] because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> <span style="font-family:Black Chancery;text:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">''']''' (]) 18:02, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	{{Talkback\|:Talk:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy#Novels: So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish}}
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
	== March 2014 ==
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2023\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
	:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
	*<nowiki>'''Hanbok''' (South Korea) or '''Chosŏn-ot''' (North Korea) is the traditional</nowiki>{{red\|'''['''}}<nowiki>Korean dress. It is often characterized by vibrant colors and simple lines without pockets.</nowiki>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 19:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
	] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
	:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
	<nowiki> Nico</nowiki>{{red\|''']]'''}}<nowiki> – collaborator on vocals with the band on four tracks on ''The Velvet Underground & Nico''</nowiki>
	It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, -2, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 20:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

			</div>
	== Hanbok ==
			</div>
	Please stop removing sourced content and add information that is contradictory to those reliable sources that you have removed. Finding reliable sources for additional information that you add is your burden, not others. Also, use the talk page to discuss relevant matters. ] (]) 22:19, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1187132222 -->

			== Invitation to participate in a research ==
	:Thanks for your message Cydevil38. I'm sorry but I did not mean to remove reliable source. However, I do find that the sources that I restored back to the article (I haven't discovered them in the first place) are reliable enough as well, and they are stating things different. ] (]) 17:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

			Hello,
	== Los Natas edits ==

			The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
	* Please see the definition of the word "coined."
	* Please use the correct method of asking for more information. It is not interpolating "such as?" into the text of an article.
	* There's no need to seek consensus on an article's talk page before making edits.
	<b><span style="color: #f33">·]·</span></b> 01:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

			You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
	:Hi Rodii. I think the right place for discussion is at ] where the other contributors could follow the discussion as well in order to improve the article. If you find errors though, you can also help to improve the article by correcting those faults instead of removing one's contributions. Thanks! ] (]) 17:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

			The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .
	== Appropriate level of wikilinking ==

			Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
	Good message at WT:MOSLINK. I do a lot of maintenance work that includes unlinking common terms and chronological items. But en.WP is ahead of the game in this respect compared with most of the other WPs. May I ask whether you have experience at another WP? And if so, whether you've had any success in convincing other editors to use the wikilinking system more skilfully? I've watchlisted this page if you want to reply here. ] ] 11:51, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


	:Greetings there Tony1! And thanks for your message, I'm glad to hear that there is someone else concerned with the same problems too.

	:I agree with you, the English Misplaced Pages is way ahead it's other language version counterparts. I am currently contributing to the Finnish language Misplaced Pages aside from the English one, and I must say that I am really giving up hope with it completely... Few practices still vivid and alive at the Finnish Misplaced Pages:

	:1) They are linking all the dates (official WP-policy there, e.g. ], ])

	:2) ...linking a lot of common terms

	:3) ...linking compounded words from the middle even (e.g. ]pick)

	:=> If your try to remove excess linking - even with well-grounded reasons and participating the discussion at the Talk page - it is likely to just get reverted without any explanations. There is also a very little contributor base in the fi.wiki, and therefore it is pretty much the same group of contributors that keep patrolling on the changes in the articles and backing-up the doings of one an each other.
	:If there shall be any discussion though, it tends to be taken to your User -talk page, often on a very personal level, and taken away from below the eyes of the other article contributors...

			Kind Regards,
	:I have also launched a discussion at the fi.WP, one where "I got mistaken to refer" to the English Misplaced Pages policies. This resulted into fierce responses, according to which ''Finnish Misplaced Pages is completely different'', and that the ''English policies have no value at the Finnish side''. Well, that's actually true and I do understand it but.... how about benchmarking? Is it bad in general? In Finnihs Misplaced Pages, it seems it is.

			]
	:The Finnish Misplaced Pages has sunken deep with it's current conceptions, and the general mindset with wikilinks still seems to be "the more, the better".


			<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
	:That's pretty much my experiences in my rather small language version. Maybe I should just drift towards '''Citizendium''' (http://en.citizendium.org/Welcome_to_Citizendium) slowly xD ... How about your experiences Tony1? Which language edition you've been working with? ] (]) 19:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 -->
	::You might tell them that overlinking has the same ill effect for all readers—whether of en.WP or fi.WP. The particular language is irrelevant. The war about linking started with the ridiculous date-autoformatting that was introduced into en.WP in 2003 as a ham-fisted solution to editors' fights about US vs non-US formatting. Only logged-in editors who had chosen prefs saw any "benefit". Not readers.<p>The main battle was won about six years ago: what was surprising was the vehemence of objection, and the fact that within a year or two hardly any editor objected. The whole attitude has turned 180 degrees. It's a symptom of how crude the wikicultures are in other languages that readers don't count. The linking system is washed out and the text looks pretty bad, because no one has stood up to the mind-set of the geek-nuts who are in control. Very happy to have you editing here.
	::], ], ], ]. ] ] 11:24, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:43, 30 October 2024

Past talking

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Real-life workload: 9

1 = no work pressure
5 = middling
> 5 = please don't expect much
10 = frenzied
11 = Up to 11

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)