| Revision as of 10:40, 5 August 2004 edit221.128.80.18 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 08:13, 6 January 2025 edit undoSkyLined (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers4,580 edits →Missing climate information: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topic |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
I doubt Germany and the EU formally allow Montenegro to use Euro as an official curency |
|
|
|
{{Recurring themes |
|
|
|] was recognized by ] in December 2017. It is named as an official language in the ]. It is a ] of ]. |
|
|
|The ethnicity of inhabitants of Montenegro is a more political than a historical question. ] |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Article history |
|
|
|action1=FAC |
|
|
|action1date=04:26, 4 December 2006 |
|
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Montenegro/archive1 |
|
|
|action1result=not promoted |
|
|
|action1oldid=91882155 |
|
|
|action2=PR |
|
|
|action2date=12 July 2007 |
|
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Montenegro/archive1 |
|
|
|action2oldid=143857758 |
|
|
|currentstatus=FFAC |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Montenegro|importance=top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Countries}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Yugoslavia|importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Europe|importance=}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Eastern Europe|importance=}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 75K |
|
|
|counter = 4 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|algo = old(365d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Montenegro/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Missing climate information == |
|
:*currency: ] - even though Montenegro is not part of the ], it uses the euro after ] and the ] allowed it to use the German mark years ago. Now, since the ] was superceded by the euro, the euro is the official currency of Montenegro. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There does not appear to be any information about the climate of Montenegro on this page. Can somebody please add this? <span style="padding-left: 2em; white-space: nowrap">— ] <small>(])</small></span> 08:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
What is "calques"? -- ] |
|
|
|
|
|
: "calque" is a loan translation, an expression introduced into one language by translating it from another language. (from Wordnet dictionary) --] 14:20, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
''Some Montenegrins have in recent years shown a desire to separate Montenegro from the federation with jist of the separatist movement being among the Slavic Muslim and Albanian minorities who make up some 20% of the population'' -- what does this sentence mean? -- ] |
|
|
|
|
|
:I don't know, but it seems to make some kind of sense if you assume "jist" is a typo for "most"... -- ] |
|
|
|
|
|
::In recent years, some Montenegrins have shown a desire to separate from the Yugoslavian/Balkan/Serbian(?) Federation. The separatist movement consists mainly of Slavic Muslim and Albanian minorities, which consist of 20% of the Montenegrin population. --More sense? |
|
|
|
|
|
:::No, it makes no sense at all. I thought the seperatist movement was started by the Montenegrin Parliament and Montenegrin Government, right? And as far as I recall, neither the Montenegrin president nor prime minister are Muslim nor Albanian. Are you trying to say that Gjukanovic is in some way an Bosniak/Albanian agent, representing Bosniak/Albanian interests? Let me put in more straightforwardly, did Bosniaks and Albanians bring Djukanovic & Co. to power? No Montenegrin voted him in? Well, I thought Albanians had their own political parties, and so do the Bosniaks. |
|
|
|
|
|
:::How long will iditos like yourself continue to blame just about everything on Bosniaks and Albanians? When will you wake up and understand that now even your formal brothers Montenegrins can stand you and your Serb superiority policies any longer. |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
I should make note that Igor's edits spin the article towards the Serbian point of view, which is in conflict with the Montenegro government and hence the majority of voting population, contrary to what it may imply. The article needs to be made more neutral. --] 14:20, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
: I do not partake in such practices, there has been no reversal of power in Montenegro since 1945, the very party that held the media, government and police prior to any given election won it. There have been widespread reports of vote fraud and besides, the government won some 47% at the last elections, hardly an indisputable majority. |
|
|
|
|
|
:Regards, --] 3:22, 29 Sep 2003 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:: Aww, you seem to be losing your touch, this is one of the retorts that makes the least sense. --] 16:44, 29 Sep 2003 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
Parts of this page are extremely, um misleading. The idea of Montenegrin 'ethnicity' is totally modern, not even appearing before Serbia's (Raskian Serbia that is) independence from the Ottoman empire in the 20TH CENTURY. If your talking about free countries in history, Montenegrins for generations WERE the Serbs. Just making some sweeping comments that assume historical "Montenegrins" (which is what happens when you start off sentences w "Ethnic Montenegrins...."), well its playing w facts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Also your comments on language are just totally off-base, lies in fact. The major dialectal isoglosses of Serbo-Croat, EACH ONE of them in fact spreads geographically through Croatia, Bosnia-Hercegovina, AND Serbia. You give the impression that some special speech form local to montenegro is also the speech of Bosnia. No, Bosnian speech varies by location, but of course accents and well 'localisms', do converge at the Bosnian/Montenegrin border, the same is true in any country for almost any small areas next to each other. |
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, the article as written is some "thinly veiled" sort of pro-secessionist propaganda sheet. I wish people would stop writing articles for subjects they have no special knowledge of or in cases where they have no objectivity. |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
: I'm not particularly inclined to bother discerning what's meant by trashing their ethnicity as modern while the page says exactly the same, and replicates the percentages exactly as on the census. Your notion of each of the dialects being in each region is patent nonsense as it's štokavian that is everywhere, not the other three (unless you mean dialects of štokavian, which would be a really slippery slope). It's also very amusing to see you characterize a page last edited by user Igor as pro-secessionist propaganda. Keep it up :> --] 18:21, 17 Oct 2003 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I apologize,it was careless and not factual what i said about the dialects - i should have written that dialects present in Bosnia Montenegro and Serbia proper of Stokavian as you mentioned stretch through the entire Serbo-Croat area, and most importantly what is meant is that |
|
|
its not correct to Single out some special Montenegrin Dialect, because there isnt any - only in Croatia are you going to find areas that are linguistically unique. Whether Igor is pro or anti-secessionist is immaterial, because theres no expectation that an entire article will or should be re-written by every 'last contributer' - in fact its better to work on the articles in segments. The tone of the article (an article which i didnt change anyway)is apparent - it PRESUMES something which is in itself very controversial - something historically at least (even just to the borders of 'recent past') could have been discounted altogether - Montenegrin ethnicity. Anyone who reads the article will junp over step 1 (does this ethnicity exist) directly to "the ethnic montenegrins are considering secession). Theres no backround. |
|
|
|
|
|
During the era of Ottoman domination,Montenegrins were very proud to be the |
|
|
only free serbs, and were raised being serb. Does a montenegrin ethnicity |
|
|
exist today? - given the fact that 'ethnicity' always has an historical |
|
|
component, its difficult to say. If it does, id guess it couldnt have existed |
|
|
before Serbs deposed the Montenegrin monarchy and replaced in its own. |
|
|
Whoever adds to this article should be careful to give due mention to the |
|
|
sheerly political or lifestyle apects which can be extracted from talk of |
|
|
ethnicity. This article is lacking - its not written from a Neutral Point of |
|
|
View. Its not a major problem since the article is so crude/new anyway - my |
|
|
point in adding to the talk page rather than to the article proper is so that |
|
|
someone w interest will take all the biases out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
This article is written from a pro-Serb (i.e anti-Montenegro) point of view, comparable I would say to what an Argentine might write if asked to contribute to a section on the Falkland islands (Malvinas). |
|
|
|
|
|
Rgds, |
|
|
Stef |
|
There does not appear to be any information about the climate of Montenegro on this page. Can somebody please add this? — SkyLined (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
