Revision as of 10:45, 16 June 2014 editSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers113,348 edits →Review description: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:59, 19 August 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,879,760 editsm -Empty {{banner holder}}Tag: AWB |
(45 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown) |
Line 6: |
Line 6: |
|
|action1link=Talk:Quantum of Solace/GA1 |
|
|action1link=Talk:Quantum of Solace/GA1 |
|
|action1oldid=260477559 |
|
|action1oldid=260477559 |
|
|
|
|
|action2=GTC |
|
|action2=GTC |
|
|action2date=18:18, 23 January 2012 |
|
|action2date=18:18, 23 January 2012 |
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic candidates/James Bond films/archive1 |
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic candidates/James Bond films/archive1 |
|
|action2result=promoted |
|
|action2result=promoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|action3=GTR |
|
|
|action3date=20:10, 30 June 2016 |
|
|
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic removal candidates/James Bond films/archive1 |
|
|
|action3result=Demoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|action4=GTC |
|
|
|action4date=05:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic candidates/James Bond films/archive2 |
|
|
|action4result=promoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|action5=GTR |
|
|
|action5date=17:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic removal candidates/James Bond films/archive2 |
|
|
|action5result=Demoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|action6=GTC |
|
|
|action6date=20:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|action6link=Misplaced Pages:Featured and good topic candidates/James Bond films/archive3 |
|
|
|action6result=Promoted |
|
|
|
|
|ftname=James Bond films |
|
|ftname=James Bond films |
|
|currentstatus=GA |
|
|currentstatus=GA |
|
|topic=film |
|
|topic=film |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=GA| |
⚫ |
{{afd-merged-from|Agent Strawberry Fields|Agent Strawberry Fields|18 September 2012}} |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Film|German-task-force=yes|Italian-task-force=yes|British-task-force=yes|American-task-force=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBanners|1= |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Mid|USFilm=yes |USFilm-importance=High}} |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Film|class=GA|B-Class-1=yes|B-Class-2=yes|B-Class-3=yes|B-Class-4=yes|B-Class-5=yes|German-task-force=yes|Italian-task-force=yes|British-task-force=yes|American-task-force=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject James Bond|class=GA|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject James Bond|importance=High}} |
|
{{Outline of knowledge coverage|James Bond}} |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
⚫ |
{{afd-merged-from|Agent Strawberry Fields|Agent Strawberry Fields|18 September 2012}} |
|
{{Find sources notice}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Archived == |
|
|
I archived was on this page today.--] (]) 02:36, 25 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
== End title cards == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Ping|Supermann}} I won't argue with the change to cast listing, but why did you move the "end title cards" comment? Aren't Cuervo and everyone below him listed in the end credits? ] (]) 04:52, 7 October 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Thanks for pointing this out to me. I probably didn't appreciate how "<!-- end title cards -->" exactly works. Several seconds ago, I tried to put it behind Judi Dench and before Cuervo and preview the diff, it didn't seem to make a difference at all. Maybe you want to create a subsection like ]? Thanks. ] (]) 14:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Issues with the lead == |
|
|
|
|
|
The current formation of the lead is awkwardly worded (e.g., "22nd in the James Bond series produced by Eon Productions" implies they are canonically the same; Eon just produce, the films are not part of one larger universe) contains unnecessary fluff and partial spoilers (e.g., Camile's motivations are not part of the premise of the film, thus spoiling a key part of the plot) and is missing information (e.g., nothing regarding the film's theatrical release or who plays who to delineate the cast). These are only a handful of the issues with the lead, like I also outlined with '']'' (2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
The edit I proposed (https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Quantum_of_Solace&oldid=1108762003) provides a clearer, easier way to navigate reading the lead. In it, the film is described, the cast is outlined, a concise premise is given, relevant off-screen information is contained in one paragraph, and release information is added. ] (]) 20:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I don't see this as an improvement. Starting with the intro. Distribed by. Why must this mentioned? None other Bond have this. Also "22nd film in the Eon Productions James Bond series" because there are also non Eon Bonds made. Your edit doesn't make that clear.] (]) 04:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
::@], in the interest of concision and for us not to repeat ourselves, please see my response to your above concerns here (https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Casino_Royale_(2006_film)#Issues_with_the_lead). Also, just because no "other Bond" includes distribution does not make them exempt from the standards of articles as outlined in ]. Furthermore, distribution information is '''already''' included in the edit revision of '']'' you preferred. ] (]) 20:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
==007 in New York connection== |
|
|
The article is missing the fact the final sequence of the film, wherein Bond warns an agent that her boyfriend is the enemy, is taken from the short story "007 in New York" from the '']'' omnibus. ] (]) 20:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
:Please find a ] that says that so we can cite it when adding that bit of info. ] (]) 20:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
::I agree with you both: it is '''probably''' from 007 in NY, but without a reliable secondary source it remains ]. - ] (]) 20:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== "Bond captures Greene and interrogates him about Quantum" == |
|
== Review description == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't we add a few words of explanation that when Bond captures Greene and interrogates him about Quantum, this interrogation isn't actually shown on screen? ] (]) 00:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
Theironminer, Could you please stop edit warring and discuss your proposed changes. Your suggested text goes against a long-standing consensus and you need to stop editing and explain WHY you think the change is a positive one. I have left you notification that one more reversion will breach ], and I strongly advise you to read that policy before you edit that phrase again. - ] (]) 10:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC) |
|
The current formation of the lead is awkwardly worded (e.g., "22nd in the James Bond series produced by Eon Productions" implies they are canonically the same; Eon just produce, the films are not part of one larger universe) contains unnecessary fluff and partial spoilers (e.g., Camile's motivations are not part of the premise of the film, thus spoiling a key part of the plot) and is missing information (e.g., nothing regarding the film's theatrical release or who plays who to delineate the cast). These are only a handful of the issues with the lead, like I also outlined with Casino Royale (2006).