| Revision as of 19:38, 22 June 2014 editWinkelvi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,145 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:53, 2 September 2022 edit undoGidonb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users95,883 edits object | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Note == | |||
| Thanks for stopping by! | |||
| Not that it will make much difference in your day-to-day, but I've retired the "anti-filibuster" sanction that I placed on you in August 2018, so that no longer applies. The other sanctions are set to expire soon. {{pb}}Unrelated, but I remember in the previous site-ban discussion MONGO proposed some sort of reverse topic ban where you'd limit yourself to editing only 5 articles. That might be a starting point for an unblock...getting those articles to GA with no drama could be used as evidence to appeal for a less restrictive ban. I dunno...maybe it's a bad idea, but it's a start. <span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~] <small>(])</small></span> 19:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Here in Misplaced Pages, I go by "Winkelvi". I enjoy patrolling the ] page, looking for vandalism by IP addresses. While I try to be accurate with the reverts I make and the subsequent warnings I leave on talk pages, I am only human and will make mistakes from time to time. If you're here because of a revert I've made to one or more of your edits and you feel I've made an error, please leave me a (]) message below by clicking "New Section" above. | |||
| == Unblock request closed == | |||
| If you're here to whine, complain, or express anger, please go elsewhere. | |||
| You have likely seen this already, but I should probably notify you that I have your unblock request as unsuccessful. Please read the comments there carefully before any subsequent requests. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] (])</span> 19:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| One last thing: Some administrators and regular joe editors are great, some are total assholes, some administrators have had the tools way to long and have totally lost the idea behind the "anyone can edit" philosophy. If at all possible, they are best to be avoided. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{Like|username=Winkelvi}} | |||
| == Sockpuppet investigation == | |||
| <br> | |||
| <br> | |||
| You have been mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Winkelvi&redirect=no ] (]) 22:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == The Barnstar of Dilegence == | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Trump Baby Balloon at protest in Parliament Square.jpg== | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For keeping up with and reporting countless Monterrosa socks, I award you The Barnstar of Dilegence! ] (]) 01:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |}<!--Template:The Barnstar of Diligence--> | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 10:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| I humbly thank you, ] and will keep up the good fight! -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 02:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == If you are watching this page == | |||
| == Possible help == | |||
| Winkelvi - I think you should respond to the accusations of socking, especially if you are innocent. If you don't defend yourself, it will be assumed that you are guilty which makes it doubtful the community will allow you to return...provided you even want to return. j/s ] <sub>]</sub> | |||
| Winkelvi, given how you've been able to keep up with all those Monterrosa socks, perhaps you could help myself, {{noping|STATicVapor}}, {{noping|Homeostasis07}}, and {{noping|IndianBio}} track socks of a user named {{noping|Reece Leonard}}? To give some background, Reece is a user who last month got topic-banned from ] articles for persistently trying to make it seem as though critics responded more positively than they actually did (i.e. changes "mixed reviews" to "positive reviews") for her album '']''. Last week he got blocked for three days for ban evasion for trying to promote more positive reviews on ''Artpop'' (for which CheckUser confirmed a sock and the sock account was indef blocked) and afterwards just got blocked for a week for using an IP to remove negative reviews from the ''Artpop'' song "]" (another ban evasion attempt). While bans and blocks are separate things, I'm sure you can spot either type of evasion in users. You can talk to any of the other three people I mentioned for further details. ] (]) 06:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ] 15:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| : Even being completely truthful and saying it's not me, I'm pretty sure nothing I do at this point will mean squat. I recall being called a liar here numerous times, by regular editors and admins, when I wasn't lying, but being totally honest. I'm not wanted in Misplaced Pages, that's been plain since even before my indef, in addition to the subsequent denial of request to return, and now being "tried" and tagged as a sockmaster solely on circumstantial "behavioral" evidence by a relatively new editor and admin/CU with whom I've never interacted when I was editing. How anyone can believe they are knowledgeable of someone's behavior without ever experiencing that person's behavior is beyond my understanding and logic, but the result is what it is. Misplaced Pages as a mostly anonymous community has shown me it is unforgiving and the normal rules of the real world don't apply. Based on all that, I think trying to defend myself, drawing up a case, and being hopeful for a return to editing would be a complete waste of everyone's time and end only in disappointment for me. | |||
| ==Request For an Opinion== | |||
| Hi, Winkelvi. I apologize for some of the past disagreements we've had, and I'd very much like to say I value your opinion and appreciate your help. Hopefully there are no hard feelings between us. I'm dropping this message here to let you know I'd like to cite video interviews for the purpose of expanding the ] page and its related pages. I've taken a look at ] and ], and I don't think video interviews are barred from being used as sources. It would be very helpful as there's a lot of information in the video interviews that does not exist in any other medium. I've left a message on the Sound of Contact talk page for further discussion of the issue. | |||
| I do thank you for caring, though. '''<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span>''' ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 16:41, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| I'd like to ask if you'll approve of this before I get to work on adding information to the pages. Thanks! :) ] (]) 07:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I am so sorry you left. You were my friend :( ] <span style="color:Purple">(2020)</span> ] 18:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Good thing that got cleared up. Some folks see the boogeyman under the bed, in the closet, behind the couch.--] (]) 00:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ==Because you deserve it== | |||
| :Winkelvi was mean to me during the sockpuppet investigation that got me blocked 4 years ago. ] <span style="color:Purple">(2020)</span> ] 21:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I know that tracking sockpuppets and filing the appropriate reports is time consuming so your efforts with the socks of Monterossa are much appreciated. Cheers ] | ] 17:59, 27 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |}{{z147}} | |||
| 😂 ] (]) 11:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| This is awesome - especially the knight's suit of armor. Thanks, ]. I will wear it proudly! -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 18:14, 27 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| For the record, I object to ''any'' unblocking of this user! ] (]) 21:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Please Check Your Comments at ] == | |||
| I may be mistaken, but it appears that another editor edited your comments at ] in which you advised him to drop the stick and back away from the dead horse. If so, the other editor was guilty of a serious talk page violation. ] (]) 21:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you, Robert. I did replace them with a new sig and time/date stamp. Appreciate the notification. I'm really, really tired of the drama. Would rather just talk it out on the article talk page and edit the article. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 21:36, 2 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Edits by Enter333 == | |||
| Thanks for nominating the "world cinema filmographies" category as mentioned above. | |||
| ] seems to have left a lot of other unexplained edits which need reviewing and in many cases reverting. I left questions at ] but he has simply blanked the page. Someone had better look through them all. Would you be prepared to do it, please? – ] '''<font color="#FF0000">]</font>'''] 22:15, 6 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Yes. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 22:21, 6 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Done. Hopefully it was done correctly and I didn't screw anything up :-) -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :{{smiley}} Thanks a lot! – ] '''<font color="#FF0000">]</font>'''] 08:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Please help == | |||
| Hi, on May 8 and May 9 you correctly intervened to stop this editor (http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:74.66.11.71) from inserting poorly sourced content that did not adopt a neutral tone into the article on Shael Polakow-Suransky. After several attempts by you and other editors the page was temporarily protected. Now it appears the same editor has returned and is using the signature Hashtag411, to insert the exact same content you removed a few weeks ago and has attempted to vandalize other parts of the page by removing large sections of sourced content. These attempts have currently been undone by other editors but someone with more experience may need to intervene again. ] (]) 12:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Reviewer granted == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. Your account has been granted the "<tt>reviewer</tt>" userright, allowing you to ] on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at ], while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at ]. | |||
| Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. | |||
| ''See also:'' | |||
| *], the guideline on reviewing | |||
| *], the summary of the use of pending changes | |||
| *], the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.<!-- Template:Reviewer granted --> — ] ] 04:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC) — ] ] 04:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you, ]. I appreciate the confidence and trust you've expressed in granting this permission. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 05:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for the heads up == | |||
| Thanks for the heads up about using the edit box. I have been trying to be more diligent in using it. However, I sometimes click save before I realized I have entered the information of the material I have added. :-) | |||
| I do have one question. Where did you find the info on Kevin Tighe's wife? I have not found a good source to cite that. Just curious. | |||
| Thanks again! | |||
| I am trying to understand your logic for the edits on Kevin Tighe's page. Can you clarify as they do not make sense on some levels. We got blasted by another bot for using IMDB.. Which means we have had to use other sources. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :My edits have been well explained in the edit summaries. The prose you have written is in many ways not encyclopedic in tone, there has been redundancy in content, some of it out of place, some of it extraneous, some of it just not encyclopedic at all. Some of it has been lifted from online sources (for example, "bohemian lifestyle"). I plan to further copy edit the article over the next several days, so working cooperatively on this is a must. IMDB is not a reliable source, it cannot be used. In the future, it would be best for you to question edits and rationale on the article's talk page. Thanks. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 04:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Just wanted to say that I apologize if edit summary comes off as rude. The actors and filmmakers project recommended avoiding "best known" for a number of reasons years ago. FWIW I am old enough to have watched ''Emergency!'' in its original run and, thus, was happy to see Kevin show up in ''Lost''. Thanks again for all you work with the Monterrosa sock situation earlier today. Cheers. ] | ] 04:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::It did come off as rude, but I'll get over it. I, too, am old enough to remember Emergency in its original run. I know better than to put in "best known", and must have been asleep at the wheel. Thanks for fixing it. You're welcome for the Monterrosa dealings, and thank you for being there to help with the needed reversions. While reverting him was certainly justified, I didn't want to get dinged for edit warring ("even if you think you're right"). Best, -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 04:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You are welcome as well. Best regards. ] | ] 05:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 18 June 2014 == | |||
| <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-06-18}} | |||
| </div><!--Volume 10, Issue 23--> | |||
| <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] (]) 00:59, 22 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| </div></div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=613149515 --> | |||
| ==BLP== | |||
| I appreciate your writing to me. I am, in fact, myself one of the "long-time editors" you speak of, having been on Misplaced Pages for nine years, so I've been well aware of ] policy for a very long time. I'm also aware of ], which stands for "bold, revert, discuss." Your interpretation of BLP is not universal, and to say, "This is the policy and I'm right and everyone else is wrong" really isn't the way Misplaced Pages prefers to handle differences of interpretation. | |||
| In this case, the information on the children is ''very'' reliably sourced, as the policy requires. I hope you're not suggesting that content sourced to Time Inc. publications like '']'' and '']'', to networks like ], to books, to newspapers and the ] is not being reliably sourced. | |||
| Second, this information is not based on anonymous, unattributed "sources" but on official statements by the parents and their representatives themselves, who are proud and happy to introduce their children to the world — some of them even do so on the ''covers'' of magazines. | |||
| This goes to a third point: When this kind of pertinent biographical material appears widespread in reliable sources cited in the articles themselves, it's unencyclopedic to try to hide and censor information that is readily available everywhere ''except'' an encyclopedia. And that ties in to a fourth point: Any professional biographer knows that a person's family is a vital part of a subject's life and biography — and this holds true even in cases that don't involve Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin naming their child "Apple," which sheds light on those particular subjects' beliefs, preferences and personalities. | |||
| And most important: When your bold edit is reverted, you are not supposed to ] by re-reverting. You're supposed to discuss the issue on the talk page. If you disagree with the way a discussion is going, you can call for mediation or a ]. But you do not edit-war to change stable articles and unilaterally declare that your way is the only way, end of discussion. | |||
| I'm going to start discussion on those three pages. I hope you will discuss. If not, we'll have to take this up with admins, I suppose. --] (]) 16:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I see you've removed talk-page comments by another editor who has an issue with your editing style. --] (]) 16:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| (edit conflict on my own talk page, how totally annoying) | |||
| Wow, ]. Your attempt at intimidation ("I'm one of those long time editors") and threats re: edit warring and involving administrators noted. I reverted because the articles in question are BLPs. I'll certainly discuss on the article talk page(s), but this may have to go to a noticeboard because I get the feeling you're going to insist on your interpretation of policy. Regardless, adding the names of those non-notable minor children do not enhance the reader's understanding of the article subject. | |||
| As far as removing comments from MY talk page, I remove stuff as I see fit and it has nothing to do with what you are implying (as if it's any of your fucking business). And if you keep this bullshit up on my talk page, I'll remove your comments as well. Simply because you're starting to really piss me off with your unproductive and uncivil high-horse attitude. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 16:34, 22 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 16:34, 22 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:53, 2 September 2022
Note
Not that it will make much difference in your day-to-day, but I've retired the "anti-filibuster" sanction that I placed on you in August 2018, so that no longer applies. The other sanctions are set to expire soon.
Unrelated, but I remember in the previous site-ban discussion MONGO proposed some sort of reverse topic ban where you'd limit yourself to editing only 5 articles. That might be a starting point for an unblock...getting those articles to GA with no drama could be used as evidence to appeal for a less restrictive ban. I dunno...maybe it's a bad idea, but it's a start. ~Awilley (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Unblock request closed
You have likely seen this already, but I should probably notify you that I have closed your unblock request as unsuccessful. Please read the comments there carefully before any subsequent requests. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
You have been mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Winkelvi&redirect=no Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Trump Baby Balloon at protest in Parliament Square.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Trump Baby Balloon at protest in Parliament Square.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 182.239.120.76 (talk) 10:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
If you are watching this page
Winkelvi - I think you should respond to the accusations of socking, especially if you are innocent. If you don't defend yourself, it will be assumed that you are guilty which makes it doubtful the community will allow you to return...provided you even want to return. j/s Talk 📧 15:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
: Even being completely truthful and saying it's not me, I'm pretty sure nothing I do at this point will mean squat. I recall being called a liar here numerous times, by regular editors and admins, when I wasn't lying, but being totally honest. I'm not wanted in Misplaced Pages, that's been plain since even before my indef, in addition to the subsequent denial of request to return, and now being "tried" and tagged as a sockmaster solely on circumstantial "behavioral" evidence by a relatively new editor and admin/CU with whom I've never interacted when I was editing. How anyone can believe they are knowledgeable of someone's behavior without ever experiencing that person's behavior is beyond my understanding and logic, but the result is what it is. Misplaced Pages as a mostly anonymous community has shown me it is unforgiving and the normal rules of the real world don't apply. Based on all that, I think trying to defend myself, drawing up a case, and being hopeful for a return to editing would be a complete waste of everyone's time and end only in disappointment for me.
I do thank you for caring, though. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 16:41, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- I am so sorry you left. You were my friend :( cookie monster (2020) 755 18:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Good thing that got cleared up. Some folks see the boogeyman under the bed, in the closet, behind the couch.--MONGO (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Winkelvi was mean to me during the sockpuppet investigation that got me blocked 4 years ago. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
😂 Second Skin (talk) 11:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
For the record, I object to any unblocking of this user! gidonb (talk) 21:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)