| Revision as of 06:48, 26 June 2014 editOllieinc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,312 edits Reverted to revision 572306795 by MiszaBot II (talk): Removing word salad entry. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:45, 7 October 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,025,694 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] | ||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{talkheader}} | {{talkheader}} | ||
| {{WikiProject banner shell| | |||
| {{WikiProject Computing}} | |||
| }} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | ||
| Line 9: | Line 12: | ||
| |archive = Template talk:Cloud computing/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Template talk:Cloud computing/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{AutoArchivingNotice|small=yes|age=30|bot=MiszaBot|botlink=User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo}} | |||
| == LogicWorks : notability? == | |||
| Noneil277 has been adding ] to this template, I've been reverting them. It's been going on long enough that someone else should review the situation. My issues with ] are | |||
| * Notability? Is it significant enough? Is it unique enough? We can't have a list of everyone here, so unless it is unique or very successful (hey, we don't have IBM's offering yet), I don't think it should go in. | |||
| * Quality of the ] article. It's written like an advert and much of the text appears to be a cut and paste job. | |||
| * Where is their API? The only discussion there is on API is that they host VMWare's infrastructure platform -but in that case, there's no uniqueness at all | |||
| == Adding Tsuru (PaaS) in the Platform session == | |||
| Comments from others welcome, including Noneil77. ] (]) 07:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Tsuru PaaS in getting momentum mainly in Brazil and in other countries as well, being a great open source platform, very easy to deploy and use <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ] (]) 19:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)SteveLoughran thanks for the feedback regarding Logicworks. | |||
| We are not using VMware infrastructure for our public cloud platform but rather CloudStack 2.2. | |||
| The full API documentation is here http://cloud.com/kb/cloudstack-22-documentation and on our website. | |||
| We are the only CloudStack infrastructure provider at this time running the latest release and to further expand on that capability the only provider of a public cloud which can hybrid multiple connections both virtual and bare metal into the same dedicated Vlan. | |||
| Currently we are also working with Rightscale providing autoscalling solutions to our infiniCloud (CloudStack) and its uniqueness with the push button serve and hybrid dedicated VLAN availability provide us with some winning attributes. We've added the capability of multiple networks within a virtual machine of our cloud. Another unique feature is our award wining managed services which provides many clients with help beyond the infrastructure but includes application uptime service level agreements. | |||
| While the QOS of our Logicworks company profile page is in the process of an update we have been working close with our marketing and engineering team to refresh and get the information in place. | |||
| If you have any concerns or doubts of our cloud we could set you up with a free account for testing purposes . <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:47, 14 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :: Yes, but are you notable enough to merit a mention on the template? You are certainly worthy of mentioning on the ], but I don't think you should go in this template. If we weren't ruthless, this template would be the same size as that list. It is not meant to be a complete list, more an example. ] (]) 12:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Can we please have similar template but only for ] and others? | |||
| ::: ] was deleted. -- <u style="text-decoration:none; font-family: papyrus;">] <small><sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub><sup><font color="green">]</font></sup></small></u> 20:44, 6 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| See ]. ] (]) 03:22, 31 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Adding cloud database under technologies == | |||
| == Adding MindSphere to the template == | |||
| I've written a new entry about ] and I think it fits under the technologies section in this template. What do you think? ] (]) 11:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :: Okay, adding ] under technologies. ] (]) 14:07, 11 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Hello fellow wikipedians. The ] was recently approved here on Misplaced Pages. The article is currently in the orphan stage. Thus I am adding it to related articles and here to the cloud computing template. I do work for Siemens, but the company is not endorsing me to edit Misplaced Pages. --]<sup>]</sup> 13:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == clean up == | |||
| == Providers scattered between Applications, Platforms, and Infrastructure == | |||
| I think it would be better to separate service providers from technologies. --] (]) 12:35, 14 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| We need to ... disambiguate which of the topics that the cloud providers belong in. Oracle Cloud is in all 3 of Applications, Platforms, and Infrastructure; GCP is in Infrastructure; AWS in Platforms and Infrastructure; Azure in Platforms... IBM in Infrastructure. Joyent and Rackspace and the other lower tier ones in Infrastructure. ] (]) 01:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Small number == | |||
| I agree I had been thinking about adding rclone to infrastructure but there seems to be some variation in the existing treatment of infrastructure, applications and platforms between different services listed here. ] (]) 11:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| The docs say this "should have a small number (5–10) of the best available examples of each layer. This results in having the major players being listed in the transcluded template, with lesser competitors receiving more prominence in articles' "See also" or "Competitors" sections. It's better to have just one list that is maintained centrally. If that means having forty names in the list, it isn't a great problem. Ideally the ] article would do the job, but right now it is so incomplete that it's almost useless. - ] (]) 15:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:45, 7 October 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cloud computing template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
 | This template does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Adding Tsuru (PaaS) in the Platform session
Tsuru PaaS in getting momentum mainly in Brazil and in other countries as well, being a great open source platform, very easy to deploy and use — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnotorres (talk • contribs) 00:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Template:Cloud storage
Can we please have similar template but only for Amazon Glacier and others?
See Category:Cloud storage. Ushkin N (talk) 03:22, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Adding MindSphere to the template
Hello fellow wikipedians. The MindSphere article was recently approved here on Misplaced Pages. The article is currently in the orphan stage. Thus I am adding it to related articles and here to the cloud computing template. I do work for Siemens, but the company is not endorsing me to edit Misplaced Pages. --Karen Tamrazyan 13:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Providers scattered between Applications, Platforms, and Infrastructure
We need to ... disambiguate which of the topics that the cloud providers belong in. Oracle Cloud is in all 3 of Applications, Platforms, and Infrastructure; GCP is in Infrastructure; AWS in Platforms and Infrastructure; Azure in Platforms... IBM in Infrastructure. Joyent and Rackspace and the other lower tier ones in Infrastructure. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
I agree I had been thinking about adding rclone to infrastructure but there seems to be some variation in the existing treatment of infrastructure, applications and platforms between different services listed here. Ed1964 (talk) 11:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Categories: