| Revision as of 04:53, 1 July 2006 editDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits →Demkina RFM: good idea← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:56, 6 June 2008 edit undoNick Graves (talk | contribs)4,593 edits redirect to current account | ||
| (97 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ==] to the ]== | |||
| Here are some links I thought useful: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The ] is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. | |||
| ]! | |||
| ] ] 14:22, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I've added a little reply on ] re: Baptists as Protestants. I agree it was wishy-washy the way it was stated, but the truth of the matter was lurking just below. The article text was ALMOST correct, just without making clear statements as to why. --] 05:28, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == || == | |||
| Thanks for your work on the Telecaster article! It's really strong now. ] 14:02, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello. I received your message on the above. Because you can assure that you will maintain the list, I will change my vote to keep and rename. ] 14:05, 19 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks for the ArbCom Vote!== | |||
| I wanted to thank my few "yes voters" in person...well, not in person, but at least contact you directly. Thank you for your vote, and for saying that you "liked me." It is appreciated. I love you. | |||
| ] 15:57, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you for voting! == | |||
| Hello there! I wanted to thank you for taking the time to vote on my arbitration commitee nomination. Although it was not successful, I appreciate the time you spent to read my statement and questions and for then voting, either positively or negativly. Again, thank you! ]</font> <sup><font color="ff66cc">]</font></sup> 22:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Great work on ]== | |||
| I was going to come back to it, I'd just restored the link to ] while I investigated what ''disregarding rhythm to rapidly produce pitches when musical notation calls for such a treatment'' was supposed to mean. I'm still not entirely sure. But you've addressed my concerns I think, and more. ] 18:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hi == | |||
| Wow... an American Baptist (minister?) from Cincinnati who plays a brass instrument? I'm starting to wonder if I know you. | |||
| ] 00:10, 24 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Mediation Case: <strike>The Humanist papacy</strike> == | |||
| Comments concerning this mediation case and the edit war leading up to it have been deleted. The matter is resolved. | |||
| == About Ricardo Lagos in List of Agnostic == | |||
| Absolutely it is confirmed ; Ricardo Lagos have been all his life AGNOSTIC. Everybody knows in Chile, he always has said it. Michelle Bachellet is agnostic too. I'am from Chile and I know what I write. Please it does not erase it!. ''(This unsigned comment was left by ])'' | |||
| == Demkina RFM == | |||
| {{RFM-Filed|Natasha Demkina|Natasha Demkina}} | |||
| Note: I know you're not involved with the article anymore, but I thought you might possibly want to be involved in RFM. Or not. I just felt you should be notified as a possible party. - ] ] <small>(])</small> 18:33, 14 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :If you're interested, I would appreciate your vote on the ] for the Natasha Demkina draft. Thanks! ] 17:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for voting! I was hoping to use Pravda.RU as a very limited source per ], for certain things I can't find anywhere else, but we know happened - for instance the trip to Japan. The limited use of Pravda.RU is for items detailed in ]. I hope you might reconsider your rejection! Thanks again! ] 04:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Great idea on moving the lengthy source discussion to a debate section! I was thinking of doing the same thing. The voting section has gone way past what I intended and it's now just a big blobby mess... ] 04:53, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:56, 6 June 2008
Redirect to: