Misplaced Pages

Talk:Madonna: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:31, 4 July 2014 editChasewc91 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,746 edits Requested move 8: r← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:20, 15 January 2025 edit undoLuca Bagnoli bis (talk | contribs)3 edits Argument for the inclusion of the Italian IPA pronounciation of "Ciccone": new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}} {{Talk header}}
{{American English}}
{{Article history|action1=RBP
{{Article history
|action1=RBP
|action1date=12:29, 19 January 2004 |action1date=12:29, 19 January 2004
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Archive/Refreshing brilliant prose - People and culture |action1link=Misplaced Pages:Archive/Refreshing brilliant prose - People and culture
Line 8: Line 10:
|action2=FAR |action2=FAR
|action2date=14:07, 28 Feb 2005 |action2date=14:07, 28 Feb 2005
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article removal candidates/Madonna (entertainer) |action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article removal candidates/Madonna
|action2result=demoted |action2result=removed
|action2oldid=10709573 |action2oldid=10709573


|action3=GAN |action3=GAN
|action3date=00:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC) |action3date=00:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
|action3link=Talk:Madonna (entertainer)/Archive 6#GA on hold |action3link=Talk:Madonna/Archive 6#GA on hold
|action3result=passed |action3result=passed
|action3oldid=184131144 |action3oldid=184131144
Line 20: Line 22:
|action4=PR |action4=PR
|action4date=23 March 2008 |action4date=23 March 2008
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Madonna (entertainer)/archive1 |action4link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Madonna/archive1
|action4result=reviewed |action4result=reviewed
|action4oldid=200310626 |action4oldid=200310626
Line 26: Line 28:
|action5=GAR |action5=GAR
|action5date=18:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC) |action5date=18:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Madonna (entertainer)/1 |action5link=Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Madonna/1
|action5result=kept |action5result=kept
|action5oldid=219115907 |action5oldid=219115907
Line 32: Line 34:
|action6=GAR |action6=GAR
|action6date=01:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC) |action6date=01:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
|action6link=Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Madonna (entertainer)/2 |action6link=Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Madonna/2
|action6result=kept |action6result=kept
|action6oldid=221044661 |action6oldid=221044661
Line 38: Line 40:
|action7=PR |action7=PR
|action7date=02:14, 5 August 2009 |action7date=02:14, 5 August 2009
|action7link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Madonna (entertainer)/archive2 |action7link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Madonna/archive2
|action7result=reviewed |action7result=reviewed
|action7oldid=306124275 |action7oldid=306124275
Line 44: Line 46:
|action8=PR |action8=PR
|action8date=03:00, 27 October 2009 |action8date=03:00, 27 October 2009
|action8link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Madonna (entertainer)/archive3 |action8link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Madonna/archive3
|action8result=reviewed |action8result=reviewed
|action8oldid=322094917 |action8oldid=322094917
Line 50: Line 52:
|action9=PR |action9=PR
|action9date=05:35, 17 March 2010 |action9date=05:35, 17 March 2010
|action9link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Madonna (entertainer)/archive4 |action9link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Madonna/archive4
|action9result=reviewed |action9result=reviewed
|action9oldid=349550065 |action9oldid=349550065
Line 56: Line 58:
|action10=FAC |action10=FAC
|action10date=10:26, 8 June 2010 |action10date=10:26, 8 June 2010
|action10link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Madonna (entertainer)/archive1 |action10link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Madonna/archive1
|action10result=promoted |action10result=passed
|action10oldid=366570220 |action10oldid=366570220


|action11=FAR |action11=FAR
|action11date=15:29, 15 May 2012 |action11date=15:29, 15 May 2012
|action11link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Madonna (entertainer)/archive1 |action11link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Madonna/archive1
|action11result=removed |action11result=removed
|action11oldid=492673433 |action11oldid=492673433
Line 68: Line 70:
|action12=GAN |action12=GAN
|action12date=15:39, 6 September 2012 |action12date=15:39, 6 September 2012
|action12link=Talk:Madonna (entertainer)/GA1 |action12link=Talk:Madonna/GA1
|action12result=listed |action12result=passed
|action12oldid=511083409 |action12oldid=511083409


|currentstatus=FFA/GA |currentstatus=FFA/GA
|topic=music |topic=music
|otd1date=2023-08-16|otd1oldid=1169277954
}} }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|collapsed=yes|class=GA|vital=yes|listas=Madonna|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-work-group=yes|filmbio-priority=Mid|musician-work-group=yes|musician-priority=top}}
{{WikiProject Business|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Children's literature|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Electronic music|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Feminism|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies}}
{{WikiProject Madonna|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Michigan|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject New York City|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Pop music|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Record Production|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Rock music|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=mid|USMusic=yes|USMusic-importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
{{WikiProject Women in Music|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Women in Business|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=low}}
}}
{{Press|collapsed=yes
|title=Lack of Women in Misplaced Pages|org=]|date=November 3, 2022|url=https://reporter.rit.edu/tech/lack-women-wikipedia
|title2=Misplaced Pages's most influential people|org2='']''|date2=June 10, 2014|url2=https://www.smh.com.au/technology/wikipedias-most-influential-people-carl-linnaeus-jesus-hitler-michael-jackson-20140611-zs39r.html
|title3=The most influential person on Misplaced Pages is someone you’ve probably never heard of|org3='']''|date3=June 11, 2014|url3=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2014/06/11/the-most-influential-person-on-wikipedia-is-someone-youve-probably-never-heard-of/
|title4=A Practical Approach to Language Complexity: A Misplaced Pages Case Study|org4='']''|date4=November 2012|url4=http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.251.3192&rep=rep1&type=pdf}}
{{Banner holder |collapsed=yes |1=
{{MadonnaRMArchive}}
{{annual readership}}
{{All time pageviews|76}}
{{Top 25 Report|Feb 8 2015 (11th)|Mar 8 2015 (23rd)}} }}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(90d)
|archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}}
|archive = Talk:Madonna/Archive %(counter)d
|counter = 24
|maxarchivesize = 100K |maxarchivesize = 100K
|archiveheader = {{tan}}
|counter = 16
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadsleft = 2
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Madonna (entertainer)/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I|age=30|dounreplied=yes}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=GA|filmbio-work-group=yes|filmbio-priority=Mid|musician-work-group=yes|musician-priority=top|listas=Madonna}}
{{WikiProject Madonna|class=GA|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Pop music|class=GA|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Electronic music|class=GA|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Rock music|class=GA|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject R&B and Soul Music|class=GA|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Michigan|class=GA|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject New York City|class=GA|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Kabbalah|class=GA|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject LGBT studies|class=GA}}
{{WikiProject Feminism|class=GA|importance=low}}
{{WP1.0|class=GA|importance=high|VA=yes}}
{{WikiProject Children's literature|class=GA|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject United States|class=GA|importance=mid|USMusic=yes|USMusic-importance=top|listas=Madonna}}
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=People|class=GA}}
}}
{{hidden infoboxes|title=Request for move history|
{{MadonnaRMArchive}}
}}

== Error ==

At the end of the section for Music videos there is an error. it says in May 2014 Rolling Stone magazine named her the 4th highest grossing touring act. It was in fact Billboard magazine who named her this! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{Done}}--] &bull; ] 22:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

== My OCD spellcheck ==

Under the vocal style & Instruments section, this phrase:

"After two decades, Madonna decide to perform with guitar again during the promotion of Music"

Should read:

"After two decades, Madonna decided to perform with guitar again during the promotion of Music"

...as the content of the paragraph is in the third person/past tense, "decide" should be "decided"

Cheers :) <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:26, 13 June 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Thanks for pointing that out! Correcting..... '''''] (] • ])''''' 06:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

== Most Influential Woman in History ==

http://www.evoke.ie/most-influential-women-in-history/ This is a huge accomplishment and needs to be added right away. Also Queen of Pop should be next to her name, just like Michael Jackson's. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 09:49, 13 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:No. Misplaced Pages page views are not means of popularity. —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 09:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
::I came across the article and immediately saw the lead with its superlatives: "unprecedented level of power," "Immense popularity" and so on. I'm going to trim the fawning portions, which (unsurprisingly) have no citations. Madonna is one of many singers but is not, as the article now implies, one of the greatest people who ever lived.] (]) 22:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
:::Thabks for the catch. Article does need POV cleaning. '''''] (] • ])''''' 23:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
::::Trimming =/= removing the whole block. I have reinstated it while deleting the non-neutral POV. Most of it is indeed critically discussed in the article body. Again, just to make it clear, I'm not for the fluffery that has seeped into this article in its legacy and other sections. But I'm against deleting whole blocks because of ]. And the edit by Catherinejarvis particularly seemed problematic because instead of finding an interim solution the user deleting the whole portion. I hope the user is careful from the next time though. —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 03:11, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

== Potential GAR ==

As the person who nominated this page for GA, I'm considering proposing it for reassessment as I think the problems of this page are worsening beyond belief. The was by no means perfect, but I believe it to be far more neutral than the current state of the article. The two worrying aspects are the lead and the Legacy section, which I think have been incrementally expanded into sections with fansite-like writing and lots of cut-and-stick quotations about how influential and amazing Madonna is. This isn't how an encyclopedia entry should read. I hope that editors can help facilitate a re-write of these sections, either formally in a GAR or informally through talk page discussion and general editing, or failing this, I think the article could be helped by copyedits from editors not interested in the subject. Regards, —'']'' | ] 15:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
:{{u|IndianBio}}: A while ago you said you would attempt a re-write of the lead in your user space, did you start anything? I think the article would greatly benefit from that. However, if you didn't get round to it then don't worry, I'm sure we can figure something out! —'']'' | ] 15:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
::I think the legacy section is what bothers me the most. The lead can be definitely tweaked but the legacy section is too much. Give me a week's time, I think I can work on it in my sandbox. This week I would be busy completing some other assignments I had planned. How does that sound? I do not think it warrants a GAR based on two overflowing sections though. Just pretty much pruning the weed. —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 15:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
:::GAR isn't quite needed, ]. I was thinking of touching it up in my own sandbox. Legacy is far too long. Taking a look at FA's such as ] and ], we should opt for three or four paragraphs at most. {{u|IndianBio}} can take the lead section. '''''] (] • ])''''' 15:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
:Great suggestions. The reason why I considered GAR is because I think this article suffers the same problems ] (and other female pop-singer BLPs) did. The GAR process on that article, which most (including myself) felt was initially unnecessary and drawn-out, nevertheless led to a much stronger article than existed previously, particularly as it attracted useful external opinion. However, I'd much prefer to not go through that process and you both seem confident that it's unnecessary, so we'll review it informally. I'll go through the rest of the article in the coming days for copy edits, fixes, formatting, etc. I'll also be on hand to assist either of you with the lead or legacy sections, so drop me a talk page note or a note here and I'll assist. {{u|IndianBio}}: Take as long as you like, the same to you {{u|XXSNUGGUMSXX}}, if we can complete this by early/mid July I think that would be great! Best, —'']'' | ] 16:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
::Okay great then, we will have a great team in making this perfect, and maybe FA worthy {{small|(just kidding)}} :D —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 16:30, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
:::No problem. I was thinking of taking to FAC eventually, but not for quite some time. I do think, however, it would be nice to have this as "Today's Featured Article" for her birthday some year. '''''] (] • ])''''' 16:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
::::{{ping|JennKR|XXSNUGGUMSXX}} lets say we start the trimming of the article here at ]? —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 03:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

== Bisexuality ==

Adding ]. From page 147 of ]: "Because Madonna has been frank about her bisexual nature". I'm surprised that this isn't mentioned in the article. Its mentioned in ] and its been brought up on these talk pages a few times before. ] (]) 17:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
:Actually holding back after finding the following quote from Madonna herself on page 66 of Madonna as Postmodern Myth: "Whether I'm bisexual or not is of no interest. My position on sexuality is that it is not necessary to have a position, whatever that may be, but it is necessary to be free to do what you want."

:Additionally the following excerpt from her 1991 interview with ] seems relevant.
::Madonna: It’s incredible. What I hope is — maybe I’m being too idealistic — that my movie changes things in Hollywood in that direction. But like anything, it’s slow progress, two steps forward, one step back. Even though I dealt with some other-than-heterosexual themes in “Justify My Love,” unfortunately some people just saw it in a superficial way and didn’t really want to deal with it.

::Advocate: Deal with what?

::Madonna: The sexual themes in it. It wasn’t just about me. It’s about life, about human nature. I think everybody has a bisexual nature. That’s my theory. I could be wrong.

::Advocate: Are you as kinky personally as your image makes you seem?

::Madonna: Well, what do you mean by kinky? I mean, I am aroused by two men kissing. Is that kinky? I am aroused by the idea of a woman making love to me while either a man or another woman watches. Is that kinky? Also, just because I’m presented life in a certain way doesn’t mean I do all these things. It’s just something I choose to express.

:What does everyone else think? I'm pinging lgbt@lists.wikimedia.org on this, not to ] but to get their opinion as some folks there might be more knowledgeable on the matter and have more sources in either direction than I do. ] (]) 17:12, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

== Requested move 8==
{{requested move/dated|Madonna}}

] → {{no redirect|Madonna}} – I'm aware that this is a perennial request and has been repeatedly shot down. The argument that frequently comes up is that ] and ] are more notable. However, the singer's page has been viewed in the last 90 days - about 4 times as much as Mary (where "Madonna" isn't even the common name, as shown by the title and the lead section of that article) and nearly ''19 times'' as much as the art. ] states, "A topic is primary for a term, with respect to usage, if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term." And I think it's pretty obvious looking at the stats that most of our readers are looking for Madonna the singer.

PRIMARYTOPIC also mentions long-term notability and educational/cultural significance, which I'm sure will be brought up in opposition to this request, but given that the common name for the mother of Jesus, by far, is Mary, and the pageview stats, I think listing the singer as the primary topic with a hatnote at the top linking to Mary and a disambiguation page would be the most appropriate choice. –''''']''''' (] / ]) 18:50, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


== Argument for the inclusion of "producer" in lead ==
*'''Support''' - Per ], Misplaced Pages should represent neutrality (no certain religion) and <u>worldwide</u> point of view. shows that more than 50 language-editions of Misplaced Pages use simply "Madonna" to refer the singer, including the world's most-spoken languages such as , , , and . Here in Asia, most people don't even know "Madonna" as the other name of Mary. ] (]) 23:26, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
:*So our current setup would be highly educational to most people in Asia. ] (]) 00:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
::*It is not appropriate to base primary topics on what ''some editors'' feel our readers should be educated on; it ''is'' appropriate to base it on what readers are most likely to search for. The cultural/educational significance part of PRIMARYTOPIC was addressed in the request. –''''']''''' (] / ]) 00:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


It is my opinion that Madonna's lead sentence should include producer, as she has produced every track on every album of hers since 1986, which marks 33~ years of her producing every song on every album of hers since her third record. This is very notable and should be included in her lead sentence.
*'''Oppose''' - (1) the "entertainer" (meaning clown? comedian?) is not more notable than all other uses combined, and (2) malformed request, this should be a multimove template to move ] to ]. (3) WikiProject Catholicism should be notified of this move request. ] (]) 23:50, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


Additionally, Babyface, who co-produced ] with her, said: {{tpq|"I don't believe anyone who's worked with Madonna would've made a great Madonna song if she hadn't been involved as a writer and producer. We wrote it together. We each brought lyrics and melodies, singing them back and forth. She also brought in the arranger for the strings, which sound amazing."}} https://ew.com/music/babyface-girls-night-out-favorite-female-collaborations-madonna-whitney-houston/ ] (]) 13:31, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
:*The article for Madonna the singer was viewed 2.43 times more in the last 90 days than everything on the current disambiguation page combined. That increases to 2.64 times when you omit the Beatles song ] (which is unlikely to be known as simply Madonna), and 2.84 when you also omit the other articles related to Madonna the singer (her debut album and the 2001 biography). So while the singer may not be more notable, she is ''clearly'' what people are searching for if they're searching for her page nearly 3 times as much as any other Madonna. And I requested the correct move; requesting ] be moved to ] would make it unclear which "Madonna" should be moved to the primary topic. This move implies that the current Madonna page will be moved to ]. –''''']''''' (] / ]) 00:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


:Not sure how relevant the Babyface quote is or how much weight that carries for including producer here. As far as I can tell, it was previously omitted because Madonna doesn't appear to get as much recognition for this as singing, movies, or even business ventures. However, over 30 years of production work is quite a feat, and I can't think of anybody else who consistently produced or co-produced their own tracks for that long. ] (] / ]) 18:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, this is clearly the most common term people are looking for when they search "Madonna". I agree with Bluesatellite on the DAB listing, though In ictu oculi has a point about informing WikiProjects about this. '''''] (] '''·''' ])''''' 23:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
::I would argue that notability wise, her work as a producer is more notable to her career than her acting, as her acting is mainly notable for the many misses in her film career. Whereas people hold her music in pretty high regard ] (]) 04:37, 4 December 2024 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 16 December 2024 ==
:*I will notify the Catholicism project in addition to the Madonna and music projects, so as not to ]. Any editor may feel to notify any other appropriate wikiprojects of this discussion. –''''']''''' (] / ]) 00:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


{{edit semi-protected|Madonna|answered=yes}}
::*Looks like In ictu oculi already got around to notifying WikiProject Catholicism. –''''']''''' (] / ]) 00:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Madonna has announced on 16th December 2024 that she will be releasing new music in 2025 with Confessions on a Dancefloor producer Stuart Price<ref>https://www.instagram.com/p/DDpfxnmS0_G/</ref> ] (]) 18:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
:Let's wait for further details on this before adding to the prose. That link just gives a vague description. ] (] / ]) 20:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
::I have rewritten it to remove any release information until there's more concrete information from the album's release cycle. —] <sup>] ]</sup> 19:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)


== Argument for the inclusion of the Italian IPA pronounciation of "Ciccone" ==
*'''Support''' Per the reasoning provided in the RM statement, this seems the primary article under the name "Madonna" an not Mary, Jesus' mother. —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 02:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


Hello there, Misplaced Pages users.
*'''Oppose''' Madonna is the mother of God. The primary topic is ] "Madonna" should redirect to that article, not (The Material Girl) Ciccone's. -- ] (]) 05:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
In my humble opinion, I think that it would be more correct to put the Italian IPA transcription of Madonna's surname, , as her family has got Italian roots (from a village in Abruzzo, more precisely), and so that would be the right way to pronounce her surname - and even, probably, more respectful to her family's history and to her fair amount of relatives who are still in Italy. Currently, the page only shows the American English IPA transcription of Ciccone, I think that the page should show the IPA transcription in both Italian and American English. ] (]) 01:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
:*Then why do people most often refer to Jesus' mother as "Mary" and not "Madonna"? '''''] (] '''·''' ])''''' 05:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
::*The mother of whose God? Do you think seven billion people on earth has ''the same'' God? Not even all Christians use "Madonna" to call ''their'' God's mother. Otherwise her page would be titled ], not ]. ] (]) 06:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
:::* Both of you are confusing the most common name for the mother of Jesus with what is the primary topic of Madonna. These are two separate issues. The primary topic of "name X" is not the same thing as the most common name of "topic X". These can be different, as illustrated by ] being the most common name, but the primary topic of ] is the same topic, even though it is ''not'' the most common name. We have ], but that doesn't occupy ] because it isn't the primary topic, but ] doesn't occupy ] either, because it isn't the most common name. This is the same case here. Mary, mother of God, is the primary topic, but the most common name for the topic is "Mary". -- ] (]) 06:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
::::*You're comparing a short-lived, relatively unsuccessful band to a woman who is not just a pop star, but one of the most famous and well-known musicians (and women, for that matter) in history. Madonna ''is'' a name for Mary the mother of Jesus, but it's not her common name. Not even close. –''''']''''' (] / ]) 16:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' this is a malformed request. Unless the nominator wants to merge the entire disambiguation page into a massive hatnote, this is missing the move request for the disambiguation page located at ] -- ] (]) 05:20, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. Misplaced Pages is not meant to be only for 2014 and a little longer. ''The'' Madonna is likely to be of interest much longer, as are Madonna and Child paintings. ] (]) 06:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
:*''The Madonna is '''likely''' to be of interest much longer'' -> ] or ]? This results indicate that the term "Madonna" has widely documented to the singer. ] (]) 06:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. Madonna the pop artist is a derivative of the original Madonna and making her the primary topic is just caving in to ] and pop culture. Maybe in 2,000 years time if the singer's still more popular, we should reconsider. --] (]) 07:30, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
:*There is no consensus that source material (or in this case, who one's name is based on) is automatically the primary topic. –''''']''''' (] / ]) 16:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' as pointy, tendentious, recentism. The English Misplaced Pages's usage is also in line with Oxford, MW, Macmillan. -- ] (]) 11:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. This is pretty much the textbook example of why the "greater enduring notability and educational value" criterion was added to PRIMARYTOPIC. ] (]) 14:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*'''Strong Oppose''' per Jenks24. Pageview statistics are flatly irrelevant in this case. The "greater enduring notability and educational value" criterion weighs incredibly heavily in favor of the Virgin Mary and artistic depictions of her. Mary is the actual PRIMARYTOPIC of the term Madonna. (Since supporters have suggested religious bias might play a role here, I'll add that I am a Buddhist, with no devotional attachment to the religious figure. My only attachment is to a love of history, and it is for that reason alone that I find this request galling and wrongheaded.) ] (]) 15:58, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
:*I have no doubt that Mary is more culturally and educationally significant than Madonna the Material Girl. But "Madonna" is not what she is commonly known by - Mary is ''by far'' her more common name amongst English speakers. Hence the proposal to mention Mary in a hatnote. –''''']''''' (] / ]) 16:31, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:20, 15 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Madonna article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Former featured articleMadonna is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleMadonna has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseKept
February 28, 2005Featured article reviewDemoted
January 14, 2008Good article nomineeListed
March 23, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 13, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
June 23, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
August 5, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
October 27, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
March 17, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
June 8, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
May 15, 2012Featured article reviewDemoted
September 6, 2012Good article nomineeListed
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 16, 2023.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconBusiness Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChildren's literature Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Things you can do edit
WikiProject iconElectronic music Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFeminism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
WikiProject iconMadonna Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Madonna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Madonna on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MadonnaWikipedia:WikiProject MadonnaTemplate:WikiProject MadonnaMadonna
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMichigan Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNew York City Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPop music Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRecord Production Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Production; a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's documentation of Record Production articles. Questions or comments related to record production and related articles are welcome at the project's talk page. Anyone interested may join the project: add your name to the list of project members!Record ProductionWikipedia:WikiProject Record ProductionTemplate:WikiProject Record ProductionRecord Production
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRock music High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Music Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject American music (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconWomen
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
WikiProject iconWomen in Music Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen in Business Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen writers Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
          Other talk page banners
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Logs and discussions:

Discussions:

This article has been viewed enough times to make it onto the all-time Top 100 list. It has had 76 million views since December 2007.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Argument for the inclusion of "producer" in lead

It is my opinion that Madonna's lead sentence should include producer, as she has produced every track on every album of hers since 1986, which marks 33~ years of her producing every song on every album of hers since her third record. This is very notable and should be included in her lead sentence.

Additionally, Babyface, who co-produced Take a Bow (Madonna song) with her, said: "I don't believe anyone who's worked with Madonna would've made a great Madonna song if she hadn't been involved as a writer and producer. We wrote it together. We each brought lyrics and melodies, singing them back and forth. She also brought in the arranger for the strings, which sound amazing." https://ew.com/music/babyface-girls-night-out-favorite-female-collaborations-madonna-whitney-houston/ PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 13:31, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Not sure how relevant the Babyface quote is or how much weight that carries for including producer here. As far as I can tell, it was previously omitted because Madonna doesn't appear to get as much recognition for this as singing, movies, or even business ventures. However, over 30 years of production work is quite a feat, and I can't think of anybody else who consistently produced or co-produced their own tracks for that long. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
I would argue that notability wise, her work as a producer is more notable to her career than her acting, as her acting is mainly notable for the many misses in her film career. Whereas people hold her music in pretty high regard PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 04:37, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 December 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Madonna has announced on 16th December 2024 that she will be releasing new music in 2025 with Confessions on a Dancefloor producer Stuart Price Finley 2009 (talk) 18:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Let's wait for further details on this before adding to the prose. That link just gives a vague description. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
I have rewritten it to remove any release information until there's more concrete information from the album's release cycle. —IB 19:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Argument for the inclusion of the Italian IPA pronounciation of "Ciccone"

Hello there, Misplaced Pages users. In my humble opinion, I think that it would be more correct to put the Italian IPA transcription of Madonna's surname, , as her family has got Italian roots (from a village in Abruzzo, more precisely), and so that would be the right way to pronounce her surname - and even, probably, more respectful to her family's history and to her fair amount of relatives who are still in Italy. Currently, the page only shows the American English IPA transcription of Ciccone, I think that the page should show the IPA transcription in both Italian and American English. Luca Bagnoli bis (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

  1. https://www.instagram.com/p/DDpfxnmS0_G/
Categories: