Misplaced Pages

User talk:ST11: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:04, 12 July 2014 editRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 editsm Reverted 2 edits by 174.236.99.0 (talk) to last revision by Ryulong. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:47, 16 December 2024 edit undoST11 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users13,710 edits clear 
(236 intermediate revisions by 69 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOINDEX__ __NOINDEX__
{{busy}} {{retired}}
{{talk header}} {{nobots}}
]


== Precious anniversary ==
== Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! ==
{{User QAIbox
| title = Precious
| image = Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
| image_upright = 0.45
| bold = ]
}}
Miss you! --] (]) 07:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


... six years now, all the best with your studies! --] (]) 07:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello StringTheory11, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found ''']'''. The competition will begin at midnight tonight (UTC). There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at ], and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in '''2014''' is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at ] for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on ]. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! {{user|J Milburn}}, {{user|The ed17}} and {{user|Miyagawa}} 17:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:J Milburn@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:J_Milburn/List&oldid=588548334 -->


== Precious anniversary ==
==Disambiguation link notification for January 5==
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}} --] (]) 07:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
:{{ping|Gerda Arendt}}, thank you. Hope all is well with you and everyone else here. Thought I might get back into Misplaced Pages during the pandemic, but instead I've been getting outside and exploring the mountains as much as I can. There's so much adventuring that I want to do while I'm still in my 20s and able to that there's no time for WP. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 04:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


{{-}}
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
== Precious anniversary ==

{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
enjoy the mountains! --] (]) 07:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

:{{ping|Gerda Arendt}}. Thank you! Trail running and skiing in the mountains are some of my favorite activities these days. Hope all is well. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 16:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
== Think we oughtta have a new category of WP:ELEM participants ==

We should have a special section for those that have been with the project for under a month. Currently they get dumped into "Inactive within the project", which while literally is certainly correct, somehow doesn't seem quite right... ] (]) 08:33, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
:Hmm, I like the idea of "periodic activity" (ba dum tsss) for those who have demonstrated a pattern of sporadic activity but don't really disappear completely. Thoughts? ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 03:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

== Re: Metal ==

Hello, I'm StringTheory11. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Metal because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

: The sentence I changed didn't (and doesn't) make sense to me. I thought there had been a mistake editing it and made a guess about the intended meaning. Can you think of another wording that makes the meaning clearer? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:27, 8 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::The problem is, the sentence doesn't really have anything to do with food, and instead is a general demonstration saying that metals are useful for a variety of tasks. There's not a specific reason to mention only food when we can mention a much broader variety of tools with "their". ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 17:32, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

:::Do you think you could rephrase the sentence in another way? Not necessarily in the article but just so I can understand what it is supposed to mean. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::::I personally think it's fine as is, but if you want to, you can add a referenced sentence that states how metals were used for food production. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 05:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

== New proposals at ] ==

Hello. Several new proposals have been submitted at ] since you last commented on it. You are invited to return to comment on the new proposals. ] (]) 01:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Jackmcbarn@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Pending_changes/Request_for_Comment_2014/Mass_message_recipients&oldid=590903159 -->
:Thanks, but I'm rather indiffirent or don't have the knowledge to vote on most of the later proposals, but I will oppose #4. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 01:29, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

== Request: peer review ==
Could you please help me out? I need someone who is an expert in chemistry and physics to help review an article on ]?. I do appreciate your kindest help. Thanks. ] (]) 19:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
:I'm afraid I'm not really an expert, but I'll try to remember to give it a look when I get a chance. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 19:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

== FA congratulations ==

Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of ] to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA you may have helped to write) appear as "Today's featured article" soon, please nominate it at ]; if you'd like to see an FA on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it to ]. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with 1,324 articles in ] at present, there's no telling how long – or short! – the wait might be). If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. ]] 10:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

== Nova Ophiuchi 1993 name ==

Hi, V2295 is called Nova Ophiuchi 1993 indeed, but so is called V2293 in some papers. Then, V2293 is also frequently called X-Ray Nova Ophiuchi 1993. Thus, I added "X-Ray Nova Ophiuchi 1993" as an alternate name to V2293, with the "X-Ray" prefix to distinguish it from V2295. Also, I added "This article is about" to both V2293 and V2295, given that in some places the name of V2295 refers in fact to to V2293. ] (]) 15:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
:That's a good idea, thank you for doing that! ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 16:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

== Main Page appearance: Perseus (constellation) ==

This is a note to let the main editors of ] know that the article will be appearing as ] on February 11, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask {{user|Bencherlite}}. You can view the TFA blurb at ]. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at ]. The blurb as it stands now is below:

<blockquote>
{{TFAIMAGE|Perseusurania.jpg|Perseus|size=133px}}
''']''' is a ] in the ] named after the ] hero ]. It was one of 48 listed by the 2nd-century astronomer ] and is among the 88 modern constellations defined by the ]. It is located in the ] near several other constellations named after legends surrounding Perseus, including ] and ]. The ] of the ] passes through Perseus but is mostly obscured by ]s. The constellation's brightest star is the yellow-white ] ], which shines at ] 1.79. It and many surrounding stars are members of the ]. The best-known star is ], an ] linked with ominous legends because of its ], which is noticeable to the naked eye. Other notable features in Perseus include ] (a binary system containing a ]), ] (a ] that peaked at magnitude 0.2 in 1901), the ] (comprised of two open clusters near each other in the sky), and the ] (a massive galaxy cluster). Perseus also hosts the ] of the annual ] ]. {{TFAFULL|Perseus (constellation)}}
</blockquote>
] (]) 23:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
{{clear}}

== A cheeseburger for you! ==
]
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I admire your commitment to scientifically oriented articles. Thanks Stringtheory11. ] (] &#124; ]) 05:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
|}
:Thanks! Now where's the mustard to go with this...a burger is nothing without it! ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 05:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
::{{done}} :-) ] (]) 11:58, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi
|doc=yes
|User=ТимофейЛееСуда
|1=t
}} 16:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

== WikiCup 2014 January newsletter ==

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the ''']''' for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Godot13}}, whose set of ], the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|12george1}} and {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|TropicalAnalystwx13}} were the first people to score, for the good article ] and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Sven Manguard}} scored the first ITN points for ].
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|WonderBoy1998}} scored points for an early good topic, finishing off ].
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|TheAustinMan}} scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on ].
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Igordebraga}} has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance ].

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in ]; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Misplaced Pages's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on ]. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on ], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from ].</small> ] (] • ]), ] (] • ]) and ] (] • ]) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:J Milburn@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=593471938 -->

== Your ] nomination of ]==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! <!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi
|doc=yes
|User=ТимофейЛееСуда
|1=t
}} 20:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

{{Did you know nominations/Caelum}}

==DYK for Caelum==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that when astronomer ] originally charted the constellation ''']''', it was recognized as an "engraver's chisel"?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 06:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

== Precious ==

<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 60em; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 )}} {{border-radius|1em}} border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix">
<div>
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; background-color: #ddd; border: 5px solid #ddd; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}} {{border-radius|0.5em}}">]</div>
'''elements and constellations'''<br />
Thank you for quality articles in astronomy and chemistry, from elements such as ] to constellations such as faint ] and ], often done in collaboration, for gnomish work in the field as an article guardian with {{diff|Perseus (constellation)|589060340||caution}}, and for listing "to do" before achievements on your user page, - you are an ]!

--] (]) 07:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
</div></div>
:Thank you! ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 00:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for February 14==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

== WikiCup 2014 February newsletter ==

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Godot13}}, a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Misplaced Pages. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in ].
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Adam Cuerden}}, a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist ]'s work.
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|WikiRedactor}}, another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include ], '']'' and ].

Other competitors of note include:

*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Hahc21}}, who helped take '']'' through good article candidates and featured article candidates, claiming the first first featured article of the competition.
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Prism}}, who claimed the first featured list of the competition with ].
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Cwmhiraeth}}, who takes the title of the contributor awarded the highest bonus point multiplier (resulting in the highest scoring article) of the competition so far. Her high-importance ], now a good article, scored 108 points.

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on ]. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on ], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from ].</small> ] (] • ]), ] (] • ]) and ] (] • ]) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:J Milburn@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=596449695 -->

==Disambiguation link notification for March 22==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:56, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

== FA review? ==

Hello StringTheory11,

I wanted to let you know that the article ] is currently a featured article candidate. Back in October, you gave a very helpful review of the article on the ], so I thought you might be interested in reviewing this one as well.

Thanks for your time,

] (]) 17:45, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
:I have quite a few tasks I'm currently working on right now on wiki, so it may be a while before I get around to it, but I'll try to give some feedback. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 23:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

::Thank you for your interest. I really appreciate it. ] (]) 20:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

== Glad someone did this.... ==

Was thinking of doing myself at some point given the rarity I see them referenced or discussed....] (] '''·''' ]) 01:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
:Yeah, I'm not sure I've actually ''ever'' seen one (apart from ]) used in literature. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 01:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
::Another great thing about removing Gould from the list is that it makes the designations go in roughly order of precedence (Bayer > Flamsteed > variable > Draper > Hipparcos). ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;])

== thanks ==
Well, if that's the case, I'll start doing what you just did using the WP:NASTRO reason. ] (]) 04:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
:That would be much appreciated. We had a few incidents where a bot and a few users created a huge number of non-notable asteroid stubs, and the cleanup of redirecting all of them is a very long process that requires the help of lots of users. The cleanup's been going on since 2011 in on and off spurts mostly. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 04:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
::I have a question, though. I noticed that the entry in the list (e.g. ]) links to the stub, and since I am redirecting the stub to the list, I will be creating a loop. Should I remove the link to the stub to avoid this loop? ] (]) 05:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
:::It's fine to have the link...no need to make extra work. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 05:40, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

== R136a1 ==

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/Blue_dwarf_(red_dwarf_stage), a blue dwarf star is the hypothesized remnant of a red dwarf star. The universe is currently too young to have any. I changed the text to match the size of the image in the picture and to match the description on the image's page (http://en.wikipedia.org/File:The_sizes_of_stars.jpg). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:There's two different meanings of the word "blue dwarf" in astronomy. One is the hypothetical stage you mention. However, hot B- and O-type main sequence stars are also referred to as "blue dwarfs", which is what the image is referring to. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 21:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
::Then the description on the image's page was wrong. I just corrected it. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::Perhaps it would be more permanent if you changed it. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::Done. On another note, to link to various articles, you don't have to type in the entire URL as I see you've been doing; instead, you can use notation such as <nowiki>]</nowiki> to link to various pages onwiki. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 01:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

== WikiCup 2014 March newsletter ==

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Godot13}} (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for ], an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Adam Cuerden}} (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from '']'', an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Sturmvogel_66}} (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured ]. {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Cliftonian}}, who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article ].

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on ]. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on ], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from ].</small> ] (] • ]), ] (] • ]) and ] (] • ]) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:J Milburn@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=602021125 -->

== Sorry.... ==

For - I think this one is notable - weird spectrum variations and some of the refs might talk of it in some detail. Corvus was a small constellation I thought of buffing for GA/FA as well...so would be definitely including it there. ''(I wonder how many of the 88 constellations have an R- star that is a Mira variable....)''] (] '''·''' ]) 07:35, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
:Yeah, it is certainly borderline; there's no doubting that (of course, I'm generally more deletionist than you, so yeah). I don't think I'll pursue it any farther. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 01:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
::I'm thinking rhe Mira variables are often mentioned in astronomy guidebooks as they vary so much in magnitude so make good objects of interest for beginner astronomers ] (] '''·''' ]) 04:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Hey, thanks for the support on the cleanup of dubious/disproven exoplanet articles. Much appreciated! ] (]) 19:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
:No problem. If you need any more help with this type of thing, just let me know. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 01:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

== Note to self... ==

Comment on Jakec's FAC. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 04:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

== WikiCup 2014 April newsletter ==

Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Adam Cuerden}} was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from '']'', lithographs of various warships (such as ]) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Godot13}}, whose featured list ] contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|ChrisGualtieri}} who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including ], on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Cliftonian}}, who saw three articles (including the top-importance ]) through featured article candidacies, and {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Caponer}}, who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated ]) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include ] from {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Reid,iain james}}, ] from {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Cwmhiraeth}} and '']'' from {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Igordebraga}}. We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Czar}} and {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Red Phoenix}} for their work on the ]. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on ]. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on ], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from ].</small> ] (] • ]), ] (] • ]) and ] (] • ]) 17:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:J Milburn@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=605564250 -->

== Fishing Creek FAC ==

Hi. Just wondering if you were still planning on reviewing ]? --] (]) (]) 01:28, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
:Sorry; I've been really busy lately; I'll get to it later today! ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 18:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

== Enquirer → Inquirer ==

Just ran into one of your edits and looked to see who had the clever name. Then saw your Sagan quote at the top and wanted to let you know that per the magazine name was '']''. Keep up the good work. <span style="background-color:#B7D9F9;border:solid 0px #0E5CA4;padding:0px 3px;border-radius:3px">]&nbsp;<span style="border-left:1px solid #0E5CA4;padding-left:3px">]</span></span> 03:04, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
:Done, thanks for the note! ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 05:59, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

== Reminder ==

Add ] to Caelum. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 05:59, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

== ] ==

I'm just the slightest bit worried about my description of Caelum and Grus, so I thought I'd best ask you and Casliber to review my descriptions. The praise of you two stays, though. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 22:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
:Oh, one other thing - is the Urania's Mirror illustration any use for illustrating Caelum in the Signpost, d'ye think? If the Grus historical image was a bit better photographed, I'd use that, but I kind of like to use slightly better images. I suppose there's the spare tire nebula, but that's maybe too tangental. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 22:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
::Your blurb looks fine to me, although admittedly I'm not a regular reader of The Signpost so I don't really know the norm. I think that the ''Urania's Mirror'' image is more focused on the other constellations on the card and thus isn't really the best for this purpose, although I think that ] would do quite well for this purpose. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 03:56, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
:::Hmm. If we didn't have all the other articles, I'd say yes, but as it is... Mind you, I do have a scan of the Uraniometria. Might just grab an image from that. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 18:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
]
...Yeah, I cheated. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 22:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

== FA congratulations (again) ==

Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of ] to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA) appear as "Today's featured article" soon (either on a particular date or on any available date), please nominate it at ]. If you'd like to see an FA appear on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it to ]. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with about 1,307 articles ], there's no telling how long – or short! – the wait might be). If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. ]] 18:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
:Thank you! I'm not proposing Caelum for TFA because it's really not that important of a constellation, and I think there's other things that are more worthy of being on the main page, although I don't mind at all if you just choose it. However, once I finish ] (and when I finally get started on ]), I'll definitely propose it for TFA. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 23:23, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

== Speedy deletion declined: ] ==
Hello StringTheory11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''The reason given is not a valid ].''' Thank you. —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 14:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
:With all due respect, I believe that in this case, pointing to the rules to decline the nomination is not within the best interests of WP. The article is 100% ''wrong'', plain and simple; see the discussion on ] for the background. I believe that in this case ] tells us to just delete the article as soon as possible, because all it is doing is misinforming people. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 17:06, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
::I don't entirely understand the discussion at ], but I can follow enough to see that it should be gone. Would you like me to leave it as a redirect, or delete it altogether? —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 17:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
:::I think that deleting it all would make more sense. I'm not a fan of redirecting to pages when an article should exist on the subject (and it should in this case), since seeing a bluelink instead of a redlink discourages article creation, I've found. In addition, if a simple redirect is created, the wrong content can still be seen in the page history. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 17:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
::::{{done}} —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 17:15, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
:::::Thank you! ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 17:24, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

== Brighter than the maximum ==

I'm writing a program that catches more errors that a quick eyeball check.

Is there a good reason for variable stars to be brighter than the maximum? I could mark them all with {{tl|Contradiction-inline}}, but it happens so often that I wonder if V<sub>max</sub> means what I think it means. For instance in ], BS Vul has a visual magnitude of 10.08 and a V<sub>max</sub> of 10.9 (and it can't mean maximum magnitude number, because V<sub>min</sub> is 11.6.) ] (]) 20:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
:The discrepancies come from when the V-magnitude listed in SIMBAD is not in the range of the V-magnitude listed on AAVSO. In general, what I do in such cases is if the listed magnitude is below or above the range, I adjust it to the closest value in the range. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 20:55, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
::I was about to edit the listed magnitude accordingly in a case like that one, but then I realized I would be exchanging one inconsistency for another.

::When absolute magnitude and distance are specified, consistency with visual magnitude is among the problems I test for, and it would become wrong if I changed the visual magnitude only. Since I'm doing that calculation anyway, it would be easy to change the absolute magnitude or distance to match, but which one? If the absolute magnitude is calculated from the distance and parallax, then I should change the absolute magnitude. But if it's a Cepheid variable for instance, the distance can be calculated from the absolute magnitude not vice versa, so the distance and not the absolute magnitude should be adjusted - or are there any stars on the list far enough to be measured that way?

::Or I could just leave them marked as inconsistent ... ] (]) 22:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
:::I think that it would be best to calculate distance from absolute magnitude. The measured period is extremely unlikely to be wrong, while it is definitely possible for the measured parallax to be inaccurate, as seen by the multitude of stars with negative parallaxes. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 22:41, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
::::, and will be repeated on similar pages. ] (]) 00:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
:::::Sigh - the other time-consuming way to clarify discrepancies is read a helluva lot of arXiv material.....] (] '''·''' ]) 02:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
::::::Although arXiv is unfamiliar to me, it doesn't keep asking my non-existent university for money, and thus I followed it far enough to conclude that it does explain ]. The answer is: Change both absolute magnitude and distance in ], which are unreferenced – and the WR 46 article's absolute magnitude -7.05 is also wrong. It's referenced, but the reference doesn't say -7.05. It does say DM (which apparently stands for ]) is 13.05, so absolute magnitude is 10.8-13.05=-2.25. That figure is consistent with 4070 parsecs and apparent magnitude 10.8. Nothing else matches, so that must be it. ] (]) 07:09, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
:::::: ] (]) 17:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
:I just finished prepping the Carina list for the major edit over the next few days...wow WP sure had a lot of stuff at wrong titles. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 03:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
::One of the details of was changing the V386 Car magnitude from 5.14 to 5.64. I reverted to 5.14 because it must have been some kind of typo (SIMBAD for instance says 5.17). Judging by where you moved it in the sort sequence, you intended 5.15 or 5.16 which would be fine. ] (]) 12:45, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
:::Oh yeah, meant 5.15, I think. Stupid 4 key being next to the 5 key! ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 23:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

== Re. Your post on Casliber's talk page ==

I was just checking to see if a discussion had been initiated with ] about his full protection of ], and I noticed that you had asked him if you would fare well at ]. Now keep in mind, I have only performed a cursory review of your contributions &mdash; editing stats, activity levels, block log (which of course is empty), and your talk page (excluding the archives) &mdash; so I can't really describe this as a thorough assessment. Nevertheless, based on what I've seen, I think you would stand an ''excellent'' chance of being granted the sysop toolset. You've been here for about four years now, have over 10,000 edits to your name, a large chunk of mainspace contributions, you seem to know your way around the place, and you come across as a very approachable editor. I'd say go for it! You'll definitely have my support. ] ] 04:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
:Thank you! ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 00:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

{{ ombox
| style = width: 90%; margin: auto; background-color: #fffaef; border: 1px solid #999
| image = none
| text = '''] would like to nominate you to become an administrator.''' Please visit ] to see what this process entails, and then to accept or decline the nomination. A page {{#ifexist:Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/StringTheory11|has been created|will then be created}} for your nomination at ''']'''. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
}}<!--- Template:RfA-nom --->
:::...and we're off! ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 02:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

== Re: Merge ==

Thanks! If you wouldn't mind also doing ] as well, would be much appreciated. ] (]) 17:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
:{{Done}}. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 17:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
::I also question the utility of even having a ] article in the first place. The ] article is completely adequate for presenting all of the information that is currently there. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 17:15, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
:::Yeah, I tend to agree. It's a bit weird to see objects like ] getting their own articles when arguably more-important objects like ] or ] are consigned to sections. ] (]) 18:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
::::But OMG it has exoplanets, it must be the most important thing ever!!!!!11!!11ONE!1!!! Well yeah, I agree, and will probably start a merge discussion tomorrow when I have more time. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 18:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
:::::Yes, and no planet claim is too tenuous to get its own mention because OMG PLANETS... I've found that going through the list of {{tl|OrbitboxPlanet hypothetical}} transclusions is a wonderful way to find extremely dubious articles. ] (]) 18:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
::::::I've started a merge discussion for Gliese 667 C. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 18:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

== WikiCup 2014 June newsletter ==

After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Godot13}} was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C, {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Casliber}} finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance ]. Third place was Pool B's {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Sturmvogel_66}}, whose contributions included featured articles ] and ]. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.

The round saw this year's first featured portal, with {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Sven Manguard}} taking ] to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|12george1}} and the ]. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on ] from {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Figureskatingfan}}, a good article on the noted Czech footballer ] from {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Cloudz679}} and ], freely released due to the efforts of {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant5|Sven Manguard}}.

The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from ].</small> {{user|J Milburn}} {{user|The ed17}} and {{user|Miyagawa}} 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:J Milburn@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=615048244 -->

== Your request for adminship ==

Hello StringTheory11, I have closed ] as successful. Congratulations for this result.

As you know, you had a significant amount of non-trivial opposition. While your request reached consensus, my advice to you in response to the concerns is that you take things slowly at first and never hesitate to ask for help, be it from people you highly respect and trust or even from people who opposed your candidacy. As per usual, the ] is worth a read and ] is most certainly available if you feel that you might require some practice with the tools in a safe environment prior to applying them elsewhere.

Now that all that is out of the way, good luck with your adminship! ] 02:00, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

*Congratulations, String! Keep up the good work. ] (]) 02:03, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*Congrats! now where were we with the constellations......] (] '''·''' ]) 02:08, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*:Delivery ! your equipment has arrived. I'll just set it over here in a corner. Congrats ! <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 02:13, 4 July 2014 (UTC)]
*Looked similar to my own, so I can empathize. Next week, if you are wanting input on mentoring, I would be willing to assist Secret in any way. Congrats to you. ]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;] 02:16, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

*Welcome aboard! ] 02:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
:* And I see you already made your first admin action. ] 04:42, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*Congrats! Looks like you have a mop, now all you need is to use it on {{=D}} <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 03:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*Conga rats! --]] 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
]
* Congratulations! I got you your uniform as well. — ''''']''''' <sup>]</sup> 04:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
* Congratulations are in order, and thank you for being patient with the RFA process :-) ] ] ߷ ] 04:39, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
* You demonstrated the uncommon but expected grace under pressure you'll need going forward. Well done. ] (]) 04:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Appreciate the answers to my numerous questions. I apologize for not asking them earlier. ] (]) 06:15, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

*See? What did I tell you? ;-)
:Congratulations on your successful request for adminship! ] ] 07:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

*Well done - enjoy the mop! <span style="text-shadow:#194D00 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em" class="texhtml">] ]</span> 10:25, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

*Good luck! ]<sup> ]<span style="color:red">★</span>]</sup> 15:02, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

* Am I suposed to be wearing a uniform? I have been in my pyjamas this whole time! ] 16:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

*Congratulations on your display of grace under pressure (the most important attribute, IMO, in an admin and one that's hard to learn) during an RFA as tough as my own :-). Nothing you do with the mop will be as difficult as this past week. All the best, ]] 17:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
**Thank you all! I promise not to blow anything up! ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 17:16, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
**I think Joe Decker's post wins the award for funniest thing throughout this whole process. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 17:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*Congrats! ]] 18:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
*Well done, have a night off and chill out. The most difficult week of your life is over (unless you go for RfB later...) ]<sup>]</sup> 19:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
:* Most difficult week of his life? RfA is bad but I am sure there have been tougher weeks. ] 14:54, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
:*Congrats, I trust you will not blow everything. {{P|;)}} ''']''' 08:03, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
*Congratulations! ] (]) 14:17, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
*You're an admin now?!?!? Crap, where are the keys to the bomb shelter? Just kidding. Congrats. :-)—] ]<sub style="margin-left:-4.2ex;color:olive;font-family:Comic Sans MS">Online</sub> 15:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

== VA/E question ==

Hi! Do we need to list ], ] and ] separately, or could we replace them all with ], which isn't currently listed? ] (]) 01:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
:I think ] by itself would be fine; it leaves room for more articles. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 01:16, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
::OK, I opened the ]. ] (]) 01:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

==DYK for Slowly pulsating B star==
{{tmbox
|type = notice
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that ''']s''' change in shape, not volume, as they pulsate?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Slowly pulsating B star|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Slowly pulsating B star|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], , )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> ] (]) 11:33, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

== AFD Mentoring ==

Curious if you had given any thought to starting. I believe {{u|Secret}} offered to help with that, which is an excellent choice as he has a tremendous amount of experience at AFD, and in my opinion, a very balanced perspective. ]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;] 19:41, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
:Sure, I'd be willing to start next week, if that's fine with {{ping|Secret}}. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 19:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
::I would be happy to ride shotgun with Secret in the driver's seat, although my hours are hit and miss. As I've said before, I've been here before, so pretty familiar. Just as with myself and CSD, it is all about getting a comfortable groove around where community consensus lies, nothing major. ]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;] 19:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
:: My hours has also been hit or miss lately because of promotions at work, though Monday I should close an entire day worth of AFDs with rationales to start you off, and you could follow along. I recommend starting with the obvious deletes/keep closures (five plus comments of keep/delete without an opposite rebuttal). Let me know when you want to start. Thanks ] <sup>]</sup> 00:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
:::I'm fine with starting Monday or Tuesday of next week, if that's fine with you. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 00:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

== ] ==
Hello, stringtheory. The page in question has been warred over several times. We attempted to add the title of next season but ] reverted them. I have cited three sources on the talk page, but I'm sure that RL will be tempted to revert that as well. Looking at the page's edit history. It seems that RL reverts virtually every edit he doesn't agree with (Like and ) -- especially from IPs like us. Therefore We requested a pending changes protection so the the IP edits that are vandalism can be rejected and the ones in good faith can be accepted without an edit war breaking out. ] (]) 02:57, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
:Let's see what happens after talk page discussion before any action is taken. Hopefully a resolution can be amicably reached there. Basically, you made a ] edit, it was ], so now ] is the next step for now. ] (]&nbsp;•&nbsp;]) 03:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
::I hope a resolution can be reached peacefully. RL has a of accusing IPs of trolling and harassing him when he deal with edits to pages he thinks are his. I'm sure he'll respond here as well, but feel free to discuss on the talk page if it's too much on your own talk page. ] (]) 03:24, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
:::The next season's title is not relevant to the article at this time. And the new episode that had been added is not properly sourced. There is no entry for it on the citation that was provided. I explained this in edit summaries on the article and on the talk page of one of the IPs used by this individual in this dispute. I don't see why he's referring to himself as a plural "we" here either.—] (]) 03:32, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
:::You know what? This is all just the guy who operated ] come back to cause more disruption and generally revert me to try to get me in trouble. This range . There's probably a narrower one but I haven't re-discovered it yet.—] (]) 03:47, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:47, 16 December 2024

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.

Precious anniversary

Precious
Five years!

Miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

... six years now, all the best with your studies! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt:, thank you. Hope all is well with you and everyone else here. Thought I might get back into Misplaced Pages during the pandemic, but instead I've been getting outside and exploring the mountains as much as I can. There's so much adventuring that I want to do while I'm still in my 20s and able to that there's no time for WP. StringTheory11 (t • c) 04:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Eight years!

enjoy the mountains! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt:. Thank you! Trail running and skiing in the mountains are some of my favorite activities these days. Hope all is well. StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Category: