| Revision as of 01:35, 16 July 2014 editSue Rangell (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,776 edits →Please comment on Talk:Lana Del Ray (album)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:34, 30 November 2024 edit undoFlightTime (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors157,522 edits User hasn't editing in over ten yearsTag: Undo | ||
| (120 intermediate revisions by 37 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|date=August 15, 2014}} | |||
| {{User:Sue Rangell/Templates/background}} | |||
| {{UserStatus|User:Sue_Rangell/Status}} | {{UserStatus|User:Sue_Rangell/Status}} | ||
| {{WikiWitch-icon|extra_offset=0}} | {{WikiWitch-icon|extra_offset=0}} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no|<small> | |||
| {{Archive box collapsible|image=File:Crystal Clear app file-manager.png|search = yes | |||
| |<small> | |||
| *] (March 2007 to December 2010)</small> | *] (March 2007 to December 2010)</small> | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service == | |||
| == Non-Admin Closures == | |||
| ====Reminder: ] is <u>''not''</u> policy, it is only an essay. My closures follow ] (actual policy), thank you.==== | |||
| '''Please place your complaints here. It appears that no matter how an AfD is closed, it will offend SOMEBODY, therefore please place your complaints below. I will read them all, but I will not respond to them if they are rude. I am also likely to ignore your <s>threats</s> helpful comments and advice if your own closures are regularly up for deletion review... <u>I do not take a simple head count of the !votes, I consider consensus and Misplaced Pages policy.</u> I close Afds that are ] keeps. Or if they are hopelessly locked, with three or more relistings, as ]. If they have less than three listings, I relist. If I closed a 20 day old hopelessly deadlocked discussion as "no consensus", please do <u>not</u> accuse me of doing a NAC on a "controversial" thread, as obviously there was no consensus, and it was wasting everyone's time, and needed to be closed.''' --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 18:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| '''Hi {{safesubst:<noinclude />BASEPAGENAME}}!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the ], but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over three years. | |||
| ::I have undone your NAC as it met none of the criteria listed in the appropriate conditions for a NAC. Please review ] and restrict yourself to appropriate cases where appropriate. ] (]) 04:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::*You are free to do so of course, but I think it's a big waste of time. There is no chance of it being deleted. I closed it as "no consensus" because there isn't a consensus, nor will relisting likely result in a consensus, as it has already been relisted... In the interests of saving a lot of people a lot of time, I hope you will reconsider, but if not, it will most likely be closed as "No Consensus" anyway. Be well. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">] ]</span></span> 04:30, 5 January 2013 | |||
| :::::::You were wrong sue. The article was closed by an admin as a Keep. ] (]) 01:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::*There is no right or wrong. ''No need for drama''. "No Consensus" defaults to "Keep", so there is no real difference in how the article was closed, just a (very slight) difference of opinion between the closing admin and myself. Since the nominator was angry at my closure for not DELETING it, I am sure the backlash would have been considerably more had I closed it as a Keep, rather than "No Consensus". Either way, the article still stands. It was not deleted. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 01:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::: Let me say this another way: You were unable to see the consensus that was right in front of you. ] (]) 01:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::* Let me say '''THIS''' another way... I don't like drama. I try to be very friendly to everyone that I meet on Misplaced Pages. The last thing I want to do is quibble with somebody, on my own talk page, the difference between a "No Consensus" and "Keep". It is the tiniest of judgment calls. The absolute tiniest. Other than what you are doing here, you seem like a very nice and rational person, so I am willing to discuss this trivial matter with you, but I will not muddy up my own talk page with it. This discussion must continue on your talk page, thank you. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 02:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::No Thanks.I have made my point ] (]) 02:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::* Very well then, I appreciate your input. Happy editing! --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 02:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more. | |||
| ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. —] (]) 02:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| *result was {{AN3|nv}} | |||
| :...per ], I should think, considering how fast they threw the complaint out. Please, for the love of Pete, stop wasting everyone's time, and learn how Misplaced Pages works, how to work collaboratively, and particularly what a revert is. Thanx. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 22:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| '''You do not need to do anything about this''' - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so: | |||
| == Request for comment == | |||
| # Go to the ]. | |||
| {{Info|I've made a request for comment on the page ]. If you could add your opinion, I'd really appreciate it. Thank you. ] (]) 15:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| # Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the ] and/or ] headings. | |||
| :{{Done}} --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 20:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| # Paste {{tlx|1=Frs user|2=<nowiki>{{subst:currentuser}}</nowiki>|3=''limit''}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where ''limit'' is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month. | |||
| # Publish the page. | |||
| If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way. | |||
| == Thank you - from N4 == | |||
| Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead. | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for your help with the RfC! ] (]) 03:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on ], or on ]. '''Thank you!''' ] (]) 21:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Stop now == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:CAPTAIN MEDUSA@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Naypta/FRS_pruned/May_2020&oldid=959250819 --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Sue, the ] article, which your immediately preceded Lightbreather's is one of the most blatant examples of following a user I've ever seen. If you do not stop reading Lightbreather's contribs and following them around, you'll find yourself blocked. See ]. This is the very definition of your activities with respect to Lightbreather. Whether or not you feel they are a POV-pusher and SPA, you've failed to gain consensus several times that their editing is problematic. I understand your concerns with Lightbreather, I know you have strong feelings about them, but reading their contributions is inappropriate. In addition, we have no rule about not removing content unless we have consensus. In fact, the ] says the exact opposite. Editors do not need to seek consensus before removing content from an article.--v/r - ]] 18:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] <small> (]) (]) </small> 15:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Since when is a single edit considered Wikihounding? Her edit triggered a notification, and so I went and checked it out. ], I do not follow lightbreather's contribs and edit them. I just looked at her recent edits since, and she has made something like 500 edits since I last interacted with her, and on various articles, none of which have been followed by me at all. On the other hand, apparently if I make a single edit that Lightbreather doesn't like, I get threatened by you. Who is doing the ] here? Do this again, and it will be *me* who complains. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 19:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place to determine if the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ::ADDENDUM: After this post I gave myself a voluntary interraction ban from lightbreather, and stopped editing any pages where she was involved. To anyone reading this, Lightbreather has since gotten herself topic banned all on her own. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 00:43, 14 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| == Notice == | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] <sub> '']''</sub> 08:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. v/r - ]] 20:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| :Ya'll (Lightbreather and Sue Rangell) both appear to be valuable long term contributors to Misplaced Pages based on your edit count. I'm not; I'm essentially a wiki-rat that lurks in places like ANI (like 2,000 edits last I checked). I've seen enough to know that when an editor gets dragged into ANI thread, their primary goal should be to get out of as soon as possible. The ''best possible outcome'' is for the two of you to work it out somewhere other than ANI (like someone's user talk page). If you can do that without getting onto each other's nerves please do so. Suggestion is to forget who said what to whom in the past and figure out how to go forward. I've seen lots of interaction bans end up going south and they're just aggravation you guys don't want unless its absolutely necessary. <small>]</small> 19:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| ::Taking others' good advice, ], please let's bury the hatchet. Here is my offer to you. I will voluntarily avoid articles that fall under the WikiProjects you belong to, which appear to be: Computer Security, Sociology, Universities, if you will voluntarily avoid articles under WikiProjects that I belong to, which are: Firearms, Journalism, Law, and Politics. (Actually, you only need to avoid articles in Law and Politics that cover Firearms or Journalism.) If one of us accidentally edits on another's turf, the other will AGF and give a friendly warning. Is this agreeable to you? ] (]) 19:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| :::You've pulled me into ANI something like five times. How about if we just let other editors of the article decide when someone needs to go to ANI?? --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 19:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::''Three'' times: First, for WP:OWN: I named three other editors and ''possibly'' you. Second, for possible 3RR. Third, for DISCUSSAFD. How many times have you proposed or suggested, at ANI or on talk pages, that I be topic banned? ... | |||
| :::::Apparently I haven't been the only one making the suggestion. You have managed to get yourself topic banned without any help from me. I hope that your topic ban will give you time to reflect on your actions. When that happens, I will be very happy to edit along side with you once again. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 00:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == I like your signature. == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| Would you mind if I take your signature code and customise it for my own? --] (]) 08:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">] ]</span> 22:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :THANK YOU! By all means feel free, and I am honored! --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 19:34, 20 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == ''Gun control'' arbitration proposed decision == | |||
| Hello. You have participated in the ], or are named as a party to it. Accordingly, you may wish to know that the committee is now voting on its decision for this case. The decision is being voted on at the ] page. Comments on the decision can be made at the ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ] ]] 11:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion review for ] == | |||
| == humor article == | |||
| An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRV notice --> ] (]) 08:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Dear Editor, I realize that there is a possibility that I am taking things too seriously but I have been troubled for a long time by a humor page in your user domain. I am familiar with the generally inviolable protocol of leaving the contents of a user's page to the individual contributor. Nevertheless, I redacted the page in question. You may take it that this is my way of indicating to you that you may wish to remove the page altogether or on the other hand may wish to change it back to the way you had it originally. I've decided to disengage from further interaction or editing of the page in question. I do express the hope that you do not return it to something that spoofs a sister project. I suspect that many of that project's editors have put a lot of work into the work product. Again, I'm going to defer to you entirely on what you want to now do with this page. As I said, I'm letting the page in question drop off my concern radar now, hoping that you will take into account this concern. With my regards. ] (]) 05:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, since you were part of ] for this article, and since nothing much has changed, I do hereby invite your participation in ]. Thanks ] (]) 08:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| Your edits to my user page have been noted. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 05:08, 22 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Some baklava for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hi Sue, Thank you for your comments in the recent ARE proceeding. My apologies if I ruffled any feathers or brought up any bad memories. I should have given you more of a head's up when I involved you in the fray. But I know that you have shared my frustrations. I hope all is well with you otherwise... :) ] - Just your ] banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... ] 18:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ::THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH! You did me a favor. I have never had so much trouble with an editor in my entire time on Misplaced Pages, and I have been on for a very long time. That editor is the ONLY editor that I actively avoid. Please feel free to ping me anytime she drags you (or anyone else) into ANI, so that whoever she is picking on will know that they are not alone. Eventually (I Hope) the powers-that-be will wake-up to her behavior and finally do something. Thank you again. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 19:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ugh, now LB is dragging you into the fray. Not very civil behavior for someone who accuses so many of being uncivil towards her. I've asked for permission so that I can comment on your behalf. I'm also asking why her personal attack on me during the ARE was not addressed. --] - Just your ] banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... ] 19:06, 14 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your request for rollback== | |||
| ] | |||
| Hi Sue Rangell. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have <span class="plainlinks"></span> rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: | |||
| *Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing ]. | |||
| *Rollback should be used to revert ''clear'' cases of ] ''only'', and not ]. | |||
| *Rollback should never be used to ]. | |||
| *If abused, rollback rights can be revoked. | |||
| *Use common sense. | |||
| If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see ] (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my ] if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ] (]) 00:24, 14 July 2014 (UTC)<!-- Template:Rollbackgiven3--> | |||
| == Request for enforcement == | |||
| I have made a request for enforcement against you at ARE: ] (]) 13:47, 14 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::(sigh...) You just did this with Scalhotrod. This has become boring. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ff55ff 0em 0em 0.8em,#55ffff -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#ffff55 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#ffffff">] <span style="font-size: 16px;">]]</span></span> 00:25, 15 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:34, 30 November 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Sue Rangell has not edited Misplaced Pages since August 15, 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
offline
 | Welcome to my talk page.
|
| Archives |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 41.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service
Hi Sue Rangell! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over three years.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
- Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
- Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
- Paste
{{Frs user|{{subst:currentuser}}|limit}}underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month. - Publish the page.
If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of St. Stephen's Secondary School (Bowmanville) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Stephen's Secondary School (Bowmanville) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/St. Stephen's Secondary School (Bowmanville) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 15:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Aaron, South Carolina for deletion
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Aaron, South Carolina is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aaron, South Carolina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hog Farm Talk 08:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Nomination of Moulton-Udell High School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moulton-Udell High School is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Moulton-Udell High School (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The Banner talk 22:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Felony Flats (2nd nomination)
Deletion review for Duncan Harrison
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Duncan Harrison. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. JakeH1108 (talk) 08:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, since you were part of the original AfD for this article, and since nothing much has changed, I do hereby invite your participation in this discussion again. Thanks Excelsiorsbanjo (talk) 08:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Categories: