| Revision as of 21:02, 31 July 2014 editN-HH (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,142 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:11, 1 August 2017 edit undoN-HH (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,142 editsNo edit summary |
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Userboxtop}} |
|
The main reason Misplaced Pages is so unreliable as a resource and badly written is not the drive-by vandalism but because around 50% of the regular content editors and the administrators are morons; many of them morons on a mission to tell the world about how great or terrible something or someone is. If you think it's painful reading WP pages, try editing them. |
|
|
|
{{User:WereSpielChequers/Userboxes/Greater London}} |
|
|
{{Template:user Adult}} |
|
|
{{Userboxbottom}} |
|
|
|
|
|
An occasional contributor, mostly copyediting and trying to apply at least some common sense and/or perspective to talk pages. Experience suggests that trying to do much more than that is usually futile when faced with those with more time and commitment to their particular causes. If you like arguing with the stubborn and the stupid, it can be fun. Not sure I do though. |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Collapse|The main reason Misplaced Pages is so unreliable as a resource and badly written is not the drive-by vandalism or joke edits by IP editors but because so many of the account-holders and regular content editors are basically ignorant about the areas they contribute to and have no idea how to read and research topics or to construct readable, coherent, concise and genuinely impartial encyclopedic content. And of course some of them aren't even here to try to do that anyway, but instead actively view this place as a playground for scoring political points. |
|
|
|
|
|
This is meant to be an encyclopedia rather than a place to tell the world about either how great or how terrible you think a particular political ideology, artistic endeavour, individual or nation is. Too many people can't tell the difference and often seem to think that a page here can only be "neutral" if it happens to tally with the way that they see the world and will only be "properly sourced" when it relies on sources and commentary favourable to that worldview. |
|
|
|
|
|
Reading WP pages can be painful enough, but trying to make even marginal improvements to them in the face of the above is even harder work.|A short essay, for what it's worth ...|bg=#C0C0C0}} |
An occasional contributor, mostly copyediting and trying to apply at least some common sense and/or perspective to talk pages. Experience suggests that trying to do much more than that is usually futile when faced with those with more time and commitment to their particular causes. If you like arguing with the stubborn and the stupid, it can be fun. Not sure I do though.
