Revision as of 10:42, 30 August 2014 editFunkMonk (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers102,765 edits →Discussion← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:01, 13 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,781 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Syrian civil war/Archive 53) (bot | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Skip to talk}} | |||
{{central|Template talk:Syrian Civil War infobox}} | |||
{{Talk header|search=no }} | |||
{{pbneutral}} | |||
{{ |
{{Controversial}} | ||
{{censor}} | |||
{{Talk header |search=yes }} | |||
{{Not a forum}} | |||
{{Syrian Civil War sanctions}} | |||
{{Calm}} | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes| | |||
{{Round in circles}} | |||
{{WikiProject Syria |class=C|importance=Top}} | |||
{{FAQ|page=Talk:Syrian civil war/FAQ|quickedit=no|collapsed=no}} | |||
{{WikiProject Arab world|class=C|importance=High}} | |||
{{Article history|collapse=yes | |||
{{WikiProject Military history |class=C |B1=yes|B2=no|B3=yes|B4=yes|B5=yes |Middle-Eastern=yes}} | |||
|action1 = PR | |||
|action1date = 17 January 2012 | |||
|action1link = Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Syrian civil war/archive1 | |||
|action1result = reviewed | |||
|action1oldid = 468924745 | |||
|otd1date = 2016-03-15 | |||
|otd1oldid = 709827657 | |||
|otd2date = 2019-03-15 | |||
|otd2oldid = 887764721 | |||
|itn1date = 20 March 2011 <!-- oldid 419814236 --> | |||
|itn2date = 26 March 2011 <!-- oldid 420764675 --> | |||
|itn3date = 31 March 2011 <!-- oldid 421590505 --> | |||
|itn4date = 9 April 2011 <!-- oldid 423114623 --> | |||
|itn5date = 21 April 2011 <!-- oldid 425131716 --> | |||
|itn6date = 23 April 2011 <!-- oldid 425438659 --> | |||
|itn7date = 26 April 2011 <!-- oldid 426053777 --> | |||
|itn8date = 13 November 2011 <!-- oldid 460438957 --> | |||
|itn9date = 16 July 2012 <!-- oldid 502569666 --> | |||
|itn10date = 6 May 2013 <!-- oldid 553719726 --> | |||
|itn11date = 25 July 2018 <!-- oldid 851921041 --> | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|collapsed=yes|vital=yes|1= | |||
{{hidden infoboxes|title=In the News| | |||
{{WikiProject Arab world|importance=High}} | |||
{{ITN talk|3, 4 February; 8, 15, 16, 18 – 31 March; 1 – 8, 10, 11, 13 – 20, 22 – 24 April; 13 November|2011}} | |||
{{WikiProject History|importance=High|Contemporary History=y|Contemporary history-importance=High}} | |||
{{ITN talk|16 July|2012}} | |||
{{WikiProject Germany|importance=High}} | |||
{{ITN talk|6 May|2013}} | |||
{{WikiProject International relations|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Iran|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Iraq|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Islam|importance=High|Islam-and-Controversy=y|Salaf=y|Shia=y|Sunni=y|Shia-importance=Mid|Sunni-importance=Mid|Salaf-importance=Mid}} | |||
{{WikiProject Israel|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Assyria|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Kurdistan|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Military history|class=B|B1=yes|B2=no|B3=yes|B4=yes|B5=yes|Middle-Eastern=yes|Post-Cold-War-task-force=yes|Russian=y|German=y|US=y|European=y}} | |||
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low}} | |||
{{WikiProject Russia|importance=High|hist=y|mil=y}} | |||
{{WikiProject Syria|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Turkey|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject United States|importance=High|USMIL=yes|UShistory=yes|UShistory-importance=high}} | |||
{{WikiProject 2010s|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Human rights |importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors |user=TheWikiToby |date=10 December 2024}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Copied|collapse=yes | |||
|from1 = Syrian Civil War | |||
|to1 = 2012–13 escalation of the Syrian Civil War | |||
|to_diff1 = https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2012%E2%80%9313_escalation_of_the_Syrian_Civil_War&oldid=782084114 | |||
|date1 = May 24, 2017 | |||
|from2 =Syrian Civil War#Timeline | |||
|from_oldid2= https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Syrian_Civil_War&oldid=876432615#Timeline | |||
|to2 =Timeline of the Syrian Civil War | |||
|diff2 =https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Timeline_of_the_Syrian_Civil_War&oldid=8767450434 | |||
|date2 =4-10 January 2019 | |||
}} | |||
{{Gs/talk notice|scwisil}} | |||
{{info|'''Consensus required:''' All editors must obtain ] on the talk page of this article before reinstating ''any edits that have been challenged (via reversion)''. If in doubt, don't make the edit.}} | |||
{{Old moves|list= | |||
{{anchor|Old moves}} | |||
* RM, Syrian civil war → Syrian Civil War, '''Not moved''', 17 July 2023, ] | |||
|oldlist= | |||
* RM, Syrian uprising (2011–present) → Syrian Civil War, '''Not moved''', 9 June 2012, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian uprising (2011–present) → Syrian Civil War, '''Not moved''', 2 July 2012 ] | |||
* RM, Syrian uprising (2011–present) → Syrian Civil War, '''Moved''' to <u>Syrian Civil War (2011–present)</u>, 15 July 2012, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian Civil War (2011–present) → Syrian civil war, '''Moved''' to <u>Syrian Civil War</u>, 23 July 2012, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian Civil War → Syrian civil war, '''Moved''', 6 August 2012, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian civil war → Syrian Arab Spring war, '''Not moved''', 7 September 2013, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian civil war → Syrian Civil War, '''Moved''', 24 November 2013, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian Civil War → War in Syria, '''Not moved''', 5 November 2015, ] | |||
* ], Syrian Civil War → Syrian civil war, '''Moved''', 14 May 2016, | |||
* RM, Syrian civil war → Syrian Civil War, '''Moved''', 24 May 2016, ] | |||
** MRV of 24 May 2016 RM, '''Relisted''', 1 June 2016, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian Civil War → Syrian civil war, '''Moved''', 22 June 2016, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian civil war → Syrian Civil War, '''No consensus''', 18 August 2016, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian civil war → Turco-Syrian war, '''Not moved''', 27 August 2016, ] | |||
** MRV of 22 June 2016 RM, '''Overturned''', 27 August 2016, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian Civil War → Syrian civil war, '''Moved''', 15 January 2020, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian civil war → Syrian Civil War, '''Procedural close''', 30 January 2020, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian civil war → Syrian Civil War, '''Procedural close''', 19 May 2020, ] | |||
* RM, Syrian civil war → Syrian Civil War, '''Not moved''', 11 February 2021, ] | |||
}} | |||
{{Banner holder|collapsed=yes|1= | |||
{{Top 25 Report|collapse=yes|Aug 25 2013|Sep 1 2013|Sep 6 2015|Dec 11 2016|Apr 2 2017|Feb 25 2018|Dec 1 2024|Dec 8 2024}} | |||
{{split article|from=Syrian Civil War|to=Syria and weapons of mass destruction|diff=//en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Use_of_chemical_weapons_in_the_Syrian_civil_war&diff=559789557|date=23:30, 13 June 2013}} | |||
{{Annual readership}} | |||
{{central|Template talk:Syrian Civil War infobox}} | |||
{{tfd end|date=26 August 2013|result=keep|Template:Syrian civil war infobox}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{old peer review|archive=1}} | |||
{{Split from|page=Syria and weapons of mass destruction|diff=//en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Use_of_chemical_weapons_in_the_Syrian_civil_war&diff=559789557|date=23:30, 13 June 2013}} | |||
{{Auto archiving notice |bot=MiszaBot I |age=14 |units=days }} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 53 | ||
|minthreadsleft = 4 | |minthreadsleft = 4 | ||
|minthreadstoarchive = |
|minthreadstoarchive = 2 | ||
|algo = old( |
|algo = old(14d) | ||
|archive = Talk:Syrian |
|archive = Talk:Syrian civil war/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes}} | |||
{{round in circles}} | |||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | |||
{{Archives|title=Topical archives|search=no| | |||
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes | |||
* ] | |||
}} | |||
* ] (]) | |||
{| class="infobox" width="270px" | |||
* ] | |||
|- | |||
* ] | |||
!align="center" |]<br>] | |||
* ]}} | |||
---- | |||
|- | |||
==FAQ: infobox== | |||
| align="center" |<big>'''Topical archives'''</big> | |||
|- | |||
<!-- ] 00:30, 29 July 2034 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|2037745853}} | |||
| | |||
*<big>]</big> | |||
{{archive top}} | |||
**<big>]</big> | |||
*<big>]</big> | |||
'''Question''' | |||
*<big>]</big> | |||
|} | |||
Why is the infobox short? Where is the information about belligerents and other information commonly seen in an infobox? | |||
{{tfd end|date=26 August 2013|result=keep|Template:Syrian civil war infobox}} | |||
'''Answer''' | |||
{{tq|The Syrian civil war is an ongoing multi-sided conflict in Syria involving various state-sponsored and non-state actors.}} <small></small> | |||
Previously, this article had a very long infobox, which attempted to capture the complex relationships between the many belligerent parties in this civil war and present other information such as strengths and casualties. | |||
An RfC was held proposing a substantially shorter version as we now see (]). | |||
To summarise some key points, an infobox is a simple, at-a-glance summary of key points from the article. It is unsuited to capturing nuance and complex information. Quoting from ]: | |||
:{{tq|The less information that an infobox contains, the more effectively it serves its purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance.}} | |||
The consensus of the RfC was for the substantially shorter version of the infobox. | |||
{{archive bottom}} | |||
== Issues == | |||
<!-- ] 05:33, 26 April 2030 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1903412003}} | |||
The whole article needs a rewrite, it for example lists allied forces as bellingerents. And it's locked so that nobody can actually do anything to deal with its problems.<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
:I suppose that just as consensus can change, so can allies change. Feel free to use {{t|Edit semi-protected}} here to suggest specific edits. – ] (]) 01:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
:Indeed, needs to be re-written. Starting with the title that reads "CIVIL" war. When foreign forces unlawfully invade and annihilate your country, it is not a civil war. It is a hostile and aggressive attack we call today terror. Calling it a "civil" war is a misleading political statement. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 09:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::It's quite common for foreign forces to intervene in a civil war. That doesn't (necessarily) change the internal aspect of the war. — ] (]) 08:19, 24 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
::I would support the notion that this was not a civil war but a proxy war. Mercenaries, foreign or national, fighting a proxy war for foreign powers, paid, armed and guided by those foreign powers, among which the CIA, do not qualify as a local uprising and part of a civil war. ] (]) 17:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::For the people who are defending USA and NATO, USA with the help of turkey, they posioned syrian civillians by dropping posion gas from airplanes. If that is not a war crime then I do not know what is. ] (]) 21:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
::I think that even the title - Syrian Civil War - is misleading and should be changed. This is corroborated by people here and by information, that is increasingly available, not least the continuation of the proxy war between the USA and Russia in Ukraine. A proxy war opposing armed gangs managed by foreign powers and a national army is not a civil war, even though it apparently is among national parties. The "conflict in Ukraine" as it is called by the OHCHR<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://ukraine.un.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/Conflict-related%20civilian%20casualties%20as%20of%2031%20December%202021%20%28rev%2027%20January%202022%29%20corr%20EN_0.pdf |title=Conflict-related civilian casualties in Ukraine |date=27 January 2022 |publisher=] |access-date=22 November 2023 |url-status=live }}</ref> is quite similar and is named on Misplaced Pages as "]" described, without further proof as follows: "The war in Donbas, or Donbas war was a phase of the Russo-Ukrainian War in the Donbas region of Ukraine." This could also be said of the war in Syria, which could be named the "War in Syria", a "phase of the proxy war of the USA and Russia, opposing US mercenary groups assisted by US and US ally troupes and the Syrian army with Syrian allies (Russia, Iran, Hezbollah)". The war in Syria actually is not over, with the USA illegally occupying the north-eastern part of the country, i.e. the oil fields of Syria, producing oil on its own account without permission from the national government. Nothing is "civil" there. Misplaced Pages shouldn't get involved in politics and have only one standard, in this case applied to all conflicts alike, without distinction of who is waging them. ] (]) 10:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
:Agreed. There is a sentence in there saying that the Syrian Civil War "...started nine years ago..." This page needs work. ] (]) 04:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Well said. ] (]) 11:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{reftalk}} | |||
== Status of War RFC == | |||
<!-- ] 01:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1736730075}} | |||
Is the Syrian civil war over? ] (]) 00:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:No. I'm pretty sure what's happening right now is still civil war material, mostly due to ISIS and the Kurds. Although, my question is, is this the end of this FIRST Syrian civil war, and a new one began? Or is it just a new phase? ] (]) 00:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I would say no. There is no end in sight for violence in Syria, especially with the ongoing fight for Manbij, and it remains to be seen if the new government will actually be stable enough not to immediately descend into civil war once again. I’m not sure who edited the article to say it ended today, but I’d wait until a stable government has been established before any drastic changes are made. ] (]) 01:00, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Agreed. And I reverted the inaccuracy on the infobox, it's way too early to tell. ] (]) 01:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::As of this comment, the result parameter is used not status parameter for ] See this edit - ] (]) 03:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I would disagree theres no end in sight, given Assad has fallen there is very much an end in sight if the rebel groups can come to agreement. But I do think its too early to say its over now ] (]) 01:41, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:No. The rebels might start fighting each other so for now its still going ] (]) 01:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:'''Comment''' (not a vote): I don't know a whole lot about the war myself, but if it now only involves people from other/outside countries, then wouldn't this technically be no longer a civil war (i.e. "just a war")? — ] ] 03:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:It is not over '''YET'''. ] (]) 03:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:an important competitor in the Syrian civil war which is rojava does still exist and still fighting in manbaj so it should be ongoing but with adding the information that says Assad regime has fallen or maybe as long nothing is clear for the aftermath of this offensive let's just leave it empty untill something happens ] (]) 06:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Basically Not Yet''' - We rushed to ] and that was a mistake (albeit one that ultimately didn't make too much difference). I'm of the same opinion here: let's have some reliable sources saying it's over before we declare it over based on our own assessments. ] (]) 13:26, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Not over.''' I agree it is not over. if the various opposition groups, factions, and militias do not have any conflicts at all after today, it will be a miracle. i think we need to keep covering this for a while.*:] (]) 14:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:'''Yes'''. The war aim is to overthrow Assad regime since the beginning. It should be declared as over on December 8, 2024. For post-war conflicts, a new article should be created (e.g. ]) like ] and ]. ] (]) 01:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::the war aim for each group in a war, is to win the war. the different factions are already fighting to win power from the others. ] (]) 02:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
*This is becoming an issue. People are inserting into the info box "Syrian Opposition victory" despite the infobox claiming the war is ongoing. ] (]) 19:05, 10 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:That may be appropriate for ] but on this page is the open question. ] (]) 20:19, 10 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:'''No'''. There is still fighting between HTS and SDF. In any case we shouldn't hurry but rather wait for RS to assert this. ]<sub>]</sub> 21:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Not over''' - Initially, the civil war was only against Bashar al-Assad but there are too many factions for years now who are currently almost as dominant as Assad's regime once was. - ] (]) 03:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:'''Wait''' we can’t say for sure yet ] (]) 05:33, 11 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Not yet''' Per the title, the scope of the article is civil warring in Syria. While/if internal fighting continues between different factions after the fall of the Assad government, then ''ipso facto'' the civil warring continues. The lead tells us that such factional fighting is within the scope of the article. Most crucially though, the civil war is over when good quality sources explicitly tell us it is - noting that ] sources are qualified as sources (see also ]). ] (]) 02:13, 12 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:* '''No''', there's still fighting between various Islamist forces and Kurdish forces. | |||
:] (]) 21:16, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Too soon to know.''' I think there isn't any objective measure or historian consensus as yet, and it would seem ] for us to make a determination and declare it in WP. Cheers ] (]) 05:55, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Semi-protected edit request on 25 December 2024 == | |||
== Color Revolts and US involvement in maintaining civil unrest == | |||
{{edit semi-protected|Syrian civil war|answered=yes}} | |||
Given that US involvement in supporting Color Revolts is well recorded, and considering the evidence that - far from 'freedom-loving' home grown protesters - it the US that helped start and maintain the Syrian Civil War, would not section on this be helpful in understanding the conflict? ] (]) 13:09, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Dear Misplaced Pages Editors, | |||
: if you have material you think is important for the article, and reliable sources, then you add it to the article, I believe that is the idea of Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 20:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
*It has been well known for years that the US funded opposition groups and their propaganda long before 2011. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/wikileaks-us-secretly-backed-syria-opposition/ and http://gulfnews.com/news/region/libya/us-document-reveals-cooperation-between-washington-and-brotherhood-1.1349207 ] (]) 21:28, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
::foreign plots. I mean I believe mossadeq in iran was targeted , i'm sure the world is a very cynical place - (except the pure Assad regime, and saint Vladimir Putin Russia regime and (not at all shiapriestriddenIran , they don't act other than in a saintly way of course , never any chicanery there obviously) - -so just add what you believe is important to add with RS. just do it with a bit of honesty in your mind and ask yourself - are you being critical minded in a non biased wp:NEUTRAL way or are you out to highlight any POINT-y material that exists anywhere that supports a assad regime narrative that you embrace- assad regime hafez-bashar always argues its only critics are all foreign puppets, no? ] (]) 23:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::Oh, and the peaceful uprisings in Bahrain and Eastern Saudia are the only real foreign plots, right Sayer? Evil Iranian Shia plots! Not to forget the uprising in Eastern Ukraine, where civilians are being mercilessly shelled. But I guess lives are worth nothing when they are anti-western. Oh, and if the dictator is Saudi funded, as in Egypt. Not a single noise from you about those, Sayer. ] (]) 02:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::No we are not arguing that only pro-western rebellions are legitimate, what we are arguing is that just as the west has there own bias the Russians do too and that parroting the Kremlin's propaganda is no different than parroting Washington's propaganda. Your entire view of this war seems to revolve around two ideas: firstly that all western sources are biased and secondly that only Russian sources are objective. No noise comes from Sayer about anti-western uprisings, however the ONLY noise that comes from YOU about pro-western uprisings is that they are all a foreign plot devised by the evil westerners. To this accusation you declare that your sources are unbiased Russian propaganda is more truthful than western propaganda. Why? Because Russian propaganda told you so! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:::::So where have I even once cited a Russian source? Is gulfnews.com Russian propaganda? Keep useless knee-jerk accusations out of this, and deal with the facts. Funny how quiet this page has become, by the way. ] (]) 02:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
@ funkmonk - this cartoon can help explain to you the quiet maybe ] (]) 16:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Still no sight of the "big terrorist" among the Bahraini protesters... Hasn't sped up western intervention, funnily enough, and the world has long forgotten. ] (]) 18:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::: ] (]) 07:58, 18 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::Oh, ''this'' Kenneth Roth? ] (]) 14:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::: you change the subject - ] card] ] (]) 15:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::::Lol, yes, it's a purely Russian thing, though I remember notifying you of derailment multiple times in the past. Got a Russian grandparent, perhaps? But yes. Salafist thugs are hiding in civilian areas of Aleppo, Syria is simply responding the same way your Ukrainian friends are doing to the separatists (as much "their own people" as the Salafists of Syria, if not more). Should be fine by the pro-NATO handbook then. So why be a hypocrite? ] (]) 15:48, 18 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::::notforum - no point responding anyhow - its a morally ambiguous universe. you know i'm naïve enough to believe Assad rleased the thugs in the past to create ths kind of situation, and has left them pretty much untouched, until very recently as the situation has changed, and meanwhile barrel bombed whole districts of civilians , (and gassed them - whatever the partisangirls, and Hezbollah, and putinists, and western shills say.) ] (]) 15:59, 18 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::::::"No forum", so what's your point? Baghdadi was released by the US, as were plenty other ISIS leaders (straight from Guantanamo, does that make the US an Assad ally?). The guys Assad released ended up in Ahrar al Sham (still considered "good rebels" by many), not ISIS, and they were released as appeasement to the opposition. Divide and conquer is the oldest, most effective trick in the book. Of course Assad will exploit intra-Jihadi turf wars, anything else would be insane. ] (]) 18:05, 18 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
The section on the ''Assad government'' highlights how "Syria became an independent republic in 1946, though democratic rule was ended by a CIA-supported coup in March 1949". Not only does this call into question statements about ‘home-grown’ protests, but is a another indication that this conflict could be the result of Western involvement. Might Misplaced Pages reflect this? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:34, 17 July 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
I am writing to request a correction to the map featured in the Syriab Civil War article (https://en.wikipedia.org/Syrian_civil_war). Upon reviewing the current map, I noticed that it contains inaccuracies that misrepresent Syria’s political boundaries. | |||
So, should the Syrian Civil War (section) reflect past US involvement in the undermining the Syrian Government? | |||
Issue with the Current Map: | |||
] (]) 12:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
The map inaccurately depicts certain borders that do not align with official sources, such as the United Nations or other credible geopolitical references. This could lead to misunderstandings about the Syrian factions' territorial boundaries. | |||
Proposed Solution: | |||
== Strength needs to be updated for 2014 == | |||
I suggest replacing the current map with one that reflects accurate and up-to-date information. For reference, I recommend using maps from reliable sources, such as: | |||
("https://syria.liveuamap.com" “UN Cartographic Section,” “The CIA World Factbook,” etc.) | |||
lets start with Nusra front | |||
Importance of This Correction: | |||
old strength in article: 7,000-8,000 | |||
Accuracy: Ensuring that the map reflects reliable data is crucial for maintaining Misplaced Pages’s credibility. | |||
new current strength: 5,000-6,000 | |||
Neutrality: An accurate map helps present a fair and balanced view of Syria, avoiding potential biases. | |||
Educational Value: Many students, researchers, and readers rely on Misplaced Pages for factual information. Correcting the map ensures they are not misinformed. | |||
I am happy to assist by providing additional resources or supporting documentation to facilitate this update. Please feel free to reach out if further clarification is needed. | |||
Thank you for considering this request and for your dedication to keeping Misplaced Pages accurate and reliable. | |||
source: http://www.heartsofiron4.com/r/xzu79nziq7 | |||
] (]) |
<ref>"https://syria.liveuamap.com</ref> ] (]) 14:23, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:@] Our old source was liveuamap, our current source is ISW-CTP which was debated on and considered to be the superior source in a previous talk page. The map is mostly accurate from what I can see and would like to ask what specific thing you consider inaccurate? ] (]) 07:04, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ISIS strength needs to be updated == | |||
::There is a new map update from ISW-CTP (https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/iran-update-december-26-2024). | |||
::Also, I should bring up that I am seeing news channels use the “united rebels” map. At some point we probably should reconsider the overall stance on the current map. ] (]) 16:33, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@] | |||
:::This conversation has already been had, we all decided that ISW-CTP is the best source as of now and it will stay as the source for now | |||
:::It takes a while for Misplaced Pages editors to update the map, please be patient as they have lives and things to do outside of Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 20:25, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Yes, I remember the original map discussion. But let’s not forget that war tends to change quickly. ] (]) 15:27, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::@], | |||
::Thank you for considering my request. I actually sent it on the basis that some of the rebel factions in Syria were emerging under the new Defence Ministry, which means that HTS would also be one of the factions that joined this new government. There have also been changes in the Golan Heights, as the Military of Israel is advancing rapidly into Syria, which isn't shown on the current map. I would like to see the sources you are using so I can affirm that these sources are reliable. If you have any questions, please respond. ] (]) 17:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@] I believe that the map hasn't been updated according to the source since the 24th, probably due to the guy updating it being busy. The source can be found in the Iran section of ISW CTPs website. ] (]) 17:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::@], | |||
::::Thank you, I will look at the article so I can check it for credibility. ] (]) 18:00, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::{{done}}, based on multiple other consensus.]]]]]] | |||
::::Ps: Thats true, I was busy. Really sorry I was in the middle east for another unrelated project. ] (]) 01:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
{{Ref-talk}} | |||
According to SOHR, ISIS now has 50,000 fighters in Syria. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Misplaced Pages Admins Sleeping == | |||
== Is the Assad Government worst than ISIS? == | |||
The map is super outdated. Syria now has a proper government and the Cvil War got over on 9 December only. The Misplaced Pages Administrators are in deep sleep. ] (]) 10:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Given the ever-growing concerns about ISIS terror gangs, why does Misplaced Pages continue to maintain the statement that: "the vast majority of abuses, as well as the largest in scale, were being committed by the Syrian government"? In light of latest events, should not this questionable statement be updated? ] (]) 12:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:It is so obviously biased that it should at least be removed. ] (]) 18:38, 23 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:The article will be updated eventually. It’s a slow process. ] (]) 18:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Do it then! We are told to be bold as editors. Its not Misplaced Pages continuing to maintain this statement. Its we editors not being bold enough to remove controversial and unsourced statements. | |||
:We gotta see if the March agreement holds. | |||
] (]) 08:02, 24 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:That also gives time to see if SNA and SDF escalate after the US leadership change or if that new Pro-Assad insurgent group goes anything ] (]) 20:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Why would you expect the Administrators to care for content updates? ] (]) 00:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== |
== ISW map == | ||
Can the map, please be updated with regards to by ISW ] (]) 08:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Obviously, if Misplaced Pages had a four-column conflict infobox template, that would be preferable. Heck, I'd even take a five-column one, since Jabhat al-Nusra has clashed with the FSA and other groups in the past. I mean, we could really go crazy without the constraints Misplaced Pages imposes, and maybe it's better this way. But we are left with the problem of how to arrange the combatants. | |||
:{{done}} ] (]) 01:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Obviously, the Syrian government and the "mainstream" armed opposition groups oppose one another. The Islamic State is currently fighting both the government (captured an airbase this weekend) and the opposition (battling for supremacy in Aleppo, among other places), as well as the Kurds in both Syria and Iraq, which has been a well-publicized part of the conflict lately. But the Islamic State could also be seen as a co-belligerent of the rest of the opposition against the government...except for the part where the government appears to have played them off one another to the point where the Islamic State has arguably spent more of its time, energy, blood, and ammo against anti-Assad fighters and civilians than it has fighting the Syrian Army. | |||
::@], it now needs to be in accordance with and also the map doesn't seem updated from the looks of the northeast Syria on the other side of Euphrates ] (]) 05:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Pro-assad insurgency in Alawite areas of West Syria == | |||
The Kurds have cooperated with the government at times, but they also took up arms against the Syrian Army fairly early in the fighting and continue to stake out their own territory much more aggressively than they did before the conflict began. The Kurds have clashed with opposition fighters at times, but it seems to me they have largely acted as co-belligerents (if not allies) against both the government and the Islamic State. | |||
From around about 11th December 2024, there has been an Assad loyalist insurgency against the new Syrian government. | |||
So my preference would be to to presenting the government and Islamic State in their own columns and including the Kurds with a line separator in the opposition column, before ]'s edit. But I'm interested in hearing other editors' take on this. -] (]) 03:39, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:According to , the cities of Hasakah and Qamishli are under joint government-Kurdish control. This indicates a level of cooperation between the government and the Kurds. Those two parties rarely fought against each other, so it seems like the least unfavorable option is to put the Kurds in the same column as the government, but separated by a horizontal line.--] (]) 04:07, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Evidence of this happening: | |||
::Is there a way to do it similar to how the ] infobox presents the sides? The Kurdish militias and government hardly seemed to be on the same side in 2011, 2012, or most of 2013. -] (]) 04:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0ew5g3vzreo | |||
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Western_Syria_clashes_(December_2024%E2%80%93present) -> Misplaced Pages article talking about this | |||
:::Issue has been discussed about a dozen times and the result was always - ISIS in the rebel column with a double separation line. Number 1 - it is not possible to make four columns. Number 2 - ISIS was in an alliance with the rest of the anti-Assad forces for a full year before they turned on each other. Number 3 - Most reliable sources consider ISIS still one of the anti-Assad forces and when talking about the ISIS vs FSA/IF/Nusra conflict they refer to it as inter-rebel factional fighting. Even SOHR counts ISIS fatalities in the overall toll as part of the opposition force's death toll. Number 4 - Kurds are playing their own game separate from everyone else and that's why they have a column of their own. They are at the moment in an alliance with the Syrian government in Hasakah vs ISIS and in an alliance with the FSA vs ISIS in Aleppo. Although they don't like Assad they are not part of the anti-Assad forces because they don't care if he falls or remains, just as long as nobody buts into their bussiness and leaves them alone to run their own country. And in the future, please discuss the issue more broadly with other editors before making rather unilateral edits. Thank you! ] (]) 04:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Whoever has access to editing the Infobox, can someone please check the info and add it in? I tried to, can't. | |||
::::I appreciate your thoughts. Please review ] before telling me how to edit Misplaced Pages. Thank you! -] (]) 05:01, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::I am aware of WP:BRD but this is a rather controversial issue and besides BRD also states ''Care and diplomacy should be exercised.'' ] (]) 18:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::I'm not so sure about ISIS & Assad always having been enemies, though certainly are now. See: | |||
::::http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/08/22/should-the-us-work-with-assad-to-fight-isis/assad-has-never-fought-isis-before?utm_content=buffer2c2c3&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer# | |||
::::http://online.wsj.com/articles/assad-policies-aided-rise-of-islamic-state-militant-group-1408739733 | |||
::::http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10585391/Syrias-Assad-accused-of-boosting-al-Qaeda-with-secret-oil-deals.html ] (]) 11:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::Divide and conquer, the oldest trick in the book. ISIS and the other insurgents were allied for a long time (still are, conducted joint operation in Lebanon a few weeks ago), and yes, the regime fought them from the beginning. But why should they intervene when ISIS began slaughtering other terrorists? Assad did the only sane thing. ] (]) 11:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::::Given that the Kurds & ISIS seem to be out for themselves, maybe ISIS & the Kurds should be together w/a double line between them. Something similar to the Bosnian War infobox might also work. ] (]) 04:07, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::::::That makes no sense, they are fighting each other. If anything, grouping the Kurds with the regime would make more sense than that, since they don't fight. But yet again, what we have is the most accurate, as ISIL is simply assimilating the rest of the Islamist groups. ] (]) 04:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::But the FSA isn't "Islamist", and they've asked for U.S. help in fighting ISIS: Just because some FSA units have defected to ISIS doesn't make them bedfellows, at all. ISIS has probably been responsible for more FSA casualties than it has Syrian Army casualties. -] (]) 05:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::The "Free Syrian Army"? What is that but merely a name? They're militarily about as significant in Syria as Fatah is in Gaza. ] (]) 05:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
<Reduce indent> What about the idea of arranging the infobox like the ] infobox? Is it even possible or are the various factions of the civil war too complex in their shifting alliances for such an idea? ] (]) 10:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:It is of course a lot easier to make such an arrangement with hindsight. This war is ongoing, so there is no such clear overview yet. Trying to neaten things up would be way too premature. ] (]) 12:11, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:: So should it be done whenever the war ends? ] (]) 11:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::Only if it turns out such a scheme makes sense. Again, the point is that it's too early to know. Many of these "groups" (or rather just names of various constellations) have little significance and will largely be forgotten anyway. ] (]) 11:16, 28 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
*Agree with EkoGraf. Especially since the other "rebel" group are slowly but surely being absorbed by ISIL. ] (]) 05:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::There's that too. At this rate, soon more than half of ISIS will be former FSA/IF units. ] (]) 18:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Cheers and God bless. ] (]) 08:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Tabqa == | |||
In the most recent entry of ] Tabqa airbase is mentioned. Is ] just an airbase, or also a quarter or a town? We don't seem to have an entry for either and the news reports are also not too precise. Maybe somebody could also update the disambiguation page. ---] (]) 11:01, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
== important template editing == | |||
There is the town of Tabqa, on the bank of the lake, and the Tabqa air base some dozens of miles to the south. ] (]) 08:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Belligerents article == | |||
The information below the current Syria map directs to the US and Russian occupation ... intervention in the Syrian civil war, while the Turkish occupation directs to the Turkish occupation of Northern Syria page. This is a very wrong redirect. Turkey has conducted multi-faceted work and interventions on Syria. This page should be directed directly to Turkish involvement in the Syrian civil war. | |||
] was apparently copied from this article and doesn't add anything new. Therefore I have nominated it for deletion some time ago. Can the resident editors here join the discussion (]) to generate more thoughts on the issue? ] (]) 17:07, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Why not let it be, and shorten the section here instead? We want this article to be shorter after all. ] (]) 22:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Since ] exists & seems to more advanced, the ] article seems redundant. Shorten the relevant section here, but have the info at ]. Either merge ] into ] or have it redirect there (if there's no unique info in the article). ] (]) 11:12, 28 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
'''''Request for correction ;''''' | |||
==Adding Israel as belligerent on Syrian Civil War maps== | |||
] | |||
I would like to transfer here the discussion on Syrian Civil War maps legend - which has been low-level ongoing at ], dealing with how to color Israeli Golan Heights and whether Israel should be added as a belligerent on the Syrian war maps. | |||
* I would like to point out that on June 2013, a ] was reached to color Israeli-controlled Western Golan as striped (territory claimed by Syria, but ''de-facto'' controlled by Israel since 1967), in order to differentiate Western Golan from the rest of Syria since Syrian War battles are ongoing on Eastern Golan (Quneitra Governorate). | |||
* ] It is also evident that the community has established that Israel is not a participant of the Syrian Civil War (so far), which is evident from discussions, archived at ] and from ]-related motion (amendment of WP:ARBPIA on ), which is specifically drawing the borderline between generally unrelated preceding Arab-Israeli conflict and the current Syrian Civil War; quote "The Arbitration Committee concludes that the topic of the Syrian Civil War does not fit within the category of Arab-Israeli disputes, although certain specific issues relating to that war would fall within that topic." | |||
* On April-May 2014 several users began a new discussion at ], with some proposing to color Israeli Golan Heights as white or blue and adding Israel into belligerents' legend. Apparently most of them are not aware of community decisions prior to April 2014. The attempt to add Israeli forces on Golan Heights as part of Syrian belligerents was however shortly reverted .] | |||
*On August 23-25 ] again attempted to change Syrian Civil War-related maps to reflect the opinion that Israeli forces on Western Golan should be presented as part of the Syrian Civil War.<br> | |||
I'm herewith asking for opinions whether a long-standing consensus should be changed and Syrian Civil War maps, which currently present 4 belligerents - Syrian Government / Syrian Opposition / ISIS / Syrian Kurdistan, should also be added with 5th belligerent Israel (add /do not add). Thank you.] (]) 07:59, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
{{Leftlegend|#CBE8C5|] and ]❌}}<hr> | |||
===Discussion=== | |||
*First of all, consensus can change, just like the facts on the ground can. Secondly, Sopher99, who featured aggressively in many discussions, has been indef banned, including his several sockpuppets, which "contributed" all over the place in relation to Syria, so who knows what the "community" would agree on today. Thirdly, Israel does not need to be in the infobox just because it features on a war map, and could qualify as "certain specific issues relating to that war would fall within that topic." ] (]) 08:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Consensus can change, but there should be a new consensus to change a previous consensus. Some people obviously challenge the previous consensus (4 belligerents on war maps), thus i open this thread.] (]) 08:16, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
*I don't agree with considering Israel a belligerent, if that's the proposal on the table. But I think it's appropriate to shade the map to indicate that Israel controls a part of what is ''de jure'' Syria. -] (]) 08:41, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::Thats not the proposal on the table, Greyshark is not presenting this issue in an accurate way. No one is adding Israel as a belligerent. The map shows the "current military situation in Syria" and it should be pointed out that Israel is occupying part of Syria, not that Israel is a belligerent. Please take a look at the map I added here where the Golan heights is in white and the text under it with the dotted line separating that part of Syria that Israel is occupying from the civil war. --] (]) 13:25, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::For that purpose we can stripe the Western Golan (as decided on June 2013) - which has already been implemented on Syrian Civil War map in the past (January 2014 version); However, adding Israeli forces to map certainly implies it is a belligerent.] (]) 08:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::Whether we ''consider'' it a belligerent or not is irrelevant to the fact that Israel does physically interact with the undisputed belligerents in various ways. This is a fact, and if we keep Israel out of such a map, it will just be a ridiculous elephant in the room. And again, this has no bearing on whether Israel should be in the infobox as a belligerent or not, it is a separate issue. ] (]) 08:58, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::No one wants to put Israel in a map about Syria. The map shows the "current military situation in Syria", and we should point out that Israel is occupying part of Syria. We are not adding Israel as a belligerent. Greyshark has not presented this correctly. Please look at the map I added where the part of Syria that Israel is occupying is in white.--] (]) 13:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::The striped Western Golan (without adding Israel as belligerent) is well implemented in the ].] (]) 09:15, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
{{Leftlegend|#CBE8C5|] and ]✅}}<hr> ] (]) 17:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
IMO, the Golan Heights should be stripped, not colored. However, ultimately, it really doesn't make much of a difference.--] (]) 12:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Capitalisation of Iraqi civil war == | |||
]}}{{legend|#e2d974|Controlled by the Kurdish Self-Administration}}{{legend|#b4b2ae|Controlled by the ]}}{{legend|#cdecc9|Controlled by other rebels}}-----------------------------------------------------------{{legend|white|(under ])}}]] | |||
{{U|AHI-3000}}, in this you would recapitalise ''Iraqi civil war'' which you added with this . Per ], we only apply capitalisation when this is consistently done in sources. Per ngram the term is not consistently capped in sources. There is a ] to gain ] before reinstating a challenged edit. ] (]) 04:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
'''Greyshark is not presenting this correctly:''' Greyshark talks about an "Israeli Golan Heights", no such thing exists. We are talking about an area that is in Syria. In this discussion: we talked about a location map of Syria and it was closed by a non-admin. The consensus there was that both a striped or non striped map could be used based on a case by case situation. Israel is not occupying stripes in Golan, so that kind of map shouldn't be used here. ·In this case the map shows the "Military situation in Syria", so not only active participants in the Syrian civil war. Look at the map to the right of this text. At Syrian Kurdistan talkpage we talked about this issue and it was consensus to have the Israeli-occupied Golan as white and it separated with a dotted line "(under Israeli occupation)": ] --] (]) 13:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::This is the 4th time in the past year that you are trying to push 5th belligerent into the main Syrian Civil War map.] (]) 15:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
INAPPROPRIATE CANVASSING: Greyshark has also went all over the place posting this: which is clearly inappropriate canvassing. The discussion is NOT to ad Israel as 5th belligerent to Syrian Civil War maps, but to show that in a map showing the '''"Current military situation in Syria"''' Israel is occupying the Golan heights. --] (]) 13:10, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:The image used throughout Syrian civil war articles is named "Syrian Civil War", not "current military situation in Syria".] (]) 15:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Doesn't matter. The image is presented in articles as "Current military situation in Syria" Israel is occupying part of Syria - before and during the Syrian civil war. It may not be a belligerent, but it is not presented as such in the map, only that it is occupying part of Syria. The Israeli-occupied part of Syria is specifically separated from the factions fighting each other. --] (]) 15:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:You are warned that throwing allegations on others with no basis is violating Misplaced Pages guidelines.] (]) 15:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
::You have indeed acted inappropriately as you have opened this discussion and posted comments on people talkpages misrepresenting the map I added.--] (]) 15:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Israel is not involved in the civil war, therefore should not be shown. If any side where to invade Israeli occupied Golan Heights, only than should it be included, but at the current state, do not add Israel.—]]] 02:27, 30 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Israel has bombed Syrian targets inside Syria plenty of times the last three years, and treated anti-Assad fighters in the Golan. So yes, Israel is involved, but not as a very active belligerent. And yet again, that is irrelevant to this map. ] (]) 10:42, 30 August 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:01, 13 January 2025
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Syrian civil war article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Misplaced Pages is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Misplaced Pages's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Syrian civil war. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Syrian civil war at the Reference desk. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting. |
faq page Frequently asked questions Q1: Why is this article titled in lowercase, as opposed to Syrian Civil War (which redirects to this article)? A1: Misplaced Pages policy on article titles is to use sentence case unless a preponderance of reliable sources treats the subject as a proper name. While this policy can lead to inconsistent titles (e.g. compare this article's title with Russian Civil War), community consensus (confirmed most recently here for this article) is that following the treatment by reliable sources takes precedence over in-Misplaced Pages title consistency. |
|
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Syrian civil war, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
Consensus required: All editors must obtain consensus on the talk page of this article before reinstating any edits that have been challenged (via reversion). If in doubt, don't make the edit. |
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Other talk page banners | |||||||||
|
Topical archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
FAQ: infobox
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Question
Why is the infobox short? Where is the information about belligerents and other information commonly seen in an infobox?
Answer
The Syrian civil war is an ongoing multi-sided conflict in Syria involving various state-sponsored and non-state actors.
Previously, this article had a very long infobox, which attempted to capture the complex relationships between the many belligerent parties in this civil war and present other information such as strengths and casualties.
An RfC was held proposing a substantially shorter version as we now see (Talk:Syrian civil war/Archive 51#RfC on infobox).
To summarise some key points, an infobox is a simple, at-a-glance summary of key points from the article. It is unsuited to capturing nuance and complex information. Quoting from MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE:
The less information that an infobox contains, the more effectively it serves its purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance.
The consensus of the RfC was for the substantially shorter version of the infobox.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.Issues
The whole article needs a rewrite, it for example lists allied forces as bellingerents. And it's locked so that nobody can actually do anything to deal with its problems.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.78.207.102 (talk) 07:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- I suppose that just as consensus can change, so can allies change. Feel free to use {{Edit semi-protected}} here to suggest specific edits. – wbm1058 (talk) 01:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed, needs to be re-written. Starting with the title that reads "CIVIL" war. When foreign forces unlawfully invade and annihilate your country, it is not a civil war. It is a hostile and aggressive attack we call today terror. Calling it a "civil" war is a misleading political statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.29.185 (talk) 09:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- It's quite common for foreign forces to intervene in a civil war. That doesn't (necessarily) change the internal aspect of the war. — kwami (talk) 08:19, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- I would support the notion that this was not a civil war but a proxy war. Mercenaries, foreign or national, fighting a proxy war for foreign powers, paid, armed and guided by those foreign powers, among which the CIA, do not qualify as a local uprising and part of a civil war. Mregelsberger (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- For the people who are defending USA and NATO, USA with the help of turkey, they posioned syrian civillians by dropping posion gas from airplanes. If that is not a war crime then I do not know what is. 155.4.141.62 (talk) 21:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- I would support the notion that this was not a civil war but a proxy war. Mercenaries, foreign or national, fighting a proxy war for foreign powers, paid, armed and guided by those foreign powers, among which the CIA, do not qualify as a local uprising and part of a civil war. Mregelsberger (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think that even the title - Syrian Civil War - is misleading and should be changed. This is corroborated by people here and by information, that is increasingly available, not least the continuation of the proxy war between the USA and Russia in Ukraine. A proxy war opposing armed gangs managed by foreign powers and a national army is not a civil war, even though it apparently is among national parties. The "conflict in Ukraine" as it is called by the OHCHR is quite similar and is named on Misplaced Pages as "War in Donbas" described, without further proof as follows: "The war in Donbas, or Donbas war was a phase of the Russo-Ukrainian War in the Donbas region of Ukraine." This could also be said of the war in Syria, which could be named the "War in Syria", a "phase of the proxy war of the USA and Russia, opposing US mercenary groups assisted by US and US ally troupes and the Syrian army with Syrian allies (Russia, Iran, Hezbollah)". The war in Syria actually is not over, with the USA illegally occupying the north-eastern part of the country, i.e. the oil fields of Syria, producing oil on its own account without permission from the national government. Nothing is "civil" there. Misplaced Pages shouldn't get involved in politics and have only one standard, in this case applied to all conflicts alike, without distinction of who is waging them. Mregelsberger (talk) 10:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. There is a sentence in there saying that the Syrian Civil War "...started nine years ago..." This page needs work. Livepsycle (talk) 04:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Well said. Spiralwhats in your boxCox (talk) 11:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
References
- "Conflict-related civilian casualties in Ukraine" (PDF). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 27 January 2022. Retrieved 22 November 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
Status of War RFC
Is the Syrian civil war over? 207.96.32.81 (talk) 00:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- No. I'm pretty sure what's happening right now is still civil war material, mostly due to ISIS and the Kurds. Although, my question is, is this the end of this FIRST Syrian civil war, and a new one began? Or is it just a new phase? Zabezt (talk) 00:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I would say no. There is no end in sight for violence in Syria, especially with the ongoing fight for Manbij, and it remains to be seen if the new government will actually be stable enough not to immediately descend into civil war once again. I’m not sure who edited the article to say it ended today, but I’d wait until a stable government has been established before any drastic changes are made. DarthTFalls12 (talk) 01:00, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. And I reverted the inaccuracy on the infobox, it's way too early to tell. Zabezt (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- As of this comment, the result parameter is used not status parameter for template:Infobox_military_conflict See this edit - 207.96.32.81 (talk) 03:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I would disagree theres no end in sight, given Assad has fallen there is very much an end in sight if the rebel groups can come to agreement. But I do think its too early to say its over now GothicGolem29 (talk) 01:41, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. And I reverted the inaccuracy on the infobox, it's way too early to tell. Zabezt (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- No. The rebels might start fighting each other so for now its still going GothicGolem29 (talk) 01:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment (not a vote): I don't know a whole lot about the war myself, but if it now only involves people from other/outside countries, then wouldn't this technically be no longer a civil war (i.e. "just a war")? — AP 499D25 (talk) 03:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is not over YET. Hinga toka (talk) 03:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- an important competitor in the Syrian civil war which is rojava does still exist and still fighting in manbaj so it should be ongoing but with adding the information that says Assad regime has fallen or maybe as long nothing is clear for the aftermath of this offensive let's just leave it empty untill something happens 81.215.194.128 (talk) 06:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Basically Not Yet - We rushed to announce the war in Afghanistan as being over and that was a mistake (albeit one that ultimately didn't make too much difference). I'm of the same opinion here: let's have some reliable sources saying it's over before we declare it over based on our own assessments. FOARP (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not over. I agree it is not over. if the various opposition groups, factions, and militias do not have any conflicts at all after today, it will be a miracle. i think we need to keep covering this for a while.*:Sm8900 (talk) 14:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. The war aim is to overthrow Assad regime since the beginning. It should be declared as over on December 8, 2024. For post-war conflicts, a new article should be created (e.g. Syrian crisis (2011-present)) like Afghanistan conflict and Libyan crisis (2011–present). CobsonEnjoyer (talk) 01:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- the war aim for each group in a war, is to win the war. the different factions are already fighting to win power from the others. Sm8900 (talk) 02:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is becoming an issue. People are inserting into the info box "Syrian Opposition victory" despite the infobox claiming the war is ongoing. Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 19:05, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- That may be appropriate for Fall of Damascus but on this page is the open question. 207.96.32.81 (talk) 20:19, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- No. There is still fighting between HTS and SDF. In any case we shouldn't hurry but rather wait for RS to assert this. Alaexis¿question? 21:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not over - Initially, the civil war was only against Bashar al-Assad but there are too many factions for years now who are currently almost as dominant as Assad's regime once was. - Ratnahastin (talk) 03:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wait we can’t say for sure yet The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 05:33, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not yet Per the title, the scope of the article is civil warring in Syria. While/if internal fighting continues between different factions after the fall of the Assad government, then ipso facto the civil warring continues. The lead tells us that such factional fighting is within the scope of the article. Most crucially though, the civil war is over when good quality sources explicitly tell us it is - noting that WP:NEWSORG sources are qualified as sources (see also WP:RSBREAKING). Cinderella157 (talk) 02:13, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, there's still fighting between various Islamist forces and Kurdish forces.
- Sarrotrkux (talk) 21:16, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Too soon to know. I think there isn't any objective measure or historian consensus as yet, and it would seem WP:OR for us to make a determination and declare it in WP. Cheers Markbassett (talk) 05:55, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 December 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Dear Misplaced Pages Editors,
I am writing to request a correction to the map featured in the Syriab Civil War article (https://en.wikipedia.org/Syrian_civil_war). Upon reviewing the current map, I noticed that it contains inaccuracies that misrepresent Syria’s political boundaries.
Issue with the Current Map: The map inaccurately depicts certain borders that do not align with official sources, such as the United Nations or other credible geopolitical references. This could lead to misunderstandings about the Syrian factions' territorial boundaries.
Proposed Solution: I suggest replacing the current map with one that reflects accurate and up-to-date information. For reference, I recommend using maps from reliable sources, such as:
("https://syria.liveuamap.com" “UN Cartographic Section,” “The CIA World Factbook,” etc.)
Importance of This Correction: Accuracy: Ensuring that the map reflects reliable data is crucial for maintaining Misplaced Pages’s credibility. Neutrality: An accurate map helps present a fair and balanced view of Syria, avoiding potential biases. Educational Value: Many students, researchers, and readers rely on Misplaced Pages for factual information. Correcting the map ensures they are not misinformed. I am happy to assist by providing additional resources or supporting documentation to facilitate this update. Please feel free to reach out if further clarification is needed.
Thank you for considering this request and for your dedication to keeping Misplaced Pages accurate and reliable.
Planotap (talk) 14:23, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Planotap Our old source was liveuamap, our current source is ISW-CTP which was debated on and considered to be the superior source in a previous talk page. The map is mostly accurate from what I can see and would like to ask what specific thing you consider inaccurate? Smol2204 (talk) 07:04, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- There is a new map update from ISW-CTP (https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/iran-update-december-26-2024).
- Also, I should bring up that I am seeing news channels use the “united rebels” map. At some point we probably should reconsider the overall stance on the current map. 2600:1702:5870:5930:0:0:0:3C (talk) 16:33, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- @2600:1702:5870:5930:0:0:0:3C
- This conversation has already been had, we all decided that ISW-CTP is the best source as of now and it will stay as the source for now
- It takes a while for Misplaced Pages editors to update the map, please be patient as they have lives and things to do outside of Misplaced Pages. Smol2204 (talk) 20:25, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I remember the original map discussion. But let’s not forget that war tends to change quickly. 2600:1702:5870:5930:6DE3:6F3F:7F40:9D51 (talk) 15:27, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Smol2204,
- Thank you for considering my request. I actually sent it on the basis that some of the rebel factions in Syria were emerging under the new Defence Ministry, which means that HTS would also be one of the factions that joined this new government. There have also been changes in the Golan Heights, as the Military of Israel is advancing rapidly into Syria, which isn't shown on the current map. I would like to see the sources you are using so I can affirm that these sources are reliable. If you have any questions, please respond. Planotap (talk) 17:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Planotap I believe that the map hasn't been updated according to the source since the 24th, probably due to the guy updating it being busy. The source can be found in the Iran section of ISW CTPs website. Smol2204 (talk) 17:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Smol2204,
- Thank you, I will look at the article so I can check it for credibility. Planotap (talk) 18:00, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done, based on multiple other consensus.
- Ps: Thats true, I was busy. Really sorry I was in the middle east for another unrelated project. Kaliper1 (talk) 01:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Planotap I believe that the map hasn't been updated according to the source since the 24th, probably due to the guy updating it being busy. The source can be found in the Iran section of ISW CTPs website. Smol2204 (talk) 17:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
References
Misplaced Pages Admins Sleeping
The map is super outdated. Syria now has a proper government and the Cvil War got over on 9 December only. The Misplaced Pages Administrators are in deep sleep. Someone12732 (talk) 10:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article will be updated eventually. It’s a slow process. 2600:1702:5870:5930:FC9E:65BA:C0D9:E90C (talk) 18:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- We gotta see if the March agreement holds.
- That also gives time to see if SNA and SDF escalate after the US leadership change or if that new Pro-Assad insurgent group goes anything 2001:56A:6FFF:C37C:241D:A004:6C05:96A6 (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Why would you expect the Administrators to care for content updates? Dimadick (talk) 00:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
ISW map
Can the map, please be updated with regards to Iran Update, December 30, 2024 by ISW Waleed (talk) 08:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done Kaliper1 (talk) 01:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Kaliper1, it now needs to be in accordance with Iran Update, January 7, 2025 and also the map doesn't seem updated from the looks of the northeast Syria on the other side of Euphrates Waleed (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Pro-assad insurgency in Alawite areas of West Syria
From around about 11th December 2024, there has been an Assad loyalist insurgency against the new Syrian government.
Evidence of this happening: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0ew5g3vzreo
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Western_Syria_clashes_(December_2024%E2%80%93present) -> Misplaced Pages article talking about this
Whoever has access to editing the Infobox, can someone please check the info and add it in? I tried to, can't.
Cheers and God bless. Hemzk (talk) 08:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
important template editing
The information below the current Syria map directs to the US and Russian occupation ... intervention in the Syrian civil war, while the Turkish occupation directs to the Turkish occupation of Northern Syria page. This is a very wrong redirect. Turkey has conducted multi-faceted work and interventions on Syria. This page should be directed directly to Turkish involvement in the Syrian civil war.
Request for correction ;
Syrian National Army and Turkish occupation❌Syrian National Army and Turkish occupation✅
78.135.94.16 (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Capitalisation of Iraqi civil war
AHI-3000, in this edit you would recapitalise Iraqi civil war which you added with this edit. Per MOS:CAPS, we only apply capitalisation when this is consistently done in sources. Per this ngram the term is not consistently capped in sources. There is a WP:ONUS to gain WP:CONSENSUS before reinstating a challenged edit. Cinderella157 (talk) 04:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- Misplaced Pages objectionable content
- Old requests for peer review
- Misplaced Pages In the news articles
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in History
- B-Class vital articles in History
- B-Class Arab world articles
- High-importance Arab world articles
- WikiProject Arab world articles
- B-Class history articles
- High-importance history articles
- High-importance contemporary history articles
- Contemporary history task force articles
- WikiProject History articles
- B-Class Germany articles
- High-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- B-Class International relations articles
- High-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- B-Class Iran articles
- High-importance Iran articles
- WikiProject Iran articles
- B-Class Iraq articles
- High-importance Iraq articles
- WikiProject Iraq articles
- B-Class Islam-related articles
- High-importance Islam-related articles
- B-Class Salaf articles
- Mid-importance Salaf articles
- Salaf task force articles
- B-Class Shi'a Islam articles
- Mid-importance Shi'a Islam articles
- Shi'a Islam task force articles
- B-Class Sunni Islam articles
- Mid-importance Sunni Islam articles
- Sunni Islam task force articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- B-Class Israel-related articles
- High-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- B-Class Assyrian articles
- High-importance Assyrian articles
- WikiProject Assyria articles
- B-Class Kurdistan articles
- High-importance Kurdistan articles
- WikiProject Kurdistan articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- C-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class Russia articles
- High-importance Russia articles
- High-importance B-Class Russia articles
- B-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- B-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- B-Class Syria articles
- Top-importance Syria articles
- WikiProject Syria articles
- B-Class Turkey articles
- Top-importance Turkey articles
- All WikiProject Turkey pages
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- B-Class United States military history articles
- B-Class United States History articles
- High-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class 2010s articles
- High-importance 2010s articles
- WikiProject 2010s articles
- B-Class Human rights articles
- Top-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Misplaced Pages articles under general sanctions
- Pages in the Misplaced Pages Top 25 Report