| Revision as of 11:44, 6 July 2006 editRelentlessRecusant (talk | contribs)3,705 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 02:29, 16 May 2013 edit undoWerieth (talk | contribs)54,678 editsm clean up using AWB |
| (68 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
__NOTOC__ |
|
__NOTOC__<div style="background-color: #FDD0EA; color: #500040;"> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* This file is used for the history dates only. |
|
{| width="100%" border="0" style="padding: 4px; border:1px solid #a5ff00; margin:0; background-color:#cefd8b" |
|
|
|<center><div class="plainlinks"><center><h2>Please place NEW Messages near the TOP of this file. Just click on the edit here =></h2> |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
<!--********************************************************************************************************* PLEASE PLACE YOUR COMMENTS JUST BELOW THIS LINE |
|
|
********************************************************************************************************* --> |
|
|
==]== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
<table width="100%" style="background-color: rgb(220, 220, 220); text-align: left; font-family: monospace;" border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2"><tr style="vertical-align: top; text-align: center; background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204);"><td>'''Archive'''</td><td>'''From'''</td><td>'''To'''</td><td style="background-color:#DDDDDD" rowspan="6" width="100px">]</td> |
|
Hey, Coredesat! I've read your comments on the aformentioned articles. Please explain your thinking more to me, as your definately have more experience than I. If necessary, I'll add a description for every ship: it's condensed history, commander, accomplishments, famous battles it was at, and where it was destroyed. |
|
|
|
</tr><tr> |
|
|
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
Thanks, |
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:01:09 +0000</td> |
|
|
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:01:39 +0000</td> |
|
] 11:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
</tr><tr> |
|
|
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
=={{user|Nscheffey}}== |
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:22:37 +0000</td> |
|
=== re: === |
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:01:09 +0000</td> |
|
|
|
|
Adding unsourced information to an article is distinctly different than removing unsourced information from an article. |
|
|
|
|
|
Per ]: Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable source, or it may be removed by any editor. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it. |
|
|
|
|
|
In the future, please provide reputable sources that justify the link that you provided. And please ]. Thank you. ] 08:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Ste4k, chill out. Both of those links obviously belong in the article and your attempt to remove them has been reverted by another editor. You need to seriously calm down, you are not making any friends with your behavior. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 08:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Please ] and reconsider your actions from an objective viewpoint. Thanks. ] 08:50, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Please, please, for once, make a cogent argument as to why these links should not be in the article. I am familiar with all of the policies you have linked to, and I still see no basis for many of your actions. I'm also ] to think so. You need to calm down and be reasonable. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 09:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::I am not uncalm. I don't know why you would think I am. I don't know this man, and I don't dislike him, and I don't like him either way, he is just another human. He was involved in a one-million dollar law-suit. I think that if he knew that you purposely just added a direct link associating his biography (as an author) to a book that he didn't write, and he was sued a million dollars over, that he would probably make it worth some litigation on the part of the encyclopedia if he was so inclined. Don't you? If you have not been reading the ongoing conversation, then please do so since it is at least four or five screens long now. Thanks. ] 09:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Not only have I read the talk page, I've commented on it. The link to ACIM should be on there '''because''' he was involved in a one million dollar law suit over it. That makes it relevent to the article. What about that don't you understand? I have yet to see you directly reply to a point I (or any one else) have made. Try it. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 09:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Your statement is incorrect. He was not involved in a one million dollar law suit over that book. He was involved in a one million dollar law suit for his book, a different book, one which does not have the content that the book you are pointing/associating him with has. At the time of the lawsuit the book that you are pointing to did not even yet exist. Now that I have responded to your point please be kind enough to respond to mine. I think that if he knew that you purposely just added a direct link associating his biography (as an author) to a book that he didn't write, and he was sued a million dollars over, that he would probably make it worth some litigation on the part of the encyclopedia if he was so inclined. Don't you? ] 10:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::First you say he was "not involved in a one million dollar law suit over that book", then you say that I added a link to a book that "he was sued a million dollars over." This is within the same comment. Do you see how I have trouble following your logic? |
|
|
::<div style="background:white;">No. What is your point? Is the word "''that''" confusing you?</div> |
|
|
:::::The point is, he is associated with the ACIM movement because of this lawsuit. |
|
|
::<div style="background:white;"> Incorrect. "ACIM" is not a movement and he is not associated with that company. Companys rarely sue themselves or their associates.</div> |
|
|
:::::A link to the ACIM page deserves to be in this article. |
|
|
::<div id="d1" style="background:white;">Why? It deserves to be in the article much less than links to the marine corp or articles about the aftermath of Nagasaki. I base my reasoning on the fact that ACIM is neither sourced nor spoken of in the biography, and 50% of the biography rest on the secondary source that describes Anderson's horrors of seeing Nagasaki first hand just after it was bombed. Do you suppose you can come up with a reasonable secondary source that would provide enough content in the article to justify the context for the link? If so, I am all ears. I'm especially interested because whatever article you find, I will probably be able to use in a different article that I am currently writing. Otherwise. No original research, please.</div> |
|
|
:::::Your idea that he would litigate over this link and so we shouldn't include it is lunacy. |
|
|
::<div style="background:white;">Your statement make no sense.</div> |
|
|
:::::--]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 10:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::] 23:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Your anti-rationality forcefield is strong, let me try something else. From the 48 hours article: " Ross also says that Anderson has taken the New-Age doctrine of a "A Course in Miracles," and twisted its principles of self-enlightenment." By that alone,a link to ] deserves to be on the page. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 00:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::<div id="d1" style="background:white;">Please lower your tone and read the documentation for yourself. Same title, different content, different author, different book. Thanks. ] 00:41, 6 July 2006 (UTC) </div> |
|
|
|
|
|
== re: == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{npa3}} ] 02:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Please don't communicate with me through templates. It is a ] thing to do. And if you must use templates instead of thoughts, at least substitute them with "subst:". --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 03:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Continued discussion of your AfD issues === |
|
|
|
|
|
You wrote: " Next you mentioned the other editor who accused you of a bad faith AfD nom, Andrew Parodi. " |
|
|
This is not the person to whom I referred. Thanks. ] 07:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Well, it '''is''' the person to whom I referred in the original comment. Who could you have possibly thought I was referring to, seeing as I included a link to his comment? Did you not bother to follow the link before you replied that I didn't understand him correctly, or are so many editors suggesting bad faith noms by you that it's hard to keep them straight? Thanks. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 08:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:: of day, please. Thanks. ] 09:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::. ] 09:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Ste4k you are one of the most confused/confusing people I have ever interacted with. Let me try to make this simple. When I ask you about another editor suggesting a bad faith nom by you, and then link to said accusation ], I expect your replies to be concerning THAT EDITOR. The fact that you can't understand that is deeply disconcerting. Also, you have not replied to any of the points in my comment, which I would appreciate. Otherwise I will curse your userpage. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 20:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::By the way, your talk page design breaks the , which is annoying. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 20:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
===Otherwise I will curse your user page=== |
|
|
|
|
|
Explain this remark please. Thanks. ] 20:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:A joke based on your preoccupation with ].--]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 20:24, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
=== re: === |
|
|
|
|
|
Adding unsourced information to an article is distinctly different than removing unsourced information from an article. |
|
|
|
|
|
Per ]: Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable source, or it may be removed by any editor. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it. |
|
|
|
|
|
In the future, please provide reputable sources that justify the link that you provided. And please ]. Thank you. ] 08:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Ste4k, chill out. Both of those links obviously belong in the article and your attempt to remove them has been reverted by another editor. You need to seriously calm down, you are not making any friends with your behavior. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 08:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::Please ] and reconsider your actions from an objective viewpoint. Thanks. ] 08:50, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Please, please, for once, make a cogent argument as to why these links should not be in the article. I am familiar with all of the policies you have linked to, and I still see no basis for many of your actions. I'm also ] to think so. You need to calm down and be reasonable. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 09:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Your talk page is being vandalized. Please use this one here. It was occurring to fast for me to determine if you had mentioned anything. ] 10:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Article for deletion: Torrent finder== |
|
|
Hi, I hope you can take some time to vote on the AFD debate for the ] article (i noticed you had nominated another torrent site earlier). The debate is taking place at ]. thx! ] 11:43, 5 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- ********************************************************************************************************* --> |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Archives == |
|
| ⚫ |
<table style="background-color: rgb(220, 220, 220); text-align: left; font-family: monospace;" border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2"><tr style="vertical-align: top; text-align: center; background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204);"><td>'''Archive'''</td><td>'''From'''</td><td>'''To'''</td> |
|
|
</tr><tr> |
|
</tr><tr> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:30:10 +0000</td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:30:10 +0000</td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:22:37 +0000</td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:22:37 +0000</td> |
|
</tr><tr> |
|
</tr><tr> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:04:20 +0000</td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:04:20 +0000</td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:30:10 +0000</td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:30:10 +0000</td> |
|
</tr><tr> |
|
</tr><tr> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Sat, 17 Jun 2006 05:01.00 +0000</td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Sat, 17 Jun 2006 05:01.00 +0000</td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:04:20 +0000</td> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:04:20 +0000</td> |
|
</tr></table><div style="color:#FF0000; background:#000000"> |
|
</tr></table> |
|
<!-- PLEASE PUT NEW MESSAGES AT THE TOP OF THIS FILE. THANK YOU --> |
|
