Misplaced Pages

User talk:Reguyla: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:12, 6 September 2014 view sourceReguyla (talk | contribs)320 edits Acceptable use of talk page while banned: Reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:10, 14 April 2017 view source WMFOffice (talk | contribs)301 edits {{WMF-legal banned user}} 
(420 intermediate revisions by 49 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WMF-legal banned user}}
== A belated welcome! ==
{{banned user|by=the ]|link=]|link2=]}}


{{archive box|
]Here's wishing you a ] ], Reguyla. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for ]. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Misplaced Pages:
*]
* ]
}}{{clear}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

Also, when you post on ] you should ] using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on ], consult ], or place {{tl|helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome!


—] (]) 21:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)<!-- Template:Welcome-belated -->
:Thank you very much. ] (]) 23:04, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

== Thank you ==

I just wanted to say thank you to those that voted in my ban review. Special thanks go out to ] for requesting the review as well as ] and ] for their outstanding job moderating the review and their closing remarks. ] (]) 23:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

== Edit Filter ==

{{Ping|NawlinWiki}}
Thank you, I believe there are at least 4 filters with something to do either with my name or the words Ban or Abuse. I don't remember what it said but there was a few times that I triggered 3 or 4 edit filters at one time. ] (]) 08:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
:After reviewing the names of the edit filters and the timeframes of my edits, any one of the following could contain something related to me. Unfortunately I cannot narrow it down farther.
::102, 260, 294, 466, 579, 611, 619, 623, 624, 628. I hope this helps. ] (]) 09:12, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
::Adjusted #102. The rest were responding to those horrible things you were saying ;) , not to your name. ] (]) 12:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
:::Great thans for looking. ] (]) 12:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

== Comment about the standard offer ==

I am going to try my best not to comment at obvious trolling, but in case anyone looked here for a comment, since I cannot edit the discussion where it was made, I wanted to clarify a comment that Roger Davies made. The Arbcom, at no time, offered me a "standard offer". In fact, they consistently told me that the decision was not theirs to make, that they wouldn't make it even if it was and that it was a community decision and BASC denied my request repeatedly.

Aside from that, I just want to put this tragic tale of abuse and corruption behind me. Too much time and resources were wasted on the Kumioko Witch hunt by everyone including me. Regardless of any offers that may or may not have been made in the past, I beleive in this project (eventhough I believe it has lost its way in many respects) and it was obvious that members of it were willing to employ any tactic and inflict any casualties in order to keep me out. This "deal" was, IMO, a reasonable compromise for everyone to move on and for everyone to save some face and for the collateral damage to the project and its members and potential future members to cease. The damage that was being inflicted through edit filters, range blocks and unnecessary reversions of edits, as well as my comments and emails was causing uncalculable damage to the project and I felt it needed to end. I for one am glad it did.] (]) 12:38, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
*See you in six months, Reguyla. ] (]) 04:36, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
**Thanks, I hope thats true. There is still a lot of opportunity and desire for people to blame me for stuff or ] my account so we'll see. ] (]) 14:09, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
***And now it's one day less: we're making progress. Try and forget old griefs, if you can, or as much as you can: both sides will need to do so, since rehashing it will only make them fester. Take it easy, ] (]) 18:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
**** = "Yuuuuup. Kumioko writes some great content." Lol, no wonder I was banned. You too Drmies, take care. ] (]) 19:34, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
:In 6 months, ''if'' you haven't socked/evaded your ban, I'll support re-instatement. See, I'm not inflexiable :) ] (]) 19:32, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
::No worries ] I can easily stop myself from socking. As I stated in the review the only reason I did it was because I considered the original ban and how it was carried out to be illegitimate and simply ignored it, but I still went out of my way not to hide who I was eventhough some tried to prevent me from signing. So you don't need to worry about the '''if's''' of me socking. The problem is there are still folks out there who will try and make it look like me, and I created accounts from a lot of public places that could appear like socking if someone else creates an account there. So we'll see how long it is before someone finds something to accuse me of. You may not be one of them, but there are some clever individuals in the community that don't like me and will try and make sure I don't come back. ] (]) 13:18, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

== ] ==

I found some strangeness on a redirect if anyone is watching this page and wants to fix it. Take a look at ]. Its an article and a redirect all in one. Maybe we should choose one or the other? ] (]) 20:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
:Fixed it. Thanks for spotting, looks like someone didn't quite know how to do the move they intended to. ] (]) 15:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
::Your welcome and thats kind what I thought too. ] (]) 16:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

== Obvious copyright problems on ] ==

Here is another article problem for anyone who may be interested. ] appears to be mostly a cut and past copyright/plagiarism violation from the "reference" websites. The article itself meets notability but it needs a pretty much complete rewrite. ] (]) 20:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
:No offense, and I'll be glad to see you back when scheduled, but talk pages of blocked users should not be used for purposes other than discussing your block. I'm sure everyone appreciates your effort, but perhaps you'd be better keeping your attention away from en.wikipedia until your block expires. Regards, ] (]) 21:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
::No offense taken but doesn't really reflect someone who would welcome me back in 6 months. I do find it rather ironic though that in my review several admins and contributors attempted to convince other members of the community that I am not here to "build an encyclopedia", when any idiot who looks at my contribution history can clearly see that is bullshit (especially since my contributions exceed the vast majority multiple times over) and every effort is being made to prevent me from doing that. But oh well, no use crying over spilt Vodka. I also appreciate the suggestion that I take a break but unfortunately (or fortunately depending on how you wish to interpret it) I use Misplaced Pages almost everyday and often multiple times. Its also well known where I work that I "Used to" edit fervently so a lot of people bring problems like this to me that they think might need attention. Technically your right though and I am not just dropping every problem I see, I ignored multiple incidents of vandalism and other problems and only dropped 2 here that were sufficiently worthy to invoke ]. But if the climate has changed on the project and copywritten material and plagiarism are less concerning than in the old days feel free to ignore my suggestion. Worse case scenario this is just a note to myself and in 6 months when the interests of the project take precedence over abuse and Misplaced Pages politics, the changes will still be here and I will take care of them then. ] (]) 23:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

== Stuff that needs done ==

I am making these notes for myself. If someone sees them and feels compelled to do them, great, if not, I will fix upon my return from banishment.
#] is a person and needs the Persondata template, an infobox and birth and death cats. ] (]) 20:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
#Copyright and plagiarism problems on ]. ] (]) 20:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
#The Theresa Gallagher linked under Judges ] is not an actress so this link is not correct. ] (]) 19:55, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
#] has misplaced redirect syntax at the bottom of the introduction section. ] (]) 20:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
#], the last line under sequel doesn't make any sense. ] (]) 00:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
#] reads like a resume and needs to be cleaned up and rewritten. Need to make sure this is vetted through other members of the community to ensure no conflict of interest.] (]) 14:39, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

== Acceptable use of talk page while banned ==

Per our ]:

:"'''Unless otherwise specified, a ban is a site ban. An editor who is site-banned is forbidden from making any edit, anywhere on Misplaced Pages, via any account or as an unregistered user, under any and all circumstances. The only exception is that editors with talk page access may appeal in accordance with the provisions below.'''"

The provisions include:

* Post an appeal or comment there and ask (by email or other off-site means) for it to be reposted to the appropriate discussion.
* Appeal by email directly to the Arbitration Committee

Taking personal notes or asking others to edit for you are not allowed. The whole "'''If someone sees them and feels compelled to do them'''..." does not get around this.

You are being asked now to respect the terms of the ban and avoid Misplaced Pages for 6 months. Any inappropriate use of your talk page could be used to argue against your reinstatement and can result in the loss of talk page privileges. ] 14:44, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
:With respect, per my interpretation of my ban review my "ban" was changed to a 6 month block and the rules governing what is allowable use of a talk page is different with blocks or bans. I am making notes on my talk page of edits that need to be done to '''improve''' Misplaced Pages and its articles. I am not trolling, commenting on discussions, or doing anything that a reasonable person would find objectionable. If people are no longer interested in building and improving an encyclopedia, then please let me know. Otherwise I have not violated any policies with leaving comments on my talk page. If policy is more important than identifying edits that need to be made to improve the project though, then feel free to remove my talk page access. If however you are more interested in improving the project as I am and writing content then enforcing a fairly petty and stupid rule simply out of process then I think that is a shame. ] (]) 15:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:10, 14 April 2017

Wikimedia Foundation LogoConsistent with the Terms of Use, Reguyla has been banned indefinitely by the Wikimedia Foundation from editing all Wikimedia sites.
Please direct any questions to ca@wikimedia.org.
Account information: block logcontribslogsabuse logCentralAuth
This user has been banned from editing the English Misplaced Pages by the community. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking.
(block log · contributions · diff of closure · archived copy and log)
Archiving icon
Archives

Category: