Misplaced Pages

User talk:The Banner: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:15, 16 September 2014 editSeemantraj (talk | contribs)7 edits →Subhash Ghai - Career Section Edit: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:24, 9 January 2025 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,379,819 editsm Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:The Banner/Archives/2025/January. (BOT) 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{NOINDEX}} {{NOINDEX}}

''']'''

{{Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines|uncollapsed}} {{Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines|uncollapsed}}
] ]<br/>
{{WP:TPS/watched}}<br/><br/><br/>

{{clear both}}
<div class="toccolours" style="float:right;margin-left:2em;width:240px;{{#ifeq: {{BASEPAGENAME}} | {{SUBPAGENAME}} ||position:relative;top:-1.2em;}}">
]
{{Archive box|box-width=238px|search=yes|], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]}}

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=User talk:The Banner/Archives/ |archiveprefix=User talk:The Banner/Archives/
|format=Y/F |format=Y/F
|age=672 |age=144
|index=yes |index=yes
|archivebox=yes |archivebox=yes
|box-advert=yes |box-advert=yes
}} }}
</div>


== A barnstar for you! == == Cahercommaun ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Dear User "The Banner",
I really appreciate your work on Michelin star restaurants in the Netherlands. It is a superb source of data. Actually, together with a colleague, we would like to use this data for a research project. I have some additional questions related to the data and it would be great if we could get in contact about it. I have created the Misplaced Pages account "Researchguy11", but I am not sure if Misplaced Pages allows for communication and/or if you are interested in sharing your insights on Michelin star restaurants and your documentation efforts. If so, maybe you can write me on my "Researchguy11" page. Thanks and all the best! ] (]) 10:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
|}

== Point of grammar ==

On ], you said "I'm inherently bias as I'm the person who wrote the article." You are not bias. Bias as a noun means a particular tendency or inclination, especially one that prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question; prejudice. You are not the tendency. You may be subject to the tendency.

Bias as a verb means to cause partiality or favoritism in (a person); influence, especially unfairly which is what you appear to be trying to communicate has happened.

To be correct, you would say "I'm inherently biased.." using the past ] tense of the verb bias as the object of the verb "to-be" meaning you are subject to that partiality. A participle is a verb that modifies the noun. In this case, the verb is bias, and the noun is you.

Hope this helps. ] 16:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
:Hmmm, that is not my text... <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 16:44, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
:: Duh. My bad. <deliberate use of poor grammar> ] 16:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
:::{{smiley}} <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 17:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

== Deletion of MJ Mohamed Iqbal Page ==

Dear Banner,

Mr. Iqbal is well known personality as well as Islamic scholar in UAE (In Dubai). Iqbal is living in Dubai serving to Tamil and Islamic Society in so many ways. I can prove by providing photographs, Unfortunately very few web links are available at this moment. He is a freelance writer and he had been written so many articles in different topics, and they were published in magazines, newspapers, tabloids etc.

Iqbal is deserve to be in Misplaced Pages. Please advise what I should do to put about him back to Misplaced Pages. Your advise is very much appreciated. ] (]) 17:40, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
:No one has a ''right'' on a Misplaced Pages article. Both times now you have failed to prove that mr. Iqbal is notable. That is the problem. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 17:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

In what way you are expecting to prove him? I really don't understand, Only web links can decide a persons notability? ] (]) 21:04, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

== Cavern airfield ==

Hello,
why did you nominate it for deletion?
What is wrong?
] (]) 19:30, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
:Double text, no need for a separate article. You can read that on the nomination page. And I note this page on the Dutch Misplaced Pages: ] <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 19:35, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

But its not a dubble text. The cavern airfield was a project, it was not built. In this project the aircrat should start inside the mountain trough a tunnel like runway. the aircraft caverns (the article woh is said as dubble) are built and locatet on diffrend geographical locations. by aircraft caverns the aircrat did not start inside the caverns, the aircraft have to be pullet out by aircraft tugs and have to taxi to the runnway.
] (]) 19:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

== ''The Signpost'': 20 August 2014 ==

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-08-20}}
</div><!--Volume 10, Issue 32-->
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
* ''']'''
* ]
* ]
* ] (]) 20:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
</div></div>
<!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=622395093 -->

== Nitramrekcap: SPI ==

Following Drmies' advice at ] I filed an SPI for the new IP emanation of the same: ]

The new IP is blocked already --] (]) 13:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

== Edit warring in organic food ==

Hi The Banner. This is to give you a friendly reminder that your recent reverts over at ] fall into edit warring when you ignore either requests to discuss content at the article talk page or discussions that have already taken place. It looks like you've been an editor long enough to know better, so I'll spare the links to relevant pages in the hopes that the behavior was just a temporary mishap in judgement. When editors are asking for content to be set aside for a moment for a breather so discussion can occur about resolving content discrepancies, it's not particularly helpful to stir things up with pointy reverts while not engaging in the discussion after being asked to do so. If you feel strongly about something, bring it to the talk page (and follow the discussion that's already occurred) rather than relying on reverting and edit summaries outside the discussion. ] (]) 01:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
:I am not edit warring and you know that. The fact that you guys remove everything what is positive is making the article POV, and you and friends are to blame for that. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 09:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

::Continuing to revert while ignoring the article talk page after being repeatedly asked to bring concerns there is one of the very definitions of edit warring, not to mention disruptive. Positive or negative content has never been brought up for the issue being discussed, and it's quite difficult to say the content in question is either positive or negative. The wording and content itself are rather neutral. It's been an issue of sourcing as the current content being discussed doesn't have a source directly supporting it due to synthesis issues as multiple users have pointed out now. It seems like you might have some other ax to grind with your deleting positive content remark, so I highly suggest ] for a bit and look into what's actually being discussed at the article. ] (]) 14:09, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
:::You keep removing stuff and I have to step back? Are you kidding? You are now the one edit warring! <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 14:34, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
::::I removed the content as part of the ongoing discussion, especially ]. We're discussing the content, while you were reverting content without joining the conversation. So yes, I am asking you to step back ''and read the discussion'' (not leave) because of that. That is why I was reverting your reverts. The whole point of the article talk page is to discuss and come to consensus. Right now we have multiple editors pointing out a sourcing issue, and Redddbaron is at the very least discussing it without resorting to reverts. You weren't doing that. Ignoring that discussion is disruptive, and I've been trying to point out how the content issue can be remedied without disruptive editing. Just set the content aside temporarily and see how we can work on it in the talk page. That's all. ] (]) 15:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
:::::First removal and then talking when reverted is no serious attempt to get consensus. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 15:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
::::::At this point all I can say is drop the pitchfork and read the actual talk page conversation and what I've explained to you. You're getting a very different idea of what's going on than what we're actually trying to do. Settle, read, and then discuss on the article talk page if you have something constructive to add. I can't offer much more help than that at this point. ] (]) 15:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

== Pico de gallo ==

Hi. Thanks for trying to clean up the edit by the IP editor that I reverted earlier. However, you seem to have removed quite a lot of content from the previous versions of the article (before the IP editor came along), such as the whole "health issues" section. Also, quite a lot of the nonsense text remains, e.g., "fried ]s is an option, can be transformed easily into guacamole but is not replaced by this" and the claim that it is "paradoxical" (rather than, say, obvious and complementary) that wet salsa goes well with dry pork. Honestly, I think my revert was the right thing to do: the 22nd June version of the article was a higher quality article than the version that's there now. ] (]) 23:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
:In fact, everything about salsa can be throw out, as it is something different. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 10:42, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

== ''The Signpost'': 27 August 2014 ==

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-08-27}}
</div><!--Volume 10, Issue 33-->
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
* ''']'''
* ]
* ]
* ] (]) 10:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
</div></div>
<!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=623352396 -->

== Goodbye Miss Supranational. ==

Well - goodbye Miss Supranational. Finally, the heels have come off that particular meat show. Now we can start clearing out the dead wood. I've already XFD'd a couple of the winners and requested speedies for others. ] (]) 00:52, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
:I have the nasty feeling that many of those article are created or edited by sockpuppets/meatpuppets of user Mrdhimas. When you check google, you can see that he is a professional organiser of beauty pageants. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 11:36, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
:: Hey - For your info: I am trying to kick off a discussion at ], for your info. I think given the extent of the problem, we need some FIRM rules establishing. There has been a precedent in the past to consider individuals notable as national title-holders - and given that we have stubs on non-entity sportspeople who were once in a football team in the 1960s and never heard of again, I personally don't have a problem with these national title-holders having equivalent stubs (although I don't have to LIKE it.) ] (]) 11:24, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

== Your submission at AfC ] was accepted ==
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;">] '''], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br /> The article has been assessed as '''Stub-Class''', which is recorded on the article's ]. You may like to take a look at the ] to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to ]. {{#if:{{#invoke:IPAddress|isIp|1=The Banner}}
|You may wish to consider ] so you can create articles yourself
|Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can ], and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to ] if you prefer
}}.
* If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''.
* If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
] <sup>]•]</sup> 07:19, 4 September 2014 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk-->

:I am truly amazed and delighted. Thank you very much. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 10:19, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

== Please comment on ] ==

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 13777 --> ] (]) 00:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

== ''The Signpost'': 03 September 2014 ==

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-09-03}}
</div><!--Volume 10, Issue 34-->
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
* ''']'''
* ]
* ]
* ] (]) 08:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
</div></div>
<!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=624185220 -->

== Re: Thirteen ==

I appreciate ], but the article did not get promoted unfortunately, so they are unnecessary.--] (]) 18:17, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

:Furthermore, you never made a comment supportive or unsupportive of promotion, so I am curious as to whether you believe the article was FA-ready or not. Thanks--] (]) 18:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
::Oops, you are right, it was the article Megadeth that got promoted. Even when I had know that there was a vote, I would not have voted. As stated in my comment, I do not know anything about Megadeath and do not appreciate the music. So, I would not have been able to judge it. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 18:47, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

:::Ah, ok. Well, in any case, I appreciate your input on the review. Happy editing--] (]) 20:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

== Please comment on ] ==

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 13933 --> ] (]) 00:03, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

== Please comment on ] ==

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 14085 --> ] (]) 00:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

==George Tiller==

Excuse me! The NYTimes article specifically says that he struggled with substance abuse, overcame his addiction and served on the Kansas Medical Society's committee on impaired physicians. The only thing I have added is the fact that the substances in question were prescription pain killers. ] (]) 07:23, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
:Nor the painkillers, nor the addiction is mentioned in the article, so you should not mention it. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 07:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


hey @] you reverted my changes and removed credible sources from the page, may I ask why?
:::OK, I have reposted it without the words "addiction" or "pain killers". Just words used in the NYT article.


the article's lead says it's "sometimes ''Cahercommane"'' which is as I found the page, but I added a source from Clare Libary: https://www.clarelibrary.ie/eolas/coclare/places/the_burren/cahercommane.htm
:::Dr. Tiller's success in overcoming his addiction and his service on the impaired physicians committee were a source of pride for him, and should be mentioned in any biographical article about him. ] (]) 07:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


You removed this.
::::QUESTION: Are you ok with my transferring the discussion of the O'Reilly factor's comments on Dr. Tiller to its own section? I don't think it belongs in the CAREER section; O'Reilly's opinions have nothing to do with Dr. Tiller's career! Also, I have added a paragraph detailing Dr. Tiller's board certification, professional membership, and staff position to the CAREER section. If you revert these entries, please leave a note on my TALK page explaining why. Thanks. ] (]) 08:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


Then the archaeological section is referring to a study from a 1934 excavation without recent developments.
== Bad faith ==


Since then, the historian Gibson (professor of anthropology with a Phd in irish chiefdoms) has written an academic dissertation in 1990 identifying this site as the capital of the chiefdom of ''Tulach Commáin'' ("The Mound of Commán" a once locally revered chief, anglicised to Commane).
Copied from another post: We have ] as a guideline, ignored by you on dozens of such articles. It is not rocket science to google each of these names. Major American Newspapers, otherwise known as ] are doing coverage of each contestant. There is also a ton of gossip chatter. To say there is nothing but Facebook is a misrepresentation of the facts. The worldwide pageant is nothing but a publicity event centered around these contestants. For that one week, they are celebrities. For a different period of time, each of them is a national celebrity in their homeland winning the national pageant. What completely irks me is I have to spend hours of my time rescuing each of these articles separately, getting deep into a subject I care little about, because you have spread this damage around in little pieces, instead of taking this subject as a whole and making one reasonable discussion that I probably would have missed. Now I have to search, copy, paste. This could have been avoided with a little effort on your part but apparently removing content (justified or not) from wikipedia is more important to you. That is bad faith. Misplaced Pages does not prosper with editors behaving like this. ] (]) 18:42, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
:Misplaced Pages is not an advertising medium. Misplaced Pages is also wider than the USA. That you don't agree, okay, but stop assuming bad faith. Most of them have a very temporarily fame and are just notable for one event. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 21:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
*I got a "notification" of mention thingie but don't see my name here. Anyhow, what Trackinfo is saying explains why he is pissed. It is not a surprise. Winning a nation's primary beauty pageant is simply a big deal in current world culture. Far more than being a footie player who appears in a few games in 1972 for Manchester United or won a bronze medal at the 1904 Olympics, i.e., the thousands and thousands of "one event" instances which are never thought to fall under that policy.--''']''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">]</span></sup></small> 14:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
**Not in my opinion. It is just a preliminary round, not a separate event. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 15:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


His work is quoted by many scholars, I've added this point again with many sources.
== ''The Signpost'': 10 September 2014 ==


No worries if this was just an oversight—happy to discuss further if needed!
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-09-10}}
</div><!--Volume 10, Issue 35-->
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
* ''']'''
* ]
* ]
* ] (]) 21:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
</div></div>
<!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=625385134 -->


K
== Please comment on ] ==
] (]) 13:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:Outdated source and poor sources. It looks more like wishful thinking then proper sources. Westropp is only reliable for his drawings but beside that he made a lot of mistakes and misconceptions. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 15:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::Yes the information on the current page is outdated as I said it's from a 1934 excavation.
::The links I inserted is the recent research, Gibson also published a book in 2012 on Irish Chiefdoms specifically on this subject. ] (]) 15:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Another source National library of Ireland referred to as Cahercommane
:::: https://catalogue.nli.ie/Collection/vtls000742581/HierarchyTree?recordID=vtls000742581 ] (]) 15:34, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::::Monument Name: Cahercommane
::::https://clarelibrary.ie/eolas/coclare/archaeology/CL010-06403-.htm
::::Your objection to adding credible sources to the page and deleting my redirect link is unfounded Sir ] (]) 15:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::Too bad that you keep referring to Westropp. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 15:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::You don't seem to grasp that names in Ireland are often referred to by different spellings.
::::::Even historically, chiefdoms to quote gibson were known by a multiplicity of names.
::::::I've lived in this area all my life and it's always been referred to this way.
::::::For example, look at this site: https://www.logainm.ie/en/22342 and scroll down to Historical References there's about 20 different spellings if you look at the different years.
::::::If you're not going to allow credible sources on the page then I will have to escalate the issue. ] (]) 15:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Is that a threat? Or a promise that you start a new excavation soon? <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 15:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Ow, and read "Burren archaeology : a tour guide" by historian Hugh Carthy. Worth a read. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 16:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::Will check it out.
::::::::No threat. I don't think I'm being unreasonable here, so if we can't agree, other opinions will be needed and I will be opening a case. ] (]) 16:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::objecting to my redirect link.... why? ] (]) 16:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::That is clearly stated in the nomination. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 16:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::I've just explained why you're mistaken. ] (]) 16:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:https://en.wiktionary.org/commane interesting! dictionary describes ''commane'' an alternative form of ''commaun''
:there is no misconception or mistake—except, perhaps, in your stance. ] (]) 19:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)


== Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment ==
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 14217 --> ] (]) 00:02, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 01:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
== Subhash Ghai - Career Section Edit ==


== ] ==
Hi, First of all I am sorry for again editing the page without checking your message. I have informed this to TheRedPenOfDoom. Source Link : http://muktaarts.com/subhash-ghai/ . Please guide me if I am not following the correct way. Thanks, ] (]) 06:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you reverted a reference to nonstop year-round service on United for ] due to non-independent reference. This was taken directly from the airport's official website, so unclear why this is not considered a primary source. Can you elaborate on what should be used instead or why this reference is not acceptable? Looking forward to your response, thank you. ] (]) 17:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
:The issue is that it is not an independent source. The airport has a clear commercial interest in the connection and so in unsuitable as source, Please take a look at ]. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 18:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:24, 9 January 2025


User talk:The Banner/Airport vandal

Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?)
Content (?)
P
G
Conduct (?)
P
G
Deletion (?)
P
Enforcement (?)
P
Editing (?)
P
G
Style
Classification
Project content (?)
G
WMF (?)
P
I try to the best of my knowledge and belief to contribute to the small red block of the image


Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.




My archives
Part 1: Old archives, organised per year.
Part 2: Current archives, organised per month
Archiving icon
Archives

Archive 2011, Archive 2012, Archive 2013, Archive 2014, Archive 2015, Archive 2016, Archive 2017, Archive 2018, Archive 2019, Archive 2020, Archive 2021, Archive 2022, Archive 2023


This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.



Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Cahercommaun

hey @The Banner you reverted my changes and removed credible sources from the page, may I ask why?

the article's lead says it's "sometimes Cahercommane" which is as I found the page, but I added a source from Clare Libary: https://www.clarelibrary.ie/eolas/coclare/places/the_burren/cahercommane.htm

You removed this.

Then the archaeological section is referring to a study from a 1934 excavation without recent developments.

Since then, the historian Gibson (professor of anthropology with a Phd in irish chiefdoms) has written an academic dissertation in 1990 identifying this site as the capital of the chiefdom of Tulach Commáin ("The Mound of Commán" a once locally revered chief, anglicised to Commane).

His work is quoted by many scholars, I've added this point again with many sources.

No worries if this was just an oversight—happy to discuss further if needed!

K Kellycrak88 (talk) 13:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Outdated source and poor sources. It looks more like wishful thinking then proper sources. Westropp is only reliable for his drawings but beside that he made a lot of mistakes and misconceptions. The Banner talk 15:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Yes the information on the current page is outdated as I said it's from a 1934 excavation.
The links I inserted is the recent research, Gibson also published a book in 2012 on Irish Chiefdoms specifically on this subject. Kellycrak88 (talk) 15:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Another source National library of Ireland referred to as Cahercommane
https://catalogue.nli.ie/Collection/vtls000742581/HierarchyTree?recordID=vtls000742581 Kellycrak88 (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Monument Name: Cahercommane
https://clarelibrary.ie/eolas/coclare/archaeology/CL010-06403-.htm
Your objection to adding credible sources to the page and deleting my redirect link is unfounded Sir Kellycrak88 (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Too bad that you keep referring to Westropp. The Banner talk 15:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
You don't seem to grasp that names in Ireland are often referred to by different spellings.
Even historically, chiefdoms to quote gibson were known by a multiplicity of names.
I've lived in this area all my life and it's always been referred to this way.
For example, look at this site: https://www.logainm.ie/en/22342 and scroll down to Historical References there's about 20 different spellings if you look at the different years.
If you're not going to allow credible sources on the page then I will have to escalate the issue. Kellycrak88 (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Is that a threat? Or a promise that you start a new excavation soon? The Banner talk 15:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Ow, and read "Burren archaeology : a tour guide" by historian Hugh Carthy. Worth a read. The Banner talk 16:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Will check it out.
No threat. I don't think I'm being unreasonable here, so if we can't agree, other opinions will be needed and I will be opening a case. Kellycrak88 (talk) 16:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
objecting to my redirect link.... why? Kellycrak88 (talk) 16:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
That is clearly stated in the nomination. The Banner talk 16:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
I've just explained why you're mistaken. Kellycrak88 (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
https://en.wiktionary.org/commane interesting! dictionary describes commane an alternative form of commaun
there is no misconception or mistake—except, perhaps, in your stance. Kellycrak88 (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Misplaced Pages talk:What Misplaced Pages is not on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Princess Juliana International Airport#Passenger

Hi, I saw you reverted a reference to nonstop year-round service on United for Washington-Dulles due to non-independent reference. This was taken directly from the airport's official website, so unclear why this is not considered a primary source. Can you elaborate on what should be used instead or why this reference is not acceptable? Looking forward to your response, thank you. PAE2008 (talk) 17:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

The issue is that it is not an independent source. The airport has a clear commercial interest in the connection and so in unsuitable as source, Please take a look at WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. The Banner talk 18:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)