| Revision as of 15:02, 17 September 2014 editHelenOnline (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,295 edits ani notice← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:53, 2 September 2022 edit undoGidonb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users95,886 edits object | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Note == | |||
| {{Rollback topicon | |||
| |icon_nr=1}} | |||
| {{reviewer topicon | |||
| |icon_nr=2}} | |||
| {{CVU topicon|status=member|icon_nr=3}} | |||
| {{Twinkle topicon | icon_nr =4}} | |||
| Not that it will make much difference in your day-to-day, but I've retired the "anti-filibuster" sanction that I placed on you in August 2018, so that no longer applies. The other sanctions are set to expire soon. {{pb}}Unrelated, but I remember in the previous site-ban discussion MONGO proposed some sort of reverse topic ban where you'd limit yourself to editing only 5 articles. That might be a starting point for an unblock...getting those articles to GA with no drama could be used as evidence to appeal for a less restrictive ban. I dunno...maybe it's a bad idea, but it's a start. <span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~] <small>(])</small></span> 19:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for stopping by! | |||
| == Unblock request closed == | |||
| Here in Misplaced Pages, I go by "Winkelvi". I enjoy patrolling the ] page, looking for vandalism by IP addresses. As a ], I'm also often reviewing and then either accepting or rejecting pending changes. While I try to be accurate with the reverts I make and the subsequent warnings I leave on talk pages, I am only human and will make mistakes from time to time. '''If you're here because of an editing issue or a revert I've made to one or more of your edits and you feel I've made an error, please leave me a '']'' message on my ]'''. | |||
| You have likely seen this already, but I should probably notify you that I have your unblock request as unsuccessful. Please read the comments there carefully before any subsequent requests. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] (])</span> 19:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| When you leave a message on my talk page and a response from me is appropriate, I will reply to you here, not on your talk page. Having half a conversation on a talk page and going back and forth between pages is unnecessarily confusing and a pain in the ass. | |||
| == Sockpuppet investigation == | |||
| If you're here to whine, complain, or express anger, please go elsewhere. | |||
| You have been mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Winkelvi&redirect=no ] (]) 22:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| One last thing: Some administrators and non-admin regular joe editors are great, some are total assholes. Some administrators have had the tools way to long and some editors take themselves way too seriously. Too many of the aforementioned have totally lost the idea behind the "anyone can edit" philosophy. If at all possible, they are best to be avoided. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <br> | |||
| <br> | |||
| {{User:UBX/Aspergers}} If you've had any kind of issue or misunderstanding in your dealings with me, there is an excellent article/essay on Misplaced Pages editors with Asperger's found ] that might help. | |||
| <br> | |||
| <br> | |||
| {{Like|username=Winkelvi}} | |||
| <br> | |||
| <br> | |||
| == The Barnstar of Dilegence == | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Trump Baby Balloon at protest in Parliament Square.jpg== | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For keeping up with and reporting countless Monterrosa socks, I award you The Barnstar of Dilegence! ] (]) 01:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |}<!--Template:The Barnstar of Diligence--> | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 10:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| I humbly thank you, ] and will keep up the good fight! -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 02:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == If you are watching this page == | |||
| == Possible help == | |||
| Winkelvi - I think you should respond to the accusations of socking, especially if you are innocent. If you don't defend yourself, it will be assumed that you are guilty which makes it doubtful the community will allow you to return...provided you even want to return. j/s ] <sub>]</sub> | |||
| Winkelvi, given how you've been able to keep up with all those Monterrosa socks, perhaps you could help myself, {{noping|STATicVapor}}, {{noping|Homeostasis07}}, and {{noping|IndianBio}} track socks of a user named {{noping|Reece Leonard}}? To give some background, Reece is a user who last month got topic-banned from ] articles for persistently trying to make it seem as though critics responded more positively than they actually did (i.e. changes "mixed reviews" to "positive reviews") for her album '']''. Last week he got blocked for three days for ban evasion for trying to promote more positive reviews on ''Artpop'' (for which CheckUser confirmed a sock and the sock account was indef blocked) and afterwards just got blocked for a week for using an IP to remove negative reviews from the ''Artpop'' song "]" (another ban evasion attempt). While bans and blocks are separate things, I'm sure you can spot either type of evasion in users. You can talk to any of the other three people I mentioned for further details. ] (]) 06:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ] 15:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| : Even being completely truthful and saying it's not me, I'm pretty sure nothing I do at this point will mean squat. I recall being called a liar here numerous times, by regular editors and admins, when I wasn't lying, but being totally honest. I'm not wanted in Misplaced Pages, that's been plain since even before my indef, in addition to the subsequent denial of request to return, and now being "tried" and tagged as a sockmaster solely on circumstantial "behavioral" evidence by a relatively new editor and admin/CU with whom I've never interacted when I was editing. How anyone can believe they are knowledgeable of someone's behavior without ever experiencing that person's behavior is beyond my understanding and logic, but the result is what it is. Misplaced Pages as a mostly anonymous community has shown me it is unforgiving and the normal rules of the real world don't apply. Based on all that, I think trying to defend myself, drawing up a case, and being hopeful for a return to editing would be a complete waste of everyone's time and end only in disappointment for me. | |||
| ==Request For an Opinion== | |||
| Hi, Winkelvi. I apologize for some of the past disagreements we've had, and I'd very much like to say I value your opinion and appreciate your help. Hopefully there are no hard feelings between us. I'm dropping this message here to let you know I'd like to cite video interviews for the purpose of expanding the ] page and its related pages. I've taken a look at ] and ], and I don't think video interviews are barred from being used as sources. It would be very helpful as there's a lot of information in the video interviews that does not exist in any other medium. I've left a message on the Sound of Contact talk page for further discussion of the issue. | |||
| I do thank you for caring, though. '''<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span>''' ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 16:41, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| I'd like to ask if you'll approve of this before I get to work on adding information to the pages. Thanks! :) ] (]) 07:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I am so sorry you left. You were my friend :( ] <span style="color:Purple">(2020)</span> ] 18:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Good thing that got cleared up. Some folks see the boogeyman under the bed, in the closet, behind the couch.--] (]) 00:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ==Because you deserve it== | |||
| :Winkelvi was mean to me during the sockpuppet investigation that got me blocked 4 years ago. ] <span style="color:Purple">(2020)</span> ] 21:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I know that tracking sockpuppets and filing the appropriate reports is time consuming so your efforts with the socks of Monterossa are much appreciated. Cheers ] | ] 17:59, 27 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |}{{z147}} | |||
| 😂 ] (]) 11:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| This is awesome - especially the knight's suit of armor. Thanks, ]. I will wear it proudly! -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 18:14, 27 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| For the record, I object to ''any'' unblocking of this user! ] (]) 21:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Please Check Your Comments at ] == | |||
| I may be mistaken, but it appears that another editor edited your comments at ] in which you advised him to drop the stick and back away from the dead horse. If so, the other editor was guilty of a serious talk page violation. ] (]) 21:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you, Robert. I did replace them with a new sig and time/date stamp. Appreciate the notification. I'm really, really tired of the drama. Would rather just talk it out on the article talk page and edit the article. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 21:36, 2 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Edits by Enter333 == | |||
| Thanks for nominating the "world cinema filmographies" category as mentioned above. | |||
| ] seems to have left a lot of other unexplained edits which need reviewing and in many cases reverting. I left questions at ] but he has simply blanked the page. Someone had better look through them all. Would you be prepared to do it, please? – ] '''<font color="#FF0000">]</font>'''] 22:15, 6 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Yes. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 22:21, 6 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Done. Hopefully it was done correctly and I didn't screw anything up :-) -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :{{smiley}} Thanks a lot! – ] '''<font color="#FF0000">]</font>'''] 08:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Please help == | |||
| Hi, on May 8 and May 9 you correctly intervened to stop this editor (http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:74.66.11.71) from inserting poorly sourced content that did not adopt a neutral tone into the article on Shael Polakow-Suransky. After several attempts by you and other editors the page was temporarily protected. Now it appears the same editor has returned and is using the signature Hashtag411, to insert the exact same content you removed a few weeks ago and has attempted to vandalize other parts of the page by removing large sections of sourced content. These attempts have currently been undone by other editors but someone with more experience may need to intervene again. ] (]) 12:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Reviewer granted == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. Your account has been granted the "<tt>reviewer</tt>" userright, allowing you to ] on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at ], while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at ]. | |||
| Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. | |||
| ''See also:'' | |||
| *], the guideline on reviewing | |||
| *], the summary of the use of pending changes | |||
| *], the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.<!-- Template:Reviewer granted --> — ] ] 04:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC) — ] ] 04:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you, ]. I appreciate the confidence and trust you've expressed in granting this permission. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 05:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for the heads up == | |||
| Thanks for the heads up about using the edit box. I have been trying to be more diligent in using it. However, I sometimes click save before I realized I have entered the information of the material I have added. :-) | |||
| I do have one question. Where did you find the info on Kevin Tighe's wife? I have not found a good source to cite that. Just curious. | |||
| Thanks again! | |||
| I am trying to understand your logic for the edits on Kevin Tighe's page. Can you clarify as they do not make sense on some levels. We got blasted by another bot for using IMDB.. Which means we have had to use other sources. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :My edits have been well explained in the edit summaries. The prose you have written is in many ways not encyclopedic in tone, there has been redundancy in content, some of it out of place, some of it extraneous, some of it just not encyclopedic at all. Some of it has been lifted from online sources (for example, "bohemian lifestyle"). I plan to further copy edit the article over the next several days, so working cooperatively on this is a must. IMDB is not a reliable source, it cannot be used. In the future, it would be best for you to question edits and rationale on the article's talk page. Thanks. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 04:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Just wanted to say that I apologize if edit summary comes off as rude. The actors and filmmakers project recommended avoiding "best known" for a number of reasons years ago. FWIW I am old enough to have watched ''Emergency!'' in its original run and, thus, was happy to see Kevin show up in ''Lost''. Thanks again for all you work with the Monterrosa sock situation earlier today. Cheers. ] | ] 04:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::It did come off as rude, but I'll get over it. I, too, am old enough to remember Emergency in its original run. I know better than to put in "best known", and must have been asleep at the wheel. Thanks for fixing it. You're welcome for the Monterrosa dealings, and thank you for being there to help with the needed reversions. While reverting him was certainly justified, I didn't want to get dinged for edit warring ("even if you think you're right"). Best, -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 04:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You are welcome as well. Best regards. ] | ] 05:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == I think I'll choose my words better if this comes up again. == | |||
| I feel regretful that I wasn't more transparent at the time about where I was suggesting we consolidate discussion. I thought you had a strong case, as I said earlier, and I suspected a broader conversation would help support it. Next time I'll try to be clearer...I'll try to learn from this as well. I understand the frustrations and I think you ultimately dealt with the consequences maturely and with class.] 04:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Ah, no worries. It was my fault for not clicking on the link rather than thinking I knew where the link went. I appreciate your support in this and a cooler head prevailing. On favor to ask: would you mind taking the identifying info for Kelly Clarkson's baby out of the Clarkson article? I fear if I do it, me removing it will be used against me later for an edit warring behavior claim by someone in particular. I imagine there are going to be some hard feelings for a while that I didn't get equal blocking treatment, if you know what I mean. Thanks again! -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 05:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| I am sorry for the issue with the LCMS Foundation page, I was trying to create a new article, this issue arose as I am not experienced with editing Misplaced Pages. I will work on the article in my sandbox and submit it once it is complete. If you have any advice I would appreciate it. | |||
| Thank you, ] (]) 23:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] and ] == | |||
| You have taken care of the problem with the material by adding a source for the contentious material you readded to the talk page. You are wrong though in your edit summary you left when reverting my removal, "It's-talk page. Unsourced material can be placed on and talked about on a talk page." The policy on ] is very specific that it applies to everything on any page within Misplaced Pages. It says in the third paragraph of the lead, "This policy applies to any living person mentioned in a BLP, whether or not that person is the subject of the article, and to material about living persons in other articles and on other pages, including talk pages." It goes on to say in the ] section, "Remove immediately any contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced;" That material is contentious and it was unsourced when I removed so it did not belong even on the article's talk page. ] ] 16:46, 19 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I saw it as un-contentious because it was well publicized, that's why I reposted it. Finding a source for it was easy. I think the editor has a good, valid question: why isn't this in the article? Especially sine Campbell's wife says now the DUI was when she noticed something was "off" about her husband and now attributes his behavior surrounding the DUI with his current and deteriorating condition. I felt you were shutting down discussion. That's why I left the edit summary and put the content back on the article talk page. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 16:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Robin Williams/Marin reversion == | |||
| Hi Winkelvi! | |||
| I saw your notice regarding one of my edits. Please allow me to elaborate on my thinking: | |||
| I don't know if, like myself, you are also a native of Marin County. If so, please rest assured that the following explanation is not intended to be interpreted as condescending in any way, and please count this preamble as my apology. I truly do not mean to offend or patronize. | |||
| Having grown up in Marin County, in the local vernacular that I experienced, "Marin" when used by itself, was, almost without exception, interpreted as being short for Marin County, as opposed to any other phrase. I would wager to say that many and possibly most (though of course not all by any means) Marin County natives would have assumed that a reference to "Marin" would refer to the county rather than the college. An example of this local usage can be seen in this article's headline, sub-headline (if that's what it's called?) and first couple paragraphs: | |||
| http://www.marinij.com/marinnews/ci_26325538/marin-residents-share-stories-fond-memories-comedian-robin | |||
| That is why I found it potentially confusing as originally written, and did the edit. | |||
| Even if "Marin" is taken to refer to the College of Marin, as indeed the wider non-native audience might, I thought that my edit also improved readability (albeit VERY slightly!) by eliminating redundancy. I realize (now) that I forgot to include that in my edit summary. | |||
| Anyway, that was my thinking. :) Given the above, does my edit make more sense now than it did when you saw it? | |||
| ] (]) 02:09, 23 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I appreciate you coming here to express your opinion. I think, however, that because you are reading the article as a Marin County native, you are not reading it as someone completely unfamiliar with the area would. That in mind, your reading is possibly subjective rather than objective. Nonetheless, I'll take another look at how it's worded in the article. Again, thanks for your comments. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 02:12, 23 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == No personal attack == | |||
| I did not make any personal attack on ]. What I said was the truth. Read his comment properly. The whole comment is written in very poor English. I couldn't even understand the last part of his comment earlier. Also instead of censoring comments as you did on ] should have instead simply said that I should not make such comments. Please before removing a comment in future think properly and rationally. ] (]) 07:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes you did, ]. What you said was your opinion, expressed in a personal attack. It doesn't matter what his comment was, it matters that yours was inappropriate and against policy. And for the record, I was thinking just fine: properly as well as rationally. Please before leaving a comment about an editor, ask yourself if it could be seen as a personal attack, then, if you answer 'yes', don't leave that comment. We are to comment on edits not editors. For more, please read ]. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 07:09, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Did I meant to insult him? I didn't I suggested that he improve his English as it was somewhat not understandable. What's wrong in that? When I cannot understand a comment due to poor language is it my fault or the one who has commented? ] (]) 07:12, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::From what I'm reading here, English is obviously not your first language. It is obvious to me that the problem is not with the native English speaker's writing (the editor you insulted), but the English Language Learner (you) and limited ability to comprehend what you are reading. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 07:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Oh wow is that the only excuse you could think of? Well uh try to comprehend this line "It doesn't help they come from difference marriages, as it makes it complexicated to give even a simply entry." It's not my fault that I can't understand it properly. The user has himself not written it in proper English. ] (]) 04:56, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Snippiness == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| You wrote | |||
| : {{od}}Would it be too much for you, ], to not be rude and just ask if the discussion can go elsewhere? ] came here looking for help, and that's what I've been trying to do. We aren't really talking specifically about the article, anyway. We are talking about referencing. That spans Misplaced Pages entire, not just the article you two are editing. If you want to take this to the article talk page from here on out, feel free. But your tone is really unnecessary. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 9:06 pm, Today (UTC−7) | |||
| You're absolutely correct, my comment to you was unnecessarily rude and harsh. My apologies. ] (]) 07:01, 26 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Quick question == | |||
| Hi Winkelvi, | |||
| My question isn't related to any particular article or edit. Rather, it's about Misplaced Pages itself, and I have no idea how to contact someone who can definitively answer my question, which is this: | |||
| Fairly recently (maybe just a couple months ago?) it used to be that the search box on the English Misplaced Pages homepage used to offer predictive suggestions when one began to type in the box, much as the search box in the upper-right hand corner when browsing just about any other Misplaced Pages page does. | |||
| But now, it's once again just a simple search box, with no predictive suggestions, as far as I can tell. Do you have the same experience? I've no idea where I might go to ask such a general question and/or make a suggestion for the return of this feature. Maybe you might be able to point me in the right direction? I thought I'd run it past you to see if I was the only one who noticed this apparent change. | |||
| Thanks!] (]) 18:31, 31 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Without doing some research, I have no idea (at this moment) how to help you, ]. BUT, you could probably go to the technical side of the Misplaced Pages Town Pump here and ask the folks over there. Good luck! -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 18:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 03 September 2014 == | |||
| <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-09-03}} | |||
| </div><!--Volume 10, Issue 34--> | |||
| <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] (]) 08:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| </div></div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=624185220 --> | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 10 September 2014 == | |||
| <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-09-10}} | |||
| </div><!--Volume 10, Issue 35--> | |||
| <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] (]) 21:57, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| </div></div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=625385134 --> | |||
| ==ANI discussion== | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ]] 15:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:53, 2 September 2022
Note
Not that it will make much difference in your day-to-day, but I've retired the "anti-filibuster" sanction that I placed on you in August 2018, so that no longer applies. The other sanctions are set to expire soon.
Unrelated, but I remember in the previous site-ban discussion MONGO proposed some sort of reverse topic ban where you'd limit yourself to editing only 5 articles. That might be a starting point for an unblock...getting those articles to GA with no drama could be used as evidence to appeal for a less restrictive ban. I dunno...maybe it's a bad idea, but it's a start. ~Awilley (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Unblock request closed
You have likely seen this already, but I should probably notify you that I have closed your unblock request as unsuccessful. Please read the comments there carefully before any subsequent requests. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
You have been mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Winkelvi&redirect=no Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Trump Baby Balloon at protest in Parliament Square.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Trump Baby Balloon at protest in Parliament Square.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 182.239.120.76 (talk) 10:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
If you are watching this page
Winkelvi - I think you should respond to the accusations of socking, especially if you are innocent. If you don't defend yourself, it will be assumed that you are guilty which makes it doubtful the community will allow you to return...provided you even want to return. j/s Talk 📧 15:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
: Even being completely truthful and saying it's not me, I'm pretty sure nothing I do at this point will mean squat. I recall being called a liar here numerous times, by regular editors and admins, when I wasn't lying, but being totally honest. I'm not wanted in Misplaced Pages, that's been plain since even before my indef, in addition to the subsequent denial of request to return, and now being "tried" and tagged as a sockmaster solely on circumstantial "behavioral" evidence by a relatively new editor and admin/CU with whom I've never interacted when I was editing. How anyone can believe they are knowledgeable of someone's behavior without ever experiencing that person's behavior is beyond my understanding and logic, but the result is what it is. Misplaced Pages as a mostly anonymous community has shown me it is unforgiving and the normal rules of the real world don't apply. Based on all that, I think trying to defend myself, drawing up a case, and being hopeful for a return to editing would be a complete waste of everyone's time and end only in disappointment for me.
I do thank you for caring, though. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 16:41, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- I am so sorry you left. You were my friend :( cookie monster (2020) 755 18:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Good thing that got cleared up. Some folks see the boogeyman under the bed, in the closet, behind the couch.--MONGO (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Winkelvi was mean to me during the sockpuppet investigation that got me blocked 4 years ago. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
😂 Second Skin (talk) 11:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
For the record, I object to any unblocking of this user! gidonb (talk) 21:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)