Misplaced Pages

User talk:Lecen: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:31, 4 October 2014 editBedsBookworm (talk | contribs)180 edits Hello: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:28, 10 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,688 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Lecen/Archive 23. (BOT)Tag: Manual revert 
(375 intermediate revisions by 76 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
}} }}
{{-}} {{-}}
== October 2014 ==


Hello. I recently gave a point of view on ]. You removed what I had written and claimed I may be a sock puppet. I wanted to confirm that I am not (just not a super active editor unless I see something I can improve) but given my inexperience with Misplaced Pages editing and not wanting to start an edit war. I just wanted to ask if there is something I did wrong and if I am not allowed to give my point of view on that topic. My apologies for contacting you like this, I want to take this as a learning opportunity. Thanks -- ] (]) 07:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span>
:I will indeed request a sock puppetry in your case. I'm amazed that an account was reactivated after three years and with the sole purpose of participating in a move request. --] (]) 14:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
::You might be right. But it's not your judgment to make. ]] 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
*<nowiki>provinces, since they depended on the port of Buenos Aires to export. Discontentment grew within.</nowiki>{{red|'''&#123;'''}}<nowiki>{sfn|Lynch|1981|p=202} On 28 February 1839 the province of Corrientes revolted and attacked both</nowiki>
:{{U|Hakimsheriff}}, I've restored your comment, which should not have been removed. Lecen, you were way out of line removing it. ]] 08:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 0, 1, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 21:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
::I tried really hard, but despite all of it... I couldn't care about what you said. --] (]) 14:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
:::You'll care if you're blocked. Don't remove others' comments again based on your vague suspicions. ]] 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
::::Nope. I still won't care. Threats such as that is the reason why I stopped writing for Misplaced Pages. It's the en encyclopedia's loss, not mine. You'll have to try harder. --] (]) 16:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
:::::Your inability to learn to follow policies and guidelines is the reason you stopped writing, I suspect; that removing others' posts is a no-no (]), as are accusations without evidence (]), is stuff you learn the first week. I agree it's unfortunate, but if you can't learn to get along then you're no use to the project. ]] 17:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
::::::No SPI report, I see. Huh. ]] 01:59, 16 November 2019 (UTC)


{{-}}
== Warning ==

] Please stop your ], as you did at ]. Your edits have been ] or removed.
* If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ].
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being ]. ''

Your behavior of ] towards other points of view as well as your poor use of talk page to discuss this disagreement will get you blocked.''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] <small>(])</small> 00:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

:This is the second time you've threatened me for opposing your attempts to remove sourced info and replace it with unsourced text, as well as for pushing your POV. Are you sure you want to keep doing it? --] (]) 00:59, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

::Lecen, this is something that you are escalating and I have to confess you are doing a great job in getting on my nerves. Tomorrow I'll start a request for comments o a request in the Dispute resolution noticeboard to discuss this phobia you have with the revisionist movement. In the meanwhile, I ask you to ''please'' refrain from introducing further modifications to the article. '''Please, show some good faith.''' Thank you. --] <small>(])</small> 01:10, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

:::I'm sorry: are telling me not to edit the article? Are you accusing me of editing on bad faith? Are you saying that you're getting nervous because someone didn't accept your attempts to remove sourced information? --] (]) 01:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

::::I'm asking you to not to edit the article until we get this sorted out, yes. The rest of your rant is terribly wrong. BTW, this incident could've been prevented if you wouldn't have ignored me at ]. --] <small>(])</small> 01:21, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

:::::So, you felt ignored, and angered by that you started to remove sourced content? Is that correct? I don't know if you noticed, but I answered each of your questions. --] (]) 01:23, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

::::::No, that's not correct. And no, you didn't. --] <small>(])</small> 04:37, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for October 3==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

== Hello ==

Glad to see you editing again. ] (]) 12:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:28, 10 November 2024


Archives (Index)


Hello. I recently gave a point of view on Talk:Luiz_Inácio_Lula_da_Silva#Requested_move_8_November_2019. You removed what I had written and claimed I may be a sock puppet. I wanted to confirm that I am not (just not a super active editor unless I see something I can improve) but given my inexperience with Misplaced Pages editing and not wanting to start an edit war. I just wanted to ask if there is something I did wrong and if I am not allowed to give my point of view on that topic. My apologies for contacting you like this, I want to take this as a learning opportunity. Thanks -- Hakimsheriff (talk) 07:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

I will indeed request a sock puppetry in your case. I'm amazed that an account was reactivated after three years and with the sole purpose of participating in a move request. --Lecen (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
You might be right. But it's not your judgment to make. EEng 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Hakimsheriff, I've restored your comment, which should not have been removed. Lecen, you were way out of line removing it. EEng 08:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
I tried really hard, but despite all of it... I couldn't care about what you said. --Lecen (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
You'll care if you're blocked. Don't remove others' comments again based on your vague suspicions. EEng 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Nope. I still won't care. Threats such as that is the reason why I stopped writing for Misplaced Pages. It's the en encyclopedia's loss, not mine. You'll have to try harder. --Lecen (talk) 16:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Your inability to learn to follow policies and guidelines is the reason you stopped writing, I suspect; that removing others' posts is a no-no (WP:TPO), as are accusations without evidence (WP:PA), is stuff you learn the first week. I agree it's unfortunate, but if you can't learn to get along then you're no use to the project. EEng 17:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
No SPI report, I see. Huh. EEng 01:59, 16 November 2019 (UTC)