Revision as of 06:12, 5 October 2014 editPolentarion (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,662 editsm →History: starts now with 1945← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:54, 1 December 2024 edit undoCitationIsNeeded (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users760 editsm Updated short descriptionTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App description change | ||
(507 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Criticism/opposition to the European Union in the United Kingdom}} | |||
] (''dark green'') in the ] (''light green'').]] | |||
{{Outdated as of|yead=2022}} | |||
''']''', the opposition to the policies of supranational EU institutions and/or opposition to membership of the European Union, has been a significant element in the politics of the ] (UK) since the inception of the ]—comprising the ] (EEC), the ] (EAEC) and the ] (ECSC)—the predecessor to the ] (EU). | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2018}} | |||
{{Use British English|date=December 2018}} | |||
{{United Kingdom in the European Union}} | |||
{{Brexit sidebar}} | |||
'''] in the United Kingdom''' is a continuum of belief ranging from the opposition to certain political policies of the ] to the complete opposition to the ]’s membership of the European Union. It has been a significant element in the politics of the United Kingdom (UK). A 2009 ] survey of EU citizens showed support for membership of the EU was lowest in the United Kingdom, alongside ] and ].<ref name="Eurobarometer 71">{{cite web | url = http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/PublicOpinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/yearFrom/1973/yearTo/2009/surveyKy/829 | title = Standard Eurobarometer 71 (fieldwork June–July 2009) | access-date=26 November 2009|date=September 2009 | format = PDF | publisher = ] }}</ref>{{rp |91–3}} | |||
Levels of support for the EU have historically been lower in the UK than most other member states.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}} UK citizens are the least likely to feel a sense of ], and ] is also seen as more important to British people than that of people from other EU nations.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}} Additionally, the United Kingdom was the least integrated EU member state with ] – the most of any EU member state. | |||
== History == | |||
] pledged "Therefore I say to you, let Europe arise" ]] | |||
] | |||
] was held in 1975, with a majority voting in favour of continued membership of the EC (which later evolved into the ]). A ] was held in 2016, with a majority of voters voting to leave the ]. | |||
Britain was urged to join and lead western Europe in the very aftermath of the War. The ] and the ''European Conference on Federation'' led by ] were among the early endeveaours for European unity with British participation. | |||
However British governments and political mainstream players pledged for a stronger integration of the continent but did not intend to take part itself. Britain never had a strong pro-European movement as it has been founded in post-war Germany. The postwar years till 1954 saw the UK occupied with the dissolution of ist global Empire. It was not among the ] founding ] of the ] in the early 1950ies. The six signed the ] creating the ] on 18 April 1951 but failed to create a ]. | |||
The decision of the electorate to vote in favour of ] marks the first time in history that a member state has decided to leave the European Union. The UK ] the EU on 31 January 2020. | |||
In the years before, only the British extreme right, namely ] politician ] were rather outspoken, based on the ] and the ] slogan, for a stronger integration of Britain with Europe.<ref>Culture of Fascism: Visions of the Far Right in Britain, Julie V. Gottlieb, Thomas P. Linehan.B.Tauris, 31.12.2003, p.75</ref><ref>DRÁBIK, Jakub. Oswald Mosley´s Concept of a United Europe. A Contribution to the Study of Pan-European Nationalism. In. The Twentieth Century, 2/2012, s. 53-65, Prague : Charles University in Prague, ISSN 1803-750X</ref> The British Elites did not assume Great Britain should or could take part as a simple member in the European communities then.<ref name=dra>Drawn into the Heart of Europe?: Die britische Europapolitik im Spiegel von Karikaturen (1973-2008), Julia Quante, LIT Verlag Münster, 2013</ref> The reservation was less based on economic considerations. Already after the war European integration would have offset the decreasing importance of the intercommonwealth trade.<ref name=Geh /> The most important resistance was and is based on political philosophy.<ref name=Geh /> In the UK the concept of unlimited ], based on the British legal system and parliamentary tradition was and is of high esteem and interferes strongly with integration attempts into a continental legal framework.<ref name=Geh> From common market to European Union building, Michael Gehler, Böhlau Verlag Wien, 2009</ref> | |||
], a staunch opponent of European integration.]] | |||
The Labour Party party leader ] once declared that joining the European Communities would mean "the end of a thousand years of history".<ref>{{cite news | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/the_daily_politics/6967366.stm | title = Your favourite Conference Clips | date = 03-10-2007 | publisher = BBC | accessdate = 2011-09-17}}</ref> Some Gaitskellites though (including the later founders of the ]) were favourable to British involvement. Labour later changed from its initial opposition towards the European Community and began to support membership. As well important groups of Conservatives opposed British accession to the ]. One of the earliest groups formed against British involvement in Europe was the initially Conservative Party-based ], whose president ] declared that opponents of the Common Market did not want to "subject to a lot of frogs and huns".<ref name="BritPol">{{cite book | author = Lieber, R. J. | title = British politics and European unity: parties, elites, and pressure groups | year = 1970 | publisher = University of California Press | isbn = 978-0-520-01675-0 | page = 210}}</ref> Conversely, much of the opposition to Britain's EU membership initially came from ] politicians and trade unionists who feared bloc membership would impede socialist policies, although this was never the universal Labour Party opinion. | |||
==History== | |||
=== Impact of the Suez Crisis 1954 === | |||
After the events of the ] 1954 the United Kingdom had to accept that it could no longer assume to be a preferred partner of the ] and underwent a massive loss of trust in the ] with the US.<ref>Pax Anglo-Americana, ], Oldenbourg 1999, p.236</ref> Britain, along with Denmark, Ireland and Norway then started to prepar for a trade union, as in the ] (EFTA). British politicians as Labours ] were 1962 still of opinion, that Britain should not only be allowed to join, but be welcomed to lead the European Union, and met then with ridicule resp. neglection.<ref name=Geh /> | |||
In the ], an ideological divide between reverence for continental European refinery and classics and ] sentiment has existed for centuries; however, ] is different from the ] more prevalent in American culture.<ref name=ae>, Patrick Chamorel No 25, EUI-RSCAS Working Papers from European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS) 2004</ref> In the late 19th century, Britain's foreign policy stance of minimal involvement in European affairs was characterised as "]".<ref>Margaret Macmillan, ''The War That Ended Peace: The Road to 1914'' (2013) ch 2</ref> | |||
Although at present a significant proportion of ] are hostile to the European Union, it was the Conservative Party that took the United Kingdom into what then was the European Community. However in the 1960ies the UK faced a strong resistance from the continent, especially from French premier Charles de Gaulle. <ref name=dra>Drawn into the Heart of Europe?: Die britische Europapolitik im Spiegel von Karikaturen (1973-2008), Julia Quante, LIT Verlag Münster, 2013</ref> Instead of being offered a leadership role, Britain was put on a yearlong waiting list, a major political humilation for pro-European Britons. De Gaulles Veto 1963 was a devastating blow for ], <ref>This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair, Hugo Young, Overlook Press, 1998</ref> which, according ], was not the last Tory politician to end his or her career due to European affairs. The UK faced a major economic decline and a row of disturbing political scandals as well. The combination didn't help much with the image of Europe in the UK and vice versa. With ] replacing Charles de Gaulle, the veto was finally lifted and negotiations began in 1970 under the pro-European government of ]. Heath had to deal with disagreements relating to the ] and the remaining relationship with the ]. 1972 the accession treaties were signed with all but ]). | |||
The European Unity movement as a political project after 1945 was supported and inspired by British figures such as ] who pledged in his 1946 Zurich speech for "a kind of United States of Europe" led by France and Germany but who did not see a need to involve Britain.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/astonish.html|title=Winston Churchill speaking in Zurich, I9 September 1946|access-date=5 October 2014|archive-date=22 April 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120422233906/http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/astonish.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> The ambivalent position of Britain has been described as "wishing to seem to be a major part of Europe without wanting actually to take part".<ref name=dw>{{Cite book|title= Britain in the European Union Today|edition=3rd|last1= Watts |first1=Duncan|last2= Pilkington |first2=Colin|isbn=9780719071799|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=8XizwW0g2CkC |date= 2005|publisher= Manchester University Press}}</ref> The ] of European unity as a Continental issue and ] has been a recurrent theme.<ref name="Wolfram Kaiser 2009, p. 240">{{Cite book|title= From Common Market to European Union Building|last=Gehler|first=Michael| isbn=9783205777441|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=IbP_olB1gPgC|date= 2009|publisher= Böhlau|page=240|location=Vienna}}</ref> Pro-European British politicians and citizens have faced various defeats and humiliations with regard to Britain's steps in the direction of increased European integration.<ref name=plot/> Even parties like the ] with a clearly pro-European platform, have members that share the British lack of enthusiasms "of all things European".<ref>Britain in the European Union Today: Third Edition, Duncan Watts, Colin Pilkington, Manchester University Press, 29 November 2005, p.220</ref> After joining the EU, confrontational attitudes of British politicians, as in the ] controversy, gained further popularity among the British public, and many Britons feel a much stronger affection for the ] than they ever have for the EU.<ref name=dw/>{{Failed verification|date=June 2015}} | |||
=== Admission and referendum === | |||
Despite the decision to join the European Community, internal Labour divisions over EEC membership prompted the Labour Party to propose a referendum be held on the permanence of the UK in the Communities. Originally proposed in 1972 by ]<ref>Peter Oborne ''Daily Telegraph'', 23 January 2013</ref> (known as Anthony Wedgwood Benn at the time), Labour's referendum proposal led the anti-EEC Conservative politician ] to advocate a Labour vote (initially only inferred) in the February 1974 election,<ref>Simon Heffer ''Like the Roman: The Life of Enoch Powell'', London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998, p.707-10</ref> which was thought to have influenced the result, a return to government of the Labour Party. The eventual ] asked the voters: | |||
<blockquote>"Parliament has decided to consult the electorate on the question whether the UK should remain in the European Economic Community: Do you want the UK to remain in the EEC?"</blockquote> | |||
=== After 1945 === | |||
British membership of the EEC was endorsed by 67% of those voting, with a turnout of 64.5%. | |||
] (''dark green'') in the ] (''light green'')]] | |||
Britain was urged to join and lead Western Europe in the immediate aftermath of World War II. The ] and the European Conference on Federation led by ] were among the early endeveaours for European unity with British participation. Churchill also participated in the ], which discussed the future structure and role of a proposed Council of Europe.<ref name="Jenkins, p. 810 and p. 819-14" /> British governments and political mainstream players, while advocating stronger integration of ], did not intend to take part themselves. Britain never had a strong pro-European movement like the one founded in post-war Germany. During the postwar years up to 1954, the UK was occupied with the ] of its global empire. It was not among the six founding ] of the ] in the early-1950s (described as the "]"). The six member states signed the ], creating the ] (ECSC), on 18 April 1951; but failed to create a ]. | |||
Whilst ] was an early supporter of ]<ref name="Jenkins, p. 810 and p. 819-14">Jenkins, p. 810 and p. 819-14<sup>how can this be 819-14?</sup></ref> and called for a "United States of Europe" and the creation of a "Council of Europe",<ref name="Jenkins, p. 810 and p. 819-14" /> he did not have Britain join the ECSC in 1951. | |||
<blockquote> | |||
''We have our own dream and our own task. We are with Europe, but not of it. We are linked but not combined. We are interested and associated but not absorbed.''<ref name="quote-data">{{cite web | |||
| url = http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk | |||
| title = Remembrance Day 2003 | |||
| access-date = 25 April 2007 | |||
| publisher = Churchill Society London | |||
}}</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
In the years before, only the British extreme right – in particular, ] politician ] – were rather outspoken, based on the ] and the ] slogan, for a stronger integration of Britain with Europe.<ref>Culture of Fascism: Visions of the Far Right in Britain, Julie V. Gottlieb, Thomas P. Linehan.B.Tauris, 31 December 2003, p.75</ref><ref>DRÁBIK, Jakub. Oswald Mosley´s Concept of a United Europe. A Contribution to the Study of Pan-European Nationalism. In. The Twentieth Century, 2/2012, s. 53–65, Prague : Charles University in Prague, {{ISSN|1803-750X}}</ref> The British elites did not assume Britain should or could take part as a simple member in the European communities at that time.<ref name=dra>Drawn into the Heart of Europe?: Die britische Europapolitik im Spiegel von Karikaturen (1973–2008), Julia Quante, LIT Verlag Münster, 2013</ref> The reservation was based less on economic considerations, since European integration would have offset the decreasing importance of trade within the ] trade,<ref name=Geh /> but rather on political philosophy.<ref name=Geh /> In Britain, the concept of unlimited ], based on the British legal system and parliamentary tradition was, and is, held in high esteem and presents a serious impediment to attempts at integration into a Continental legal framework.<ref name=Geh>From common market to European Union building, Michael Gehler, Böhlau Verlag Wien, 2009</ref> | |||
The Labour Party leader ] once declared that joining the European Economic Community (EEC) would mean "the end of a thousand years of history".<ref>{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/the_daily_politics/6967366.stm| title = Your favourite Conference Clips| date= 3 October 2007| publisher = BBC| access-date=17 September 2011}}</ref> Some ] (including the later founders of the ]), were favourable to British involvement. Labour later moved from its opposition towards the European Community and began to support membership. Important groups of Conservatives also opposed joining the ]. One of the earliest groups formed against British involvement in Europe was the Conservative Party-based ], whose president ] declared that opponents of the Common Market did not want to "subject to a lot of frogs and huns".<ref name="BritPol">{{cite book| author = Lieber, R. J.| title = British politics and European unity: parties, elites, and pressure groups| url = https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_NjOXZdxMlAYC| year = 1970| publisher = University of California Press| isbn = 978-0-520-01675-0| page = }}</ref> Conversely, much of the opposition to Britain's EU membership came from ] politicians and trade unionists who feared bloc membership would impede socialist policies, although this was never the universal Labour Party opinion. In 2002, a minority of Labour MPs, and others such as ], formed the Labour Against the Euro group in 2002, opposing British membership of the single currency.<ref>, BBC News, 10 April 2002</ref> The ] remains strongly pro-EU.<ref>Patrick Wintour , ''The Guardian'', 16 January 2013</ref> | |||
===Impact of the Suez Crisis 1956=== | |||
Even before the events of the ] in 1956, the United Kingdom had faced strains in its relationship with the U.S. After the Suez conflict it had finally to accept that it could no longer assume that it was the preferred partner of the ] and underwent a massive loss of trust in the ] with the U.S.<ref>Pax Anglo-Americana, ], Oldenbourg 1999, p.236</ref> Britain, Denmark, Ireland, and Norway then started to prepare for a trading union, the ] (EFTA). British politicians, such as Labour's ] were in 1962 still of opinion, that Britain should not only be allowed to join, but be welcomed to lead the European Union, and met then with ridicule.<ref name="Wolfram Kaiser 2009, p. 240"/> | |||
In the 1960s, the membership attempts of Conservative UK governments faced strong resistance from the Continent, especially from the ], ].<ref name="dra"/> Instead of being offered a leadership role, Britain was put on a yearlong waiting list, a major political humiliation for pro-European Britons. De Gaulle's veto in 1963 was a devastating blow for ],<ref name=plot>This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair, Hugo Young, Overlook Press, 1998</ref> who, according to ], was not the last Tory politician to end his or her career as a result of European affairs. The UK faced a major economic decline and a row of disturbing political scandals as well. The combination did not help much with Europe's image in the UK, and vice versa. With ] replacing de Gaulle, the veto was lifted and negotiations began in 1970 under the pro-European Conservative government of ]. The question of sovereignty had been discussed at the time in an official document (FCO 30/1048) that became open to the public many years later in January 2002, under the ]. It listed among "Areas of policy in which parliamentary freedom to legislate will be affected by entry into the European Communities": Customs duties, Agriculture, Free movement of labour, services and capital, Transport, and Social Security for migrant workers. The document concluded (paragraph 26) that it was advisable to put the considerations of influence and power before those of formal sovereignty.<ref>FCO 30/1048, ''Legal and constitutional implications of UK entry into EEC'' (open from 1 January 2002).</ref> Among disagreements that Heath had to deal were those relating to the ] and the remaining relationship with the ]. In 1972 the accession treaties were signed with all but Norway.<ref>See ]</ref> | |||
===Admission and 1975 EC membership referendum=== | |||
{{main|1975 United Kingdom European Communities membership referendum}} | |||
{|class="wikitable" style="text-align:right; font-size:100%;" | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="4" bgcolor="#E9E9E9" align="center" | ]<br />'''1975 United Kingdom European Communities membership referendum''' <br />National result | |||
|- bgcolor="#09a8ff" align="center" | |||
! align="left" colspan="2" width="250" | Choice | |||
! width="80" | Votes | |||
! width="50" | % | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#24B14C" | | |||
| align="left" | '''Yes''' | |||
| '''17,378,581''' || '''67.23%''' | |||
|- | |||
| width="1" bgcolor="#DF0A24" | | |||
| align="left" | No | |||
| 8,470,073 || 32.70% | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="4" bgcolor="#E9E9E9" | | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" colspan="2" | Registered voters and turnout | |||
| 40,086,677 || 64.67% | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
Despite the decision to join the European Community, internal Labour divisions over EEC membership prompted the Labour Party to propose a referendum be held on the permanence of the UK in the Communities. Proposed in 1972 by ],<ref>Peter Oborne , ''Daily Telegraph'', 23 January 2013</ref> Labour's referendum proposal led the anti-EEC Conservative politician ] to advocate a Labour vote (initially only inferred) in the February 1974 election,<ref>Simon Heffer ''Like the Roman: The Life of Enoch Powell'', London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998, p.707-10</ref> which was thought to have influenced the result, a return to government of the Labour Party. The eventual ] asked the voters: | |||
<blockquote>Do you think the United Kingdom should stay in the European Community (the Common Market)?</blockquote> | |||
British membership of the EEC was endorsed by 67% of those voting, with a turnout of 64.5% and was a major defeat for the anti-marketers at the time with only two of the 68 counting areas returning "No" majority votes. | |||
===From 1975 to 1997=== | ===From 1975 to 1997=== | ||
], Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990, was considered as a symbol of Euroscepticism. She was an opponent of the ], which was ratified by the UK in 1993.]] | |||
The debate between ] and EU supporters is ongoing in British political parties, whose membership is of varied standpoints. The two main political parties in ], the Conservative Party (in government) and the Labour Party (in opposition) both have within them a broad spectrum of views concerning the European Union. | |||
The debate between Eurosceptics (known as anti-marketeers until the late 1980s) and EU supporters (known as pro-marketeers until the late 1980s) is ongoing within, rather than between, British political parties, whose membership is of varied standpoints. The two main political parties in Britain, the Conservative Party and the Labour Party, each have within them a broad spectrum of views concerning the European Union. | |||
] (PM 1979-90), shown here with ] at Camp David in 1986, favoured stronger ties with the US over the European Community.]] | |||
In the 1970s and early 1980s the Labour Party was the more Eurosceptic of the two parties, with more anti-European Communities MPs than the Conservatives. In 1975, Labour held a special conference on British membership and the party voted 2 to 1 for Britain to leave the European Communities.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/26/newsid_2503000/2503155.stm | work=BBC News | title=1975: Labour votes to leave the EEC | date=1975-04-26 | accessdate=2010-05-02}}</ref> In 1979, the Labour manifesto<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/area/uk/man/lab79.htm |title=Political Science Resources: politics and government around the world |publisher=Psr.keele.ac.uk |date=2011-05-05 |accessdate=2011-12-11}}</ref> declared that a Labour government would "oppose any move towards turning the Community into a federation" and, in 1983,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/area/uk/man/lab83.htm |title=Political Science Resources: politics and government around the world |publisher=Psr.keele.ac.uk |date=2011-05-05 |accessdate=2011-12-11}}</ref> it still favoured British withdrawal from the EEC. Under the leadership of ] after 1983, however, the party dropped its opposition to the European Communities and instead favoured greater British integration into ]. Since the speech by Jacques Delors, then President of the ], at the TUC conference in 1988 the Eurosceptic inclination in the Labour Party as a whole has become less pronounced.<ref name="Oborne">Peter Oborne , telegraph.co.uk, 21 April 2011</ref> In the context of ]'s Conservative premiership, when policies to reduce the power of the trade unions were pursued, Delors' advocacy of a "social Europe" became attractive to many.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/sep/12/bringbacksocialeurope |title=Bring Back Social Europe |accessdate=2008-09-04|last=Katwala |first=Sunder|date=2007-09-12|publisher=] | location=London}}</ref> In late October 1990, just before her premiership ended, Mrs Thatcher reacted strongly against Delors' plans for a single currency in the House of Commons;<ref>, BBC Democracy Live, 31 October 2009</ref> her stance contributed to her downfall a few weeks later.<ref>Charles C. W. Cooke ''National Review'', 23 July 2012</ref> | |||
In the 1970s and early 1980s, the Labour Party was the more Eurosceptic of the two parties, with more anti-European Communities MPs than the Conservatives. In 1975, Labour held a special conference on British membership and the party voted 2 to 1 for Britain to leave the European Communities, with more MPs supporting withdrawal than opposing it and only seven out of 46 ] supporting staying in the Common Market.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/26/newsid_2503000/2503155.stm| work=BBC News| title=1975: Labour votes to leave the EEC| date=26 April 1975| access-date=2 May 2010}}</ref><ref name=georgiou>{{cite journal |last1=Georgiou |first1=Christakis |date=April 2017 |title=British Capitalism and European Unification, from Ottawa to the Brexit Referendum |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/hima/25/1/article-p90_4.xml |journal=] |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=90–129 |doi=10.1163/1569206X-12341511 |access-date=14 September 2019|doi-access=free }}</ref> The views of many leaders and activists within the party were reflected by ], who claimed during the ] that unless Britain voted to leave, "half a million jobs lost in Britain and a huge increase in food prices (would be) a direct result of our entry into the Common Market".<ref name=georgiou /> In 1979, the Labour manifesto<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/area/uk/man/lab79.htm|title=Political Science Resources: politics and government around the world|publisher=Psr.keele.ac.uk|date=5 May 2011|access-date=11 December 2011}}</ref> declared that a Labour government would "oppose any move towards turning the Community into a federation" and, in 1983,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/area/uk/man/lab83.htm|title=Political Science Resources: politics and government around the world|publisher=Psr.keele.ac.uk|date=5 May 2011|access-date=11 December 2011|archive-date=25 May 1998|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19980525042836/http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/area/uk/man/lab83.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> it still favoured British withdrawal from the EEC. | |||
===Since 1997=== | |||
] leader ] is arguably the United Kingdom's most famous Eurosceptic campaigner and wants the UK to leave the ].]] | |||
The financier Sir ] had formed the ] as a single-issue party to fight the ], calling for a ] on aspects of the UK's relationship with the ]. It planned to contest every constituency where there was no leading candidate in favour of such a referendum, and briefly held a seat in the ] after ], the Conservative MP for ], changed parties in March 1997 following a battle against deselection by his local party. The party polled 800,000 votes and finished fourth, but did not win a seat in the House of Commons. The ], advocating the UK's complete withdrawal from the European Union, had been founded in 1993 by ], but initially had only very limited success. | |||
Under the leadership of ] after 1983, the then opposition party dropped its former resistance to the European Communities and instead favoured greater British integration into ]. | |||
Many commentators <ref>{{cite news| url=http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/06/07/uk.toriesfuture/index.html | work=CNN | title=Tories facing identity crisis | date=2001-06-08 | accessdate=2010-05-02}}</ref> believe over-interest in the issue to be an important reason why the Conservative Party lost the ]. They argue that the British electorate was more influenced by domestic issues than by European affairs. | |||
Former British prime minister from 1979 to 1990, ] gained much popularity with the ] in 1984. Britain then managed to reduce its contributions to the Union to a certain extent, as it was then the EU's second poorest member and, without much agriculture, benefited little from farm subsidies.<ref name=handbag>{{cite web|url=http://www.itnsource.com/shotlist//RTV/2005/12/16/RTV1755405/?s=zapatero |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006075940/http://www.itnsource.com/shotlist//RTV/2005/12/16/RTV1755405/?s=zapatero |url-status=dead |archive-date=6 October 2014 |title=Reuters footage |agency=Reuters |date=16 December 2005 |work=ITN Source archive |access-date=26 January 2013 |quote=Blair is under pressure to yield on the rebate won by his predecessor Margaret Thatcher in 1984 to reflect the fact that Britain, then the EU's second poorest member, benefited little from farm subsidies. }}</ref> | |||
A speech by ], ], at the TUC conference in 1988 helped to weaken the eurosceptic inclination in the Labour Party.<ref name="Oborne">Peter Oborne , telegraph.co.uk, 21 April 2011</ref> In the speech, he argued for ] and for all workers to be covered by ]s. In response, the formerly eurosceptic union leader ] declared that "in the short term we have not a cat in hell’s chance in Westminster. The only card game in town at the moment is in a town called Brussels". As President of the Commission, Delors pushed for stronger pan-European regulations in areas including industrial relations, health and safety, the environment and consumer protection. In addition he played a key role in the incorporation of the ] into the ], enshrining a series of workers' rights into ].<ref name=georgiou /> In the context of Thatcher's Conservative premiership, when policies to reduce the power of the trade unions were pursued, Delors' advocacy of a "social Europe" became attractive to many.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/sep/12/bringbacksocialeurope|title=Bring Back Social Europe|access-date=4 September 2008|last=Katwala|first=Sunder|date=12 September 2007|website=]| location=London}}</ref> In 1989, the Labour Party officially dropped support for a withdrawal from the EEC: by 1998, only three per cent of the party's MPs supported leaving the EU.<ref name=georgiou /> | |||
After the electoral defeat of the UK Conservatives in 2001, the issue of Eurosceptism was important in the contest to elect a new party leader. The winner, ], was seen as more Eurosceptic than his predecessor, ]. As opposition leader, Iain Duncan Smith attempted to disaffiliate the British Conservative ] (MEPs) from the federalist ] group. As MEPs must participate in a transnational alliance to retain parliamentary privileges, Duncan Smith sought the merger of Conservative MEPs into the Eurosceptic ] (UEN) group. Conservative MEPs vetoed this move because of the presence within the UEN of representatives of ] parties who do not share similar domestic politics. In 2004, Duncan Smith's successor, ], emphasised that Conservative MEPs would remain in the EPP Group so as to maintain influence in the ]. However Michael Howard's successor ] pledged to remove Conservative MEPs from the EPP Group and this has now been implemented. | |||
The UK rebate was also held up by Thatcher's successors as prime minister.<ref name=handbag /> Thatcher had worked with Delors in building a single market and supported the ] of 1986, but by 1988 believed that the single market would cause greater political integration which she opposed. That year she warned in the ] of "a European super-state exercising a new dominance from Brussels".<ref name="kuper20190620">{{Cite news |url=https://www.ft.com/content/85fc694c-9222-11e9-b7ea-60e35ef678d2 |title=How Oxford university shaped Brexit — and Britain's next prime minister |last=Kuper |first=Simon |date=2019-06-20 |work=Financial Times |access-date=2019-06-21 |language=en-GB | url-access=subscription}}</ref> In late October 1990, just before her premiership ended, Thatcher reacted strongly against Delors' plans for a single currency in the House of Commons.<ref>, BBC Democracy Live, 31 October 2009</ref> Her stance contributed to her downfall a few weeks later,<ref>] , '']'', 23 July 2012</ref> but Thatcher influenced others such as ], whose Oxford Campaign for an Independent Britain (1990) may be the start of the Brexit campaign.{{r|kuper20190620}} | |||
In 2005, ] MEP requested that the ] disclose where individual Commissioners had spent their holidays, which the Commission rejected on the basis that they had a right to privacy. Eurosceptics have also criticised the ], ], for spending a week on the yacht of the Greek shipping billionaire ] only a month before the Commission approved €10.3 million of Greek state aid for Latsis' shipping company.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article223215.ece | work=The Independent | location=London | title=Barroso survives confidence debate over free holiday with Greek tycoon | first=Stephen | last=Castle | date=2005-05-26 | accessdate=2010-05-02}}</ref> However, this decision had been made by the previous Commission body, before Barroso had been appointed.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article223215.ece | location=London | work= The Independent | first=Stephen | last=Castle | date=2005-05-26}}</ref> | |||
==== Role of the Post-Maastricht Blues ==== | |||
UKIP received 16% of the vote and gained 12 MEPs in the ]. The party's results improved in the ], coming in second, above the incumbent Labour Party.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/elections/euro/09/html/ukregion_999999.stm | work=BBC News | title=European Election Results 2009, UK Results | date=2009-04-19 | accessdate=2010-05-02}}</ref> | |||
The overall acceptance of the European Union in all member states saw a strong increase of support till the 1990s and a major decline afterwards, support sinking to 1980s levels then.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|publisher = VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften|date = 1 January 2009|isbn = 978-3-531-15969-0|pages = 50–68|language = de|first = Bernhard|last = Weßels|editor-first = Frank|editor-last = Decker|editor-first2 = Marcus|editor-last2 = Höreth|doi = 10.1007/978-3-531-91336-0_4|title = Die Verfassung Europas|chapter = Spielarten des Euroskeptizismus}}</ref> Due to the timely connection with the ] 1992, it has been called the ''post-Maastricht-Blues''.<ref name=":0"/><ref>Eichenberg, Richard/ Russell J. Dalton (2007): Post-Maastricht Blues: | |||
The Transformation of Citizen Support for European Integration, 1973–2004, in: Acta Politica 42(2–3), P. 128–152. (quoted in Weßels 2009)</ref> The ] faced a major defeat with the failed ] and eurosceptical opinions gained more impact overall. The role of public opinion had been lower before but gained importance with state referendums, as in the rejection of the constitution by French and Dutch voters in 2005.<ref name=":0"/> | |||
===Since 1997=== | |||
==Criticism of the European Union== | |||
The financier Sir ] formed the ] as a single-issue party to fight the ], calling for a referendum on aspects of the UK's relationship with the ]. It planned to contest every constituency where there was no leading candidate in favour of such a referendum, and briefly held a seat in the ] after ], the Conservative MP for ], changed parties in March 1997 following a battle against deselection by his local party.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}} The party polled 800,000 votes and finished fourth, but did not win a seat in the House of Commons. The ] (UKIP), advocating the UK's complete withdrawal from the European Union, had been founded in 1993 by ], but initially had only very limited success. Due to a change in the election principle, the ] allowed for the first ]. Over-interest in the issue may have been an important reason why the Conservative Party lost the ]; they argued that the British electorate was more influenced by domestic issues than by European affairs.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/06/07/uk.toriesfuture/index.html| work=CNN| title=Tories facing identity crisis| date=8 June 2001| access-date=2 May 2010}}</ref> | |||
Individual complaints about the EU made by Eurosceptics include rising costs of membership,<ref name="CostsT">{{cite news | url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8417255/300-a-year-the-cost-to-each-taxpayer-of-funding-EU.html | title = £300 a year: the cost to each taxpayer of funding EU | publisher = The Daily Telegraph | author = Winnett, R. & Waterfield, B. | date = 2011-03-31 | accessdate = 08-06-2011 | location=London}}</ref> a negative impact of the EU regulatory burden on UK business (including pointing out that this also affects those businesses engaged in purely domestic trade or exporting to non-EU markets) and claimed corrosive effects on democracy within all EU member states, including Britain.<ref name="DemCor">{{cite news | url = http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1228769/MAIL-COMMENT-EU-democracy-lose-relentless-expansion-continues.html | title = EU 'democracy' and why we always lose as its relentless expansion continues | publisher = Daily Mail | date = 2009-11-18 | accessdate = 02-08-2011 | location=London}}</ref> | |||
After the electoral defeat of the UK Conservatives in 2001, the issue of Eurosceptism was important in the contest to elect a new party leader. The winner, ], was seen as more Eurosceptic than his predecessor, ]. As opposition leader, Iain Duncan Smith attempted to disaffiliate the British Conservative ] (MEPs) from the federalist ] group. As MEPs must participate in a transnational alliance to retain parliamentary privileges, Duncan Smith sought the merger of Conservative MEPs into the Eurosceptic ] (UEN) group. Conservative MEPs vetoed this move because of the presence within the UEN of representatives of ] parties who do not share similar domestic politics. In 2004, Duncan Smith's successor, ], emphasised that Conservative MEPs would remain in the EPP Group so as to maintain influence in the ]. Michael Howard's successor ] pledged to remove Conservative MEPs from the EPP Group and this was implemented.{{citation needed|date=June 2015}} | |||
===Democratic deficit=== | |||
{{See also|Democratic deficit in the European Union}} | |||
Many British Eurosceptics believe that the ] overly restricts national parliaments' freedom to legislate. They also object to provisions that EU legislation must be proposed by the ], which they claim lacks democratic legitimacy because it is elected by the ]<ref>]</ref> and not directly by voters. | |||
<!--The EU Council of Ministers (which also has a major legislative role) is traditionally viewed as representing the national interest against that of the supranational institutions, the Commission and the Parliament but, Eurosceptics{{Who|date=June 2011}} argue, the Council of Ministers, being a legislative body composed of ministers allows national governments to legislate in a way which bypasses the separation of powers that exist in many Continental countries' national legislatures and to cut out the domestic opposition completely. | |||
UKIP received 16% of the vote and gained 12 MEPs in the ]. The party's results improved in the ], coming in second, above the incumbent Labour Party.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/elections/euro/09/html/ukregion_999999.stm| work=BBC News| title=European Election Results 2009, UK Results| date=19 April 2009| access-date=2 May 2010}}</ref> In the ], UKIP support reached a new high water mark in England, coming first ahead of the Labour party, and gaining 26.6% of the vote, but on a very low unmotivated voter turnout of just 35.4 per cent. | |||
By legislating at EU level, it is claimed{{By whom|date=June 2011}}, governments in power are able to enact legislation that remains binding on future governments, and for these reasons the EU Council of Ministers is alleged to have a marked tendency to support the expansion of the body of EU law, even in matters that might be thought to be of a purely domestic nature, thus resulting in a steady loss of the legislative powers of national parliaments and with it the power of national electorates to influence the law at the ballot box, with an increasing range of unpopular policies (e.g. the ]) not being discussed at all in election campaigns because the election result cannot affect them. Given the self-interest of the various EU institutions, Eurosceptics {{Who|date=June 2011}} argue, it is highly unlikely that they would all agree to any reform to remedy this institutional bias towards over-legislating at EU level. PLEASE PUT THESE PARAGRAPHS BACK WHEN ALL THE CLAIMS THEREIN HAVE BEEN REFERENCED.--> | |||
== "Awkward partner" status == | |||
===Claims of corruption=== | |||
Professor Stephen George states in his 1990 book ''An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community'' that the UK is an "awkward partner" within the European Union, emphasising that although the UK is not the only EU member state to oppose further EU integration, it is less enthusiastic than most other members.<ref name="George1990">{{cite book|author=Stefan George|title=An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-EC0AAAAIAAJ|year=1990|publisher=Clarendon Press|isbn=978-0-19-827563-3}}</ref> Factors contributing to "awkward partner" status include the distinctiveness of the identity and ] in contrast to that of ]. According to a 2003 profile in '']'', historian ] favoured a British withdrawal from the EU in favour of creating "a much looser association of English-speaking nations, known as the ].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Brown |first=Andrew |date=15 February 2003 |url=http://books.guardian.co.uk/poetry/features/0,12887,902797,00.html |title=Scourge and poet|work=The Guardian}}</ref> Examples of closer ties include the ] with the US. Additionally, the UK has not experienced the major political upheavals of continental Europe.<ref name=UKGovPol>{{cite book|last1=Lynch|first1=Philip|last2=Fairclough|first2=Paul|title=AS UK Government and Politics|date=2013|publisher=]|isbn=978-1-4441-8352-8|pages=339–340|edition=Fourth|chapter=The European Union}}</ref> | |||
Opponents of the EU have accused its politicians and ] of corruption and failing to get the EU's accounts signed off by the ].<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/11/14/do1402.xml | work=The Daily Telegraph | location=London | title=Why aren't we shocked by a corrupt EU? | first=Daniel | last=Hannan | date=2007-11-14 | accessdate=2010-05-02}}</ref> | |||
British government officials have often been hostile towards further European integration, supporting intergovernmental cooperation as opposed to supranational authority, and a single market rather than the ].{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}} Great importance has also been attached to the defence of ], i.e. where ultimate decision-making authority is located in the United Kingdom as a nation state.<ref name=UKGovPol /> | |||
Excerpts from the report and accounts on 2011<ref>http://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/INAR11/INAR11_EN.PDF</ref> include: | |||
*The 2011 accounts present fairly the financial position of the European Union and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year. Revenue and commitments were free from material error. In contrast, payments were affected by material error, with an estimated error rate of 3,9 % for the EU budget as a whole. The level of error remained similar to 2010 when it was 3,7 %. | |||
*All individually assessed areas of EU spending were affected by material error with the exception of external relations, aid and enlargement and administrative expenditure. This shows that improvements are needed in the management of EU funds. | |||
*Overall, the control systems examined were only partially effective in ensuring the regularity of payments and are not realising their potential to prevent or detect and correct errors. Many instances of control failure were identified. | |||
The UK has also experienced limited influence in EU negotiations; on key EU policies (e.g. the EMU), British governments have not set the agenda but reacted to proposals from others by attempting to slow the pace of integration, or limit its impact. Although influential in some areas – e.g. the single market and defence – the UK is often in a minority of states opposed to change, and has not developed durable alliances to counter the Franco-German partnership.<ref name=UKGovPol /> | |||
A minority of Labour MPs, and others such as ], formed the Labour Against the Euro group in 2002, opposing British membership of the single currency.<ref>, BBC News, 10 April 2002</ref> The TUC remains strongly pro-EU,<ref>Patrick Wintour ''The Guardian'', 16 January 2013</ref> but some of Labour's opponents in the media claim ], the shadow chancellor, is privately a Eurosceptic.<ref name="Oborne"/><ref>Daniel Knowles , telegraph.co.uk, 4 November 2011</ref> Opposition to the European Union is generally more marked in the Conservative Party, with all leaders from ] (1990–97) onwards having to placate the Eurosceptics in the party. | |||
The UK does not have the consensus among the ] of the country on the benefits of EU membership, as opposed to other EU member states. As Andrew Williamson notes, the issue has caused divisions within ] in the past and ] today, and is most prominent in the Conservatives and the ] (UKIP).<ref name=UKGovPol /><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/the-case-for-brexit-lessons-from-1960s-and-1970s|title=The case for Brexit: lessons from the 1960s and 1970s|last=Williamson|first=Andrew|date=5 May 2015|website=History & Policy|access-date=13 July 2016}}</ref> | |||
==Eurosceptic political parties== | |||
{{see also|Category:Eurosceptic parties in the United Kingdom}} | |||
Levels of support are lower in the UK than most other member states, as well as having less knowledge about the institution. UK citizens are the least likely to feel a sense of ], and national sovereignty is also seen as more important to British people than that of people from other EU nations, with many major newspapers taking Eurosceptic positions.<ref name=UKGovPol /> Cambridge historian David Abulafia states: "The concept of European identity arouses puzzlement."<ref name="Identity">{{cite news|title=The island story that flags up Britain's differences from Europe|url=https://www.ft.com/content/c8e7a6ea-234e-11e6-9d4d-c11776a5124d|agency=Financial Times|date=27 November 2016}}</ref> Among the many differences is the very different legal tradition European nations have from that of the UK. A product of English history, ] is uncommon among the other members of the EU.<ref name="Identity"/> | |||
The political party with representation in the European Parliament that seeks to remove the United Kingdom from the European Union is the ]. Unrepresented parties and ]s have included the ], ], ], which was launched by ] ] in June 2012.<ref name="DM">{{cite web | author = Richards, S. | url = http://richardsblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/09/is-it-time-for-ukip-to-make-way-for-a-new-eurosceptic-party.html | title = Is it time for UKIP to make way for a new Eurosceptic party? | publisher = ] | date = September 20, 2012 | accessdate = September 24, 2012 | quote = You can tell when it's UKIP Conference time, because Nikki Sinclaire, the former UKIP MEP, can always be relied upon to pull a stunt to try to steal the limelight from her old party. This time, she's set up her own party, the "We Demand A Referendum Party".}}</ref> | |||
== Campaigns for withdrawal == | |||
Senior figures in both the Labour Party and Conservative Party have held strongly contrasting views on European integration ever since it became a contentious issue back in the 1970s. Neither party currently advocates the formal withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU, although both have put forward proposals for the reform of European institutions. However, pro-European reformers, such as the Conservative former Foreign Secretary ], are resolutely opposed to any moves towards a ].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/rifkind-looks-to-partnership-of-nations-as-solution-for-europe-1.416096|title=Rifkind looks to partnership of nations as solution for Europe|publisher='']'' (newspaper)|date=24 Jan 1997|accessdate=22 May 2014}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
The two main anti-EU campaigns during the UK referendum on EU membership were ] and ], both of which received limited support from Nigel Farage, leader of the UK's largest Eurosceptic political party.<ref>. ''UKIP''. Retrieved on 2 January 2016.</ref> ] was a cross-party group working with the campaigns ], ] and ].<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117023751/http://www.voteleavetakecontrol.org/campaign |date=17 November 2015 }}. ''Vote Leave''. Retrieved on 2 January 2016.</ref> Its donors include former Conservative treasurer and banker ], Labour donor ] and spread betting tycoon ], who was a major donor to the Conservatives before becoming UKIP treasurer.<ref name="theguardian.com">. ''the Guardian''. Retrieved on 2 January 2016.</ref> It was also the preferred campaign of UKIP's then only ], ].<ref name="theguardian.com"/> | |||
The ] campaign launched as of 23 January 2016 in Kettering as a national, cross party with the aim of bringing together all leave groups, founded by Conservative MPs ] and ] and Labour MP ] following in-fighting between Vote Leave and Leave.EU.<ref>{{cite news|title=The UK's EU referendum: All you need to know|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-32810887|access-date=21 February 2016|work=]|date=20 February 2016}}</ref> | |||
The ], the UK's third-largest parliamentary party, are strongly pro-EU but advocate institutional reform to advance European federalism, with a greater role for national parliaments in scrutinising EU legislation though with less power (through the raising of Qualified Majority Voting blocking thresholds as in the Lisbon Treaty) to block or amend it. | |||
The Left Leave Campaign (or ]) brought together Eurosceptic voices on the British left, sponsored by the ] trade union, <ref>{{Cite web |title=Transport union to campaign for exit from |url=https://www.rmt.org.uk/news/transport-union-to-campaign-for-exit-from-pro-austerity-eu/ |access-date=2022-04-26 |website=RMT |language=en}}</ref> the ] and the ]. The Campaign launched to unite anti-austerity voices and those critical of the ]. <ref>{{Cite web |date=2016-06-21 |title=Why I am voting for Lexit |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/why-i-am-voting-for-lexit-eu-brexit-out-a7093151.html |access-date=2022-04-26 |website=The Independent |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The ] (SNP) has tended to be pro-EU since the 1980s. As the SNP's heartlands tend to be in fishing and farming areas of Scotland, they have been seen as a real threat to the pro-European SNP. However, this has not yet emerged.{{clarify|date=January 2013}} | |||
The ] campaign, a non-partisan organisation campaigning for EU withdrawal, lists its reasons for EU withdrawal as freedom to make trading deals with other nations, control over national borders, control over UK government spending, the restoration of the British legal system, deregulation of EU laws and control of the NHS among others.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.betteroffout.net/the-case/10-reasons-wed-be-better-off-out/|title=10 Reasons to Leave|work=Better Off Out|access-date=19 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151203190322/http://www.betteroffout.net/the-case/10-reasons-wed-be-better-off-out/|archive-date=3 December 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> Similarly, the ], the UK's largest non-party anti-EU campaign in the years prior to the 2016 EU referendum, highlighted the EU's economic decline, the broad reach of EU regulation, the UK's lack of influence over new EU laws and the EU's plans for further integration.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.democracymovement.org.uk/our-case.html|title=Our Case|work=The Democracy Movement|access-date=31 January 2018}}</ref> ] and the ] are similar non-partisan campaigns. | |||
The ] does not seek to remove the United Kingdom from the European Union, but supports a referendum on the country's membership and is also highly critical of the EU's structure. | |||
The perceived ], including legitimacy problems of the ] and the ] and the ] over national legislation are some of the major objections of British Eurosceptics. The EU is also argued to have a negative financial impact due to rising costs of membership,<ref name="CostsT">{{cite news| url = https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8417255/300-a-year-the-cost-to-each-taxpayer-of-funding-EU.html| title = £300 a year: the cost to each taxpayer of funding EU| publisher = The Daily Telegraph|author1=Winnett, R. |author2=Waterfield, B.| date=31 March 2011| access-date= 8 June 2011| location=London}}</ref> and an alleged negative impact of EU regulatory burdens on UK business.{{cn|date=April 2020}} | |||
==Media attitudes== | |||
Among Britain's main national newspapers, those that take a broadly Eurosceptic line are the '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'' and '']'',<ref>{{cite book | last = Anderson | first = Peter J.|editor=Robert Harmsen, Menno Spiering | title = Euroscepticism: Party Politics, National Identity and European Integration | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=q7y5W8svwh0C | accessdate = 2009-12-17 | series = European Studies | year = 2005 | publisher = Rodopi | isbn =978-90-420-1946-1 | page = 151 | chapter = A Flag of Convenience? Discourse and Motivations of the London-based Eurosceptic Press }}</ref> as well as their respective Sunday sister publications. These newspapers tend to oppose further European integration and have called for ratification of the ] to be subject to a referendum. In November 2010, the ''Daily Express'' became the first British newspaper to formally call for withdrawal from the EU.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/214358/Get-Britain-out-of-Europe-Massive-support-for-our-crusadeGet-Britain-out-of-Europe-Massive-support-for-our-crusadeGet-Britain-out-of-Europe-Massive-support-for-our-crusadeGet-Britain-out-of-Europe-Massive-support-for-our-crusadeGet-Britain-out-of-Europe-Massive-support-for-our-crusade |title=Get Britain out of Europe: Massive support for our crusade |publisher=Express.co.uk |date=2010-11-29 |accessdate=2011-12-11}}</ref> | |||
Opponents of the EU have accused its politicians and ] of corruption. A media scoop of this sort was 2005 ] MEP request of the European Commission to disclose the individual Commissioner holiday travel, after ], ] had spent a week on the yacht of the Greek shipping billionaire ].<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article223215.ece| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071001091311/http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article223215.ece| url-status=dead| archive-date=1 October 2007| work=The Independent| location=London| title=Barroso survives confidence debate over free holiday with Greek tycoon| first=Stephen| last=Castle| date=26 May 2005| access-date=2 May 2010}}</ref> The ] reports about the financial planning are among the topics which are often scandalised in the British press.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/11/14/do1402.xml| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071116093745/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/11/14/do1402.xml| url-status=dead| archive-date=16 November 2007| work=The Daily Telegraph| location=London| title=Why aren't we shocked by a corrupt EU?| first=Daniel| last=Hannan| date=14 November 2007| access-date=2 May 2010}}</ref> | |||
'']'' and '']'' are widely seen as belonging to the "]".<ref name="QP">{{cite book | author = Scheller, P. R. | title = How valid is the distinction between the popular and the quality press in Britain? | publisher = Cardiff University (School of European Studies) | year = 2000 | isbn = 978-3-640-86409-6 | doi = 10.3239/9783638341035}}</ref> On the other hand, the '']'', '']'', and the '']'' are widely considered ]. The ''Daily Express'' withdrew from the ]'s self-regulatory system in early 2011.<ref name="PCC">{{cite web | url = http://www.pcc.org.uk/news/index.html?article=Njg3NA== | title = PCC statement on Northern & Shell's withdrawal from press self-regulatory system | publisher = Press Complaints Commission | date = 11-01-2011 | accessdate = 07-06-2011}}</ref> | |||
==2016 EU membership referendum== | |||
The hard-left daily '']'' takes an international-Marxist Eurosceptic position.{{Citation needed|date=November 2012}} Under the editorship of ], '']'', the journal of the Labour Movement, tended to give space to Eurosceptic contributors, including controversially Marc Glendening of the ].{{Citation needed|date=November 2012}} This position was defended by other centre-left Eurosceptics who also spoke on platforms with the Democracy Movement.{{Citation needed|date=November 2012}} | |||
{{Main|2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum}} | |||
] | |||
{|class="wikitable" style="text-align:right; font-size:100%;" | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="4" bgcolor="#E9E9E9" align="center" | ]<br />'''2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum''' <br />National result | |||
|- bgcolor="#09a8ff" align="center" | |||
! align="left" colspan="2" width="250" | Choice | |||
! width="80" | Votes | |||
! width="50" | % | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#0069b5" | | |||
| align="left" | '''Leave the European Union''' | |||
| '''17,410,742''' || '''51.89%''' | |||
|- | |||
| width="1" bgcolor="#ffcc08" | | |||
| align="left" | Remain a member of the European Union | |||
| 16,141,241 || 48.11% | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="4" bgcolor="#E9E9E9" | | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" colspan="2" | Registered voters and turnout | |||
| 46,500,001 || 72.21% | |||
|- | |||
| align="center" colspan="4" | <small>Source: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170129082658/http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/find-information-by-subject/elections-and-referendums/upcoming-elections-and-referendums/eu-referendum/electorate-and-count-information |date=29 January 2017 }}</small> | |||
|} | |||
On 23 June 2016, the ] was held, giving support for Britain leaving the European Union by a margin of 51.9% to 48.1%, with slightly over 72% turnout. Subsequently, after ] was appointed prime minister, she named three Cabinet ministers with new roles, all Eurosceptics, to negotiate the UK out of the EU: David Davis was appointed Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Liam Fox was appointed Secretary of State for International Trade and Boris Johnson was appointed Foreign Secretary.<ref>{{cite news |last=Stewart |first=Heather |date=14 July 2016 |title=Theresa May's decisive reshuffle draws line under Cameron era |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/14/theresa-mays-decisive-reshuffle-draws-line-under-cameron-era |newspaper=The Guardian |location=London, UK |access-date=15 July 2016}}</ref> | |||
The European Union has accused the British Press of circulating inaccurate stories which it calls "]".<ref name="BBC">{{cite news | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6481969.stm | title = Guide to the best euromyths | publisher = BBC | date = 2007-03-23 | accessdate = 08-06-2011}}</ref> Although they usually have a grain of truth in them, they sometimes arise from misunderstandings or erroneously attribute the actions of a different European organisation, such as the ], to the EU.<ref name="BBC"/> | |||
===Opinion polling=== | |||
The ] campaign, run by ], is a non-partisan organisation campaigning for EU withdrawal and lists its reasons for EU withdrawal as freedom to make trading deals with other nations, control over national borders, control over UK government spending, the restoration of the British legal system, deregulation of EU laws and control of the NHS among others.<ref></ref> | |||
{{main|Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum|Opinion polling on the United Kingdom rejoining the European Union (2020–present)}} | |||
The assessment of attitudes to the European Union and European Parliamentary Election voting intentions is undertaken on a regular basis by a variety of opinion polling organisations, including ], ], ] and ]. For detailed polls between 2013 and 2015 see ], for polls conducted between 2016 and 2020 see ] and for polls conducted between 2020 and today see ]. | |||
==Opinion polling== | |||
The assessment of attitudes to the European Union and European Parliamentary Election voting intentions is undertaken on a regular basis by a variety of opinion polling organisations, including ], ], ] and ]. | |||
=== |
===Opinion poll results=== | ||
Polling on this issue has typically produced narrow majorities in favour of remaining within the EU, although some polls have found the reverse result. According to an ''Opinium/Observer'' poll taken {{As of|2015|2|20|alt=on 20 February 2015}}, 51% of the British ] said they would most likely vote the United Kingdom to leave the European Union if they were offered a ], whereas 49% would not (the figures exclude 14% who said they were unsure). These studies also showed that 41% of the electorate view the EU as a positive force overall, whereas 34% saw it as negative,<ref name=ObserverPoll1>{{cite news|last1=Boffey|first1=Daniel|title=Majority of electorate would vote for UK to leave EU in latest poll|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/21/majority-electorate-vote-uk-leave-eu-poll|work=The Guardian|access-date=30 March 2015|date=21 February 2015}}</ref> and a study {{as of|2019|11|15|alt=in November 2012}} showed that while 48% of EU citizens trusted the European Parliament, only 22% of the UK trusted the Parliament.<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe">{{cite web| url = http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb71/eb713_annexes.pdf| title = Standard Eurobarometer 71 Table of Results, Standard Eurobarometer 71: Public Opinion in the European Union (fieldwork June — July 2009)| access-date=1 November 2009|date=September 2009| publisher = ]}}</ref>{{rp|110–2|date=November 2012}}{{rp| QA 14.1|date=November 2012}} | |||
A ] poll in 2010 found that 47% of voters in the United Kingdom would vote to leave the European Union, while 33% would vote to stay in (with 14% undecided and 5% ]).<ref name="YouGov2010">{{cite web | url = http://cdn.yougov.com/today_uk_import/YG-Archives-Pol-YouGov-EURef-100910.pdf | date = 08-09-2010 | publisher = YouGov | accessdate = 2014-06-13 | title = YouGov Survey Results | format = PDF}}</ref> Support and opposition for withdrawal from the Union are not evenly distributed among the different ]s: opposition to EU membership is most prevalent among those 60 and older (57%) and decreases to 31% among those aged 18–24 (with 35% of 18-24 year olds stating that they would vote for Britain to remain in the EU). Those most likely to vote for continued EU membership were those aged 25–39, at 38%, though the same percentage of 25-39 year olds would vote to leave it.<ref name="YouGov2010"/> Finally, the results of the poll showed some regional variation: support for withdrawal from the EU is lowest in London and Scotland (at 40% and 44% respectively) but reaches 49% across the rest of mainland Britain.<ref name="YouGov2010"/> | |||
Support and opposition for withdrawal from the EU are not evenly distributed among the different age groups: opposition to EU membership is most prevalent among those 60 and older, with a poll from {{as of|3|22–23|15|alt=22–23 March 2015}} showing that 48% of this age group oppose EU membership. This decreases to 22% among those aged 18–24 (with 56% of 18- to 24-year-olds stating that they would vote for Britain to remain in the EU). Finally, the results of the poll showed some regional variation: support for withdrawal from the EU is lowest in Scotland and London (at 22% and 32% respectively) but reaches 42% in ] and ] (the only region polled with a plurality in favour of withdrawal).<ref name="YouGov2015">{{cite web| url = http://cdn.yougov.com/cumulus_uploads/document/fwlih2uar3/YG-Archive-Pol-Sun-results-230315.pdf | date= 22–23 March 2015| publisher = YouGov| access-date=7 April 2015| title = YouGov Survey Results}}</ref> | |||
Whereas overall the majority of EU citizens (56%) believed that membership of the EU had benefited their country (with a significant minority (31%) believing that their country had not benefited),<ref name="Eurobarometer 71"/>{{rp|95–6|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe" />{{rp|QA7a|date=November 2012}}, in Britain only 34% believed that Britain had benefited from membership, on balance.<ref name="Eurobarometer 71" />{{rp|95–6|date=November 2012}} Overall, about 48% of EU citizens tended to trust the European Parliament, and about 36% did not tend to trust it,<ref name="Eurobarometer 71"/>{{rp|110–2|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe"/>{{rp|QA 13.1|date=November 2012}} but in Britain trust was lowest, at 22%.<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe"/>{{rp| QA 14.1|date=November 2012}} | |||
The February 2015 study also showed that trust of the UK's relationship with the EU is split along ] lines. When asked which party they trusted the most to handle the UK's relationship with the EU, 35% trusted the Tories the most (]); 33% trusted ]; 15% trusted ]; 7% trusted ] and 6% trusted the ].<ref name=ObserverPoll1/> | |||
===General attitudes to the European Union=== | |||
<!-- TO BE REPLACED WITH A MORE RECENT EUROBAROMETER SURVEY WHEN POSSIBLE --> | |||
A survey in {{As of|2009|alt=2009}} showed that attitudes toward the European Union vary greatly between countries. Overall, the majority of EU citizens supported their country's membership: over 50% thought their country's membership was "a good thing", and only 15% thought it was "a bad thing".<ref name="Eurobarometer 71">{{cite web | url = http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb71/eb71_std_part1.pdf | title = Standard Eurobarometer 71 (fieldwork June–July 2009) | accessdate=2009-11-26|date=September 2009 | format = PDF | publisher = ]}}</ref>{{rp|91–3|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe">{{cite web | url = http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb71/eb713_annexes.pdf | title = Standard Eurobarometer 71 Table of Results, Standard Eurobarometer 71: Public Opinion in the European Union (fieldwork June - July 2009) | accessdate=2009-11-01|date=September 2009 | format = PDF | publisher = ] | pages = }}</ref>{{rp|QA6a|date=November 2012}}; but while support was very high in Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain and Ireland, with about 70%–80% thinking that membership was a good thing, scepticism was high in Latvia, the United Kingdom, and Hungary, with only 25%–32% viewing membership as a good thing. | |||
In Britain, those who view the UK's membership of the EU negatively and those who view it as neither positive nor negative each constitute 32% of the population. Those who view EU membership positively make up 28%.<ref name="Eurobarometer 71"/>{{rp|91–3|date=November 2012}} | |||
== Notable people associated with Euroscepticism == | |||
Within Europe overall, a positive to neutral opinion of the EU dominated, with about 46% of citizens having a positive opinion and only 16% having a negative opinion; about 36% had a neutral opinion.<ref name="Eurobarometer 71"/>{{rp|130–3|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Eurobarometer 71 annexe"/>{{rp| QA 10|date=November 2012}} In Britain, only 22% had a positive opinion, 33% had a negative opinion, and 38% had a neutral opinion. | |||
<gallery widths="120" heights="120" perrow="4" class="center"> | |||
File:Enoch Powell 6 Allan Warren.jpg|alt=Enoch Powell|]<ref>{{Cite web |date=2016-06-07 |title=How Enoch Powell helped to shape modern Tory Euroscepticism |url=https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/how-enoch-powell-helped-to-shape-modern-tory-euroscepticism/ |access-date=2023-05-19 |website=British Politics and Policy at LSE}}</ref> | |||
File:Tony Benn2.jpg|alt=Tony Benn|]<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jones |first=Alistair (Alistair N. ) |url=http://archive.org/details/britaineuropeanu0000jone |title=Britain and the European Union |date=2007 |publisher=Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press |others=Internet Archive |isbn=978-0-7486-3029-5}}</ref> | |||
File:Margaret Thatcher stock portrait (cropped).jpg|alt=Margaret Thatcher|]<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Alexandre-Collier |first=Agnès |date=2015-11-01 |title=Euroscepticism under Margaret Thatcher and David Cameron : From Theory to Practice |url=https://journals.openedition.org/osb/1778 |journal=Observatoire de la société britannique |language=en |issue=17 |pages=115–133 |doi=10.4000/osb.1778 |s2cid=55603749 |issn=1775-4135}}</ref> | |||
File:Nigel Lawson 006.jpg|alt=Nigel Lawson|]<ref>{{Cite news |title=Nigel Lawson was the economic brain of Thatcherism |newspaper=The Economist |url=https://www.economist.com/britain/2023/04/04/nigel-lawson-was-the-economic-brain-of-thatcherism |access-date=2023-05-19 |issn=0013-0613}}</ref> | |||
File:Michael Portillo December 2017.jpg|alt=Michael Portillo|]<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Helm |first1=Toby |last2=editor |first2=Toby Helm Observer political |date=2016-02-07 |title=British Euroscepticism: a brief history |language=en-GB |work=The Observer |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/feb/07/british-euroscepticism-a-brief-history |access-date=2023-05-19 |issn=0029-7712}}</ref> | |||
File:Official portrait of Sir William Cash crop 2.jpg|alt=Bill Cash|]<ref>{{Cite news |date=2020-01-29 |title=Mavericks to mainstream: The long campaign for Brexit |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-51021028 |access-date=2023-05-19}}</ref> | |||
File:Daniel Hannan by Gage Skidmore.jpg|alt=Daniel Hannan|]<ref>{{Cite news |last=Knight |first=Sam |date=2016-09-29 |title=The man who brought you Brexit |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/29/daniel-hannan-the-man-who-brought-you-brexit |access-date=2023-05-19 |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> | |||
File:Nigel Farage (45718080574) (cropped).jpg|alt=Nigel Farage|]<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mason |first=Rowena |date=2015-06-17 |title=Nigel Farage says he is prepared to lead no campaign in EU referendum |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/17/nigel-farage-prepared-lead-no-campaign-eu-referendum |access-date=2023-05-19 |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> | |||
File:Official portrait of Rt Hon Michael Gove MP crop 2.jpg|alt=Michael Gove|]<ref>{{Cite news |last=Boffey |first=Daniel |date=2016-02-20 |title=Michael Gove: the big beast who gives Eurosceptics the leadership they need |language=en-GB |work=The Observer |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/feb/20/michael-gove-eurosceptics-eu-leave-campaign |access-date=2023-05-19 |issn=0029-7712}}</ref> | |||
File:Boris Johnson official portrait (cropped).jpg|alt=Boris Johnson|]<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Landler |first1=Mark |last2=Castle |first2=Stephen |date=2020-12-10 |title=Boris Johnson Once Mocked the Eurocrats of Brussels. They Haven't Forgotten. |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/10/world/europe/boris-johnson-brussels-trade-brexit.html |access-date=2023-05-19 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> | |||
File:Official portrait of Rt Hon Priti Patel MP crop 2.jpg|alt=Priti Patel|]<ref>{{Cite news |date=2017-11-08 |title=Profile: Priti Patel |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-41913203 |access-date=2023-05-19}}</ref> | |||
File:Rishi Sunak 2023.jpg|alt=Rishi Sunak|]<ref>{{Cite news |last=Pickard |first=Jim |date=2020-02-13 |title=Rishi Sunak, the fast-rising Brexiter rewarded by Boris Johnson |work=Financial Times |url=https://www.ft.com/content/b82ebeae-4e62-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5 |access-date=2023-05-19}}</ref> | |||
</gallery> | |||
== Eurosceptic parties == | |||
* ] (BDP)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://search.electoralcommission.org.uk//English/Registrations/PP1765|title=View registration – The Electoral Commission|website=search.electoralcommission.org.uk}}</ref> | |||
* ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.britainfirst.org/minister-blasts-relentless-campaign-of-fear-over-brexit/ |title=MINISTER BLASTS "RELENTLESS CAMPAIGN OF FEAR' OVER BREXIT" |website=Britainfirst.org |access-date=3 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306034101/http://www.britainfirst.org/minister-blasts-relentless-campaign-of-fear-over-brexit/ |archive-date=6 March 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.britainfirst.org/eu-plots-military-merger-if-uk-votes-to-stay-in/ |title=EU PLOTS MILITARY MERGER IF UK VOTES TO STAY IN |website=Britainfirst.org |access-date=3 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306033448/http://www.britainfirst.org/eu-plots-military-merger-if-uk-votes-to-stay-in/ |archive-date=6 March 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
* ] (BNP)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://bnp.org.uk/policies/foreign-affairs/|title=FOREIGN AFFAIRS}}</ref> | |||
* ] (CPB-ML) | |||
* ] (CPB) | |||
* ] (factions)<ref>{{Cite web |last=Diamond |first=Professor Patrick |date=2016-10-04 |title=The Conservative Party and Brexit |url=https://ukandeu.ac.uk/the-conservative-party-and-brexit/ |access-date=2023-05-19 |website=UK in a changing Europe |language=en-GB}}</ref> | |||
*] | |||
* ]<ref name="leaflet"/> (not to be confused with the ]) | |||
* ]<ref name="leaflet">{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/12/conservative-donors-prepare-to-sink-5million-into-brexit-campaig/|title=Conservative donors prepare to sink £5million into Brexit campaign amid anger about pro-EU leaflet|author=Christopher Hope and Peter Dominiczak|date=12 April 2016|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph|access-date=6 May 2016}}</ref> | |||
* ] (formerly Brexit Party) | |||
* ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.socialdemocraticparty.co.uk/|title=Home|access-date=23 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150509052819/http://www.socialdemocraticparty.co.uk/sdp-principles.php|archive-date=9 May 2015|url-status=dead}}{{better source|date=June 2016}}</ref> | |||
* ] (SLP)<ref>Socialist Labour Party: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160803203633/http://www.socialist-labour-party.org.uk/electioncampaign.html |date=3 August 2016 }}</ref> | |||
* ] (TUSC)<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.tusc.org.uk/17182/22-02-2016/tusc-letter-in-the-guardian-now-sign-the-petition |title=Tusc Letter In The Guardian Now Sign The Petition |website=Tusc.org.uk |date=22 February 2016 |access-date=2 March 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304173007/https://www.tusc.org.uk/17182/22-02-2016/tusc-letter-in-the-guardian-now-sign-the-petition |archive-date=4 March 2016 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://search.electoralcommission.org.uk//English/Registrations/PerPar3955|title=View registration – The Electoral Commission|website=search.electoralcommission.org.uk}}</ref> | |||
* ] (UKIP) | |||
* ] (WPB) | |||
===Defunct Eurosceptic parties=== | |||
* ] (1967–1988) | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (1994–1997) | |||
* ] (2012–2014) | |||
* ] (2005–2015) | |||
* ] (2013–2015) | |||
* ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.respectparty.org/2016/02/22/respect-to-campaign-to-leave-the-european-union/|title=Respect to campaign to leave the EU|work=The Respect Party|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303080320/http://www.respectparty.org/2016/02/22/respect-to-campaign-to-leave-the-european-union/|archive-date=3 March 2016|df=dmy-all}}</ref> (2004–2016) | |||
* ]<ref>{{cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JO2ij6EorAc|title=AN INDEPENDENCE FROM EUROPE YOUTUBE|date=19 April 2014|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}}{{Dead Youtube links|date=February 2022}}</ref> (2012–2017) | |||
* ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://libertygb.org.uk/news/eu-debate-lost-no-matter-who-wins |title=The EU Debate Is Lost No Matter Who Wins |publisher=Liberty GB |date=21 February 2016 |access-date=3 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306145330/http://libertygb.org.uk/news/eu-debate-lost-no-matter-who-wins |archive-date=6 March 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref> (2013–2017) | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] (straight bananas) | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (straight banana) | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|30em}} | {{reflist|30em}} | ||
==Further reading== | |||
* Abbott, Lewis F. ''British Withdrawal from the European Union: A Guide to the Case For''. ISR/Google Books, 2013. | |||
* ], and ], '']'', ] London and New York, 2003. (EU Referendum Edition published by Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, April 2016) | |||
* Gilbert, Mark (23 January 2020), "The Intellectual Origins of Brexit: Enoch Powell, Douglas Jay and the British Dissenting Tradition", ''Euroscepticisms'', Brill, pp. 121–139, doi:10.1163/9789004421257_008, ISBN <bdi>978-90-04-42125-7</bdi>, | |||
*Grob-Fitzgibbon, Benjamin. ''Continental Drift: Britain and Europe from the End of Empire to the Rise of Euroscepticism'' (2016) | |||
* Sutcliffe, John B. "The roots and consequences of Euroskepticism: an evaluation of the United Kingdom Independence Party." ''Geopolitics, History, and International Relations'' 4.1 (2012): 107–127. | |||
* Spiering, Menno. "British euroscepticism." in Robert Harmsen and Menno Spiering, eds. ''Euroscepticism''. (Brill Rodopi, 2004) pp. 127–149. | |||
* {{cite book|author=Tiersky, Ronald ed.|title=Euro-skepticism: A Reader|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GRFVoSlYhEwC&pg=PA103|year=2001|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|pages=103–111|isbn=9780742510548}}, primary sources | |||
==External links== | |||
*Adrian Williamson, , History and Policy (2015) | |||
{{United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Euroscepticism In The United Kingdom}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Euroscepticism In The United Kingdom}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 03:54, 1 December 2024
Criticism/opposition to the European Union in the United KingdomThis article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (January 2025) |
Part of a series of articles on | ||||||||||
UK membership of the European Union (1973–2020) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accession | ||||||||||
1975 referendum | ||||||||||
Treaty amendments
Related: |
||||||||||
MEPs for UK constituencies |
||||||||||
Officials and bodies | ||||||||||
Issues and events | ||||||||||
Withdrawal | ||||||||||
Euroscepticism in the United Kingdom is a continuum of belief ranging from the opposition to certain political policies of the European Union to the complete opposition to the United Kingdom’s membership of the European Union. It has been a significant element in the politics of the United Kingdom (UK). A 2009 Eurobarometer survey of EU citizens showed support for membership of the EU was lowest in the United Kingdom, alongside Latvia and Hungary.
Levels of support for the EU have historically been lower in the UK than most other member states. UK citizens are the least likely to feel a sense of European identity, and national sovereignty is also seen as more important to British people than that of people from other EU nations. Additionally, the United Kingdom was the least integrated EU member state with four 'opt-outs' – the most of any EU member state.
A referendum on the UK's membership of the European Community was held in 1975, with a majority voting in favour of continued membership of the EC (which later evolved into the European Union). A referendum on membership of the EU was held in 2016, with a majority of voters voting to leave the European Union.
The decision of the electorate to vote in favour of Brexit marks the first time in history that a member state has decided to leave the European Union. The UK formally left the EU on 31 January 2020.
History
In the United States, an ideological divide between reverence for continental European refinery and classics and xenophobic sentiment has existed for centuries; however, Euroscepticism is different from the anti-Europeanism more prevalent in American culture. In the late 19th century, Britain's foreign policy stance of minimal involvement in European affairs was characterised as "splendid isolation".
The European Unity movement as a political project after 1945 was supported and inspired by British figures such as Winston Churchill who pledged in his 1946 Zurich speech for "a kind of United States of Europe" led by France and Germany but who did not see a need to involve Britain. The ambivalent position of Britain has been described as "wishing to seem to be a major part of Europe without wanting actually to take part". The othering of European unity as a Continental issue and somebody else's problem has been a recurrent theme. Pro-European British politicians and citizens have faced various defeats and humiliations with regard to Britain's steps in the direction of increased European integration. Even parties like the Liberal Democrats with a clearly pro-European platform, have members that share the British lack of enthusiasms "of all things European". After joining the EU, confrontational attitudes of British politicians, as in the UK rebate controversy, gained further popularity among the British public, and many Britons feel a much stronger affection for the Commonwealth of Nations than they ever have for the EU.
After 1945
Britain was urged to join and lead Western Europe in the immediate aftermath of World War II. The American Committee for a United Europe and the European Conference on Federation led by Winston Churchill were among the early endeveaours for European unity with British participation. Churchill also participated in the Hague Congress of 1948, which discussed the future structure and role of a proposed Council of Europe. British governments and political mainstream players, while advocating stronger integration of the Continent, did not intend to take part themselves. Britain never had a strong pro-European movement like the one founded in post-war Germany. During the postwar years up to 1954, the UK was occupied with the decolonisation of its global empire. It was not among the six founding member states of the European Communities in the early-1950s (described as the "Inner Six"). The six member states signed the Treaty of Paris, creating the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), on 18 April 1951; but failed to create a European Defence Community.
Whilst after the war Churchill was an early supporter of pan-Europeanism and called for a "United States of Europe" and the creation of a "Council of Europe", he did not have Britain join the ECSC in 1951.
We have our own dream and our own task. We are with Europe, but not of it. We are linked but not combined. We are interested and associated but not absorbed.
In the years before, only the British extreme right – in particular, fascist politician Oswald Mosley – were rather outspoken, based on the Union Movement and the Europe a Nation slogan, for a stronger integration of Britain with Europe. The British elites did not assume Britain should or could take part as a simple member in the European communities at that time. The reservation was based less on economic considerations, since European integration would have offset the decreasing importance of trade within the Commonwealth of Nations trade, but rather on political philosophy. In Britain, the concept of unlimited sovereignty, based on the British legal system and parliamentary tradition was, and is, held in high esteem and presents a serious impediment to attempts at integration into a Continental legal framework.
The Labour Party leader Hugh Gaitskell once declared that joining the European Economic Community (EEC) would mean "the end of a thousand years of history". Some Gaitskellites (including the later founders of the Social Democratic Party), were favourable to British involvement. Labour later moved from its opposition towards the European Community and began to support membership. Important groups of Conservatives also opposed joining the Common Market. One of the earliest groups formed against British involvement in Europe was the Conservative Party-based Anti-Common Market League, whose president Victor Montagu declared that opponents of the Common Market did not want to "subject to a lot of frogs and huns". Conversely, much of the opposition to Britain's EU membership came from Labour politicians and trade unionists who feared bloc membership would impede socialist policies, although this was never the universal Labour Party opinion. In 2002, a minority of Labour MPs, and others such as Denis Healey, formed the Labour Against the Euro group in 2002, opposing British membership of the single currency. The Trades Union Congress remains strongly pro-EU.
Impact of the Suez Crisis 1956
Even before the events of the Suez Crisis in 1956, the United Kingdom had faced strains in its relationship with the U.S. After the Suez conflict it had finally to accept that it could no longer assume that it was the preferred partner of the United States and underwent a massive loss of trust in the special relationship with the U.S. Britain, Denmark, Ireland, and Norway then started to prepare for a trading union, the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). British politicians, such as Labour's George Brown were in 1962 still of opinion, that Britain should not only be allowed to join, but be welcomed to lead the European Union, and met then with ridicule.
In the 1960s, the membership attempts of Conservative UK governments faced strong resistance from the Continent, especially from the French president, Charles de Gaulle. Instead of being offered a leadership role, Britain was put on a yearlong waiting list, a major political humiliation for pro-European Britons. De Gaulle's veto in 1963 was a devastating blow for Harold Macmillan, who, according to Hugo Young, was not the last Tory politician to end his or her career as a result of European affairs. The UK faced a major economic decline and a row of disturbing political scandals as well. The combination did not help much with Europe's image in the UK, and vice versa. With Georges Pompidou replacing de Gaulle, the veto was lifted and negotiations began in 1970 under the pro-European Conservative government of Edward Heath. The question of sovereignty had been discussed at the time in an official document (FCO 30/1048) that became open to the public many years later in January 2002, under the rules for availability after thirty years. It listed among "Areas of policy in which parliamentary freedom to legislate will be affected by entry into the European Communities": Customs duties, Agriculture, Free movement of labour, services and capital, Transport, and Social Security for migrant workers. The document concluded (paragraph 26) that it was advisable to put the considerations of influence and power before those of formal sovereignty. Among disagreements that Heath had to deal were those relating to the Common Agricultural Policy and the remaining relationship with the Commonwealth of Nations. In 1972 the accession treaties were signed with all but Norway.
Admission and 1975 EC membership referendum
Main article: 1975 United Kingdom European Communities membership referendum1975 United Kingdom European Communities membership referendum National result | |||
Choice | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | 17,378,581 | 67.23% | |
No | 8,470,073 | 32.70% | |
Registered voters and turnout | 40,086,677 | 64.67% |
Despite the decision to join the European Community, internal Labour divisions over EEC membership prompted the Labour Party to propose a referendum be held on the permanence of the UK in the Communities. Proposed in 1972 by Tony Benn, Labour's referendum proposal led the anti-EEC Conservative politician Enoch Powell to advocate a Labour vote (initially only inferred) in the February 1974 election, which was thought to have influenced the result, a return to government of the Labour Party. The eventual referendum in 1975 asked the voters:
Do you think the United Kingdom should stay in the European Community (the Common Market)?
British membership of the EEC was endorsed by 67% of those voting, with a turnout of 64.5% and was a major defeat for the anti-marketers at the time with only two of the 68 counting areas returning "No" majority votes.
From 1975 to 1997
The debate between Eurosceptics (known as anti-marketeers until the late 1980s) and EU supporters (known as pro-marketeers until the late 1980s) is ongoing within, rather than between, British political parties, whose membership is of varied standpoints. The two main political parties in Britain, the Conservative Party and the Labour Party, each have within them a broad spectrum of views concerning the European Union.
In the 1970s and early 1980s, the Labour Party was the more Eurosceptic of the two parties, with more anti-European Communities MPs than the Conservatives. In 1975, Labour held a special conference on British membership and the party voted 2 to 1 for Britain to leave the European Communities, with more MPs supporting withdrawal than opposing it and only seven out of 46 affiliated trade unions supporting staying in the Common Market. The views of many leaders and activists within the party were reflected by Tony Benn, who claimed during the 1975 EEC referendum that unless Britain voted to leave, "half a million jobs lost in Britain and a huge increase in food prices (would be) a direct result of our entry into the Common Market". In 1979, the Labour manifesto declared that a Labour government would "oppose any move towards turning the Community into a federation" and, in 1983, it still favoured British withdrawal from the EEC.
Under the leadership of Neil Kinnock after 1983, the then opposition party dropped its former resistance to the European Communities and instead favoured greater British integration into European Economic and Monetary Union. Former British prime minister from 1979 to 1990, Margaret Thatcher gained much popularity with the UK rebate in 1984. Britain then managed to reduce its contributions to the Union to a certain extent, as it was then the EU's second poorest member and, without much agriculture, benefited little from farm subsidies.
A speech by Jacques Delors, President of the European Commission, at the TUC conference in 1988 helped to weaken the eurosceptic inclination in the Labour Party. In the speech, he argued for financial transfers to deindustrialising regions and for all workers to be covered by collective agreements. In response, the formerly eurosceptic union leader Ron Todd declared that "in the short term we have not a cat in hell’s chance in Westminster. The only card game in town at the moment is in a town called Brussels". As President of the Commission, Delors pushed for stronger pan-European regulations in areas including industrial relations, health and safety, the environment and consumer protection. In addition he played a key role in the incorporation of the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers into the Treaty of Maastricht, enshrining a series of workers' rights into European law. In the context of Thatcher's Conservative premiership, when policies to reduce the power of the trade unions were pursued, Delors' advocacy of a "social Europe" became attractive to many. In 1989, the Labour Party officially dropped support for a withdrawal from the EEC: by 1998, only three per cent of the party's MPs supported leaving the EU.
The UK rebate was also held up by Thatcher's successors as prime minister. Thatcher had worked with Delors in building a single market and supported the Single European Act of 1986, but by 1988 believed that the single market would cause greater political integration which she opposed. That year she warned in the Bruges speech of "a European super-state exercising a new dominance from Brussels". In late October 1990, just before her premiership ended, Thatcher reacted strongly against Delors' plans for a single currency in the House of Commons. Her stance contributed to her downfall a few weeks later, but Thatcher influenced others such as Daniel Hannan, whose Oxford Campaign for an Independent Britain (1990) may be the start of the Brexit campaign.
Role of the Post-Maastricht Blues
The overall acceptance of the European Union in all member states saw a strong increase of support till the 1990s and a major decline afterwards, support sinking to 1980s levels then. Due to the timely connection with the Maastricht Treaty 1992, it has been called the post-Maastricht-Blues. The European integration process faced a major defeat with the failed Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and eurosceptical opinions gained more impact overall. The role of public opinion had been lower before but gained importance with state referendums, as in the rejection of the constitution by French and Dutch voters in 2005.
Since 1997
The financier Sir James Goldsmith formed the Referendum Party as a single-issue party to fight the 1997 General Election, calling for a referendum on aspects of the UK's relationship with the European Union. It planned to contest every constituency where there was no leading candidate in favour of such a referendum, and briefly held a seat in the House of Commons after George Gardiner, the Conservative MP for Reigate, changed parties in March 1997 following a battle against deselection by his local party. The party polled 800,000 votes and finished fourth, but did not win a seat in the House of Commons. The United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), advocating the UK's complete withdrawal from the European Union, had been founded in 1993 by Alan Sked, but initially had only very limited success. Due to a change in the election principle, the 1999 European Parliament election allowed for the first UKIP parliamentary representation. Over-interest in the issue may have been an important reason why the Conservative Party lost the General Election of 2001; they argued that the British electorate was more influenced by domestic issues than by European affairs.
After the electoral defeat of the UK Conservatives in 2001, the issue of Eurosceptism was important in the contest to elect a new party leader. The winner, Iain Duncan Smith, was seen as more Eurosceptic than his predecessor, William Hague. As opposition leader, Iain Duncan Smith attempted to disaffiliate the British Conservative Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) from the federalist European People's Party group. As MEPs must participate in a transnational alliance to retain parliamentary privileges, Duncan Smith sought the merger of Conservative MEPs into the Eurosceptic Union for a Europe of Nations (UEN) group. Conservative MEPs vetoed this move because of the presence within the UEN of representatives of neo-fascist parties who do not share similar domestic politics. In 2004, Duncan Smith's successor, Michael Howard, emphasised that Conservative MEPs would remain in the EPP Group so as to maintain influence in the European Parliament. Michael Howard's successor David Cameron pledged to remove Conservative MEPs from the EPP Group and this was implemented.
UKIP received 16% of the vote and gained 12 MEPs in the 2004 European Election. The party's results improved in the 2009 UK European Election, coming in second, above the incumbent Labour Party. In the 2014 UK European Parliament elections, UKIP support reached a new high water mark in England, coming first ahead of the Labour party, and gaining 26.6% of the vote, but on a very low unmotivated voter turnout of just 35.4 per cent.
"Awkward partner" status
Professor Stephen George states in his 1990 book An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community that the UK is an "awkward partner" within the European Union, emphasising that although the UK is not the only EU member state to oppose further EU integration, it is less enthusiastic than most other members. Factors contributing to "awkward partner" status include the distinctiveness of the identity and culture of the UK in contrast to that of continental Europe. According to a 2003 profile in The Guardian, historian Robert Conquest favoured a British withdrawal from the EU in favour of creating "a much looser association of English-speaking nations, known as the Anglosphere. Examples of closer ties include the "special relationship" with the US. Additionally, the UK has not experienced the major political upheavals of continental Europe.
British government officials have often been hostile towards further European integration, supporting intergovernmental cooperation as opposed to supranational authority, and a single market rather than the EMU. Great importance has also been attached to the defence of national sovereignty, i.e. where ultimate decision-making authority is located in the United Kingdom as a nation state.
The UK has also experienced limited influence in EU negotiations; on key EU policies (e.g. the EMU), British governments have not set the agenda but reacted to proposals from others by attempting to slow the pace of integration, or limit its impact. Although influential in some areas – e.g. the single market and defence – the UK is often in a minority of states opposed to change, and has not developed durable alliances to counter the Franco-German partnership.
The UK does not have the consensus among the elite of the country on the benefits of EU membership, as opposed to other EU member states. As Andrew Williamson notes, the issue has caused divisions within Labour in the past and the Conservatives today, and is most prominent in the Conservatives and the UK Independence Party (UKIP).
Levels of support are lower in the UK than most other member states, as well as having less knowledge about the institution. UK citizens are the least likely to feel a sense of European identity, and national sovereignty is also seen as more important to British people than that of people from other EU nations, with many major newspapers taking Eurosceptic positions. Cambridge historian David Abulafia states: "The concept of European identity arouses puzzlement." Among the many differences is the very different legal tradition European nations have from that of the UK. A product of English history, common law is uncommon among the other members of the EU.
Campaigns for withdrawal
The two main anti-EU campaigns during the UK referendum on EU membership were Vote Leave and Leave.EU, both of which received limited support from Nigel Farage, leader of the UK's largest Eurosceptic political party. Vote Leave was a cross-party group working with the campaigns Labour Leave, Conservatives for Britain and Business for Britain. Its donors include former Conservative treasurer and banker Peter Cruddas, Labour donor John Mills and spread betting tycoon Stuart Wheeler, who was a major donor to the Conservatives before becoming UKIP treasurer. It was also the preferred campaign of UKIP's then only Member of Parliament, Douglas Carswell.
The Grassroots Out campaign launched as of 23 January 2016 in Kettering as a national, cross party with the aim of bringing together all leave groups, founded by Conservative MPs Peter Bone and Tom Pursglove and Labour MP Kate Hoey following in-fighting between Vote Leave and Leave.EU.
The Left Leave Campaign (or Lexit) brought together Eurosceptic voices on the British left, sponsored by the Rail, Maritime and Transport trade union, the Socialist Workers Party and the Communist Party of Britain. The Campaign launched to unite anti-austerity voices and those critical of the European Union's response to the 2015 European Migrant Crisis.
The Better Off Out campaign, a non-partisan organisation campaigning for EU withdrawal, lists its reasons for EU withdrawal as freedom to make trading deals with other nations, control over national borders, control over UK government spending, the restoration of the British legal system, deregulation of EU laws and control of the NHS among others. Similarly, the Democracy Movement, the UK's largest non-party anti-EU campaign in the years prior to the 2016 EU referendum, highlighted the EU's economic decline, the broad reach of EU regulation, the UK's lack of influence over new EU laws and the EU's plans for further integration. Get Britain Out and the Campaign for an Independent Britain are similar non-partisan campaigns.
The perceived democratic deficit in the European Union, including legitimacy problems of the European Commission and the European Parliament and the supremacy of EU law over national legislation are some of the major objections of British Eurosceptics. The EU is also argued to have a negative financial impact due to rising costs of membership, and an alleged negative impact of EU regulatory burdens on UK business.
Opponents of the EU have accused its politicians and civil servants of corruption. A media scoop of this sort was 2005 Nigel Farage MEP request of the European Commission to disclose the individual Commissioner holiday travel, after President of the European Commission, José Barroso had spent a week on the yacht of the Greek shipping billionaire Spiro Latsis. The European Court of Auditors reports about the financial planning are among the topics which are often scandalised in the British press.
2016 EU membership referendum
Main article: 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum National result | |||
Choice | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Leave the European Union | 17,410,742 | 51.89% | |
Remain a member of the European Union | 16,141,241 | 48.11% | |
Registered voters and turnout | 46,500,001 | 72.21% | |
Source: Electoral Commission Archived 29 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine |
On 23 June 2016, the United Kingdom EU membership referendum was held, giving support for Britain leaving the European Union by a margin of 51.9% to 48.1%, with slightly over 72% turnout. Subsequently, after Theresa May was appointed prime minister, she named three Cabinet ministers with new roles, all Eurosceptics, to negotiate the UK out of the EU: David Davis was appointed Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Liam Fox was appointed Secretary of State for International Trade and Boris Johnson was appointed Foreign Secretary.
Opinion polling
Main articles: Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum and Opinion polling on the United Kingdom rejoining the European Union (2020–present)The assessment of attitudes to the European Union and European Parliamentary Election voting intentions is undertaken on a regular basis by a variety of opinion polling organisations, including ComRes, ICM, Populus and Survation. For detailed polls between 2013 and 2015 see here, for polls conducted between 2016 and 2020 see here and for polls conducted between 2020 and today see here.
Opinion poll results
Polling on this issue has typically produced narrow majorities in favour of remaining within the EU, although some polls have found the reverse result. According to an Opinium/Observer poll taken on 20 February 2015, 51% of the British electorate said they would most likely vote the United Kingdom to leave the European Union if they were offered a referendum, whereas 49% would not (the figures exclude 14% who said they were unsure). These studies also showed that 41% of the electorate view the EU as a positive force overall, whereas 34% saw it as negative, and a study in November 2012 showed that while 48% of EU citizens trusted the European Parliament, only 22% of the UK trusted the Parliament.
Support and opposition for withdrawal from the EU are not evenly distributed among the different age groups: opposition to EU membership is most prevalent among those 60 and older, with a poll from 22–23 March 2015 showing that 48% of this age group oppose EU membership. This decreases to 22% among those aged 18–24 (with 56% of 18- to 24-year-olds stating that they would vote for Britain to remain in the EU). Finally, the results of the poll showed some regional variation: support for withdrawal from the EU is lowest in Scotland and London (at 22% and 32% respectively) but reaches 42% in the Midlands and Wales (the only region polled with a plurality in favour of withdrawal).
The February 2015 study also showed that trust of the UK's relationship with the EU is split along partisan lines. When asked which party they trusted the most to handle the UK's relationship with the EU, 35% trusted the Tories the most (Conservatives); 33% trusted Labour; 15% trusted UKIP; 7% trusted the Greens and 6% trusted the Liberal Democrats.
Notable people associated with Euroscepticism
- Enoch Powell
- Tony Benn
- Margaret Thatcher
- Nigel Lawson
- Michael Portillo
- Bill Cash
- Daniel Hannan
- Nigel Farage
- Michael Gove
- Boris Johnson
- Priti Patel
- Rishi Sunak
Eurosceptic parties
- British Democratic Party (BDP)
- Britain First
- British National Party (BNP)
- Communist Party of Britain (Marxist–Leninist) (CPB-ML)
- Communist Party of Britain (CPB)
- Conservative Party (factions)
- English Democrats
- Liberal Party (not to be confused with the Liberal Democrats)
- New Communist Party of Britain
- Reform UK (formerly Brexit Party)
- Social Democratic Party (SDP)
- Socialist Labour Party (SLP)
- Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC)
- UK Independence Party (UKIP)
- Workers Party of Britain (WPB)
Defunct Eurosceptic parties
- Anti Common Market and Free Trade Party (1967–1988)
- Anti-Federalist League
- Referendum Party (1994–1997)
- We Demand a Referendum (2012–2014)
- Veritas (2005–2015)
- New Deal (2013–2015)
- Respect Party (2004–2016)
- Independence from Europe (2012–2017)
- Liberty GB (2013–2017)
See also
- 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum
- Brexit
- British nationalism
- Bruges Group
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 2257/94 (straight banana)
- Euroscepticism in Ireland
- Factortame litigation
- Metric Martyrs
- Opinion polling on the United Kingdom's membership of the European Union (2016–2020)
- Opinion polling on the United Kingdom rejoining the European Union (2020–present)
- United Kingdom–European Union relations
References
- "Standard Eurobarometer 71 (fieldwork June–July 2009)" (PDF). European Commission. September 2009. Retrieved 26 November 2009.
- Anti-Europeanism and Euroscepticism in the United States, Patrick Chamorel No 25, EUI-RSCAS Working Papers from European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS) 2004
- Margaret Macmillan, The War That Ended Peace: The Road to 1914 (2013) ch 2
- "Winston Churchill speaking in Zurich, I9 September 1946". Archived from the original on 22 April 2012. Retrieved 5 October 2014.
- ^ Watts, Duncan; Pilkington, Colin (2005). Britain in the European Union Today (3rd ed.). Manchester University Press. ISBN 9780719071799.
- ^ Gehler, Michael (2009). From Common Market to European Union Building. Vienna: Böhlau. p. 240. ISBN 9783205777441.
- ^ This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair, Hugo Young, Overlook Press, 1998
- Britain in the European Union Today: Third Edition, Duncan Watts, Colin Pilkington, Manchester University Press, 29 November 2005, p.220
- ^ Jenkins, p. 810 and p. 819-14
- "Remembrance Day 2003". Churchill Society London. Retrieved 25 April 2007.
- Culture of Fascism: Visions of the Far Right in Britain, Julie V. Gottlieb, Thomas P. Linehan.B.Tauris, 31 December 2003, p.75
- DRÁBIK, Jakub. Oswald Mosley´s Concept of a United Europe. A Contribution to the Study of Pan-European Nationalism. In. The Twentieth Century, 2/2012, s. 53–65, Prague : Charles University in Prague, ISSN 1803-750X
- ^ Drawn into the Heart of Europe?: Die britische Europapolitik im Spiegel von Karikaturen (1973–2008), Julia Quante, LIT Verlag Münster, 2013
- ^ From common market to European Union building, Michael Gehler, Böhlau Verlag Wien, 2009
- "Your favourite Conference Clips". BBC. 3 October 2007. Retrieved 17 September 2011.
- Lieber, R. J. (1970). British politics and European unity: parties, elites, and pressure groups. University of California Press. p. 210. ISBN 978-0-520-01675-0.
- "Labour MPs launch anti-euro drive", BBC News, 10 April 2002
- Patrick Wintour "TUC accuses Tory Eurosceptics of trying to undermine labour law", The Guardian, 16 January 2013
- Pax Anglo-Americana, Ursula Lehmkuhl, Oldenbourg 1999, p.236
- FCO 30/1048, Legal and constitutional implications of UK entry into EEC (open from 1 January 2002).
- See 1972 Norwegian European Communities membership referendum
- Peter Oborne "David Cameron may have finished off the Tories – but he had no choice", Daily Telegraph, 23 January 2013
- Simon Heffer Like the Roman: The Life of Enoch Powell, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998, p.707-10
- "1975: Labour votes to leave the EEC". BBC News. 26 April 1975. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
- ^ Georgiou, Christakis (April 2017). "British Capitalism and European Unification, from Ottawa to the Brexit Referendum". Historical Materialism. 25 (1): 90–129. doi:10.1163/1569206X-12341511. Retrieved 14 September 2019.
- "Political Science Resources: politics and government around the world". Psr.keele.ac.uk. 5 May 2011. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
- "Political Science Resources: politics and government around the world". Psr.keele.ac.uk. 5 May 2011. Archived from the original on 25 May 1998. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
- ^ "Reuters footage". ITN Source archive. Reuters. 16 December 2005. Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 26 January 2013.
Blair is under pressure to yield on the rebate won by his predecessor Margaret Thatcher in 1984 to reflect the fact that Britain, then the EU's second poorest member, benefited little from farm subsidies.
- Peter Oborne "It's taken decades, but Labour has seen the light on Europe", telegraph.co.uk, 21 April 2011
- Katwala, Sunder (12 September 2007). "Bring Back Social Europe". guardian.co.uk. London. Retrieved 4 September 2008.
- ^ Kuper, Simon (20 June 2019). "How Oxford university shaped Brexit — and Britain's next prime minister". Financial Times. Retrieved 21 June 2019.
- "30 October 1990: 'No! No! No!'", BBC Democracy Live, 31 October 2009
- Charles C. W. Cooke "How Thatcher Came to Be Euroskeptic", National Review, 23 July 2012
- ^ Weßels, Bernhard (1 January 2009). "Spielarten des Euroskeptizismus". In Decker, Frank; Höreth, Marcus (eds.). Die Verfassung Europas (in German). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. pp. 50–68. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91336-0_4. ISBN 978-3-531-15969-0.
- Eichenberg, Richard/ Russell J. Dalton (2007): Post-Maastricht Blues: The Transformation of Citizen Support for European Integration, 1973–2004, in: Acta Politica 42(2–3), P. 128–152. (quoted in Weßels 2009)
- "Tories facing identity crisis". CNN. 8 June 2001. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
- "European Election Results 2009, UK Results". BBC News. 19 April 2009. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
- Stefan George (1990). An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-827563-3.
- Brown, Andrew (15 February 2003). "Scourge and poet". The Guardian.
- ^ Lynch, Philip; Fairclough, Paul (2013). "The European Union". AS UK Government and Politics (Fourth ed.). Hodder Education. pp. 339–340. ISBN 978-1-4441-8352-8.
- Williamson, Andrew (5 May 2015). "The case for Brexit: lessons from the 1960s and 1970s". History & Policy. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
- ^ "The island story that flags up Britain's differences from Europe". Financial Times. 27 November 2016.
- "UKIP Leader Nigel Farage on the Leave EU campaigns". UKIP. Retrieved on 2 January 2016.
- "The Campaign – Vote Leave" Archived 17 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine. Vote Leave. Retrieved on 2 January 2016.
- ^ "Millionaire donors and business leaders back Vote Leave campaign to exit EU". the Guardian. Retrieved on 2 January 2016.
- "The UK's EU referendum: All you need to know". BBC News Online. 20 February 2016. Retrieved 21 February 2016.
- "Transport union to campaign for exit from". RMT. Retrieved 26 April 2022.
- "Why I am voting for Lexit". The Independent. 21 June 2016. Retrieved 26 April 2022.
- "10 Reasons to Leave". Better Off Out. Archived from the original on 3 December 2015. Retrieved 19 November 2015.
- "Our Case". The Democracy Movement. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
- Winnett, R.; Waterfield, B. (31 March 2011). "£300 a year: the cost to each taxpayer of funding EU". London: The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 June 2011.
- Castle, Stephen (26 May 2005). "Barroso survives confidence debate over free holiday with Greek tycoon". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 1 October 2007. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
- Hannan, Daniel (14 November 2007). "Why aren't we shocked by a corrupt EU?". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 16 November 2007. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
- Stewart, Heather (14 July 2016). "Theresa May's decisive reshuffle draws line under Cameron era". The Guardian. London, UK. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
- ^ Boffey, Daniel (21 February 2015). "Majority of electorate would vote for UK to leave EU in latest poll". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 March 2015.
- "Standard Eurobarometer 71 Table of Results, Standard Eurobarometer 71: Public Opinion in the European Union (fieldwork June — July 2009)" (PDF). European Commission. September 2009. Retrieved 1 November 2009.
- "YouGov Survey Results" (PDF). YouGov. 22–23 March 2015. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
- "How Enoch Powell helped to shape modern Tory Euroscepticism". British Politics and Policy at LSE. 7 June 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- Jones, Alistair (Alistair N. ) (2007). Britain and the European Union. Internet Archive. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-3029-5.
- Alexandre-Collier, Agnès (1 November 2015). "Euroscepticism under Margaret Thatcher and David Cameron : From Theory to Practice". Observatoire de la société britannique (17): 115–133. doi:10.4000/osb.1778. ISSN 1775-4135. S2CID 55603749.
- "Nigel Lawson was the economic brain of Thatcherism". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- Helm, Toby; editor, Toby Helm Observer political (7 February 2016). "British Euroscepticism: a brief history". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
{{cite news}}
:|last2=
has generic name (help) - "Mavericks to mainstream: The long campaign for Brexit". BBC News. 29 January 2020. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- Knight, Sam (29 September 2016). "The man who brought you Brexit". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- Mason, Rowena (17 June 2015). "Nigel Farage says he is prepared to lead no campaign in EU referendum". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- Boffey, Daniel (20 February 2016). "Michael Gove: the big beast who gives Eurosceptics the leadership they need". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- Landler, Mark; Castle, Stephen (10 December 2020). "Boris Johnson Once Mocked the Eurocrats of Brussels. They Haven't Forgotten". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- "Profile: Priti Patel". BBC News. 8 November 2017. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- Pickard, Jim (13 February 2020). "Rishi Sunak, the fast-rising Brexiter rewarded by Boris Johnson". Financial Times. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- "View registration – The Electoral Commission". search.electoralcommission.org.uk.
- "MINISTER BLASTS "RELENTLESS CAMPAIGN OF FEAR' OVER BREXIT"". Britainfirst.org. Archived from the original on 6 March 2016. Retrieved 3 March 2016.
- "EU PLOTS MILITARY MERGER IF UK VOTES TO STAY IN". Britainfirst.org. Archived from the original on 6 March 2016. Retrieved 3 March 2016.
- "FOREIGN AFFAIRS".
- Diamond, Professor Patrick (4 October 2016). "The Conservative Party and Brexit". UK in a changing Europe. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- ^ Christopher Hope and Peter Dominiczak (12 April 2016). "Conservative donors prepare to sink £5million into Brexit campaign amid anger about pro-EU leaflet". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 6 May 2016.
- "Home". Archived from the original on 9 May 2015. Retrieved 23 June 2016.
- Socialist Labour Party: The EU Referendum Archived 3 August 2016 at the Wayback Machine
- "Tusc Letter In The Guardian Now Sign The Petition". Tusc.org.uk. 22 February 2016. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 2 March 2016.
- "View registration – The Electoral Commission". search.electoralcommission.org.uk.
- "Respect to campaign to leave the EU". The Respect Party. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016.
- AN INDEPENDENCE FROM EUROPE YOUTUBE. 19 April 2014 – via YouTube.
- "The EU Debate Is Lost No Matter Who Wins". Liberty GB. 21 February 2016. Archived from the original on 6 March 2016. Retrieved 3 March 2016.
Further reading
- Abbott, Lewis F. British Withdrawal from the European Union: A Guide to the Case For. ISR/Google Books, 2013. British Withdrawal from the European Union: A Guide to the Case For
- Booker, C., and North, R., The Great Deception, Continuum Publishing London and New York, 2003. (EU Referendum Edition published by Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, April 2016)
- Gilbert, Mark (23 January 2020), "The Intellectual Origins of Brexit: Enoch Powell, Douglas Jay and the British Dissenting Tradition", Euroscepticisms, Brill, pp. 121–139, doi:10.1163/9789004421257_008, ISBN 978-90-04-42125-7,
- Grob-Fitzgibbon, Benjamin. Continental Drift: Britain and Europe from the End of Empire to the Rise of Euroscepticism (2016) excerpt
- Sutcliffe, John B. "The roots and consequences of Euroskepticism: an evaluation of the United Kingdom Independence Party." Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 4.1 (2012): 107–127. online
- Spiering, Menno. "British euroscepticism." in Robert Harmsen and Menno Spiering, eds. Euroscepticism. (Brill Rodopi, 2004) pp. 127–149.
- Tiersky, Ronald ed. (2001). Euro-skepticism: A Reader. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 103–111. ISBN 9780742510548.
{{cite book}}
:|author=
has generic name (help), primary sources
External links
- Adrian Williamson, The case for Brexit: lessons from the 1960s and 1970s, History and Policy (2015)
2016 referendum on the United Kingdom's membership of the European Union, and Brexit | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Referendum question | "Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?" | ||||||||||||
Referendum legislation | |||||||||||||
Background |
| ||||||||||||
Campaign | |||||||||||||
Campaign organisations |
| ||||||||||||
Aftermath of referendum |
| ||||||||||||
Brexit process | |||||||||||||
Impact of Brexit and potential effects |
| ||||||||||||
Brexit legislation |
| ||||||||||||
Related |
| ||||||||||||
Media depictions |
| ||||||||||||