Misplaced Pages

2009 satellite collision: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:56, 25 October 2014 edit190.163.4.132 (talk) Fallout: say things in one way, not two← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:08, 9 January 2025 edit undo173.187.43.229 (talk)No edit summaryTag: Manual revert 
(173 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|First hypervelocity spacecraft collision}}
{{Update|inaccurate=yes|date=November 2010}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2019}}

{{Multiple image
]
| align = right
]
| total_width = 350

| image1 = Iridium satellite replica.jpg
The '''2009 satellite collision''' was the first accidental ] collision between two intact ] in ].<ref>{{cite journal|title=Satellite Collision Leaves Significant Debris Clouds|journal=Orbital Debris Quarterly News|publisher=NASA Orbital Debris Program Office|volume=13|issue=2|date=April 2009|url=http://www.orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/newsletter/pdfs/ODQNv13i2.pdf|format=PDF|pages=1–2| accessdate= 20 May 2010 <!--DASHBot-->| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20100527132915/http://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/newsletter/pdfs/ODQNv13i2.pdf| archivedate= 27 May 2010| deadurl= no}}</ref> It occurred on February 10, 2009, 16:56 ], when ] and ] collided <ref name="jsr">{{cite web |title=Jonathan's Space Report No. 606 |first=Jonathan |last=McDowell |url=http://host.planet4589.org/space/jsr/back/news.606|date=February 15, 2009 |quote=Strela-2M satellites had lifetimes of around 3 years, and Gen. Yakushin of the Military Space Forces was quoted in Moscow Times as saying Kosmos-2251 went out of service in 1995.|accessdate=2009-02-17}}</ref><ref name="Space">{{cite news | url = http://www.space.com/news/090211-satellite-collision.html | publisher = Space.com | title = U.S. Satellite Destroyed in Space Collision|first=Becky|last=Iannotta|date=February 22, 2009| accessdate= 12 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090213230913/http://www.space.com/news/090211-satellite-collision.html| archivedate= 13 February 2009| deadurl= no}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/11/AR2009021103387.html | title = Debris From Satellites' Collision Said to Pose Small Risk to Space Station|first=Joel |last=Achenbach| publisher = ] | date = February 11, 2009 | accessdate= 12 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->}}</ref> at a speed of 42,120&nbsp;km/h (26,170&nbsp;mi/h).<ref>{{cite news|first=Paul |last=Marks|work= New Scientist|url= http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16604-satellite-collision-more-powerful-than-chinas-asat-test.html |title=Satellite collision 'more powerful than China's ASAT test|date= 13 February 2009| accessdate= 17 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090216135202/http://newscientist.com/article/dn16604-satellite-collision-more-powerful-than-chinas-asat-test.html| archivedate= 16 February 2009| deadurl= no}} (putting the collision speed at 42,120 kilometres per hour (11.7 km/s))</ref><ref>{{cite web |first=Mark K. |last=Matthews |title=Crash imperils satellites that monitor Earth |url=http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/state/orl-satellite1309feb13,0,1752465.story |publisher=Orlando Sentinel |date=2009-02-13 |accessdate=2009-02-17| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090216065243/http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/state/orl-satellite1309feb13,0,1752465.story| archivedate= 16 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= yes}} (reporting it as "what amounted to a 26,000 mph collision")</ref> and an altitude of {{convert|789|km}}<ref name="n2yo">{{cite news | url = http://www.n2yo.com/collision-between-two-satellites.php|title=Collision between Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251|publisher=N2YO| accessdate= 17 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090216151141/http://n2yo.com/collision-between-two-satellites.php| archivedate= 16 February 2009| deadurl= no}}</ref> above the ] in ].
| alt1 =
| caption1 =
| image2 = Strela-2M.jpg
| alt2 =
| caption2 =
| footer = The two satellites involved in the collision: Iridium 33 (silver and gold) and a digital rendering of Kosmos 2251 (blue cylinder)
}}
On February 10, 2009, two ]s—the active commercial ] and the ] Russian military ]—accidentally collided at a speed of {{cvt|11.7|km/s|mph}} and an altitude of {{convert|789|km}} above the ] in ].<ref name="jsr">{{cite web |title=Jonathan's Space Report No. 606 |first=Jonathan |last=McDowell |url=http://host.planet4589.org/space/jsr/back/news.606 |date=February 15, 2009 |quote=Strela-2M satellites had lifetimes of around 3 years, and Gen. Yakushin of the Military Space Forces was quoted in Moscow Times as saying Kosmos-2251 went out of service in 1995. |accessdate=February 17, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170405123635/http://host.planet4589.org/space/jsr/back/news.606 |archive-date=April 5, 2017 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="Space">{{cite news|url=http://www.space.com/news/090211-satellite-collision.html |publisher=Space.com |title=U.S. Satellite Destroyed in Space Collision |first=Becky |last=Iannotta |date=February 22, 2009 |accessdate=February 12, 2009 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090213230913/http://www.space.com/news/090211-satellite-collision.html |archivedate=February 13, 2009 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/11/AR2009021103387.html | title = Debris From Satellites' Collision Said to Pose Small Risk to Space Station|first=Joel |last=Achenbach| newspaper = ] | date = February 11, 2009 | accessdate= February 12, 2009 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Marks |first=Paul |date=February 13, 2009 |title=Satellite collision 'more powerful than China's ASAT test |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16604-satellite-collision-more-powerful-than-chinas-asat-test.html |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090215030344/http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16604-satellite-collision-more-powerful-than-chinas-asat-test.html |archivedate=February 15, 2009 |accessdate=February 17, 2009 |work=New Scientist}} (putting the collision speed at {{Convert|42120|kph|km/s|1}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Matthews |first=Mark K. |date=February 13, 2009 |title=Crash imperils satellites that monitor Earth |url=http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/state/orl-satellite1309feb13,0,1752465.story |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090216065243/http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/state/orl-satellite1309feb13%2C0%2C1752465.story |archivedate=February 16, 2009 |accessdate=February 17, 2009 |publisher=Orlando Sentinel}} (reporting it as "what amounted to a 26,000 mph collision")</ref><ref name="n2yo">{{cite news |url=http://www.n2yo.com/collision-between-two-satellites.php |title=Collision between Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 |publisher=N2YO |accessdate=February 17, 2009 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090216151141/http://n2yo.com/collision-between-two-satellites.php |archivedate=February 16, 2009 |url-status=dead }}</ref> It was the first time a ] ] occurred between two satellites; previous incidents had involved a satellite and a piece of ].<ref>{{cite journal |title=Satellite Collision Leaves Significant Debris Clouds |journal=Orbital Debris Quarterly News |publisher=NASA Orbital Debris Program Office |volume=13 |issue=2 |date=April 2009 |url=http://www.orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/newsletter/pdfs/ODQNv13i2.pdf |pages=1–2 |accessdate=May 20, 2010 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100527132915/http://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/newsletter/pdfs/ODQNv13i2.pdf |archivedate=May 27, 2010 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


==Spacecraft== ==Spacecraft==
{{main|Iridium 33|Kosmos-2251}} {{main|Iridium 33|Kosmos 2251}}
Kosmos 2251 was a {{convert|950|kg|adj=on|-2}} Russian ] military ] owned by the ].<ref name="Russian and US satellites collide"/> Kosmos 2251 was launched on a Russian ] carrier rocket on June 16, 1993.<ref name="Space"/> This satellite had been deactivated prior to the collision, and remained in ] as ].


Kosmos-2251 was a {{convert|950|kg|adj=on|0}} ] military ].<ref name="Russian and US satellites collide"/> It was launched on a ] carrier rocket on June 16, 1993.<ref name="Space"/> It had been deactivated prior to the collision, and remained in ] as ]. Iridium 33 was a {{convert|560|kg|adj=on|0}} satellite and was part of the commercial ] ] of 66 communications satellites.<ref name="Space"/> It was launched on September 14, 1997 atop a ] rocket. The other spacecraft, Iridium{{nbsp}}33, was a {{convert|560|kg|adj=on|-2}} U.S.-built commercial satellite that was part of the ] for satellite phones.<ref name="Space"/> It was launched on September 14, 1997, atop a Russian ] rocket.


==Conjunction and collision==
==Collision==
Events where two satellites approach within several kilometers of each other occur numerous times each day. Sorting through the large number of potential collisions to identify those that are high risk presents a challenge. Precise, up-to-date information regarding current satellite positions is difficult to obtain. Calculations made by CelesTrak had expected these two satellites to miss by {{convert|584|m|ft|abbr=on||}}.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://celestrak.com/events/collision.asp |publisher=CelesTrak |title=Iridium 33/Cosmos 2251 Collision |accessdate=March 18, 2009 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090317043727/http://celestrak.com/events/collision.asp |archivedate=March 17, 2009 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
]


Planning an avoidance maneuver with due consideration of the risk, the fuel consumption required for the maneuver, and its effects on the satellite's normal functioning can also be challenging. John Campbell of Iridium spoke at a June 2007 forum discussing ] and the difficulty of handling all the notifications they were getting regarding close approaches, which numbered 400 per week (for approaches within {{convert|5|km|disp=or|0|abbr=on}}) for the entire Iridium constellation. He estimated the risk of collision per conjunction as one in 50{{nbsp}}million.<ref name="weeden">{{Cite news|magazine=The Space Review |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1314/1 |title=Billiards in space |first=Brian |last=Weeden |date=February 23, 2009 |accessdate=February 24, 2009 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090226195408/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1314/1 |archivedate=February 26, 2009 |url-status=live }}</ref>
The collision destroyed both Iridium 33 (owned by ]) and Kosmos 2251 (owned by the ]). While the Iridium satellite was operational at the time of the collision, the Russian satellite had been out of service since at least 1995 and was no longer actively controlled.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7885051.stm|title=Russian and US satellites collide|date=2009-02-12|publisher=BBC News|quote=Russia has not commented on claims the satellite was out of control |accessdate=2009-02-12| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090212214623/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7885051.stm| archivedate= 12 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref><ref name="Reuters">{{cite news | url = http://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSTRE51A8IA20090211 | title = U.S., Russian satellites collide in space | publisher = Reuters | first = Jim | last = Wolf | date = February 11, 2009 | accessdate= 12 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090215175257/http://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSTRE51A8IA20090211| archivedate= 15 February 2009| deadurl= no}}</ref> Kosmos-2251 was launched on June 16, 1993, and went out of service two years later, in 1995, according to Gen. Yakushin.<ref name="Moscow Times">{{cite news | url = http://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/1010/42/374510.htm | title = First Satellite Collision Called Threat in Space | publisher = Moscow Times | date = February 13, 2009 | accessdate= 19 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->}}</ref>


]
Several smaller collisions had occurred previously, during rendezvous attempts or the intentional destruction of a satellite, including the ] satellite colliding with ],<ref name=dart>{{cite web|url=http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/167813main_RP-06-119_05-020-E_DART_Report_Final_Dec_27.pdf |format=PDF|title=DART Mishap Investigation Board Final Report |date=2007-01-04|accessdate=2009-02-16|publisher=NASA| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090219180802/http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/167813main_RP-06-119_05-020-E_DART_Report_Final_Dec_27.pdf| archivedate= 19 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> and three collisions involving the manned ] space station, during docking attempts by ], Progress M-34, and ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/soyuz.htm|title=Soyuz|last=Wade|first=Mark|publisher=Encyclopedia Astronautica|accessdate=2009-02-12}}</ref> but these were all low-velocity collisions. In 1996, the ] satellite collided with space debris.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/scienceques2003/20040116.htm | title = Is it possible for two orbiting satellites to collide? | first = David | last = Stern | publisher = ] | year = 2004| accessdate= 12 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090120034318/http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/scienceques2003/20040116.htm| archivedate= 20 January 2009| deadurl= no}}</ref> There have been eight known high-speed collisions in all, most of which were only noticed long after they occurred.<ref name="weeden"/>
The collision occurred at 16:56 ] and destroyed both the Iridium 33 and Kosmos-2251. The Iridium satellite was operational at the time of the collision. Kosmos-2251 had gone out of service in 1995.<ref name="Moscow Times">{{cite news | url = http://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/1010/42/374510.htm | archive-url = https://archive.today/20130113200715/http://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/1010/42/374510.htm | url-status = dead | archive-date = January 13, 2013 | title = First Satellite Collision Called Threat in Space | publisher = Moscow Times | date = February 13, 2009 | accessdate = February 19, 2009 }}</ref> It had no propulsion system,<ref>''Игорь Королев''. Авария на $50 млн // Ведомости, № 26 (2296), 13 февраля 2009</ref> and was no longer actively controlled.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7885051.stm|title=Russian and US satellites collide|date=February 12, 2009|work=BBC News|quote=Russia has not commented on claims the satellite was out of control |accessdate=February 12, 2009| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20090212214623/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7885051.stm| archivedate= February 12, 2009 | url-status= live}}</ref><ref name="Reuters">{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSTRE51A8IA20090211 |title=U.S., Russian satellites collide in space |publisher=Reuters |first=Jim |last=Wolf |date=February 11, 2009 |accessdate=February 12, 2009 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090215175257/https://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSTRE51A8IA20090211 |archivedate=February 15, 2009 |url-status=live }}</ref>


<gallery mode=packed heights="200px"> <gallery mode="packed" heights="200px">
File:Collision-1a1.jpg|Point of collision File:Collision-1a1.jpg|Point of collision
File:Collision-20a.jpg|Debris fields after 20 minutes File:Collision-20a.jpg|Debris fields after 20 minutes
Line 25: Line 35:


==Fallout== ==Fallout==
]
]. (2011)]]
], the U.S. space agency, initially estimated ten days after the collision that the satellite space incident had created at least 1,000 pieces of debris larger than {{cvt|10|cm|0}}, in addition to many smaller ones.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2009-02-19-space-junk_N.htm|first=Veronika |last=Oleksyn|title= What a mess! Experts ponder space junk problem|publisher= Associated Press|date= February 19, 2009| accessdate= May 20, 2010 }}</ref> By July 2011, the ] had catalogued over 2000 large debris fragments from the collision.<ref name=Jul_2011>{{cite web|title=Orbital Debris Quarterly News, July 2011 |publisher=NASA Orbital Debris Program Office |url=http://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/newsletter/pdfs/ODQNv15i3.pdf |accessdate=January 1, 2012 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111020092342/http://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/newsletter/pdfs/ODQNv15i3.pdf |archivedate=October 20, 2011 }}</ref> NASA determined the risk to the ], which orbits about {{convert|430|km}} below the collision course, to be low,<ref name="Russian and US satellites collide">{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7885051.stm|title=Russian and US satellites collide|date=February 12, 2009|accessdate=February 12, 2009|publisher=]| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20090212214623/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7885051.stm| archivedate= February 12, 2009 | url-status= live}}</ref><ref name="AP">{{cite news | title = Big satellites collide 500 miles over Siberia | url = http://origin.foxnews.com/wires/2009Feb11/0,4670,SatelliteCollision,00.html | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110711022511/http://origin.foxnews.com/wires/2009Feb11/0,4670,SatelliteCollision,00.html | url-status = dead | archive-date = July 11, 2011 | publisher = The Associated Press | first = Marcia | last = Dunn | date = February 12, 2009 | accessdate = May 20, 2010 }}</ref> as was any threat to the shuttle launch (]) then planned for late February 2009.<ref name="Russian and US satellites collide"/> However, ] scientists have said that the debris does pose a threat to Chinese satellites in ]s,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-02/12/content_10809710.htm |title=China alert on U.S.-Russian satellite collision |publisher=] |date=February 12, 2009 |accessdate=February 12, 2009 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090213132717/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-02/12/content_10809710.htm |archivedate=February 13, 2009 |url-status=dead }}</ref> and the ISS did have to perform an ] due to collision debris in March 2011.<ref name=Jul_2011/>


By December 2011, many smaller pieces of the debris were in an observable ] towards Earth, and were expected ] within one to two years. In 2016, ''Space News'' listed the collision as the second-biggest fragmentation event in history, with Kosmos-2251 and Iridium 33 producing, respectively, 1,668 and 628 pieces of catalogued debris, of which 1,141 and 364 pieces of tracked debris remained in orbit as of January 2016.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.spacenewsmag.com/feature/10-breakups-account-for-13-of-cataloged-debris/|title=10 breakups account for 1/3 of catalogued debris|publisher=Space News|date=April 25, 2016|access-date=June 27, 2017 |archive-date=22 Nov 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122163351/http://www.spacenewsmag.com/feature/10-breakups-account-for-13-of-cataloged-debris/ }}</ref> Fifteen years after the collision the ] listed 916<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.space-track.org/basicspacedata/query/class/satcat_debut/OBJECT_TYPE/DEBRIS/DECAY/null-val/INTLDES/~~1993-036/orderby/INTLDES%20asc/limit/1/metadata/true/emptyresult/show |title=Query INTLDES like 1993-036 and DECAY is NULL and OBJECT_TYPE is DEBRIS |website=space-track.org |url-access=registration |access-date=Feb 14, 2024 }}</ref> and 212<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.space-track.org/basicspacedata/query/class/satcat_debut/OBJECT_TYPE/DEBRIS/DECAY/null-val/INTLDES/~~1997-051/orderby/INTLDES%20asc/limit/1/metadata/true/emptyresult/show |title=Query INTLDES like 1997-051 and DECAY is NULL and OBJECT_TYPE is DEBRIS |website=space-track.org |url-access=registration |access-date=Feb 14, 2024 }}</ref> debris still in orbit, respectively.
]
]]]
U.S. space agency ] estimated that the satellite collision created approximately 1,000 pieces of debris larger than 10 centimeters (4&nbsp;inches), in addition to many smaller ones.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2009-02-19-space-junk_N.htm|first=Veronika |last=Oleksyn|title= What a mess! Experts ponder space junk problem|publisher= Associated Press|date= February 19, 2009| accessdate= 20 May 2010 <!--DASHBot-->}}</ref> By July 2011, the ] had cataloged over 2000 large debris fragments.<ref name=Jul_2011>{{cite web|title=Orbital Debris Quarterly News, July 2011|publisher=NASA Orbital Debris Program Office|url=http://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/newsletter/pdfs/ODQNv15i3.pdf|format=PDF|accessdate=2012-01-01}}</ref> NASA determined the risk to the ], which orbits about {{convert|430|km}} below the collision course, to be low,<ref name="Russian and US satellites collide">{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7885051.stm|title=Russian and US satellites collide|date=2009-02-12|accessdate=2009-02-12|publisher=]| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090212214623/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7885051.stm| archivedate= 12 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref><ref name="AP">{{cite news | title = Big satellites collide 500 miles over Siberia | url = http://origin.foxnews.com/wires/2009Feb11/0,4670,SatelliteCollision,00.html| publisher = The Associated Press | first = Marcia | last = Dunn | date = February 12, 2009 | accessdate= 20 May 2010 <!--DASHBot-->}}</ref> as was any threat to the shuttle launch (]) then planned for late February 2009.<ref name="Russian and US satellites collide"/> However, ] scientists have said that the debris does pose a threat to Chinese satellites in ]s,<ref>{{cite web | url = http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-02/12/content_10809710.htm | title = China alert on U.S.-Russian satellite collision | publisher = ] | date = February 12, 2009| accessdate= 12 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090213132717/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-02/12/content_10809710.htm| archivedate= 13 February 2009| deadurl= no}}</ref> and the ISS did have to perform an avoidance maneuver due to collision debris in March 2011.<ref name=Jul_2011/>


A small piece of Kosmos-2251 satellite debris safely passed by the International Space Station at 2:38&nbsp;a.m. EDT, Saturday, March 24, 2012, at a distance of approximately {{cvt|120|m}}. As a precaution, ISS management had the six crew members on board the orbiting complex take refuge inside the two docked Soyuz rendezvous spacecraft until the debris had passed.<ref>{{Cite AV media |title=Orbital Debris Safely Passes International Space Station |time=23 minutes 30 seconds |type=Web Broadcast |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kw5zkf2ZfvA |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211220/Kw5zkf2ZfvA |archive-date=2021-12-20 |url-status=live|publisher=] |date=March 23, 2012 |accessdate=March 23, 2012}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
By December 2011, many pieces of debris ] towards Earth, and expected ] within one or two years. By January 2014 24% of the known debris had decayed.


A number of reports of phenomena in the ]s of ], ], and ] were attributed to debris from the collision in the days immediately following the first reports of the incident in 2009,<ref name=rawstory>{{cite news|first=Joe |last=Byrne |url=http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Satellite_wreckage_falls_on_Kentucky_Texas_0215.html |title=Satellite wreckage falls on Kentucky, Texas, New Mexico |date=February 15, 2009 |accessdate=February 16, 2009 |publisher=] |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090217204710/http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Satellite_wreckage_falls_on_Kentucky_Texas_0215.html |archivedate=February 17, 2009 }}</ref> although NASA and the ], which tracks satellites and orbital debris, did not announce any reentries of debris at the time<ref name=tonynasa>{{cite web |first=Tony |last=Phillips |title=Fireball Mania |url=http://spaceweather.com/glossary/fireballmania.htm |publisher=] |date=February 14, 2009 |accessdate=December 14, 2011}}</ref> and reported that these phenomena were unrelated to the collision.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6264797.html|title=Metallic meteorite likely sent fireball across Texas sky|first=Eric|last=Berger|first2=Mark|last2=Carreau|date=February 16, 2009|accessdate=February 16, 2009|publisher=]}}</ref> On February 13, 2009, witnesses in Kentucky heard ]s.<ref name=kentucky>{{cite news|url=http://www.wkyt.com/wymtnews/headlines/39600862.html |title=Satellites Collide; Debris Seen Falling Over Kentucky|date=February 13, 2009|accessdate=February 16, 2009|publisher=] News| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20090217044025/http://www.wkyt.com/wymtnews/headlines/39600862.html| archivedate= February 17, 2009 | url-status= dead}}</ref> The ] issued an information statement alerting residents of sonic booms due to the falling satellite debris.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.crh.noaa.gov/product.php?site=JKL&product=PNS&issuedby=JKL |title=...POSSIBLE SATELLITE DEBRIS FALLING ACROSS THE REGION...|date=February 13, 2009|accessdate=February 16, 2009|publisher=]| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20090217071308/http://www.crh.noaa.gov/product.php?site=JKL&product=PNS&issuedby=JKL| archivedate= February 17, 2009 | url-status= live}}</ref> The ] also released a notice warning to pilots of the re-entering debris.<ref>{{cite news|first=William|last=Harwood|url=http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/15debris/|title=FAA warns of possible falling satellite debris|date=February 15, 2009|accessdate=February 16, 2009|publisher=] Space Place| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20090219165031/http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/15debris/| archivedate= February 19, 2009 | url-status= live}}</ref> Some reports include details that point to these phenomena being caused by a ].<ref name="tonynasa"/> A very bright ] over Texas on February 15, 2009, was mistaken for reentering debris by some witnesses.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/15/texas-fireball-whats-known-so-far/|title=Texas Fireball: What's known so far|first=Phil|last=Plait|date=February 15, 2009|publisher=Bad Astronomy blog|accessdate=February 17, 2009|archive-date=November 24, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101124134530/http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/15/texas-fireball-whats-known-so-far/|url-status=dead}}</ref>
A small piece of Kosmos 2251 satellite debris safely passed by the International Space Station at 2:38&nbsp;a.m. EDT, Saturday, March 24, 2012. As a precaution, the six crew members on board the orbiting complex took refuge inside the two docked Soyuz rendezvous spacecraft until the debris had passed.<ref>{{Cite AV media |title=Orbital Debris Safely Passes International Space Station |time=23 minutes 30 seconds |type=Web Broadcast |url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kw5zkf2ZfvA |publisher=] |date=2012-03-23 |accessdate=2012-03-23}}</ref>


This collision and numerous near-misses have renewed calls for mandatory disposal of defunct satellites (typically by ] them, or at minimum, sending them to a ]), but no such international law exists as of 2024. Nevertheless, some countries have adopted such a law domestically, such as France in December 2010.<ref>{{cite web |first=Glenn H |last=Reynolds |url=http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/air_space/4303567.html |title=Space Junk and the Law of Space Collisions |date=March 12, 2009 |publisher=Popular Mechanics |accessdate=March 18, 2009 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090316163533/http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/air_space/4303567.html |archivedate=March 16, 2009 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The United States ] (FCC) requires all geostationary satellites launched after March 18, 2002 to commit to moving to a ] at the end of their operational life.<ref>{{cite web |last=de Selding |first=Peter |date=June 28, 2004 |title=FCC Enters Orbital Debris Debate |url=http://www.space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_040628.html |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20040701012010/http://www.space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_040628.html |archive-date=July 1, 2004 |publisher=Space News}}</ref>
A number of reports of ] in Texas, Kentucky, and New Mexico were attributed to debris from the collision in the days immediately following the first reports of the incident in 2009,<ref name=rawstory>{{cite news|first=Joe|last=Byrne|url=http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Satellite_wreckage_falls_on_Kentucky_Texas_0215.html| title=Satellite wreckage falls on Kentucky, Texas, New Mexico|date=2009-02-15|accessdate=2009-02-16|publisher=]}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> although NASA and the ], which tracks satellites and orbital debris, did not announce any reentries of debris at the time<ref name=tonynasa>{{cite web |first=Tony |last=Phillips |title=Fireball Mania |url=http://spaceweather.com/glossary/fireballmania.htm |publisher=] |date=2009-02-14 |accessdate=2011-12-14}}</ref> and reported that these phenomena were unrelated to the collision.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6264797.html|title=Metallic meteorite likely sent fireball across Texas sky|first1=Eric|last1=Berger|first2=Mark|last2=Carreau|date=2009-02-16|accessdate=2009-02-16|publisher=]}}</ref> On February 13, 2009, witnesses in ] heard ]s.<ref name=kentucky>{{cite news|url=http://www.wkyt.com/wymtnews/headlines/39600862.html |title=Satellites Collide; Debris Seen Falling Over Kentucky|date=2009-02-13|accessdate=2009-02-16|publisher=] News| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090217044025/http://www.wkyt.com/wymtnews/headlines/39600862.html| archivedate= 17 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= yes}}</ref> The ] issued an information statement alerting residents of sonic booms due to the falling satellite debris.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.crh.noaa.gov/product.php?site=JKL&product=PNS&issuedby=JKL |title=...POSSIBLE SATELLITE DEBRIS FALLING ACROSS THE REGION...|date=2009-02-13|accessdate=2009-02-16|publisher=]| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090217071308/http://www.crh.noaa.gov/product.php?site=JKL&product=PNS&issuedby=JKL| archivedate= 17 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> The ] also released a notice warning pilots of the re-entering debris.<ref>{{cite news|first=William|last=Harwood|url=http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/15debris/|title=FAA warns of possible falling satellite debris|date=2009-02-15|accessdate=2009-02-16|publisher=] Space Place| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090219165031/http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0902/15debris/| archivedate= 19 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> Some reports include details that point to these phenomena being caused by a ].<ref name="tonynasa"/> A ] over Texas on February 15 was mistaken for reentering debris.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/15/texas-fireball-whats-known-so-far/ |title=Texas Fireball: What's known so far|first= Phil |last=Plait|date= February 15, 2009|publisher= Bad Astronomy blog| accessdate= 17 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->}}</ref>

==Cause==
Events where two satellites approach within several kilometers of each other occur numerous times each day. Sorting through the large number of potential collisions to identify those that are high risk presents a challenge. Precise, up-to-date information regarding current satellite positions is difficult to obtain. Calculations made by ] had expected these two satellites to miss by 584 meters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://celestrak.com/events/collision.asp |publisher=CelesTrak|title= Iridium 33/Cosmos 2251 Collision| accessdate= 18 March 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090317043727/http://celestrak.com/events/collision.asp| archivedate= 17 March 2009| deadurl= no}}</ref>

Planning an avoidance maneuver with due consideration of the risk, the fuel consumption required for the maneuver, and its effects on the satellite's normal functioning can also be challenging. John Campbell of Iridium spoke at a June 2007 forum discussing ] and the difficulty of handling all the notifications they were getting regarding close approaches, which numbered 400 per week (for approaches within 5&nbsp;km) for the entire Iridium constellation. He estimated the risk of collision per conjunction as one in 50 million.<ref name="weeden">{{Cite news | magazine=The Space Review | url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1314/1 | title=Billiards in space | first=Brian |last=Weeden | date=2009-02-23 | accessdate= 24 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090226195408/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1314/1| archivedate= 26 February 2009| deadurl= no}}</ref>

This collision and numerous near-misses have renewed calls for mandatory disposal of defunct satellites (typically by ] them or at minimum sending them in ]), but no such international law exists yet. Nevertheless, some countries have adopted such a law, such as France in December 2010.<ref>{{cite web|first=Glenn H|last=Reynolds|url=http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/air_space/4303567.html |title=Space Junk and the Law of Space Collisions|date=March 12, 2009|publisher= Popular Mechanics| accessdate= 18 March 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090316163533/http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/air_space/4303567.html| archivedate= 16 March 2009| deadurl= no}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
* ] – another large space debris creation event
* ] (Ablation cascade) a positive feed-back loop where space debris creates more debris until all orbits are prohibited.
* ] – first-known anti-satellite weapon test
* ] A proposed method of getting rid of space debris
* ] (ablation cascade) a positive feedback loop where space debris creates more debris until all orbits are prohibited
* ] – a proposed method of getting rid of space debris
* ]
* ] – largest recorded space debris creation event
* ]
* ] * ]

==References==
{{reflist|30em}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{wikinewshas|news coverage of the 2009 satellite collision {{Wikinews|has=news coverage of the 2009 satellite collision| Russian and US satellites collide| Burning debris from satellites spotted over several US cities}}
* {{Cite news |last=Courtland |first=Rachel |date=February 13, 2009 |title=Satellite crash prediction is plagued with uncertainty |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16592-satellite-crash-prediction-is-plagued-with-uncertainty.html |magazine=] |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090305073200/http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16592-satellite-crash-prediction-is-plagued-with-uncertainty.html |archive-date=March 5, 2009 |url-status= live |access-date=February 13, 2009}}
* ]
*
* ]}}
*
* {{cite news |title=Satellite crash prediction is plagued with uncertainty |date=February 13, 2009|first=Rachel |last=Courtland |url= http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16592-satellite-crash-prediction-is-plagued-with-uncertainty.html |publisher=] |accessdate=2009-02-13| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20090216103320/http://newscientist.com/article/dn16592-satellite-crash-prediction-is-plagued-with-uncertainty.html| archivedate= 16 February 2009 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
* *
*
*


{{Authority control}}
==References==
{{reflist|2}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:2009 Satellite Collision}} {{DEFAULTSORT:2009 Satellite Collision}}
] ]
]
]
] ]

Latest revision as of 01:08, 9 January 2025

First hypervelocity spacecraft collision

The two satellites involved in the collision: Iridium 33 (silver and gold) and a digital rendering of Kosmos 2251 (blue cylinder)

On February 10, 2009, two communications satellites—the active commercial Iridium 33 and the derelict Russian military Kosmos 2251—accidentally collided at a speed of 11.7 km/s (26,000 mph) and an altitude of 789 kilometres (490 mi) above the Taymyr Peninsula in Siberia. It was the first time a hypervelocity collision occurred between two satellites; previous incidents had involved a satellite and a piece of space debris.

Spacecraft

Main articles: Iridium 33 and Kosmos 2251

Kosmos 2251 was a 950-kilogram (2,100 lb) Russian Strela military communications satellite owned by the Russian Space Forces. Kosmos 2251 was launched on a Russian Cosmos-3M carrier rocket on June 16, 1993. This satellite had been deactivated prior to the collision, and remained in orbit as space debris.

The other spacecraft, Iridium 33, was a 560-kilogram (1,200 lb) U.S.-built commercial satellite that was part of the Iridium constellation for satellite phones. It was launched on September 14, 1997, atop a Russian Proton rocket.

Conjunction and collision

Events where two satellites approach within several kilometers of each other occur numerous times each day. Sorting through the large number of potential collisions to identify those that are high risk presents a challenge. Precise, up-to-date information regarding current satellite positions is difficult to obtain. Calculations made by CelesTrak had expected these two satellites to miss by 584 m (1,916 ft).

Planning an avoidance maneuver with due consideration of the risk, the fuel consumption required for the maneuver, and its effects on the satellite's normal functioning can also be challenging. John Campbell of Iridium spoke at a June 2007 forum discussing these tradeoffs and the difficulty of handling all the notifications they were getting regarding close approaches, which numbered 400 per week (for approaches within 5 km or 3 mi) for the entire Iridium constellation. He estimated the risk of collision per conjunction as one in 50 million.

Collision diagram

The collision occurred at 16:56 UTC and destroyed both the Iridium 33 and Kosmos-2251. The Iridium satellite was operational at the time of the collision. Kosmos-2251 had gone out of service in 1995. It had no propulsion system, and was no longer actively controlled.

  • Point of collision Point of collision
  • Debris fields after 20 minutes Debris fields after 20 minutes
  • Debris fields after 50 minutes Debris fields after 50 minutes

Fallout

Flashes created by the tumbling main body of the Iridium 33 wreckage
The collision resulted in significant debris in low Earth orbit. (2011)

NASA, the U.S. space agency, initially estimated ten days after the collision that the satellite space incident had created at least 1,000 pieces of debris larger than 10 cm (4 in), in addition to many smaller ones. By July 2011, the U.S. Space Surveillance Network had catalogued over 2000 large debris fragments from the collision. NASA determined the risk to the International Space Station, which orbits about 430 kilometres (270 mi) below the collision course, to be low, as was any threat to the shuttle launch (STS-119) then planned for late February 2009. However, Chinese scientists have said that the debris does pose a threat to Chinese satellites in Sun-synchronous orbits, and the ISS did have to perform an avoidance maneuver due to collision debris in March 2011.

By December 2011, many smaller pieces of the debris were in an observable orbital decay towards Earth, and were expected to burn up in the atmosphere within one to two years. In 2016, Space News listed the collision as the second-biggest fragmentation event in history, with Kosmos-2251 and Iridium 33 producing, respectively, 1,668 and 628 pieces of catalogued debris, of which 1,141 and 364 pieces of tracked debris remained in orbit as of January 2016. Fifteen years after the collision the U.S. Space Surveillance Catalog listed 916 and 212 debris still in orbit, respectively.

A small piece of Kosmos-2251 satellite debris safely passed by the International Space Station at 2:38 a.m. EDT, Saturday, March 24, 2012, at a distance of approximately 120 m (390 ft). As a precaution, ISS management had the six crew members on board the orbiting complex take refuge inside the two docked Soyuz rendezvous spacecraft until the debris had passed.

A number of reports of phenomena in the U.S. states of Texas, Kentucky, and New Mexico were attributed to debris from the collision in the days immediately following the first reports of the incident in 2009, although NASA and the United States Strategic Command, which tracks satellites and orbital debris, did not announce any reentries of debris at the time and reported that these phenomena were unrelated to the collision. On February 13, 2009, witnesses in Kentucky heard sonic booms. The National Weather Service issued an information statement alerting residents of sonic booms due to the falling satellite debris. The Federal Aviation Administration also released a notice warning to pilots of the re-entering debris. Some reports include details that point to these phenomena being caused by a meteoroid shower. A very bright meteor over Texas on February 15, 2009, was mistaken for reentering debris by some witnesses.

This collision and numerous near-misses have renewed calls for mandatory disposal of defunct satellites (typically by deorbiting them, or at minimum, sending them to a graveyard orbit), but no such international law exists as of 2024. Nevertheless, some countries have adopted such a law domestically, such as France in December 2010. The United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requires all geostationary satellites launched after March 18, 2002 to commit to moving to a graveyard orbit at the end of their operational life.

See also

References

  1. McDowell, Jonathan (February 15, 2009). "Jonathan's Space Report No. 606". Archived from the original on April 5, 2017. Retrieved February 17, 2009. Strela-2M satellites had lifetimes of around 3 years, and Gen. Yakushin of the Military Space Forces was quoted in Moscow Times as saying Kosmos-2251 went out of service in 1995.
  2. ^ Iannotta, Becky (February 22, 2009). "U.S. Satellite Destroyed in Space Collision". Space.com. Archived from the original on February 13, 2009. Retrieved February 12, 2009.
  3. Achenbach, Joel (February 11, 2009). "Debris From Satellites' Collision Said to Pose Small Risk to Space Station". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 12, 2009.
  4. Marks, Paul (February 13, 2009). "Satellite collision 'more powerful than China's ASAT test". New Scientist. Archived from the original on February 15, 2009. Retrieved February 17, 2009. (putting the collision speed at 42,120 kilometres per hour (11.7 km/s)
  5. Matthews, Mark K. (February 13, 2009). "Crash imperils satellites that monitor Earth". Orlando Sentinel. Archived from the original on February 16, 2009. Retrieved February 17, 2009. (reporting it as "what amounted to a 26,000 mph collision")
  6. "Collision between Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251". N2YO. Archived from the original on February 16, 2009. Retrieved February 17, 2009.
  7. "Satellite Collision Leaves Significant Debris Clouds" (PDF). Orbital Debris Quarterly News. 13 (2). NASA Orbital Debris Program Office: 1–2. April 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 27, 2010. Retrieved May 20, 2010.
  8. ^ "Russian and US satellites collide". BBC. February 12, 2009. Archived from the original on February 12, 2009. Retrieved February 12, 2009.
  9. "Iridium 33/Cosmos 2251 Collision". CelesTrak. Archived from the original on March 17, 2009. Retrieved March 18, 2009.
  10. Weeden, Brian (February 23, 2009). "Billiards in space". The Space Review. Archived from the original on February 26, 2009. Retrieved February 24, 2009.
  11. "First Satellite Collision Called Threat in Space". Moscow Times. February 13, 2009. Archived from the original on January 13, 2013. Retrieved February 19, 2009.
  12. Игорь Королев. Авария на $50 млн // Ведомости, № 26 (2296), 13 февраля 2009
  13. "Russian and US satellites collide". BBC News. February 12, 2009. Archived from the original on February 12, 2009. Retrieved February 12, 2009. Russia has not commented on claims the satellite was out of control
  14. Wolf, Jim (February 11, 2009). "U.S., Russian satellites collide in space". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 15, 2009. Retrieved February 12, 2009.
  15. Oleksyn, Veronika (February 19, 2009). "What a mess! Experts ponder space junk problem". Associated Press. Retrieved May 20, 2010.
  16. ^ "Orbital Debris Quarterly News, July 2011" (PDF). NASA Orbital Debris Program Office. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 20, 2011. Retrieved January 1, 2012.
  17. Dunn, Marcia (February 12, 2009). "Big satellites collide 500 miles over Siberia". The Associated Press. Archived from the original on July 11, 2011. Retrieved May 20, 2010.
  18. "China alert on U.S.-Russian satellite collision". Xinhua. February 12, 2009. Archived from the original on February 13, 2009. Retrieved February 12, 2009.
  19. "10 breakups account for 1/3 of catalogued debris". Space News. April 25, 2016. Archived from the original on November 22, 2020. Retrieved June 27, 2017.
  20. "Query INTLDES like 1993-036 and DECAY is NULL and OBJECT_TYPE is DEBRIS". space-track.org. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  21. "Query INTLDES like 1997-051 and DECAY is NULL and OBJECT_TYPE is DEBRIS". space-track.org. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  22. Orbital Debris Safely Passes International Space Station (Web Broadcast). National Aeronautics and Space Association. March 23, 2012. Event occurs at 23 minutes 30 seconds. Archived from the original on December 20, 2021. Retrieved March 23, 2012.
  23. Byrne, Joe (February 15, 2009). "Satellite wreckage falls on Kentucky, Texas, New Mexico". The Raw Story. Archived from the original on February 17, 2009. Retrieved February 16, 2009.
  24. ^ Phillips, Tony (February 14, 2009). "Fireball Mania". National Aeronautics and Space Association. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  25. Berger, Eric; Carreau, Mark (February 16, 2009). "Metallic meteorite likely sent fireball across Texas sky". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved February 16, 2009.
  26. "Satellites Collide; Debris Seen Falling Over Kentucky". WYMT News. February 13, 2009. Archived from the original on February 17, 2009. Retrieved February 16, 2009.
  27. "...POSSIBLE SATELLITE DEBRIS FALLING ACROSS THE REGION..." NOAA. February 13, 2009. Archived from the original on February 17, 2009. Retrieved February 16, 2009.
  28. Harwood, William (February 15, 2009). "FAA warns of possible falling satellite debris". CBS News Space Place. Archived from the original on February 19, 2009. Retrieved February 16, 2009.
  29. Plait, Phil (February 15, 2009). "Texas Fireball: What's known so far". Bad Astronomy blog. Archived from the original on November 24, 2010. Retrieved February 17, 2009.
  30. Reynolds, Glenn H (March 12, 2009). "Space Junk and the Law of Space Collisions". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on March 16, 2009. Retrieved March 18, 2009.
  31. de Selding, Peter (June 28, 2004). "FCC Enters Orbital Debris Debate". Space News. Archived from the original on July 1, 2004.

External links

Categories: