| Revision as of 02:36, 30 October 2014 edit190.163.4.132 (talk) Certainly an Englishman, it was more doubtful whether Phileas Fogg was a Londoner← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:06, 17 January 2023 edit undoBD2412 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators2,457,142 editsm blank ancient IP talk page messagesTags: AWB Replaced | ||
| (37 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| == Welcome to Misplaced Pages! == | |||
| Hello, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] and ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| You are welcome to continue editing without ], but you may want to consider '''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see ]. If you edit without a username, your ] (190.163.4.132) is used to identify you instead. | |||
| In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on ], or ask your question and then place <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> before the question on this page. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:welcome-anon --> ] <span style="border:1px solid #ffa500;background:#ffce7b;"><small>If you reply here, please leave me a {{]}} message on ].</small></span> @ 02:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| *Sorry, I can't let you insult other editors. ] (]) 03:02, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :*Fair enough. I only wish people would be equally willing to block the editors who have spent so long attacking me and destroying my work for no good reason. I think reverting for no good reason with false accusations is far, far more damaging to the encyclopaedia that calling someone an "idiot" ever could be, but perhaps we disagree on that. Good night. ] (]) 03:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::You are editing in violation of a block (actually several). You are making personal attacks in violation of ]. "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a block, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule." Boo hoo. - ] (]) 03:36, 25 October 2014 (UTC) (a.k.a. the "fucking retarded little cunt") | |||
| ::::And so you turn up to taunt me. You disruptively reverted masses of my edits, restoring false information to prominent articles, while making dishonest accusations at the same time. And apparently you feel proud enough of that to turn up here and taunt me. You are a true asset to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 03:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::And once again you are working tirelessly to restore copyright violations, factual errors and basic mistakes to articles. Well done, you. Well done. *claps wildly*. The reputation Misplaced Pages has for reliability and integrity is thanks to people like you. | |||
| :::::By the way, falsely accusing someone of being banned, just so that you can thrill yourself by undoing their edits, is a grievous personal attack. I wait expectantly for someone to tell you that you shouldn't have done that, and for an apology from you. ] (]) 03:55, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::So go on, why not restore the incorrect use of first names to those tennis articles? Your mission is to provoke me as much as possible, right? Without regard to the quality of the encyclopaedia? So why are you holding back? ] (]) 03:58, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Editing archives == | |||
| I saw and wondered if you really meant to edit archives which is a waste of time and whether you meant to say "I have used more than one account, never used even one account" because, just to me, this appears a little self-contradictory given your recent rampage through Misplaced Pages under the current IP correcting "obvious" errors. ] (]) 21:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I explained why I was editing an archive in the edit summary. Did you read that? I did unfortunately miss out a "never", however. I am not sure how not using an account would be contradictory with the statement that I have never used an account, and I am not sure why you would use the pejorative term "rampage" and put the word ''obvious'' in scare quotes to describe my edits. ] (]) 21:35, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Carry on! ] (]) 21:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == October 2014 == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span> | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| *<nowiki>The European Research Council</nowiki>{{red|''']'''}}<nowiki> (ERC) is a pan-European research funding organisation. It was created by the EU in 2007.</nowiki> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, -1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 00:17, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you ] Misplaced Pages again, you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> ] (]) 09:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| ::The article in question, ], was previously edit protected due to edits made in defiance of a block by this IP user, ]. I would strongly suggest that the user discuss the issue on the article's talk page. - ] (]) 14:03, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Block evasion ]== | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-block --> <b>] ]</b> 18:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|The usual claim of disruptive editing - not true, never has been. As usual, false accusations are not just tolerated but encouraged.] (]) 18:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)|decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that | |||
| *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, <u>or</u> | |||
| *the block is no longer necessary because you | |||
| :#understand what you have been blocked for, | |||
| :#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and | |||
| :#will make useful contributions instead. | |||
| Please read the ] for more information. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 18:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| : As has been made clear before in previous blocks, you are blocked for block evasion. I've customized the standard block notification template to be more specific to your case. I hope that is satisfactory. <b>] ]</b> 18:17, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=Indeed, the least one could hope for is basic honesty in the message to people you're going to block. As for this block: "''you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages''". They could just have a look at and see that none of them damaged or disrupted Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 6:35 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0) | decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that | |||
| *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, <u>or</u> | |||
| *the block is no longer necessary because you | |||
| :#understand what you have been blocked for, | |||
| :#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and | |||
| :#will make useful contributions instead. | |||
| Please read the ] for more information. ] ]] 08:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| <s>Perhaps in the meantime, someone would like to convey to that I accept their apology, and instruct them in the basic practice of not reverting for no reason. ] (])</s> | |||
| Perhaps someone would like to tell that user that posting some kind of "apology" on their talk page in which they dishonestly made it look as if I had signed their comment, and then immediately afterwards reverting two more edits for no reason is extremely offensive and damaging. ] (]) 04:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unstoppable trolling== | |||
| And so the trolling continues, as always. The repetitive refusals to unblock which expect me to prove a negative must be jolly good fun for the admins concerned. An admin protecting the noticeboard page and applying a range block specifically to prevent me from continuing the discussion, just as it was beginning to appear productive - that was very good work. The continuing effort of ] to restore nonsense to the encyclopaedia is amusing to watch, as is their descent into ever more infantile language to try to justify what they are doing. And their , showing that they don't understand what it is, or that they are simply trying to provoke me even more, or most likely both. And their behaviour encourages more trolls to join in the hilarity, of course. Now we have a brand new editor , and . And we have ] who must have enjoyed . And not just any copyright violation but a spectacularly badly written and unencyclopaedic one as well. Plainly, his intention is not to improve the encyclopaedia. Leaving surely tickled him greatly as well. And his that the MOS can be ignored under the brave assumption that English speakers will find Dutch, French and Spanish articles useful... what can one say. If someone created the articles for which a Spanish one exists, I'd translate them, but obviously people with particular mentalities would then undo that work repeatedly over many months. | |||
| And then there's Wee Curry Monster, ranting about persecution complexes. A persecution complex is a belief in persecution where none exists. Wee Curry Monster did not understand the grammar of a sentence, so rather than ask about it or try to improve it, he simply reverted it, and then stalked my edits to all the unrelated articles I'd been working on and reverted them all, with no explanation other than edit summaries like "". And then he has the cheek to to "have gone to extra lengths to explain myself to him", while denigrating my contributions, and claiming that I have a persecution complex. Is he deliberately trolling or is it just that he's so inept he doesn't even realise what he's doing? | |||
| So, well, there we were, trying to resolve things fairly, and someone decided they knew better than everyone else what was required in the situation, and blocked me and protected the page. No-one questioned them about that so I take it that people prefer to carry on as before. If people really want to spend ''nearly four months'' fighting to support the of ] and his ilk, then so be it, let's carry on doing things like that. If it gives you so much satisfaction to waste your time undoing my work in a deliberate effort to harm the encyclopaedia, then you'd better just carry on, hadn't you. | |||
| Thanks to the two administrators who seemed to understand that years of constant baiting and attacks don't bring out the best in people. Sorry that you were outnumbered by the people who enjoy the baiting. ] (]) 01:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Postscript== | |||
| My rule of wikipedia is that complaining about false accusations of vandalism will generate at least three further false accusations. And now it appears that a complaint about trolling will result in . Fun for everyone, I guess. ] (]) 01:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:06, 17 January 2023
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.