| Revision as of 16:41, 19 November 2014 editWifione (talk | contribs)16,760 edits →November 2014: add← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:17, 6 December 2014 edit undoBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,940 edits You have been blocked from editing. (TW) | ||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == You are not learning == | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| It has been noted that since the last three times, you have twice again reverted the same edit, and again broken the 1RR. If you cannot get consensus from editors for your change, you cannot make the change. This is one of the basic rules of Misplaced Pages editing - see ]. There is no point in blanking your Talk page; any editor or admin can read it using the View History page. Perhaps you could explain on the Talk page why you want this edit, as it is not clear how "extremist" relates to "Khawarij". Can you do this, please? ~ ] (]) 10:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| You will be blocked | |||
| ==Serious== | |||
| ] ] 18:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Notification == | |||
| I have reported your 1RR infringement at ]. | |||
| ] (]) 18:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == November 2014 == | == November 2014 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for ] and violating the ], as you did at ]. In accordance with a ] and ] on August 2013, <u>editors of this article are restricted to 1 ] per 24 hours when reverting logged-in users</u>. See ] for further details. Violations of this restriction will lead to blocks or other sanctions (such as page or topic bans). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] ] 02:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | |||
| ] Hello, and ]. You appear to be engaged in an ] with one or more editors according to your reverts at ]. Although repeatedly ] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the ], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a ] on the ]. | |||
| == General sanctions: Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A ] has authorised the use of ] for pages related to the ] and the ]. The details of these sanctions are described ]. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a ''']''', as described ]. | |||
| ] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged ]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. ] (]) 12:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| | Commons-emblem-notice.svg | |||
| | icon size = 50px}} | |||
| == Swaywoof, STOP USING THIS LOGIN!!! == | |||
| '''PLEASE LISTEN''' | |||
| You will get banned for an extremely long time IF you don't play by the rules. '''DO NOT''' continue to use the login Swaywoof. | |||
| You did not listen to me before and YOU GOT BANNED. | |||
| LISTEN NOW. | |||
| WAIT! WATCH! READ! but '''DON'T''' edit. | |||
| Have some respect for others and the rules of Misplaced Pages. | |||
| Do not continue with Swaywoof or any other login or '''things will be bad for you'''. | |||
| You do not reply to others and think that you can just carry on with what you want without responding. | |||
| ] ] 20:17, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Khawarij == | ||
| A content was added to the talk page as follows: | |||
| Khawarij is a word mentioned in Hadith to define Islamic Extremist in the 7th century. | |||
| Narrated Yusair bin 'Amr: I asked Sahl bin Hunaif, "Did you hear the Prophet saying anything about Al-Khawarij?" He said, "I heard him saying while pointing his hand towards Iraq. "There will appear in it (i.e, Iraq) some people who will recite the Quran but it will not go beyond their throats, and they will go out from (leave) Islam as an arrow darts through the game's body.' " | |||
| This is clear example that Khawarij are Islamic extremists | |||
| I am genuinely interested. Why don't you add any points to this. Where in the Hadith? | |||
| ] ] 21:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Sock-puppet investigation== | |||
| It is suspected that you have opened an account in the name of Swaywoof in order to continue pursuing your edits. This is called sock-puppeting and is serious. An investigation into this has been opened today. General information on sock-puppeting is at ] and your case is listed at ]. You will find your name in the list and if you click on it, it will take you to your case. For ease of reference, this is the link that will take you directly to your case . Please note that you do have the right to defend yourself, in the part near the end under "Comments by other users". In small writing it says that you can add your comments and there is a link "Defending yourself against claims" to help you with this. ~ ] (]) 12:39, 21 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :You must keep to the rules, Mohammed. If you don't, you could be blocked ''altogether'' from editing in Misplaced Pages. This has happened to editors before who have not kept to the rules. Remember you can give your explanation for this new account in the section I guided you to. I would imagine your inexperience as a new editor will be taken into account. ~ ] (]) 16:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Details of the second account you are suspected to have opened using the name ] have been added to the SPI investigation form . Remember you have the right to defend yourself as explained above. ~ ] (]) 16:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == December 2014 == | |||
| If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. More importantly, in articles like ], an editor must not perform more than ] within a 24-hour period. In accordance with a ] and ] on August 2013, <u>editors of this article are restricted to 1 ] per 24 hours when reverting logged-in users</u>. See ] for further details. Violations of this restriction will lead to blocks or other sanctions (such as page or topic bans). While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the one-revert rule on the said article will very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] ] 16:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''one month''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. ] (]) 18:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
Latest revision as of 18:17, 6 December 2014
You are not learning
You will be blocked
Gregkaye ✍♪ 18:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Notification
I have reported your 1RR infringement at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.
Felino123 (talk) 18:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Wifione 02:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
General sanctions: Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. PBS (talk) 12:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Swaywoof, STOP USING THIS LOGIN!!!
PLEASE LISTEN
You will get banned for an extremely long time IF you don't play by the rules. DO NOT continue to use the login Swaywoof.
You did not listen to me before and YOU GOT BANNED.
LISTEN NOW.
WAIT! WATCH! READ! but DON'T edit.
Have some respect for others and the rules of Misplaced Pages.
Do not continue with Swaywoof or any other login or things will be bad for you.
You do not reply to others and think that you can just carry on with what you want without responding.
Gregkaye ✍♪ 20:17, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Khawarij
A content was added to the talk page as follows:
Khawarij is a word mentioned in Hadith to define Islamic Extremist in the 7th century. Narrated Yusair bin 'Amr: I asked Sahl bin Hunaif, "Did you hear the Prophet saying anything about Al-Khawarij?" He said, "I heard him saying while pointing his hand towards Iraq. "There will appear in it (i.e, Iraq) some people who will recite the Quran but it will not go beyond their throats, and they will go out from (leave) Islam as an arrow darts through the game's body.' "
This is clear example that Khawarij are Islamic extremists
I am genuinely interested. Why don't you add any points to this. Where in the Hadith?
Gregkaye ✍♪ 21:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Sock-puppet investigation
It is suspected that you have opened an account in the name of Swaywoof in order to continue pursuing your edits. This is called sock-puppeting and is serious. An investigation into this has been opened today. General information on sock-puppeting is at WP:SOCK and your case is listed here at WP:SPI. You will find your name in the list and if you click on it, it will take you to your case. For ease of reference, this is the link that will take you directly to your case here. Please note that you do have the right to defend yourself, in the part near the end under "Comments by other users". In small writing it says that you can add your comments and there is a link "Defending yourself against claims" to help you with this. ~ P123ct1 (talk) 12:39, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- You must keep to the rules, Mohammed. If you don't, you could be blocked altogether from editing in Misplaced Pages. This has happened to editors before who have not kept to the rules. Remember you can give your explanation for this new account in the section I guided you to. I would imagine your inexperience as a new editor will be taken into account. ~ P123ct1 (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Details of the second account you are suspected to have opened using the name Tipszelig have been added to the SPI investigation form here. Remember you have the right to defend yourself as explained above. ~ P123ct1 (talk) 16:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 18:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)