Revision as of 22:10, 23 November 2014 editTarc (talk | contribs)24,217 edits →ANI Notice: - ?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:20, 26 May 2024 edit undoB-bot (talk | contribs)Bots533,419 edits Notification that File:BSatPoDCover.jpg is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5 | ||
(333 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Banned user|time=indef|by=the ]|link=]}} | |||
; Archives: ], ], ], ] | |||
; Archives: ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
== Archive for the Now == | |||
... ] (]) 12:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Indefinitely banned == | ||
Further to our earlier correspondence with you, the committee has adopted the following motion: | |||
my opinions on such decisions are clear. ] (]) 11:42, 17 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
{{Ivmbox|For continued serious breaches of policy, including off-wiki harassment, {{user|Tarc}} is indefinitely banned.}} | |||
:Er, what? ] (]) 12:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
By way of enforcement I have indefinitely blocked your account. Appeal in due course must solely be by email to the committee at {{NonSpamEmail|arbcom-l|lists.wikimedia.org}}. | |||
::Relating to ArbCom topic bans from a ''single user talk page'' as being quite weird ''in esse''. Cheers. ] (]) 12:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
For the Arbitration Committee, ] ]] 22:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::A bit like getting into a fender bender, then being barred from driving down that particular street. What can ya do, it's the law of the wiki-land, for now. ] (]) 14:27, 17 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Well, speaking for myself, Tarc, I'll miss you. ~] <small>(])</small> 23:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Semiprotection? == | |||
* What? Why? Some explanation please? --] (]) 01:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
*:Doesn't sound like they are going to be forthcoming..Tarc although we do not often see eye to eye I wish you the best and a speedy return to the pedia. ] (]) 01:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Seems like the only explanation is in this discussion: ]. ~] <small>(])</small> 00:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Err, wanna semiprotect this for a bit? ] (] '''·''' ]) 13:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
* A secret resolution? --] (]) 01:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
**Dean Wormer. ] (]) 22:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
****The ban, based on secret deliberations about off-Wiki activity, announced with generalities and inadequate explanation, does not enhance the reputation of Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 04:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
*Well, this is crap. I know I'm late to the party here, but I only just found out about it. Very strange and disappointing from ArbCom, who continue to live down to my expectations. ] ] 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Yea, that'd probably be a good idea for a bit, thanks. Between the pro-Gamergate aggressors and the rapper bio I brought to AfD last night, I think the Tarc Fan Club mailbox is overflowing. ] (]) 13:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:MxPx - Chick Magnet cover.jpg== | |||
::Alright - gave it 3 months. ] (] '''·''' ]) 19:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
:::Rockin', thanks. ] (]) 20:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Notice == | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:School of Rock Poster.jpg== | |||
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. —] (]) 10:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 00:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
:Yea, unfortunately I've got a fan club that is no doubt watching for any toes out of line wrt ]. Participating in an admin noticeboard thread where I'm not primarily involved may be a grey area. ] (]) 13:25, 23 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:BSatPoDCover.jpg== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 00:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Request for mediation rejected == | |||
{{Ivmbox | |||
| The ] concerning GamerGate (controversy), to which you were listed as a party, has been ]. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the ], which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the ] of the Committee, or to the ]. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see ]. | |||
For the Mediation Committee, ] (]) 15:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)<br> | |||
<small>(Delivered by ], ] the Mediation Committee.)</small> | |||
}} | |||
== ANI notice == | |||
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.--] (]) 06:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— | |||
* ]; | |||
* ]. | |||
Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> | |||
== Notice == | |||
{{Ivmbox | |||
|'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A ] has authorised the use of ] for pages related to the ].<br>The details of these sanctions are described ]. | |||
] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged ]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. ] — ] 21:54, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Commons-emblem-notice.svg | |||
| icon size = 50px}} | |||
==Comments about others== | |||
Please stop commenting about others on the article talk page as you did , it violates the expected ] and exposes you to possible sanctions pwer ]. If you want to talk about others, take it to a noticeboard and follow ]. ] <small>]</small> 02:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Arbitration case request(Gamergate) declined == | |||
An arbitration case request(Gamergate), involving you, has been archived, because the request was declined. | |||
The made by arbitrators may be helpful in proceeding further. For the Arbitration Committee,--]] 13:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Not to bug you... == | |||
But could you point me to where that consensus was reached? I can't find it on the talk page. Thanks in advance. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Quinn's jilted ex-boyfriend made demonstrably false accusations of impropriety, so that is who we characterize his claims. ] (]) 04:37, 7 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
::I know that some (read: most if not all) of his claims were mere speculation, but how does that warrant labeling all allegations against Zoe as false? The allegations are coming from her detractors, not him. ] (]) 04:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::He made false allegations of impropriety in a blog rant, others took that ball and ran with it. ] (]) 13:33, 7 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom notification == | |||
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— | |||
* ]; | |||
* ]. | |||
Thanks,--] <sub>] ]</sub> 00:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Misclick == | |||
.—] (]) 05:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
but he's probably going to restore what he wanted to revert soon enough.—] (]) 05:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Yea, it's getting confusing at the moment, our creaky mediawiki software isn't meant to handle high-speed vandalism like his. We'll clear it up one way or another. ] (]) 05:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
I know I'm just a ], but I noticed the ] page may have some BLP issues (specifically the claim that has the word 'illegally' in it.) Not sure if this is something I should take to ] or if I'm just tilting at windmills here. — ] (]) 17:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Decided to go ahead with ] report, no point in wasting time. — ] (]) 18:20, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== WP:ARCA request (banning policy) == | |||
I have initiated a request regarding your administrative noticeboard ban at ]. ''']''' 19:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Dear talk page stalkers: short break == | |||
What is truly ironic about all the Gamergate stuff is that a few years ago, I probably would have been a natural ally of theirs. I, however, evolved, into a stance that harassing women on the internet is very much not OK, but I still love gaming itself. As such, I will be delving into ] for a few days, and time here will be spotty. ] (]) 13:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
*There are some misguided 'gamerz' that fall into the #GG category, but the vast majority of people doing the harassing of women and using Gamergate as a forum are people from the 'Men's Rights' advocacy groups. Add in some straggling ] that have glommed on, throw in 8chan/4chan/b/ trolls, and that's the 'movement' in a nutshell. Real gamers don't give a shit about the crap being pushed by those people. They know that sales drive the video game industry, and that developers are going to cater to what sells, not some ] of a game. Not that I disagree with some of the points made by the women gamers, they are correct in many of their complaints. But for Christ's sake, look at the adult film industry, and other portrayals of women in graphic imagery. Puhhh, as if game developers and the industry are all of a sudden going to stop giving people what they want. They would just lose $$money$$ to indie outlets. In other words, the whole thing is stupid beyond belief and just a reason for some sexually frustrated males to attack women for daring to not want to fuck them. ] (]) 17:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Yea, I logged into Twitter a moment ago and saw "99+" in the notifications; the neckbeards are having a field day. It's a shame for them that I'm not actually concerned with thier point of view. The only reason I became involved in the GG article in the first place was the BLP concerns regarding Quinn. ] (]) 23:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Auerbach == | |||
—] (]) 08:21, 15 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
:I think things may have been flubbed regarding how this guy was handled. Let's chalk it up as a learning experience and move on. ] (]) 14:50, 15 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
::People have told him to post things on the ArbCom page and ANI now because I called his message a threat initially. Even though I have just remembered that you are forbidden from even doing anything at ANI now.—] (]) 20:07, 15 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::{{ping|Ryulong}} ANI thing was my fault. Thought I was being friendly to him, realize it was a mistake now and I should have just pointed him to ] for advice from more experienced editors. I apologize. I suggested to him that the best way forward was for you to retract the 'threatening' comment and that you two just go your separate ways. Other then that I'm not going to inject myself into this any more. Clearly I'm over my head. Again, I really do apologize, I realize both you and Tarc have been made targets and I have a lot of appreciation for you both. — ] (]) 21:09, 15 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Gamergate Arbcom == | |||
Please note the instruction for your statement in the ] request for a case: | |||
:''Without exception, statements (including responses to other statements) must be shorter than 500 words.'' | |||
Your statement is at 717 words, so is over the limit. I see several statements are over, and I am contacting anyone who is over 500. Please recall that this statement is not intended to be a full exposition of all evidence, which occurs at the next step, but simply a statement requesting a case. Please trim back your statement. ''For the arbitration committee'' --]] 20:14, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== ANI Notice == | |||
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. --] ] 21:54, 23 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
:What on earth are you gettin on about? I've made 7 (now 8) edits all weekend, only 2 of which were Gamergate-related. Weekends is sports time for me. GO PATS! ] (]) 22:10, 23 November 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:20, 26 May 2024
Indefinitely banned
Further to our earlier correspondence with you, the committee has adopted the following motion:
For continued serious breaches of policy, including off-wiki harassment, Tarc (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned.
By way of enforcement I have indefinitely blocked your account. Appeal in due course must solely be by email to the committee at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org.
For the Arbitration Committee, AGK 22:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, speaking for myself, Tarc, I'll miss you. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- What? Why? Some explanation please? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Doesn't sound like they are going to be forthcoming..Tarc although we do not often see eye to eye I wish you the best and a speedy return to the pedia. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 01:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Seems like the only explanation is in this discussion: Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard/Archive_29#Indefinite_ban_of_Tarc. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- A secret resolution? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Dean Wormer. Collect (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- The ban, based on secret deliberations about off-Wiki activity, announced with generalities and inadequate explanation, does not enhance the reputation of Misplaced Pages. Edison (talk) 04:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Dean Wormer. Collect (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, this is crap. I know I'm late to the party here, but I only just found out about it. Very strange and disappointing from ArbCom, who continue to live down to my expectations. Reyk YO! 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:MxPx - Chick Magnet cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MxPx - Chick Magnet cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:School of Rock Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:School of Rock Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BSatPoDCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BSatPoDCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)