| Revision as of 12:23, 10 December 2014 editDbrodbeck (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,171 edits Warning: Disruptive editing on The Zeitgeist Movement. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:29, 21 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | ||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''Gain consensus on the article's talk page, to recreate said article.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> —]< |
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''Gain consensus on the article's talk page, to recreate said article.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> —]<span style="color:#FF9F00;">☆</span>] 12:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] Please stop your ], as you did at ]. Your edits have been ] or removed. | ] Please stop your ], as you did at ]. Your edits have been ] or removed. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being ]. ''Don't edit war. | Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being ]. ''Don't edit war. | ||
| ''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 12:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC) | ''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 12:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ] Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 -->--] 12:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. —]<span style="color:#FF9F00;">☆</span>] 12:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:29, 21 April 2022
December 2014
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to The Zeitgeist Movement, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.See Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Zeitgeist Movement, this article was deleted per this deletion discussion. Cannolis (talk) 11:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at The Zeitgeist Movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Gain consensus on the article's talk page, to recreate said article. —MelbourneStar☆ 12:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Zeitgeist Movement. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Don't edit war. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages. --MONGO 12:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Benjamin_au reported by User:MelbourneStar (Result: ). Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆ 12:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)