| Revision as of 01:58, 15 July 2006 editMboverload (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,898 edits →This← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:39, 5 July 2011 edit undoMechamind90 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,612 edits Use template only on user page to avoid list duplication. | ||
| (362 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{TOCright}} | |||
| #To discuss articles, please use the appropriate Discussion page of that article. | |||
| #To contact me ] | |||
| == A suggestion from a previously uninvolved admin == | |||
| Hopefully you won't ignore this. May I suggest that you keep your talk page as others have edited it but with your modifications commented out using the <nowiki> <nowiki> </nowiki> templates and then when you want to read the page, uncomment out your font and size modifiers and use the preview button. This will hopefully make everyone happy. ] 04:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Since your an admin and discussing policy (imho), there isn't any reason to ignore your message. About your suggestion, I will take it under consideration. Thanks! :) ] 04:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::You can trust Joshua implicitly. He is an excellent editor, a very fair admin and a wonderful human being. I can't think offhand of anyone I respect more on WP. Joshua is also very well-informed on religious subjects. ] 21:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::The burden involved in implementing his suggestion renders it moot in my opinion. I'm saying this only after giving it due regard. Finding enough time to deal with only this page when I want to see the other pages on Wiki like world at large sees them hasn't justification compared to using the same time to work on articles. I've begun writing a client for WP now. ] 21:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Course in Miracles == | |||
| I could not reach you by email but please do not suggest a name change to the "A Course in Miracles" article.] 19:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I'd seriously like to put the entire subject matter behind me. Until doing serious research on this topic, I hadn't ever heard of it, still haven't ever seen any of it mentioned in the media in any serious way, doubt that it has any real significance to world wide politics, religion, society, charities, wars, or anything else that is going to significantly change the planet any time soon. The fact that it does require an enormous amount of research indicates only that it is an obscure topic. That so many editors have so many different viewpoints on the matter only indicates that nobody can reach consensus and that the subject matter is ambiguous. The article along with its neighbors has caused significant amounts of abusive remarks to me for simply researching the matter which indicates that the presence of the article causes more problems than it serves to provide any information. Providing information is the primary objective of the encyclopedia. Consensus is the primary means that this encyclopedia changes it's content. And disambiguity is the primary tool for accomplishing that goal. ] 19:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Trolling == | |||
| Just because it's your talk page doesn't mean that trolling is okay. Please can the lame header changes and sarcasm. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 03:46, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Yeeah. Don't troll me, either. Consider this a warning. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 06:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| What is your point? If you don't like the way that editor signs his name then take it up with him, not me. ] 06:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| By the way, why did you remove my comment? ] 06:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I wasn't aware I removed any comment. If I did, I didn't mean to. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 06:27, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| See --] 06:41, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :You're right, looks like I did. Did you want to put it back, or do you want me to? | |||
| :Incidentally, you don't need to dupe all the comments you make here on my talk page. I have this talk page watchlisted. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 06:46, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::It doesn't matter to me if they are put back or not. The point is that I am getting mixed messages from you. When you remove my statement and replace it with "Don't troll me either", then what am I to think? And here we have just below this conversation, someone that has been stalking me for more than a week saying "don't remove comments because it's hostile". ] 06:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm sorry I sent a mixed message; I thought removing your hostile and obnoxious headers, with an edit summary that threw my own words back at me, would be message enough. And, frankly, it's right; it's a bit hostile and dismissive to remove comments. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 06:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You totally lost me. Please take some time and be more specific. I have completely stopped working on articles tonight because of this conversation. I think you will get better results if you avoid pronouns and use specific terms or use wikilinks to point out what you're specifically writing about. ] 07:02, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==False 3RR Report== | |||
| :Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages under the ], which states that nobody may ] a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the ''effect'' of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR-n --> ] 13:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ste4k? 3RR has to occur in one day. I did not edit the article yesterday in any way, thus I can not violate that rule. Also I did not revert your changes but rather addressed the macros/templates you put on the page. Please do not make false accusations, if this continues, I will report you. --] 13:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::*Base | |||
| :::*1st 1 revert | |||
| :::*2nd 3 reverts | |||
| :::*3rd 1 revert rm. "re-publish" to publish | |||
| :::*4th 1 revert | |||
| :::*5th 3 reverts | |||
| :::*6th 1 revert | |||
| :::*7th 1 revert | |||
| :::] 13:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You don't understand what a 3RR is - I was making changes and addressing your concerns. Yes, I did remove the various templates/macros, but except fro the extraneous ones, I actually addressed the issues they were warning about. Also, you mentioned that you thought I was new -- I've been editing WP since July 2005 and have racked over 3000 edits to over 1000 articles. Also you should check the WP:V section I quote on the ] page -- it is relevant and you should really read it. --] 13:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I'm sorry but the July date in your contribs averted attention from the year since it is the current month. Please accept my apologies for thinking you were a new editor. ] 14:02, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Red Links== | |||
| I notice you don't like red links. They are not actually that bad since they suggest to readers where they could contribute new articles. Also there are global links of articles that don't exist that have the most links -- these are useful in helping guide people's new article creation efforts. --] 16:16, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :"don't like red links"? Could you explain your premise, please? ] 01:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is a formal notice and warning. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in other sections of this page or elsewhere. No further edits should be made to this section.'' | |||
| == Notice and Warning to Nscheffey == | |||
| Your merge is wrong. If you want to talk about it here or on the articles talk page thats fine, but dont just revert it. --] 20:44, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * Neither do I own any "''merge''", nor is a "''merge''" an unjust or injurious act, something contrary to ethics or morality, an invasion or a violation of another's legal rights, nor an injustice. Neither have you your own . You have already established that is to stalk me personally rather than have any concern over any article I edit. Consider this message formal warning that further attempts to communicate with me before addressing prior concerns about will be considered harassment. ] 00:15, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **Attempting to contact you concerning a major edit is not stalking, and your allegations are outrageous. --] 00:43, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***If you have a dispute then follow correct procedure. Your statement above signifies that you have read and understood my complaint. Until such a time as you have addressed those concerns formally, all further communication to me from you is considered harassment. ] 01:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == This == | |||
| This is considered extremely hostile. Why are you so hostile to everything? --]] 01:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Could you be more specific? ] 01:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Using the style of closed AfD/RfA discussions just because you don't want to talk to someone? That's a pretty hostile action, maybe you don't even realize the social implications of your behavior, but it does have implications on how people view you. --]] 01:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Headings == | |||
| Hi and thanks for your clean up work. Note that per the ] one should use lowercase in section headings except the first letter and in proper names. So, | |||
| ==Further reading== | |||
| instead of | |||
| ==Further Reading== | |||
| Also, articles should be named ] rather than ]. | |||
| Small things but I thought I would let you know. You can reply here if you have comments. Thanks. ] (]) 23:24, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:39, 5 July 2011
Redirect to: