| Revision as of 06:37, 22 December 2014 editYMB29 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,352 edits new section | Latest revision as of 03:00, 14 February 2015 edit undoMiGR25 (talk | contribs)27 edits →MiGR25, you are invited to the Teahouse! | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{retired|date=February 2015}} | |||
| == Edit warring == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | |||
| You can't revert text from a reliable source (here ), because you don't like it.<br> | |||
| You have to discuss using the talk page. -] (]) 06:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | |||