| Revision as of 17:22, 30 December 2014 edit200.83.101.225 (talk) Undid revision 640262404 by SchroCat (talk)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:05, 1 January 2024 edit undoBD2412 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators2,455,131 editsm blank ancient IP talk page messagesTags: AWB Replaced | ||
| (172 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| ==Welcome back== | |||
| Hi, I'm glad you came back. And I'll ping {{U|Drmies}} again. Once more, I'm sorry for using the word "vandal". However, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for apologies from others if I were you, and please keep it dialled all the way down in the aspersions casting - and if possible ping me or Drmies when the reverting starts rather than carrying it so far. Or come to my talk page and kick me there. (For one thing one of us may be able to think of a different wording to fix the article.) ] (]) 16:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I'll be in touch if I run into problems and will endeavour to drop you a line before they really become problems. No worries about the v-word. I was upset that you described me as having been known by it, because it a) wasn't true, and b) could very easily encourage those who believe I was, or am, any such thing. | |||
| :Wasn't holding my breath but I was very pleased to see one apology actually given. It's perpetually disappointing that people are free to slander me in as base a way as they please, and there is barely an iota of community pressure for them to ever admit that they were wrong. ] (]) 21:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Problems...== | |||
| ] and ], if you have the time, I would appreciate your thoughts on my recent edits to ]. My carefully explained edits are being undone with unhelpful claims like "not an improvement", with no attempt being made by the reverters to justify their actions. Also, there is an absurd situation at ] in which people wish to mention a speech without explaining what it contained or why it might be important. Thank you very much. ] (]) 14:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :As you see, I have waded in, and now edited, at ]. On the James Bond article, there are several different parts to your edit(s) and I'm having difficulty getting it all straight, so I haven't yet waded in there. I think it's going to have to be broken down into elements to be usefully discussed and worked on. ] (]) 16:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Also did some further editing following your work at Paul Keating, hope you don't mind. Thanks. ] (]) 16:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. —]<font color="#FF9F00">☆</font>] 14:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Attacks == | |||
| ] and ], I would appreciate it if you could give your opinion on ]. They are posting absurdly contradictory arguments on several talk page discussions, seemingly with the intention of fatally disrupting any discussion, and now they are stalking my edits and acting disruptively, removing a prod tag on an article that they certainly have no interest in. They removed a post of mine on their talk page, only to immediately post a provocative message here. I regard their behaviour as problematic and disruptive. I'd appreciate your thoughts on the matter. ] (]) 17:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:05, 1 January 2024
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.