Misplaced Pages

:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:52, 3 January 2015 view sourceArmbrust (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers326,175 editsm fix indent← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:40, 11 January 2025 view source Dclemens1971 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers15,744 edits →User:SiniyaEdita: ReplyTag: Reply 
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{Requests for permissions}}{{noadminbacklog}}<!--If the page has a backlog, then change this to {{adminbacklog}} and vice-versa.--></noinclude> <noinclude>{{Short description|Place to request autopatrolled rights}}{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{WP:PERM/Nav}}{{WP:PERM/Backlog|none}}<!-- do not remove, managed by bot --></noinclude>
==={{anchor|rperm-autopatrolled}}Autopatrolled=== ===Autopatrolled<span id="rperm-autopatrolled"></span>===
{{WP:PERM/Subpage|shortcut=A|subpage=Autopatrolled|notice=<noinclude>
:;(<span class="plainlinks"> &#8226; ]</span>)
Please read ''']''' before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants will not be granted this right if they have not created ''at least'' '''{{Misplaced Pages:Autopatrolled/Article count}} new articles''' on the English Misplaced Pages, excluding ] and ]. These articles should be free of problems requiring the attention of patrollers. Note that this right '''will not help you create or patrol articles'''.</noinclude>}}
<noinclude>{{TOCright}}{{shortcuts|WP:PERM/A|WP:RFP/A|WP:PERMS/A}}</noinclude>
<!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.--> <!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks. -->
⚫ ====]====
⚫ * {{rfplinks|1=Lopifalko}}
:I have created 31 articles, mostly BLP about photographers, containing ample demonstration of notability and verifiability in their first draft to pass scrutiny. I am conversant with policy on copyright and on making claims with regard BLP. ] (]) 08:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
::In general, I would have suggested the creation of a minimum of 50 articles. In your case, I've found the articles to be impressively referenced and judiciously maintained. If you're not in a hurry, I wouldn't mind adding this bit to your profile if you reach at least 40 articles, just to ensure there are no ruffled feathers. At the same time, if you insist, I can add this ] (although I would prefer the 40 benchmark). Your call. ] ] 16:27, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
::: Thanks for your consideration Wifione, and for being so complimentary. I'll wait until I reach 40 and come back to this. -] (])
:::: {{not done}}. The ''not done'' is just procedural. {{u|Lopifalko}}, refer to this request when you request this bit again in the future. Thanks for your contributions. ] ] 14:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC)


====]==== ====]====
* {{rfplinks|1=Erutuon}} *{{rfplinks|1=Aidillia}}
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights
:I've created 62 non-redirect articles and 146 redirects, primarily on topics relating to linguistics and botany. My record in following policy regarding notability has been good, and according to X!'s list, all but three of the articles I created remain (and the only one that actually seems to have stayed deleted is a duplicate). I'm not creating articles at as high a rate as I used to, but at least my track record should qualify me for autopatrolled. — ]·] 01:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)


Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created ]! :) <span style="font-family:Cursive">]<sup>(])</sup></span> 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
⚫ ====]====
⚫ * {{rfplinks|1=Giso6150}}
:The quality of my 45 articles (and my hundreds of other edits and contributions) has been consistently good and continues to improve. The type of projects that I most enjoy—creating stub articles for notable topics related to São Paulo—often yields a small flood of new articles in a short period of time. Still, only my very first article (in 2012) was ever disputed… I really do have a knack for this! I believe that I’ve demonstrated that I understand the importance of using categories, templates, references, and proper formatting in the articles that I create. Autopatrolling my humble stubs would help free up time for others to devote to trickier, messier pages. ] (]) 03:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
::{{notdone}}. Good work but almost all one-line stubs that do not demonstrate a broad knowledge of notability or MoS. Of the three or four full length articles one BLP is borderline notable. It won't take the patrollers long to review your articles so do apply again when you have reached nearer the default 50 full articles that would not attract the attention of the reviewers. --] (]) 07:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


:{{non-admin comment}} In '']'', there's a bit of mess with the history, seeing that it was ] but later ] and then expanded, this time, with copyright violations which remained not until ] fixed and ]. Checking through some other creations revealed some issues like grammar errors. Things like these are what the NPP is for, and English Misplaced Pages is not ready to keep copyvios on the site, not ever.
⚫ ====]====
:It also appears to be that ] had copyvio issues, which GLL fixed too. ] (]) 11:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
⚫ * {{rfplinks|1=Pdfpdf}}
::Well, I don't know if translating from a website is forbidden, because a few months ago, there was someone who reverted my edit because of no reliable sources for the description I wrote myself. So after that, what was included in the sources I used. Many people I see do that. And now I know I'm trying to remove it as much as possible and do some fixing. <span style="font-family:Cursive">]<sup>(])</sup></span> 11:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:Per ], <small>(viz: ''Having just patrolled a few of your new pages I'm struck by how dumb it is to be checking the contribution of someone with 3 times my experience. Please apply for ] and save us from pointless work. Happy New Year. ] (]) 12:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)''),</small> I would feel very guilty if I did not apply. Cheers, ] (]) 18:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
: {{Not done}}. Thanks for your interest in the permission, but the copyvio occurred last week and is a serious concern. I don't quite follow your explanation for it, so I'm not able to look past the concerns. ] 21:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

⚫ ====]====
⚫ *{{rfplinks|1=Pseud 14}}
Meets the minimum criteria, and the majority of their creations have passed a quality content review. It's been a little bit since the last creation, but I believe this editor has demonstrated enough familiarity with the policies and guidelines surrounding new articles that input from NPP will not be needed in the future. <span class="nowrap">—]</span> <small>(])</small> 22:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{done}} ] (]) 19:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Cmacauley}}
Cmacauley has been an editor since 2007, meets all the required criteria, and would likely benefit from having the AP right granted. This editor currently has 59 live articles and has only had one article deleted. They have consistently produced well-referenced, high-quality articles, with the majority receiving B-class ratings. ] (]) 05:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{Done}}. One adverse consideration was ] for violation of copyright. I'm prepared to look past it: the warning was issued in 2019 and nothing recurred while the user has been highly active since then. ] 21:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

⚫ ====]====
⚫ *{{rfplinks|1=Anon423}}
I've been around for some time, am quite familiar with tough conversations at the Teahouse or IRC (though I've sadly been inactive at the latter for a while) with new editors excitedly pushing their (often promotional) new articles, and do occasionally write new articles, 53 so far. I might as well not clutter the new pages queue. —&hairsp;] (]) 01:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
: {{done}} ] 21:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=SiniyaEdita}}
Has created 166 articles, with all of them created over the last year or so are still live. As part of NPP, I reviewed ] and found that SiniyaEdita had created the page without the intervention from others, and I didn't think that it needed further improvement. Other articles they created are of a similar standard. ] (]) 17:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

:I came here to echo this request. I've reviewed several of SiniyaEdita's articles and they are all of a high standard. They also expand our quality coverage of Africa. Worth noting, the user's prior account (]) had autopatrolled status. ] (]) 03:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

⚫ ====]====
⚫ *{{rfplinks|1=Ojsyork}}
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. ] (]) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:40, 11 January 2025

Place to request autopatrolled rights
Requests for permissions
Common
Uncommon
Logs
Special

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts Please read Misplaced Pages:Autopatrolled before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants will not be granted this right if they have not created at least 25 new articles on the English Misplaced Pages, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. These articles should be free of problems requiring the attention of patrollers. Note that this right will not help you create or patrol articles.

User:Aidillia

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights

Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created here! :) Aidillia 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) In Buried Hearts, there's a bit of mess with the history, seeing that it was first deleted but later recreated and then expanded, this time, with copyright violations which remained not until GreenLipstickLesbian fixed and requested a revision deletion today. Checking through some other creations revealed some issues like grammar errors. Things like these are what the NPP is for, and English Misplaced Pages is not ready to keep copyvios on the site, not ever.
It also appears to be that Labor Attorney Noh Moo-jin had copyvio issues, which GLL fixed too. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Well, I don't know if translating from a website is forbidden, because a few months ago, there was someone who reverted my edit because of no reliable sources for the description I wrote myself. So after that, what was included in the sources I used. Many people I see do that. And now I know I'm trying to remove it as much as possible and do some fixing. Aidillia 11:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
 Not done. Thanks for your interest in the permission, but the copyvio occurred last week and is a serious concern. I don't quite follow your explanation for it, so I'm not able to look past the concerns. arcticocean ■ 21:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Pseud 14

Meets the minimum criteria, and the majority of their creations have passed a quality content review. It's been a little bit since the last creation, but I believe this editor has demonstrated enough familiarity with the policies and guidelines surrounding new articles that input from NPP will not be needed in the future. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Cmacauley

Cmacauley has been an editor since 2007, meets all the required criteria, and would likely benefit from having the AP right granted. This editor currently has 59 live articles and has only had one article deleted. They have consistently produced well-referenced, high-quality articles, with the majority receiving B-class ratings. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done. One adverse consideration was this warning for violation of copyright. I'm prepared to look past it: the warning was issued in 2019 and nothing recurred while the user has been highly active since then. arcticocean ■ 21:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Anon423

I've been around for some time, am quite familiar with tough conversations at the Teahouse or IRC (though I've sadly been inactive at the latter for a while) with new editors excitedly pushing their (often promotional) new articles, and do occasionally write new articles, 53 so far. I might as well not clutter the new pages queue. — Anon423 (talk) 01:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done arcticocean ■ 21:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User:SiniyaEdita

Has created 166 articles, with all of them created over the last year or so are still live. As part of NPP, I reviewed Titus Joseph Mdoe and found that SiniyaEdita had created the page without the intervention from others, and I didn't think that it needed further improvement. Other articles they created are of a similar standard. Klbrain (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I came here to echo this request. I've reviewed several of SiniyaEdita's articles and they are all of a high standard. They also expand our quality coverage of Africa. Worth noting, the user's prior account (Fsmatovu) had autopatrolled status. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ojsyork

I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)