| Revision as of 21:41, 9 January 2015 editWinkelvi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,145 edits done with this for now; my response was clear: not commenting further until I get some advice from editors i trust; stop posting here, please← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:53, 2 September 2022 edit undoGidonb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users95,919 edits object | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | == Note == | ||
| {{Rollback topicon | |||
| |icon_nr=1}} | |||
| {{reviewer topicon | |||
| |icon_nr=2}} | |||
| {{CVU topicon|status=member|icon_nr=3}} | |||
| {{Twinkle topicon | icon_nr =4}} | |||
| <br/> | |||
| {{talkheader}} | |||
| <br/> | |||
| <br/> | |||
| <center>{{User:UBX/Aspergers}} | |||
| If you've had any kind of issue or misunderstanding in your dealings with me, there is an excellent article/essay on Misplaced Pages editors with Asperger Syndrome found ] that might help. | |||
| <br> | |||
| <br> | |||
| </center> | |||
| Thanks for stopping by! | |||
| Not that it will make much difference in your day-to-day, but I've retired the "anti-filibuster" sanction that I placed on you in August 2018, so that no longer applies. The other sanctions are set to expire soon. {{pb}}Unrelated, but I remember in the previous site-ban discussion MONGO proposed some sort of reverse topic ban where you'd limit yourself to editing only 5 articles. That might be a starting point for an unblock...getting those articles to GA with no drama could be used as evidence to appeal for a less restrictive ban. I dunno...maybe it's a bad idea, but it's a start. <span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~] <small>(])</small></span> 19:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Here in Misplaced Pages, I go by "Winkelvi". I enjoy patrolling the ] page, looking for vandalism by IP addresses. As a ], I'm also often reviewing and then either accepting or rejecting pending changes. While I try to be accurate with the reverts I make and the subsequent warnings I leave on talk pages, I am only human and will make mistakes from time to time. '''If you're here because of an editing issue or a revert I've made to one or more of your edits and you feel I've made an error, please leave me a '']'' message on my ]''' If you want to talk about article edits, it's really best to do so at the article's talk page. If you do so, and your comments regard changes I've made there, please ping me. | |||
| == Unblock request closed == | |||
| When you leave a message on my talk page and a response from me is appropriate, I will reply to you here, not on your talk page. Having half a conversation on a talk page and going back and forth between pages is unnecessarily confusing and a pain in the ass. | |||
| You have likely seen this already, but I should probably notify you that I have your unblock request as unsuccessful. Please read the comments there carefully before any subsequent requests. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] (])</span> 19:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| <br> | |||
| <br> | |||
| == Sockpuppet investigation == | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 31 December 2014 == | |||
| You have been mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Winkelvi&redirect=no ] (]) 22:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-12-31}} | |||
| </div><!--Volume 10, Issue -1--> | |||
| <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] (]) 22:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| </div></div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=640656404 --> | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Trump Baby Balloon at protest in Parliament Square.jpg== | |||
| == Difference between categories, sections, and headings == | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 10:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| were initially confusing. A ] begins with a ]. A subsection begins with a subheading, but calling it a heading will be fully understood. ] are used to help organize the vast collection of articles in Misplaced Pages and are something else entirely, but ''are'' hierarchical, so there is such a thing as a subcategory, but it has very little to do with the content of an article. I usually expect edit summaries that mention "categories" to be for edits that add/remove/change one or more <nowiki>]</nowiki> links on the page. This is intended as friendly advice to help with future editing; please don't take it wrongly if I've worded it poorly. I'm trying to keep the overall amount of confusion around the ] article to a minimum. (I'll watch this page for a while for a reply.) ] (]) 23:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == If you are watching this page == | |||
| :Edit summaries are never perfect, they often are confusing - that's why we have diffs to look at what actually happened. I never go solely on an edit summary. That's said, I'll try to be more precise in the areas you've pointed out, but honestly, I'm not going to take great pains to get an edit summary perfect. I figure that as long as someone isn't using an edit summary for the wrong reasons and is at least using the edit summary to begoin with, perfection in edit summary nomenclature is at the bottom of the priority list. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 23:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Winkelvi - I think you should respond to the accusations of socking, especially if you are innocent. If you don't defend yourself, it will be assumed that you are guilty which makes it doubtful the community will allow you to return...provided you even want to return. j/s ] <sub>]</sub> | |||
| ::That's fine. Several of my edit summaries have various errors, including where I fixed a typo in the article and made a new typo in the edit summary. It's not like Misplaced Pages has a ] or anything. <big style="font-size: 150%">☺</big> ] (]) 00:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ] 15:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| : Even being completely truthful and saying it's not me, I'm pretty sure nothing I do at this point will mean squat. I recall being called a liar here numerous times, by regular editors and admins, when I wasn't lying, but being totally honest. I'm not wanted in Misplaced Pages, that's been plain since even before my indef, in addition to the subsequent denial of request to return, and now being "tried" and tagged as a sockmaster solely on circumstantial "behavioral" evidence by a relatively new editor and admin/CU with whom I've never interacted when I was editing. How anyone can believe they are knowledgeable of someone's behavior without ever experiencing that person's behavior is beyond my understanding and logic, but the result is what it is. Misplaced Pages as a mostly anonymous community has shown me it is unforgiving and the normal rules of the real world don't apply. Based on all that, I think trying to defend myself, drawing up a case, and being hopeful for a return to editing would be a complete waste of everyone's time and end only in disappointment for me. | |||
| :One more thing, ]: Recognizing that I cleaned up a totally screwed up article would have been a better thing, a nicer thing to come here with before pointing out that you think I made your editing there more difficult. Again, priorities. No matter if I didn't produce edit summaries up to your standards, the article is in much better shape now than it was 24 hours ago because I took the time and effort to get it that way. In my opinion, there's a plethora of negative criticism in Misplaced Pages when there should be a plethora of thanks given to the volunteer editors who make te 'pedia a better online resource. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | I do thank you for caring, though. '''<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span>''' ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 16:41, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| ::No, you didn't make my editing more difficult and thanks for cleaning up the article. I had thought that thanks for your contributions went without saying. I intended for this to be entirely constructive criticism and advice for the future, on an assumption that you may have been unaware of that distinction. I apologize if I have caused offense. ] (]) 00:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I am so sorry you left. You were my friend :( ] <span style="color:Purple">(2020)</span> ] 18:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Good thing that got cleared up. Some folks see the boogeyman under the bed, in the closet, behind the couch.--] (]) 00:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::Only minimally offensive, and not enough for me to want to you think that I'm unhappy with your commets here, ]. I think you hit me at a bad moment when I was contemplating how I've never seen another organzation depending on volunteer workers that is in general less appreciative of those volunteers on a day-to-day, and sometimes moment-to-moment basis. So, all that in mind, please don't take my comments personal or to mean that I'm not interested in working with you cooperatively. Like I said: your message came at a bad moment. Thanks, and Happy New Year. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Winkelvi was mean to me during the sockpuppet investigation that got me blocked 4 years ago. ] <span style="color:Purple">(2020)</span> ] 21:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| 😂 ] (]) 11:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| For the record, I object to ''any'' unblocking of this user! ] (]) 21:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| As I was with your comments on my talk page, which frankly indicated that you hadn't been reading what I wrote in that very discussion (or whats was in the article) very carefully, I'm frankly perplexed by your edits to the captioned article. In a series of unconstructive edits, you removed significant text concerning the significance of Myerson winning the 1945 pageant. You edit-warred to keep those edits. Have you read the source materials that are the basis of those edits? I am asking in good faith as I really don't believe you have. Also you appear to not be familiar with the kind of material that appears in biographies of living persons. Information on siblings, including deceased ones and especially ones claimed in an untimely fashion, is routinely included. ] (]) 19:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thank you so much== | |||
| You are very kind. --]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' ] '''</span> 20:44, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :So are you, ]. Keep moving forward, keep contributing, and try not to look back at bad editor behavior. It will eat you up if you do. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 20:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::DONE - thanks again! --]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' ] '''</span> 20:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| That was an accidental rollback from my watchlist. I've requested rollback removal so I don't misclick again.] (]) 17:53, 9 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the explanation. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 17:57, 9 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 07 January 2015 == | |||
| <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2015-01-07}} | |||
| </div><!--Volume 11, Issue 0--> | |||
| <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] (]) 20:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| </div></div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=641384801 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 21:53, 2 September 2022
Note
Not that it will make much difference in your day-to-day, but I've retired the "anti-filibuster" sanction that I placed on you in August 2018, so that no longer applies. The other sanctions are set to expire soon.
Unrelated, but I remember in the previous site-ban discussion MONGO proposed some sort of reverse topic ban where you'd limit yourself to editing only 5 articles. That might be a starting point for an unblock...getting those articles to GA with no drama could be used as evidence to appeal for a less restrictive ban. I dunno...maybe it's a bad idea, but it's a start. ~Awilley (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Unblock request closed
You have likely seen this already, but I should probably notify you that I have closed your unblock request as unsuccessful. Please read the comments there carefully before any subsequent requests. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
You have been mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Winkelvi&redirect=no Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Trump Baby Balloon at protest in Parliament Square.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Trump Baby Balloon at protest in Parliament Square.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 182.239.120.76 (talk) 10:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
If you are watching this page
Winkelvi - I think you should respond to the accusations of socking, especially if you are innocent. If you don't defend yourself, it will be assumed that you are guilty which makes it doubtful the community will allow you to return...provided you even want to return. j/s Talk 📧 15:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
: Even being completely truthful and saying it's not me, I'm pretty sure nothing I do at this point will mean squat. I recall being called a liar here numerous times, by regular editors and admins, when I wasn't lying, but being totally honest. I'm not wanted in Misplaced Pages, that's been plain since even before my indef, in addition to the subsequent denial of request to return, and now being "tried" and tagged as a sockmaster solely on circumstantial "behavioral" evidence by a relatively new editor and admin/CU with whom I've never interacted when I was editing. How anyone can believe they are knowledgeable of someone's behavior without ever experiencing that person's behavior is beyond my understanding and logic, but the result is what it is. Misplaced Pages as a mostly anonymous community has shown me it is unforgiving and the normal rules of the real world don't apply. Based on all that, I think trying to defend myself, drawing up a case, and being hopeful for a return to editing would be a complete waste of everyone's time and end only in disappointment for me.
I do thank you for caring, though. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 16:41, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- I am so sorry you left. You were my friend :( cookie monster (2020) 755 18:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Good thing that got cleared up. Some folks see the boogeyman under the bed, in the closet, behind the couch.--MONGO (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Winkelvi was mean to me during the sockpuppet investigation that got me blocked 4 years ago. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
😂 Second Skin (talk) 11:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
For the record, I object to any unblocking of this user! gidonb (talk) 21:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)