| Revision as of 02:25, 18 January 2015 editCindy's Cafe (talk | contribs)186 edits ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:22, 3 October 2017 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,764 editsm 1 dispenser.homenet.org URL deleted due to domain hijacking by squatters (discussion) | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == January 2015 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''You seem to be deeply involved in a revert war regarding Karren Brady. Please find somewhere to discuss these issues, rather than continuing to revert.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 06:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == February 2015 == | |||
| ] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ] (]) 23:39, 22 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == February 2015 == | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 03:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Edit warring== | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for edit warring, as described at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents , in the section "User:Cindy's Cafe aka 109.246.133.205". The block has been applied both to your account (Cindy's Cafe) and to an IP address which you have recently used in the edit war (109.246.133.205). However, to avoid any possible misunderstanding, as long as the block is in place, you do not have permission to edit Misplaced Pages at all; that includes editing via any other IP address (such as 109.246.133.66, which you have used in the past). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 11:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
| == Block evasion == | |||
| When your account and an IP address that you had been using for ] were blocked recently, I took the trouble to explain to you that while the blocks were in place you did not have permission to edit Misplaced Pages at all, and that evading the block by using another IP address was unacceptable. The reason I spent the time and trouble it took to explain that was to help you avoid the risk of making the innocent mistake of thinking that using another IP address to edit was OK, and thereby getting blocked again. However, despite my efforts, you have evaded the block. For the moment, I have just reset the block to its original length of 1 week, but if you evade the block again it is very likely that you may be blocked for much longer. If necessary, it will be possible to edit-protect all the pages you have edited, but that will inconvenience legitimate editors as well as you, so I hope you will not make that necessary. Also, every edit that you made while evading the blocks that has not already been superceded by edits by other editors will be reverted. You have been told on the talk page of your account how to request an unblock, and "just ignore the block and keep on editing by using IP addresses that are not blocked" is not how to do it. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 16:06, 1 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == EastEnders Manual of Style == | |||
| Please read this: ], which provides a record of the consensus of those who edit EastEnders (and other soap opera) articles. ] ] 07:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == September 2015 == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of ] to ] because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] ] 07:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for March 14== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ], ] and ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] ] 12:18, 14 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| For edit warring, and using an IP to edit-war alongside your account, I have blocked you indefinitely. This is a block of indeterminate time, not permanently, but you need to show some understanding of, and willingness to abide by, the ] and ] rules. Appeal instructions are in that previous block template up there. ] (]) 00:23, 12 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Cindy's Cafe. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/50&oldid=750795303 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:22, 3 October 2017
January 2015
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You seem to be deeply involved in a revert war regarding Karren Brady. Please find somewhere to discuss these issues, rather than continuing to revert. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 06:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Dot Cotton, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 03:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Block evasion
When your account and an IP address that you had been using for edit warring were blocked recently, I took the trouble to explain to you that while the blocks were in place you did not have permission to edit Misplaced Pages at all, and that evading the block by using another IP address was unacceptable. The reason I spent the time and trouble it took to explain that was to help you avoid the risk of making the innocent mistake of thinking that using another IP address to edit was OK, and thereby getting blocked again. However, despite my efforts, you have evaded the block. For the moment, I have just reset the block to its original length of 1 week, but if you evade the block again it is very likely that you may be blocked for much longer. If necessary, it will be possible to edit-protect all the pages you have edited, but that will inconvenience legitimate editors as well as you, so I hope you will not make that necessary. Also, every edit that you made while evading the blocks that has not already been superceded by edits by other editors will be reverted. You have been told on the talk page of your account how to request an unblock, and "just ignore the block and keep on editing by using IP addresses that are not blocked" is not how to do it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:06, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
EastEnders Manual of Style
Please read this: Manual of Style, which provides a record of the consensus of those who edit EastEnders (and other soap opera) articles. Stephenb (Talk) 07:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
Hello, I'm Stephenb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to John McDonnell (politician) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Stephenb (Talk) 07:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Next Labour Party (UK) leadership election, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tom Watson, John McDonnell and Owen Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Next Labour Party (UK) leadership election for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Labour Party (UK) leadership election is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Next Labour Party (UK) leadership election until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stephenb (Talk) 12:18, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Blocked
For edit warring, and using an IP to edit-war alongside your account, I have blocked you indefinitely. This is a block of indeterminate time, not permanently, but you need to show some understanding of, and willingness to abide by, the edit warring and sockpuppetry rules. Appeal instructions are in that previous block template up there. Courcelles (talk) 00:23, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Cindy's Cafe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)