| Revision as of 21:10, 19 January 2015 editFreeRangeFrog (talk | contribs)34,528 edits →Heather Bresch: re:← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:02, 28 December 2024 edit undoMinorax (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers192,246 edits Notification: tagging for deletion of File:Institute of Culinary Education Logo.jpg.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|may have left Misplaced Pages|FreeRangeFrog|26 August 2015}} | |||
| {{mbox | {{mbox | ||
| | image = ] | | image = ] | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
| <!-- | <!-- | ||
| {{Holiday|from= |
{{Holiday|from=July 03|until=July 06}} | ||
| --> | --> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
| <br /> | <br /> | ||
| {{Nobots}} | |||
| ==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| == FYI, Seph == | |||
| ] | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Hope you are OK == | |||
| This was posted yesterday --<font color="#666666">‖ ] <sup>]</sup> - <small>]</font> ‖ 19:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Ebyabe}} Thanks for the heads up. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 19:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Frog. It's been a long time since anyone here has heard from you and you are missed. The very abrupt nature of your apparent departure has some people worried. Could you drop a line here, or even a private email to someone on Misplaced Pages just to let us know you are OK? Best regards... -] (]) 02:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Adding properly referenced information to ] == | |||
| Hi from me too. Yes, what happened to you? I hope you are okay. We miss you. ] (]) 00:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Hi FreeRangeFrog, can you help me edit ] so that it contains appropriately worded and sourced information? | |||
| I tried to add some, but it was removed very quickly. I'd prefer to edit it to improve it, but I don't want to fall afoul of the 3 revert rule.] (]) 19:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| I've pasted the content and references that were removed at ] so people can help me edit it. ] (]) 19:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| :No, I cannot. Forgetting for a second that it was sourced to facebook and blogs (which are never ]), the material was written inappropriately, lacking ] and attempting to synthesize information to make the point that the subject's divorce is bad for whatever reason. You'll need a reliable source that ''specifically'' talks about the subject and his divorce and places it ''exactly'' in that negative light. Otherwise it's all just ]. But ultimately the onus is on you to structure, word and source the information correctly. Per the ] policy, such material is removed on sight, and without discussion. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 19:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| | title = Precious | |||
| | image = Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg | |||
| :: I've left that material alone. I have attempted to describe some of the discussion of emergent theology in neutral pov terms. What do you think? ] (]) 19:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| | image_upright = 0.4 | |||
| :::Blogs and more blogs. Again, you need to find reliable sources. If you don't have those then it's not gonna happen. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 19:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| :::: What's a reliable source? You really could try to be more helpful rather than reverting everything I do. ] (]) 19:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| :::::], ]. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 19:37, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| --] (]) 08:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::::And I will note that a lot of that article is actually uses unreliable (or primary) sources, however none of that information is negative, which is the "trigger" for removal. So I placed some tags at the top. The article is protected for a week - that should give you time to find your sources. I forgot to mention, if you require a second opinion you can go ] and ask for advice. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 19:39, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: Um, don't bite the newcomers, please? I don't feel very encouraged to come back after a week. ] (]) 19:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Definitely, unless the newcomers insist on edit warring on a biography and are unwilling to understand the policies they are pointed at. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 19:53, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::I understand now, but the policy was incredibly long and quite unclear. It was really helpful when you said "blogs are not reliable", even if you were understandably annoyed at the time. ] (]) 20:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::If I'd been told that in the first revert, I wouldn't have wasted your and my time on blogs, and would have spent effort finding other sources. ] (]) 20:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| I think I've come up with a factual statement based on reliable sources (court documents). I'd like to get consensus before proposing an edit. What do you think of the edit at the end of ] <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Ok, let's try again: Per ], I'd like to use the blog posts on the talk page, and perhaps other posts of Tony's, for information about himself. How do you feel about this? ] (]) 20:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :The article already has enough primary sources... can you find some secondary ones? That would be best. The idea is to improve the article, not make it more worse :) Also, please be mindful about how you use and word those sources. Arriving at conclusions about the subject based on what the subject writes is ]. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 22:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Ribbit. It appears that an IP-hopper who is repeatedly copying and pasting my post to ] (and misconstruing it as an illustration of how Misplaced Pages is such a terribly corrupt place) is now trying to ] by spamming every possible admin in order to claim that they are ]. I am guessing that the IPs are sockpuppets for a banned user, but I don't know who. The IP is apparently now trying to put every admin on report to the stewards. Maybe the stewards can globally block the IPs. Ribbit. ] (]) 22:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Robert McClenon}} Thanks for the heads up. Are they doing this somewhere else? So far three IPs blocked but those are not range-friendly. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 01:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::There is an entirely different and even crazier IP who has just posted to ] with a ] that ] is the real master of the ] via Misplaced Pages. I don't think that those IPs are in any way related. User CombatWombat42 advised me of the post to ] as impersonation. It wasn't regular impersonation, since they were only copying and pasting my signature to what had been my post. I haven't seen any further evidence of the IP that you blocked since you blocked it. As I said, I think that the IPs that you blocked (and another admin also blocked) are sockpuppets for a banned user ranting about how bad Misplaced Pages is. The most recent post is entirely different. ] (]) 03:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::The post has been deleted, and ] has been requested. ] (]) 03:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Redaction performed. Yet another user at WP:ANI complained about abuse by Binksternet, who is an ancient enemy, and said that he would obtain a restraining order, but then deleted that phrase in response to the ] warning. Multiple weird stuff, but the really crazy post is gone, and I haven't seen any more abuse by the IP-hopper whom you blocked. Thank you for blocking. ] (]) 03:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Restoring a fact that got dropped from ] earlier today == | |||
| Please see my suggested edit at ] <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I am re-creating this article because she has now the award for Foreign Female Perfomer of the Year at the 2015 ]s. '''<span style="color:red;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">]</span></sup></small> 15:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Okeydokey. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 16:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Re:Speedy deletion declined: ] == | |||
| Hi, this article is a hoax, especially by ] did not participate in any series with that title. Nor had 3 seasons, . ] nor participated in this series. I recommend you to investigate well. The user who I believe that article is an obvious puppet of ]. Who has also created this another article that is also false .--<span style="background:#000000;border:2px solid #000000">''']'''</span> / ''']''' 21:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|McVeigh}} Thanks for the heads up. There's a difference between a hoax topic and misleading information in an article. They are not interchangeable. If "Terminales" the telenovela exists then the article cannot be considered a hoax. Hoaxes don't apply to content, because the deletion is performed on the article rather than the content. Not sure if that makes sense. The Acapulco one on the other hand is definitely a hoax. Ultimately though, you're very likely right that this is a sock of Talker36912, so I've deleted the articles as G5 instead. Cheers! <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 23:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK I understand, thank you for your help.--<span style="background:#000000;border:2px solid #000000">''']'''</span> / ''']''' 00:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Eliminating the Michael Parker edits from the Satin article == | |||
| Dear FreeRangeFrog, - Thank you again for offering to eliminate all of Michael W. Parker's edits from the ] FA. I have now reviewed all 23 of them and must conclude that it would be good - no, great - if you did so. | |||
| Because I do not want to be seen as "owning" the Satin article, I feel I should share with you my reasons for wanting each of the edits reverted: | |||
| XX.) Please note that on Jan. 15 at 21:58, NeilN properly restored the Ben Franklin picture and caption. (Parker had been so incensed that draft evader Satin made use of a patriot like Franklin in his ''Radical Middle'' book, that he eliminated the image and caption.) | |||
| 1 - 10.) Ten edits stretching from 21:11 on Jan. 9 through 9:22 on Jan. 14. These all consist of Parker's attempts to alter the Assessment section to reflect his antagonism toward Satin's draft evasion. By now they have all been reverted (by four different editors). | |||
| Edits #11 - 23 were all created on Jan. 14. They should all be eliminated except the last (which I can restore if eliminating them all would be easier for you). | |||
| 11.) 11:10. The word "militant" is not only not libelous of one of the fiercest (and best) polemicists in U.S. journalism, it is actually tamer than the words the source used ("nastiness" and "attack-dog mentality"). In the context here, it should not make anyone think of AK-47s or ISIS types. | |||
| 12.) 17:10. Parker's "empty brackets" relate to a plural "s" that had been correctly edited out of a complex sentence that was being quoted. Like many of Parker's subsequent edits, this one appears to reflect a sincere misstep and / or unfamiliarity with the source material. | |||
| 13.) 19:53. Overlinking (an ever-present danger in this article, addressed during the FA process in 2011) ... no need to link to the U.S. Constitution in this context. | |||
| 14.) 19:57. Mention of the Vietnam War is turned into a link to the Vietnam Memorial. | |||
| 15.) 20:00. No need to create an internal link to SDS here, since it had already been linked two paragraphs earlier. | |||
| 16.) 20:04. Overlinking, this time to "racial discrimination." | |||
| 17.) 20:07. Link to a publisher. On 1 Jan, 2015, possibly in anticipation of this article being summarized and linked on the Main Page, Colonies Chris eliminated virtually all the links to commercial and academic publishers (a couple of dozen), and on 4 Jan I eliminated the rest. We need to be consistent here. | |||
| 18.) 20:25. The "a" is necessary here since there is no one "post-liberal, post-Marxist politics." | |||
| 19.) 20:32. Removal of an ellipse from a direct quote. Perhaps Parker did not understand its function. | |||
| 20.) 20:39. Overlinking again. The word "hippies," not even the subject of the sentence here. | |||
| 21.) 21.01. The reference here is to the idea of New Age politics, not to anything entitled "New Age Politics." | |||
| 22.) 21:04. More overlinking - "military intervention." Moreover, the entire phrase is "humanitarian military intervention," and the phrase appears in a direct quote. | |||
| Four years now, miss you --] (]) 07:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
| 23.) 21:16. This edit belongs, an addition of two commas. I will re-insert them if it's more convenient for you to revert everything at once. | |||
| ... and five and same --] (]) 08:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| If you feel more of Parker's edits should stay, I will defer to your judgment. But I am confident I handled them properly. | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| Again, I appreciate - more than I can say - your good offices here. - ] (]) 01:28, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| :{{ping|Babel41}} It's Sunday and NFL Playoff day today {{=D}} so I'll be getting around to this until tomorrow. In the meantime, feel free to make as many changes and reverts as you wish - my "job" as it were is to make sure the article ceases to be damaged more than making value judgments about the content. That's more your area since you're the subject matter expert. This isn't a content dispute, it's the restoration of valuable material damaged on purpose by a disruptive editor. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 18:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Six}} --] (]) 07:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == "Complete List of My Name is Rachel Corrie Performances" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (] | ]) 12:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ::Frog, - Yes, I too enjoyed Marshon Lynch's vicious running today, so reminiscent of Jim Taylor's style for the Packers in the early 60s. But I am nothing like them and am glad you have my back with regard to consciously disruptive editors (seven entries by Parker today at Talk:Mark Satin: Revision history). I hear what you're saying about content and will revert Psrker's content-oriented edits (#11-22 above) myself late tomorrow. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| ::I tremble for the future of this article; as you may have gathered from it, Satin is no more beloved among Marxists and some Greens than he is among conservatives. I also wonder about the wisdom of letting FA-rated articles be edited by newbies (see edits #11-22 above). But those are issues beyond my pay grade. - ] (]) 07:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 10:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ==Thasnai Sethaseree== | |||
| <blockquote>'''Unused. Superseded by ].'''</blockquote> | |||
| Hi, The page "Thasnai Sethaseree" can be edited if it is not written in the right format. But it should not be deleted due to the reason of advertising or promotional aspect. (] (]) 17:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)). | |||
| :Please create a draft and submit it to ] for review. There was nothing salvageable in that article, and repeatedly making the same argument everywhere is not going to change that. Before you do, make sure you review the ] and make sure the subject meets them. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 18:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Hi FreeRangeFrog. I'm probably becoming quite a pest by now, but wanted to let you know I shared a draft on the Talk page of this article and there is an ongoing discussion (we talked about this article on your Talk page previously). I also started a string at the BLP Noticeboard. So far there is consensus that the current controversy is excessive, but not regarding whether the controversy should have a separate article or be consolidated to Bresch's page. ] (]) 22:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|CorporateM}} I am reticent to engage in something time-consuming because of (temporary) lack of time. But I do agree that the controversy is excessive, both in standalone form and in the subject's bio, and could probably be summarized in a paragraph or two. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 21:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> --]<sup>«¦]¦»</sup> 08:07, 6 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion of my page Utsav Lal == | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Institute of Culinary Education Logo.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned non-free use-notice --> --]<sup>«¦]¦»</sup> 07:02, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I just realised that my page containing biography of living person Utsav Lal has been deleted or proposed for deletion ( not sure which one is currently the status). The reason indicated seems to be not enough references to substantiate information.I am totally unsure why this should have come up since multiple external links and facts were added to my page to substantiate all information. In case, thee was something that did not still have references, I can add links or edit. | |||
| Request if you can advise on what needs to be done now.I would like to edit the page as per the wikipedia guidelines and restore but am unable to do anything. Alternatively, can I set up a new page. Please help. Sangita <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :As it was explained in your talk page, please create a draft and submit it for review. <span style="color:red; font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;">§]</span><sup>]</sup> 21:03, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:02, 28 December 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. FreeRangeFrog has not edited Misplaced Pages since 26 August 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
 | This is my talk page. Please be nice! Click here to leave me a new message. I normally respond here, and I'll be watching your page (in a good froggy way) if I left you a message there. if you're just bored and want to look at frogs, I recommend The Commons. |
 Archives |
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux 00:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Hope you are OK
Hi Frog. It's been a long time since anyone here has heard from you and you are missed. The very abrupt nature of your apparent departure has some people worried. Could you drop a line here, or even a private email to someone on Misplaced Pages just to let us know you are OK? Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi from me too. Yes, what happened to you? I hope you are okay. We miss you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Four years now, miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
... and five and same --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| Six years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
"Complete List of My Name is Rachel Corrie Performances" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Complete List of My Name is Rachel Corrie Performances. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Complete List of My Name is Rachel Corrie Performances until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 12:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of AGSB University for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AGSB University is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/AGSB University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Sandstein 10:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Maine College Of Art Logo 2013.jpg
The file File:Maine College Of Art Logo 2013.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused. Superseded by File:Maine College of Art Logo.png.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax 08:07, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Institute of Culinary Education Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Institute of Culinary Education Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax 07:02, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: