Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sphilbrick: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:41, 21 January 2015 editCorporateM (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,012 edits Request Edits: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:33, 10 January 2025 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,118 edits Books & Bytes – Issue 66: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 45K |maxarchivesize = 45K
|counter = 53 |counter = 135
|minthreadsleft = 30 |minthreadsleft = 30
|minthreadstoarchive = 5 |minthreadstoarchive = 5
Line 7: Line 7:
|archive = User talk:Sphilbrick/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Sphilbrick/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{archive banner}} {{archives|banner=yes}}
<!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


{{divbox|radius=15px|amber|FYI:|
'''Copyright issue?'''


If you are coming to open a discussion with me because I reverted an edit of yours as a copyright issue, please make sure your post includes a link to the article in question - not just the name of the article, a link. Then read the following:
==CSD nomination of Harshhussey articles==
{{Whisperback|David Condrey|CSD nomination of Harshhussey articles}}


I typically use an edit summary with "copyright issue re ''URL''", or "cv ''URL''". The URL identifies source material that matches your edit too closely.
== Dematerialization ==


'''Copy Within Misplaced Pages'''
{{Talkback|sargdub}}
If you added material to an article which came from an existing article in Misplaced Pages, it is highly likely that this will be flagged as a potential copyright violation in our CopyPatrol software.


If you followed the best practices at ], you left an edit summary indicating the source, I will mark it as acceptable, and you are probably not reading this message. On the other hand, if you did not identify what you did in an edit summary, then I probably reverted the edit. However, the indicated source URL will not be the Misplaced Pages article, it will be be some site that copied from Misplaced Pages. (As a technical point, this is not a false positive because failing to follow best practices means that the attribution requirements have not been followed.) If the edit has been revision deleted, let me know so I can reverse it and you can provide the proper attribution. If it was not revision deleted but simply reverted, feel free to undo my revert, explaining carefully in the edit summary why you are doing so and add the proper attribution.
== Gender Gap Strategy: Join us for a call! ==


'''Other issues'''
{{You've got mail}}
There are other reasons why your edit may have been reverted in error. I do a lot of reviews of flagged issues. In 1 to 2% of the cases, I do make a mistake and I'm happy to rectify it. Some sources of errors:
* Source page which has a full copyright notice at the bottom of the page but material within the page is properly licensed. Sometimes that license is buried in the page and sometimes on a separate page.
* Source material that is public domain but not clearly identified as such.
* Source material that is properly licensed but I somehow failed to notice the license
In any of these cases, politely let me know and I will remedy this situation as quickly as possible.}}


== April editathons at Women in Red ==
== Thanks ==


== January 2020 at Women in Red ==
Thanks for deleting all those user pages – I thought it was time for a clean-out. Best wishes, ] (]) 15:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
:Happy to help--]] 17:17, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
== AIG logo licenses ==
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |] <small>January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153</small>
<br />
'''''Happy Holidays from all of us at ], and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!'''
<br /><br />
'''Online events:'''
* New: ] '''/''' ] '''/''' ] '''/''' ]
* Continuing: ] '''/''' ]
]
<br />
'''Editor feedback:'''
* Help us plan our future events at the ]
* Join the conversations on our ]
<br />
'''Social media:'''
] '''/'''
] '''/'''
] '''/'''
]
<br /><br />
'''Stay in touch:'''
] '''/''' ]
|}
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/O-Z&oldid=930696043 -->


== Copyright violations on Chartered Institutes for the Management of Sport and Physical Activity ==
Hi Sphilbrick, I'm a relatively new editor, but I was just looking at the license for the , and noticed it was classified as public domain. Any chance you can look up in the Wikimedia Commons OTRS queue and take a look at how the logo was submitted? When you find the original submission, could you help me understand how and who decides to re-assign a particular CC license to public domain? Thanks! --] (]) 21:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
:There is nothing in OTRS.


https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Chartered_Institute_for_the_Management_of_Sport_and_Physical_Activity
:As noted on the image page, it was uploaded by {{ping|Jbarta}} and licensed pd on the basis that it "does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain".


Thank you for flagging the copyright violation. I agree with the removal. However, there was other content that was removed that did not come from the website you flagged. This included infobox additions, a new section, and other text in the introduction not related to the vision/mission paragraphs.
:(I am curious how you came to contact me, because I worked with a different version of the logo, but not that one. No big deal, just curious.)--]] 14:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


I have reintroduced these elements onto the page. I will leave mission/vision absent.
::Thanks for the prompt reply! I was curious about logo copyrights, and had been looking over the history of the different versions of the logo. I had assumed that the AIG logo had a copyright (and thus also assumed it would be in the OTRS queue), and was curious about Misplaced Pages's guidelines regarding the autonomy of users' interpretations of applying PD licenses to non-PD material. I thought to ask you about the newer version of the logo, since I saw your involvement on ] and mistakenly assumed that the new version would have also gone through OTRS. I suppose my question at this point would be how does a user-submitted image supersede the one submitted for fair use by the company itself? Is part of the push for the use of .SVG images over other filetypes, or just a matter of preference for PD licenses? --] (]) 23:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)


COI on my profile. Happy to add elsewhere if needed.
== OTRS Question ==


https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Reece_at_CIMSPA
Hi, Could you have a look at {{ticket#|2014110410013922}} - looking at the editing, it seems to be up your street. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
:While it may not seem like the right thing to do, it is convention, when identifying a copyright issue, to do a rollback, which sometimes picks up other copyright issues and sometimes picks up inrelated,a nd non-problematic issues. You are always welcome to restore the non-copyright issue edits.
:{{ping|Ronhjones}} Thanks for bringing it to my attention. "R" means Rookie. I responded.--]] 21:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
=={{Font|color=red|••{{Font|color=white|bgcolor=Red|••{{font|color=white|🎄Merry Christmas🎄}}••}}••|bgcolor=White}}==
::Thanks for that ]<sup>]</sup> 00:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
{{quote|"May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a {{Font|bgcolor=red|color=white|..Merry Christmas..}} and a {{Font|bgcolor=red|color=white|..Happy New Year..}}, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you {{Font|bgcolor=red|color=white|..warm greetings..}} for Christmas and New Year 2021."<br><br>{{Font|bgcolor=red|color=white|Happy editing,}}<br>]}}


== Women in Red October 2024 ==
== Question about Arbitration page ==


{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
I happened to be reading ] (which I found linked from ]), and I saw this part that didn't seem correct to me:
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
<blockquote>
|rowspan="2" |
"Misplaced Pages:Blocking policy provides that users may be blocked for repeated vandalism but not under current policy for disruptive editing although such a policy is proposed."
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ]'''<big>]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320</small>
</blockquote>
<br />
Is that really the case? (that blocking policy does not allow blocks for disruptive editing?) The ] has a whole section on ] stating that "A block for disruption may be necessary in response to:..."


'''Online events:'''
Are normal editors allowed to edit this page? (its under Arbitration so I wasn't sure)
* ''New'': ] <big>|</big> ] <big>|</big> ]
--] (]) 01:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
:On second look I see that the ] page says: "These indexes are no longer maintained. To browse principles passed in recent decisions of the committee, use the "Cases" link above to load a final decision." And "Links which are struck through lead to historical archives that are no longer maintained. All other links are current committee archives." And the "Principles" are struck through, and so no longer maintained. Guess I'll be looking to change ] instead to remove the link. Sorry for bothering you. --] (]) 02:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


* ''Continuing'': ] <big>|</big> ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small>
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
I'm posting the following since you had some comments about this article back when it was first created, and your input would be most welcome:
'''Announcements from other communities'''
* October is Women in Green's "]" Good Article Edit-a-thon
'''Tip of the month:'''
* ''Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at ]''


'''Other ways to participate:'''
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
* ]. You can always ].
* ].
* ] and add any general ideas on developing the project.
* Follow us on social media:
] '''|'''
] '''|'''
]
|}
--] (] 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/O-Z&oldid=1247733137 -->

== Administrators' newsletter – October 2024 ==

] from the past month (September 2024).

]

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}

] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}

] '''Guideline and policy news'''
*] are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to ] (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with ] from October 8 to 14, a ] from October 22 to 24, and ] from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at ].
* Following ], the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion ] to ]. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
* A ] is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an ] process.

] '''Arbitration'''
* The arbitration case '']'' has been closed.
* An arbitration case regarding ] has been opened.
* Editors are invited to ''']''' to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until ''23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC)''.

] '''Miscellaneous'''
* If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put ] and ] on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

----
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1248355798 -->

== Invitation to participate in a research ==

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.


Kind Regards,
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.


]
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 01:58, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
== neutral RfC notification ==
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->


== Women in Red November 2024 ==
] has a discussion on succession box usage. You had previously noted or opined at ] thanks. ] (]) 21:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
== Evidence in Gamergate ==
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ]'''<big>]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323</small>
<br />


'''Online events:'''
As you are a clerk on this case, I thought I would ask you. It appears to me that several of the evidence submitted links to reddit in the ] are not currently admissible per ], is that right? (Additionally, I'm not sure exactly what it means by "private communications" would this include a public off-wiki website like reddit as well? Or is that only private "other websites"?) --] (]) 07:15, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
* ''New'': ] <big>|</big> ] <big>|</big> ]
:Looks like ] just solved that problem: ] --] (]) 23:02, 29 November 2014 (UTC)


* ''Continuing'': ] <big>|</big> ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small>
== A barnstar for you! ==
'''Announcements from other communities'''
* Annual is an online campaign designed to boost <br>Asian content on Misplaced Pages each November.
* ]. These Wikiproject clean-up lists offer a start <br>to November's backlog drive, e.g. and
'''Tip of the month:'''
* ''Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed images at <br>''


'''Other ways to participate:'''
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
* ]. You can always ].
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
* ].
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Real Life Barnstar'''
* ] and add any general ideas on developing the project.
|-
* Follow us on social media:
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I appreciated your contribution to wikipedia. ] (]) 03:20, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
] '''|'''
] '''|'''
]
|} |}
--] (] 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/O-Z&oldid=1253900839 -->


== Administrators' newsletter – November 2024 ==
== ] ==
Hello, according to AFC news, Republic of China (Taiwan) is been approved to host the ], here is the link (http://www.ettoday.net/news/20141126/430846.htm). However, when I try to create this page, I found that this page had already deleted, so can you tell me how to recover it? ] (]) 03:25, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
:{{ping|Younis7435}} I restored it, but see it is two short sentences. In the future, it would be easier to start over than to deal with the bureaucracy.--]] 14:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


] from the past month (October 2024).
==Orphaned non-free image File:TBW Hor noTag low res.png==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


]
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 00:08, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
:I uploaded per request, have no problem if it is deleted because no longer used.--]] 14:07, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


] '''Administrator changes'''
==Clerk issue - word limits; 500, 1000 or simply be succinct?==
:] {{hlist|class=inline
Hi, Sphilbrick. I see you've been addressing word limit issues recently, so perhaps you could take a look at this, or forward it to someone who can. The instructions at the top of ] say in bold print, ''"...complete your statement, which must try to state your request and reasoning, in 500 words or fewer."'' However, it also directs the editor to use ], which instructs the editor to state the ''"rationale for the requested amendment, comprising no more than 1000 words."'' Then, when the editor finally opens an edit window to submit an amendment request, the instruction banner above that edit window instructs only, ''"Be succinct. Long, rambling contributions are less effective. Substantiate your submissions with diffs or links"'', but doesn't mention a word limit. Would it be possible to standardize the word limit instructions on these three pages? Not a pressing issue, of course, but I thought it worth mentioning. Regards, ] (]) 01:39, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''CheckUser changes'''
== Historicity of Jesus ==
:] ]


] '''Oversighter changes'''
Please close ]. ] (]) 23:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
:] ]
:And can you remove comment? It was added ''after'' the thread was closed and minimized by an arb. Thank you. ] (]) 19:48, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
::Sorry, but I am under the weather at the moment.--]] 20:10, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
:::No rush. It can wait until you are over the weather. :0) ] (]) 04:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Ignocrates}}Sorry about the timing. As mentioned I was severely under the weather, and now merely under the weather. I see that an arb already responded to your first request. I removed the comment, because it was posted after the request to shut the discussion down. --]] 21:04, 10 December 2014 (UTC)


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
== Request ==
* Following a ], the ] proposal that went for a trial to refine the ] (RfA) process has been discontinued.
* Following a ], ] is adopted as a policy.


] '''Technical news'''
I'm not sure that I saw the official "request" that you allude to , but there are lots of things I don't see and that could be one of them. ] (]) 21:01, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
* Mass deletions done with the ] tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. {{phab|T366068}}
:I hope not to make a big deal out of it, but when a discussion is hatted, especially by an arb with the edit summary " shut it down", it is highly undesirable to permit the discussion to continue. If something needs to be said, perhaps it could be directed to an arbs or multiple arbs via email. --]] 21:07, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
::I didn't see the edit summary, I guess. Sorry about that. ] (]) 21:10, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
:::No problem. Like you, I miss a lot of things, which is why we seem to adopt a similar approach - ask politely, rather than pointedly, because sometimes there is an answer. I need to do it more often.--]] 21:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)


] '''Arbitration'''
== Simsbury Bank and Trust Company Building ==
* {{noping|RoySmith}}, {{noping|Barkeep49}} and {{noping|Cyberpower678}} have been appointed to the ] for the ]. {{noping|ThadeusOfNazereth}} and {{noping|Dr vulpes}} are reserve commissioners.
* Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the ].
* The Arbitration Committee is ] for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
] '''Miscellaneous'''
* An ] is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{tl|Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. ]


----
I believe you photographed the wrong building for ]. The correct building (now described in the article), is at the NE corner of Hopmeadow and Station, according to Google Street View. I can't tell how these buildings' addresses relate to what's in the National Register (760-62 Hopmeadow), so if you go back to photograph the right building, can you get its address? '']''] 23:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
{{center|{{flatlist|
:I'll look into it.--]] 23:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 10:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1254686817 -->


== Books & Bytes – Issue 65 ==
== New Misplaced Pages Library Accounts Now Available (December 2014) ==


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
<div style="font-size: 1.5em; margin: 0 100px;">
]</div>
<div style="line-height: 1.2;">
<span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">'''The Misplaced Pages Library''': ''Books & Bytes''</span><br />
Issue 65, September – October 2024
</div>
<div style="margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: 1.2em;">
* Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Misplaced Pages Library
* Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
* Tech tip: Mass downloads
<big>''']'''</big>
</div>
</div>
<small>Sent by ] on behalf of The Misplaced Pages Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Samwalton9 (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Recipients&oldid=27730094 -->

== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].

Take the survey ''''''.

Kind Regards,


]
Hello Wikimedians!
]
] is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our ]. You can sign up for:


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
*] - science and medicine journals and books
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->
*] - chemistry journals
*] - ebook monographs
*]- art books


== Smiley award!!!! :D ==
Other partnerships with accounts available are listed on ]. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Misplaced Pages projects: sign up today!
<br>--].00:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


<div style="background-color:#f9f0C9; border:1px solid #888850; padding:2px; width:300px;">
:''You can host and coordinate signups for a Misplaced Pages Library branch in your own language. Please contact ].''<br>
]<small>For your contributions to Misplaced Pages and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted <b>].</b><br />(])</small>
:<small>This message was delivered via the ] tool to ].</small>
</div> </div>
] (]) 21:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Sadads@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Recipients&oldid=636023288 -->


:Thanks!
== Evidence "closure" ==
:I've been much less active for the last couple years but posts like this inspire me to try to do better. ]] 13:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
::youre welcome!! I'm glad they inspire you 😸❤️ ] (]) 16:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
Can you explain this diff to me: ? ] (]) 19:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
:No idea. Sorry, I'm still under the weather, trying to get back to my responsibilities, but not back yet. That edit doesn't mean anything to me.--]] 16:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
:: Ahh, no problem. Who is clerking the Gamergate page? That's all the evidence submitted after the deadline. ] (]) 16:27, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
== Happy Holidays! ==
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->

== Hi Sphilbrick ==

It's a joy to see your username back on the CopyPatrol list! ] (]) 04:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

:Thanks! ]] 12:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

== Draft:2010 Albert Lea tornado ==

Just to let you know, the "all-caps" material was from the ] (see source linked at bottom), I was rewriting it, since an ''exact'' copy of the NWS isn't very encyclopedic. Source is in the public domain, as well. :) ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 14:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

:I am aware that the material comes from NOAA which is public domain, but it still needs to be attributed, and unless there is a very good reason , all-caps isn't acceptable. ]] 15:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
::Well, that's just how they write (see ). I guess I should have cited it, but I don't have a tool that just "de-caps" everything. Anyways, that's off the point. Since the device I write with is too smll to comfortably do the "double-window" thing with, I just paste the PD material (whether it's caps or not) into the draft, rewrite it, and then delete it. ]<sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 15:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

== Draft: Daniel P. McCoy ==

You deleted my draft for Albany County Executive Daniel P. McCoy's page due to "Copyright Infringement" can you please explain the error so I can remedy it? I am new to Misplaced Pages so I understand that I may have formatted it wrong. However, please be aware that I am a representative of his office and have permission to use his official bio and photos from our website. ] (]) 14:22, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

:It is not a question of format.
:The issue is that this page: is fully copyrighted unless acceptably licensed for use in Misplaced Pages.
:You almost certainly other person you claim to be but we don't know that officially, and we can't take you word for it.
:There is a process for providing a license for that site so that it can be used by Misplaced Pages.
:There is a link:
:https://commons.wikimedia.org/Commons:Email_templates
:See ]
:For going that route, please be aware that if you are a representative of his office then you have a conflict of interest issue and should not be editing a page about him.
:Sorry for the bureaucracy but it's necessary.
:Here's a link to a page specifically designed for new editors to ask questions. ]
:I urge you to post there, explain your position relative to Daniel McCoy, and I am fairly certain you will get advice that discourages you from writing such an article. That's without even addressing the question of copyright. ]] 15:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

== Draft:Tom D. O'Malley - draft versus sanbox ==

Hello Sphilbrick - I have a quick question regarding the best location on wiki to develop draft articles.

Background: I am developing what will be a very comprehensive article on Tom O'Malley (the founder of the modern independent refining industry). I grabbed parts of a relatively weak (and 25-year-old stale article from Encyclopedia.com) as a starting framework. My article will be 5-10x as long as the starting point and probably have >100 references. However, while it was sitting in draft mode (for literally minutes) without being submitted under AfC, and without its citations, a bot picked up the similarity with encyclopedia.com (which surprised me given that it was a draft as patrolling drafts seems a bit odd). I then cut the text out and put it into my sandbox - leaving the draft space empty but did not delete the draft shell as I plan to repopulate when the article is more mature.

The sandbox does not appear to be bot-patrolled (please disabuse me if this is wrong).

I have run into similar issues when I bring in a large new article from MS Word all at once and save before the citations have been completed (in draft mode). Should all of this work be done in the sandbox versus the draft space? This seems a bit counterintuitive to me. thank you

here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Tom_D._O%27Malley

] (]) 18:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

:I believe the sandbox is patrolled. It must be as I occasionally see it pop up in the notifications of potential copyright issues. Neither the draft space nor the sandbox are acceptable places for starting articles if your approach is to bring in copyrighted information and then clean it up. While I personally think that's never a desirable editing approach, I get that sometimes people do it that way. If you choose to work that way, it must be done off-line.
:Material in draft space and in sandbox space doesn't have to fully meet final editing standards such as formatting or even complete citations, but it can never ever have copyrighted text other than the obvious exceptions (short excerpts as block quotes or within quotation marks) ]] 20:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
::Ok - thanks for the heads up. ] (]) 17:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

== Women in Red December 2024 ==

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ]'''<big>]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 </small>
<br />

'''Online events:'''
* ''New'': ] <big>|</big> ]

* ''Continuing'': ] <big>|</big> ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small>
'''Announcements from other communities'''
* ] have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is<br> December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact ] or<br> ]. ] members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting

'''Tip of the month:'''
* ''Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a ].''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
* ]. You can always ].
* ].
* ] and add any general ideas on developing the project.
* Follow us on social media:
] '''|'''
] '''|'''
]
|}
--] (] 18:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/O-Z&oldid=1260022450 -->

== Administrators' newsletter – December 2024 ==

] from the past month (November 2024).

]

] '''Administrator changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}

] '''Interface administrator changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] ]

] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}

] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* Following ], the ] has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the ] within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
* Following a ], a new speedy deletion criterion, ], has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.

] '''Technical news'''
* Technical volunteers can now register for the ], which will take place in Istanbul, Turkey. is open from November 12 to December 10, 2024.

] '''Arbitration'''
* The arbitration case '']'' (formerly titled '']'') has been closed.
* An arbitration case titled '']'' has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 14 December.


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |
---- ----
{{center|{{flatlist|
'''Hello Sphilbrick, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. <br>
* ]
Happy editing,<br>
* ]
] (]) 04:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
* ]
}}}}<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1259680487 -->


== Deleted without courtesy warning. ==
''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}''

Please revert the deletion of draft article at ] and let me delete the the copyright offensive material. This is going to be my first article.

I did not realise that a public description of a book on Amazon is subject to copyright.

Thank you,

Janos Abel ] (]) 21:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

:With rare exceptions, everything you add to an article should be in your own words. Some of the exceptions include short quotes with the material is in a block quote or marked with quote marks and attributed. Other exceptions include public domain text which is properly attributed. My guess is some people are confused with the term public domain and think that things found in public websites constitute public domain. If that's your assumption it is quite incorrect.
:My recollection is that there was not much of value beyond the copyrighted material in the draft article I deleted so I'm declining to restore it. ]] 22:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you for the explanation.
::So is there no way to write an article now for that book?
::Harsh regime to enforce. I was not allowed to correct an error due to misunderstanding or insufficient competency.
::There is plenty of value and noteworthiness I can put into that article during the weeks to come. ] (]) 23:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
:::I decided to take a second look on the chance that I misremembered the contents. Here's the entire contents of the article excluding the copyrighted portion:
::::''A book by Fred Harrison and Mason Gaffney edition published in 2023 by Shepheard-Walwyn.'' ]] 00:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Thank you for this second chance. Teaches me to be more careful about rules. ] (]) 17:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

== Requesting undeletion ==

''Dear Sir, I noticed that my recent article ] was speedily deleted due to copyright infringement. I sincerely apologize for this oversight and kindly request you to consider restoring the article temporarily, so I can remove the infringing content and improve it in compliance with Misplaced Pages's guidelines.''

''Thank you for your time and understanding.'' ] (]) 14:27, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

:Sorry that's not an option. I can and did email you the contents although it was unbelievably painful due to the convoluted history of this article ]] 14:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
::Sir, can I rewrite and rectify my mistakes ? @] ] (]) 14:49, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
:::Sure. I sent the contents of the deleted draft to you by email. ]] 15:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
:::Many Thanks !! ] (]) 15:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

== Lake Pape ==

As a new wikipedia editor, I am guaranteed to mess up, and I would appreciate some advise on adding information and sources to stubs or any article as I am not sure what is against the copyright rules. On the ] article you reversed my additions but I am not sure why it broke copyright rules, thank you for understanding my good intentions. ] (]) 00:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

:Thanks for asking so politely. I'm sure it can be jarring when you're trying to make good faith improvements to an article and find they been removed.
:Look at your first sentence of the biodiversity section:
::Lake Pape is rich in ] and is classed as a mesotrophic lake on the ].
:Now check out and look at the first sentence of the biodiversity section:
::Lake Pape is rich in organic matter - a mesotrophic lake.
:That sentence is a close call, and had it simply been that sentence I would've let it go. However, look at your second sentence:
::There are sharp-leaf ] growing on the shores and bays of the lake.
:And now the second sentence of the site:
::There are sharp-leaf plants growing on the shores and bays of the lake.
:There are several additional sentences, some identical, some close paraphrases.
:The next issue is whether the source issue is acceptably licensed so that it could be used (with attribution course)
:Many sites include a footer with the copyright status of the site. In this case, there is no such indication at the bottom of the page, nor is there at the bottom of the . Occasionally, I will run across editors who think the absence of a copyright statement means there is no copyright. While that was true many decades ago, the law was changed and the default assumption is that material is subject to full copyright even if there is no particular notice. There are some exceptions such as material created by US federal employees in the course of their employment, but that doesn't apply here.
:The site appears to be associated with the country Latvia. While I have not memorized the copyright laws in every country, many countries are part of the ]. Latvia has been a signatory since 1995. See also The Berne Convention states that material is automatically subject to copyright as opposed to requiring a specific indication. (This is a casual summary. ) If you have information suggesting that this site is public domain, please let me know. ]] 13:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you for such a kind response. But does this mean I can't use the information from the site or does this mean I just have to write in my own words? ] (]) 13:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
:::You can use the information, in fact you should use it as a reference, but you should write it in your own words. I urge you to read ]. Some editors were under the impression that as long as they change a few words here and there will not be an exact copy which is correct, the key issue is whether it's essentially the same thing. This can be tricky as your goal is to make the same point. Good practice is not to copy a sentence and then try to change it, but read the whole site and ideally some other relevant site, and then write your own summary. When done, take a look at the original source on the chance your memory is so good you managed to largely reproduce it. Good luck, and thanks for your interest in contributing. ]] 13:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Thank you very much for the assistance and support! ] (]) 13:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

== What's the point of contributing? ==

I just edited Bedinvetmab to add the MOA which is missing. I pulled the info from the manufacturers prescribing information - i.e. the primary source and my edit was removed because of copyright violations? This is my first contribution to Misplaced Pages and based on this experience likely my last. ] (]) 17:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

:I hope you will reconsider.
:The early edits of many new contributors arise because they read an article, realize some important information is missing, go out and find that information and add that information copying and pasting from the original source, not realizing that this is almost always a violation of copyright policy.
:Contributing to Misplaced Pages is a little bit harder than some realize, because it means you have to write the information in your own words (with some rare exceptions such as identified short quotes, and material from some public domain sources.)
:We want material added to Misplaced Pages articles to be reliable and while it might seem obvious that the words written by the actual manufacturer would be the best source, that's not necessarily the case. Manufacturers have a potential conflict of interest. One hopes they write factually and unbiased but one can't be sure, which is why we like to support additions to articles with citations to reliable sources that is places that have a reputation for being unbiased.
:You asked about the point of contributing. The point is that when done correctly, Misplaced Pages can serve as a source of information which is as free of bias is we as a community can manage. All done by volunteers and free to the public. ]] 18:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::Makes sense on one hand, on the other hand, if the point is to fact check because "while it might seem obvious that the words written by the actual manufacturer would be the best source, that's not necessarily the case. Manufacturers have a potential conflict of interest." then I would have expected the community to edit what I wrote if it's factually incorrect rather than delete it. ] (]) 18:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
:::There are two issues which relate to two of the five pillers of Misplaced Pages. ]
:::The second pillar:
:::'''Misplaced Pages is written from a neutral point of view'''
:::Is why we have concerns about accepting material from the manufacturer without question. That's why we push for "citations based on reliable sources" in sources with a conflict of interest which aren't viewed as reliable. That doesn't totally exclude the use of information from a manufacturer. For example a statement such as "according to the manufacturer, lorem Ipsum..." Might be acceptable if it's clear that the words are not in Misplaced Pages's voice and should be taken with a grain of salt.
:::The second issue relates to the third pillar:
:::'''Misplaced Pages is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute'''
:::That means we need to "respect copyright laws and never plagiarize from any sources". ]] 18:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

== Copy of an article ==

could you provide a copie of the article ] ] (]) 13:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

:Sent to your email address ]] 13:50, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
::Not visible. Regards,''']''' (]) 11:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
:::What does that mean? ]] 13:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

== Women in Red January 2025 ==

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ] ]'''<big>]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 </small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''
* ''New'': ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small> <big>|</big> ] <big>|</big> ]
* ''Continuing'': ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small> <big>|</big> ]
'''Announcements from other communities'''
* Celebrate ] on Jan 15, 2025
* Participate in ] Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025

'''Tip of the month:'''
* Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding <nowiki>{{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}}</nowiki> to your user page.

'''Other ways to participate:'''
* ]. You can always ].
* ].
* ] and add any general ideas on developing the project.
* Follow us on social media:
] '''|'''
] '''|'''
]
|} |}
--] (] 17:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<small>Sent by ] (]) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;{{Noping|Technical 13}}&#125;&#125; to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on ]</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Technical 13@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Technical_13/Holiday_list&oldid=639096433 --> <!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/O-Z&oldid=1261468023 -->


== Your revert at ] ==
== Hi ==


Your revert reinstated numerous errors. Why?
I saw your post on WT:MILHIST and then remembered that you're one of the named clerks for the Gamergate case. If you have a moment, could you please have a look at ] I left on Callaneccc's talk page? Thanks, ] &#124; ] 22:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
* I left you a message there on Talk, where your reasons for your unsupported revert should have been noted.
:Looking now. --]] 22:43, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
* I provided a reliable source for the simplest corrections of the original history of Buddhist robes, when the numerous errors were completely unsourced, those multiple errors your revert reinstated - on New Year's Eve, of all inappropriate times.
::Haven't forgotten, but I'm scheduled to retire tomorrow, and had a pile of paper work to do I hadn't counted on, will try to do something in the morning, though I then have to drive to North Carolina, so it will take a bit to resolve this.--]] 22:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
] (]) 09:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)


:I responded at your talk page. ]] 14:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
== Lynne Lorenzen – interested in creating article ==


== Courland Uprising ==
Hi Sphilbrick, thought you might be interested in creating ]. She appears on both ] (1987) and ] (I also see where you began a user subpage in July 2010, ], for her). I'm sure there are plenty of sources that would qualify for GNG. Normally I'd write the article myself, but I've been pretty inactive for the past few months because of a new career. ] (]) 14:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
:Oh and happy holidays! ] (]) 14:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
::Thanks, no time at the moment, but should have some soon (see response to post above) Congrats on the new career.--]] 22:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


Hello. You deleted my edits on ], destroying my hard work. I would like to politely ask you to send me text you deleted, so I can rewritte it and get back to working on my article :) I know that your bot flagged it as "copywritted", but it was just a quote from a newspaper, I pasted so I could use its informations in the article. It obviously wasn't intended to be in the final version. ] (]) 22:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
== Happy New Year Sphilbrick! ==
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;{{border-radius|1em}} {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}}<!--
-->" class="plainlinks">]]
{{Paragraph break}}
{{Center|{{resize|179%|''''']!'''''}}}}
'''Sphilbrick''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. --] (]) <span style="font-size: 50%;">]</span> 05:53, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
<br /><br />
{{Center|1=<small>Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.</small>}}
</div>


:I'm puzzled that you say it was "just a quote from a newspaper". That's exactly what is meant by violation of copyright rules. It is permitted to use short quotes if enclosed in quotation marks or set off as a block quote and if they are properly sourced neither of which apply here.
== 2015 already ==
:You seem to be under the impression that it's okay to have copyrighted material in a draft. It is not. It's never a good practice to start with copyrighted material and massage it but if you must, do it in an off-line editor.
:My reversion may have picked up otherwise acceptable edits because it's standard practice to revert all consecutive edits by the same editor. I can send you the material but you need to turn on your email option in your preferences so that I can send it to you via email. Alternatively, and more easily for you, I turned off the code which hides the edits so you can recover the edits yourself. Let me know when you are done so I can turn back on the revision deletion code. ]] 00:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)


== Issue Regarding Khawaspur Page ==
Hi Sphilbrick. No frills - just a quiet ‘’all the best’’ to you for 2015 and I hope you’ll continue to be around on Misplaced Pages for a long time to come.--] (]) 12:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
:Thanks. I've been away for a few days, trying to dig out form under, but here for the long haul.--]] 15:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)


Hii @] , Thanks for letting me about my mistakes regarding Copyright issue. i should repharse it on my own words. i will surely keep in mind for further editing in future.
== Question about Draft:Calin Rovinescu Page Deletion ==
Apart from this , This ] page is totally mistaken to Pakistan which is totally wrong. there is nothing like khawaspur village or ] in Pakistan. Also there is no any citation in page that support it a village in Pakistan. Only one citation is there which say it's in India.
Also i checked all contribution history also , editors also claim that this page has many mistakes.
So allow me to do a revision of this whole page. i surely will provide a reputable citation for it. I will again keep in mind about copyright issues matter.


Much Regards ] (]) 20:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello,
This is a friendly follow-up on a page I submitted for review that was deleted (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.aircanada.com/en/about/media/bio/Rovinescu.html). Full disclosure, I work for Air Canada so I would like to avoid any conflict of interest by submitted an article for review. Two questions: 1. the page sited under G12 is an Air Canada page. Do you require a special permission to use this page? 2. May I have advise on what could be changed in the draft to avoid duplicating G12 again?


:Thanks for replying. ] (]) 20:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Calin_Rovinescu
:Go for it. I agree, it seems clear it is in India, so a complete overhaul is warranted. ]] 22:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)


== Administrators' newsletter – January 2025 ==
Thanks for any advice.


] from the past month (December 2024).
] (]) 18:23, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
:Sorry for the delay - see response in post above. Will try to look soon, later today I hope.--]] 15:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)


<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
== Merging WNBA player and basketball biography templates ==
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">


] '''Administrator changes'''
There is currently a proposal ] to merge the "Infobox:WNBA player" template into the "Infobox:basketball biography" template (as has already been agreed to via the consensus process). Please weigh in on the proposal to make this happen. Thanks. ] (]) 00:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
:] ]
:Hi Sphilbrick. I wanted to ask again if you could weigh in on this. We've had good discussion and my sense is that we're close to a workable solution to merge these. That said, I am nervous that no big women's hoops editors like yourself have commented yet. I'd hate to decide on a path just to find it doesn't work. Thanks. ] (]) 14:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''CheckUser changes'''
== Books and Bytes - Issue 9 ==
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]
:] ]

</div>
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
]

] '''Oversight changes'''
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]


<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">
] '''The Misplaced Pages Library'''
</div> </div>
<div style = "font-size: 1.5em; margin: 0 100px">
]</div>
<div style = "line-height: 1.2">
<span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">'''''Books & Bytes'''''</span><br />
Issue 9, November-December 2014<br>
by {{user|The Interior}}, {{user|Ocaasi}}, {{user|Sadads}}
</div> </div>


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em">
* Following ], ] was adopted as a ].
*New donations, including real-paper-and-everything books, e-books, science journal databases, and more
* A ] is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
*New TWL coordinators, conference news, a new open-access journal database, summary of library-related WMF grants, and more
] '''Technical news'''
*Spotlight: "Global Impact: The Misplaced Pages Library and Persian Misplaced Pages" - a Persian Misplaced Pages editor talks about their experiences with database access in Iran, writing on the Persian project and the JSTOR partnership
* The Nuke feature also now ] to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.
<p><big>]</big><br><br>
</div> ] (]) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:The Interior@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Recipients&oldid=641474928 -->


] '''Arbitration'''
== Neutral notification ==
* Following the ], the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: {{noping|CaptainEek}}, {{noping|Daniel}}, {{noping|Elli}}, {{noping|KrakatoaKatie}}, {{noping|Liz}}, {{noping|Primefac}}, {{noping|ScottishFinnishRadish}}, {{noping|Theleekycauldron}}, {{noping|Worm That Turned}}.


] '''Miscellaneous'''
You previously voted, opined, commented, or otherwise took part, at ]. Please see a related discussion at ]. ] (]) 15:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
* A ] is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the ]. ]


----
==Infobox photo discussion==
{{center|{{flatlist|
Hi again. Happy New Year. Can you offer your opinion on which photo is better for the Infobox ]? If you're not able to participate, just disregard this message; you don't have to message me. Thanks. ] (]) 01:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
* ]
:Responded.--]] 16:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 15:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1266956718 -->


== Mischgerät (V-2 guidance computer) Copyright Reversion ==
:Hi. Thanks for participating in the . I really appreciate it. One thing: A new photo has been uploaded and added to the discussion. I hope I'm not bothering you by asking if you would mind indicating whether this changes your viewpoint, or whether it remains unchanged? Thank you very much. ] (]) 12:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)


For the article ] at URL "https://en.wikipedia.org/Mischgerät_(V-2_guidance_computer)":
== Question about GamerGate Arbcom ==


On 20:14, 7 January 2025, you had noted "Copyright issue re https://engineering.stackexchange.com/questions/49950/is-there-a-schematic-of-hoeltzers-mischger%c3%a4t-v2-a4-electronic-guidance-computer/50286"
This case is long and complicated, and looking at all the statements and evidence posts this is an unenviable possition to be in. Which makes this question that much more awkward: Though the time to submit evidence has obviously already elapsed, could evidence that *couldn't possibly* have been submitted at the time because it was only known to be applicable after the fact?


First off, my bad, in that I 1) was using the Misplaced Pages entry as a text editor for the draft, rather than my sandbox, and 2) didn't promptly add cites.
My example would be the fact that it was only this week that the NorthBySouthBaranof admitted that he was the previous Misplaced Pages users FCYTravis and Polarscribe, and he was previously rebuked by admins on Misplaced Pages for edit warring, abuse of admin tools, article ownership, uncivil bahior, and sockpuppeting, and this could give important context to his actions in this case: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard/Archive_25#Resysopping


I'm the author for the referenced StackExchange question and accepted answer. As I noted on that platform, I machine translated and lightly edited some German language passages from the document "Das Gerät A4 Baureihe B Gerätbeschreibung", downloaded originally from http://www.aggregat4.de/pdf/Gerätebeschreibung_A4.pdf, but since then from https://archive.org/download/technicaldescriptionA4/Gerätebeschreibung_A4_text.pdf
I don't know who is available in what timeframe, so hopefully one of you guys is available to get back to me soon.


Based on my understanding of German copyright law I've gathered within Misplaced Pages regarding Public Domain material, I believe the material in the source PDF is PD in both Germany and the US, based on a lack of a named author, and that it was published a few days short of 80 years ago.
Thank you for your time. ] (]) 02:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)


While the very lightly edited machine translation was adequate for my purposes on StackExchange, it needs a complete rewrite in my own words for easier comprehension on Misplaced Pages, which was what I was in the midst of.
== Outing/Gamergate issue. ==


Was the copyright issue due to similarity with the StackExchange entry, or status of the source document? If the former, it would be helpful - but not critical - to retrieve my draft of the "Operation" section of the "Mischgerät" article.
Hello, Sphilbrick. I was going to ask both you and ] about a comment made on a RfC, but I have found out that Ks0stm is ill at the moment. So, I would like to request that if you do not wish or cannot respond to this that, if you are able, if you could redirect me to an user who might be able. ] and here is the revelant portion of the quote with my emphasis added: {{tq|(...) Both are things where there will, of course, often be doubtful cases where the connection is not safe enough to justify action, but there is no reason to think it categorically impossible to reach a reasonable degree of certainty in some. We all know that ''there is at least one case in connection with the recent Gamergate fracas where it's plain obvious to everybody with half a brain that editor "L." on Misplaced Pages is the same person as participant "L." in a certain troll forum; I, for one, will not be silenced from speaking out'' about this obvious fact, whenever I choose to.}} I was wondering if the user could be warned not to imply a connection that is not proven. (I will note here that the RfC also has tones of the Gamergate issue.) --] (]) 01:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)


If the latter, I'd appreciate guidance on how best to "adjudicate" what would apparently be differing opinions on whether I'm working with PD material or not. ] (]) 23:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
==Burns, Texas==
Hi. I created the page Burns, Texas and I noticed that you deleted a page with that title before due to copyright. I revised the page so it did not infringe copyright--] (]) 21:02, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
== Arbitrator page ==


:I didn't notice that it was that old which would make it PD. I believe SR copyright notice on the page but that might not have applied to the material in question.
Letting you known as gamergate case clerk: There's a lot of churn on ], might want to keep an eye on it. <small>]</small> 01:35, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
:I see that you've had a number of consecutive edits and have edited after I did the reversion so it's not perfectly clear how best to proceed.
:The simplest approach (admittedly for me) is for me to say I'm sorry I missed the underlying material was PD, and let you recover as best you can. Alternatively I can undo my reversion but I think that will mess up edits you've made subsequent to my reversion. ]] 23:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
::In anticipation that reversion would make a mess, I've backed up my current work off-line. If you're willing to undo the revision, I'll copy that to an off-line source and paste the current work back in. ] (]) 00:11, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
:::I've restored it to the version before my reversion. ]] 12:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
:Reviewing other copyright pleas on this page, I now realize I should have been drafting articles off-line from the get-go, rather than piling up my references and just jumping in. ] (]) 00:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
::I applaud you for your initiative to read other examples of editors involved in copyright issues.
::I agree that working off-line is considered a best practice, but we also have a guideline urging you to ]
::Don't feel that you have to do all of your work off-line. Ideally, after any edit, the article should stand on its own. In the early years of Misplaced Pages some people used to put up "under construction" templates to indicate that an article was in the process of transformation but that practice is less common today. ]] 13:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
:::No worries. I'll work to make sure an edit will stand on its own and be cited before leaving it for the night, unlike the revision under discussion! :) ] (]) 14:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)


== Request Edits == == Books & Bytes – Issue 66 ==


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Hi Sphilbrick. It's been a while since I've bothered you about Request Edits and I was wondering if you had time to take a look at a few of mine, such as on Heather Bresch. I've been scrounging looking for editors to chime in on a few pages, but been getting a lot of "I'm busy with other stuff" type responses. ] (]) 20:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
<div style="font-size: 1.5em; margin: 0 100px;">
]</div>
<div style="line-height: 1.2;">
<span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">'''The Misplaced Pages Library''': ''Books & Bytes''</span><br />
Issue 66, November – December 2024
</div>
<div style="margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: 1.2em;">
* Les Jours and East View Press join the library
* Tech tip: Newspapers.com
<big>''']'''</big>
</div>
</div>
<small>Sent by ] on behalf of The Misplaced Pages Library team --17:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Samwalton9 (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Recipients&oldid=28051347 -->

Latest revision as of 17:33, 10 January 2025

Archiving icon

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 30 sections are present.
FYI:

Copyright issue?

If you are coming to open a discussion with me because I reverted an edit of yours as a copyright issue, please make sure your post includes a link to the article in question - not just the name of the article, a link. Then read the following:

I typically use an edit summary with "copyright issue re URL", or "cv URL". The URL identifies source material that matches your edit too closely.

Copy Within Misplaced Pages If you added material to an article which came from an existing article in Misplaced Pages, it is highly likely that this will be flagged as a potential copyright violation in our CopyPatrol software.

If you followed the best practices at Misplaced Pages:Copying_within_Wikipedia, you left an edit summary indicating the source, I will mark it as acceptable, and you are probably not reading this message. On the other hand, if you did not identify what you did in an edit summary, then I probably reverted the edit. However, the indicated source URL will not be the Misplaced Pages article, it will be be some site that copied from Misplaced Pages. (As a technical point, this is not a false positive because failing to follow best practices means that the attribution requirements have not been followed.) If the edit has been revision deleted, let me know so I can reverse it and you can provide the proper attribution. If it was not revision deleted but simply reverted, feel free to undo my revert, explaining carefully in the edit summary why you are doing so and add the proper attribution.

Other issues There are other reasons why your edit may have been reverted in error. I do a lot of reviews of flagged issues. In 1 to 2% of the cases, I do make a mistake and I'm happy to rectify it. Some sources of errors:

  • Source page which has a full copyright notice at the bottom of the page but material within the page is properly licensed. Sometimes that license is buried in the page and sometimes on a separate page.
  • Source material that is public domain but not clearly identified as such.
  • Source material that is properly licensed but I somehow failed to notice the license
In any of these cases, politely let me know and I will remedy this situation as quickly as possible.

April editathons at Women in Red

January 2020 at Women in Red

January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153


Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Copyright violations on Chartered Institutes for the Management of Sport and Physical Activity

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Chartered_Institute_for_the_Management_of_Sport_and_Physical_Activity

Thank you for flagging the copyright violation. I agree with the removal. However, there was other content that was removed that did not come from the website you flagged. This included infobox additions, a new section, and other text in the introduction not related to the vision/mission paragraphs.

I have reintroduced these elements onto the page. I will leave mission/vision absent.

COI on my profile. Happy to add elsewhere if needed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Reece_at_CIMSPA

While it may not seem like the right thing to do, it is convention, when identifying a copyright issue, to do a rollback, which sometimes picks up other copyright issues and sometimes picks up inrelated,a nd non-problematic issues. You are always welcome to restore the non-copyright issue edits.

••••🎄Merry Christmas🎄••••

"May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ..Merry Christmas.. and a ..Happy New Year.., whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you ..warm greetings.. for Christmas and New Year 2021."

Happy editing,
User:245CMR

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red November 2024

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 65

The Misplaced Pages Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

  • Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Misplaced Pages Library
  • Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
  • Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Misplaced Pages Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Smiley award!!!! :D

For your contributions to Misplaced Pages and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award.
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

Ame ★ (talk) 21:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks!
I've been much less active for the last couple years but posts like this inspire me to try to do better. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
youre welcome!! I'm glad they inspire you 😸❤️ Ame ★ (talk) 16:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Sphilbrick

It's a joy to see your username back on the CopyPatrol list! DanCherek (talk) 04:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! S Philbrick(Talk) 12:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Draft:2010 Albert Lea tornado

Just to let you know, the "all-caps" material was from the National Weather Service (see source linked at bottom), I was rewriting it, since an exact copy of the NWS isn't very encyclopedic. Source is in the public domain, as well. :) EF 14:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

I am aware that the material comes from NOAA which is public domain, but it still needs to be attributed, and unless there is a very good reason , all-caps isn't acceptable. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Well, that's just how they write (see the source). I guess I should have cited it, but I don't have a tool that just "de-caps" everything. Anyways, that's off the point. Since the device I write with is too smll to comfortably do the "double-window" thing with, I just paste the PD material (whether it's caps or not) into the draft, rewrite it, and then delete it. EF 15:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Draft: Daniel P. McCoy

You deleted my draft for Albany County Executive Daniel P. McCoy's page due to "Copyright Infringement" can you please explain the error so I can remedy it? I am new to Misplaced Pages so I understand that I may have formatted it wrong. However, please be aware that I am a representative of his office and have permission to use his official bio and photos from our website. Kevin.albany (talk) 14:22, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

It is not a question of format.
The issue is that this page: Dan McCoy bio is fully copyrighted unless acceptably licensed for use in Misplaced Pages.
You almost certainly other person you claim to be but we don't know that officially, and we can't take you word for it.
There is a process for providing a license for that site so that it can be used by Misplaced Pages.
There is a link:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/Commons:Email_templates
See WP:COI
For going that route, please be aware that if you are a representative of his office then you have a conflict of interest issue and should not be editing a page about him.
Sorry for the bureaucracy but it's necessary.
Here's a link to a page specifically designed for new editors to ask questions. Misplaced Pages:Teahouse
I urge you to post there, explain your position relative to Daniel McCoy, and I am fairly certain you will get advice that discourages you from writing such an article. That's without even addressing the question of copyright. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Tom D. O'Malley - draft versus sanbox

Hello Sphilbrick - I have a quick question regarding the best location on wiki to develop draft articles.

Background: I am developing what will be a very comprehensive article on Tom O'Malley (the founder of the modern independent refining industry). I grabbed parts of a relatively weak (and 25-year-old stale article from Encyclopedia.com) as a starting framework. My article will be 5-10x as long as the starting point and probably have >100 references. However, while it was sitting in draft mode (for literally minutes) without being submitted under AfC, and without its citations, a bot picked up the similarity with encyclopedia.com (which surprised me given that it was a draft as patrolling drafts seems a bit odd). I then cut the text out and put it into my sandbox - leaving the draft space empty but did not delete the draft shell as I plan to repopulate when the article is more mature.

The sandbox does not appear to be bot-patrolled (please disabuse me if this is wrong).

I have run into similar issues when I bring in a large new article from MS Word all at once and save before the citations have been completed (in draft mode). Should all of this work be done in the sandbox versus the draft space? This seems a bit counterintuitive to me. thank you

here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Tom_D._O%27Malley

Refineryguycanada (talk) 18:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

I believe the sandbox is patrolled. It must be as I occasionally see it pop up in the notifications of potential copyright issues. Neither the draft space nor the sandbox are acceptable places for starting articles if your approach is to bring in copyrighted information and then clean it up. While I personally think that's never a desirable editing approach, I get that sometimes people do it that way. If you choose to work that way, it must be done off-line.
Material in draft space and in sandbox space doesn't have to fully meet final editing standards such as formatting or even complete citations, but it can never ever have copyrighted text other than the obvious exceptions (short excerpts as block quotes or within quotation marks) S Philbrick(Talk) 20:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Ok - thanks for the heads up. Refineryguycanada (talk) 17:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red December 2024

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Deleted without courtesy warning.

Please revert the deletion of draft article at Draft:The-Corruption-of-economics and let me delete the the copyright offensive material. This is going to be my first article.

I did not realise that a public description of a book on Amazon is subject to copyright.

Thank you,

Janos Abel Janosabel (talk) 21:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

With rare exceptions, everything you add to an article should be in your own words. Some of the exceptions include short quotes with the material is in a block quote or marked with quote marks and attributed. Other exceptions include public domain text which is properly attributed. My guess is some people are confused with the term public domain and think that things found in public websites constitute public domain. If that's your assumption it is quite incorrect.
My recollection is that there was not much of value beyond the copyrighted material in the draft article I deleted so I'm declining to restore it. S Philbrick(Talk) 22:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation.
So is there no way to write an article now for that book?
Harsh regime to enforce. I was not allowed to correct an error due to misunderstanding or insufficient competency.
There is plenty of value and noteworthiness I can put into that article during the weeks to come. Janosabel (talk) 23:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
I decided to take a second look on the chance that I misremembered the contents. Here's the entire contents of the article excluding the copyrighted portion:
A book by Fred Harrison and Mason Gaffney edition published in 2023 by Shepheard-Walwyn. S Philbrick(Talk) 00:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for this second chance. Teaches me to be more careful about rules. Janosabel (talk) 17:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Requesting undeletion

Dear Sir, I noticed that my recent article Draft:Krishna Hari Pushkar was speedily deleted due to copyright infringement. I sincerely apologize for this oversight and kindly request you to consider restoring the article temporarily, so I can remove the infringing content and improve it in compliance with Misplaced Pages's guidelines.

Thank you for your time and understanding. Gauravs 51 (talk) 14:27, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Sorry that's not an option. I can and did email you the contents although it was unbelievably painful due to the convoluted history of this article S Philbrick(Talk) 14:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Sir, can I rewrite and rectify my mistakes ? @Sphilbrick Gauravs 51 (talk) 14:49, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Sure. I sent the contents of the deleted draft to you by email. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Many Thanks !! Gauravs 51 (talk) 15:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Lake Pape

As a new wikipedia editor, I am guaranteed to mess up, and I would appreciate some advise on adding information and sources to stubs or any article as I am not sure what is against the copyright rules. On the Lake Pape article you reversed my additions but I am not sure why it broke copyright rules, thank you for understanding my good intentions. BigBlobfish (talk) 00:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for asking so politely. I'm sure it can be jarring when you're trying to make good faith improvements to an article and find they been removed.
Look at your first sentence of the biodiversity section:
Lake Pape is rich in organic matter and is classed as a mesotrophic lake on the Trophic state index.
Now check out this site and look at the first sentence of the biodiversity section:
Lake Pape is rich in organic matter - a mesotrophic lake.
That sentence is a close call, and had it simply been that sentence I would've let it go. However, look at your second sentence:
There are sharp-leaf plants growing on the shores and bays of the lake.
And now the second sentence of the site:
There are sharp-leaf plants growing on the shores and bays of the lake.
There are several additional sentences, some identical, some close paraphrases.
The next issue is whether the source issue is acceptably licensed so that it could be used (with attribution course)
Many sites include a footer with the copyright status of the site. In this case, there is no such indication at the bottom of the page, nor is there at the bottom of the main page. Occasionally, I will run across editors who think the absence of a copyright statement means there is no copyright. While that was true many decades ago, the law was changed and the default assumption is that material is subject to full copyright even if there is no particular notice. There are some exceptions such as material created by US federal employees in the course of their employment, but that doesn't apply here.
The site appears to be associated with the country Latvia. While I have not memorized the copyright laws in every country, many countries are part of the Berne Convention. Latvia has been a signatory since 1995. See also Latvia The Berne Convention states that material is automatically subject to copyright as opposed to requiring a specific indication. (This is a casual summary. ) If you have information suggesting that this site is public domain, please let me know. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for such a kind response. But does this mean I can't use the information from the site or does this mean I just have to write in my own words? BigBlobfish (talk) 13:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
You can use the information, in fact you should use it as a reference, but you should write it in your own words. I urge you to read close paraphrase. Some editors were under the impression that as long as they change a few words here and there will not be an exact copy which is correct, the key issue is whether it's essentially the same thing. This can be tricky as your goal is to make the same point. Good practice is not to copy a sentence and then try to change it, but read the whole site and ideally some other relevant site, and then write your own summary. When done, take a look at the original source on the chance your memory is so good you managed to largely reproduce it. Good luck, and thanks for your interest in contributing. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the assistance and support! BigBlobfish (talk) 13:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

What's the point of contributing?

I just edited Bedinvetmab to add the MOA which is missing. I pulled the info from the manufacturers prescribing information - i.e. the primary source and my edit was removed because of copyright violations? This is my first contribution to Misplaced Pages and based on this experience likely my last. Diegoarey (talk) 17:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

I hope you will reconsider.
The early edits of many new contributors arise because they read an article, realize some important information is missing, go out and find that information and add that information copying and pasting from the original source, not realizing that this is almost always a violation of copyright policy.
Contributing to Misplaced Pages is a little bit harder than some realize, because it means you have to write the information in your own words (with some rare exceptions such as identified short quotes, and material from some public domain sources.)
We want material added to Misplaced Pages articles to be reliable and while it might seem obvious that the words written by the actual manufacturer would be the best source, that's not necessarily the case. Manufacturers have a potential conflict of interest. One hopes they write factually and unbiased but one can't be sure, which is why we like to support additions to articles with citations to reliable sources that is places that have a reputation for being unbiased.
You asked about the point of contributing. The point is that when done correctly, Misplaced Pages can serve as a source of information which is as free of bias is we as a community can manage. All done by volunteers and free to the public. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Makes sense on one hand, on the other hand, if the point is to fact check because "while it might seem obvious that the words written by the actual manufacturer would be the best source, that's not necessarily the case. Manufacturers have a potential conflict of interest." then I would have expected the community to edit what I wrote if it's factually incorrect rather than delete it. Diegoarey (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
There are two issues which relate to two of the five pillers of Misplaced Pages. Misplaced Pages:Five_pillars
The second pillar:
Misplaced Pages is written from a neutral point of view
Is why we have concerns about accepting material from the manufacturer without question. That's why we push for "citations based on reliable sources" in sources with a conflict of interest which aren't viewed as reliable. That doesn't totally exclude the use of information from a manufacturer. For example a statement such as "according to the manufacturer, lorem Ipsum..." Might be acceptable if it's clear that the words are not in Misplaced Pages's voice and should be taken with a grain of salt.
The second issue relates to the third pillar:
Misplaced Pages is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute
That means we need to "respect copyright laws and never plagiarize from any sources". S Philbrick(Talk) 18:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Copy of an article

could you provide a copie of the article Reign of Righteousness Kharavela Deva (talk) 13:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Sent to your email address S Philbrick(Talk) 13:50, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Not visible. Regards,Ved Sharma (talk) 11:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
What does that mean? S Philbrick(Talk) 13:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2025

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your revert at Kasaya_(clothing)

Your revert reinstated numerous errors. Why?

  • I left you a message there on Talk, where your reasons for your unsupported revert should have been noted.
  • I provided a reliable source for the simplest corrections of the original history of Buddhist robes, when the numerous errors were completely unsourced, those multiple errors your revert reinstated - on New Year's Eve, of all inappropriate times.

Metokpema (talk) 09:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

I responded at your talk page. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Courland Uprising

Hello. You deleted my edits on Draft:Courland Uprising, destroying my hard work. I would like to politely ask you to send me text you deleted, so I can rewritte it and get back to working on my article :) I know that your bot flagged it as "copywritted", but it was just a quote from a newspaper, I pasted so I could use its informations in the article. It obviously wasn't intended to be in the final version. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm puzzled that you say it was "just a quote from a newspaper". That's exactly what is meant by violation of copyright rules. It is permitted to use short quotes if enclosed in quotation marks or set off as a block quote and if they are properly sourced neither of which apply here.
You seem to be under the impression that it's okay to have copyrighted material in a draft. It is not. It's never a good practice to start with copyrighted material and massage it but if you must, do it in an off-line editor.
My reversion may have picked up otherwise acceptable edits because it's standard practice to revert all consecutive edits by the same editor. I can send you the material but you need to turn on your email option in your preferences so that I can send it to you via email. Alternatively, and more easily for you, I turned off the code which hides the edits so you can recover the edits yourself. Let me know when you are done so I can turn back on the revision deletion code. S Philbrick(Talk) 00:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Issue Regarding Khawaspur Page

Hii @Sphilbrick , Thanks for letting me about my mistakes regarding Copyright issue. i should repharse it on my own words. i will surely keep in mind for further editing in future. Apart from this , This khawaspur page is totally mistaken to Pakistan which is totally wrong. there is nothing like khawaspur village or Ropur district in Pakistan. Also there is no any citation in page that support it a village in Pakistan. Only one citation is there which say it's in India. Also i checked all contribution history also , editors also claim that this page has many mistakes. So allow me to do a revision of this whole page. i surely will provide a reputable citation for it. I will again keep in mind about copyright issues matter.

Much Regards Callmehelper (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. Callmehelper (talk) 20:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Go for it. I agree, it seems clear it is in India, so a complete overhaul is warranted. S Philbrick(Talk) 22:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

added Sennecaster
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Worm That Turned
removed Ferret

Oversight changes

added
readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Mischgerät (V-2 guidance computer) Copyright Reversion

For the article Mischgerät (V-2 guidance computer) at URL "https://en.wikipedia.org/Mischgerät_(V-2_guidance_computer)":

On 20:14, 7 January 2025, you had noted "Copyright issue re https://engineering.stackexchange.com/questions/49950/is-there-a-schematic-of-hoeltzers-mischger%c3%a4t-v2-a4-electronic-guidance-computer/50286"

First off, my bad, in that I 1) was using the Misplaced Pages entry as a text editor for the draft, rather than my sandbox, and 2) didn't promptly add cites.

I'm the author for the referenced StackExchange question and accepted answer. As I noted on that platform, I machine translated and lightly edited some German language passages from the document "Das Gerät A4 Baureihe B Gerätbeschreibung", downloaded originally from http://www.aggregat4.de/pdf/Gerätebeschreibung_A4.pdf, but since then from https://archive.org/download/technicaldescriptionA4/Gerätebeschreibung_A4_text.pdf

Based on my understanding of German copyright law I've gathered within Misplaced Pages regarding Public Domain material, I believe the material in the source PDF is PD in both Germany and the US, based on a lack of a named author, and that it was published a few days short of 80 years ago.

While the very lightly edited machine translation was adequate for my purposes on StackExchange, it needs a complete rewrite in my own words for easier comprehension on Misplaced Pages, which was what I was in the midst of.

Was the copyright issue due to similarity with the StackExchange entry, or status of the source document? If the former, it would be helpful - but not critical - to retrieve my draft of the "Operation" section of the "Mischgerät" article.

If the latter, I'd appreciate guidance on how best to "adjudicate" what would apparently be differing opinions on whether I'm working with PD material or not. Cmholm (talk) 23:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

I didn't notice that it was that old which would make it PD. I believe SR copyright notice on the page but that might not have applied to the material in question.
I see that you've had a number of consecutive edits and have edited after I did the reversion so it's not perfectly clear how best to proceed.
The simplest approach (admittedly for me) is for me to say I'm sorry I missed the underlying material was PD, and let you recover as best you can. Alternatively I can undo my reversion but I think that will mess up edits you've made subsequent to my reversion. S Philbrick(Talk) 23:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
In anticipation that reversion would make a mess, I've backed up my current work off-line. If you're willing to undo the revision, I'll copy that to an off-line source and paste the current work back in. Cmholm (talk) 00:11, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I've restored it to the version before my reversion. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Reviewing other copyright pleas on this page, I now realize I should have been drafting articles off-line from the get-go, rather than piling up my references and just jumping in. Cmholm (talk) 00:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I applaud you for your initiative to read other examples of editors involved in copyright issues.
I agree that working off-line is considered a best practice, but we also have a guideline urging you to Misplaced Pages:Bold
Don't feel that you have to do all of your work off-line. Ideally, after any edit, the article should stand on its own. In the early years of Misplaced Pages some people used to put up "under construction" templates to indicate that an article was in the process of transformation but that practice is less common today. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
No worries. I'll work to make sure an edit will stand on its own and be cited before leaving it for the night, unlike the revision under discussion! :) Cmholm (talk) 14:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 66

The Misplaced Pages Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 66, November – December 2024

  • Les Jours and East View Press join the library
  • Tech tip: Newspapers.com

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Misplaced Pages Library team --17:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)