| Revision as of 10:13, 23 January 2015 editCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators73,478 edits →Arbitration clarification request closed: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:49, 27 March 2015 edit undoTheobald Tiger (talk | contribs)1,164 edits ←Replaced content with '{{Retired|date=March 2015}}' | ||
| (65 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Retired|date=March 2015}} | |||
| == Vindication == | |||
| Thought you might be interested in seeing Josq's comments at the ] page, which basically indicate that you were actually doing good and welcome productive work on the Landmark content. If you have any interest in returning at any time, I hope you know that, basically, your name has been cleared in this matter. ] (]) 16:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| *And I saw on the Dutch wiki you were unblocked by good old {{U|Wikiklaas}}. ] (]) 19:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration clarification request closed == | |||
| This is a courtesy message to inform you that an arbitration ] in which you were listed as a party has been closed and archived with a motion being enacted which authorises ] for the topic of ], broadly construed. For the Arbitration Committee, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 10:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC) | |||