| Revision as of 18:41, 16 February 2015 editJeppiz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,031 edits reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:15, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,139,207 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | This is my rather skimpy talk page. Please add something brilliant or at least reasonable if you'd like. . . ] (]) 06:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == My opening gambit == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello Renejs, | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| I have developed over the years, in my OT/Hebrew Scripture historical studies, a decidedly radical minimalist approach and position. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 --> | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| I have been following with interest the developments here in NT (with an eye for trying to feel the possible impact that OT minimalism can have in NT), and since you have just mentioned Lemche's and Thompson's supposed professional predicament in Kopenhagen, I thought I could ask you: | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Renejs. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| What would they have to fear, in terms of their academic positions and reputations, by pushing more overtly for the establishment of an NT minimalist current, at least in Europe? | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| Since this would all really fall under the rubric of a personal conversation ("eye-to-eye" as much as possible in written digital communications) about academic politics and epistemological strategies, feel free, if you are so inclined, to just reply to my email directly, through my own user page, where on the Tools menu on the left side you should see the option "Email this user." I was looking for this option here on your page, but I couldn't see/find it. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Best regards, ] ] 19:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/17&oldid=750571901 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| == February 2015 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, '''breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]'''. | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-ew --> ]] (]) 06:52, 15 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Renejs. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| :You're wikilawyering, Anselm --''Using the rules in a manner contrary to their principles in order to "win" editing disputes is highly frowned upon by the Misplaced Pages community.'' I do one revert and you yell "Block him!" That's pretty revealing, since you've been the most active recent reverter/editor. BTW, Dawkins BLP has no relevance. There's no problem with sourcing his material which is entirely factual. Obviously, you simply don't like is his ''position''. That's POV. ] (]) 15:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::No, you're ], Renejs. You're here to ] you keep ] ] to ], while ] -- ]. ] (]) 17:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == ANI notification == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 19:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/09&oldid=866998319 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| I am frankly astonished at the trumped up developments. . . Of course, I am not "socking" anybody. I do not have multiple accounts. I barely know what "socking" is. I am writing this here because I have been blocked from input on the ANI page. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| Jeppiz is a loose cannon. He has engineered two ANI's against me in two months--both without cause. Now I have been blocked from editing but the accusation (socking) against me is ridiculous and groundless. I have also been accused of "edit warring" though my recent editing has been benign--only two reverts in two days (fewer than Jeppiz, St. Anselm, and Gekritzl) and several notes on the talk page showing my interest in forming a consensus. I am being deprived of my wiki voice. This is harassment. There need to be disciplinary actions against those who are maliciously harassing me and now, especially, trumping up charges of "socking." That is very serious. I suggest a topic ban against Jeppiz for malicious and false accusations, or perhaps a global wiki ban. He is a disservice to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 17:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == February 2015 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''36 hours''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] 19:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|decline=No reason given for unblock request. <s>Extending block to 2 weeks for block evasion through ].</s> ] ] 10:28, 16 February 2015 (UTC)|reason=Your reason here ] (]) 05:20, 16 February 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
| </div> | |||
| Hello adminstrators. All I did was ask for a reason for St. Anselm's multiple reverts (more reverts than me!) of the ENTIRE section "Richard Dawkins" in the CMT. | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| Why are you blocking me? You should be blocking users who ''arbitrarily'' edit huge segments of content ''without'' reason. . . | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| Another thing: I have reverted less than St. Anselm. Why am "I" being blocked here? I am allowed 3 reverts per day. I have used two reverts in two days. And they are for good cause: I'm demanding a reason for the wholesale removal of important material. That's damn good wiki behavior. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| It's people who remove huge swathes of material without reason who should be blocked from editing. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Here's hoping you guys do a better job in future, because I still hold out some hope for Misplaced Pages. But it's getting pretty slim. . . You guys are caving to numbers and not considering facts or article quality. | |||
| </div> | |||
| Thanks, | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
| ⚫ | ] (]) |
||
| <s>'''Note to reviewing admin''' Renejs is socking to evade the block .</s>] (]) 10:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}'''Further note to reviewing admin''' - Jeppiz is mistaken. I am not René Salm and have no connection with him (indeed, I have long thought he should be topic-banned if not completely banned for his highly tendentious editing, his blatant NPOV violations and his long history of making personal attacks on other editors who dare to go with things like facts and the evidence rather than his 'faith of the heart' approach). I'm also personally less than flattered at being compared to a notorious pseudoscholar and religious zealot like Salm, whose work bears about as much relationship to historical reality as the average novel by Philippa Gregory (in some cases maybe rather less).] (]) 13:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks for pointing this out. I can see now that the opinions proposed by you and by Renejs hardly match, so the charge of socking and block evasion appears to have been mistaken. ] ] 15:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| I am frankly astonished at the trumped up developments. . . Of course, I am not "socking" anybody. I do not have multiple accounts. I barely know what "socking" is. I am writing this here because I have been blocked from input on the ANI page. | |||
| Jeppiz is a loose cannon. He has engineered two ANI's against me in two months--both without cause. Now I have been blocked from editing but the accusation (socking) against me is ridiculous and groundless. I have also been accused of "edit warring" though my recent editing has been benign--only two reverts in two days (fewer than Jeppiz, St. Anselm, and Gekritzl) and several notes on the talk page showing my interest in forming a consensus. I am being deprived of my wiki voice. This is harassment. There need to be disciplinary actions against those who are maliciously harassing me and now, especially, trumping up charges of "socking." That is very serious. I suggest a topic ban against Jeppiz for malicious and false accusations, or perhaps a global wiki ban. He is a disservice to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 17:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :How charming. However, this "loose cannon" contacted the admin who first blocked you to verify you're not the IP and to reverse the lengthening of your block, and posted on ANI that your block should be shortened. I'm pleased to see it has been. I've started one ANI about you, not two. As for me being a disservice to Misplaced Pages, it's a subjective opinion so hard to say much. I happen to believe in science and academia and defend science against blind beliefs, whichever form they take. It does lead to accusations much worse than yours, including Palestinians calling me *** Jew, Israelis calling me a *** Arab, some Uzbek users calling me c*cksu**ing Tajik and so on. People with extreme opinions who are here to right great wrongs are hard to please.] (]) 18:23, 16 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Why was I blocked in the first place? You write that you believe in "science and academia," but you can't even see facts because you've edit warred more than me and yet once again contrive an ANI against me for that reason. So, you're a hypocrite on top of a bully--and, whether you agree or not--very POV (because this is ultimately all content based and you know it). You just need to get off my back. You're an ANI candidate for harassment. ] (]) 18:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :You call me a "loose canon", "a hypocrite", "a bully", "malicious", "a disservice to Misplaced Pages", and you then say I'm the one harassing. I've started one ANI about you. I've commented when another was started. I've stated you're a single purpose account, which is entirely uncontroversial based on your edit history, and I've said that you have a strong conflict of interest, which also is entirely uncontroversial.] (]) 18:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:15, 19 November 2024
This is my rather skimpy talk page. Please add something brilliant or at least reasonable if you'd like. . . Renejs (talk) 06:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Renejs. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Renejs. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)