| Revision as of 04:26, 20 July 2006 editTony Fox (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,644 edits →Warren Kinsella: - spread the joy around← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:49, 4 September 2011 edit undoMC10 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers26,589 edits ←Redirected page to User:Crzrussian | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| <center>This user is going to be on Wikibreak<br>until his life permits him to return.<br>User talk will be checked<br>but if you see him editing too much<br>please slap him or something.</center> | |||
| ---- | |||
| <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px black; background-color: yellow;"><center>''' and I will respond on your talk page.'''</center></div><br> | |||
| '''Archives of Old Comments:''' | |||
| ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| == Outstanding user page == | |||
| Crzrussian, you have an outstanding user page. Very clean, neat - one of the best that I have seen. It seems a majority of userpages I have come across are filled with nothing but ''Userboxes''. There should be some sort of award for user page neatness. I would vote for yours. I am now inspired to work on mine. Cheers! ] <small>]/]</small> 21:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ] requested that ] be deleted, with no argumentation and no apparent reason. I removed the deletion notice. Just for your info. --] 22:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Oops, it's ]. --] 10:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| You have a very low threshhold of ruling. Considering that it's treyf, and that my only exposure has been driving past stores and passing by in airports, the article seems to be a reasonable facsimile of what the chain is about. Between what was on the website (and in the copyvio version), the 10-K report and my recollections, I was able to cobble something in about ten minutes. All in a day's wiki work. ] 02:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I keep on considering filing an RfA, and the more I see the less benefit I think I'd get from it. I edit actively on all things New Jersey-related, on a 4,000-item watchlist, and that more than keeps me busy. Please let me know if I can help with anything. ] 02:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == adminship question == | |||
| how long did it take you to become an administrator? ] 05:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==''Signpost'' updated for July 17th== | |||
| ] | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | '''Volume 2, Issue 29''' || align ="center" | '''] ]''' || align="right" | | |||
| ''']''' | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 align=center | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| {| align="center" cellspacing="20" width=90% | |||
| || ] | |||
| || ] | |||
| |- | |||
| || ] | |||
| || ] | |||
| |- | |||
| || ] | |||
| || ] | |||
| |- | |||
| || ] | |||
| || | |||
| |} | |||
| <!-- | |||
| {| align="center" cellspacing="5" | |||
| |colspan=3| '''<font color=brown>Recent and Upcoming Events</font>''' | |||
| |- | |||
| | cellspacing="15" | <small><font color=DarkGreen>May 16</font>Wikimedia ]</small> | |||
| | cellspacing="15" | <small><font color=DarkGreen>May 19</font> --</small> | |||
| <small><font color=DarkGreen>May 21</font> Tentative start of Board elections</small> | |||
| <small><font color=DarkGreen>May 22</font> --</small> | |||
| | cellspacing="15" | <small><font color=DarkGreen>May 25</font> Wikimania abstract deadline</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| --> | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | ] | ] | ] | ] | |||
| | align = "right" | <span class="plainlinks"></span> <small>] : ]</small> | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.</small> --] 05:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == If you're floating around == | |||
| Check your e-mail. ]] 11:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==You have a lot of nerve== | |||
| Saying I "vandalized" pages. I edited the Warren Kinsella page and noted on your discussion re: Yanksox sysop application that i would not support him because you are supporting him. I have no faith in your ability as a Wiki admin. I certainly do not see you as someone who respects free spech rights. I have followed you as you have constantly abused your power as a Misplaced Pages editor in the various causes you have adopted. | |||
| Go ahead and block me for speaking out. ] 16:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == rawr to you too! == | |||
| ] Thanks for the compliment on my sig =) ] ] ] 16:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Co-nom== | |||
| Let me know if you think anything should be changed. ] 17:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| OK now? ] 17:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Edits-Per-Page Ratio == | |||
| CrazyRussian, I recently found myself on RfA after assisting in the mechanics of a particular nom. I was browsing the RfAs and came across a comment by you in Centrx's RfA in which you brought up the issue of the edits-per-page ratio. I'm just curious — as someone whose ratio is currently 3.317 according to Interiot's javascript tool, what do you see as the downside of a high edits-per-page ratio? — ] <span class="plainlinks">(</span> • ]) 18:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi again. You may have misunderstood me — I didn't mean the question in the practical sense, as I don't really know enough about Centrx to cast a vote one way or the other. I meant it more in the theoretical sense, as in whether you do in fact see a downside to a high edits-per-page ratio? I ask only because as I browsed, I saw people's reactions to that particular number and was wondering whether I might run into problems myself. I'm a bit of a perfectionist and I often want to tweak something if I do a typo or figure out a better wording later — this boosts up my ratio, it seems. — ] <span class="plainlinks">(</span> • ]) 18:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the response: I appreciate the insight. I have to admit, I had always wondered what safeguards existed to prevent someone from doing a lot of small unsubtantial edits in order to rack up their edit count. My own edit count's gone up to nearly 4k since I've been doing some AfD work and such, but with a 3.3 ratio, that's probably not as impressive as it could be, then. Still, one thought: what if someone has particularly devoted focus on a particular page because of an expertise area (much as I did with ] shortly after my ... ''shudder'' ... infestation last summer)? I suppose that would just then be the purpose of a question such as you asked Centrx, to explain the situation. — ] <span class="plainlinks">(</span> • ]) 18:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == BAFTA == | |||
| Thanks for the welcome! | |||
| 100% proof I cannot find, however there is no proof that they have actually gained a BAFTA. There is very little information on them on the internet, however I have summarised my findings on the ] if you have chance to take a look. I believe it is just information taken out of context. | |||
| Thanks again. ] | ] 20:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Speedys== | |||
| Thanks for the link. I will read it. This is a link to some articles by an editor. They look like db-bios about military service people but after my boo-boo I am afraid to make another mistake. Could you take a look please?--] 21:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ok I am holding on. I know a little about it my dad is a Lt. But what's up?--] 21:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Beaten to the punch== | |||
| By several co noms, and I will have to restrict myself to a strong support. -- ] <small>]</small> 23:50, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Navy bios== | |||
| You are right, I should not have been so quick to make assumptions about those navy biography articles. I should have also contacted the user who created them, and actually thought about doing so, but the user had simply copied and pasted the articles a few hours before I deleted them, and then left, so I thought he would probably not come back, and in fact he has not come back. However, I will be more careful in the future. Good luck on improving those articles. ] 03:11, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RFA answer lengthened == | |||
| Thank you for voting in my RFA. As per your objections, I have lengthened my answer to question number one. Cheers and happy editing, ]]] ] 04:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == R these crossover articles? == | |||
| I recently found these articles, that, in my opinion, "crossover" or overlap each other: | |||
| ] - which i think should be deleted, because it is not a complete article and... | |||
| ] - which contains an actual list. | |||
| What do you think, should one of them be deleted? ] 04:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, thats fine ] 04:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Yanksox RfA== | |||
| Please see the talk page for this. ] 13:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Rosh yeshivas== | |||
| Hi Crz, please see | |||
| Many thanks, ] 14:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==ndash== | |||
| Hi Crz, hope I haven't aroused your ire. You see, I used to put a "-" between dates, but then I saw a certain user, I believe it was ], who put these strange "<nowiki>–</nowiki>" between the dates to produce a longer, and some would say nicer line. I had absolutely no idea what it was about, but figured it was wikipedia protocol or something, couldn't do much harm and actually made the line look better. I see you've got other ideas. Please direct me as to how to proceed. Many thanks, ] 15:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| PS: I can't seem to get the <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki>'s to work, but you get the idea. | |||
| == cat:antisemitic people == | |||
| please don't use WP as a soap-box. Anti-zionism, controversial opinions != anti-semitism. Please stop populating that awful category ASAP. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 17:38, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : That seems to be the inclusion criteria used, if we have a source calling the person an anti-Semite he/she goes into the category. According to ] in ] we don't even need a source. Feel free to join the discussion at ] if you have any ideas. // ] | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Check my addition to the section 'Aftermath.' Others will probably try to delete it ASAP since it doesn't fit their picture of poor Arabs who have nothing but rocks which they only use to attack soldiers in tanks. They don't want to see anything being published about a sniper killing an innocent baby girl. So I figured you might want to watch it also. --] 19:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == *SLAPS* == | |||
| Hello, I noticed you posted | |||
| "This user is going to be on Wikibreak | |||
| until his life permits him to return. | |||
| User talk will be checked | |||
| but if you see him editing too much | |||
| please slap him or something." on your page. | |||
| You are editing tons. Shall I slap you with a haddock?--] 20:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Naughty! Is there something keeping you here you'd like help with? (PS I nicked your yellow bar thing because it rocks - sorry) --] 20:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Admins == | |||
| Hey just a technical question... admins get assigned users to monitor or articles to monitor? ] 20:48, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Leave us alone. == | |||
| Dear Russian guy, | |||
| We object to the deletion of "The History of Bad Parties" and think that you should concentrate on other apects of your life(maybe your personality) and stop investing your time into deleting peoples articles. | |||
| We had spent quite a bit of time composing that article and we found it to be very relevant to today's society. Maybe you could learn from our article as we are sure you are the type of person that would host a bad party, we are doing YOU a favour! | |||
| Our article was not composed with the intention to provide comic relief. It was merely posted to be informative and educational for potential readers. | |||
| We also are angered by the comment you left us. We refuse to be treated in such a hostile manner. Please consider being a decent human being when leaving comments for wikipedia users, as this might aid your social skills. | |||
| Please leave our future articles alone as we have no intention to delete, edit or tamper in any way with yours. | |||
| Regards, | |||
| Steph and Mj. | |||
| == Warren Kinsella == | |||
| There is an edit war occuring in ] still - you recently semi-protected the article, though it appears full protection may be necessary as ] and ] still aren't getting along too well. Thanks. <font color="DarkGreen">]</font><sup>]</sup> 03:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| That's rich, accusing Arthur Ellis of "privacy violations" when you continually allow people to "out" him, including today on the Kinsella page. | |||
| I believe he is taking moves to deal with you directly, in person, and not through your assumed identity on Misplaced Pages.] 03:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Looks like I missed a busy evening here. Marie, I assume, is referring to ]. Sorry if my intuition is wrong there Marie. --] 03:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Going insane, right about now!! - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 04:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::As a sideline viewer of that mess, I'd suggest inviting some other admins to join the fun. It needs it. ] <small>]</small> 04:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:49, 4 September 2011
Redirect to: