Misplaced Pages

Foundations of Geopolitics: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:21, 6 March 2015 editVolunteer Marek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers94,173 edits Undid revision 650199620 by 92.16.247.138 (talk)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:05, 10 January 2025 edit undoGoszei (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors87,251 edits MOS:BOLDTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 
(294 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1997 geopolitical book by Aleksandr Dugin}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{refimprove|date=April 2010}}
{{one source|date=April 2010}}
}}

{{Infobox book {{Infobox book
| name = The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia | name = The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia
| author = ]
| title_orig = Основы геополитики (геополитическое будущее России) / Osnovy geopolitiki: Geopoliticheskoe budushchee Rossii
| language = ]
| country = ]
| genre =
| publisher = Arktogeja
| isbn = 978-5-8592-8019-3
| title_orig = Основы геополитики
| orig_lang_code = ru
| translator = | translator =
| image = | image = FoundationsGeopolitics.jpg
| caption = | caption = Russian edition cover
| author = ]
| illustrator = | illustrator =
| cover_artist = | cover_artist =
| country = Russia
| language = ]
| series = | series =
| subject = | subject =
| genre =
| publisher =
| release_date = 1997 | release_date = 1997
| english_release_date = | english_release_date =
| media_type = | media_type =
| pages = | pages =
| isbn = | oclc =
| oclc=
| preceded_by = | preceded_by =
| followed_by = | followed_by =
}} }}
{{Eurasianism}}
'''''The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia''''' is a ] book by ]. The book has had a large influence within the Russian military, police, and statist foreign policy elites<ref name="dunlop"/> and is used as a textbook in the ] of Russian military.<ref name="dunlop">{{cite web | url=http://www.4pt.su/en/content/aleksandr-dugin%E2%80%99s-foundations-geopolitics | title=Review: Aleksandr Dugin’s Foundations of Geopolitics | author=John B. Dunlop}}</ref>
'''''The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia''''' ({{langx|ru|Основы геополитики: геополитическое будущее России}}) is a ] book by ]. Its publication in 1997 was well received in ]; it has had significant influence within the ], ], and ],<ref name="HI01">{{cite web|url=http://www.hoover.org/research/russias-new-and-frightening-ism|title=Russia's New—and Frightening—'Ism'|last=Dunlop|first=John B.|date=July 30, 2004|publisher=Hoover Institution|access-date=12 October 2017}}</ref><ref name=Burbank>{{cite news |last=Burbank |first=Jane |date=22 March 2022 |title=The Grand Theory Driving Putin to War |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/22/opinion/russia-ukraine-putin-eurasianism.html? |newspaper=The New York Times |location=New York City |access-date=23 March 2022 |quote=After unsuccessful interventions in post-Soviet party politics, Mr. Dugin focused on developing his influence where it counted — with the military and policymakers. With the publication in 1997 of his 600-page textbook, loftily titled 'The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia,' Eurasianism moved to the center of strategists' political imagination. In Mr. Dugin's adjustment of Eurasianism to present conditions, Russia had a new opponent — no longer just Europe, but the whole of the 'Atlantic' world led by the United States.}}</ref> and has been used as a textbook in the ] of the Russian military.<ref name="HI01"/><ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/27/geopolitics-russia-mackinder-eurasia-heartland-dugin-ukraine-eurasianism-manifest-destiny-putin/|title=The Unlikely Origins of Russia's Manifest Destiny|website=Foreign Policy|date=27 July 2016 |access-date=2017-10-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160727220120/https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/27/geopolitics-russia-mackinder-eurasia-heartland-dugin-ukraine-eurasianism-manifest-destiny-putin/|archive-date=2016-07-27|url-status=live}}</ref> Powerful Russian political figures subsequently took an interest in Dugin,<ref name="Liverant">{{cite journal|last=Liverant|first=Yigal|date=Winter 2009|title=The Prophet of the New Russian Empire|journal=Azure|publisher=Shalem Center|location=Jerusalem|issue=35|issn=0793-6664|url=http://azure.org.il/include/print.php?id=483|access-date=2015-04-06}}</ref> a Russian political analyst who espouses an ] and ] ideology based on his idea of ],<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Shekhovtsov|first1=Anton|last2=Umland|first2=Andreas|title=Is Aleksandr Dugin a Traditionalist? 'Neo-Eurasianism' and Perennial Philosophy|jstor=20621114|journal=]|volume=68|number=4|pages=662–678|date=October 2009|publisher=]|doi=10.1111/j.1467-9434.2009.00544.x}}</ref> who has developed a close relationship with Russia's Academy of the General Staff.<ref name="Lavelle">{{cite book|last=Lavelle|first=Peter|title=Uncovering Russia (excerpt: A civil society without civility)|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0qQixjX1hwoC&q=Gennady+Seleznyov+dugin+-during&pg=PA380|year=2003|publisher=Norasco Publishing|isbn=0972970800|pages=379–380}}</ref>


Dugin credits General Nikolai Klokotov of the Academy of the General Staff as co-author and his main inspiration,<ref name="newsau">{{cite news|url=http://www.news.com.au/world/europe/1990s-manifesto-outlining-russias-plans-is-starting-to-come-true/news-story/343a27c71077b87668f1aa783d03032c|title=1990s Manifesto outlining Russia's plans is starting to come true|last=Firth|first=Charles|date=March 4, 2017|work=news.com.au|access-date=12 October 2017}}</ref> though Klokotov denies this.<ref name=":0"/> Colonel General ], head of the International Department of the ], helped draft the book.<ref name="Mankoff">{{cite book|last=Mankoff|first=Jeffrey|title=Russian Foreign Policy: The Return of Great Power Politics|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SZWk9egC4tUC&q=Foundations+of+Geopolitics+Ivashov&pg=PA69|date=October 17, 2011|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|pages=69–70|isbn=9781442208261}}</ref>
==Use==
The book was co-authored by General ] of the ].<ref name="dunlop"/> Colonel General ], head of the International Department of the ], apparently advised in the project.<ref name="dunlop"/> Klotov stated that in the future the book would "serve as a mighty ideological foundation for preparing a new military command."


==Policy usage==
Dugin has asserted that the book has been adopted as a textbook in many Russian educational institutions.<ref name="dunlop"/>
Klokotov stated that in the future the book would "serve as a mighty ideological foundation for preparing a new military command".<ref name="dunlop">{{cite journal |last=Dunlop |first=John |date=January 31, 2004 |title=Aleksandr Dugin's Foundations of Geopolitics |url=https://www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin%27s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf |journal=] |publisher=Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (George Washington University) |volume=12 |issue=1 |page=41 |issn=1074-6846 |oclc=222569720 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https://www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin's%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf |archive-date=7 June 2016}}</ref> Dugin has asserted that the book has been adopted as a textbook in many Russian educational institutions.<ref name="HI01"/> Former speaker of the Russian ], ], for whom Dugin was adviser on geopolitics,<ref name="toal">{{cite book|last=Toal|first=Gerard|title=Near Abroad: Putin, the West and the Contest Over Ukraine and the Caucasus|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vfiSDQAAQBAJ&q=Gennadiy+Seleznyov+foundations+of+geopolitics&pg=PA78|year=2017|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780190253301|page=78}}</ref> "urged that Dugin's geopolitical doctrine be made a compulsory part of the school curriculum".<ref name="dunlop"/>

=== Eurasianist foreign policy doctrine ===
{{Conservatism in Russia|Literature}}
] have been on the rise across Russian society since ] in the country. In a poll conducted by ] in 2021, 64% of Russian citizens identify Russia as a non-European country; while only 29% regarded Russia to be part of Europe.<ref>{{Cite web |date=22 March 2021 |title=Russia and Europe |url=https://www.levada.ru/en/2021/03/22/russia-and-europe/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230501190456/https://www.levada.ru/en/2021/03/22/russia-and-europe/ |archive-date=1 May 2023 |website=Levada Center}}</ref>

In 2023, Russia adopted a Eurasianist, ] ] in a document titled "''The Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation''", approved by ]. The document defines Russia as a "] and a vast ] and Euro-Pacific power" that seeks to create a "Greater Eurasian Partnership" by pursuing close relations with ], ], countries of the ] and the rest of the ] (] and ]). The policy identifies ] and other ] as "the main inspirer, organizer, and executor of the aggressive ] policy of the collective West" and seeks the end of geopolitical ] in the international scene. The document also adopts a ] posture, positioning Russia as the successor state of USSR and calls for spreading "accurate information" about the "decisive contribution of the Soviet Union" in shaping the ] ] and the ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=31 March 2023 |title=Russia adopts new anti-West foreign policy strategy |work=Deutsche Welle |url=https://www.dw.com/en/russia-adopts-new-anti-west-foreign-policy-strategy/a-65198660 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230415103330/https://www.dw.com/en/russia-adopts-new-anti-west-foreign-policy-strategy/a-65198660 |archive-date=15 April 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Gould-Davies |first=Nigel |date=6 April 2023 |title=Russia's new foreign-policy concept: the impact of war |url=https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/online-analysis/2023/04/russia-new-foreign-policy-concept-the-impact-of-war/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230502170222/https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/online-analysis/2023/04/russia-new-foreign-policy-concept-the-impact-of-war/ |archive-date=2 May 2023 |website=IISS}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=1 March 2023 |title=The Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation |url=https://russiaeu.ru/en/news/concept-foreign-policy-russian-federation |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230410161817/https://russiaeu.ru/en/news/concept-foreign-policy-russian-federation |archive-date=10 April 2023 |website=Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the European Union}}</ref>


==Content== ==Content==
In ''Foundations of Geopolitics'', Dugin makes a distinction between "Atlantic" and "Eurasian" societies, which means, as Benjamin R. Teitelbaum describes it: "between societies whose coastal geographical position made them cosmopolitan and landlocked societies oriented toward preservation and cohesion".<ref>{{Cite book|last=Teitelbaum|first=Benjamin R.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QdHADwAAQBAJ|title=War for Eternity: The Return of Traditionalism and the Rise of the Populist Right|date=21 April 2020|publisher=Penguin Books Limited|isbn=978-0-14-199204-4|pages=46|language=en}}</ref> Dugin calls for the "Atlantic societies", primarily represented by the ], to lose their broader geopolitical influence in ], and for Russia to rebuild its influence through annexations and alliances.<ref name=":0"/>
The book declares that "the battle for the world rule of Russians" has not ended and Russia remains "the staging area of a new anti-bourgeois, ]." The Eurasian Empire will be constructed "on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of ], strategic control of the USA, and the refusal to allow ] values to dominate us."<ref name="dunlop" />


The book declares that "the battle for the world rule of Russians" has not ended and Russia remains "the staging area of a new ], ] ]". The Eurasian Empire will be constructed "on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: ], strategic control of the U.S., and the refusal to allow ] to dominate us."<ref name=Burbank/><ref name="dunlop"/> Dugin seems not to rule out the possibility of Russia joining and/or even supporting the ] and ] instrumentally in a pragmatic way of further Western subversion against geopolitical "]".
Military operations play relatively little role. The textbook believes in a sophisticated program of subversion, destabilization, and disinformation spearheaded by the Russian special services. The operations should be assisted by a tough, hard-headed utilization of Russia's gas, oil, and natural resources to bully and pressure other countries.<ref name="dunlop" />


Outside of ] and ], military operations play a relatively minor role except for the ] operations. The textbook advocates a sophisticated program of subversion, destabilization, and ] spearheaded by the ].<ref name=VonDrehle>{{cite news |last=Von Drehle |first=David |date=22 March 2022 |title=The man known as 'Putin's brain' envisions the splitting of Europe — and the fall of China |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/03/22/alexander-dugin-author-putin-deady-playbook/ |newspaper=] |location=] |access-date=22 March 2022 |quote=In his magnum opus, ''The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia'', published in 1997, Dugin mapped out the game plan in detail. ] should foment ], ], and ] within the United States while promoting the ]. In Great Britain, the psy-ops effort should focus on exacerbating ] and ] in ], ], and ].}}</ref> The operations should be assisted by a tough, hard-headed utilization of ], ], and ] to bully and pressure other countries.<ref name="dunlop"/> The book states that "the maximum task is the ']' of all of Europe".<ref name="dunlop" />
The book states that "the maximum task is the ']' of all of Europe".<ref name="dunlop" />


In Europe: In ]:
* ] should be offered the de facto political dominance over most Protestant and Catholic states located within Central and Eastern Europe. ] could be given back to Germany. The book uses the term a "Moscow-Berlin axis".<ref name="dunlop" /> * ] should be offered the '']'' political dominance over most ] located within ]. The ] could be given back to ]. The book uses the term "Moscow–Berlin axis".<ref name="dunlop" />
* ] should be encouraged to form a "Franco-German bloc" with Germany. Both countries have a "firm anti-Atlanticist tradition".<ref name="dunlop" /> * ] should be encouraged to form a bloc with Germany, as they both have a "firm ]".<ref name="dunlop" />
* ] should be cut off from Europe.<ref name="dunlop" /> * The ], merely described as an "extraterritorial floating base of the U.S.", should be cut off from the ].<ref name="dunlop" />
* ] should be absorbed into Russia. Southern Finland will be combined with the ] and northern Finland will be "donated to ]".<ref name="dunlop" /> * ] should be absorbed into Russia. Southern Finland will be combined with the ] and northern Finland will be "donated to ]".<ref name="dunlop"/>
* ] should be given to Germany's sphere of influence.<ref name="dunlop" /> * ] should be given to Germany's ].<ref name="dunlop"/>
* ] and ] should be given a "special status" in the Eurasian-Russian sphere.<ref name="dunlop" /> * ] and ] should be given a "special status" in the Eurasian–Russian sphere, although he later writes that they should be integrated into Russia rather than obtaining national independence.<ref name="dunlop"/>
* ] should be dismembered. ] and "United Ossetia" (which includes Georgia's ] and the ]) will be incorporated into Russia. Georgia's independent policies are unacceptable.<ref name="dunlop" />
* ] should be granted a "special status" in the Eurasian sphere.<ref name="dunlop" />
* ] and ] are to become part of Russia, not independent.<ref name="dunlop"/>
* ], ], "]n Bosnia" and ] – "orthodox collectivist East" – will unite with the "Moscow the ]" and reject the "rational-individualistic West".<ref name="dunlop" />
* ] should be granted a "special status" in the Eurasian sphere. This may involve splitting Poland between German and Russian spheres of influence.<ref name="dunlop"/>
* ] should be annexed by Russia because "Ukraine as an independent state with certain territorial ambitions represents an enormous danger for all of Eurasia and, without resolving the Ukrainian problem, it is in general senseless to speak about continental politics". Ukraine should not be allowed to remain independent, unless it is ], which would be inadmissible.<ref name="dunlop" />
* ], ], ], "]", and ] – "] collectivist East" – will unite with "]" and reject the "rational-individualistic West".<ref name="dunlop"/>
* ] (except Western Ukraine) should be annexed by Russia because "Ukraine as a state has no geopolitical meaning, no particular cultural import or universal significance, no geographic uniqueness, no ethnic exclusiveness, its certain territorial ambitions represents an enormous danger for all of Eurasia and, without resolving the Ukrainian problem, it is in general senseless to speak about continental politics". Ukraine should not be allowed to remain independent, unless it is ], which would be inadmissible according to Western political standards. As mentioned, ] (comprising the regions of ], ], and ]), considering ], are permitted to form an independent federation of Western Ukraine but should not be under Atlanticist control.<ref name="dunlop" />


In the Middle East and Central Asia: In the ] and ]:
* The book stresses the "continental Russian-Islamic alliance" which lies "at the foundation of anti-Atlanticist strategy". The alliance is based on the "traditional character of Russian and Islamic civilization". * The book stresses the "continental Russian–Islamic alliance" which lies "at the foundation of ]". The alliance is based on the "traditional character of ] and ] civilization".
* ] is a key ally. The book uses the term "Moscow-Tehran axis".<ref name="dunlop" /> * ] is a key ally. The book uses the term "Moscow–Tehran axis".<ref name="dunlop" />
* ] has a special role and will serve as a "strategic base" and it is necessary to create "the axis Moscow-Erevan-Teheran". Armenians "are an Aryan people the Iranians and the Kurds".<ref name="dunlop" /> * ] has a special role: It will serve as a "strategic base," and it is necessary to create "the axis Moscow-Yerevan-Teheran". Armenians "are an ] people ... the ] and the ]".<ref name="dunlop" />
* ] could be "split up" or given to Iran.<ref name="dunlop" /> * ] could be "split up" or given to Iran.<ref name="dunlop" />
* Russia needs to create "geopolitical shocks" within ]. These can be achieved by employing ], ], and ] (such as ]) to attack the ].<ref name="dunlop" />
* ] should be dismembered. ] and "United Ossetia" (which includes Georgia's ]) will be incorporated into Russia. Georgia's independent policies are unacceptable.<ref name="dunlop" />
* The book regards the ] as a Russian territory, including "the eastern and northern shores of the ] (the territories of ] and ])" and Central Asia (mentioning Kazakhstan, ], ], and ]).<ref name="dunlop" />
* Russia needs to create "geopolitical shocks" within ]. These can be achieved by employing Kurds, Armenians and other minorities.<ref name="dunlop" />
* The book regards the Caucasus as a Russian territory, including "the eastern and northern shores of the Caspian (the territories of ] and ])" and Central Asia (mentioning Kazakhstan, ], ] and ]).<ref name="dunlop" />


In ] and ]:
In Asia:
* ], which represents a danger to Russia, "must, to the maximum degree possible, be dismantled". Dugin suggests that Russia start by taking Tibet-Xinjiang-Mongolia-Manchuria as a security belt.<ref name="Russia’s New—and Frightening—Ism">{{cite journal|last=Dunlop|first=John B.|date=July 30, 2004|title=Russia's New—and Frightening—Ism|journal=]|publisher=Leland Stanford Junior University|issue=3|url=http://www.hoover.org/research/russias-new-and-frightening-ism|accessdate=April 2014}}</ref> Russia should offer China help "in a southern direction – Indochina (except Vietnam), the Philippines, Indonesia, Australia" as geopolitical compensatation.<ref name="dunlop" /> * Dugin envisions the fall of ]. The People's Republic of China, which represents an extreme geopolitical danger as an ideological enemy to the independent Russian Federation, "must, to the maximum degree possible, be dismantled". Dugin suggests that Russia start by taking ]–]–]–] as a security belt.<ref name="HI01"/> Russia should offer China help "in a southern direction – ] (except ]), ], ], ]" as geopolitical compensation.<ref name="dunlop" />
* Russia should manipulate ] by offering the ] to Japan and provoking anti-Americanism.<ref name="dunlop" /> * Russia should manipulate ] by offering the ] to Japan and provoking ], to "be a friend of Japan".<ref name="dunlop"/>
* ] should be absorbed into Eurasia-Russia.<ref name="dunlop" /> * ] should be absorbed into the Eurasian sphere.<ref name="dunlop"/>


The book emphasizes that Russia must spread Anti-Americanism everywhere: "the main 'scapegoat' will be precisely the U.S." The book emphasizes that Russia must spread geopolitical ] everywhere: "the main ']' will be precisely the U.S."


=== The West ===
In the United States:
In the ], ], and ]:
* Russia should use its special forces within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism. For instance, provoke "Afro-American racists". Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support ] tendencies in American politics."<ref name="dunlop" />
* Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States and Canada to ] and ] against ] globalist Western hegemony, such as, for instance, provoke "]" to create severe backlash against the rotten political state of affairs in the current present-day system of the ] and ]. Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of ] and ], ], and ], actively supporting all dissident movements – ], ], and ] groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support ]".<ref name="dunlop"/>
* The Eurasian Project could be expanded to ] and ].<ref name="dunlop"/>


==Reception and impact==
The Eurasian Project could be expanded to South and Central America.<ref name="dunlop" />
] senior fellow ] stated that "the impact of this intended 'Eurasianist' textbook on key Russian elites testifies to the worrisome rise of ] ideas and sentiments during the late ] and the ] period".<ref name="HI01"/> Historian ] wrote in '']'' that ''Foundations of Geopolitics'' is influenced by the work of ], a proponent of a conservative international order whose work influenced the ]. He also noted Dugin's key role in forwarding the ideologies of ] and ].<ref name="snyder">{{cite journal|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/mar/20/fascism-russia-and-ukraine/|title=Fascism, Russia, and Ukraine|last=Snyder|first=Timothy|date=20 March 2014|journal=]|volume=61 |issue=5 |access-date=5 September 2014|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160127154227/https://nybooks.com/articles/2014/03/20/fascism-russia-and-ukraine/|archive-date=2016-01-27}}</ref>


The book was described by '']'' as "one of the most curious, impressive, and terrifying books to come out of Russia during the entire post-Soviet era", and "more sober than Dugin's previous books, better argued, and shorn of ] references, ], traditionalism and other eccentric ]".<ref name=":0"/> In 2022, ''Foreign Policy'' also noted: "The recent invasion of Ukraine is a continuation of a Dugin-promoted strategy for weakening the international liberal order."<ref name="Young">{{cite news|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/03/06/russia-putin-civilization/|title=Putin Has a Grimly Absolute Vision of the 'Russian World'|last=Young|first=Benjamin|date=March 6, 2022|work=Foreign Policy|access-date=11 March 2022}}</ref> According to ], the book's cover contains a depiction of a ], a symbol that represents ] in modern occult movements, and the use of the symbol aligns with Dugin's general interest in the occult and occult symbolism. After the publication of the book, Dugin has also used the symbol as the logo of his ].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Shekhovtsov |first=Anton |date=2008-12-01 |title=The Palingenetic Thrust of Russian Neo-Eurasianism: Ideas of Rebirth in Aleksandr Dugin's Worldview |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760802436142 |journal=Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=491–506 |doi=10.1080/14690760802436142 |s2cid=144301027 |issn=1469-0764 |quote=Occult symbolism plays another important role in Dugin's ideological imagery. The eight-arrow star that became an official symbol of Dugin's organisation had first appeared on the cover of Osnovy geopolitiki, posited in the centre of the outline map of Eurasia. Misleadingly identified by Ingram as a swastika, this symbol is a modified 'Star of Chaos' and can be presumed to refer to 'Chaos Magick', an occult doctrine based on the writings of Crowley, Austin Osman Spare and Peter Carroll.}}</ref>
==Reviews==
] senior fellow ] stated that "the impact of this intended 'Eurasianist' textbook on key Russian elites testifies to the worrisome rise of fascist ideas and sentiments during the late Yeltsin and the Putin period."<ref name="Russia’s New—and Frightening—Ism"/>


==See also==
An essay in '']'' said that ''Foundations of Geopolitics'' is influenced by the work of ], a proponent of a conservative international order whose work influenced the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/mar/20/fascism-russia-and-ukraine/|title=Fascism, Russia, and Ukraine|last=Snyder|first=Timothy|date=20 March 2014|work=]|accessdate=5 September 2014}}</ref>
{{Portal|Politics|Russia|Ukraine}}


===Related topics===
==References==
* ]
{{Reflist}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
** ]
** ]
** ]


===Related literature===
]
* "]", 2022 speech by ]
* "]", 2021 essay by Putin
* "]", 2022 speech by Putin
* "]", 2022 article by Timofey Sergeytsev
* "]", a phrase used during the 2022 ]

== References ==
{{reflist|2}}

==External links==
* – Russian edition
* – Machine-translated English version
* by John B. Dunlop

{{Russian nationalism}}
{{2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine}}
{{authority control}}
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 21:05, 10 January 2025

1997 geopolitical book by Aleksandr Dugin
The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia
Russian edition cover
AuthorAleksandr Dugin
Original titleОсновы геополитики
LanguageRussian
PublisherArktogeja
Publication date1997
Publication placeRussia
ISBN978-5-8592-8019-3
This article is part of a series on
Eurasianism
Concepts
People
Works
Organisations
Related topics

The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia (Russian: Основы геополитики: геополитическое будущее России) is a geopolitical book by Aleksandr Dugin. Its publication in 1997 was well received in Russia; it has had significant influence within the Russian military, police forces, and foreign policy elites, and has been used as a textbook in the Academy of the General Staff of the Russian military. Powerful Russian political figures subsequently took an interest in Dugin, a Russian political analyst who espouses an ultra-nationalist and neo-fascist ideology based on his idea of neo-Eurasianism, who has developed a close relationship with Russia's Academy of the General Staff.

Dugin credits General Nikolai Klokotov of the Academy of the General Staff as co-author and his main inspiration, though Klokotov denies this. Colonel General Leonid Ivashov, head of the International Department of the Russian Ministry of Defence, helped draft the book.

Policy usage

Klokotov stated that in the future the book would "serve as a mighty ideological foundation for preparing a new military command". Dugin has asserted that the book has been adopted as a textbook in many Russian educational institutions. Former speaker of the Russian State Duma, Gennadiy Seleznyov, for whom Dugin was adviser on geopolitics, "urged that Dugin's geopolitical doctrine be made a compulsory part of the school curriculum".

Eurasianist foreign policy doctrine

This article is part of a series on
Conservatism in Russia
Ideologies
Principles
History
Intellectuals
Literature
Politicians
PartiesActive

Defunct

Organisations
Media
Related topics

Eurasianist sentiments have been on the rise across Russian society since the ascent of Vladimir Putin in the country. In a poll conducted by Levada Center in 2021, 64% of Russian citizens identify Russia as a non-European country; while only 29% regarded Russia to be part of Europe.

In 2023, Russia adopted a Eurasianist, anti-Western foreign policy in a document titled "The Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation", approved by Vladimir Putin. The document defines Russia as a "unique country-civilization and a vast Eurasian and Euro-Pacific power" that seeks to create a "Greater Eurasian Partnership" by pursuing close relations with China, India, countries of the Islamic world and the rest of the Global South (Latin America and Southern Africa). The policy identifies United States and other Anglo-Saxon countries as "the main inspirer, organizer, and executor of the aggressive anti-Russian policy of the collective West" and seeks the end of geopolitical American dominance in the international scene. The document also adopts a neo-Soviet posture, positioning Russia as the successor state of USSR and calls for spreading "accurate information" about the "decisive contribution of the Soviet Union" in shaping the post-WWII international order and the United Nations.

Content

In Foundations of Geopolitics, Dugin makes a distinction between "Atlantic" and "Eurasian" societies, which means, as Benjamin R. Teitelbaum describes it: "between societies whose coastal geographical position made them cosmopolitan and landlocked societies oriented toward preservation and cohesion". Dugin calls for the "Atlantic societies", primarily represented by the United States, to lose their broader geopolitical influence in Eurasia, and for Russia to rebuild its influence through annexations and alliances.

The book declares that "the battle for the world rule of Russians" has not ended and Russia remains "the staging area of a new anti-bourgeois, anti-American revolution". The Eurasian Empire will be constructed "on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of Atlanticism, strategic control of the U.S., and the refusal to allow liberal values to dominate us." Dugin seems not to rule out the possibility of Russia joining and/or even supporting the European Union and NATO instrumentally in a pragmatic way of further Western subversion against geopolitical "Americanism".

Outside of Ukraine and Georgia, military operations play a relatively minor role except for the military intelligence operations. The textbook advocates a sophisticated program of subversion, destabilization, and disinformation spearheaded by the Russian secret services. The operations should be assisted by a tough, hard-headed utilization of Russia's gas, oil, and natural resources to bully and pressure other countries. The book states that "the maximum task is the 'Finlandization' of all of Europe".

In Europe:

In the Middle East and Central Asia:

In East and Southeast Asia:

The book emphasizes that Russia must spread geopolitical anti-Americanism everywhere: "the main 'scapegoat' will be precisely the U.S."

The West

In the Americas, United States, and Canada:

Reception and impact

Hoover Institution senior fellow John B. Dunlop stated that "the impact of this intended 'Eurasianist' textbook on key Russian elites testifies to the worrisome rise of neo-fascist ideas and sentiments during the late Yeltsin and the Putin period". Historian Timothy D. Snyder wrote in The New York Review of Books that Foundations of Geopolitics is influenced by the work of Carl Schmitt, a proponent of a conservative international order whose work influenced the Nazis. He also noted Dugin's key role in forwarding the ideologies of Eurasianism and National Bolshevism.

The book was described by Foreign Policy as "one of the most curious, impressive, and terrifying books to come out of Russia during the entire post-Soviet era", and "more sober than Dugin's previous books, better argued, and shorn of occult references, numerology, traditionalism and other eccentric metaphysics". In 2022, Foreign Policy also noted: "The recent invasion of Ukraine is a continuation of a Dugin-promoted strategy for weakening the international liberal order." According to Anton Shekhovtsov, the book's cover contains a depiction of a Chaos Star, a symbol that represents chaos magick in modern occult movements, and the use of the symbol aligns with Dugin's general interest in the occult and occult symbolism. After the publication of the book, Dugin has also used the symbol as the logo of his Eurasia Party.

See also

Related topics

Related literature

References

  1. ^ Dunlop, John B. (July 30, 2004). "Russia's New—and Frightening—'Ism'". Hoover Institution. Retrieved 12 October 2017.
  2. ^ Burbank, Jane (22 March 2022). "The Grand Theory Driving Putin to War". The New York Times. New York City. Retrieved 23 March 2022. After unsuccessful interventions in post-Soviet party politics, Mr. Dugin focused on developing his influence where it counted — with the military and policymakers. With the publication in 1997 of his 600-page textbook, loftily titled 'The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia,' Eurasianism moved to the center of strategists' political imagination. In Mr. Dugin's adjustment of Eurasianism to present conditions, Russia had a new opponent — no longer just Europe, but the whole of the 'Atlantic' world led by the United States.
  3. ^ "The Unlikely Origins of Russia's Manifest Destiny". Foreign Policy. 27 July 2016. Archived from the original on 2016-07-27. Retrieved 2017-10-23.
  4. Liverant, Yigal (Winter 2009). "The Prophet of the New Russian Empire". Azure (35). Jerusalem: Shalem Center. ISSN 0793-6664. Retrieved 2015-04-06.
  5. Shekhovtsov, Anton; Umland, Andreas (October 2009). "Is Aleksandr Dugin a Traditionalist? 'Neo-Eurasianism' and Perennial Philosophy". The Russian Review. 68 (4). Wiley: 662–678. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9434.2009.00544.x. JSTOR 20621114.
  6. Lavelle, Peter (2003). Uncovering Russia (excerpt: A civil society without civility). Norasco Publishing. pp. 379–380. ISBN 0972970800.
  7. Firth, Charles (March 4, 2017). "1990s Manifesto outlining Russia's plans is starting to come true". news.com.au. Retrieved 12 October 2017.
  8. Mankoff, Jeffrey (October 17, 2011). Russian Foreign Policy: The Return of Great Power Politics. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 69–70. ISBN 9781442208261.
  9. ^ Dunlop, John (January 31, 2004). "Aleksandr Dugin's Foundations of Geopolitics" (PDF). Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. 12 (1). Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (George Washington University): 41. ISSN 1074-6846. OCLC 222569720. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 June 2016.
  10. Toal, Gerard (2017). Near Abroad: Putin, the West and the Contest Over Ukraine and the Caucasus. Oxford University Press. p. 78. ISBN 9780190253301.
  11. "Russia and Europe". Levada Center. 22 March 2021. Archived from the original on 1 May 2023.
  12. "Russia adopts new anti-West foreign policy strategy". Deutsche Welle. 31 March 2023. Archived from the original on 15 April 2023.
  13. Gould-Davies, Nigel (6 April 2023). "Russia's new foreign-policy concept: the impact of war". IISS. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023.
  14. "The Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation". Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the European Union. 1 March 2023. Archived from the original on 10 April 2023.
  15. Teitelbaum, Benjamin R. (21 April 2020). War for Eternity: The Return of Traditionalism and the Rise of the Populist Right. Penguin Books Limited. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-14-199204-4.
  16. Von Drehle, David (22 March 2022). "The man known as 'Putin's brain' envisions the splitting of Europe — and the fall of China". The Washington Post. Washington, D.C. Retrieved 22 March 2022. In his magnum opus, The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia, published in 1997, Dugin mapped out the game plan in detail. Russian agents should foment racial, religious, and sectional divisions within the United States while promoting the United States' isolationist factions. In Great Britain, the psy-ops effort should focus on exacerbating historic rifts with Continental Europe and separatist movements in Scotland, Wales, and Ireland.
  17. Snyder, Timothy (20 March 2014). "Fascism, Russia, and Ukraine". The New York Review of Books. 61 (5). Archived from the original on 2016-01-27. Retrieved 5 September 2014.
  18. Young, Benjamin (March 6, 2022). "Putin Has a Grimly Absolute Vision of the 'Russian World'". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  19. Shekhovtsov, Anton (2008-12-01). "The Palingenetic Thrust of Russian Neo-Eurasianism: Ideas of Rebirth in Aleksandr Dugin's Worldview". Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions. 9 (4): 491–506. doi:10.1080/14690760802436142. ISSN 1469-0764. S2CID 144301027. Occult symbolism plays another important role in Dugin's ideological imagery. The eight-arrow star that became an official symbol of Dugin's organisation had first appeared on the cover of Osnovy geopolitiki, posited in the centre of the outline map of Eurasia. Misleadingly identified by Ingram as a swastika, this symbol is a modified 'Star of Chaos' and can be presumed to refer to 'Chaos Magick', an occult doctrine based on the writings of Crowley, Austin Osman Spare and Peter Carroll.

External links

Russian nationalism
History
Expansionism,
imperialism and
Russification
Concepts
  • All-Russian nation
  • Collector of Russian lands
  • Emperor of all the Russias
  • Little Russian identity
  • Ethnic nationalism
  • Eurasia
  • Gayrope
  • Holy Rus
  • Moscow, third Rome
  • Nuclear Orthodoxy
  • Of all Rus' [ru; uk]
  • Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality
  • Orthodoxy or death!
  • Russia for Russians
  • Russian civilization
  • Russian Idea
  • Russian irredentism
  • Russian soul
  • "Russian world"
  • Russophilia and Russophobia
  • United and Indivisible Russia [ru; uk]
  • Ideologies
    Modern organizations
    Active
    Defunct
    Personalities
    After 1991
    Before 1991
    Media
    Opposition and criticism
    Category
    Russian invasion of Ukraine
    Part of the Russo-Ukrainian War
    Overview
    General
    Prelude
    Background
    Foreign
    relations
    Military engagements
    Southern
    Ukraine
    Eastern
    Ukraine
    Northern
    Ukraine
    Russia
    Airstrikes
    by city
    Airstrikes
    on military
    targets
    Resistance
    Russian-occupied Ukraine
    Belarus and Russia
    Russian
    occupations
    Ongoing
    Previous
    Potentially
    related
    Other
    War crimes
    General
    Attacks on
    civilians
    Crimes
    against
    soldiers
    Legal cases
    Reactions
    States
    and
    official
    entities
    General
    Ukraine
    Russia
    United States
    Other countries
    United Nations
    International
    organizations
    Other
    Public
    Protests
    Companies
    Technology
    Spies
    Other
    Impact
    Effects
    Human
    rights
    Terms and
    phrases
    Popular
    culture
    Songs
    Films
    Other
    Key people
    Ukrainians
    Russians
    Other
    Related
    Categories:
    Foundations of Geopolitics: Difference between revisions Add topic