Misplaced Pages

User talk:Joseph Prasad: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:16, 9 March 2015 editWinkelvi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,145 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Leonard Nimoy. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:46, 2 October 2017 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,564,448 editsm 1 dispenser.homenet.org URL deleted due to domain hijacking by squatters (discussion) 
(702 intermediate revisions by 62 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
⚫ {{talkheader|search=yes}}
<center>
<div style="padding: 20px; width: 1000px; background: :#f0f0ff; border: 5px solid #E6E8FA; text-align: justify; font-family: Times New Roman, sans-serif; font-size: 125%;">
⚫ {{talkheader|search=yes}}
This is my talk page. Leave me messages here. This is my talk page. Leave me messages here.
:'''Note: I do suffer from several mental illnesses and may take time to cool down, for either personal reasons, or if a discussion on here gets heated. If I don't respond to you immediately, it will be for either for this or on Mondays-Fridays, school.'''


== Glen Campbell == ==Stop==
⚫ Seriously—take it to ]. You will be permabanned if you {{diff2|701712503|keep}} {{diff2|701713305|this}} {{diff2|701713323|shit}} {{diff2|701713341|up}}. I don't want to see that happen. &#128406;]/] 03:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
:It's not a true dispute though, {{u|ATinySliver}}. One, he is using original research. Two, he is ignoring the established consensus that no one else besides him has tried to argue in a while. Three, other editors have reverted him on the exact same content. Wouldn't this belong in say, the Incidents noticeboard rather than the Dispute one? -- ] (]) 03:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
⚫ ::Read my last edit to this page before you blanked it: ''it does not matter''. Take it to DRR first, ''then'' ANI if necessary, before you get permabanned. &#128406;]/] 03:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
⚫ :::{{u|ATinySliver}}, should I now? Looks like he was reported at the edit warring noticeboard. -- ] (]) 04:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
::::Yes, you still should; it is a continuing dispute that will end with you both blocked. There is exactly one alternative, but answer honestly: would you be able to ''completely'' let the whole thing go? &#128406;]/] 04:03, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
:::::Yes, I'm just going to let it go. {{u|ATinySliver}}. That's what I'm doing right now, and was planning to do anyway. It just causes disruption to the page and I don't need another block. I can go edit somewhere else. Someone else can revert him if needed. In fact, someone else already did. -- ] (]) 04:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
::::::Your edits today belie any notion that this was what you were "planning to do anyway." Divorce yourself ''completely''—those articles off your watchlinst, that editor's contributions ignored, everything. &#128406;]/] 04:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
⚫ :::::::When I said "planning to do anyway", I meant before your suggestion to do so. -- ] (]) 04:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
::::::::Okay—but ''stick with it''. You have shown you can be a productive editor, and WP loses too many to disputes. &#128406;]/] 04:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
:::::::::I'll try, {{u|ATinySliver}}, but it looks like I will be getting soon regardless. -- ] (]) 04:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
::::::::::"No! Try not. Do! Or do not. There is no try." &#128406;]/] 04:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


You may be familiar with the phrase, "give him enough rope and he'll {{plain link|url=//en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Justinw303&action=history|name=hang himself}}." This is why we back away from disputes. Cheers! &#128406;]/] 00:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Other articles like ], ], ], ], ], ], ], etc. use this. Also, note that what you said , you said "other main careers", but Campbell has had a variety show called ''The Glen Campbell Goodtime Hour'' on CBS television and has been in other ]. Just because Taylor Swift doesn't have doesn't mean others do. ''']''' | ''']''' 06:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


⚫ ==Disambiguation link notification for January 28==
:{{u|Corkythehornetfan}}, There is no reason, as there is no other career section, all those articles aren't Good Articles, except for ], which is also known for acting. Also, he is not known for acting, why do you think he has infobox musical artist instead of person? -- ] (]) 06:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
::{{ec}} Okay, but it doesn't make since to have all of the sections in the GC article to be level 2 sections headers. The sections for his career should be listed under a main level 2 section heading and the following as section 3 or lower. Let's be consistent with most other musician articles. ''']''' | ''']''' 06:13, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


⚫ Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
==Recent edit to ]==
] Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. The stylized version of her name is covered in the lead, but per ], the most commonly used name should be the name of the page (which it is), and that name should match the name in the infobox. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ] (]) 13:17, 4 March 2015 (UTC)


⚫ It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 13:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
== Death Battle ==
== Blocked for sockpuppetry ==
{{Tmbox
| style = background: #f8eaba
| image = ]
| text = '''''This account has been ] indefinitely''''' from editing&#32;for a period of '''indefinite''' for ]{{#if:]|&#32;per evidence presented at ]}}. Note that multiple accounts are ], but using them for '']'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans ]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below. -- ] <small>]</small> 01:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)<!-- Template:uw-sockblock -->}}


== ]: Voting now open! ==
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ]&nbsp;without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] (]) 20:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Joseph Prasad. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
== List of 2015 albums ==


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Sure a reason!!!!! I was just adding TWO new albums out in July! But u destroyed my work! Thank you! <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:{{u|Trickykidd}}, well, you could have mentioned that in your edit summary, and it is not much work. Not hard to press the revert button. -- ] (]) 06:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Well, you are right. To add the third quarter was not much work! But u deleted it while i was adding new albums. THIS was much work. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:59, 5 March 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
⚫ :Well, just know to provide what you were doing in the edit summary. -- ] (]) 07:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/48&oldid=750792945 -->
:I always did ] (]) 07:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

::Yes, but you didn't provide enough, your edit summary was very broad, and made it seem like you were adding a section for no reason. -- ] (]) 07:15, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

⚫ ==Disambiguation link notification for March 8==

⚫ Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

⚫ It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

== Drake's Album ==

Stop trying to make it a mixtape. It literally doesn't matter what he wants to call it to keep his fans from being disappointed in the quality, the fact that it was sold for $12.99 on iTunes and allegedly fulfills a 4 album contract with Cash Money is proof enough that it's an album. Drop the issue, because I won't. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:For one, that's ], two, if that fufilled the contract, he wouldn't be making Views from the 6 with the same label. Three, Billboard says it's a mixtape. -- ] (]) 19:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

==Template:Citation needed==
⚫ You can use <nowiki>{{cn}} for short. Properly factored, it looks like {{cn|date=March 2015}}</nowiki> {{p|size=20px}} &mdash;]<b>&#47;</b>] 00:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

== March 2015 ==

Your placement of the referencing tag at the Leonard Nimoy article with this edit was ] and ] as well as ] rather than constructive and helpful. I have removed the tag per ] and suggest you read the subsequent section of that same article, found here . If you have issues with the article, discuss them on the talk page but don't edit disruptively to make a point. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
:No, I was not making a point in any fashion, ATinySilver seems to have no problem, YOU only appear to have a problem, you just appear to hate me. There was plenty of unreferenced info, I added the citation needed template. -- ] (]) 00:25, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
:::Placing cn tags everywhere is also tendentious, pointy, and disruptive. If you don't stop, I will have no qualms about reporting you at the appropriate noticeboard for disruptive editing. No one "hates" you, but your behavior is definitely disruptive and needs to stop. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

⚫ I must ask anyone and everyone to not provide any appearance that I am taking sides in any fight (or potential fight) in which I have no dog, metaphorically. I was helping with Wikicode; nothing more. &mdash;]<b>&#47;</b>] 00:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
:You have violated 3RR as well, so... -- ] (]) 00:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
⚫ ::{{U|ATinySliver}}, I'm not saying you're taking a side, I'm saying you didn't object. -- ] (]) 00:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
:::I appreciate that, but it does give the appearance, so please refrain. That having been said, the tags ''appear'' to be correct on first blush; there could even be more in the article. ''That'' having been said, the purpose for these tags is to remind ourselves and other editors that (and where) an article needs to be improved. Whenever that is our motivation—as opposed to tagging for its own sake—then it's usually correct. &mdash;]<b>&#47;</b>] 00:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
::::Yeah, I'm don't give a crap bout the previous discussion, your wording is fine, {{u|ATinySliver}}, I dropped it. I'm tagging sections that are unreferenced so editors can improve the article, heck, I may add needs extension tags for those tiny sections. Usually, when I tag something, I get to it eventually and do it myself. The tags just highlight the issues for other people. -- ] (]) 00:42, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

== AN/I notification ==

] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 00:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

== March 2015 ==
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''You're doing it again. Please stop.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 05:16, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:46, 2 October 2017

This is Joseph Prasad's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

This is my talk page. Leave me messages here.

Note: I do suffer from several mental illnesses and may take time to cool down, for either personal reasons, or if a discussion on here gets heated. If I don't respond to you immediately, it will be for either for this or on Mondays-Fridays, school.

Stop

Seriously—take it to dispute resolution. You will be permabanned if you keep this shit up. I don't want to see that happen. 🖖ATinySliver/ 03:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

It's not a true dispute though, ATinySliver. One, he is using original research. Two, he is ignoring the established consensus that no one else besides him has tried to argue in a while. Three, other editors have reverted him on the exact same content. Wouldn't this belong in say, the Incidents noticeboard rather than the Dispute one? -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 03:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Read my last edit to this page before you blanked it: it does not matter. Take it to DRR first, then ANI if necessary, before you get permabanned. 🖖ATinySliver/ 03:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
ATinySliver, should I now? Looks like he was reported at the edit warring noticeboard. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Yes, you still should; it is a continuing dispute that will end with you both blocked. There is exactly one alternative, but answer honestly: would you be able to completely let the whole thing go? 🖖ATinySliver/ 04:03, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I'm just going to let it go. ATinySliver. That's what I'm doing right now, and was planning to do anyway. It just causes disruption to the page and I don't need another block. I can go edit somewhere else. Someone else can revert him if needed. In fact, someone else already did. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 04:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Your edits today belie any notion that this was what you were "planning to do anyway." Divorce yourself completely—those articles off your watchlinst, that editor's contributions ignored, everything. 🖖ATinySliver/ 04:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
When I said "planning to do anyway", I meant before your suggestion to do so. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 04:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Okay—but stick with it. You have shown you can be a productive editor, and WP loses too many to disputes. 🖖ATinySliver/ 04:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
I'll try, ATinySliver, but it looks like I will be getting blocked soon regardless. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 04:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
"No! Try not. Do! Or do not. There is no try." 🖖ATinySliver/ 04:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be familiar with the phrase, "give him enough rope and he'll hang himself." This is why we back away from disputes. Cheers! 🖖ATinySliver/ 00:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ready Steady Go! (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Collins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Joseph Prasad. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 01:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Joseph Prasad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)