| Revision as of 21:45, 3 April 2015 editVanishedUser sdu8asdasd (talk | contribs)31,778 edits →who are you?: and you wonder why you get blocked...← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 04:48, 24 July 2021 edit undoLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators765,940 edits Undid revision 998067941 by Liz (talk)Tag: Undo |
| (540 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
__NOINDEX__ |
|
{{noindex}} |
|
|
|
{{ombox |image=] |text= This page has been ]. <!-- Template:Courtesy blanked --> |
|
{{Usertalkback |you=watched |me=watched}} |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 80K |
|
|
|counter = 17 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|algo = old(14d) |
|
|
|archive = User talk:Lukeno94/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Mark Schwarzer == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi! In reference to your comments on my talk page, the article I read stated that he has completed a move to Leicester City. In reference to your edit comment (specifically "Why does no one actually read what they're citing?), the article I read stated that he has completed a move to Leicester City. ] (]) 12:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
*That particular comment was more in frustration at people generally, not you, so I apologize for that. However, ], you definitely fell into the trap of believing the Daily Mail; as anyone can see by the fact there are still pieces three days later talking about him being about to sign shows how wrong the Daily Fail were. ] ] 12:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
You will be happy to know that Mark schwarzer's move has been confirmed by the premier league . <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|
|
*However, Leicester City have no official announcement, he has no player profile there, and Chelsea still list him as , so I'm afraid that the Premier League appear to have jumped the gun on that front, and we can't list him as a Leicester player yet as a result. ] ] 01:27, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:*And just as further proof that the website can get it wrong, . ] ] 01:28, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
We all knew it was happening could have saved yourself a lot of hassle it's now Signed and sealed ] (]) 17:48, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
*Well, now it is done, yes. However, I can think of numerous times in the past where a deal has been done and it looking like a formality, only for something unforeseen to crop up; ] being one example. ] ] 18:19, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Username== |
|
|
Hi, Its my name Shitesh Sachan and I used the same for my username shiteshsachan. What is wrong in it. Please understand it. ] (]) 02:13, 22 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
*If that is your real name, ], then that's fine, and I apologize :) ] ] 02:25, 22 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Nicklas Bendtner == |
|
|
|
|
|
You just made , please review ] <s>which you have violated</s>. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 19:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
*So you're not familiar with ], ], ''or'' ]? "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page". ], and you seem to be lacking in it right now. ] ] 19:06, 28 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Eidur Gudjohnsen == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, Why have you undone my edit for international goals saying the wikiproject says no to these. Most international players have their international goals on here. Please explain. --] (]) 15:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
*Every discussion I've seen on these tables has said no to including them, although it probably wouldn't hurt to start another one. They are sometimes OK if the player has only scored a couple of goals, but not those who have scored a lot of goals. ] ] 15:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== 72.196.235.154 == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for reverting that edit of Women in India. I really forgot to revert it. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 16:37, 29 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
*I'd guessed that was the case. If I were you, I wouldn't waste my time reverting to keep the vandalism notices on that IP's page in the future; the block log will take care of it for you, for the most part. Save yourself the hassle and annoyance. :) ] ] 16:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::*Problem is that this case has been apparently mishandled. Do we take the words of sock puppets if they claim that "we are brothers" after getting blocked before for socking? I guess we don't, and if we did, that means we tell them to try other ways for socking and that happened here. Now he is able to fool CU results. We also know that such problems are not recent and for years even other incompetent editors have been able to fool CU results. Have a good reading at ]. Note that none of these accounts are currently blocked except that IP(72.) that we talked about. While the potential long term abuse remains on going since 2010. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 16:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::*At this point, I don't think the socking issue even matters. This IP, on its own, is clearly disruptive enough to warrant blocking solely on that - and, no, ] suggests that family-blaming is generally not believed. CU is only good up to a point, and it really isn't that hard to game (I'm pretty sure I could do it very easily indeed if I really wanted to - but I don't intend to, and have no need of doing so!), so it is only good for catching out the lazier/less clued-in vandals. ] ] 16:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::You said the right thing, it is now mostly for catching the clueless vandals. Have a nice day, and thanks again. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 17:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::*Not a problem, thanks, and you as well. :) ] ] 17:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Don't shoot the messenger, but- == |
|
|
|
|
|
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] <sup>''''']'''''</sup> 16:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:It's just Colton Cosmic again. Deleted. --] <sup>]</sup> 16:48, 30 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:*Surprise surprise. Thanks for that - yes, I was a bit incivil on the page in question (I think that may be putting it mildly); I hold my hands up to that, and it's not the only example recently. I try and make up for it when I can, but sometimes stress brings the worst out in me, particularly when I'm faced with someone who clearly isn't paying attention. ] ] 16:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::*That ANI was crushed all too soon! Would've been more fun to have given it a bit more rope... {{wink}} ] <sup>''''']'''''</sup> 16:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::*Had a legitimate user raised the thread, they'd probably have had a valid case on the incivility front... except from the fact that no one had actually tried to discuss things with me. Still, it's amusing to see the petty attempts at getting their own back... particularly when they rush to do so, and simply didn't see where Khanyusufkhalil came into it all. Also, I didn't violate 3RR, and CC knew that, but tried to muddy the waters anyway. ] ] 17:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::*Amusing that CC is still wasting people's time with trying to force the thread onto ANI. "I don't sock" my ass. ] ] 09:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Disambiguation link notification for April 1== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Precious again == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 60em; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 )}} {{border-radius|1em}} border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix"> |
|
|
<div> |
|
|
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; background-color: #ddd; border: 5px solid #ddd; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}} {{border-radius|0.5em}}">]</div> |
|
|
'''mediation'''<br /> |
|
|
Thank you, goalkeeper, for quality contributions to articles on trains, sports and flights, such as ], and for mediation with understanding, "just because someone is foreign, and because they don't attend your place of education, doesn't mean they have no right to edit the article", - you are an ]! |
|
|
|
|
|
--] (]) 09:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
</div></div> |
|
|
Two years ago, you were the 443rd recipient of my ''']]''' ], --] (]) 17:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:*And once again, thank you. :) ] ] 22:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
