Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Japan: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:19, 9 April 2015 editInfinite0694 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,633 edits →RfC: Flag of Ryukyu: c← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:48, 6 January 2025 edit undoSeefooddiet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers23,209 edits →Korea-related article bounty: typo 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Japan}}
}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-04-11/WikiProject report|writer=Mabeenot|day=11|month=April|year=2011}}
{{shortcut|WT:JAPAN|WT:WPJAPAN}}
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Japan/Project talk}} {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Japan/Project talk}}
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Japan/Navbox}}<!-- Please keep this here for convenience -->
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/WikiProject used|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-04-11/WikiProject report|writer=Mabeenot|day=11|month=April|year=2011}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index
|mask=/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Japan/Project talk}} |archiveheader = {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Japan/Project talk}}
|minthreadsleft = 3 |minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(20d) |algo = old(35d)
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Japan/Archive/%(monthname)s %(year)d |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Japan/Archive/%(monthname)s %(year)d
}}
{{Auto archiving notice |bot=MiszaBot II |age=20 |units=days }}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index
|mask=/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes
}} }}
__TOC__ __TOC__


== Does anyone speak Japanese? ==
== Japanese name of the North Korea-aligned high school in Tokyo ==

I heard there was the "Korean Junior High and High School" in Tokyo that is North Korea-aligned. What is its Japanese name?

Thanks
] (]) 10:20, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

:There are a number of Korean schools in Tokyo. I don't know which if any are North Korea-aligned, but there is a list at ]. –&nbsp;] (]) 22:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
:: Thanks for posting this! There are certainly North Korean-aligned ones, and for a time there were more of them than South Korean-aligned ones. That may have changed recently but I'm not sure ] (]) 15:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

== Readings of 「八ヶ夕」 and 「六ヶ跡」? ==


I'm trying to eventually get ] to FA and I'd appreciate a second set of eyes from an experienced editor who can understand the sources cited in the Japan section. Is anything missing? Are the sources being misinterpreted? If it is, don't blame me (I didn't add the content in question). I just want to make sure everything is on the up and up. ] ] 11:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Can anyone help me with the proper readings of 「八ヶ夕」 and 「六ヶ跡」? They're from the names of series of prints by ]. ]&nbsp;] 00:23, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
:I don't get a single google hit for either one of those. You're sure they're correct? --] (]) 00:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC)


:Note that I can only read and understand some of it. The "Japan" section on the Criticism is okay. (The english NHK source already confirms it). Though I hope a more proficient than me looks into it though. '''''Warm Regards''''', ] (]) (]) 12:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
== Possible useful references for articles, free from the Met ==
:I found this Asahi article in English which is a pretty good represantation of the Japanese Asahi article already used: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15052469
:The Japanese Asahi article is paywalled after a certain point though, but what I want to point out about the Japanese articles and that English Asahi article, is that the people who did the survey finding these cases of abuse were not doing so at the behest of the government (they only did it after the government put out new guidelines of what's considered abuse in a religious context). The survey results were passed on to the government, but this makes me wonder if it is best to put this under a heading called "Government interactons".
:The English NHK article just says the survey was done by a "team of lawyers", and doesn't really clarify that the survey was carried out by an independent organization.
:I also question the term "investigation" used in the Wiki article. Investigation sounds a bit more in depth than what they did. It was an internet survey. There's nothing I can find that implies they verified these claims or found evidence to support them (though it does say some respondents spoke directly to psychiatrists).
:Honestly, that English Asahi article is probably a better source than the NHK one. The NHK one has some pretty bad translations. ] (]) 16:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC)


== Proposed split of ] ==
The ] has over 400 art books free online (you can read them online or download PDFs). Here is for the Japanese ones. ···]<sup>]</sup> · <small>] · ] · ]!</small> 16:16, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
I have proposed a split of the ] article which may be of interest to this project. I would appreciate your thoughts in the discussion on the ]. ] (]) 11:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)


==]== == ] ==
Is ''むかしむかし'' (昔昔) a relevant separate topic apart from ]? There's a merger notice about it at ''once upon a time'', while the Japanese article is solely a dicdef. -- ] (]) 04:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
:Merge sounds like a good idea to me. I would be bold and just do it. But there was an objection in the past to a redirect, so I created a discussion section at ]. If there are any comments they could go there. –&nbsp;] (]) 07:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


I am trying to clean up and update the Samurai article, and would like some feedback. I have removed a lot of text and started to shift the focus to the development and evolution of samurai as a class. I think that the article before focused too much on famous samurai and major battles. I have some research, and I find the work of historians such as Karl Friday, Thomas Conlan and William Farris are mostly neglected by the article in favour of sources like museum articles without bylines, Japanese dictionaries, and dated pop history books. However, removing some of these sources has become controversial, so some extra eyes on the page would be helpful. ] (]) 07:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
== Ogi "ji" ma or Ogi "shi" ma ==
I requested renaming of two Japanese islands at ] and ] because you can know how they should be spelled at this official site of . 男木島(おぎしま) should be Ogishima, and　女木島(めぎしま), Megishima. It is difficult to know whether a "島" is spelled as "shima" or "jima"; I don't know whether there are any more Japanese islands that is not correctly named.　I'd be very appreciated if anyone would check the names of Japanese islands. Thanks.--] (]) 16:42, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
:Moves done. ···]<sup>]</sup> · <small>] · ] · ]!</small> 17:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
== RfC: Flag of Ryukyu ==
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)


== Korea-related article bounty ==
{{RfC|hist|pol|soc|rfcid=5EF382D}}
] has labeled ] as a ], however he then provided '''three''' sources (from 1854, 1873, and one around the beginning of the Meiji period) that prove that the flag wasn't just made up by some random editor. He has now gone through multitudes of articles and a template with the sole edit summary of "DEL Misplaced Pages hoax". Even though this flag has been recorded 261 years ago as the "Ryukyu Kingdom flag", is it a "Misplaced Pages hoax" or should its use be restored where it was removed? ''']</span>''' (]) 00:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
*''Bankoku hakki zufu'' 萬國舶旗圖譜 by Matsui Nantai (1854),<ref>{{cite book |title=''Bankoku hakki zufu'' 万国舶旗図譜 |author=Matsui Nantai 松居南岱 |year=1854 |url=http://school.nijl.ac.jp/kindai/SUMI/SUMI-00237.html |accessdate=2 April 2015 |language=Japanese }}</ref>
*''Naigai kishō chikyū kokumei'' 内外旗章地球國名 by Katayama Tsutomu (1873),<ref>{{cite book |title=''Naigai kishō chikyū kokumei'' 内外旗章地球国名 |author=Katayama Tsutomu 片山勤 |year=1873 |url=http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/761507 |accessdate=2 April 2015 |language=Japanese }}</ref> and
*''Naigai kishō binran'' 内外旗章便覧 by an unknown author (undated).<ref>{{cite web |title=''Shin shūzō Okinawa kankei shiryō no shōkai'' 新収蔵沖縄関係資料の紹介 |author=University of the Ryukyus Library |url=http://manwe.lib.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/library/biblio/bib40-2/05.html |accessdate=2 April 2015 |language=Japanese }}</ref>
{{reflist-talk}}
*'''Restore''' - per above. ''']</span>''' (]) 00:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
**Are you doing this simply to demonstrate that you have no talent for historiography? Go to a bookstore, pick up a book on the history of the United Stats, and you cannot find the Stars and Stripes. That's what's happening here. You stick to George H. Kerr's ''Okinawa: The History of an Island People'' (1958) even though I warned that it was seriously outdated. Hey, which page is devoted to the ''phantom'' flag?
**So, have you checked the catalogs I cited? They are all available online. You can find the 清道 flag listed as the flag of Korea (朝鮮國旗). Do you know what this means?
**Although you ignore this, I explained at ] why these catalogs were unreliable. Even if you don't trust me (I guess so), what do you think about Kina Daisaku, a part-time curator at Naha City Museum of History, who was aware of the undated ''Naigai kishō binran'' and still concluded that he was unable to find contemporary sources in which the ''phantom'' flag was used as a national flag? --] (]) 01:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
***Sorry for the late response. What's wrong exactly with Kerr other than his POV of Ryukyuan pacifism? Besides, I have other sources to compliment Kerr. And none that I'm aware of (my copy is missing a few pages anyhow).
***Yes I have, they're very interesting. And I'm guessing that the Qing flag being shown as the flag of Korea is a political statement by the author? Or do you mean that they're just wrong/ignorant? Either way, just because they got one wrong doesn't mean all of them are wrong.
***No, I read your argument fully. For one, I'm not surprised that there aren't Okinawan sources before 1945. Another thing is, what do the "many other illustrated catalogs of flags" say about Ryukyu? And if you take the 1854 source, how would the author get "access to firsthand knowledge" on any of the flags in the catalog?
***The reason I opened this RfC was because you removed the flag as a "Misplaced Pages hoax", however you've provided sources that show otherwise. Even ''if'' it wasn't a "national flag" (maybe stylization of the Shō crest), you still prove that it was not made up on Misplaced Pages. Removing the flag as a "hoax" is the same as removing content and calling it ]. ''']</span>''' (]) 02:18, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
****First of all, you mix up two different aspects of the problem. At the Commons image description pages, I created two separate sections, "As a Misplaced Pages hoax" and "In search for truth." That this is a Misplaced Pages hoax has nothing to do with the new sources I added (the latter). By calling it a Misplaced Pages hoax, I'm not talking about whether this flag should be shown at Ryūkyū-related articles but about whether this incident is worth mentioning at articles like ] and ]. It's not unrealistic because we now have an external source that criticizes Misplaced Pages for spreading misinformation.
****Leaving aside the meta-discussion, I think my point is clear. A national flag is something we can easily find in the literature. If all we can salvage after serious research is obscure references, it is not what we consider the national flag. Even if we decide to mention it in articles, we must not give ].
****That said, I will answer minor questions.
****:You can find illustrated catalogs of flags not showing the ''phantom'' flag at the National Diet Library Digital Collections (e.g. ).
****:清道 means to clear the road. The 清道 flag was flown at the front of the procession of a diplomatic mission in order to get rid of people for passage (see ). In the catalogs I added, you can see this flag is referred to as 國旗, which we translate as "national flag" today. Apparently, the authors of these catalogs had considerably different notions of 國旗 from us.
****:Kerr's book is ''seriously outdated''. You may think that there is no significant progress in archaeology and historiography in the last half century. That's totally wrong. Major archaeological discoveries were triggered by the construction boom after Okinawa's return to Japan in 1972. Sai Taku's edition of the ''Chūzan Seifu'' was discovered in 1972. It is a missing link between the ''Chūzan Seikan'' and Sai On's edition of the ''Chūzan Seifu'', and we now have a far deeper understanding on how Sai On rewrote history. Anyway, what I mean by mentioning Kerr's book is that it should have mentioned the ''phantom'' flag if it was what we consider the national flag.
****--] (]) 16:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
*****I didn't mix them up, the latter contradicts the former. How can the flag be a Misplaced Pages hoax if 1) the flag preexists Misplaced Pages (and the Internet) 2) there are at least three sources that explicitly say this was the national flag of Ryukyu.
*****And I wouldn't call these sources "obscure". Also, the catalog you just provided a link to has two major problems: it also uses the 清道 flag for the flag of Korea, and it doesn't use the "phantom" flag because '''there is no entry for Ryukyu'''. Please point out the Ryukyuan flag for me, because double checking failed me.
*****No, I know a lot came out in the 60s and 70s. But again, I don't only rely on Kerr. And yes, I suppose he'd at least mention a flag. ''']</span>''' (]) 02:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
:If there are only vague historical references to the flag, I think we should stop using the image for ], regardless of its factuality. Images associated with a WikiProject should be a strongly associated symbol of that topic, such as the treble clef and note for ] or the extreme deep field for ]. How can we say that flag represents the Ryukyus when barely anyone has heard of it? I suggest something like ] (it's the image used for 'history of Okinawa' and the Chinese Ryukyu wiki project already) or a ] design. --] (]) 03:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
::This isn't about using the flag to represent the WikiProject, it's about its use as the national flag of the ] on Misplaced Pages, which Nanshu claims <s>was never the national flag</s> ''is a Misplaced Pages hoax'' and therefore should be removed entirely. ''']</span>''' (]) 03:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
:::Have there been any attempts to ask for input from Japanese-speaking Wikipedians on the ]? Especially since this is a Commons-related issue too. ] (]) 05:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
::::There was some discussion on the talk page of ] back in 2008 . Apparently the flag was on the page at that time, but it was later removed. ] (]) 01:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
:::Hey, I have never claimed that the ''phantom'' flag was ''never'' the national flag. That's ''probatio diabolica''. --] (]) 16:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
::::Sorry, I rephrased it. ''']</span>''' (]) 22:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
*I call for third opinions. Expecting Sturmgewehr88 to use common sense is found to be fruitless.
*Just for clarification, I have no opinion on the use of the ''phantom'' flag in the Ryukyu task force. I'm not a participant and probably will never be. I just feel that it ironically symbolizes the nature of the task force. --] (])
::Common sense? Common sense says (after you provided sources) that the flag isn't a Misplaced Pages hoax, therefore it shouldn't be removed as a hoax.
::I'm actually surprised that you only removed the flag from a couple dozen pages and not completely removed it from Misplaced Pages. But how does it symbolize "the nature" of the task force? ''']</span>''' (]) 22:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
:::I notified the Japanese Misplaced Pages that there needs to be input from editors who are able to read and interpret the sources. ] (]) 03:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
:::Per ], please avoid original research. I'm happy to consider other points of view and if you've actually read the "discussion on the talk page of ja:琉球王国", you'll notice that what i said is true. In fact, no treatises in refereed academic journals have reliable opinions about the Flag of Ryukyu, and these bibliographies should not be regarded as a reliable source that can check the information. --] (]) 14:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


X-posting here.
== Articles on Japanese sojourners in the USA ==


I'm offering a $150+ reward for each ] improved to ] status. A number of these articles are directly or indirectly related to Japan, so figured I'd post here too.
I'm not sure if these fit with "Japanese Americans" or not, so I'd like to post these Japanese-language articles and see where they should go:
*Agatsuma, Toshihiro (我妻 敏博; Division of Special Education (上越教育大学障害児教育講座)). "" (在米日本人障害児の実状(その1) : 日本人学校,補習授業校,私立の在外教育施設に対する調査; ). ''Bulletin of Joetsu University of Education'' (上越教育大学研究紀要) 21(1), 163-172, 2001. ]. ]. Joetsu University of Education Academic Institutional Repository (上越教育大学リポジトリ). ''English abstract available''.
*Minami, Yasusuke (南 保輔; ]). "" (アメリカの「日本人」高校生の文化アイデンティティと社会化経験 : コミュニケーションエコロジー調査から; ). ''Communication Studies'' (コミュニケーション紀要) 21, 1-34, 2010-03. Seijo University. ]. Seijo University Library (成城大学リポジトリ). ''English abstract available''.
] (]) 05:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


There's some limitations to this though; for details see ] and ]. ] (]) 10:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Also I would like to have feedback on whether this article is relevant enough to "]" or if there is a better place for it:
* Langager, Mark W. (マーク・W・ランガガー; ]). "" ( バイリテラシー習得媒体としての補習教育：二つの学習言語を両立させる日本人海外子女の事例; ). ''Educational Studies'' (教育研究) (52), 17-28, 2010-03-31. ]. ]. International Christian University Repository (国際基督教大学リポジトリ). ''English abstract available''.
] (]) 09:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:48, 6 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Japan and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconJapan
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 19:48, January 6, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

WikiProject Japan was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 11 April 2011.
Shortcuts
Talk & archives for WP Japan
Project talk
Task force talk/archives
↔ = joint task force
Old notice board
Related talk/archives
Search the archives:
V·T·E
WikiProject Japan (Talk)

Founded: 18 March 2006
(18 years, 9 months and 19 days ago)
Articles: 95,738 (188 featured)

Shortcuts
WP:JA • WP:JP • WP:JPN • WP:WPJ • WP:Japan • WP:JAPAN

Project pages

Article guidelines • Assessment • Barnsensu • Collaboration • Recognized content • Popular pages • Requested (Japan, government, anime & manga, seiyū) • Reviews (A-Class, Peer) • Translation • Participants (inactive) • ToDo (cleanup)

Project references

Arts and crafts glossary • Film credits glossary • Reference library • Unusual place names • Year conversion

Task forces

Ainu • Baseball↔ • Bibliography • Biography • Business & economy • Cars • Cinema↔ • CJKV↔ • Culture • Districts and municipalities (guideline)↔ • Education • Flora and fauna • Food and drink • Gaijin tarento • Geography & environment • History • Infrastructure • Karate↔ • Law & government • Military history↔ • Music • Mythology • Owarai • Photo • Politics • Prefectures • Religion • Royalty and nobility • Science & technology • Shinto • Sport • Tokyo • Transwiki↔ • Update
↔ = joint task force

Project links

Category • Deletions • List • Japan • Meta • MOS (Japan, Anime, municipality guideline) • New articles • Notice board • Portals: Japan, Ancient Japan, Anime, Buddhism, Nintendo, Tokyo

Child projects

Anime and manga (Dragon Ball, Yu-Gi-Oh!) • Entertainment (Hello! Project, Tokusatsu) • Games (Digimon, Final Fantasy, Nintendo, PlayStation, Pokémon, Square Enix, Zelda) • Japan (Sumo, Trains/New)

Related pages

Categories (Lists, Wikipedians) • Projects (Automobiles, Computer and video games, F1, Martial Arts, Mixed martial arts, MotoGP, Motorcycling, Motorsport, Sports Car Racing, WRC)

Recognition

{{WPJ-Barnsensu}} (recipients)   {{WikiProject Japan Barnstar 2.0}} (recipients)   {{The Japan Barnstar of National Merit}} (recipients)   {{The Most Noble Barnstar of National Honor}} (recipients)

Templates

{{WikiProject Japan}}   {{Japan current era date}}   {{Japanese}}   {{nihongo}}   {{Nihongo2}}   {{Nihongo3}}   {{Nihongo foot}}   {{Needhiragana}}   {{Needkanji}}

Userboxes

{{User WikiProject Japan}}   {{User WP Japan}}

Project parentage

Asia, Countries, East Asia, Geography

V·T·E·Q115724607 on Wikidata

Does anyone speak Japanese?

I'm trying to eventually get Jehovah's Witnesses to FA and I'd appreciate a second set of eyes from an experienced editor who can understand the sources cited in the Japan section. Is anything missing? Are the sources being misinterpreted? If it is, don't blame me (I didn't add the content in question). I just want to make sure everything is on the up and up. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Note that I can only read and understand some of it. The "Japan" section on the Criticism is okay. (The english NHK source already confirms it). Though I hope a more proficient than me looks into it though. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
I found this Asahi article in English which is a pretty good represantation of the Japanese Asahi article already used: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15052469
The Japanese Asahi article is paywalled after a certain point though, but what I want to point out about the Japanese articles and that English Asahi article, is that the people who did the survey finding these cases of abuse were not doing so at the behest of the government (they only did it after the government put out new guidelines of what's considered abuse in a religious context). The survey results were passed on to the government, but this makes me wonder if it is best to put this under a heading called "Government interactons".
The English NHK article just says the survey was done by a "team of lawyers", and doesn't really clarify that the survey was carried out by an independent organization.
I also question the term "investigation" used in the Wiki article. Investigation sounds a bit more in depth than what they did. It was an internet survey. There's nothing I can find that implies they verified these claims or found evidence to support them (though it does say some respondents spoke directly to psychiatrists).
Honestly, that English Asahi article is probably a better source than the NHK one. The NHK one has some pretty bad translations. Erynamrod (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed split of Landlord deity

I have proposed a split of the Landlord deity article which may be of interest to this project. I would appreciate your thoughts in the discussion on the talk page. Erynamrod (talk) 11:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Samurai

I am trying to clean up and update the Samurai article, and would like some feedback. I have removed a lot of text and started to shift the focus to the development and evolution of samurai as a class. I think that the article before focused too much on famous samurai and major battles. I have some research, and I find the work of historians such as Karl Friday, Thomas Conlan and William Farris are mostly neglected by the article in favour of sources like museum articles without bylines, Japanese dictionaries, and dated pop history books. However, removing some of these sources has become controversial, so some extra eyes on the page would be helpful. Tinynanorobots (talk) 07:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Honda Super Cub

Honda Super Cub has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Korea-related article bounty

X-posting here.

I'm offering a $150+ reward for each top-importance WikiProject Korea article improved to WP:GOODARTICLE status. A number of these articles are directly or indirectly related to Japan, so figured I'd post here too.

There's some limitations to this though; for details see Misplaced Pages:Reward board#Top importance WikiProject Korea articles and Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Korea#Article bounty. seefooddiet (talk) 10:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Categories: