Misplaced Pages

User talk:Callanecc: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:26, 10 April 2015 editOccultZone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers224,089 edits →Violation?: {{resolved}}← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:04, 11 January 2025 edit undoFreedoxm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers1,491 edits →Protection on Yoon Suk Yeol: new sectionTag: New topic 
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Page and group editnotices ] & ] --> <!-- Page and group editnotices ] & ] -->{{User:Callanecc/Header}}
{{User:Callanecc/Break}}{{User talk:Callanecc/Header}} {{User:Callanecc/Break}}
{{Talk header}}
{{User:Callanecc/Template/Email}}
{{User:Callanecc/Template/Usertalkback}}
{{User:Callanecc/Template/TPS}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk:Callanecc/Archive index
|mask=User talk:Callanecc/Archive <#>|indexhere=no}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(5d) | algo = old(32d)
| archive = User talk:Callanecc/Archive %(counter)d | archive = User talk:Callanecc/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 18 | counter = 28
| maxarchivesize = 150K | maxarchivesize = 250K
| minthreadsleft = 3
| archiveheader = {{Talk archive navigation}} {{search archives|prefix=User talk:Callanecc}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 | minthreadstoarchive = 3
| archiveheader = {{Talk archive navigation}}
| minthreadsleft = 2
}} }}


== ] == == Nomination for deletion of ] ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice-->


==That IP is back again==
Extend pc time? --] (]) 06:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Callanecc, That IP is back edit warring on the ] again and has now decided to . I see they have on the ] page, so I'm not the only one who is struggling with this individual. Someone on the Godley history says the range should be banned, but as they hop IPs to different countries, I'm not sure that's going to be much of a barrier, but who knows. Thanks - ] (])
:I've blocked {{IPrange|213.55.128.0/17}} from editing those two pages for a week for edit warring. I did 36 hours last time so we can keep increasing as needed. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 07:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
::That's great - thanks very much indeed! - ] (]) 07:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)


==Happy Adminship Anniversary!==
== AE question ==
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
{{ombox
| name = Happy Adminship
| image = ]
| imageright = ]
| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| plainlinks = yes
| text = <big>'''Happy adminship anniversary!'''</big><br />Hi Callanecc! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your ]. Enjoy this special day! ] (]) 01:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
}}


==Io Saturnalia!==
Hi, I'm not to familiar with the Pakistan/India arbitration regime. Am I correct that there is no general 1RR restriction there? Reply here is ok. Thanks. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 11:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
:That's correct, it's just normal discretionary sanctions (but which have been enforced pretty vigorously in the past). From memory only Israel/Pakistan has a general 1RR at the moment. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 11:20, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
::Israel/Palestine? ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 11:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
:::Sorry ]. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 12:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


{| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FF0000;"
My experience is that the 1RR was a great thing for the Arab-Israeli section. It doesn't stop edit-warring, but it makes people pause before reverting again. It also helps to get rid of fly-by-night political activists. I suspect that a similar restriction on the Pakistan/India area would be good there too, though it ought to be discussed more widely first. How would you feel about imposing it now on a few articles, such as the BJP article? ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 05:18, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" valign="right" | ]
:It's a good idea in principle, but I don't think they'd be consensus (not that that's technically needed) for imposing it generally across the whole topic. That said it can be really helpful if placed on a case by case basis.
|rowspan="2" |
:I'm not sure it would have too much effect on ]. Editors there seems to have gone back to discussing. Added to that the conflicts seems to be drawn out so 1RR wouldn't be too effective.
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Io, ]!'''
:What do you think? <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 06:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
|-
:: In my opinion it will be useful. Vanamonde always revert first and then discusses. If Calypso or someone adds something he doesn't like, it is reverted (multiple times) and the other is forced to go to talk page, and if something he adds is removed it is placed repeatedly and again the other person is forced to go to talk page. 1RR will restrict his ownership. --]<sup>]</sup> 04:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. ] (]) 15:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
:::AP would like to make it seem like I'm the only one who reverts frequently, when I have never been blocked for edit-warring in the topic area, and he has, twice. I'm also fairly certain that this is not the venue for discussing my behavior, unless of course Callanecc wants to. ] (]) 04:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
|}
:::: No, this is not the place, if evidence is asked I can easily give more than three cases of you reverting more than three times. You get away because it is usually a new editor and doesn't even know the rules. You had baited me on both occasions along with your buddy, I was inexperienced. You have been blocked for edit war too. Anyway think this: if that's not your nature then you have nothing to worry if 1RR is imposed, right? --]<sup>]</sup> 06:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


== Previously contentious topic blocked user on edit spree ==
== Undeletion ] ==


Just checking, are you aware this user ], is currently making many edits to the Zionism page? Sorry I don't know how to link a talk page subject specifically, but you left something on their talk page regarding a block from the article. All of their edits are either on Israel, Zionism, or the Palestine-Israel conflict; so I just felt I should bring it to your attention. ] (]) 21:06, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
He was plays in the Indonesia Super League see soccerway, in history <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Hi 112.215.64.223, I'd rather not undelete it at this stage. Instead could you please submit a ]. Regards, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 06:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)


:Hi @], I can't see any issues with DMH's editing to that article at the moment. The previous block was specifically for breaking the ] on the article rather than any other issue. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 23:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
== ] ==
::Oh I see, I saw that they had a high number of reverted changes to the article recently which is why I brought it up, but looks like those have stayed reverted so you're right it is fine and unrelated to their prior block. Cheers ] (]) 23:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)


== A barnstar for you! ==
Extend PC time? --] (]) 05:03, 5 April 2015 (UTC)


{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
==You've got mail!==
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ]
{{you've got mail|subject=|ts=15:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)}}
|rowspan="2" |
''''']]''''' 15:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Admin's Barnstar'''

|-
== A pie for you! ==
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For taking care of the vandalism ] and ]. Thank you! ] (]) 23:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Happy Easter! ] ] ☮ღ☺ 17:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
|} |}


:Thanks {{u|JeffSpaceman}}. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 23:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
== Please comment on ] ==

The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 24334 --> ] (]) 00:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

== Violation? ==
{{Resolved|Socks blocked by Elockid. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 03:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)}}
Greetings Callanecc. Worm is not online for nearly 5 days. Thus I would like to know from you if the creation of was any violation of my restriction. Although I don't consider it as violation because I hadn't referred to the particular article anywhere, and only named the editors who have contributed there. If I am correct, can I also refer to over there? Thank you. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 00:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
:OccultZone, being the third time you've tried to find a way to connect these accounts, it appears that you're just throwing things at the wall, hoping for something to stick. ​—] (])​ 00:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
:Let me make this crystal clear, you need to step away from these editors! If you continue accusing them of sockpuppetry it is likely to be consider harassment. You need to step away from this topic area and from these editors (and those you think are related to them) right now. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 06:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
::I think I would rather wait for him, or just make an appeal. Thanks anyway. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 06:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
:::No I'm saying stop or you're risking being blocked for harassment. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 06:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
::::Don't worry I will be back here and do nothing until you allow. That would be fine? ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 06:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
:::::No, just drop it completely. If there is something to be found, let someone else deal with it and don't get involved. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 07:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
:::::I have to agree with Callanecc, and it occurs to me, OccultZone, that I did warn you that further accusations of sockpuppetry against these users would be considered to be personal attacks. ​—] (])​ 12:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
::::::I assure both of you, that I have taken everything in account that has been said above. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 12:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

== ] ==

<section begin="technews-2015-W15"/><div class="plainlinks mw-content-ltr" lang="en" dir="ltr"><div class="plainlinks">
Latest ''']''' from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. ] are available.

'''Recent changes'''
* You can join a new ] for important news about Wikimedia Labs.
* You can read the last ]. In the future you can read team reports ]. You can see current work on the ].
* The number of articles in ] is now updated once a month.
* You can use a new version of the . Using the app, you can now with your friends.

'''Problems'''
* The import tool was broken for a few days. Imports didn't add log entries. You can delete and import pages again if necessary.
* Labs was broken several times this week.

'''Changes this week
* The ] of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since April 1. It will be on non-Misplaced Pages wikis from April 7. It will be on all Wikipedias from April 8 (]).
* You can now add the same special characters with VisualEditor as with the wikitext editor.
* Many bugs around copy-paste in VisualEditor are now fixed.
* You can now use basic tools of VisualEditor in the ]. You can add links, bold and italics. You can also mention people.

'''Meetings'''
* You can join the next weekly meeting with the Editing team. During the meetings you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on . See ].

'''Future changes'''
* You can again ] on how you want to see Wikidata edits in your watchlist on other wikis.

''''']''' prepared by ] and posted by ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ].''
</div></div> <section end="technews-2015-W15"/> 15:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Guillaume (WMF)@metawiki using the list at http://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=11727907 -->

== Igor Radusinovic ==


== Rejected page protection ==
Hi Callanecc, I want to ask you kindly to restore the article ] since now he have played in ], thus making him notable. Source . Cheers! ] (]) 00:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
:Hi {{u|MbahGondrong}}, I'd rather not undelete myself it at this stage. Instead could you please submit a ]. Regards, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 00:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
::I have made a ] instead, ]. ] (]) 00:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


Please check the edit history . How am I supposed to do a dispute resolution thing since it's clear vandalism? "war flag" and naval flag has nowhere place in the infobox. Also multiple IP abuse. ] (]) 14:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
==Re: Page protection==


:Pages: ] and ]. ] (]) 14:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Can you please impose semi-protection on ]? You had blocked Basdrhnrnz who was the biggest contributor of this article in terms of adding more bytes to it. Now he seems to be restoring to his version through IPs. Content is copyvio, and these edits are disruptive at best. I had already requested this at RFPP, but they really don't understand. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 02:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


::Start a discussion on the talk page like you would for any other content dispute and let the other party know it's there (on their talk page). If they then decide not to contribute you deal with it as edit warring. I'd point out that the IP has started a discussion at ]. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 23:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
== AE Archiving ==


== EXIENT LIMITED History formerly Game Quest and formed by David Hawkins ==
Callannecc, the bot keeps archiving the AE section I opened. I've reverted it twice; any more, and I'm beginning to look incredibly pushy. Even if that thing is to be closed no action, could you please formally close it, so that I know I can move on? Regards, ] (]) 20:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


Checkout https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/04028014
== ] ==


Please do not revert it back the article in the Oxford Mail is and was inaccurate, they attributed all my contributions to Charles Chapman a person whom has not being a part of the EXIENT story since 2011. I would like to keep the history as was written previously or I write the correct history but please do not put back something that is factually incorrect. ] (]) 14:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Lower to pending changes? This person already resigned as a district representative. Also, people might cool down for a while. --] (]) 05:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
:It's still pretty controversial as far as I can tell so I'd rather leave it semi protected for now at least. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 09:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC) :I've left a further message on your talk page. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 00:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)


== 20 March? == == Protection on Yoon Suk Yeol ==
{{resolved}}
You mean 20 March 2016 or 20 April of this year? ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 10:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


Since the temporary protection on ] is because of ip users who vandalise, should it become pending changes for the remainder of the duration? Thanks. ](] • ]) 19:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
== Arbitration case request clarification closed ==
Hi Callanecc, the Arbitration Committee has closed the , which you were listed as a party to. For the Arbitration Committee, -- <font face="Papyrus" size="4" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 19:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:04, 11 January 2025

Callanecc is busy and may not respond swiftly to queries.
This is Callanecc's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28Auto-archiving period: 32 days 
If you wish to discuss or inform me of a sensitive or private matter please read User:Callanecc/Emailnotice before emailing me.
  • If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If it was a warning or other notice please ping me so I know to look.
  • If you leave me a message: I will answer on this talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages is appreciated.

Nomination for deletion of Template:ACC terms

Template:ACC terms has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page.

That IP is back again

Hi Callanecc, That IP is back edit warring on the List of Maggie Smith performances again and has now decided to label my edits as vandalism and call me a troll in the process. I see they have also edit warred and labelled as vandalism on the Janey Godley page, so I'm not the only one who is struggling with this individual. Someone on the Godley history says the range should be banned, but as they hop IPs to different countries, I'm not sure that's going to be much of a barrier, but who knows. Thanks - SchroCat (talk)

I've blocked 213.55.128.0/17 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) from editing those two pages for a week for edit warring. I did 36 hours last time so we can keep increasing as needed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
That's great - thanks very much indeed! - SchroCat (talk) 07:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Misplaced Pages globe and sysop mopHappy adminship anniversary!
Hi Callanecc! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC) 		Party popper emoji

Io Saturnalia!

Io, Saturnalia!
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Previously contentious topic blocked user on edit spree

Just checking, are you aware this user User talk:DMH223344, is currently making many edits to the Zionism page? Sorry I don't know how to link a talk page subject specifically, but you left something on their talk page regarding a block from the article. All of their edits are either on Israel, Zionism, or the Palestine-Israel conflict; so I just felt I should bring it to your attention. 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 21:06, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Terrainman, I can't see any issues with DMH's editing to that article at the moment. The previous block was specifically for breaking the one-revert restriction on the article rather than any other issue. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Oh I see, I saw that they had a high number of reverted changes to the article recently which is why I brought it up, but looks like those have stayed reverted so you're right it is fine and unrelated to their prior block. Cheers 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 23:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
For taking care of the vandalism here and here. Thank you! JeffSpaceman (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks JeffSpaceman. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Rejected page protection

Please check the edit history . How am I supposed to do a dispute resolution thing since it's clear vandalism? "war flag" and naval flag has nowhere place in the infobox. Also multiple IP abuse. Beshogur (talk) 14:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Pages: Flags of the Ottoman Empire and flag of Turkey. Beshogur (talk) 14:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Start a discussion on the talk page like you would for any other content dispute and let the other party know it's there (on their talk page). If they then decide not to contribute you deal with it as edit warring. I'd point out that the IP has started a discussion at Talk:Flags of the Ottoman Empire. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

EXIENT LIMITED History formerly Game Quest and formed by David Hawkins

Checkout https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/04028014

Please do not revert it back the article in the Oxford Mail is and was inaccurate, they attributed all my contributions to Charles Chapman a person whom has not being a part of the EXIENT story since 2011. I would like to keep the history as was written previously or I write the correct history but please do not put back something that is factually incorrect. 212.56.159.202 (talk) 14:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

I've left a further message on your talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Protection on Yoon Suk Yeol

Since the temporary protection on Yoon Suk Yeol is because of ip users who vandalise, should it become pending changes for the remainder of the duration? Thanks. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 19:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)