| Revision as of 17:26, 14 April 2015 edit174.141.182.82 (talk) →Ace Combat redlink discussion: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:53, 11 October 2018 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,059 editsm Reverted edits by Ry Incognito (talk) to last version by EaglestormTag: Rollback | ||
| (76 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| # ] | # ] | ||
| # ] | # ] | ||
| # ] |
# ] | ||
| # ] | |||
| # ]}} | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| ==DYK for El Presidente (film)== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the film ''''']''''', an official ] entry, is possibly the most expensive Filipino film of all time?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/El Presidente (film)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/El Presidente (film)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for making ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. </div> | ||
| == February 2013 == | |||
| <!-- Template:uw-aoablock --> | |||
| ⚫ | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' |
||
| Per the consensus at ], I have blocked you indefinitely for personal attacks and incivility. This is a collaborative project on which ] is one of the ]; personal attacks and an almighty lack of ] towards your fellow editors are not acceptable. I suggest you take some time out and ] with an unblock request when you feel you can edit here without attacking fellow editors. ] (]) 16:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|reason=This is clearly another attempt at persecution and you people play along with them, nothing more than another act to legitimize the ruining of many years' hard work. You already blocked me before and you still couldn't leave enough alone. what ANI thread? that one where everyone tries to force various tenets of policy just to pull me down? Personal attacks and incivility... have I expressed any of that these past few weeks? Samwalton this block is not justifiable and since that notice went in effect, I have stayed away. I have been minding my own business and opening that ANI discussion is wrong to the point that I don't have to dignify it by joining there. this is not right. I'm very disappointed in you all. You don't want "attacks on other editors"? Stay the hell out of my way and that so-called "almighty lack of AGF" is a twisted way to legitimize putting me down. --] (]) 12:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)|decline=Misplaced Pages is not your personal property where others should avoid you if they don't want to be insulted (and yes, you have engaged in all kinds of personal attacks, ranging from unfounded accusations of bad faith to outright insults, over the past few weeks). Since you cannot even see why your behaviour is unacceptable, much less credibly claim to change it, I cannot unblock you. ] (]) 15:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
| *Hi {{u|Eaglestorm}}, I see you're a long-term contributor to Misplaced Pages, and perhaps you're getting a bit stressed by the poor competence that characterizes a lot of the contributions here? I've been here for some time myself and I got burned out for similar reasons, and I found my temper was getting short and I had little tolerance for what I saw as the same problems over and over again. My solution was to hand in my admin bit and take a long time off - in fact, I intended never to return. But I still see enormous benefit in the project, and I'm back again and have even returned to admin duties. And those incompetent edits? Well, they have to happen, because it's new people every day who don't yet know how to contribute properly (and the barrage of Misplaced Pages polices can be quite daunting for a newcomer). Anyway, I'm not trying to tell you what to do, I'm just hoping that some thoughts from me might help. ] (]) 15:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=''This is highly unjustified and AussieLegend and people like Meggieh69 are pushing too far. The warnings they sent my way are illegal because I do not intend to dignify their actions with a response. I'm currently concentrating on other edits. For the past several weeks, Meggieh69 and AL have been breathing down my neck for some things they do wrong. If Meggieh69 couldn't hack the way I put in the episode descriptions (which I have tried to steer away from being close to original; AL has been working to revert potential copyvio ep descriptions and he sees Meggieh69's nonsense as much better), I think he ought to stay away, because he's nothing more than an SPA obsessed with HIMYM episode description and goes forumshopping to defend himself. It has been amped up further by people such as 134340Goat who often defers to Meggieh69 about my editing patterns these past few years. Please remove this block immediately, but I don't intend to work with these people. The ep summaries have been doing well until Meggieh69 came along. I have been editing well for the past six years and you want to crack down on me because of some noob who thinks he's better?'' | decline=Wow...] and ] in the same failed unblock (]''']''']) 15:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| *Eagle, you need to calm down, relax, and try and thrash out a consensus in talk pages. ]y edit summaries, comments and deletions of information won't help your case. If you don't want to work with these editors, the answer is simple: work on some of the thousands of other articles in need of improvement. ] ] 19:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Who are you? Don't tell me where I can and can't edit... and BWilkins what's that supposed to mean? --] (]) 14:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==The reemergence of a blocked editor== | |||
| == ANEW and Vortex == | |||
| I noticed Bilorv deleting personal attacks by an IP editor claiming I "got" what I supposedly deserved. I think I know who it i is: It's Whitmore8621, whose SPI reports I filed from September to October 2010 caught him redhanded. I have tracked down the and it's user history is more or less the same as that blocked editor. I know that due to my undeserved status, I can't file SPI reports again, but given that he's been editing on a lot of subjects he got hot water for before, he can't be let off the hook just because I'm out of the game. N--] (]) 09:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| Please read my comments at ] and consider yourself '''warned'''.--] (]) 15:23, 6 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you and from his lengthy responses, it seems he can't leave enough alone and he's very much inflexible about his precious plot summary being adjusted to fit the actual story. He proclaims to have worked so hard to improve the article when his reverts are basically trying to tell people he owns the article. What nonsense. Consider him a member of an alliance against me. --] (]) 16:06, 6 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Eaglestorm. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| I'm here to talk to you about Bluerules. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| He does a history of disruptive editing over film credit orders in cast section on various films, including ], ], ], ], ], etc. ] and I do agree that his persistent and disruptive editing over cast orders in various movies is not necessarily meeting up with consensus. He has a history of blocks as well as a result of his disruptive editing. | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/22&oldid=750585861 --> | |||
| I just thought you should know that your not alone on this. ] (]) 08:00, 1 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I've been seeing the behavior for the past several weeks. He's clearly off the deep end. --] (]) 08:12, 1 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation == | |||
| You are invited to join in on ] of the Edit Warring noticeboard. ] (]) 18:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Negative national stereotypes in CoH2== | |||
| Why did you deleted all information about uproar, evoked by the game in Russia and other countries? What does it mean "delete; talk page discussion first" - if there is a talk page discussion? This information was about point of view, expressed in review articles, popular blogs and petitions with thousands of supporters! | |||
| :First up, speak English properly. My edit summary is what is - I don't have to explain it to you. So you say your piece in the discussion and if your points are not notable for inclusion, don't force the issue. These petitions you claim? How do we know you didn't engineer that for inclusion, you big ''zhmurik''? --] (]) 11:16, 27 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Ban Appeal of AKonanykhin == | |||
| Hi. Since you contributed to the resulting in the ban of Wikiexperts, you may want to consider the CEO's appeal at ]. --] (] · ] · ]) 17:23, 20 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Let me read it first and yeah, Jehochman's so a whiteknight for a guy who has his own article. Thanks!--] (]) 14:22, 23 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == How I Met Your Mother == | |||
| I am requesting a discussion be made somewhere, regarding the series of edits made to ] articles - many by you. I have posted a message on ]'s ] in much greater detail: the bulk of the message is there. I am aware that you may not respond swiftly but would like your input if a proper discussion does get started. ] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 15:38, 22 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Slurs''' In case you aren't aware, is considered rude. If you have a problem with my edits, that's fine but referring to them as a mass slaughter or calling into question my mental health is not. Many of these articles have trivial and unsourced sections (many of them have had them for years) and those are inappropriate. —]<span style="color:red">❤]☮]☺]☯</span> 15:46, 22 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Since this message, you have continued to revert more edits by Koavf to HIMYM articles (e.g.). Please respond - I have had a conversation with Koavf on their ] - read it and feel free to add to the discussion. | |||
| If you revert another of Koavf's edits on a HIMYM article without replying here, on ], ] or anywhere else, I will start mass reverting any of your edits that go against the vague consensus reached between me and Koavf to see if that can get your attention. ] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 15:32, 23 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ] Hello. I noticed that you reverted one of my changes to ] without leaving an ]. When reverting edits that are not obviously vandalism, please leave an edit summary so people understand the reasoning behind the edit. ''(Although this is not actually a template, I am justifying this with ].)'' ] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 06:58, 30 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == July 2014 == | |||
| ] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ] or removed. | |||
| * If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ]. | |||
| * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | |||
| Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in ]. ''Per ]''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> ] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 12:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Ace Combat redlink discussion == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and '''breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]'''. | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-ew --> | |||
| Look, if you’re not willing to even discuss this, then please stop reverting it. I’ve given my argument, which is in line with Misplaced Pages policy. Now it’s your turn. And calling my attempts at communication a is just disingenuous. Misplaced Pages works through collaboration. You must be willing to do that. —] (]) 17:26, 14 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:53, 11 October 2018
Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).
| This is Eaglestorm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
Blocked
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Per the consensus at this ANI thread, I have blocked you indefinitely for personal attacks and incivility. This is a collaborative project on which civility is one of the five pillars; personal attacks and an almighty lack of good faith towards your fellow editors are not acceptable. I suggest you take some time out and come back with an unblock request when you feel you can edit here without attacking fellow editors. Sam Walton (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Eaglestorm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is clearly another attempt at persecution and you people play along with them, nothing more than another act to legitimize the ruining of many years' hard work. You already blocked me before and you still couldn't leave enough alone. what ANI thread? that one where everyone tries to force various tenets of policy just to pull me down? Personal attacks and incivility... have I expressed any of that these past few weeks? Samwalton this block is not justifiable and since that notice went in effect, I have stayed away. I have been minding my own business and opening that ANI discussion is wrong to the point that I don't have to dignify it by joining there. this is not right. I'm very disappointed in you all. You don't want "attacks on other editors"? Stay the hell out of my way and that so-called "almighty lack of AGF" is a twisted way to legitimize putting me down. --Eaglestorm (talk) 12:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Misplaced Pages is not your personal property where others should avoid you if they don't want to be insulted (and yes, you have engaged in all kinds of personal attacks, ranging from unfounded accusations of bad faith to outright insults, over the past few weeks). Since you cannot even see why your behaviour is unacceptable, much less credibly claim to change it, I cannot unblock you. Huon (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Hi Eaglestorm, I see you're a long-term contributor to Misplaced Pages, and perhaps you're getting a bit stressed by the poor competence that characterizes a lot of the contributions here? I've been here for some time myself and I got burned out for similar reasons, and I found my temper was getting short and I had little tolerance for what I saw as the same problems over and over again. My solution was to hand in my admin bit and take a long time off - in fact, I intended never to return. But I still see enormous benefit in the project, and I'm back again and have even returned to admin duties. And those incompetent edits? Well, they have to happen, because it's new people every day who don't yet know how to contribute properly (and the barrage of Misplaced Pages polices can be quite daunting for a newcomer). Anyway, I'm not trying to tell you what to do, I'm just hoping that some thoughts from me might help. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
The reemergence of a blocked editor
I noticed Bilorv deleting personal attacks by an IP editor claiming I "got" what I supposedly deserved. I think I know who it i is: It's Whitmore8621, whose SPI reports I filed from September to October 2010 caught him redhanded. I have tracked down the IP and it's user history is more or less the same as that blocked editor. I know that due to my undeserved status, I can't file SPI reports again, but given that he's been editing on a lot of subjects he got hot water for before, he can't be let off the hook just because I'm out of the game. N--Eaglestorm (talk) 09:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Eaglestorm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)