Revision as of 05:14, 16 April 2015 editShoeMacneil (talk | contribs)41 edits →Neutrality issues← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:38, 28 December 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,761,673 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. (Fix Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with invalid parameters)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(76 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|13:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)|nominator=] (])|page=1|subtopic=Culture, sociology and psychology|status=onhold|note=}} | |||
{{Talk header|search=yes}} | {{Talk header|search=yes}} | ||
⚫ | {{controversial}} | ||
{{FailedGA|11:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)|topic=Culture, sociology and psychology|page=1}} | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= | ||
⚫ | {{WikiProject Human rights|importance=mid}} | ||
⚫ | {{WikiProject Women's History|importance=mid}} | ||
⚫ | {{WikiProject Death|importance=mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject India|importance=mid|gender=y}} | |||
{{WikiProject Feminism}} | |||
⚫ | }} | ||
⚫ | {{DYK talk|15 January|2014|... that ''']''' has a history spanning centuries?}} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
Line 10: | Line 19: | ||
|archive = Talk:Female infanticide in India/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Talk:Female infanticide in India/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
⚫ | {{controversial}} | ||
{{gs/talk notice|sasg}} | |||
{{WikiProjectBanners|1= | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject |
||
== External links modified == | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject Women's History |
||
⚫ | {{WikiProject |
||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject |
||
⚫ | }} | ||
I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
{{castewarningtalk}} | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111110085805/http://ncrb.nic.in:80/CII2010/cii-2010/Chapter%206.pdf to http://ncrb.nic.in/CII2010/cii-2010/Chapter%206.pdf | |||
⚫ | {{ |
||
==June 1986== | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
], hi. but the source gives "June 1986" for the India Today ''Born to Die'' cover story. ] (]) 02:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
:{{yo|In ictu oculi}} Article was DYK, and today I saw that you changed the year. Thanks for keeping it calm, I have self-reverted. ] (]) 02:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
::Thanks, there seem to be three sources in Google Books citing this article. ] (]) 02:21, 4 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 19:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
== External links modified == | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131212082637/http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/01/16/it%E2%80%99s-a-girl-the-three-deadliest-words-in-the-world/ to http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/01/16/it%E2%80%99s-a-girl-the-three-deadliest-words-in-the-world/ | |||
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://ncrb.nic.in/CII2010/cii-2010/Chapter%206.pdf | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
== Revert, why == | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 16:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
Please stop removing the image, it is for illustrative purposes and is fine. Also the change of dates (unexplained) and the use of primary sources. ] (]) 15:12, 11 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Nia Dokes Peer Review == | |||
Per ] "Images are primarily meant to inform readers by providing visual information. Consequently, images should look like what they are meant to illustrate, even if they are not provably authentic images." The image stays. ] (]) 16:40, 11 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
The article is very detailed and has a really good break down in statistics and no spelling or grammatical errors. The religious demographics table giving a break down to the different religions in terms of the ratio to females to males is really good. | |||
== Neutrality issues == | |||
] (]) 01:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
== "Selective stopping" can't skew sex ratios == | |||
This article is not neutral. It summarizes sources that highlight and present "high estimates" of female infanticide, but does not summarize sources that provide alternate "lower estimates" or question the high estimates. A neutral presentation would present all sides, high and low. There is plenty of reliable scholarly sources for the different sides. ] (]) 17:35, 13 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
:And, bollocks. Thanks for coming. ] (]) 17:41, 13 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Why does the article give "selective stopping of family size once a male is born" as a reason for skewed sex ratios? It is literally impossible for this, or indeed, any particular pattern of choices to have or not have an additional child in particular situations, to affect sex ratios of a society. It can change the chance of an individual family having more sons than daughters, but not the total number of each per 100 children. The many families with slightly more sons than daughters are balanced by a few who, following that strategy, end up with many many daughters before a son. | |||
::You reverted my edit, asking for a source! I already provided it: Christophe Z Guilmoto, Sex imbalances at birth Trends, consequences and policy implications, United Nations Population Fund, Hanoi (October 2011), ISBN 978-974-680-338-0, p. 49. Why did you remove it ? ] (]) 17:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
For further explanation of neutrality issues in this article, see . ] (]) 20:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
::This article is highly biased and racist. I shall be editing it suitably.] (]) 05:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
The claim that this can affect sex ratios is equivalent to the claim that one can go into a casino with booths offering even odds on coin flips, and consistently make money by moving to a new booth whenever you're ahead. It's frankly absurd. ] (]) 23:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I also see that this is a GA nominee. This article sucks and is undeserving of GA status. ] (]) 05:14, 16 April 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:38, 28 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Female infanticide in India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Female infanticide in India was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 30, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Female infanticide in India appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Female infanticide in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111110085805/http://ncrb.nic.in:80/CII2010/cii-2010/Chapter%206.pdf to http://ncrb.nic.in/CII2010/cii-2010/Chapter%206.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Female infanticide in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131212082637/http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/01/16/it%E2%80%99s-a-girl-the-three-deadliest-words-in-the-world/ to http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/01/16/it%E2%80%99s-a-girl-the-three-deadliest-words-in-the-world/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://ncrb.nic.in/CII2010/cii-2010/Chapter%206.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Nia Dokes Peer Review
The article is very detailed and has a really good break down in statistics and no spelling or grammatical errors. The religious demographics table giving a break down to the different religions in terms of the ratio to females to males is really good. Nia Dokes (talk) 01:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
"Selective stopping" can't skew sex ratios
Why does the article give "selective stopping of family size once a male is born" as a reason for skewed sex ratios? It is literally impossible for this, or indeed, any particular pattern of choices to have or not have an additional child in particular situations, to affect sex ratios of a society. It can change the chance of an individual family having more sons than daughters, but not the total number of each per 100 children. The many families with slightly more sons than daughters are balanced by a few who, following that strategy, end up with many many daughters before a son.
The claim that this can affect sex ratios is equivalent to the claim that one can go into a casino with booths offering even odds on coin flips, and consistently make money by moving to a new booth whenever you're ahead. It's frankly absurd. 166.198.25.78 (talk) 23:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class Human rights articles
- Mid-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Mid-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- B-Class Death articles
- Mid-importance Death articles
- B-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- B-Class Indian women and gender issues articles
- Unknown-importance Indian women and gender issues articles
- B-Class Indian women and gender issues articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject Indian women and gender issues articles
- WikiProject India articles
- B-Class Feminism articles
- Unknown-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- Misplaced Pages Did you know articles
- Misplaced Pages articles under general sanctions